Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 8
Date:
Channel: Jamal Zarabozo
Series: Jamal Zarabozo - Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth
File Size: 20.09MB
Related
- Mufti Menk – Who is Muhammad pbuh to you
- Ammar Alshukry – The Guide To Wisdoms #1
- Yaser Birjas – Love Of Your Parents Vs Love Of Your Spouse
- Zakir Naik – Is not God Unfair to One who Dies Earlier as he has less Time to do Good Deeds
- Mirza Yawar Baig – Ramadan 2024 Reminders #08
- Mufti Menk – The happiest people on Earth
- Azan / Ezan / Athan / Adhan – Sheikh Muhammad Muadhin – Makkah – 5th December 2018 – Dhuhr
AI Generated Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of understanding headings and headings in various fields, including real estate and professional life. They stress the need for adequate information for the jury, the use of negative language in media, and the importance of researching and reviewing works of a scholar. They also touch on narration and the use of narratives in media, including the potential for mistakes and surprises. The conversation touches on the use of negative language in media and the importance of knowing the history of narrators and the use of informational media.AI Generated Transcript ©
It was a pleasure.
Before we, before we begin,
we're going to begin with an editorial No.
Just in the future, you ever hear anyone say that there's no need to study or what?
You should be ready with a response or
response.
First of all,
if you want to find a read of us, as soon as
you're going to have three to help you, in any book,
you're going to find these terms that we're talking about.
You're gonna find terms like
what would happen?
Yeah, know how much weight to put in need and what they seem trustworthy or not. So as soon as the second sort of exam and quarters, the revelation, any book you read on the Sooners want to have this.
Secondly, all the other sizes related to the theme are built upon the sentence of aluminum heavy,
any book that we're going to have to have heavy, that has heavy, it's going to use these terms to pick up any book are
going to have a reason it is going to use these terms. And even if
they tried to discuss these, these terms,
because they are theorists, they don't do very good job.
And in any book and also, we'll read chapter on Jeff, what did
he do? He
didn't say
some exclusion is not a possibility to another.
Third, third,
that
doesn't matter what anyone
argues.
Some people that use the terms of remedy, when they write about something, they use the terms incorrectly and they try to fool the reason
like someone writing about.
It says that the certain
we'll learn later when
he was the chairman correctly to try to prove his point.
Okay, so in order to catch those things you have to know about the
second point is all of the other sizes, use these terms and
whether it's similar to theater or history, theater,
you're going to come across these terms in almost any book related to
the fifth floor. Also, as we know, the orientalist. And some ignorant Muslims are attacking this woman.
And the only reason the only way to reply to them and they're in a good knowledgeable matters by studying these things.
Also,
is a way of,
of increasing your your pain or your certainty that Allah subhanaw taala preserved this Deen. And the way that the human
brain works was
that
because
somebody who already means that all, everything is ready
for it, and
so on, and so
forth. I mean, that doesn't make sense. Because the same formula is the same
for everything.
The first point was that as soon as the second source of Islam in any time you want to find out what this one is, you're going to have to read having any book of headings is going to contain
the set of terms that we're using when we're studying
Third point.
Third point is some people use these terms when they write
about PIP or other things in the use the terms either incorrectly or without knowledge.
points.
Those books now the the big collections
that they were only my
ministry.
And nowadays they were the only you can publish
and to suppose somebody is supposed to know how to
cook, the chef mentioned that it's already their
whole life
doing this
there are some heavy, we can still study nowadays and read. And even more importantly,
you need to understand what he said about those, those headings.
And in order to understand what he said about the headings, you have to have some knowledge about
the for example, you don't only think about headings, you consider setting
as important. So you take any,
and after the headings, this is what often
happens.
What do you think about that?
You just got to skip it. You got to find this statement and books
and books.
And all the other sciences are built upon, actually, you cannot avoid them.
anybody tried to
make whatever they want?
There's no question that it's
all generations.
