Channel: Jamal Zarabozo
© No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever. Transcripts are auto-generated and thus will be be inaccurate. We are working on a system to allow volunteers to edit transcripts in a controlled system.
Last time wasn't history but to see less chance to ask.
So now we'll start with the we're finally getting
your order we're going to go into, we're going to go through.
We said last time, these are the four agreed upon.
are going to start today, obviously with
the first one to put on.
Well, yesterday I was in Denver, and
Dr. Gaines, from CU Boulder gave a lecture.
The Islamic view of oppression and freedom was something that protest.
Talk actually he spoke, he gave the ideas to people when I've loved his surgeon, who's
a Shia scholar and the other one man.
And one of the things that he quoted from him yesterday and one of the books that Rockman wrote
and wrote, he says that the Quran
and it should not be looked at as a love book. But the Quran is a source of faith.
And in that book, he argues, if you look at the fraud, if you look at the laws of the Quran as not laws, and don't think of them as laws, but as guidance.
What do you think, and this is a typical argument of the of the modern school,
feeling better tomorrow.
But feeling better tomorrow shall have the lecture in the mosque tomorrow evening, we'll be on certainly a movement or modernist movement.
And what they're trying to do really is divorce the laws of Islam from from from Israel.
And he seems that don't look at the laws in the Quran as laws to be applied.
But they are like guidance, things that we can get lessons from.
And we don't take them too literally so that we can apply the lessons from them. And in particular, he was talking about
some of the issues concerning women in Islam, and how they should be changed nowadays, by not taking the Quran. Literally.
One problem with their argument is that what he is saying is that the Prophet Mohammed Salim himself did not understand how to fly the Quran
was the Quran itself take this approach to stain the Quran, we're talking about this when we talk about the hood, he
does his duty to explain the Quran. And the public has showed us that the laws in the Quran are in fact laws that are to be applied literally as they are stated
in the Quran.
So as I said, when we studied, one of the benefits of spending
is that the arguments
of the people who we can say, are trying to bring new things who are deviating from the to Islam, we can recognize the arguments, he thinks that the laws and the Quran or the laws must be treated as long as actually while in the situation is the opposite. And also as a Muslim, Hannah with God is the only log of
all the laws or the authority for any law goes back to almost a penalty.
And we'll talk about that more when we talk about a heck of more who is who is the login
and even the policy I sent him his word for example. And we do not follow them because they are his words. The problem hamsters are gonna have no right to lay down any laws.
And the prophets are seldom is not gonna happen. He's not the one who has the right to lay down but but he has been given the authority by Quran and therefore we follow Him and the same is true with all the other
sources of law. So today as I finish Allah, we're going to discuss the Quran
more respect to the many topics
that need to be discussed with respect to how to understand particular verses of the Quran.
And those have to do with the rules of language
and other principles of we'll study those things after we study this.
Because those things, how to understand the wording of the Quran and the structure of the Quran.
These those things apply both to the wording of the Quran and also to the wording of the Hadith of the prophets. Excellent. So we'll take those up after as you see on your reading list. We take those up after we discuss the decision.
as always, we should have a definition of the course.
On. So we know what we're what we're talking about. What is the definition of a quota?
Okay, remember, the key to a definition, or a good definition? Or a good idea or an acceptable definition is that it should include everything that should be included and exclude everything that should be excluded, excluded. And it would be nice if it doesn't have any extraneous material.
Useless strip repetitive material. So that's one could you say it again? Maybe louder?
In English or in English?
How's it done?
But we want the basic definition.
Something that's not okay. Here's one is one definition.
So Nope, I should write it in Arabic. Because every time I read something epic, someone always accused me of being wrong.
What I wrote, but this is a from one take that already in Arabic
or should I write it?
here first? Okay, no, no dispute about
You'll see that this definition contains some things that are left out in his
I'm sure this is people who are going to be listening to me really appreciate this moment
when I read in English
Yeah, that's a good idea. Okay. So it is the the Arabic
from the smallest
segment how to pronounce it or how to write
what was it the Arabic wording revealed?
This has reached this
Who's the who's the source of the trouble?
We have a correlation coefficient of one every time you come in the noise level.
