Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 9
Date:
Channel: Jamal Zarabozo
Series: Jamal Zarabozo - Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth
File Size: 18.90MB
AI Generated Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of knowing the proper way to interpret a narrative and comparing headaches in narratives to the headache in real-life. They stress the importance of checking for accuracy and avoiding double counting. The conversation also touches on headaches and media coverage, with a focus on the use of negative language and hateful behavior. The speakers briefly mention the importance of avoiding physical contact with people affected by the virus.AI Generated Transcript ©
Today we want to talk about law
name
of the director.
They want to talk about
what did we say before? What do we mean by
quickly?
Remind me more.
proficiency is what we mean that we give some more details about it.
If for example, someone is narrating it from a book, from his books, we say it.
Okay. Let's put it another way, I suppose. Is there any any from this memory? We say vote is
very, very heavy from memory we're seeing
the P remember script
was very heavy from a book we say Bob cook. Correct. He writes the thing down properly. And he's able to
say how do we see it? How do we test the the narrative? And
what were some of the means by which the score is used to check
with others?
How do you
know we didn't know? We're moving on?
Let's
say,
for example,
there's any
one way one way before he felt was this compared with other more specific other students.
with other students have the same Check In other words,
for example, like I gave the example earlier,
in rain forest, the books of hammers and Selma to 1700 students
have this purpose was to differentiate the mistakes of combat? How would he know the mistakes of combat
medic students, that is going to read the books of the combat to 17 of hammers students.
His goal was to know how much mistakes and to know the mistakes of the students. How is he going to know that
the students to do okay help students
prepare how everyone narrated the same thing. And supposedly they get heavy from the same day, someone very differently than the other 16.
What about the mistakes
if all seven of them narrate the headache in the same way,
and that way is wrong, compared to all the other luminaries that he knows them from?
Even Muslim was discussing
the introduction to his height?
The heavies about one innopolis came to the provinces.
The province of Sivan was praying. The numbers originally stood on one side of him, and then the province moved him to the other side.
So what's that and he recently
released it on the left and moved him
to the right.
One of the this is heavy it
was narrated by easy
narrated by the name of Yeezys. from
quite a
while the way that the way is deteriorating, he said that first on the right, and the process and
so, what he did is he studied how all the students have great narrative narrated and all of them said that even occurs, the person on the left and the process.
So, therefore, he was able to see that the mistake was from music.
narration
is even more awards in
an English
book everything is not to confuse anyone.
He was another way to check the validity of a narrative
to check this Harry's with
those
examples that
we talked about the beginning of that year.
When did it begin to hover? We said there's two types of sex and also this.
One we call the time series.
These two are crossing.
What did we mean by
the cosmic
sequence of
the marathon?
Did you miss that lecture
that you check to check the person's narration of the same edits over time? Does he always narrate the same way or the narrative in different ways, thereby making some mistakes, sometimes
you have something you'd like to share with the rest of
what's another way?
That is I give the example earlier two lectures ago about Aisha when she had the
same ad over a year's time. So you take the person over time is still there any of the same way or every time you need making some changes and making some changes?
What else?
Okay.
Between
oral and written narration.
I was 11 years old.
He was there in some heavy
hauling.
Excuse me, that's wrong.
He says he gave the incorrect was 11 years old.
monitoring.
If you have their
book with you, you can check to see the way so he went inside his house in the mosque. And he found his book and he found that it was his memory was at stake. And it was the way it was. So that's one way comparison between oral and recorded. NARRATION
and there's an example of that from a scholar by the name of the commander of an army who never
Heidi from our era concerning the love of prayer,
that during the summer, it should be pretty early in the span
of Azhar corrected him and said this is from overseas and from mobile data
took a great deal when he went back home and he from he was from a different town, when he returned to his town, he checked his books. And he found that that was was correct it was promoted. So, he wrote there was around and he said, Please tell everyone that there is a need to
return and
he said to be embarrassed and this jr is better to be punished.
restriction labor is basically
the comparison
between what someone narrates, in between the headache that someone there is and
or
also stronger.
compare what the person is narrating with what the Quran says. And what
stronger authorities and stronger heads
and perhaps I should
sometimes as effect affect the metaphor
as it was well known for correcting the misunderstanding of minions.