But I'm not talking about those specialists. I'm talking about this the common person like you or me.
I can be just the vocal like purple sooner that everyone uses and discuss some of those terms and some of the things he says and some of the heady and he will help you be familiar with
real estate. What do you think? Sometimes the author himself doesn't know what to think. But he quoted it from some book. And he put it the
the thing that actually wrote this office and what the author thinks
they use
sometimes
to differentiate between different specialisms.
So in the future
don't have to look for me
or make a statement like that. Just
go ahead and respond.
Much.
All right, yes, because I'm looking at my notes. So
we will assume that
now we come to the next question is how can someone be confirmed as
By the way, there's one question that
we'll discuss
maybe next time.
Northern. So how can someone be confirmed as
we
indicated two weeks
I don't know why but
now you look into
No wonder
students do support
being confirmed is
one of the ways is by
what do I mean by that and discuss
his position in transmitting heavies and being as well known, there's no question about
it for example, admin handle whatever he was asked about.
About the top given
away
from
from level headed, what are the scores of hate, the name is pronounced something.
And sometimes
most of the time the people have had a different
way in Persian means the devil system. So they don't like to call
me actually
was asked to talk
to us well, people like he asked
us
so people like email medic, even Jaffe
the other great schools of Haiti, they are confirmed, they're well known. And also one thing about being famous is that if they do something wrong, that's going to be spread. If someone like medic, was seen drinking wine, some guy everyone's going to know about, everyone's gonna say that.
So we added being famous also keeps the person away from doing that. And he has this dead as positioning as responsibility. So he's even more careful about doing calm because he knows everyone is watching.
Okay.
So that's one way what's the other way?
Good thing is
first of all, this division, he says other rules
don't condition was missing there.
And he's someone that we know
what what do we talk about less than?
One of the one of the things we talk about is the condition for the one who was making Jeff attend the event.
This is efficient, to be a critic.
question, Is that sufficient
to know Him and not as low?
We're just talking about this.
Either Okay, can I start saying that no later in
life, what do
you have
to meet the other conditions? So not another, or other I don't think that he said, but other people who are qualified
in general, I totally get that.
Other people who aren't qualified in the sense of what that is saying that is that is not just
people who are qualified in the science of jeopardy.
Danny, the critic.
Not the
The
Critic is qualified to be critical.
Someone was qualified to be credit grade the person has been.
And is one so critical. You should know.
Someone who
is once a visit that one critic
says so and so is
sufficient.
sufficient if there's no one who makes the trade for the front.
There's no other
no other nothing who needs to do no other critical needs
as a good way most most
something like this one is sufficient. And if there's no contradiction most leads to
at least two credits.
Like the witness said, you have to have two people
making pythia for him before
they make clear.
Over.
Yes, you mentioned some we mentioned Sofia natori.
I'll give you I have a table. I didn't bring it because people never look at it.
I have a table of the major critics of each generation.
We're not talking about a
victim confirmed. Okay. A few of them things. Without any contradiction, we will discuss contradiction. The two scholars to credit scholars have Jeffersonian status, then we
know, the question, though,
the question that comes up is this disease to critics? Do they have to explain why it is adverse to make the jury for me this?
Is your students.
If for example,
someone has to explain it.
If I say Neither do I have to explain why?
It is, I think five opinions on this.
Well, okay, we will we will extend the question to also
the first opinion, opinion of the
majority is
that we're sending this to both.
So in the future, we don't have to discuss
again,
if you make
up the three per hour
as you said in the video, the majority of the scars of the spin. That's what I wrote down
must be explained.
What's the why is this such a popular opinion?
To say someone is asking what are you saying at
all? So if you're going to explain it, how are you going to say
the effect
The month of Ramadan.
He doesn't
he doesn't lie, he doesn't cheat. She doesn't make it easy.
So the point that they're making is this idea that is
well known, what makes a person?
