Zakir Naik – Disabled Person Pay A Ransom Inspite Being Exempted From Fasting

Zakir Naik
AI: Summary © The speaker discusses the issue of disabled people having to pay a payment for their fast, which is equivalent to feeding an indigent person. The cause of this payment is the modality of the situation, and if a person is disabled, he may not be able to observe the fast. The speaker suggests that if a person is disabled and missed fast, he may have to pay a payment equivalent to feeding an indigent person.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:44

Next point, if you like regarding the situation of a disabled person, why is it a disabled person has to pay a ransom due to the fact they haven't fasted? Unless isn't the Quran in surah baqarah chapter number two, what's the modality for that, if it is difficult for a person to fast, you can either fast appear and that is feeding of an indigent person or a poor person. The reason is, that if a person is disabled, or if you think permanently, and there are no signs that he will become healthy, where he can observe fast. So the question of him compensating

00:00:45 --> 00:01:02

the question for him to keep the fast later on doesn't arise at all. So that is the reason for him. There is a ransom that he has to pay something that is equivalent to feeding an indigent person or feed indigent person for every fast that he has missed.

Dr Zakir Naik – Why Should A Disabled Person Pay A Ransom Inspite Of Being Exempted From Fasting_

Share Page

Related Episodes