Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 8

Jamal Zarabozo

Channel: Jamal Zarabozo

Series:

Episode Notes

share this pageShare Page

Episode Transcript

© No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever. Transcripts are auto-generated and thus will be be inaccurate. We are working on a system to allow volunteers to edit transcripts in a controlled system.


00:00:08--> 00:00:10

It was a pleasure.

00:00:17--> 00:00:19

Before we, before we begin,

00:00:23--> 00:00:24

we're going to begin with an editorial No.

00:00:29--> 00:00:35

Just in the future, you ever hear anyone say that there's no need to study or what?

00:00:37--> 00:00:39

You should be ready with a response or

00:00:42--> 00:00:42

response.

00:00:58--> 00:00:59

First of all,

00:01:00--> 00:01:02

if you want to find a read of us, as soon as

00:01:03--> 00:01:07

you're going to have three to help you, in any book,

00:01:08--> 00:01:10

you're going to find these terms that we're talking about.

00:01:14--> 00:01:15

You're gonna find terms like

00:01:17--> 00:01:18

what would happen?

00:01:21--> 00:01:32

Yeah, know how much weight to put in need and what they seem trustworthy or not. So as soon as the second sort of exam and quarters, the revelation, any book you read on the Sooners want to have this.

00:01:34--> 00:01:42

Secondly, all the other sizes related to the theme are built upon the sentence of aluminum heavy,

00:01:43--> 00:01:50

any book that we're going to have to have heavy, that has heavy, it's going to use these terms to pick up any book are

00:01:52--> 00:01:55

going to have a reason it is going to use these terms. And even if

00:01:57--> 00:02:00

they tried to discuss these, these terms,

00:02:01--> 00:02:03

because they are theorists, they don't do very good job.

00:02:05--> 00:02:08

And in any book and also, we'll read chapter on Jeff, what did

00:02:10--> 00:02:11

he do? He

00:02:16--> 00:02:17

didn't say

00:02:23--> 00:02:26

some exclusion is not a possibility to another.

00:02:29--> 00:02:30

Third, third,

00:02:33--> 00:02:34

that

00:02:40--> 00:02:42

doesn't matter what anyone

00:02:43--> 00:02:43

argues.

00:02:48--> 00:02:56

Some people that use the terms of remedy, when they write about something, they use the terms incorrectly and they try to fool the reason

00:02:57--> 00:02:58

like someone writing about.

00:03:00--> 00:03:01

It says that the certain

00:03:02--> 00:03:03

we'll learn later when

00:03:04--> 00:03:07

he was the chairman correctly to try to prove his point.

00:03:08--> 00:03:11

Okay, so in order to catch those things you have to know about the

00:03:14--> 00:03:17

second point is all of the other sizes, use these terms and

00:03:19--> 00:03:22

whether it's similar to theater or history, theater,

00:03:24--> 00:03:27

you're going to come across these terms in almost any book related to

00:03:29--> 00:03:37

the fifth floor. Also, as we know, the orientalist. And some ignorant Muslims are attacking this woman.

00:03:38--> 00:03:46

And the only reason the only way to reply to them and they're in a good knowledgeable matters by studying these things.

00:03:49--> 00:03:50

Also,

00:03:52--> 00:03:53

is a way of,

00:03:55--> 00:04:02

of increasing your your pain or your certainty that Allah subhanaw taala preserved this Deen. And the way that the human

00:04:06--> 00:04:07

brain works was

00:04:10--> 00:04:10

that

00:04:13--> 00:04:13

because

00:04:16--> 00:04:20

somebody who already means that all, everything is ready

00:04:21--> 00:04:22

for it, and

00:04:23--> 00:04:24

so on, and so

00:04:27--> 00:04:32

forth. I mean, that doesn't make sense. Because the same formula is the same

00:04:33--> 00:04:34

for everything.

00:04:45--> 00:04:56

The first point was that as soon as the second source of Islam in any time you want to find out what this one is, you're going to have to read having any book of headings is going to contain

00:04:57--> 00:04:59

the set of terms that we're using when we're studying

00:05:02--> 00:05:03

Third point.

00:05:05--> 00:05:08

Third point is some people use these terms when they write

00:05:10--> 00:05:14

about PIP or other things in the use the terms either incorrectly or without knowledge.

00:05:19--> 00:05:19

points.

00:05:21--> 00:05:23

Those books now the the big collections

00:05:24--> 00:05:27

that they were only my

00:05:30--> 00:05:30

ministry.

00:05:32--> 00:05:35

And nowadays they were the only you can publish

00:05:36--> 00:05:39

and to suppose somebody is supposed to know how to

00:05:42--> 00:05:45

cook, the chef mentioned that it's already their

00:05:48--> 00:05:49

whole life

00:05:50--> 00:05:51

doing this

00:05:54--> 00:06:00

there are some heavy, we can still study nowadays and read. And even more importantly,

00:06:03--> 00:06:06

you need to understand what he said about those, those headings.

00:06:07--> 00:06:11

And in order to understand what he said about the headings, you have to have some knowledge about

00:06:12--> 00:06:15

the for example, you don't only think about headings, you consider setting

00:06:16--> 00:06:18

as important. So you take any,

00:06:19--> 00:06:22

and after the headings, this is what often

00:06:25--> 00:06:25

happens.

00:06:27--> 00:06:28

What do you think about that?

00:06:30--> 00:06:34

You just got to skip it. You got to find this statement and books

00:06:35--> 00:06:35

and books.

00:06:37--> 00:06:42

And all the other sciences are built upon, actually, you cannot avoid them.

00:06:51--> 00:06:52

anybody tried to

00:06:57--> 00:06:58

make whatever they want?

00:07:03--> 00:07:04

There's no question that it's

00:07:07--> 00:07:08

all generations.

00:07:09--> 00:07:13

But I'm not talking about those specialists. I'm talking about this the common person like you or me.

00:07:15--> 00:07:24

I can be just the vocal like purple sooner that everyone uses and discuss some of those terms and some of the things he says and some of the heady and he will help you be familiar with

00:07:25--> 00:07:33

real estate. What do you think? Sometimes the author himself doesn't know what to think. But he quoted it from some book. And he put it the

00:07:34--> 00:07:38

the thing that actually wrote this office and what the author thinks

00:07:45--> 00:07:45

they use

00:07:48--> 00:07:48

sometimes

00:07:51--> 00:07:53

to differentiate between different specialisms.

00:07:59--> 00:08:00

So in the future

00:08:02--> 00:08:03

don't have to look for me

00:08:05--> 00:08:06

or make a statement like that. Just

00:08:08--> 00:08:09

go ahead and respond.

00:08:28--> 00:08:28

Much.

00:08:40--> 00:08:43

All right, yes, because I'm looking at my notes. So

00:08:50--> 00:08:51

we will assume that

00:08:54--> 00:08:58

now we come to the next question is how can someone be confirmed as

00:09:22--> 00:09:23

By the way, there's one question that

00:09:25--> 00:09:26

we'll discuss

00:09:27--> 00:09:28

maybe next time.