Like once you heard the
talk about the word was in the grave, he said that the person in the grave is being punished because his family's crying. He saw a Jewish person being very, he said that person is being very is being punished because of their crime.
Why is your when when she heard that she said
mercy in
the provinces and said that they are running over him? What do you think punishment
wasn't the way I send this to this is something that matter which has
to be punished because of the crime.
There's a book by a scholar by the name of the shoe
and which she
takes me in the front.
He wrote the book, compiling those,
he corrected the other.
Anyway,
I will not go into the
book.
Now the book,
the Erasmus
the trip to Asia,
the drug
is going to be you know
never
some of the ways that they used to check to make sure that the narrative is public because they find they're making lots of mistakes by these means. Then Yanni
will make some mistakes as me we reject them completely.
None of you would have finished your best.
So what you do is you can have great
Tableau
Just like the students like emetic
people, we're specialists here. And then you find some people who made more and more mistakes, but not gross errors, small mistakes, grow, there's something else
gross error or something. And you cannot imagine someone who was awkward who never had eaten this way. This is what they call
big errors that something
small.
Besides checking that also, they would make sure that they would not accept narrators for example, who
were known to sneak during class.
All your
they will not even exist your code allows us to
remove that person from the class.
Because that person is getting some information as we correct halfway incorrect is going to say that that ship said it.
So for his own safety, you should remove that person.
Although they will not
they will not accept any part of someone is
if he's good in his narrative from his books,
from books,
I have strong
memory.
They will also reject the narrator's who would accept or not support the practices?
Can you have someone
let's first define
somebody to say something
was it what it means in the case of
psychos knife
into your head is right there
without checking his books, without being able to know whether there was any tape.
So they used to test some people by saying you narrate information such and such. And they know that you did not
accept this and they
said no longer.
They are also not the seminarians who are not
sure if we're not careful about taking
the coffee, for example, or narration, when people make copies of books,
if the chef doesn't check it, to make sure it's correct, this guest sums up.
And if for example, I give you a heavy book,
and you just copy it, and I let you go without checking to make sure to copy it.
Kind of narrator also didn't
care too much.
And lots of time.
We're talking about our DNA.
Don't try
to do something like asking another student.
Well, the important thing is that coffee is checked with us. Maybe it's not important that you visit and so
coffee has to be checked with
what's best to ask someone who knows even harder to memorize the Book to check.
So now we have we have the client who was above any question about love.
concern
was
for someone who doesn't check ganic coffees with the
original coffee
and the number six and oh, this is number six. What is the checking someone's health check
for things that will make them for me.
Number one is someone who sleep or doesn't pay attention to class or plays with his children also
Yeah great.
Yeah. Yeah.
He loves himself to be drugged in the class
you should
the third one is getting big to check copies. So free
shipping, kids are
born.
Again, if you receive a book from it, yes. And he says those are my headings, you should come to my copy and check with us.
Careful
also, this means is not vote, because muscle
damage just making sure even your own ideas or
any questions about
his net worth discussing detail.
Now, we've discussed in detail
in general, if someone is both either they call him
or trustworthy.
But obviously,
not everyone is at the same level. You cannot say that everyone was able to have some votes at the same level.
But the important thing for what we're talking about now is everyone has to be
but there's different degrees
where there is to be such as everyone has to be
that important thing it for what we're talking about so far that the person has to be
what we have different degrees of
no matter how good he is, in memory and writing and Teddy's are rejected
no matter how good he is and writing he has a PhD in economics doesn't matter. And he has Eddie's will be rejected and come down here
no matter how excellent he is in writing and
it will be rejected.
