Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 5

share this pageShare Page
Jamal Zarabozo

Channel: Jamal Zarabozo

Series:

Episode Notes

Episode Transcript

© No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever. Transcripts are auto-generated and thus will be be inaccurate. We are working on a system to allow volunteers to edit transcripts in a controlled system.


00:00:01--> 00:00:05

Anyways, the final takeaways I can give that to

00:00:09--> 00:00:11

you personally

00:00:15--> 00:00:19

just think logically but I'm sure if you think logically alone we come up with for

00:00:20--> 00:00:22

the other boy you cannot think

00:00:47--> 00:00:50

okay now now we're talking about by the way

00:00:53--> 00:00:53

formal methods

00:00:56--> 00:00:57

the

00:00:58--> 00:01:00

use to differentiate between

00:01:09--> 00:01:13

This is not the time that you do not take it from

00:01:14--> 00:01:15

me this is like for example

00:01:17--> 00:01:18

you might mention a heavy or

00:01:20--> 00:01:22

someone might come to him and ask a question

00:01:30--> 00:01:36

if you if you if you will take this headache from him at that time you have to mention it. And it was something that

00:01:38--> 00:01:40

he used to have formal ways of passing on

00:01:41--> 00:01:46

formal sessions in which they used to pass on so this is kind of

00:01:47--> 00:01:51

like what you mentioned evergreen would not be considered a form of way of

00:01:55--> 00:01:57

well I'll give you the first one then next year

00:01:59--> 00:02:04

you can figure out what the next one is for the ship or the

00:02:06--> 00:02:09

score added to to read to the students

00:02:12--> 00:02:15

chat with attending a call that

00:02:22--> 00:02:22

did people

00:02:28--> 00:02:28

you been reading

00:02:31--> 00:02:36

any of the students here I'll make it even easier the students here's the heavy from the

00:02:38--> 00:02:38

get

00:02:40--> 00:02:40

go

00:02:46--> 00:02:48

will discuss more in more detail

00:02:49--> 00:02:51

because I want to see how much you can get logically

00:02:53--> 00:02:54

the only one you can Good luck

00:02:56--> 00:02:56

to

00:02:57--> 00:02:58

have any

00:03:01--> 00:03:02

writing is

00:03:08--> 00:03:09

pretty hot and we've been

00:03:11--> 00:03:12

doing it

00:03:18--> 00:03:20

not quite that that's not quite healthy. Is

00:03:31--> 00:03:35

that a formal way of putting it like if you're right handed to someone?

00:03:38--> 00:03:40

Just want to see how many have come up with what

00:03:42--> 00:03:43

the no one has written.

00:03:47--> 00:03:49

from student to teacher like what

00:03:55--> 00:03:59

this is the students read the teachers heading back to the teacher

00:04:04--> 00:04:05

what would you call it?

00:04:10--> 00:04:11

also has another name.

00:04:24--> 00:04:25

Everybody

00:04:27--> 00:04:29

is one of the students.

00:04:32--> 00:04:33

I

00:04:37--> 00:04:38

just don't see how many

00:04:40--> 00:04:41

they are reading from a book.

00:04:50--> 00:04:52

One of them is not acceptable at all.

00:04:57--> 00:04:58

Any other agenda

00:05:00--> 00:05:00

Good,

00:05:03--> 00:05:03

Jim

00:05:09--> 00:05:09

is fine.

00:05:11--> 00:05:12

Fine.

00:05:32--> 00:05:33

What's up this right now?

00:05:35--> 00:05:39

Each one of them. By the way, we put on the board which one you think

00:05:40--> 00:05:41

is the strong?

00:05:47--> 00:05:48

everyone agree with that

00:05:55--> 00:05:55

song

00:06:07--> 00:06:08

somebody said

00:06:09--> 00:06:10

you're missing

00:06:12--> 00:06:15

some more more details

00:06:20--> 00:06:21

of Islam.

00:06:23--> 00:06:26

And the early years of December's was the most common.

00:06:32--> 00:06:36

Whereas the set used to read that either he was really heavy from his memory,

00:06:37--> 00:06:39

or he would read it from his books.

00:06:41--> 00:06:42

He has books that he read

00:06:44--> 00:06:45

to the students.

00:06:48--> 00:06:49

Now

00:06:52--> 00:06:54

we're going to get to something,

00:06:55--> 00:06:58

we're going to get to a couple which were very uncommon in early years, but

00:07:02--> 00:07:07

they were not narrowed like 15 to 20, usually, maybe three or four hours a night.

00:07:14--> 00:07:15

And the student takes it and learns it.

00:07:18--> 00:07:21

If I give you 30 headings right now, unless you'd like to

00:07:25--> 00:07:27

put, I'm talking about now with the early years

00:07:29--> 00:07:30

and also in the

00:07:32--> 00:07:35

sometimes the shed would read it

00:07:36--> 00:07:37

from the students books,

00:07:39--> 00:07:39

also, okay.

00:07:42--> 00:07:43

And he recorded it.

00:07:44--> 00:07:47

And the next day he comes and he reads his head from your book.

00:07:51--> 00:07:54

Now this is this led to a very good way of testing the

00:07:55--> 00:07:56

the ship

00:07:57--> 00:08:00

How could you test the ship? What would you do?

00:08:04--> 00:08:10

Exactly what he said, he said something different, you're gonna notice it and you said, This isn't on they didn't say that. So

00:08:13--> 00:08:16

what they used to do was put at ease when sizes were not too heavy.

00:08:18--> 00:08:21

So, we just read those headings without saying anything you know, any

00:08:24--> 00:08:26

kind of distinguishes it from other headings.

00:08:35--> 00:08:36

When you when you

00:08:39--> 00:08:41

when you read there are

00:08:42--> 00:08:43

each type of

00:08:44--> 00:08:48

each matter each way of getting paid leads to certain way of when you commit to

00:08:50--> 00:08:51

a certain way.

00:08:54--> 00:08:58

In other words, if I heard the heavy through seminar I heard

00:08:59--> 00:09:00

then when I narrated like

00:09:01--> 00:09:06

I should use a certain form of certain words, that tells everybody I heard is gruesome.