00:09:48--> 00:09:51

Northern. So how can someone be confirmed as

00:09:53--> 00:09:53

we

00:09:56--> 00:09:56

indicated two weeks

00:10:02--> 00:10:03

I don't know why but

00:10:09--> 00:10:10

now you look into

00:10:19--> 00:10:20

No wonder

00:10:21--> 00:10:22

students do support

00:10:25--> 00:10:26

being confirmed is

00:10:30--> 00:10:32

one of the ways is by

00:10:42--> 00:10:44

what do I mean by that and discuss

00:10:51--> 00:10:58

his position in transmitting heavies and being as well known, there's no question about

00:11:00--> 00:11:04

it for example, admin handle whatever he was asked about.

00:11:06--> 00:11:08

About the top given

00:11:09--> 00:11:09

away

00:11:19--> 00:11:19

from

00:11:21--> 00:11:26

from level headed, what are the scores of hate, the name is pronounced something.

00:11:29--> 00:11:29

And sometimes

00:11:31--> 00:11:33

most of the time the people have had a different

00:11:37--> 00:11:41

way in Persian means the devil system. So they don't like to call

00:11:43--> 00:11:45

me actually

00:11:47--> 00:11:48

was asked to talk

00:11:50--> 00:11:53

to us well, people like he asked

00:11:54--> 00:11:55

us

00:11:56--> 00:11:59

so people like email medic, even Jaffe

00:12:00--> 00:12:20

the other great schools of Haiti, they are confirmed, they're well known. And also one thing about being famous is that if they do something wrong, that's going to be spread. If someone like medic, was seen drinking wine, some guy everyone's going to know about, everyone's gonna say that.

00:12:23--> 00:12:35

So we added being famous also keeps the person away from doing that. And he has this dead as positioning as responsibility. So he's even more careful about doing calm because he knows everyone is watching.

00:12:36--> 00:12:36

Okay.

00:12:38--> 00:12:39

So that's one way what's the other way?

00:12:48--> 00:12:49

Good thing is

00:12:54--> 00:12:57

first of all, this division, he says other rules

00:13:10--> 00:13:11

don't condition was missing there.

00:13:19--> 00:13:20

And he's someone that we know

00:13:22--> 00:13:23

what what do we talk about less than?

00:13:29--> 00:13:35

One of the one of the things we talk about is the condition for the one who was making Jeff attend the event.

00:13:36--> 00:13:38

This is efficient, to be a critic.

00:13:48--> 00:13:50

question, Is that sufficient

00:13:52--> 00:13:54

to know Him and not as low?

00:13:55--> 00:13:56

We're just talking about this.

00:14:15--> 00:14:19

Either Okay, can I start saying that no later in

00:14:22--> 00:14:23

life, what do

00:14:25--> 00:14:25

you have

00:14:27--> 00:14:34

to meet the other conditions? So not another, or other I don't think that he said, but other people who are qualified

00:14:35--> 00:14:36

in general, I totally get that.

00:14:40--> 00:14:46

Other people who aren't qualified in the sense of what that is saying that is that is not just

00:14:48--> 00:14:50

people who are qualified in the science of jeopardy.

00:14:56--> 00:14:57

Danny, the critic.

00:14:59--> 00:15:00

Not the

00:15:00--> 00:15:00

The

00:15:01--> 00:15:03

Critic is qualified to be critical.

00:15:04--> 00:15:07

Someone was qualified to be credit grade the person has been.

00:15:10--> 00:15:13

And is one so critical. You should know.

00:15:20--> 00:15:21

Someone who

00:15:37--> 00:15:40

is once a visit that one critic

00:15:41--> 00:15:42

says so and so is

00:15:44--> 00:15:44

sufficient.

00:15:57--> 00:16:00

sufficient if there's no one who makes the trade for the front.

00:16:02--> 00:16:02

There's no other

00:16:07--> 00:16:09

no other nothing who needs to do no other critical needs

00:16:24--> 00:16:27

as a good way most most

00:16:29--> 00:16:35

something like this one is sufficient. And if there's no contradiction most leads to

00:16:37--> 00:16:38

at least two credits.

00:16:39--> 00:16:43

Like the witness said, you have to have two people

00:16:44--> 00:16:45

making pythia for him before

00:16:47--> 00:16:47

they make clear.

00:16:49--> 00:16:49

Over.

00:16:51--> 00:16:55

Yes, you mentioned some we mentioned Sofia natori.

00:17:05--> 00:17:09

I'll give you I have a table. I didn't bring it because people never look at it.

00:17:11--> 00:17:14

I have a table of the major critics of each generation.

00:17:22--> 00:17:23

We're not talking about a

00:17:25--> 00:17:37

victim confirmed. Okay. A few of them things. Without any contradiction, we will discuss contradiction. The two scholars to credit scholars have Jeffersonian status, then we

00:17:40--> 00:17:42

know, the question, though,

00:17:44--> 00:17:52

the question that comes up is this disease to critics? Do they have to explain why it is adverse to make the jury for me this?

00:17:59--> 00:18:00

Is your students.

00:18:09--> 00:18:10

If for example,

00:18:17--> 00:18:18

someone has to explain it.

00:18:19--> 00:18:22

If I say Neither do I have to explain why?

00:18:25--> 00:18:27

It is, I think five opinions on this.

00:18:32--> 00:18:35

Well, okay, we will we will extend the question to also

00:18:41--> 00:18:43

the first opinion, opinion of the

00:18:45--> 00:18:46

majority is

00:18:48--> 00:18:50

that we're sending this to both.

00:18:51--> 00:18:53

So in the future, we don't have to discuss

00:18:54--> 00:18:54

again,

00:18:56--> 00:18:57

if you make

00:19:08--> 00:19:10

up the three per hour

00:19:15--> 00:19:20

as you said in the video, the majority of the scars of the spin. That's what I wrote down

00:19:25--> 00:19:26

must be explained.

00:19:41--> 00:19:43

What's the why is this such a popular opinion?

00:19:49--> 00:19:51

To say someone is asking what are you saying at

00:19:53--> 00:19:56

all? So if you're going to explain it, how are you going to say

00:19:58--> 00:19:59

the effect

00:20:00--> 00:20:01

The month of Ramadan.

00:20:04--> 00:20:04

He doesn't

00:20:06--> 00:20:09

he doesn't lie, he doesn't cheat. She doesn't make it easy.

00:20:10--> 00:20:13

So the point that they're making is this idea that is

00:20:16--> 00:20:18

well known, what makes a person?

00:20:19--> 00:20:24

And so therefore only if they're going to explain it, they're going to need 10 pages for each at all because that

00:20:25--> 00:20:25

so

00:20:27--> 00:20:30

bored of us. Why do they think the generator must be?