Among those people who are added we have a large red
t keeps people busy with
so this is
when you read what the scores did above certainly Raiders, they use specific terms. those terms not all mean the same thing.
Some terms are much stronger than others.
So what we have here
are the different categories of narrators. According to the
terms rising.
He has six categories six ranks.
For now we added one display and even had two heads.
Looking at this looking at the first category, we're talking about
the A plus two
and they use the superlative
adjective in describing the
most trustworthy of the people.
Don't ask about the person.
No one does no one similar to more I don't know
how
to
do have a second line or the second line also, there's a while missing.
He also used to be on the second line
back,
we'll get to that.
But those first 10 people whose heads or any there
there are very few people, some of them people like inequality. So can I get him tonight? Remember medic, this can be
second category.
Again, it would suffer if they had a tendency to use daddy more than once.
Sometimes he was six or seven. But usually it's
like the second one
up on
my
blog
authority.
That is again,
Chevy would be like the first or second category
that he was talking about.
The third category.
The first two categories, we're talking still at the top level and
even the third category still, we're at the high level. We haven't lost that much involvement, but they are not as experts in personal
terms you'll you'll read if you read a book called
these are the terms that you will find quoting dirty scars. Yeah, you should know what they mean proximately.
So the first three categories, we're talking about people whose hobbies are such as they will not need any supporting evidence by themselves their
first weekend.
Second,
the second or third category,
the second category.
The second get over, but include people that have to learn and use the shift to local party
score.
Now we come to the fourth category, look what's happening now.
We're starting to lose a little bit.
And in general, the narratives in Hollywood be from the first two categories, the first three categories.
Now, as I said, there is there
there either we're not we're not when we move down, we're not talking about changes in the middle.
They're all the same as
someone who was known to the auditors would make as many mistakes as preferred to someone who is known to be large and never makes mistakes.
He doesn't make mistakes.
And as you see in the terms that they use,
they use terms which are not like their new terms like
there's no problem with him. Nothing wrong with him.
And he looks
very strongly fish the narrator's in the fourth category
they make
any sport category we have
from
the bottom of
the table.
And you will find areas like that in the collection, for example, but what they would say, what's above.
So
as I said before,
the first three categories are all just one category. And now we add another category.
Another one
all think of something like
sometimes they disappear.
The next category notice,
again, the level of bullets falling to war.
What does this term mean here?
Which means a
man.
But
for the most part, for the most part, his aides are similar to
me better he's
not you
know, he makes mistakes.
But
notice that he knows these terms
give the impression that he is the is okay with respect to
this person. The people in this category we recorded but they are not accepted by the
fifth category.
Do they have copies?
The fifth category, they're heavy, they're not by themselves.
They are they've got what you might find a headache.
And you record the headache and you look for corroborating evidence you look for other people who support them, since we don't have any question about their ads, and we know that they're not fabricated, but they're making mistakes. So we record the ad, we find other people supporting them narrating it the same way. Then we took the heavy look by themselves we do not.
In other words, they
can either weak by themselves
and can be
one of those There is a saying that you'll find areas from this category in
the next category.
You make gross errors. Remember gross errors are different problems because those errors is smaller.
Ready
to tell you where we can write whatever you want.
Near the end of his life guide, he begins to change and go down
to surescripts.
Which ones to say?
Which one?
You wouldn't say the one.
Those by the way that hasn't had it or
does not mean that it's okay. For us. Noticed that hasn't been easy. We'll find him in the fifth category.
And he notices are good but they're not good enough.
We have to be familiar with these terms. Otherwise when you read them, you'll come to the wrong conclusion.
started to lose
money I'm saying that if you say about African Afro
is born in Aikido for
a ride, studied with
Dieckmann
Mohammed Ahmad is a daughter that he
hasn't had, he
hasn't had the in this case and the description of the person does not mean that it either has
or good but not
all
of
you will use these terms for the people in the fourth category, you've used these terms to know
which one is better
other people's apartments
for the fourth
for this category.
The sixth category is again a little bit less.