00:09:08--> 00:09:08

Or in general

00:09:11--> 00:09:15

there's a few terms that you could use the most obvious thing

00:09:19--> 00:09:20

most obvious the summit

00:09:22--> 00:09:26

summit, though can only be used in the case of summer semester meeting hackers.

00:09:31--> 00:09:32

What else may you

00:09:33--> 00:09:35

definitely use has enough words.

00:09:43--> 00:09:44

Yes, you may be

00:09:49--> 00:09:49

reading.

00:09:50--> 00:09:52

He said that in the previous lecture that

00:09:55--> 00:09:55

actually read the

00:09:57--> 00:09:57

book

00:09:59--> 00:09:59

or the ship

00:10:00--> 00:10:00

read some books.

00:10:04--> 00:10:06

I read my book to you,

00:10:07--> 00:10:08

then you can

00:10:17--> 00:10:17

directly

00:10:19--> 00:10:19

read

00:10:24--> 00:10:25

key linguistically only when

00:10:28--> 00:10:30

you say somebody said something doesn't answer that you heard it

00:10:32--> 00:10:33

correctly.

00:10:35--> 00:10:38

If you never know, Hey, can I say all of

00:10:42--> 00:10:43

you

00:10:45--> 00:10:47

permissible to use the Prophet

00:10:53--> 00:10:53

Mohammed?

00:11:06--> 00:11:09

Okay, I heard it from

00:11:11--> 00:11:14

you read that to me. Can I say column?

00:11:15--> 00:11:19

I can't see it right. But this is not proper to see.

00:11:20--> 00:11:21

Why is it not property?

00:11:25--> 00:11:26

What's the whole point of this?

00:11:30--> 00:11:32

What is the purpose is because

00:11:33--> 00:11:34

when the second

00:11:36--> 00:11:38

one just physically conveyed

00:11:42--> 00:11:46

there's a headache. Okay, I heard this from Mohammed,

00:12:04--> 00:12:04

the English

00:12:06--> 00:12:06

game.

00:12:10--> 00:12:13

linguistics according to the language, if I heard any form

00:12:14--> 00:12:15

of unethical

00:12:16--> 00:12:17

there's nothing wrong.

00:12:18--> 00:12:25

But the police would say yes, there's something wrong. Because this can be used for somebody is hiding.

00:12:27--> 00:12:35

Exactly. Because when you say Paula, you're not giving enough information about how your birthday. So if you heard us throw some out, you should not just say

00:12:49--> 00:12:54

in other words, I could have heard it from from hundreds or something. Yes.

00:12:55--> 00:12:57

For most of us went all the way around the room.

00:12:58--> 00:12:58

So when I said

00:13:00--> 00:13:03

there's no way to know how I got either I heard it directly I didn't hear

00:13:05--> 00:13:07

so they want to be more specific.

00:13:10--> 00:13:10

You

00:13:14--> 00:13:20

heard it from him if you if you if you did not hear through some and then your letter.

00:13:24--> 00:13:25

Also, what else?

00:13:33--> 00:13:33

What else?

00:13:37--> 00:13:38

Brisbane

00:14:02--> 00:14:04

assumed is a chain and

00:14:06--> 00:14:08

you might have a chain. That

00:14:10--> 00:14:12

means that you might have

00:14:14--> 00:14:14

the middle.

00:14:15--> 00:14:17

But it's a mess. Mohammed.

00:14:21--> 00:14:28

Mohammed, this means I heard it directly from Mohammed and I heard it through some app. He read it to us in Arabic because

00:14:31--> 00:14:31

what do you think?

00:14:34--> 00:14:34

But

00:14:36--> 00:14:36

not

00:14:39--> 00:14:41

specified? usages?

00:14:43--> 00:14:44

Usually in every semester, Mohammed

00:14:46--> 00:14:47

must have heard from him.

00:14:48--> 00:14:57

He's confused. So the same will happen. Same with that button. Okay, there's another term that may be used. It was it was that's the other term.

00:15:00--> 00:15:04

was born with a sermon was used in an earlier generation

00:15:07--> 00:15:09

before the Tamil heritage was finalized.

00:15:11--> 00:15:12

What's the problem with this one?

00:15:18--> 00:15:19

It doesn't say how we

00:15:20--> 00:15:24

protect nowadays, there's still people who write, and they write books like they take them

00:15:30--> 00:15:33

over. So it is not preferred to use this person.

00:15:38--> 00:15:41

Some of the some of the LMR.

00:15:46--> 00:15:47

There's also you can also see

00:15:48--> 00:15:49

the difference now,

00:15:51--> 00:15:54

although it's not there, but you may say,

00:15:58--> 00:15:59

this is okay.

00:16:01--> 00:16:02

because it implies

00:16:17--> 00:16:22

I was the one who blamed the way that headache is transmitted, although he said

00:16:23--> 00:16:25

that first one is the one who's blind.

00:16:28--> 00:16:33

And then also kind of it also might imply that directly here

00:16:36--> 00:16:40

all of these, for example, if you say semester, Mohammed, many times

00:16:41--> 00:16:42

I heard Mohammed say,

00:16:44--> 00:16:46

it's not the same thing as same column

00:16:47--> 00:16:49

as the way of receiving the transmission.

00:16:52--> 00:16:52

The world

00:16:54--> 00:16:55

has stopped someone

00:17:00--> 00:17:03

from no notice continuing to know.

00:17:09--> 00:17:09

He

00:17:10--> 00:17:14

has some headaches and also medically out of the Father.

00:17:21--> 00:17:23

Especially folks that still continuing with books,

00:17:24--> 00:17:25

especially

00:17:27--> 00:17:34

some scholars have already differentiated bought enough something just enough for some are but you may not use a button

00:17:36--> 00:17:38

they go into some great detail.

00:17:46--> 00:17:47

Next,

00:17:48--> 00:17:52

is considered the strongest way of government headed by most of the

00:17:58--> 00:18:00

next come up

00:18:04--> 00:18:04

have an English

00:18:18--> 00:18:20

as an English comes from.