And so therefore only if they're going to explain it, they're going to need 10 pages for each at all because that
so
bored of us. Why do they think the generator must be?
A First of all, I only need one
bedroom necklace mistake.
What else was another point that critics had in mind why it's a chicken,
chicken and also two
other critics saying
not just protected, but also because sometimes when it comes to the jury, especially for those fixed scholars, they might reject someone. And the reason they reject them is not sufficient.
For example, one who talks too much they rejected the score, because he talks too much
suspicion about
so therefore, they must be explained.
That way, why, for example,
you might find some narratives that
other scores meet the dream for
what happened was either that was not explained, and others or their nature was not that effective to
have the second the
second is the opposite of that.
is you need an explanation.
You don't need an
editorial comment at the beginning of
the class, I mentioned that people will sort of they have a tendency to discuss these points also. So this is the opinion of him, I was hoping that he
will have.
Okay,
so this is basically the finish.
And the problem with this routine, and they said they are mostly theoreticians, they're not actually, in fact, they did not actually practice
resuming last
joint.
me Wow, can they say that?
They don't considerably but what they say and if people might be
not shy, but they might hesitate to say something bad about someone else. So
Muslim nation
that is not a strong opinion.
Next,
of course, we have the courts and Muslims because the thing is this.
Okay, third opinion is you need an explanation for either
what's the reasoning and
the reasoning for explaining duties is the same as the
same reasoning applies, but why do they also the outcomes
or
perhaps also, there's some degrees of
this
Yeah.
degrees. That could be
really, really?
Well, the basic argument is that this person may make that year for the wrong reason also,
we set up here in lightweight degrees for the wrong reasons. Here we might make, like the person who said,
about one of the narratives, admittedly,
one person called jacobians. We
said about MLM units, I heard that people saying that he is weak. But that's only because the car sit with his father. And if you see his beard, the length of his beard.
So he's saying, and if you look at his beard and his nose, he must be.
So in other words, he's making daddy for the wrong reason.
What's the response to that?
And how do these people respond to that? I
mean,
yeah, they say this is the case, however, they respond to the argument. Maybe the data is for the wrong. And they give that
love that it's very rare. But what are the conditions for that? For?
That?
Guy, obviously, this person was saying, Yeah, you can see his beard and
he doesn't know anything about jet with daddy. Right? So the problem is not that he's making that deal for the wrong reason. The problem is he's not qualified to make that leap.
So the answer to that is, although this is a good,
because it's
always good to be safe.
staples, of course, when
you just say,
part one,
you have to explain,
either.
And this is the opinion of
the book.
What about the
people?
And many of those who need
this, as many of those who mean that these are like the shocking
most of the others?
No, because he's the only one who has written a complete book about almost every aspect of
the book about traveling.
He has a book about
taking heavy he has a book about someone people who used to know how to visit the Forgotten
almost anything you could imagine he hasn't had the book of us. So he
should remember his name.
What is
enough for this condition for the critics has to meet for him to be sifted,
explained.
Does anyone understand
the reasons for the reasons for tabular well known among the scores. So the score is someone knows me there's no reason to ask him to explain
that but
we know not to be like manic
isn't explained.
That's why the explanation is always better.
But here's what if another theory was also one of these.
This opinion he wrote,
it is not necessary to mention the reason in either case
because of the
person is not an expert in the field that has done with that deal will be rejected.
And if he is an expert, then there's no need to ask him about
that he knows that he was
assumed that
he would
give us assume that
we will
be the scholars of Kava danila. You can check what you said with what other scholars saying if they disagree a lot.
But what's the what's the bone with this?
Why is this not the opinion of the majority?
All the other
human errors can be
when you when you talk about the
matter of
the matter of applying principles. And if you do not show people how you're applying the principles, there's no way for us really to see whether or not you're
headed.
Now
it says that the if someone is categorized as
someone
categorize
and then someone says so it makes the date for the same person,
then the jury will not be accepted without explanation.