And it shows that they have
some question about
I hope, I hope there's nothing wrong with
these people also you record them
they cannot be used for example as supporting evidence for the people from the tip category. They will not be used as supporting them. But if you find many people of that category, many narrating the same thing. And you might
visit heavy
if you find losses
from them, otherwise they're heavy. They
are bringing some examples then
we discussed some actual
recording.
Not to be recorded
should be up and there's another one that should be
way. way That's correct.
Once in the end the fourth category, it shouldn't be that vd.
soldiers in charge of crypto before me in putting all the above points.
The first one says that the hoard should be level.
But we will discuss it
must be.
Yeah.
Valley or you're finding a budding Muslim in general, there are narrated from people of the first weekend
before
he discusses what everyone says about them, and then he comes to his own use of the same term.
Have any questions about
this is when you read almost any book on headings, or any book relate to any collection of hobbies? Most likely, you're going to come across these terms.
When they talk about any narrative,
and other books, or books or books of different dimension, the narrator and then they'll use these terms. So you should realize that they are different levels. And what's the one thing
is the only one who married is
rejected.
Although you should realize that this some
some callers had their own specific terminology, we don't have time to go into everyone's terminology. But sometimes they would say some things one time and say the opposite another time. There was no contradiction between.
For example,
sometimes if if someone says about the narrator's it is,
it does not necessarily mean that his hobbies are acceptable.
Or they might be the best to be
or less happy, but
and this doesn't necessarily mean also that Teddy's rejected or sometimes you have to think you have a look at the way the question was asked.
Do you have to look into more detail and see how the question was asked? Because what they used to say, for example, if I asked you
have agreements, the chef or chef
asked me what do you think about knife? And whenever?
And he says that Vanessa is
what do you mean by that is relative to knife?
So you have to look closely to see how the question was asked how in what context? He says
take a break now Any questions?
Nobody
knows that.
Yeah, yeah, of course. Yes. based on information that people from that person time
recorded.
Yeah, you could, you could but now things are a little bit different because the way things are recorded.
It's very easy nowadays. Because you have everything recorded and with you. And you can check in and make corrections and all the books are published or
Muscle forming their own homes, and many of them are molested. So things are a little bit different.
But of course, you still have to check to make sure that
the puppy
is it missing either one
proficiency that he is gravely missing
when they're starting to proficiency and he has to be very weak,
very weak, but he has to be weak for us to reject anything.
Because remember, we said with a second of all the
upper level and then we came down there. This is like a sixth category that I've talked about.
Pretty much between accepting and rejecting
someone that has even that anyone down here is heavy.
With a lot of people make lots of mistakes, we cannot trust with this thing.
But if anyone has any
blemish over here, any defects with respect to Harry's origin?
anyway?
So someone is known to be a for example, very honest, or and he has a very weak memory, he will still be preferable to someone who is known to have a good memory but not
because in the first case, we are sure that he is not fabricating or making things. On the second case, we're not sure.
A judge he was asked about what kind of people will give a general description of what kind of people we don't mistake it from and then we'll describe in detail.
judges said what kind of people we should not accept heavies from he described forth as
the one who narrates rejected he was the one who narrates it that the scores are agreed upon or not correct.
The liar
The one who makes many errors,
and the one who insists on following mistakes, even though has been shown that the honesty
last category all those people who are not willing to admit their mistakes, they make a mistake, and is shown to them that this is a mistake. And I mean, so clearly what the narrative is,
yes, you reject he refuses to correct
that kind of person we don't accept
it, because you will be saying things and whether you like it or not, he will never admit that he was
describing people who will not
question right.
The third one will make many errors
anymore.
The one who never rejected
this categories includes, for example, people who had ease the scores and integrate scores of hate have never heard of
that
is also good people are suspected of lying.
saying that these are included
to hold
the role because the head is the
narrative in which all the scholars agree that these headings are wrong. In other words, Danny, we know this
These are not correct and he's very mean that is
because the the people that he got he claimed to get the tape from them apparently the guy we just
saw but yeah, remember we thought that
nagarik, for example describes what kind of people love to take honey from
my medic describe for testing,
what is the competence? Sophie,
the journey has led even if the people there is headed.