00:18:28--> 00:18:28

Anyway,

00:18:38--> 00:18:41

this one begin, not begin at the

00:18:43--> 00:18:44

beginning of the second century

00:18:46--> 00:18:49

is this one who was was when this one was most popular.

00:18:50--> 00:18:55

But it also existed before, before that one of the domain

00:18:56--> 00:18:57

name is the machine.

00:18:58--> 00:19:07

He said I used to record the head even over data. And then after I recorded them, I used to go back to him and read them to him to make sure they're correct.

00:19:09--> 00:19:09

By the way,

00:19:13--> 00:19:17

example and also some apps that I use to record the headaches

00:19:20--> 00:19:22

and then after he takes the headache, he goes back

00:19:23--> 00:19:28

and checks to make sure that they are correct. So it did exist before but

00:19:29--> 00:19:33

and it became most popular around the beginning of the second century 100 years

00:19:34--> 00:19:34

after

00:19:36--> 00:19:37

and this is what again,

00:19:43--> 00:19:46

what is this process described? What is it

00:19:48--> 00:19:50

now I mean, what is it exactly what is happening

00:19:55--> 00:19:57

in the future reads to the student right this one

00:19:59--> 00:20:00

student three

00:20:00--> 00:20:03

Back to the teacher. And usually what they used to do

00:20:04--> 00:20:11

is the teacher gives the students his book and he reads them back to the teacher. And also now there's another way to test the teacher.

00:20:16--> 00:20:19

Exactly. Okay. Another way of

00:20:20--> 00:20:22

you retire habits which are not in this book,

00:20:23--> 00:20:25

yet, if he doesn't notice them, what does that mean?

00:20:26--> 00:20:26

It

00:20:27--> 00:20:31

means any better getting old.

00:20:32--> 00:20:34

What do you do also, by the way, you have the,

00:20:36--> 00:20:37

after the Chinese, they put a server.

00:20:39--> 00:20:42

Every time you read the headings to the ship, you put a line through the circle.

00:20:44--> 00:20:48

So we found many manuscripts having many, many lines.

00:20:49--> 00:20:52

Circle, meaning there is many, many senses.

00:20:55--> 00:20:57

always the case too much.

00:21:03--> 00:21:07

By the way, with respect to some at one point, I forgot to mention,

00:21:08--> 00:21:09

I think it'll come up later

00:21:11--> 00:21:16

about if someone has never any idea, is it permissible to record his heaviest wealth.

00:21:20--> 00:21:23

And should we accept the idea that someone who records while listening to him

00:21:27--> 00:21:28

because there is a chance that he has something

00:21:31--> 00:21:32

he wasn't polite enough

00:21:34--> 00:21:36

to see any of the details.

00:21:37--> 00:21:43

And it went to defend it, the shaft is really heavy from the person who's writing it means what

00:21:45--> 00:21:47

was hopefully listening someone.

00:21:48--> 00:21:51

And he was completely concentrating on listening.

00:21:53--> 00:21:59

So there was a debate whether or not we should accept the heavy for those people who record while listening to him.

00:22:00--> 00:22:02

So it's not that I'm missing something.

00:22:05--> 00:22:16

What they used to do usually is was the ship is reading the head if they have one student to write a little bit fast. And he writes for everybody. And they want to make sure he doesn't make him.

00:22:17--> 00:22:23

And then after the session is over, they borrow the coffee, and they recorded themselves.

00:22:24--> 00:22:28

So the point was that they tried to do their best to concentrate on what the

00:22:30--> 00:22:30

one thing

00:22:32--> 00:22:32

was.

00:22:34--> 00:22:39

That for example, if I'm the ship, I'm reading headings, from my book, you'll be reading

00:22:41--> 00:22:44

this will make sure you're not making any mistakes. The rest will just be listening.

00:22:46--> 00:22:48

That after the session, they'll take your copy and copy

00:22:53--> 00:22:55

it to the people who are looking for.

00:22:59--> 00:23:02

But the shift has been very slow matter.

00:23:07--> 00:23:11

Earlier, let me use the word radical.

00:23:13--> 00:23:13

I'm wondering,

00:23:15--> 00:23:16

is there a risk to lose?

00:23:17--> 00:23:20

Because of these count very strict criteria?

00:23:23--> 00:23:24

I mean,

00:23:26--> 00:23:29

theoretically, there might be, but as we talked about before, I

00:23:30--> 00:23:34

promise to preserve the signal. So we know that the jello

00:23:40--> 00:23:43

pretty much because the baby

00:23:55--> 00:23:56

and the lady later on

00:24:05--> 00:24:06

as the recording

00:24:16--> 00:24:18

know some what it was complicated.

00:24:26--> 00:24:34

For example, if we do all these things, and I'm the chef, and I give me two or three that we can edit and say we're still doing all these things.

00:24:35--> 00:24:36

But it's still possible.

00:24:37--> 00:24:38

But anyway, we'll discuss

00:24:40--> 00:24:40

much, much

00:24:46--> 00:24:47

more restrictions in

00:24:49--> 00:24:50

many ways to make sure

00:24:53--> 00:24:54

yeah.

00:24:55--> 00:24:57

You said that movie those good

00:25:00--> 00:25:03

Post is not only one way. So we can use this

00:25:05--> 00:25:07

many ways to make sure that

00:25:11--> 00:25:12

they may not

00:25:15--> 00:25:15

watch.

00:25:19--> 00:25:19

I can watch.

00:25:21--> 00:25:22

But there is

00:25:23--> 00:25:36

one exception to this with respect to many of the habits, that one day when they were about to die, they were afraid that they were they were not passing on the knowledge that they had before they died, many of them used to marry more any

00:25:37--> 00:25:39

sure that the knowledge that they have

00:25:47--> 00:25:48

between these things?

00:25:58--> 00:26:05

Some people say whether 334?

00:26:10--> 00:26:11

Or

00:26:14--> 00:26:17

like, why would someone say this is stronger than it?