Someone has stated but in scores to be added, then the judge will not be accepted without explanation.
Makes sense? The
first thing that we've discussed so far that makes sense.
What's the problem with this
from what somebody said to be
the problem was is is it
not a big fan the whole
me buy this is not some cover all the possible cases.
To make sense, the best thing is that this one goes with this
person. The first one is going to
give us the corollary to the first one
because by itself is an
uncomfortable
one says that the jury has displayed in all circumstances that is
what what is what is basically saying is that the jury
will not be accepted.
In general if someone has stayed together except explain
as these are proven.
For example, he has in mind that about shopping
to see I mean what's what's the evidence for that because all
scores are more jealous of each other than the goats.
Go to the zoo we see that some of the
European and American
Zoo
all right
Got
any questions about
this one is
because
there is another one hate them
against
certain terminology for example, if I say
hi, that means many other books.
That means,
if you mean
and also you're
not alone
The first one
that they used to make
doing this and this was
definitely funny
things.
Remember, most of the
things are happening while the people are alive. So they have the chance to respond.
agrees with the first
one.
Again, it has to be doesn't have to be something that nobody says. Yeah, I think as always with the second point is with
any questions about
how to confirm someone?
Yeah, Danny, the way someone is confirmed to be either either by fame or by to critics of sustaining him to be under that, that I will have to be explained or not.
When we come to
the same thing applies to scores make him do they have to say are not the same?
There are
two ways either by being by two
perfect except
what is the minimum?
Okay, they differentiated in between. It's not always good.
When when there's
one or two mistakes
he was from the people who asked them and he was from the scholars room.
Yeah, you can find it in the in the books of
the Bible.
For example.
Debbie has something like 25
books, six books, there's something like 12,000 15,000
nowadays more
so than any
job.
Go back to the
critique and you are using the knowledge of the earliest sometimes to discuss them that maybe
earlier scholars mentioned, discuss, they discuss it again to make sure that their opinion was correct and see if they need me because what are the
people that I trust
has the
25 volumes, published
25 points.
Some of these have not been discussed, some of this has not been discussed.
To me,
hates me, he discussed many of them.
But he did not really discuss them in detail.
There's even a Muslim, the last one No. Bye.
This is the largest Muslims that we know.
And many of the ideas that have not been published
yet
last year,
particular game, and in the future is different from any of the other books. Yeah, that's right.
Any other questions?
So, somebody
also has a collection for
food.
It also is also
importance of
playing.
Listen, I wanted to say that it's also
Yes.
If you remember electrical problems before it came as
one of the major reasons, some of them did not know how to use and other people know, or they knew it through a weak chain, and therefore they didn't apply. Well, other people knew
would be
the subject that shifts the title of the lecture.
And he did not discuss that.
Okay, here's some miscellaneous questions concerning
like a pop quiz.
The narrator
either, so
may you conclude the TSP me?
Okay, let's put it this way. This class will look older than
the person who stepped up but he stayed with me for a very short time we're not experts.
Or he was very young when he is with the Zodiac. Why did you stay long? Did not
not long.
So this person has stepped up. But yeah, I mean, most of us.
We don't
examine from
Well, this
is a special report the great scores of all of them, we can break down their students into these categories
in general, but when it comes to his narrations from he is one example of the scholar by the name of pushing and pushing
Ah
machine you will find this array
is better but you'll never find use one of these two you'll never find
because in the heaviest of Azov he was not strong and he was very young and efficient.
So we do not accept this Henry Ford inherited from
us that he might have
after he left he lost some of his mental capabilities made more mistakes
but we said sometimes
that reversal universal class
is older than five
but what you're what you're what you're describing is something in the later years anyway, we said we just give him a book. And he has the right to read from that book.