Number two a person who lies while talking. And he was speaking in general, although he's never been accused of lying.
Even if he's never been accused of
a person who follows his own
desires are what imposed other people to his
what we call the melody
without
calling other people.
And a person who is Johnny
very devoted,
worships a lot.
Yet he has no idea about the sons of God, he is not
qualified.
He may pray all night long. But when you hear something and repeated Danny repeats
what we'll discuss we'll discuss the seven categories some of them will not discuss now.
Even though
even if someone fast every day and preys on it doesn't matter. And if he doesn't, if he doesn't know how to pass on any properties.
The categories we'll discuss here
are people have been at number one.
The people who are reviled or abused the
people who are unknown.
In general, people who are going to reject makes it today for these people. These are the categories that discuss they're pretty much the category in general.
Number three people who are unknown
not as powerful
as it was now
number four are people who are liars.
Number five or
number four lottery
number five are people who have committed to believe
those worshippers who
people tell stories
with some kind of deception
number six are people are careless or make lots of mistakes.
And number seven, those people who make mistakes together and last in mind,
put them in the same category because I'm not going to.
I'm just mentioning them first. Like an introduction. Welcome, you have an introduction that
doesn't give you time here.
So first of all has been up
Okay,
let's just set this in general.
Is there any reason to reject
the heading?
a fabricator?
Okay.
One thing we have to be careful about people do that is that
they might hear something. By the way, I've done this with Christians as
you read through them a specific verse in the Bible, one that they use all the time
using the Son of God.
And you ask them to repeat the verse exactly as they heard it, they'll always repeat it wrong, because they'll always add an extra word. Flying diseases is the only thing
that has a bleed no matter how you read them. When you ask them to repeat it, they're gonna repeat it wrong.
People are built out the same way.
They have their belief when they hear that any immediate effect in their mind.
Their mind.
There was a study done in the United States, about 15 years ago, they should have done it as a group of white people in the room. But for white people, it showed a film of a monkey want to hear from New York
where you're walking down the street.
So they show a picture of money.
In the picture, there's a black guy walking down the street and a white guy comes with a knife.
They asked them who they ask the people in the brown 40 white people so
almost all instances.
Mind they have already no matter what they do. in their mind, they already have something. So when it comes with this to the people that
we especially have to be careful when they never had this support.
What this means also, of course, we have to understand what's
enough to know the different groups
to see anyone in the LDR
Okay, what about calories, which has nothing to do with that?
Is there any reason to reject
that?
We
ready?
Were saying don't exist, because we cannot be sure that he is everything. In other words, loving him
because he has some very
40 white people in the class
or the black eye has shown the football game the scores 3017 Yes. And what was the score they came
up with?
We have to divide the people of different categories.
To believe this it is
the first obstacle for us says
you'd like someone who was
better than me
between this Before we go further into two categories
one
and the other one was not calling
within this category.
Now, the first category
we said
some time ago that we cannot get away from Canada.
good reasons why we have to mention them again. What does that imply for this?
Okay, no way no way
to reject the hate of narrators who follow up without it.
There's no
also the students of
the students.
He said and this is perhaps the best
difference between Cooper and cat
and if someone could be doing something which is cool, but he doesn't realize he doesn't know that it's wrong.
So he says that if someone's denied, one of the pieces are denied something which is known through what they call em Marathi and it's something that no Muslim could deny. For example, this is the the Quran is the book of Allah
the Prophet Muhammad is the founder of
the
five senses a prayers
if someone denies these things at all it's handy to do
that
because
every and even small kids and
so he says those people who are rejected complete
those people who are less than that to me there was actually a corporate fatality must be based on some
clear, not obvious to everyone is that that's a separate
category.
lecture
will know about this category. Why do they English now between that
between those people who call us and
why did they make the most
try to make
those who are calling forth they're trying to make the put their bid as a good way
that might include
scripture twisting,
changing heads.