00:26:23--> 00:26:24

Could be good?

00:26:28--> 00:26:28

Yeah.

00:26:30--> 00:26:32

They couldn't from the teacher and the

00:26:37--> 00:26:38

teacher.

00:26:39--> 00:26:45

So what does it mean the student is reading to the ship, while the students is reading to the ship, the ship.

00:26:46--> 00:26:47

Mine

00:26:49--> 00:26:55

concentrate on that doesn't have to worry about reading more about anything, you can just concentrate on that.

00:27:03--> 00:27:06

area. So the students is right there does not from A

00:27:07--> 00:27:08

to B, this

00:27:14--> 00:27:19

is this one is longer, or this one where the majority opinion is strong.

00:27:21--> 00:27:23

Now, if you're here heading this way,

00:27:26--> 00:27:27

how could you say when you're

00:27:31--> 00:27:31

let's say like

00:27:39--> 00:27:40

this,

00:27:41--> 00:27:49

and the rest of us are in the class. So India is reading headed to adolescence. But obviously it has read the heading to adolescence.

00:27:50--> 00:27:53

And he said after head it was me.

00:27:58--> 00:28:05

So yes, is reading happy to oblige. We're all in the class. Now I want to narrate

00:28:20--> 00:28:21

last semester was out.

00:28:24--> 00:28:25

How would you say

00:28:42--> 00:28:48

so in other words, can you say out loud enough? what you meant mentioned daddy as was raised with him.

00:28:50--> 00:28:51

You don't just accept the norm.

00:28:55--> 00:28:56

But was the word but it

00:29:11--> 00:29:11

doesn't have to.

00:29:18--> 00:29:19

You don't mention the one who's read.

00:29:28--> 00:29:32

But So the important thing is when you're narrating or whenever

00:29:34--> 00:29:34

you should admit

00:29:38--> 00:29:40

this is called send love.

00:29:44--> 00:29:46

That's also when the rest of by the way.

00:29:47--> 00:29:52

What do you heard is the rock again, he will be alive, all of his head it will be rejected.

00:29:53--> 00:29:53

But

00:29:55--> 00:29:59

now just to make some final points about these two in particular, isn't this

00:30:00--> 00:30:00

two most important

00:30:04--> 00:30:11

number one, regardless of which way is being done, where there's any broken or

00:30:15--> 00:30:15

broken?

00:30:17--> 00:30:20

Can you hear me through some out throw gras or

00:30:27--> 00:30:29

broken? broke me that has no money?

00:30:33--> 00:30:36

Did I hear directly from the other link?

00:30:41--> 00:30:49

Okay, so the first thing, the important thing is that these two are both unbroke. Are they any the chain is unbroken if these are and the

00:30:55--> 00:30:55

next one is

00:31:00--> 00:31:06

i'm saying is that if you hear if you see a headache, and it says colon, and then it says the medical plan.

00:31:09--> 00:31:13

My question is, if you look at that part of the chain, with the broken arm broke,

00:31:15--> 00:31:18

and broken because the person heard it directly from that

00:31:19--> 00:31:20

was the same of if that had

00:31:27--> 00:31:27

been

00:31:28--> 00:31:29

the question who

00:31:30--> 00:31:32

didn't you say? Two tags

00:31:35--> 00:31:41

is reading from this book. Students reading from chases book, or Chase is reading from a student's book.

00:31:42--> 00:31:48

Either either the student is reading from the book, or the students is reading it from his own

00:31:52--> 00:31:54

case it has to be read to the ship.

00:31:55--> 00:31:56

Okay, the second one

00:31:57--> 00:32:02

is in it's stronger than semantic because it's by definition plus an actress for

00:32:03--> 00:32:10

your book as a student. Well, then what you're saying is that his arguments are not together stronger than the math.

00:32:11--> 00:32:14

Yeah, I mean, not to distinguish the second kind of

00:32:17--> 00:32:17

book,

00:32:18--> 00:32:22

you're, you're assuming that his book was read to the shift, we're taking

00:32:24--> 00:32:28

my book of your heavy and I may have copies for him. Now I'm reading it to

00:32:30--> 00:32:31

myself I never had

00:32:46--> 00:32:46

was

00:32:48--> 00:32:56

important. It began to be very popular around the beginning of the why, why? Why? Why was it a mess of us? Yeah. Because

00:33:00--> 00:33:02

I mean, you have meaning in order to

00:33:03--> 00:33:04

check.

00:33:06--> 00:33:11

I want to read some headings. You say, Okay, here's my book. Take it read it to me.

00:33:12--> 00:33:17

So you have a book, okay. You gave me your book of headings. I never heard these headings from you before.

00:33:21--> 00:33:22

Didn't place in that

00:33:29--> 00:33:30

respect.

00:33:34--> 00:33:36

There's many questions that the

00:33:37--> 00:33:38

scholars have. It used to

00:33:39--> 00:33:44

ask and especially with respect to these, sometimes the gathering would be quite large.

00:33:46--> 00:33:48

Obviously, this was before the microphone.

00:33:49--> 00:33:53

When the gathering was quite large, how did they get the people in the back to here with the ship?

00:33:59--> 00:33:59

What are they called?

00:34:31--> 00:34:32

asked to do?

00:34:35--> 00:34:35

That

00:34:38--> 00:34:38

someone who

00:34:39--> 00:34:40

probably

00:34:42--> 00:34:42

is in it

00:34:46--> 00:34:51

because he was asked to start making less and

00:34:53--> 00:34:58

here's the question and then go back to our short Yeah.

00:35:01--> 00:35:02

The cameraman though

00:35:04--> 00:35:07

the white men, I guess, you know, yes.

00:35:08--> 00:35:09

I said

00:35:11--> 00:35:12

I was thinking I don't want to answer.

00:35:15--> 00:35:16

Anyway.