Continuous transmission, which is the challenge.
by the smallest
By the way, everyone remember what it means
more than once
Now the reason we included these
The Arabic wording
when we say Arabic, this now negates all the other revolutions, that Allah subhana wa tada has given to any other prophets, there is nothing in the Arabic language.
When we specifically say wording
What do I What are we trying to exclude from?
Good, we could be excluding translation. What else?
Okay, not not happy. But we're by this condition, we are excluding all the statements of the public session that are not
counted because the public should know his statements are considered a revelation from Allah, but unless for what God revealed to him the meaning
and not necessarily the wording of his statements.
We don't want any extraneous material.
not going to be our final definition.
This is one definition taken from one book.
And we'll see what is what is missing from
gate. This was revealed to the public. This excludes any Arabic revelation that was revealed to any province other than the problem
which has come down through US government worker transmission, or continuous transmission.
And the challenge
for the rest of mankind to produce even the smallest of it's sort of Okay, what do we what are we excluding now by this last?
This last statement we are excluding?
Because have you put the word
revealed to the public a bit of warning, the warning was revealed to him. But it is not part of this miracle that is a challenge to mankind. What do we what are we excluding by this part here through continuous transmission or by what what?
Yeah, that's pretty obvious when you say
We're excluding and we'll get into more detail on this later we are excluding narrations of the Quran
which are not and again, as I said, we will get into a little bit more. Okay. What's the problem with this?
It has to be more or less
We're going to go into that again.
Develop which is
which is which here refers nowhere in English
which refers to the Arabic Gani of the Quran refers to the Quran.
Okay, Danny, just forget about the rest of it this thing that this thing that we're defining, which is the Quran is a challenge
by the smallest of disorders. In other words, the Quran challenges mankind to produce something similar to it. Even just one sort of even the smallest almost without a challenge of mankind to Bruce, to make sure that similar to a small surah
this one, so this is
a challenge. I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
That was easy.
Question. Danny bombs is definitely definition.
Thanks for pointing that out.
It's always the rest of you
wrote it down.
You wrote it out correctly.
Any problem with
anything missing in the definition?
I'll give you a second definition
to the same
extremes, this improvement
needs to include
repetitive Okay, here's, here's another definition
for how many definitions Would you like to go through today before we, before we come up with the one we like
of course isn't finished yet.
in the English
throughput was the transmission.
Now the same
same analysis here as the other one
of them a lot, I think this is what they mean by this here, but it's not the best way of expressing.
So, it is the word of Allah revealed to Mohammed the same kind of things that we talked about there.
That is the type of
worship by society What are we excluding here now?
We are excluding
the other hobbies we already excluded here
are not considered cunnamulla.
So far everything is pretty much the same as over there.
Except for this now.
Take a look. Who would have been
easy for you to address not here.
Now, what's the problem here with this condition, just the way it's written here.
I said, What's the problem with this with this condition? Just saying that as opposed to saying what you wrote over here, must open.
here refers to what
By the way, you
must have What does
he have the same word
Indonesian you have the same word with you
is one meaning of it is the copy of between one cover between one cover together. That is okay. But here's the first is something else.
Okay, here it is referring to the massage of man.
When was the man
in the second compilation of the Quran during the time of man, he distributed
and kept going with him in Medina
he distributed we're not all the same.
Now it's possible to get
watch or continuous transmitted narration from the Quran which is not consistent with Messiah
this is possible. So therefore that is not considered a part of the Quran. So that's why we need this extra
condition that is stated there.
we will get to them. Okay, we've talked about them
any questions about about the definition? And why we put these
why all these conditions? Are there any conditions may be missing from it
anything missing from here? So the good definition includes everything that should be included.
Okay, that's a good point.
What about this
All right. If the point of this was to exclude you could see that it is taken by this condition here that it is a form of worship and we say but this is better than that.
Good, good point.
we're talking about manner
the problem with this is that this one is better because the Quran if you take an eye out to the front
is not necessarily considered a miracle by itself
by itself taken out is still part of the Quran.
And still when you recited it's considered from worship but by itself outside of the surah is not considered necessarily challenge.
Nothing wrong with this definition, but this one is better.
What I'm saying is this is better because this one if we just take one verse out all the supplies
but this one doesn't give that idea.