00:20:33--> 00:20:34

A First of all, I only need one

00:20:38--> 00:20:40

bedroom necklace mistake.

00:20:42--> 00:20:48

What else was another point that critics had in mind why it's a chicken,

00:20:49--> 00:20:50

chicken and also two

00:20:54--> 00:20:55

other critics saying

00:20:57--> 00:21:07

not just protected, but also because sometimes when it comes to the jury, especially for those fixed scholars, they might reject someone. And the reason they reject them is not sufficient.

00:21:12--> 00:21:16

For example, one who talks too much they rejected the score, because he talks too much

00:21:18--> 00:21:18

suspicion about

00:21:22--> 00:21:24

so therefore, they must be explained.

00:21:31--> 00:21:32

That way, why, for example,

00:21:34--> 00:21:36

you might find some narratives that

00:21:38--> 00:21:39

other scores meet the dream for

00:21:42--> 00:21:49

what happened was either that was not explained, and others or their nature was not that effective to

00:21:51--> 00:21:53

have the second the

00:21:58--> 00:21:59

second is the opposite of that.

00:22:01--> 00:22:02

is you need an explanation.

00:22:11--> 00:22:12

You don't need an

00:22:18--> 00:22:20

editorial comment at the beginning of

00:22:22--> 00:22:32

the class, I mentioned that people will sort of they have a tendency to discuss these points also. So this is the opinion of him, I was hoping that he

00:22:38--> 00:22:38

will have.

00:22:48--> 00:22:49

Okay,

00:22:50--> 00:22:52

so this is basically the finish.

00:22:56--> 00:23:03

And the problem with this routine, and they said they are mostly theoreticians, they're not actually, in fact, they did not actually practice

00:23:08--> 00:23:09

resuming last

00:23:18--> 00:23:18

joint.

00:23:36--> 00:23:37

me Wow, can they say that?

00:23:45--> 00:23:47

They don't considerably but what they say and if people might be

00:23:49--> 00:23:54

not shy, but they might hesitate to say something bad about someone else. So

00:23:55--> 00:23:56

Muslim nation

00:23:59--> 00:24:00

that is not a strong opinion.

00:24:05--> 00:24:05

Next,

00:24:06--> 00:24:09

of course, we have the courts and Muslims because the thing is this.

00:24:17--> 00:24:21

Okay, third opinion is you need an explanation for either

00:24:30--> 00:24:31

what's the reasoning and

00:24:33--> 00:24:36

the reasoning for explaining duties is the same as the

00:24:37--> 00:24:40

same reasoning applies, but why do they also the outcomes

00:24:50--> 00:24:51

or

00:24:52--> 00:24:54

perhaps also, there's some degrees of

00:24:57--> 00:24:57

this

00:24:59--> 00:24:59

Yeah.

00:25:00--> 00:25:01

degrees. That could be

00:25:04--> 00:25:04

really, really?

00:25:10--> 00:25:15

Well, the basic argument is that this person may make that year for the wrong reason also,

00:25:16--> 00:25:22

we set up here in lightweight degrees for the wrong reasons. Here we might make, like the person who said,

00:25:24--> 00:25:26

about one of the narratives, admittedly,

00:25:29--> 00:25:31

one person called jacobians. We

00:25:33--> 00:25:43

said about MLM units, I heard that people saying that he is weak. But that's only because the car sit with his father. And if you see his beard, the length of his beard.

00:25:48--> 00:25:51

So he's saying, and if you look at his beard and his nose, he must be.

00:25:52--> 00:25:55

So in other words, he's making daddy for the wrong reason.

00:25:56--> 00:25:57

What's the response to that?

00:25:59--> 00:26:02

And how do these people respond to that? I

00:26:06--> 00:26:07

mean,

00:26:08--> 00:26:15

yeah, they say this is the case, however, they respond to the argument. Maybe the data is for the wrong. And they give that

00:26:18--> 00:26:22

love that it's very rare. But what are the conditions for that? For?

00:26:24--> 00:26:25

That?

00:26:28--> 00:26:30

Guy, obviously, this person was saying, Yeah, you can see his beard and

00:26:32--> 00:26:40

he doesn't know anything about jet with daddy. Right? So the problem is not that he's making that deal for the wrong reason. The problem is he's not qualified to make that leap.

00:26:42--> 00:26:44

So the answer to that is, although this is a good,

00:26:46--> 00:26:46

because it's

00:26:48--> 00:26:48

always good to be safe.

00:26:52--> 00:26:54

staples, of course, when

00:26:55--> 00:26:56

you just say,

00:27:09--> 00:27:10

part one,

00:27:12--> 00:27:13

you have to explain,

00:27:14--> 00:27:15

either.

00:27:19--> 00:27:21

And this is the opinion of

00:27:23--> 00:27:23

the book.

00:27:48--> 00:27:49

What about the

00:28:00--> 00:28:00

people?

00:28:02--> 00:28:03

And many of those who need

00:28:06--> 00:28:10

this, as many of those who mean that these are like the shocking

00:28:16--> 00:28:17

most of the others?

00:28:22--> 00:28:27

No, because he's the only one who has written a complete book about almost every aspect of

00:28:29--> 00:28:30

the book about traveling.

00:28:32--> 00:28:33

He has a book about

00:28:34--> 00:28:39

taking heavy he has a book about someone people who used to know how to visit the Forgotten

00:28:40--> 00:28:44

almost anything you could imagine he hasn't had the book of us. So he

00:28:45--> 00:28:46

should remember his name.

00:28:50--> 00:28:51

What is

00:28:54--> 00:29:00

enough for this condition for the critics has to meet for him to be sifted,

00:29:01--> 00:29:02

explained.

00:29:05--> 00:29:06

Does anyone understand

00:29:10--> 00:29:20

the reasons for the reasons for tabular well known among the scores. So the score is someone knows me there's no reason to ask him to explain

00:29:26--> 00:29:26

that but

00:29:27--> 00:29:30

we know not to be like manic

00:29:35--> 00:29:36

isn't explained.

00:29:37--> 00:29:39

That's why the explanation is always better.

00:29:41--> 00:29:44

But here's what if another theory was also one of these.

00:29:45--> 00:29:46

This opinion he wrote,

00:29:54--> 00:29:58

it is not necessary to mention the reason in either case

00:29:59--> 00:30:00

because of the

00:30:00--> 00:30:03

person is not an expert in the field that has done with that deal will be rejected.

00:30:05--> 00:30:08

And if he is an expert, then there's no need to ask him about

00:30:14--> 00:30:18

that he knows that he was

00:30:22--> 00:30:23

assumed that

00:30:25--> 00:30:26

he would

00:30:27--> 00:30:27

give us assume that

00:30:29--> 00:30:29

we will

00:30:33--> 00:30:40

be the scholars of Kava danila. You can check what you said with what other scholars saying if they disagree a lot.