00:35:17--> 00:35:22

Yeah. Why men is that if you read something? Okay, we do have two ways now we have two ways

00:35:26--> 00:35:29

you have your habit from someone actually

00:35:31--> 00:35:33

heard Have you heard this heady for himself

00:35:35--> 00:35:37

or heard the person that he's from his own

00:35:40--> 00:35:41

talking about shipping his students right

00:35:42--> 00:35:45

oh tsunami to hurt the heat from the ship

00:35:47--> 00:35:51

he's the one who said the heavy Okay, so it's not from the students actually don't know

00:35:56--> 00:36:04

so the questions that arise now if you heard the heavy suppose for example it was the famous

00:36:05--> 00:36:12

Walkman is the one receiving it from him If man heard that from assembler, and he said he heard it from me.

00:36:21--> 00:36:24

But obviously, if you make the mistake the people around him

00:36:25--> 00:36:26

should correct

00:36:30--> 00:36:37

the case okay, but he made this close concluded since you'll be corrected he may

00:36:38--> 00:36:42

my authority, but he should still say that

00:36:44--> 00:36:50

you know, we are trying to be as exact as possible. Unable to

00:36:53--> 00:36:53

come out

00:36:58--> 00:36:59

for mental health See,

00:37:10--> 00:37:10

have minimum

00:37:13--> 00:37:14

minimum?

00:37:17--> 00:37:22

Suppose someone is in a gathering like this. The chef is reading it.

00:37:23--> 00:37:27

And someone misses a part of the heavy Can he has the one next to him what

00:37:30--> 00:37:31

have you.

00:37:34--> 00:37:38

But what about the the provinces in

00:37:39--> 00:37:40

reported?

00:37:41--> 00:37:43

provinces send them says they wouldn't be?

00:37:45--> 00:37:49

Okay. Well, he didn't hear the rest. So yes, it's probably wouldn't be

00:37:50--> 00:37:51

all

00:37:54--> 00:37:55

that heavy

00:37:57--> 00:37:57

as inside.

00:37:59--> 00:38:00

So what does that mean?

00:38:02--> 00:38:03

To the SEC, the first question

00:38:06--> 00:38:08

is, is it permissible for someone the one next thing

00:38:11--> 00:38:17

and it says permissible, but again, he should make it clear that he did not give any advice.

00:38:20--> 00:38:21

Somebody mentioned

00:38:23--> 00:38:25

that they were in the same

00:38:34--> 00:38:40

in the same meeting. Yeah, well, what they used to do, if you go to the Berlin Museum,

00:38:42--> 00:38:43

when many manuscripts

00:38:46--> 00:38:49

from the early years of these 300 cities,

00:38:50--> 00:38:51

and these manuscripts

00:38:53--> 00:38:54

look something like this.

00:38:55--> 00:38:56

You

00:38:57--> 00:38:58

the same circle

00:39:00--> 00:39:03

on the margin, they'll put the date.

00:39:04--> 00:39:05

They'll put everyone

00:39:06--> 00:39:07

in attendance.

00:39:09--> 00:39:11

Someone came late, someone's sleeping.

00:39:16--> 00:39:16

Present.

00:39:21--> 00:39:21

Really.

00:39:24--> 00:39:31

So there's some dispute like that you can go to the records, to see what Eddie perrella Let's see, was the person there and

00:39:40--> 00:39:49

then we'll get to the future if someone has ever claimed for example, you never narrated as indicated and someone else has picked up any claims that you did hear from that person. We'll get to that.

00:39:55--> 00:39:57

That man had determinacy

00:40:00--> 00:40:01

What should you do?

00:40:04--> 00:40:05

Not too many.

00:40:06--> 00:40:07

Not too many.

00:40:09--> 00:40:12

Is this allowed to narrate it from someone you have not seen?

00:40:19--> 00:40:20

Would you accept any from

00:40:25--> 00:40:25

Nana

00:40:27--> 00:40:28

Would you accept?

00:40:31--> 00:40:31

You would

00:40:36--> 00:40:37

love it.

00:40:46--> 00:40:52

Even on my phone never saw the promises and in between them promises. What's another example more important than

00:40:55--> 00:40:59

think of the hava, the ones that narrated many, many

00:41:05--> 00:41:09

line level that was related to the point

00:41:17--> 00:41:17

directly

00:41:24--> 00:41:25

from this up,

00:41:26--> 00:41:28

I'll give you a hint about the female.

00:41:31--> 00:41:33

Did I choose to never

00:41:35--> 00:41:40

forget, it used to be behind the curtain? The only ones who saw her were close.

00:41:43--> 00:41:45

So is it allowed to marry from ISIS and Do you not see her

00:41:48--> 00:41:50

you can develop with some conditions.

00:41:51--> 00:41:53

Otherwise anyone can stand behind the curve and stay on top. So

00:41:57--> 00:42:02

you have to they should maybe be someone there who knows or can go behind the curtain

00:42:04--> 00:42:06

or this was known to be replaced

00:42:08--> 00:42:10

or revert voice is well known. And he recommended

00:42:15--> 00:42:16

anything you can imagine

00:42:17--> 00:42:18

the generation

00:42:19--> 00:42:20

is renowned

00:42:21--> 00:42:22

for cases known.

00:42:25--> 00:42:29

She's from Martin O'Malley was the other lady for what?

00:42:30--> 00:42:31

Much more money

00:42:33--> 00:42:35

if you have any of these three conditions? Yeah, I'm saying

00:42:37--> 00:42:43

for a woman's not from sanity, if they say that they know her face?

00:42:44--> 00:42:48

No. We're talking about people from behind the curtain.

00:42:49--> 00:42:56

My point was I know your point you can prove this that there was an apparent gap for what your

00:42:57--> 00:43:03

in general regardless of this question from behind the curtain that makes those conditions one of those conditions you may

00:43:09--> 00:43:10

know

00:43:14--> 00:43:18

there are many other things and they also used to

00:43:20--> 00:43:22

budget for the Ministry of

00:43:24--> 00:43:25

Muslim teachers

00:43:26--> 00:43:27

to teach them behind

00:43:30--> 00:43:31

the US

00:43:33--> 00:43:34

women

00:44:03--> 00:44:06

By the way, what the well I will leave this question for just remind me I left the question.