Other words, it's better to exclude exclude you could see by the statement, but it's just a matter of detail. Yeah.
Not important point.
Now the next question
with respect to the
because you didn't say anything.
Okay, the next question is
here's the Quran.
Both of these are just one of these.
So tell me I haven't done it yet. Because we have to get to the meaning
of what we mean by this
How would you How would you translate episode
Okay structure in the sense of this is the way that it is given the way that it is written to give it a specific meaning.
Now words This includes also the words
This includes the words
they are not my translation
they are translating it.
So it is the way that the words and the form give it a specific meaning.
Yeah, but if he wants to say one word
and what's this one down here?
This is not the engineering definition.
But this one is
Now, the question is, is the both of these
just one of them? And if so, which one? Of course, that definition is the first one.
Okay, you're saying that the,
would just include the first one?
Why not both? MFT which is?
Okay. in general.
In general, in general, everyone says that it is both. Okay. Number one,
the meaning and structure. Now, some
hate to always take examples from Abu hanifa. But it
is related from Abu hanifa
omit the word meaning.
What do you mean?
Is the Quran and just the meaning? Or is it also meaning in the structure? Now remember, this is
this is also the class class. Okay, we should not cover anything in this class that doesn't have something to do with the practical application
of the word.
No, no, forget about that.
But he's saying that the point that what is the crime the Quran is actually the mean of the revelation? Not the words
are not the numbers.
What's the point related to this
point related to this could be something could have something to do with something. What's the point is this
can we translate it and
for example, in the salons, this means that you may recycle in any language you want.
if the bond is just
the meaning, then you may translate the meaning and you may precise
in Persian, for example.
First of all, we said that Abu hanifa never said the first point.
Secondly, his students will use it with Mohammed they disagreed with him, they said no.
Thirdly, I think he recorded his changes
change his opinion. He said later that it is both and therefore you cannot read for example, sort of Professor in person sort of
because the Quran is both
the font is just the meaning of the revelation. Then if I translate that meaning into English for example, I kept the meaning. I can say that.
For example, if I wanted to translate sources
and it's in the Quran, we know that Allah subhana wa tada orders us to recite and it wasn't easy from the Quran. This is the person
Across from the subject okay.
So, if the just the meaning and not the structure and the actual words
then I can translate the meaning into any language and restate it in the prayer and it would be considered
yes but you can take from the structure the meaning
if you take from the structures the meaning and translate them meaning have you know enough to put on or not
okay, but it seems that one time you said yes, but then he changed his mind. So, therefore, the Quran is both
the structure and the mean
meaning also from my point of view is that for example, the translation of the Quran cannot be used and you cannot use the translation of the Quran to get some points from the Quran
because as we'll talk about later, and in the Quran in Arabic language, the Arabic rules applied with what has a general meaning what doesn't have a general meaning and so forth. And in order to get the rules from the Quran, you actually have to go back to the Quran which is both the meaning and destruction
and as I said this this opinion
he's never he's never said it according to the way or he he changed his mind
so the translation of the Quran the Quran is both structure and meaning is not the Quran
and that is caught very clearly in that in that
definition when we say the Arabic word and actually this is also cut here because tullahoma this was revealed to Mohammed was the Arabic word
why was the change his mind and his leading students Mohammed Abu Musa, they never had the
money but didn't have the opinion or he changed his mind and no one else ever has.
That's why everyone says that the translation of the Quran is not the Quran.
Okay, any question about that?
Now, let's get into the topic. Brothers kind of mentioned about a little bit
I'm still going to be talking while he passes these out. So try to keep the noise down.
During the last time
the plan was revealed.
And it was one foot on obviously, but
it was revealed in different ways, right.
Okay, it was revealed seven different ways. What's the proof for that?
What was the heavy?
What is the what are the Have you?
Okay, has been revealed. The seven
is a good word.
Try to keep the noise down while he's setting these up.
Because in both English and Arabic, right, make sure he's spelling out the right.
was revealed in seven of these things.
The life of the party.
Someone was was praying.
I believe it was a photographer, I'm speaking correctly. And when he was spraying the land was reciting the Quran differently from what he had heard it from the public conversation.
So as he said he wanted to jump on him during the prayer.