00:30:43--> 00:30:45

But what's the what's the bone with this?

00:30:48--> 00:30:51

Why is this not the opinion of the majority?

00:30:57--> 00:30:57

All the other

00:30:58--> 00:31:00

human errors can be

00:31:04--> 00:31:07

when you when you talk about the

00:31:08--> 00:31:09

matter of

00:31:11--> 00:31:19

the matter of applying principles. And if you do not show people how you're applying the principles, there's no way for us really to see whether or not you're

00:31:31--> 00:31:31

headed.

00:31:37--> 00:31:37

Now

00:31:40--> 00:31:44

it says that the if someone is categorized as

00:31:48--> 00:31:49

someone

00:31:52--> 00:31:53

categorize

00:32:02--> 00:32:05

and then someone says so it makes the date for the same person,

00:32:07--> 00:32:10

then the jury will not be accepted without explanation.

00:32:24--> 00:32:31

Someone has stated but in scores to be added, then the judge will not be accepted without explanation.

00:32:32--> 00:32:32

Makes sense? The

00:32:35--> 00:32:37

first thing that we've discussed so far that makes sense.

00:32:43--> 00:32:44

What's the problem with this

00:32:46--> 00:32:49

from what somebody said to be

00:32:50--> 00:32:51

the problem was is is it

00:32:53--> 00:32:55

not a big fan the whole

00:33:02--> 00:33:05

me buy this is not some cover all the possible cases.

00:33:10--> 00:33:14

To make sense, the best thing is that this one goes with this

00:33:16--> 00:33:19

person. The first one is going to

00:33:20--> 00:33:22

give us the corollary to the first one

00:33:23--> 00:33:24

because by itself is an

00:33:25--> 00:33:26

uncomfortable

00:33:31--> 00:33:38

one says that the jury has displayed in all circumstances that is

00:33:39--> 00:33:42

what what is what is basically saying is that the jury

00:33:44--> 00:33:45

will not be accepted.

00:33:46--> 00:33:49

In general if someone has stayed together except explain

00:33:55--> 00:33:57

as these are proven.

00:33:58--> 00:34:01

For example, he has in mind that about shopping

00:34:07--> 00:34:10

to see I mean what's what's the evidence for that because all

00:34:18--> 00:34:21

scores are more jealous of each other than the goats.

00:34:31--> 00:34:33

Go to the zoo we see that some of the

00:34:44--> 00:34:46

European and American

00:34:49--> 00:34:49

Zoo

00:34:59--> 00:34:59

all right

00:35:00--> 00:35:00

Got

00:35:02--> 00:35:03

any questions about

00:35:14--> 00:35:14

this one is

00:35:19--> 00:35:19

because

00:35:22--> 00:35:23

there is another one hate them

00:35:26--> 00:35:26

against

00:35:32--> 00:35:34

certain terminology for example, if I say

00:35:35--> 00:35:38

hi, that means many other books.

00:35:40--> 00:35:41

That means,

00:35:42--> 00:35:42

if you mean

00:35:44--> 00:35:44

and also you're

00:35:47--> 00:35:48

not alone

00:36:02--> 00:36:03

The first one

00:36:05--> 00:36:06

that they used to make

00:36:08--> 00:36:09

doing this and this was

00:36:11--> 00:36:12

definitely funny

00:36:14--> 00:36:14

things.

00:36:18--> 00:36:19

Remember, most of the

00:36:20--> 00:36:24

things are happening while the people are alive. So they have the chance to respond.

00:36:31--> 00:36:32

agrees with the first

00:36:37--> 00:36:37

one.

00:36:40--> 00:36:49

Again, it has to be doesn't have to be something that nobody says. Yeah, I think as always with the second point is with

00:36:54--> 00:36:55

any questions about

00:36:57--> 00:36:58

how to confirm someone?

00:37:07--> 00:37:18

Yeah, Danny, the way someone is confirmed to be either either by fame or by to critics of sustaining him to be under that, that I will have to be explained or not.

00:37:20--> 00:37:21

When we come to

00:37:24--> 00:37:30

the same thing applies to scores make him do they have to say are not the same?

00:37:34--> 00:37:34

There are

00:37:35--> 00:37:38

two ways either by being by two

00:37:43--> 00:37:44

perfect except

00:37:45--> 00:37:46

what is the minimum?

00:37:48--> 00:37:53

Okay, they differentiated in between. It's not always good.

00:37:56--> 00:37:57

When when there's

00:37:59--> 00:38:00

one or two mistakes

00:38:08--> 00:38:12

he was from the people who asked them and he was from the scholars room.

00:38:28--> 00:38:30

Yeah, you can find it in the in the books of

00:38:32--> 00:38:32

the Bible.

00:38:33--> 00:38:34

For example.

00:38:42--> 00:38:43

Debbie has something like 25

00:38:46--> 00:38:51

books, six books, there's something like 12,000 15,000

00:38:58--> 00:38:59

nowadays more

00:39:01--> 00:39:02

so than any

00:39:12--> 00:39:12

job.

00:39:15--> 00:39:16

Go back to the

00:39:21--> 00:39:26

critique and you are using the knowledge of the earliest sometimes to discuss them that maybe

00:39:27--> 00:39:34

earlier scholars mentioned, discuss, they discuss it again to make sure that their opinion was correct and see if they need me because what are the

00:39:45--> 00:39:47

people that I trust

00:39:58--> 00:39:59

has the

00:40:00--> 00:40:02

25 volumes, published

00:40:07--> 00:40:08

25 points.

00:40:10--> 00:40:14

Some of these have not been discussed, some of this has not been discussed.

00:40:19--> 00:40:19

To me,

00:40:21--> 00:40:23

hates me, he discussed many of them.

00:40:26--> 00:40:27

But he did not really discuss them in detail.

00:40:29--> 00:40:33

There's even a Muslim, the last one No. Bye.

00:40:50--> 00:40:52

This is the largest Muslims that we know.

00:40:55--> 00:40:58

And many of the ideas that have not been published

00:41:03--> 00:41:03

yet

00:41:28--> 00:41:28

last year,

00:41:32--> 00:41:39

particular game, and in the future is different from any of the other books. Yeah, that's right.

00:41:44--> 00:41:45

Any other questions?

00:41:50--> 00:41:52

So, somebody

00:41:56--> 00:41:59

also has a collection for

00:42:04--> 00:42:05

food.

00:42:06--> 00:42:07

It also is also

00:42:15--> 00:42:16

importance of

00:42:17--> 00:42:17

playing.

00:42:30--> 00:42:33

Listen, I wanted to say that it's also

00:42:41--> 00:42:41

Yes.

00:42:46--> 00:42:49

If you remember electrical problems before it came as

00:42:51--> 00:42:59

one of the major reasons, some of them did not know how to use and other people know, or they knew it through a weak chain, and therefore they didn't apply. Well, other people knew

00:43:03--> 00:43:03

would be

00:43:06--> 00:43:09

the subject that shifts the title of the lecture.