Okay, now we're talking about 30 years
before he became good and it
takes a little while to get to start to peace of mind is not mine. Who
gave me what the head is now with this man. And even if you wrote them down,
some of you will write them down long and so forth. But if after one year to keep doing it, you start recognizing the change who was whose students you don't make them up you know, who was
Yeah, you know, the who's who
are they in general, but they stayed with us it for a long time.
And they are experts.
I stayed with him for years and he has a bad memory. But when you give him the same thing for 40 years every day he starts to pick it up. So these days in general, but
what
does that mean? He's the power we suppose any no matter who we never
know for example, sorry, we can divide by categories.
For example,
okay, she was a student that was earning
and love is a third party which you'll never see her shame.
Yeah, for these people,
only
about
you will find
the finding
the first category, the second category, you will not find them.
The third category there are basically we can call them
and you will find people in this category of adults and the third many in books.
Okay.
The four categories are people who are life in general
will define
the general
overview
for one
zero
and the last category are people who are rejected under any circumstance, liars fortress of hate any
muscle keep
that.
What's the
difference between
someone who has a little weakness and he's supported by other people that exactly the same way? We may raise his head to a higher level.
But this category No.
This isn't going to say oh, you
What did they wish? They are people? Not good characters. Now they can say, you know, I'm one of the somebody students
they said was
they are
talking about this category.
Second,
okay, this is for not a long time.
They did not stay with somebody for a long time. In other words, their knowledge
but the knowledge and other people's ideas are good.
For
me, it depends on the person, some people are experts, because he, he will memorize what the person said. Other people know, they have to say
so, depends on the
like to welcome you to the continuation of our English
was the question
the narrator does not need a stable cutter Samuelson. Can we conclude that he is not?
Happy?
Okay, let's
add the medic.
Again, there was nothing
to include just
to include the all authentic had you throw something there isn't?
suppose
there's no one who's scoring
any merits? Someone who doesn't mean? Like for example, definitely or someone who I have no doubt about?
has told me.
So in other words, he didn't give us the name.
Any someone I have moved up.
The question
is What about the
champion?
Because he has won?
Because
he will not say anything.
Knock.
Here's a question that
someone might be important to remember. Because what he knows about him
but someone else
someone else that may have
some information that the membership doesn't have. Right?
So in other words, we know all you have is a scholar.
So General tab you also.
But when Yanni he says about someone that if he doesn't name that person, the problem is that it might be someone who he considers
that he may not be.
So although the score disagree on this point, some people aren't like you, they will accept
the score.
But the safer the stronger opinion
that he has a question that he has. If he does not mention him,
then strong opinions.
Now there's some source, some scars only. Next question, isn't it a famous case? person?
famous case
His name is somewhere in this chapter.
Job is the only scholar who said this person is the
Narrator The oldest scholar who concluded that
And even though we
remember
when he said about delivery, shall we?
Some people say
they said that he was talking about his uncle.
Suppose an adult
the only one who says that what's
missing is
an example of a case where
this is evidence that we should not accept anyone statement if he says Danny had any book or without mentioning who the person
that he was the question of which he had.
My my point was, there was a person that
doesn't even let time because that matters.
In general, there's the
gun in general, people know who who is talking about his students, no one was talking about, for example, the mathematics that
means arbitrary
destiny is
so they know how to example.
Economic
students know who we talking about. That's a different game.
In front of me right here, what did they say?
Everyone knows who's talking about. So it's like giving
more of a
don't even use his name anymore. You just call him that?
Everyone knows. So let's just in one
case, and if the students know what he's talking about, then we can.
Yeah, so for me, I read the
shows, and I have no idea who is talking about. I would have to say I cannot be selfless.
I don't say if we don't say but I cannot make judgment on it until I find out who that person.
And that's the footnote right here. It says
suppose the
narrator narrates and someone you mentioned that person, for example, suppose
that doesn't mean?
Does that mean that she is
the closest competitor?
Because
I've never really had it from someone. Does that mean in my point of view that this person was supposed to do that?