But he was patient enough to wait to the end of the prayer after the end of the prayer, took this man through the problem, hundreds of them
and he said that the
Yeah, he asked me where did you get this, this wording and he said he heard it from the public
Bob Dylan, he asked me to recite what he what he recited
said, that's the way it has been revealed.
And then he has also to recite the way that you knew it.
And he restated it differently and he says it's also the way it has been revealed.
Actually, this is one of the miraculous aspects of the Quran. Usually when you study, Quran is a miracle, or agenda. They rarely discussed this.
And usually they don't discuss this as one of the miraculous tests. But in fact, it was
one of the record assessments, but now what does it mean though?
That's the question. What does it mean to say it was revealed in 777?
There was a difference between the
two the way sometimes
this is translated most
of the time.
What were the differences?
Okay, some say some say it means revealed seven diamonds
Some say means seven dialects of the phrase
No, these are the scores latest scores. Yeah, what does this mean?
It means seven dialects of the Arabic language.
But between the two problems the first one is stronger because the problem
was revealed in Qureshi language.
By the way, there's something like 41 different opinions about what the
so I'm not going to go over
Yeah, but we need just to understand so we can discuss
Okay, I'm not going to go over all all seven but for example, sometimes a word
is substituted with another word with the same meaning or a synonym
sometimes there are grammatical changes and the reason
sometimes is morphological changes in the mean, and the resetting and
sometimes there's grammatical changes
sometimes there's morphological changes
sometimes the both
sometimes the word is replaced with a word a different word with a different mean medicine
sometimes the the the order of the of the verses
one word will proceed another word so far,
because this was the possibility
if I remember correctly, okay.
morphological How do you translate morphological to every
grammatically grammatical, this changes the shape or the look of the word
not because we
change any words and this will be changed in between.
shape of the word.
shape of the word Leave it, leave it to that, okay.
We'll get to some examples. But the point the point is that during the lifetime of the problem
the problem was revealed and seven, Moser after any question
changes the shape of the word.
shape. Look, changes the look no no.
Changes. Okay, how would How was the poem written at that time?
without the skill
This changes the look of the word.
Yeah, but changes even the word, the letter based on
Okay, okay, fine. The point is that all of these, all of these seven ways of reading the Quran, okay? They're all considered the Quran.
Okay, so if any of these seven come down to us, even though sometimes they have different meanings all of them are approved in Islamic law.
Any of the seven that we get nowadays are approved in Islamic law.
now what's happened during the time of month?
What did man do?
Okay, that's that's another question. We'll get to that in a second.
Okay, during this time, during this time with the problem
How is the Koran preserved?
Okay, it was preserved through both memory and writing. Right? But the important thing to remember especially about the Quran is that you do not hit the Quran through writing
you cannot get the Quran for writing you have to get it verbally from someone who knows
because the way it was written at that time,
what's a good word to give an
over here for example,
it was written without the shield above points
right? Everyone knows about points that is written without development.
But it was also written without these
was also written without this
was this could be swords for example.
Now that there's no doubt many different ways to be able to read them.
And this was original way right?
Yes, they put different pointers as I said, this can be read in different ways. So the only way to get to chronic not providing okay, but it was through
all learning from the ones who learned back to the problem.
That's the first point.
as to what was recorded for example, in this way during the lifetime of the Bahamas. During this time what happened
boo collected from the data from a number of people who had memorized the Quran
and specifically one battle so I'm going to add the idea to collect the Quran
since this was not this was this was something I've done during the time of the problem I
had first of all kind of help some hesitation
and then all of a dialogue guided him to let go for on end when it was collected and written it was written in this manner
and it was kept work.
Now one of the most important parts in person for the people who collected the currency but it was kept in the house
Okay, now during the time of mine now what's happened
learn a lot about
Okay, the problem was during the time is
the time of man
and Islam spread many people many of them who do not know the Arabic language that well and also many people who do not take the Quran from those people who know it those
people who are reciting the Quran are not reciting it correct.
I remember to do was cut in half and
have no problem with the product before he interrupted.
Okay, so there was no
The people who are or who are reciting it incorrectly.
Question or something to do with the camera?
We never know what when it's from your whether it's the question or something to do with the camera?
No, apparently not. I mean, I cannot say no, for sure. But apparently, if you read what was said at that time, that argument wasn't brought up.
