» Earn on-going rewards and help us do more! «

If a Person goes to an Arab Country and Kills Millions..

share this pageShare Page
Zakir Naik

Channel: Zakir Naik

Episode Notes

If a Person goes to an Arab Country and Kills Millions and Returns to India who Protects him even after Evidence against him. What Action should be taken against India

Episode Transcript

© No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever. Transcripts are auto-generated and thus will be be inaccurate. We are working on a system to allow volunteers to edit transcripts in a controlled system.


00:00:01--> 00:00:35

Yeah, myself is Ravi Kumar, I am a software engineer. And my first request to my fellow Indians is don't always relate September 11 with the terrorism because so many things have happened in India, more than 20,000 people have been killed in Kashmir 2000 Muslim brothers have been killed in Gujarat. So, we have so many instance to link with terrorism in India itself. Like we can link it to somebody that intuitive terrorism and the day in which after them temple, people are interred that we can link it with the terrorism. My

00:00:37--> 00:01:23

I thank Mr. Jagged Knight for clearing the misconception about the jihad. My question is that you told that just for the sake of one person, you cannot attack the country? No, I am asking you about the imaginary scenario. Suppose I'm going to the some Arab country I'm crossing a great devastation I'm killing lakhs and crores of people there. And I'm coming back to the India and the country is giving a proof to me who approved Indian Government trading that this person has caused the devastation and the Indian government is repeatedly still telling the terror proof what is given by you is not valid. And that proof is being shared with you other countries, they all agree and

00:01:23--> 00:01:42

suppose the country repeatedly is not ready to surrender me. Then what is the action that particular country has to take? Let let just I'm not completed. And another thing is the proof of that country is previously also when that kidnap the plane

00:01:43--> 00:01:52

entered that they encourage the kidnappers they are allowed the terrorists who will come in that plane to escape out of the country.

00:01:53--> 00:02:25

If that is the state of the country, then what is the action that particular country has to take it you are telling suppose I have come after causing a devastation I come back to India Indian Government is not ready to surrender me. And the proofs have been given and Indian Government is repeatedly telling the proof what you're given is not valid. What is the action that country has to take? The brother has asked a very good question. And a very relevant question. A very good analogy between what's happened. Learned September again, though he came back to live in September.

00:02:28--> 00:02:40

And Roger very good that he has a person goes and crosses an Arab country because 1000s of people devastation comes back and Arab country gets proof to the Indian government Indian government does not accept

00:02:41--> 00:03:12

Mullah Omar again is not my friend. He told USA. He told us a give me proof and the USA government could not give proof they shared it with Tony Blair. They shared with Musharraf Musharraf is saying that I have got enough proof. I have seen the proof when you asking the Afghanistan Government to give the culprit the Afghanistan Government is telling me please give us proven they could not give proved Afghanistan Government and they're sharing it with Tony Blair. It is illogical that we there's something fishy in the proof till today, till today.

00:03:14--> 00:03:57

Till today, Osama bin Laden is prime suspect it fully hypothesis, the proof should be solid proof. And if they're given solid proof that Osama bin Laden had done it, Afghanistan had to hand over Osama bin Laden. We didn't do if you do something with our country and our country give proof. And if Indian Government objects, then you can go to the international court of law where the international court about any place in case Osama bin Laden, where is it? Where is it? There are international guidelines. Do you know the rule of international guidelines, if suppose there is an extradition policy between the foreign countries for example, if a person like India and UK have an

00:03:57--> 00:04:24

extradition policy, if any criminal of India does a crime and goes to UK they can ask for the criminal back and one of the example Nadeem Nadeem, the music director, the Indian government said that was involved in Wilson's murder. So when they gave the proof in UK Government in the UK court of law, the UK court of law said approval nonsense. They sued the government Indian Government Indian government had to pay the charges of the advocates

00:04:26--> 00:04:26

of not

00:04:28--> 00:04:37

enough proof they gave. They didn't agree they say approve and not valid. Did India wage a war against UK wide individual mining damage.

00:04:40--> 00:05:00

But the Indian government gave prove at least their us in India proved Afghanistan at all. So even now, if you go to a Saudi land or any Arab land, and if you do something and if Saudi Arabia gives proof here that you are the culprit, even if the Indian government doesn't agree, Saudi government or any

00:05:00--> 00:05:04

Arab country cannot bombard the 1 billion Indians. It doesn't give permission.

00:05:05--> 00:05:34

Islam doesn't give permission that even if you're the culprit, even you have killed 1 million people, they can come and catch you. If they have the power. They can't bombard the innocent people. They can't they can't do it. It's not allowed in Islam. Same thing you're saying, let's talk about the present scenario in Kashmir, in Gujarat. And, actually, Adam, I say that whatever may be the background, why those two terrorists entered in Islam, you cannot destroy the monasteries, you cannot kill the religious people.

00:05:35--> 00:05:42

When one goes in a monastery, in a place of worship, in the temple, and killing innocent people, it is against the Quran.

00:05:43--> 00:05:55

It is against the Quran, we have to condemn it. Just because those two people, whatever the reason was, and they got a letter that they believe they came from daddy kick his ass, he says Arabic word,

00:05:56--> 00:06:07

which means you can take revenge. And it felt it was the cause was because maybe their family was killed. Even if their family was killed. They have no right to kill 44 people

00:06:11--> 00:06:47

the cause was maybe somebody else but the action was wrong. Just because somebody killed if they knew who the person that killed the family members, if they have gone and taken revenge with that person for separate, how can they kill other 44 people innocent? So in Islam also, even if you know who the main culprit is, as I said in my talk, and for me, that's chapter five verse 32. If anyone kills any other human being, unless it be for murder, or for creating mischief in the land, it is as though yes killed all of humanity. Only if you know the person is the face brand mischief and then murder that is the only way that you can kill him for no other reason can kill anyone else. Islam

00:06:47--> 00:06:49

condemned that as though you have killed all of humanity problems.