00:44:08--> 00:44:13

Suppose the elements is part of the headings mentioned the first part of the reason it says

00:44:16--> 00:44:17

may you narrate the whole

00:44:27--> 00:44:27

thing

00:44:31--> 00:44:32

you have to say this

00:44:39--> 00:44:40

what you should do is say

00:44:44--> 00:44:46

if the headache is well known, you may add it to

00:44:47--> 00:44:48

the rest of the headache.

00:44:54--> 00:44:57

Okay, suppose you hear heavy from two areas.

00:44:58--> 00:44:59

One of them is customer

00:45:00--> 00:45:01

And the other one is not

00:45:02--> 00:45:05

when you're nervous Can you just mentioned the trustworthy one and reveal well

00:45:11--> 00:45:11

you're wrong

00:45:13--> 00:45:15

if you heard from two people

00:45:17--> 00:45:18

this is you

00:45:20--> 00:45:25

you heard anything from this person this person doesn't have the feedback.

00:45:29--> 00:45:32

This one is trustworthy, which one is weak? Or

00:45:33--> 00:45:36

can you just mention this chain and ignore the

00:45:45--> 00:45:46

music and

00:45:50--> 00:45:53

you don't care what somebody else says.

00:45:56--> 00:45:56

Okay

00:46:03--> 00:46:06

you heard it from two people one is the other one is not

00:46:07--> 00:46:08

to mention you don't have

00:46:09--> 00:46:15

so for example in a Muslim, non Muslim dad he never mentioned the weakness.

00:46:18--> 00:46:19

Always mentioned both

00:46:21--> 00:46:21

but it's not necessary.

00:46:28--> 00:46:30

Any last questions about these two?

00:46:38--> 00:46:39

You don't qualify for this.

00:46:42--> 00:46:43

The next one

00:46:44--> 00:46:44

is

00:46:46--> 00:46:48

something I don't think probably would come

00:46:49--> 00:46:49

about

00:46:55--> 00:46:55

become

00:46:56--> 00:46:57

authentic.

00:47:11--> 00:47:13

Get your question in but it sounds like something

00:47:17--> 00:47:18

I'm not sure what you're saying.

00:47:25--> 00:47:27

There's another way of transmitting headaches.

00:47:35--> 00:47:36

Number three,

00:47:40--> 00:47:40

vacation

00:47:48--> 00:47:49

this is the third one.

00:48:09--> 00:48:11

What is the agenda? What are we talking about?

00:48:15--> 00:48:19

permit to permit to give someone permission to what

00:48:23--> 00:48:23

your

00:48:25--> 00:48:26

permission to narrate your head is.

00:48:27--> 00:48:28

What the

00:48:37--> 00:48:38

first of all, he says this.

00:48:43--> 00:48:52

Then he said, this is like telling someone you have the right to lie on my authority by going and sing these songs.

00:49:02--> 00:49:03

Not everyone is like

00:49:04--> 00:49:05

so anyway, want

00:49:07--> 00:49:07

to take

00:49:09--> 00:49:10

an opening gesture.

00:49:12--> 00:49:12

It's worth it.

00:49:14--> 00:49:14

Okay.

00:49:19--> 00:49:20

Now we're talking about

00:49:22--> 00:49:24

second century onwards.

00:49:25--> 00:49:30

And this one after like the fifth century, this is perhaps the most important.

00:49:34--> 00:49:36

It is the most important

00:49:37--> 00:49:38

form of

00:49:45--> 00:49:46

abuse

00:49:47--> 00:49:47

and abuse.

00:49:51--> 00:49:52

Lovely

00:49:53--> 00:49:54

to have

00:49:59--> 00:49:59

you

00:50:04--> 00:50:05

During this meeting,

00:50:11--> 00:50:13

what does it imply? What? What?

00:50:14--> 00:50:15

What does it imply?

00:50:21--> 00:50:22

qualification.

00:50:28--> 00:50:28

None of

00:50:33--> 00:50:36

the people that I give to anyone who said lay the law.

00:50:40--> 00:50:47

Okay, it was basically used for books. And then the after, after the third and fourth century, we're talking about big books.

00:50:48--> 00:50:51

So the ship is supposed to read this big book, as I said,

00:50:55--> 00:50:55

any,

00:50:58--> 00:51:03

the shed is supposed to read this book for every student to come to them. That's what happens when

00:51:09--> 00:51:10

they begin this.

00:51:12--> 00:51:15

Were not now when I read that I read

00:51:22--> 00:51:24

when I read a book, like this,

00:51:27--> 00:51:28

and this is my shift

00:51:31--> 00:51:32

back to back.

00:51:35--> 00:51:36

So he has his

00:51:38--> 00:51:38

back.

00:51:41--> 00:51:42

So now I read this book.

00:51:44--> 00:51:46

When I read this book to him, he'll give me a certificate,

00:52:01--> 00:52:02

they would have given us a certificate,

00:52:04--> 00:52:07

give a certificate saying he read this book.

00:52:09--> 00:52:11

And therefore his name would be added to this net

00:52:13--> 00:52:14

all the way back to

00:52:17--> 00:52:28

now it's easy to do later than average. Now, no, I'm the situation, I read this book in my ship. So there's a copy of say, a buddy of mine

00:52:29--> 00:52:30

that I read.

00:52:39--> 00:52:40

Okay.

00:52:43--> 00:52:45

So I have this copy. Now I've written my shift.

00:52:46--> 00:52:47

So now you've come to me.

00:52:48--> 00:52:51

And you say you want to read or you want to

00:52:52--> 00:52:52

report.

00:52:54--> 00:52:56

So I said, Okay, you have my permission.

00:53:00--> 00:53:04

So what you have to do now is you have to find that coffee or those coffees that have my certificate.

00:53:06--> 00:53:10

And you know, you may narrate from this book on my thoughts.

00:53:11--> 00:53:12

But you have to say what

00:53:17--> 00:53:19

you have to mention that you're going to buy

00:53:22--> 00:53:34

the book for me and I gave you permission to narrate. What that means is that I'm telling you that I'm sure that this copy is authentic. I read the whole book, and you have my permission to to narrate my thoughts.