Okay. So, so what?
He brought it again, and he brought
up wherever it happens to be.
And he made
He rewrote it.
Basically, he rewrote it. Now, there's some evidence to show.
Thank you. Now, there's some evidence to show that these dots that I raised,
at the time of
the harvest did not or did not
include it in His
Word on purpose or not, we cannot say but he did not include it in Islam.
Now, this means
the question that some people ask is, do these still exist after the
episode apparently agrees with
that what happened was that of my two toes, one of these seven,
shows one of these seven, and that became the law.
And he distributed these seven corrupt Muslim men.
That's one view. The
second mode was to make the reading easier, as the mercy for the woman is not something where you put
and then after the time of life, they are no longer there.
And it comments on it.
was executive, okay. And when he when he wrote these, the seven were different.
Seven were different. And in fact, when the revolution against perfmon was,
people came from Egypt.
And they said to me, why did you make the drawn to one when it was revealed more than one? And his answer to that was, and you may read them in any way that you wish, in other words, you may read them in any of the seven. And there was what he wrote what he compiled was compatible with. So it seems that the 70 it did not die
or they are included in the different
So now, because of this now,
because of these differences, not that not differences that have been created, but because of this original from the dam of the province of Salem.
Because of this, now we have different ways of reading the Quran. And we call these ways what we call them.
The differences and the fact that Othman preserved them led to what we now call the difference.
Some of these readings are good.
Some of them are not.
Now the question arises,
for sure, all seven of these, any seven of these are from the Quran is a part of the Quran. No question about the seven during the time.
But the cause that came afterwards now, were many.
The question is now which one of these
which one of these crops are to be considered the Quran or to be considered part of the Quran?
Basically, there's three conditions.
There's three conditions for any reading to be considered part of the process.
What are those three?
What do you mean?
The most specific
Okay, first of all it has to come down to us
if it is not if it does not come down to Prometheus the transmission is not considered for us
of man distributed
is not consistent with those
then it is not considered
now remember consistent with with Mr. Hoffman, they didn't have the dots and they didn't have the points.
So what's the third condition?
has to be correct. grammatically with Arabic language
has to be grammatically correct.
Now in my opinion,
that was waste want to give to my opinion?
My opinion this third condition is superlative or less
extreme. Why do I say that?
Why would I make this claim?
No, you can make it consistent with with the with the most often just put valid points wherever you want.
The valid points may be wrong. Eric light.
Come on in here. If it's incorrect, grammatically, most likely, it's not going to be.
Now the next question is what are these different products? And if you look at your handout, how did he How did he pay for them?
Are you missing the handle?
Okay, how many calls? Or how many readings Do we have nowadays that are more or
How many readings do we have? collected?
Seven How many? 677? Yes.
You say seven?
Okay, what's another?
Less? less than seven?
less than seven?
Okay, any other? Must have? 10? How many big 10?
Do you have anything more than 10?
Yeah, we're just talking about
what's it for sure. For sure. No question about them is going to be 1010 those are the 10 that I have written for you. And just
give the name of the of the query who does know for fans many
expectation and traces it back to the problem.
The first one by the way, is an ominous
Have you often
I have a question for you.
How come it's known that seven are much worse?
How come? They're actually 10 better, really much worse. But if you ask most people
like you, for example.
Okay, these seven recitals have nothing to do with this game
because of this back.
I don't know.
Okay. Any new seven readings are not the same as
They are due to the fact that the seven have but they are not the same
person who cannot and will not
Okay, the differences? That's a good question, but remind me to get back to that. Sometimes it's just a matter of reading.
Like, for example, I
went to a went to assimilate one stone with another town, they just disagree quite often on both.
So that's just a matter of reading has nothing to do with the with the meaning much of the difference between the difference
is simply related to research, not related to me
some of the differences between them has to do with the PowerPoint. As you know, if you change about points, you're changing the grammatical structure of the sentence.
So you might find the same, the same word. It has different vowel points in different readings.
But they have different points in different readings, that means the meaning is going to be different.
And from the point of view, though, of what we're talking about earlier, both of them are equally proves.
To us it's not the case that they're contradictory. In fact, they're not contradictory, but they give different meanings. not contradictory, but definitely, and both meanings are correct to be applied.
are supplementary to
say they are not positive.
