An Arab Christian Challenges Dr Zakir & Points Arabic Grammatical Errors in the Quran

Zakir Naik


Channel: Zakir Naik

File Size: 4.98MB

Share Page
AI generated text may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn’t represent Muslim Central's views. Therefore, no part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever.

AI Generated Transcript ©

00:00:01--> 00:00:15

Dr. Becker, you said there isn't any mistake in Quran I see more than 20 mistake in Arabic grammar. And I will tell you some of them

00:00:17--> 00:00:21

in Vietnam and Ola Vina hado wasabi own

00:00:23--> 00:00:34

brother in Bukhara and hatch in the larina Manuel arena do a sardine which is Assad or Assad.

00:00:37--> 00:00:54

Brother Brother one question at a time Yeah. But the same thing he said in Psalm 63 in danila, Huron mistake in the Nila Sahara Can you explain that

00:00:57--> 00:00:58

and there is more than that.

00:01:00--> 00:01:08

Brother will allow you only the first part of the question. The second part will not allow because we have stated will allow time so others get a chance to okay.

00:01:09--> 00:01:17

The other has asked a very good question. I would like to be more concordance and again he has mentioned all 20 grammatical points. And the book is referring to

00:01:20--> 00:01:23

is the Quran infallible, I can see some things yeah.

00:01:24--> 00:01:24

That is good.

00:01:33--> 00:01:42

I will answer all 20 together because I've read the book on Psalm 20 inshallah inshallah, point number one,

00:01:43--> 00:02:10

point number one, point number one to be noted that all Arabic grammar is taken from the Quran. Quran was the highest Arabic book, a book which has the maximum level of highest literature. All the Arabic grammar has been derived from the Quran. Quran is the textbook of grammar, since Quran is the textbook of grammar and all the grammar is there from the Quran. The Quran can never have a mistake number one,

00:02:11--> 00:02:12

why number two?

00:02:14--> 00:02:15

Why number two?

00:02:16--> 00:02:23

Why number two, it is like you know, take your ruler, and the ruler is there has a measurement, and the measurement is wrong.

00:02:25--> 00:02:27

Sounds illogical. Point number two

00:02:29--> 00:02:57

in the different types of Arabia and your Arabic and Dr. William Campbell also agree with me in different Arabic tribes, the grammar keeps on changing in some Arabic tribe. The word is feminine, the same word isn't masculine, the other tribes of Arabia in different tribes, the grammar keeps on changing, even the gender keeps on changing. So will you check Quran with that faulty grammar? No. And furthermore, the eloquence of Quran is so high

00:02:58--> 00:03:14

is so high, it is far superior. And you know there are various books on the internet to go well grammatical mistake 21 geometrical mistake abdulhadi 20 grammatical mistake. Do you think that Christian people to call the mistakes, mistakes due to

00:03:16--> 00:03:57

the Muslim, the Muslim scholars like a machete what they did that the Quran grammar is so high that it goes against the conventional use of the Arabic the Quran grammar is so high to prove the Quranic grammar was high. They give examples and I give you a couple of examples which will answer all these 20 questions. They give the example like reading the Quran, it says that the people of Luth Allah salam, they rejected all the messengers. They rejected the messenger that mentioned today William Campbell said, the people of Noah rejected the messengers. We know from history that there was only one messenger sent to them. So the other grammatical mistake Quran should have said the people

00:03:57--> 00:04:34

rejected the messenger, not messengers. agree with you with layman demo like how have you and I know it may be a mistake, but if you read the books written by Arabs, what is the beauty of the Quran? The beauty of the Quran is why does the Quran differ messengers instead of messenger? You know why? Because we know that the basic message of all the messengers were same, that there's one God about the heat of Allah subhanaw taala by mentioning the people of brutally Salaam, the people of Noah rejected the messenger it failed by rejecting ruthless Olam, the entirety rejecting all the messengers.

00:04:40--> 00:04:59

See the beauty see the eloquence Allah, you may think it's a mistake, it's not a mistake. Similarly, people says that front says gunfire can be and it is it should be can be and it was a good past in fiscal pecan in Arabic. It's not confirmed, but the confession is most of

00:05:00--> 00:05:06

It says, Allah it was it is and can do, past, present and future. Thank you