00:53:35--> 00:53:40

So I'm the one guaranteeing that this is correct. Look at my sample I read it.

00:53:49--> 00:53:51

What's wrong with it? What's wrong with it?

00:53:52--> 00:53:55

Is this a strong would you say it's as strong as the now our

00:54:01--> 00:54:02

certificate here?

00:54:04--> 00:54:07

certificates you think it might be stronger than some out

00:54:10--> 00:54:11

there some scholars have said that

00:54:13--> 00:54:14

it sounds

00:54:16--> 00:54:17

like

00:54:19--> 00:54:22

he disliked it because you get lost knowledge without any any work.

00:54:27--> 00:54:30

You don't have any knowledge, chances are you're probably going to get it

00:54:36--> 00:54:38

we have not seen anyone doing it from time.

00:54:42--> 00:54:49

We have not seen anybody doing it will become easy in this matter. The knowledge will be lost in studying would have known me

00:54:51--> 00:54:57

for the more it's not the way of the people who have not. So in the early years, there was quite a bit of dislike

00:54:59--> 00:54:59

but in

00:55:00--> 00:55:02

Later years, we're talking about big books. And

00:55:04--> 00:55:05

by the way, I forgot to mention

00:55:06--> 00:55:08

that I would like to mention

00:55:11--> 00:55:12

something I should have mentioned earlier

00:55:14--> 00:55:15

about traveling and

00:55:16--> 00:55:21

the even in some of the roads related news like

00:55:24--> 00:55:24

they've been

00:55:30--> 00:55:32

around for over

00:55:33--> 00:55:35

40 years, he did not.

00:55:36--> 00:55:40

He never left thing. That's why it's so concerning.

00:55:54--> 00:55:56

Because they never, he never saw.

00:56:01--> 00:56:03

Enough they never saw soon. And then suddenly, he never saw.

00:56:05--> 00:56:07

Because those two did not reach payments. And that

00:56:09--> 00:56:13

was familiar they have they never saw as soon as suddenly as soon as you say.

00:56:15--> 00:56:19

So one of the benefits of traveling also, is when you travel, you get to see the books in

00:56:20--> 00:56:21

different parts.

00:56:28--> 00:56:36

And what the chef will tell you is if you have my permission to narrate this book, you may take a copy of it and copy it. Sometimes they'll give you a copy to copy.

00:56:42--> 00:56:44

What are some of the problems with a jet?

00:56:52--> 00:56:54

Someone might look something in

00:56:57--> 00:56:57

your face.

00:56:59--> 00:57:05

That's why supposed to be the job of the ship out your coffee, for example. He's supposed to look at him

00:57:07--> 00:57:08

face by face.

00:57:16--> 00:57:17

If you do that, with

00:57:19--> 00:57:32

these books, we're talking about 1000s it was less than 9000 students, just his own students. You can imagine you know a few generations afterwards how many copies are around

00:57:33--> 00:57:34

about the time that

00:57:37--> 00:57:40

happened the 9000 at one of the book

00:57:41--> 00:57:42

at when

00:57:47--> 00:57:50

they go to a bar over three or four weeks.

00:57:52--> 00:57:56

Okay, this is one course for his book. Because he might did it

00:57:58--> 00:57:59

another place

00:58:00--> 00:58:04

in anything which he did for the 9000 9001 sitting

00:58:06--> 00:58:07

in the room? Yeah.

00:58:12--> 00:58:13

Over a period of about 15 years.

00:58:17--> 00:58:21

By the way, is there any proof in the some not for the gentleman?

00:58:33--> 00:58:39

Yes, more than no your points and that's more like some ideas from profit, then they go someplace. And then there is

00:58:41--> 00:58:42

one guy or a couple

00:58:43--> 00:58:47

very little from him saying give this to her.

00:58:52--> 00:58:57

But did he ever give something someone tell them after five days resist

00:59:03--> 00:59:04

the more than

00:59:09--> 00:59:11

rarely, okay, but even more than that.

00:59:16--> 00:59:18

Let's get into it.

00:59:19--> 00:59:20

Go to

00:59:23--> 00:59:24

open a

00:59:25--> 00:59:25

command prompt.

00:59:29--> 00:59:31

When you get some resistance.

00:59:34--> 00:59:37

That's the proof that all people are trying to answer and it has

00:59:39--> 00:59:39

something

00:59:43--> 00:59:44

to do with

00:59:49--> 00:59:54

it. I'm sorry. Go to work, leaving the hedge and read this to the people

01:00:00--> 01:00:01

Hasn't was making

01:00:02--> 01:00:05

for the books. Not good, that was not

01:00:13--> 01:00:13

a big difference.

01:00:25--> 01:00:26

When you read when you receive something,

01:00:29--> 01:00:36

as we said, you should mention that this was jezza. Or you may also say unbutton. In general, and by no means you

01:00:46--> 01:00:48

this is one thing that they took from Arabic

01:00:59--> 01:00:59

30 years.

01:01:01--> 01:01:03

Not an early, okay 30 years.

01:01:06--> 01:01:07

But after the standard books were written,

01:01:09--> 01:01:09

and

01:01:10--> 01:01:15

maybe two or three generations after the standard was written, it was used as a way to pass on

01:01:17--> 01:01:17

books.

01:01:19--> 01:01:20

And the short can work.

01:01:22--> 01:01:27

But as I said, it's very important that the ship is supposed to take over the copy, make sure that

01:01:30--> 01:01:32

you know, the next one is

01:01:33--> 01:01:35

somewhat similar to that

01:01:50--> 01:01:51

What is it now,

01:01:53--> 01:01:53

you

01:02:02--> 01:02:03

may be with a judge

01:02:05--> 01:02:06

or maybe without

01:02:10--> 01:02:12

other words, I may give you a book

01:02:13--> 01:02:18

and I take this book for me and I give you the permission to narrate the

01:02:21--> 01:02:24

agenda, some people consider that stronger than some

01:02:42--> 01:02:44

this book is correct, I give

01:02:47--> 01:02:48

my permission,

01:02:50--> 01:02:51

this is actually this

01:03:00--> 01:03:02

was not your hearing it

01:03:03--> 01:03:09

and you will write it down either directly or from a student by that time.