00:43:10--> 00:43:12

And he did not discuss that.

00:43:24--> 00:43:26

Okay, here's some miscellaneous questions concerning

00:43:29--> 00:43:30

like a pop quiz.

00:43:34--> 00:43:35

The narrator

00:43:37--> 00:43:37

either, so

00:43:40--> 00:43:42

may you conclude the TSP me?

00:43:54--> 00:43:56

Okay, let's put it this way. This class will look older than

00:44:01--> 00:44:06

the person who stepped up but he stayed with me for a very short time we're not experts.

00:44:07--> 00:44:11

Or he was very young when he is with the Zodiac. Why did you stay long? Did not

00:44:14--> 00:44:14

not long.

00:44:21--> 00:44:25

So this person has stepped up. But yeah, I mean, most of us.

00:44:27--> 00:44:27

We don't

00:44:31--> 00:44:32

examine from

00:44:33--> 00:44:34

Well, this

00:44:35--> 00:44:42

is a special report the great scores of all of them, we can break down their students into these categories

00:44:46--> 00:44:55

in general, but when it comes to his narrations from he is one example of the scholar by the name of pushing and pushing

00:45:07--> 00:45:07

Ah

00:45:20--> 00:45:22

machine you will find this array

00:45:24--> 00:45:28

is better but you'll never find use one of these two you'll never find

00:45:31--> 00:45:36

because in the heaviest of Azov he was not strong and he was very young and efficient.

00:45:37--> 00:45:40

So we do not accept this Henry Ford inherited from

00:45:42--> 00:45:44

us that he might have

00:45:45--> 00:45:49

after he left he lost some of his mental capabilities made more mistakes

00:45:51--> 00:45:52

but we said sometimes

00:45:54--> 00:45:57

that reversal universal class

00:46:00--> 00:46:01

is older than five

00:46:09--> 00:46:17

but what you're what you're what you're describing is something in the later years anyway, we said we just give him a book. And he has the right to read from that book.

00:46:18--> 00:46:19

Okay, now we're talking about 30 years

00:46:26--> 00:46:27

before he became good and it

00:46:29--> 00:46:36

takes a little while to get to start to peace of mind is not mine. Who

00:46:38--> 00:46:41

gave me what the head is now with this man. And even if you wrote them down,

00:46:42--> 00:46:53

some of you will write them down long and so forth. But if after one year to keep doing it, you start recognizing the change who was whose students you don't make them up you know, who was

00:46:54--> 00:46:55

Yeah, you know, the who's who

00:46:59--> 00:47:05

are they in general, but they stayed with us it for a long time.

00:47:09--> 00:47:11

And they are experts.

00:47:12--> 00:47:21

I stayed with him for years and he has a bad memory. But when you give him the same thing for 40 years every day he starts to pick it up. So these days in general, but

00:47:33--> 00:47:34

what

00:47:41--> 00:47:45

does that mean? He's the power we suppose any no matter who we never

00:47:46--> 00:47:50

know for example, sorry, we can divide by categories.

00:47:55--> 00:47:56

For example,

00:47:57--> 00:47:59

okay, she was a student that was earning

00:48:02--> 00:48:05

and love is a third party which you'll never see her shame.

00:48:08--> 00:48:09

Yeah, for these people,

00:48:11--> 00:48:11

only

00:48:19--> 00:48:19

about

00:48:21--> 00:48:22

you will find

00:48:24--> 00:48:25

the finding

00:48:26--> 00:48:31

the first category, the second category, you will not find them.

00:48:35--> 00:48:38

The third category there are basically we can call them

00:48:40--> 00:48:45

and you will find people in this category of adults and the third many in books.

00:48:47--> 00:48:47

Okay.

00:48:49--> 00:48:52

The four categories are people who are life in general

00:48:58--> 00:48:59

will define

00:49:00--> 00:49:00

the general

00:49:03--> 00:49:03

overview

00:49:09--> 00:49:10

for one

00:49:12--> 00:49:13

zero

00:49:19--> 00:49:26

and the last category are people who are rejected under any circumstance, liars fortress of hate any

00:49:29--> 00:49:30

muscle keep

00:49:31--> 00:49:31

that.

00:49:35--> 00:49:35

What's the

00:49:39--> 00:49:40

difference between

00:49:41--> 00:49:49

someone who has a little weakness and he's supported by other people that exactly the same way? We may raise his head to a higher level.

00:49:51--> 00:49:52

But this category No.

00:49:57--> 00:49:59

This isn't going to say oh, you

00:50:05--> 00:50:11

What did they wish? They are people? Not good characters. Now they can say, you know, I'm one of the somebody students

00:50:21--> 00:50:22

they said was

00:50:28--> 00:50:29

they are

00:50:33--> 00:50:34

talking about this category.

00:50:36--> 00:50:36

Second,

00:50:38--> 00:50:40

okay, this is for not a long time.

00:50:43--> 00:50:47

They did not stay with somebody for a long time. In other words, their knowledge

00:50:50--> 00:50:53

but the knowledge and other people's ideas are good.

00:50:59--> 00:51:00

For

00:51:01--> 00:51:11

me, it depends on the person, some people are experts, because he, he will memorize what the person said. Other people know, they have to say

00:51:13--> 00:51:13

so, depends on the

00:51:19--> 00:51:22

like to welcome you to the continuation of our English

00:51:33--> 00:51:34

was the question

00:51:36--> 00:51:41

the narrator does not need a stable cutter Samuelson. Can we conclude that he is not?

00:51:43--> 00:51:43

Happy?

00:51:49--> 00:51:50

Okay, let's

00:51:51--> 00:51:51

add the medic.

00:51:53--> 00:51:53

Again, there was nothing

00:51:56--> 00:51:57

to include just

00:52:00--> 00:52:03

to include the all authentic had you throw something there isn't?

00:52:07--> 00:52:07

suppose

00:52:09--> 00:52:10

there's no one who's scoring

00:52:13--> 00:52:21

any merits? Someone who doesn't mean? Like for example, definitely or someone who I have no doubt about?

00:52:23--> 00:52:24

has told me.

00:52:26--> 00:52:27

So in other words, he didn't give us the name.

00:52:32--> 00:52:34

Any someone I have moved up.

00:52:40--> 00:52:41

The question

00:52:42--> 00:52:43

is What about the

00:52:46--> 00:52:47

champion?

00:52:55--> 00:52:56

Because he has won?

00:52:58--> 00:52:58

Because

00:52:59--> 00:53:00

he will not say anything.

00:53:01--> 00:53:02

Knock.

00:53:28--> 00:53:28

Here's a question that

00:53:32--> 00:53:37

someone might be important to remember. Because what he knows about him

00:53:39--> 00:53:40

but someone else

00:53:43--> 00:53:45

someone else that may have

00:53:46--> 00:53:50

some information that the membership doesn't have. Right?