But sometimes also the difference in reading is that sometimes there's a difference in the word use.
Rarely, sometimes a different word has the same meaning as the other one, sometimes a different word has a different meaning.
topic for tomorrow's lecture I will talk about.
now let's get back to the point is that if at least these three conditions, all of them are considered one of them.
Okay. Now the reason that they're seven?
Is the same reason for example, in,
why do we always refer to the six books?
How did this come up?
You've all heard the reference to six books, right?
A Muslim? And the sooner that goes credibility and the say and given measure, or what have you?
How did this develop? Do you have any idea? Because it's not because those six books are all authentic.
But it's because of a scholar in the eighth century by the name of McCarthy. He collected together the narrator's of all these books, and he puts all the narratives into one book
and discuss all those areas.
This book became so respected, so unknown, that everyone referred to those six books
should never be said.
Because these are not all authentic.
Especially not even measures. That's why some people take out even measure and they put the most of America for example, in
It takes the six books. six books are the five I mentioned, are the fifth dimension excluding every measure, and he put most of the moment
the six books in fact has no real significance.
Similar thing happened here.
An author wrote a book about the different readings
and included seven of them
heaven which I had collected together.
Why did he collect seven?
I myself have no idea why he chose seven
that he chose seven.
Yeah, but different.
They're close enough.
So after this time, many people then begin to write commentaries on his book in a bridges book. They became known as the seven
after because of his books,
if you want to
Find the seven causes vary, because of his books and the books that came after he wants to find the 10. For us, it takes more effort.
Okay, so laziness is one of the reasons that people now just rely on the seven. But in fact, all 10
Yeah, because now if you want to if you want to teach, for example, because there's many books now that have the seven, and how they differ, yeah, but if you want to find out then you have to do some research.
One of the things that
one, one verse, one word might precede the other word
possible to have two versions
of the same first order of
words in the same first one might be before the other.
Yang, in other words, not the theory, who received the revelation. And he called the person that this is the revelation that came seven different ways. But one time he received in one way or another time received in another way, and he thought
he thought those seven.
Yes, because one time he received it this way, he told us read through it that way, write it that way. Give it time, he received it this way, different way. And he told the scribe to read it that way. So during the time, all of those
days as opposed to a month, they pretty much chose one way he didn't include everyone.
Okay, any questions? No. The point is that any pen, any of these pens is considered considered fraud, and it's considered
Three are not well known.
From the time of the compiler,
you can still find reference to them in some variables.
Now remember, of course, we're not talking about completely different Quran.
Okay, we're not talking about you know, we're talking about different ways of reading. We're talking about slight differences. We're not talking about major differences.
If you ever read, if you ever, if you ever prayed to me, ma'am, from North Africa, for example,
you'll notice some slight differences in the way they read. For those of you who from prison facilities.
So any but those differences, you'll notice that they're not much because they are following a different crowd. And then the people concern not all of them, especially those who have been here a long time.
But now the question right.
Suppose we have a crop,
suppose we have a way of reading, which has an authentic chain, the authentic chain back to the problem comes back to us.
Which is not.
But it is consistent with Eric.
And it may or may not be consistent with the mustache.
We have a way of reading the front.
I don't believe in hypothetical questions.
As I said, everything else should be related to certain practices
has affected change.
That's one of the topics. But the change is not the
other words, maybe just one or two people notice.
It is consistent with Arabic And it might be consistent with Kaufmann.
is how should we deal with
it First of all, these are called
it's not a good
it's not a good transition.
what we mean
what we mean by that is that it doesn't meet the condition.
Now there are some other ways of reading which do not have authentic men. Those are rejected we're not talking about those
we're not talking about those we're talking about those
because those are not confirmed with this diploma this is a problem because it has in
fact one of the Sahaba
Now, obviously, is this wrong should we consider this Quran
be engineering school also considered aggressiveness and in all of the definitions and all of the definitions we gave for all of them we get to
we said with writing okay.
So, this is not this is not we do not consider Koran.
now, the next question is not put on
displays don't remember that the glossary
the glossary at the beginning of the reading pack that if I happen to mention any word you might be able to find it.