That means
someone's narrating and someone else with authority imply that this person is
even if
it doesn't happen?
Okay, let's go to the File.
system.
Principle
isn't the case. But if someone has stepped up and he knows about general varies from someone else,
does that mean the other person
may say yes. Did you say
did you
know? In a way, okay, you say yes. To this, you will say no, why not? Because he could
not
be
To
condition
okay.
Okay shouldn't be saved that
this would make any sense at all everyone I come to
on Monday I gave a lecture about Ecuador
I mentioned some then on Thursday if I mentioned these areas I don't have mentioned again but this one's
super tuition
earlier
somewhere
that first of all with respect to weakened areas
as someone who has asthma
but not 100%
Okay, Johnny is its own little wallet in fact you will be called by
know why would I do races Hey you
got to
be honest but make mistakes
so why would I narrate this
maybe to support other teams okay is to support more now in order to know the penny in order to if there is some other support someone has the same idea to a different department. So what do you have to carry this week we still have to pass on this petty
we also do it through any sponsors mistake
oh thank you
meaning of it because
my wife
is weak when it comes to his policy
but he is I mean
he stays away from a more remote
as well as me
Yeah.
I mean, I can we assume that
No,
not me, not me. I'm
talking about the world.
Know what I'm saying? Is
we still married Is it
okay, because Danny we know that in
the comments he makes mistakes. So if we can remove this possibility of error by finding the same people and they support each other that we conclude the script
because they thought that you said
Yeah.
Yeah, you want
to
narrate from night then we assume the night of must be
what was the mission?
Okay, I'm saying that if I
I still may narrate a four week narrative.
I still know people who are not especially if there are others but not
in order to know that every
guy needs the promise with his editors. We know that he must lie that he may have made a mistake from
okay so he made a mistake.
Now we find someone else like I'm so similar to him make more mistakes.
Okay, now I never
will be there will be forever
But I have to pass it on to the next generation.
So what we find is that this narration
is supported by marriage.
So we can conclude that this is not one of life's mistakes
because episode supports him in exactly the same way that he
checks
So, since we have to check the other team that means we have to continue to pay so even though it means we have to continue to
know what I'm saying went back to the original question is that we cannot assume just because I'm sick as everyone I'm hearing from because I will still be narrating from week narrator's for this reason
number two
maybe I don't know the corner
but I don't know if it's the corner
case
this case assuming you know that he hasn't already knows that he's weak but he's still there.
But he doesn't
know what are we gonna
get along as we give you all the information
we may not use it as a proof
Okay, the difference between testing and using highly sensitive words
because I don't know if we still or not I cannot use the Edit as a proof but I can pass it on as information that this person says is so bad.
So the narrator or the narrator may not know
so therefore even though it doesn't mean that when I'm there any from all of them
there are some scholars of any of those who are known
they were known to only narrow a need for people with a considered visa
for example even medic with respect to the people who inherited from Medina
my mother would never marry anyone from the GM was weak he would only narrow
not that long at the week
no worries no worries you just apply this
week
even a
week
yeah, I
don't know.
I don't know.
Yeah.
That I will not use it as
he says I don't know. But I will pass it on to recorded my book and pass it on to other people. And those people may know that person
of course No, I've
never
had it on with me I may not know that night.
And another reason that they used to do it
is to record the
knowledge to know the the chain in order to know the any of the
the way the head is assessed.
Give you a story from
blink.
Yeah, he used to record the history of mama and a van.
I used to record the
event. I can
record this Eddie, Eddie. And he used to tell these people this
man
this really
stupid head used to do these to keep an eye on the one who's recording.
So okay, so I'm in Hamburg as the mayor here. Why are you recording this?