00:53:52--> 00:53:55

So in other words, we know all you have is a scholar.

00:53:56--> 00:53:58

So General tab you also.

00:53:59--> 00:54:07

But when Yanni he says about someone that if he doesn't name that person, the problem is that it might be someone who he considers

00:54:08--> 00:54:10

that he may not be.

00:54:11--> 00:54:17

So although the score disagree on this point, some people aren't like you, they will accept

00:54:18--> 00:54:19

the score.

00:54:20--> 00:54:23

But the safer the stronger opinion

00:54:24--> 00:54:28

that he has a question that he has. If he does not mention him,

00:54:29--> 00:54:30

then strong opinions.

00:54:33--> 00:54:42

Now there's some source, some scars only. Next question, isn't it a famous case? person?

00:54:44--> 00:54:44

famous case

00:54:46--> 00:54:48

His name is somewhere in this chapter.

00:54:49--> 00:54:52

Job is the only scholar who said this person is the

00:54:55--> 00:54:58

Narrator The oldest scholar who concluded that

00:55:06--> 00:55:08

And even though we

00:55:10--> 00:55:11

remember

00:55:16--> 00:55:18

when he said about delivery, shall we?

00:55:20--> 00:55:21

Some people say

00:55:23--> 00:55:27

they said that he was talking about his uncle.

00:55:32--> 00:55:33

Suppose an adult

00:55:37--> 00:55:39

the only one who says that what's

00:55:46--> 00:55:47

missing is

00:55:48--> 00:55:51

an example of a case where

00:55:52--> 00:55:59

this is evidence that we should not accept anyone statement if he says Danny had any book or without mentioning who the person

00:56:00--> 00:56:02

that he was the question of which he had.

00:56:03--> 00:56:05

My my point was, there was a person that

00:56:07--> 00:56:10

doesn't even let time because that matters.

00:56:12--> 00:56:14

In general, there's the

00:56:16--> 00:56:24

gun in general, people know who who is talking about his students, no one was talking about, for example, the mathematics that

00:56:26--> 00:56:27

means arbitrary

00:56:31--> 00:56:32

destiny is

00:56:41--> 00:56:42

so they know how to example.

00:56:44--> 00:56:45

Economic

00:56:47--> 00:56:50

students know who we talking about. That's a different game.

00:56:56--> 00:56:58

In front of me right here, what did they say?

00:57:02--> 00:57:05

Everyone knows who's talking about. So it's like giving

00:57:06--> 00:57:07

more of a

00:57:08--> 00:57:12

don't even use his name anymore. You just call him that?

00:57:13--> 00:57:15

Everyone knows. So let's just in one

00:57:22--> 00:57:25

case, and if the students know what he's talking about, then we can.

00:57:34--> 00:57:36

Yeah, so for me, I read the

00:57:39--> 00:57:44

shows, and I have no idea who is talking about. I would have to say I cannot be selfless.

00:57:45--> 00:57:49

I don't say if we don't say but I cannot make judgment on it until I find out who that person.

00:57:53--> 00:57:55

And that's the footnote right here. It says

00:57:57--> 00:57:58

suppose the

00:57:59--> 00:58:04

narrator narrates and someone you mentioned that person, for example, suppose

00:58:06--> 00:58:07

that doesn't mean?

00:58:12--> 00:58:13

Does that mean that she is

00:58:17--> 00:58:19

the closest competitor?

00:58:20--> 00:58:20

Because

00:58:23--> 00:58:28

I've never really had it from someone. Does that mean in my point of view that this person was supposed to do that?

00:58:38--> 00:58:39

That means

00:58:44--> 00:58:48

someone's narrating and someone else with authority imply that this person is

00:58:50--> 00:58:50

even if

00:58:52--> 00:58:53

it doesn't happen?

00:59:07--> 00:59:09

Okay, let's go to the File.

00:59:13--> 00:59:13

system.

00:59:25--> 00:59:26

Principle

00:59:27--> 00:59:33

isn't the case. But if someone has stepped up and he knows about general varies from someone else,

00:59:34--> 00:59:35

does that mean the other person

00:59:41--> 00:59:43

may say yes. Did you say

00:59:44--> 00:59:44

did you

00:59:47--> 00:59:54

know? In a way, okay, you say yes. To this, you will say no, why not? Because he could

00:59:57--> 00:59:57

not

00:59:59--> 00:59:59

be

01:00:00--> 01:00:00

To

01:00:07--> 01:00:07

condition

01:00:19--> 01:00:20

okay.

01:00:23--> 01:00:24

Okay shouldn't be saved that

01:00:32--> 01:00:35

this would make any sense at all everyone I come to

01:00:42--> 01:00:45

on Monday I gave a lecture about Ecuador

01:00:47--> 01:00:52

I mentioned some then on Thursday if I mentioned these areas I don't have mentioned again but this one's

01:00:54--> 01:00:54

super tuition

01:00:57--> 01:00:57

earlier

01:01:00--> 01:01:01

somewhere

01:01:06--> 01:01:09

that first of all with respect to weakened areas

01:01:14--> 01:01:15

as someone who has asthma

01:01:16--> 01:01:17

but not 100%

01:01:22--> 01:01:28

Okay, Johnny is its own little wallet in fact you will be called by

01:01:47--> 01:01:49

know why would I do races Hey you

01:01:50--> 01:01:51

got to

01:01:54--> 01:01:56

be honest but make mistakes

01:01:57--> 01:01:58

so why would I narrate this

01:02:00--> 01:02:15

maybe to support other teams okay is to support more now in order to know the penny in order to if there is some other support someone has the same idea to a different department. So what do you have to carry this week we still have to pass on this petty

01:02:17--> 01:02:19

we also do it through any sponsors mistake

01:02:22--> 01:02:22

oh thank you

01:02:29--> 01:02:31

meaning of it because

01:02:33--> 01:02:34

my wife

01:02:39--> 01:02:42

is weak when it comes to his policy

01:02:44--> 01:02:46

but he is I mean

01:02:49--> 01:02:51

he stays away from a more remote

01:02:52--> 01:02:53

as well as me

01:03:02--> 01:03:02

Yeah.

01:03:05--> 01:03:06

I mean, I can we assume that

01:03:08--> 01:03:09

No,

01:03:11--> 01:03:12

not me, not me. I'm

01:03:14--> 01:03:15

talking about the world.

01:03:19--> 01:03:21

Know what I'm saying? Is

01:03:23--> 01:03:24

we still married Is it

01:03:25--> 01:03:28

okay, because Danny we know that in

01:03:29--> 01:03:39

the comments he makes mistakes. So if we can remove this possibility of error by finding the same people and they support each other that we conclude the script

01:03:47--> 01:03:49

because they thought that you said

01:03:52--> 01:03:52

Yeah.