Now, the question is, is it are these reading books and Islamic law
and Islamic law
Okay, the different are
the different but this point
now, we can see how many people are really from there or not.
Some people say they should be considered for proofs and some they say
what is the argument of those who say they should not be considered
Okay, their argument is
not part of the plan
What might it be
okay, those of you
okay, how many
should not be approved?
these readings these readings that are not meant to us in
case should they be considered or not, who said they should not be and what's your argument
as too much detail
happy how the point is is the those people who say it does not
a thing it is part of the Quran, it is the duty of the alum to tell it to to convey it to as many people as possible. In other words, there should be more to it.
And there are things that perhaps the hava does not have you heard from the system, what the process was simply explaining the meaning of the verse
Okay, by reading a different way or by putting in a word that doesn't exist. So, in that case, though, it should be considered a type of report okay. Should
should be considered any report covered
or solid 34.
Now, the arguments of those who,
who considered to hookah, they say that the hobby would not have read it as part of the Quran unless you heard it from the problem.
It's another take some examples. The other cheek that was passed out
are four verses of the Quran
were talking about whether these should be considered hooked or not what the differences, what's the opinion of the differences.
Again, these were typed up quickly.
So then in the States, please point them up.
So for example, in the first verse here, sort of maida, verse 89, those of you who are watching on TV can push the pause button now and go get your own copies across
America, verse 18, and basically, it's talking about the one who breaks his oath.
Okay, in the bronzes, certain roles for the Kratos education of the one who breaks his own,
which says that he must be the needy people with average of what your needs are clothed them or liberate a slave. And if he doesn't find the ability to do so, then he must pass
Now, according to the the reading,
is in the third, it is three consecutive days, that is the way the muscles read the Quran. And he puts this word consecutive into his reading of the Quran.
And it is part of the Treaty of Iran.
And it's not consistent with
us. So, therefore, we considered settling.
The question is should it be considered approved or not?
Those who say that it is not approved,
which is basically the
Sharpie madhhab and one one narration from him
and some people criticize me
including my methods opinion. So, I would have included
from now on one narration from your administrators should not is not.
So according to them, if you break your oath, you do not have to pass three consecutive days. In other words, the first three days, if you can do the other things, but they do not have to beat
the hell out of you.
another narration from
follow this little wire or follow this, or this reading, and they say that it has to be consistent.
And their argument is again, even though it is not part of the front is the report and the promo kochava. And especially if you consider for example, the payments of the Sahaba is one of the
major sources of
this means either the public has
heard it from the Prophet, or it says the Sahaba is on the head. And in both cases, the head of
the chef is if it is the harvest is the head.
They don't say. So therefore they reject
her saying you cannot prove it from the bottom.
Okay, so this is a reading of Elon Musk. And there's a difference of opinion whether the
fasting has to be consecutive days or not. And that difference of opinion is because of this crowd reading
in the second,
the second verse here,
set up in verse 233.
We have a similar situation.
This is also the ability
and for whatever reason
the chorus is probably the the most different crop that we have.
And he differed with the other Sahaba and a number of number of points.
I don't think that might be one of the reasons but I don't think
it could be but I don't think
so remember that when we talk about the Quran again.
And why it was chosen to
Why did was chosen to to compile the Quran during the temple of buckler is because the Quran went through some changes.
And it was Jade who listened to the poem mssm recite the Quran back to the Braille during the month of Ramadan in the last year of the prophets life. So in other words, it was vague who was who was proficient in the final version of the Quran.
Okay, now in the second example, the same the same kind of thing occurs the reading from a building wizard
And basically it's talking about who who has the obligation to spend
upon the children
according to urban urban massage, because any basically any close relatives has the obligation to spend
even even if that close relative for example as a female or male or young or old, that person's wealth is to be spent on the children
while the others do not accepted additional words there, by the way, in English, the additional words are the ones in brackets.
Also, whenever additional words are the ones in brackets
Now, the third the third case is a little bit more interesting.
which one, the second one, the third one, the third one now is talking about if you miss days of fasting during the month of Ramadan.
Suppose you miss seven days for traveling or for illness or whatever.
After when you want to make up those gigs.
Do you have to make it up consecutively or they don't have to be consecutive.
Okay, I think most most everyone that I know. They say that it doesn't have to be consecutive.