Oh, okay.
appointment
he was one of the
event
so he asked him Okay, why are you doing this? So he entered him is it all about the love
for those who are listening
he said I write these pages and I memorize all these headaches and I know that they are fabricated but they do so in order for no one to come along later and change this neck from service and
then wants to know exactly what it is Who are the people in this net How is it being
used service that
can be changed from event to
event was important to step two is
to just to know that it
exists to know any this person is weak very weak but he's narrating in this way
but also to know that they may take it for people who are not
to keep
the story about someone who has done something like 1500 petty nasty
all
now whenever you hear them you know they've ever
had, you
know, getting to know the weekend goes
what's up
from life?
So
let's binary from from Nice,
nice, nice
thing
is this guy
here first of all,
suppose you forgot that he
remember you told me this idea.
Maybe
five years ago, he said
and he told me that
you
the biggest one.
There's nothing wrong with that
situation, there are some headings you will find them
where the scholar says, for example,
the scholars named Sohail
who his students would
have forgotten, afterwards, used to narrate a name via narrated it on my authority, and he is
responsible.
And they just want to pay the probability that the shift provided is greater than the probability that the narrator says he heard from this year. How did they conclude that I'm not sure?
Because she has more than 10 students.
But what about the other case now?
Suppose suppose,
he says this
definitely
doesn't work. What's up
Well
econometric study showing this
now the other key
when I said I never said
that's the problem
What do we do in this case?
Can we can check to see who is correct but
the first case is he said
certain cases categorically denied
What
do we say that life can now we make it easy for him do we make me do it
okay what about the first equation
see now he can call me a liar and I can call him a liar
so what happens in a case like this we don't make the secret either one we know one of them
and if this happens a lot especially with a certain ship then we know that this happens
but at the same time we don't we we
wait wait for further clarification until other sources
No, we will not.
We will narrow it when there is
a mention but we will not say that
until we feel
and by the way that sort of put me down in a cod have all written books about people who narrated hate and then later they forgot that
God is always the third
choice I suppose there's someone who has
that we don't know anything.
We just know for example a
ring the Royal
we don't know this person
always
you
know in this case it is like hit up a load face.
know who we are. We know who he is but we don't really know
the
35 different opinions about whatever it is
the important thing is to know
guys officer
eggs wages this month we're doing
have
come on
there anything wrong with taking away numbers getting paid?
A little bit
from the caller because they make a
third point.
I mean, do we accept them as our or can we can we say that can be sensible?
Okay, it is allowed to take money for teaching. Yes.
Long as a billion is good. You're going to take money because the promises system says the thing that you have most like the most like big money for teaching
From the
Yeah, we don't care where the money is from right now.
Okay, what we can conclude concerning the one who takes money to marry, we cannot conclude that just because it takes money is unacceptable.
Let's have a
look at like a teaching karate wants to make up the series to be a bigger teacher and have more more people who
can most most of the earliest cause is headed by the way they supported themselves.
Because they were businessmen.
And then
there was like a
24 hour day, it was a 24 hour day and we would
use it.
Many of the teachers if they were
okay.
It'd be simpler than it used to have got one month one
pick up the phone and send me a fax
before any needs to have the right to edit.
A good cause disease is
the kind of thing that
goes to a farmer and so the
farmer may tend to go up to six, and they don't come back into learn
what you need to have and how much time it takes to get what
we were talking about.
was rich.
He used to support the students
because someone was good.
He would say I hate this person. And don't accept this for me.
Let me say
so yeah, just because just because someone is taking money any particular headache we can conclude just because let me know.
Okay.
Well, basically I've been talking about
teaching.
Then in the early years Daddy, what do you mean by daring teaching is about the same thing, someone systems and since a certain time that he will give any
nowadays
because there are so many,
especially if you're alive. Now when we look back at it,
and it looks more
difficult than was in
between
People who are actually involved in these things
are much clearer to them than
looking back
to be used as evidence for something
not to be a loser
at the difference between existing
versus former heading towards
that point
how can you make
a copy
of what you come up with?
Difficult
to shift students
to be surprised
because it's not easy to
use
to kick