01:03:55--> 01:03:56

Yeah, you want

01:04:02--> 01:04:02

to

01:04:05--> 01:04:09

narrate from night then we assume the night of must be

01:04:14--> 01:04:15

what was the mission?

01:04:17--> 01:04:19

Okay, I'm saying that if I

01:04:21--> 01:04:23

I still may narrate a four week narrative.

01:04:25--> 01:04:30

I still know people who are not especially if there are others but not

01:04:31--> 01:04:33

in order to know that every

01:04:34--> 01:04:40

guy needs the promise with his editors. We know that he must lie that he may have made a mistake from

01:04:41--> 01:04:43

okay so he made a mistake.

01:04:45--> 01:04:49

Now we find someone else like I'm so similar to him make more mistakes.

01:04:55--> 01:04:56

Okay, now I never

01:04:59--> 01:05:00

will be there will be forever

01:05:01--> 01:05:03

But I have to pass it on to the next generation.

01:05:05--> 01:05:07

So what we find is that this narration

01:05:11--> 01:05:13

is supported by marriage.

01:05:14--> 01:05:17

So we can conclude that this is not one of life's mistakes

01:05:18--> 01:05:21

because episode supports him in exactly the same way that he

01:05:29--> 01:05:30

checks

01:05:32--> 01:05:39

So, since we have to check the other team that means we have to continue to pay so even though it means we have to continue to

01:05:44--> 01:05:56

know what I'm saying went back to the original question is that we cannot assume just because I'm sick as everyone I'm hearing from because I will still be narrating from week narrator's for this reason

01:05:59--> 01:06:00

number two

01:06:01--> 01:06:03

maybe I don't know the corner

01:06:05--> 01:06:06

but I don't know if it's the corner

01:06:10--> 01:06:10

case

01:06:11--> 01:06:15

this case assuming you know that he hasn't already knows that he's weak but he's still there.

01:06:16--> 01:06:17

But he doesn't

01:06:22--> 01:06:25

know what are we gonna

01:06:26--> 01:06:29

get along as we give you all the information

01:06:31--> 01:06:32

we may not use it as a proof

01:06:33--> 01:06:37

Okay, the difference between testing and using highly sensitive words

01:06:39--> 01:06:46

because I don't know if we still or not I cannot use the Edit as a proof but I can pass it on as information that this person says is so bad.

01:06:48--> 01:06:50

So the narrator or the narrator may not know

01:06:56--> 01:07:01

so therefore even though it doesn't mean that when I'm there any from all of them

01:07:02--> 01:07:05

there are some scholars of any of those who are known

01:07:06--> 01:07:11

they were known to only narrow a need for people with a considered visa

01:07:14--> 01:07:17

for example even medic with respect to the people who inherited from Medina

01:07:19--> 01:07:24

my mother would never marry anyone from the GM was weak he would only narrow

01:07:28--> 01:07:30

not that long at the week

01:07:32--> 01:07:34

no worries no worries you just apply this

01:07:43--> 01:07:43

week

01:07:47--> 01:07:48

even a

01:07:49--> 01:07:50

week

01:07:52--> 01:07:52

yeah, I

01:07:54--> 01:07:55

don't know.

01:07:58--> 01:07:58

I don't know.

01:07:59--> 01:08:00

Yeah.

01:08:02--> 01:08:03

That I will not use it as

01:08:04--> 01:08:14

he says I don't know. But I will pass it on to recorded my book and pass it on to other people. And those people may know that person

01:08:18--> 01:08:19

of course No, I've

01:08:27--> 01:08:28

never

01:08:31--> 01:08:34

had it on with me I may not know that night.

01:08:39--> 01:08:41

And another reason that they used to do it

01:08:43--> 01:08:44

is to record the

01:08:45--> 01:08:51

knowledge to know the the chain in order to know the any of the

01:08:52--> 01:08:54

the way the head is assessed.

01:08:58--> 01:08:59

Give you a story from

01:09:00--> 01:09:00

blink.

01:09:02--> 01:09:09

Yeah, he used to record the history of mama and a van.

01:09:22--> 01:09:24

I used to record the

01:09:26--> 01:09:27

event. I can

01:09:30--> 01:09:34

record this Eddie, Eddie. And he used to tell these people this

01:09:37--> 01:09:37

man

01:09:42--> 01:09:43

this really

01:09:44--> 01:09:46

stupid head used to do these to keep an eye on the one who's recording.

01:09:49--> 01:09:52

So okay, so I'm in Hamburg as the mayor here. Why are you recording this?

01:09:57--> 01:09:57

Oh, okay.

01:10:00--> 01:10:00

appointment

01:10:05--> 01:10:06

he was one of the

01:10:12--> 01:10:12

event

01:10:21--> 01:10:28

so he asked him Okay, why are you doing this? So he entered him is it all about the love

01:10:33--> 01:10:34

for those who are listening

01:10:35--> 01:10:48

he said I write these pages and I memorize all these headaches and I know that they are fabricated but they do so in order for no one to come along later and change this neck from service and

01:10:49--> 01:10:54

then wants to know exactly what it is Who are the people in this net How is it being

01:10:55--> 01:10:57

used service that

01:10:59--> 01:11:01

can be changed from event to

01:11:02--> 01:11:05

event was important to step two is

01:11:08--> 01:11:09

to just to know that it

01:11:11--> 01:11:15

exists to know any this person is weak very weak but he's narrating in this way

01:11:18--> 01:11:20

but also to know that they may take it for people who are not

01:11:22--> 01:11:23

to keep

01:11:26--> 01:11:31

the story about someone who has done something like 1500 petty nasty

01:11:33--> 01:11:33

all

01:11:35--> 01:11:37

now whenever you hear them you know they've ever

01:11:39--> 01:11:39

had, you

01:11:41--> 01:11:43

know, getting to know the weekend goes

01:12:07--> 01:12:07

what's up

01:12:17--> 01:12:18

from life?

01:12:28--> 01:12:28

So

01:12:36--> 01:12:39

let's binary from from Nice,

01:12:41--> 01:12:42

nice, nice

01:12:43--> 01:12:43

thing

01:12:45--> 01:12:46

is this guy

01:12:50--> 01:12:51

here first of all,

01:12:53--> 01:12:54

suppose you forgot that he

01:12:57--> 01:12:58

remember you told me this idea.

01:13:01--> 01:13:02

Maybe

01:13:03--> 01:13:04

five years ago, he said

01:13:12--> 01:13:13

and he told me that

01:13:17--> 01:13:17

you

01:13:20--> 01:13:20

the biggest one.

01:13:28--> 01:13:30

There's nothing wrong with that

01:13:31--> 01:13:33

situation, there are some headings you will find them

01:13:35--> 01:13:38

where the scholar says, for example,

01:13:40--> 01:13:42

the scholars named Sohail

01:13:46--> 01:13:47

who his students would

01:13:51--> 01:14:00

have forgotten, afterwards, used to narrate a name via narrated it on my authority, and he is

01:14:08--> 01:14:09

responsible.