01:03:21--> 01:03:24

But, in general, this is not considered as strong,

01:03:25--> 01:03:27

but many times included,

01:03:28--> 01:03:29

included also with

01:03:33--> 01:03:42

other words, you read the book gives you the book, and then you read effect. So, you have this and this. And then if you tell you then

01:03:44--> 01:03:44

you have to

01:03:48--> 01:03:48

know

01:03:51--> 01:03:54

the relationship between them.

01:03:55--> 01:04:02

Keep your hands the student the book, and gives them permission to read the book, or scenario. Whenever that was

01:04:04--> 01:04:06

if the teacher gives the book to a student without permission.

01:04:11--> 01:04:15

And if the teacher doesn't take the call from him, but gets his permission to zap the jet.

01:04:17--> 01:04:29

With agenda, he may not give you the book, you have to go and find the book to say yes, I have my certificate copies in the northern library. So we go to the library, so he never actually gets

01:04:31--> 01:04:44

but one reason why this is preferred is because the coffee goes directly from his head. So hopefully no one has put anything into the book. And he was directed to him too. But in this case,

01:04:45--> 01:04:50

in the case of the judges, I will find another coffee or something added something and

01:04:52--> 01:04:53

could you somebody

01:04:56--> 01:04:59

could use this book after he died. In which way did he

01:05:00--> 01:05:01

Give me this first image, and then

01:05:02--> 01:05:03

we'll get to that

01:05:08--> 01:05:08

level.

01:05:24--> 01:05:28

Because the scholars, they discuss

01:05:29--> 01:05:37

if I can do some heavy, heavy, is it allowed me to marry these headings, but I'm not giving you permission, you may not know is

01:05:41--> 01:05:41

that permissible?

01:05:50--> 01:05:51

So he got

01:05:54--> 01:05:54

to that point

01:05:56--> 01:05:58

where unless he has some doubt about it,

01:05:59--> 01:06:01

he doesn't have the right to say you don't have permission to.

01:06:03--> 01:06:07

So if you if you make the number two, you,

01:06:08--> 01:06:11

you may never put at ease. But since he does not give you a chance,

01:06:12--> 01:06:15

we cannot be certain that those headings are all correct.

01:06:16--> 01:06:19

Supposedly, because you're sure that those headings are correct.

01:06:21--> 01:06:24

So that's why we're stronger than when.

01:06:37--> 01:06:37

Give him an hour that

01:06:42--> 01:06:47

says obviously, if you receive any, and this way, when you transmit it, you have to mention that

01:06:51--> 01:06:53

now is the gym, by the way broken,

01:07:05--> 01:07:07

unbroken, but it is a little bit weak

01:07:08--> 01:07:11

is not considered the same way as somehow

01:07:22--> 01:07:24

unbroken, okay? But if

01:07:25--> 01:07:30

he's headed by a winner winner, and you contradict what someone else receives.

01:07:32--> 01:07:34

The one reason I will be considered stronger than the ones

01:07:36--> 01:07:38

broken, but it's not the strongest.

01:07:44--> 01:07:46

And then exactly, from the time of the process and

01:07:58--> 01:07:59

the letter to the emperor of Rome.

01:08:02--> 01:08:04

And also, with

01:08:12--> 01:08:13

Danny, as you see,

01:08:14--> 01:08:21

there's a fine distinction between Manila and jazz, especially if you want to take it back to the phone system.

01:08:38--> 01:08:39

Unless

01:08:47--> 01:08:48

you write something

01:08:49--> 01:08:52

to someone else. Suppose you had

01:08:54--> 01:08:54

no,

01:08:56--> 01:08:59

no, that's okay. So in general, we're like

01:09:01--> 01:09:03

this good way of

01:09:05--> 01:09:06

doing

01:09:07--> 01:09:10

survey. Many people used to write letters to Maui about

01:09:14--> 01:09:15

the technical way.

01:09:18--> 01:09:19

What are some problems?

01:09:22--> 01:09:24

What are some of the conditions that we might have to

01:09:30--> 01:09:31

design everything?

01:09:38--> 01:09:43

Okay, so the seal and if you know the person seal

01:09:44--> 01:09:46

What else? What else did

01:09:48--> 01:09:49

he recognize the handwriting

01:09:54--> 01:09:56

if you know the one who's giving it to step up

01:10:01--> 01:10:02

How many have you have

01:10:08--> 01:10:10

to meet some conditions like those conditions?

01:10:20--> 01:10:21

So

01:10:33--> 01:10:34

during this time

01:10:35--> 01:10:39

and also when you receive this way obviously when you're never able to get up to

01:10:41--> 01:10:42

receive this

01:10:43--> 01:10:43

kind of written

01:11:00--> 01:11:01

What do you think about

01:11:03--> 01:11:04

12

01:11:05--> 01:11:05

minutes

01:11:18--> 01:11:24

that's one of the conditions in order to solve the problem today Is

01:11:29--> 01:11:30

that sufficient

01:11:39--> 01:11:41

now he also had his own well known

01:11:44--> 01:11:47

dignitaries they had their own feelings

01:11:49--> 01:11:50

used to have American

01:11:52--> 01:11:53

where they're like what the clothes

01:11:54--> 01:11:56

you cannot open it without breaking

01:11:57--> 01:11:58

either breaking the paper or breaking

01:12:00--> 01:12:02

the papers broke broken.

01:12:03--> 01:12:04

Like you know those

01:12:05--> 01:12:08

drugs nowadays. The tough seals broken don't

01:12:11--> 01:12:13

check back with the sender.

01:12:15--> 01:12:17

You may have to check back.

01:12:28--> 01:12:29

You may make

01:12:35--> 01:12:37

the very last question at the end of

01:12:42--> 01:12:44

the sufficient when it when you send something