01:14:10--> 01:14:21

And they just want to pay the probability that the shift provided is greater than the probability that the narrator says he heard from this year. How did they conclude that I'm not sure?

01:14:25--> 01:14:28

Because she has more than 10 students.

01:14:33--> 01:14:34

But what about the other case now?

01:14:38--> 01:14:39

Suppose suppose,

01:14:44--> 01:14:44

he says this

01:14:46--> 01:14:47

definitely

01:14:48--> 01:14:50

doesn't work. What's up

01:15:09--> 01:15:09

Well

01:15:11--> 01:15:13

econometric study showing this

01:15:15--> 01:15:16

now the other key

01:15:21--> 01:15:22

when I said I never said

01:15:25--> 01:15:25

that's the problem

01:15:27--> 01:15:28

What do we do in this case?

01:15:31--> 01:15:34

Can we can check to see who is correct but

01:15:36--> 01:15:37

the first case is he said

01:15:39--> 01:15:42

certain cases categorically denied

01:15:44--> 01:15:44

What

01:15:46--> 01:15:52

do we say that life can now we make it easy for him do we make me do it

01:16:02--> 01:16:03

okay what about the first equation

01:16:05--> 01:16:08

see now he can call me a liar and I can call him a liar

01:16:10--> 01:16:14

so what happens in a case like this we don't make the secret either one we know one of them

01:16:16--> 01:16:21

and if this happens a lot especially with a certain ship then we know that this happens

01:16:24--> 01:16:27

but at the same time we don't we we

01:16:28--> 01:16:32

wait wait for further clarification until other sources

01:16:38--> 01:16:38

No, we will not.

01:16:40--> 01:16:41

We will narrow it when there is

01:16:43--> 01:16:45

a mention but we will not say that

01:16:48--> 01:16:49

until we feel

01:16:55--> 01:17:02

and by the way that sort of put me down in a cod have all written books about people who narrated hate and then later they forgot that

01:17:06--> 01:17:08

God is always the third

01:17:24--> 01:17:27

choice I suppose there's someone who has

01:17:30--> 01:17:31

that we don't know anything.

01:17:32--> 01:17:33

We just know for example a

01:17:37--> 01:17:38

ring the Royal

01:17:40--> 01:17:41

we don't know this person

01:17:44--> 01:17:45

always

01:17:48--> 01:17:49

you

01:17:57--> 01:18:00

know in this case it is like hit up a load face.

01:18:01--> 01:18:04

know who we are. We know who he is but we don't really know

01:18:13--> 01:18:13

the

01:18:16--> 01:18:18

35 different opinions about whatever it is

01:18:24--> 01:18:25

the important thing is to know

01:18:38--> 01:18:39

guys officer

01:18:44--> 01:18:46

eggs wages this month we're doing

01:18:48--> 01:18:48

have

01:18:52--> 01:18:52

come on

01:18:57--> 01:19:01

there anything wrong with taking away numbers getting paid?

01:19:11--> 01:19:12

A little bit

01:19:13--> 01:19:16

from the caller because they make a

01:19:30--> 01:19:31

third point.

01:19:33--> 01:19:38

I mean, do we accept them as our or can we can we say that can be sensible?

01:19:40--> 01:19:44

Okay, it is allowed to take money for teaching. Yes.

01:19:49--> 01:19:57

Long as a billion is good. You're going to take money because the promises system says the thing that you have most like the most like big money for teaching

01:20:01--> 01:20:01

From the

01:20:03--> 01:20:05

Yeah, we don't care where the money is from right now.

01:20:08--> 01:20:17

Okay, what we can conclude concerning the one who takes money to marry, we cannot conclude that just because it takes money is unacceptable.

01:20:30--> 01:20:30

Let's have a

01:20:34--> 01:20:40

look at like a teaching karate wants to make up the series to be a bigger teacher and have more more people who

01:20:44--> 01:20:49

can most most of the earliest cause is headed by the way they supported themselves.

01:20:50--> 01:20:52

Because they were businessmen.

01:20:53--> 01:20:54

And then

01:20:55--> 01:20:56

there was like a

01:20:58--> 01:21:01

24 hour day, it was a 24 hour day and we would

01:21:02--> 01:21:03

use it.

01:21:04--> 01:21:07

Many of the teachers if they were

01:21:12--> 01:21:12

okay.

01:21:15--> 01:21:18

It'd be simpler than it used to have got one month one

01:21:21--> 01:21:24

pick up the phone and send me a fax

01:21:28--> 01:21:30

before any needs to have the right to edit.

01:21:32--> 01:21:33

A good cause disease is

01:21:40--> 01:21:41

the kind of thing that

01:21:42--> 01:21:44

goes to a farmer and so the

01:21:46--> 01:21:50

farmer may tend to go up to six, and they don't come back into learn

01:21:56--> 01:21:59

what you need to have and how much time it takes to get what

01:22:01--> 01:22:02

we were talking about.

01:22:05--> 01:22:06

was rich.

01:22:08--> 01:22:09

He used to support the students

01:22:17--> 01:22:18

because someone was good.

01:22:19--> 01:22:22

He would say I hate this person. And don't accept this for me.

01:22:34--> 01:22:36

Let me say

01:22:42--> 01:22:49

so yeah, just because just because someone is taking money any particular headache we can conclude just because let me know.

01:22:55--> 01:22:55

Okay.

01:22:58--> 01:23:00

Well, basically I've been talking about

01:23:08--> 01:23:08

teaching.

01:23:20--> 01:23:28

Then in the early years Daddy, what do you mean by daring teaching is about the same thing, someone systems and since a certain time that he will give any

01:23:33--> 01:23:33

nowadays

01:24:08--> 01:24:10

because there are so many,

01:24:49--> 01:24:52

especially if you're alive. Now when we look back at it,

01:24:53--> 01:24:55

and it looks more

01:24:57--> 01:24:58

difficult than was in

01:24:59--> 01:24:59

between

01:25:00--> 01:25:02

People who are actually involved in these things

01:25:03--> 01:25:04

are much clearer to them than

01:25:07--> 01:25:08

looking back

01:25:20--> 01:25:22

to be used as evidence for something

01:25:25--> 01:25:27

not to be a loser

01:25:40--> 01:25:42

at the difference between existing

01:25:47--> 01:25:48

versus former heading towards

01:25:55--> 01:25:55

that point

01:26:04--> 01:26:05

how can you make

01:26:06--> 01:26:07

a copy

01:26:09--> 01:26:10

of what you come up with?

01:26:18--> 01:26:19

Difficult

01:26:26--> 01:26:27

to shift students

01:26:38--> 01:26:39

to be surprised

01:26:42--> 01:26:43

because it's not easy to

01:26:49--> 01:26:49

use

01:26:53--> 01:26:54

to kick