So in general,
these people we have
Be very careful about
what about the one who doesn't go?
To be? Okay, again, it is more acceptable because then we have no evidence that you might change things. In order to support this today. We've got someone who's actually actually trying to bring someone to do that. And
I'll get to what I mean by that
possibility that
has been exposed.
Phil, we don't see any except
two new results except in haze which support this
because of that,
you may have heard it from other people. And he just says
that he should mention who inherited from and we know those people.
But the question is, when we talk about narrating, the question is question of either mobile
with respect to these people who are not calling to their beloved.
We have no
a priori, a priori
we have no reason to believe from the beginning this is not
this.
So we may accept this head even though it's from as
long as they are not supporting
lot of
different questions, we'll get to that when we talk about
this category.
We have a question about any we cannot be disturbed about this being
so in this category, we rejected pennies unless we prove that the person
was caught.
What we mean by that is this is something
that we call the bid out we call this
but doesn't mean that the person has capital
before
any war entered the supporters of and
very strongly against the supporters
Well, there's some good out which is hard to say what it is
they were very carefully seeing what
I mean.
So, in general, in general, even with the people have been asked the question boils down to this
unless we know the depth group a bit that makes it permissible to fabricate at ease and support that there
was a group like
many of them they used to when they estimate they be told up says we used to get together and fabricate and even then this was our team we would distribute it to the people
that you would take it from anyone except that possibly it was
okay to fabricate it. And so, if we know that that
permits the fabrication of heads that we reject all the nerves.
In general, the question is a question of approval.
So just because the person is from without does not necessarily mean that attendees will be rigid.
It can be required.
It can be recorded, it can even be accepted.
You know, some of them and some of those people
are and by themselves, especially their generation from this domain, there was many people from the group that they're called Shia at the time. We talked about the difference between Shia
he's from the Shall we have more?
That's more than that and they believe that it was
the best
because
they agree having a
buddy of mine that is
that's why they chose him in that order.
Okay, so this is Annie
was the those people know that there are many of them were great scholars.
And we cannot reject it just because
yeah.
Even hearing it
if you just ask him, you know, was there audio of
Harry Potter World known in favor of
the blackface of
proving the status of
the facility that they're seeing?
What I'm saying is that they are not necessarily bringing this we don't know to support them to that. We know that it
was they are maybe giving it more emphasis or interpreting it a little bit differently than everyone else.
Because it says a well known from the hover they agree that the best one and
even
he says the same thing.
He said to me the best
he said yeah, he always said that the
game was overlooked in the process of
looking around
this way
up to
the history of
what I was about
to order
I should not be
outside.
You can find the
reports from talking about
Dustin Hoffman,
he was one of
the better.
The question
even when,
even when people have been asked a question
well, this is why for example if he goes to his body
Okay, if you go to say Buhari and say a Muslim,
and you take the narrator's from side bodies and Muslim
you will find 16 from the Moto G.
Seven from the last 26 from the sciac 29 from the positive ear, one from the gentlemen to from the heart Harare has
One from the Olivia auroria is a group of the
people I described.
I think it's an atmospheric book I think
you'll find quickly 16 from Murcia seven from philosophy 26 from the continent of Africa, one from Jamia two from the haria. The lock of here
is also say the Quran was neither created nor it wasn't
that.
So any questions about that?
Is there any
any questions about
second category
that I mentioned are those people who can eat
the things that improper things about this abuse or violence
among these people, we can divide them into three categories. The
first category
is those people who abuse them in such a way that they call most of them could call
professedly.
Any, for example,
in their book of highest good, so
they say that, after the death of the Prophet says, All of this harbor war apostates once again, except Mecca dad was the man who was
mentioned these three.
Yeah, it is not included. Fatima is not included, hasn't represented not.
Sometimes, you have to think even if you're
included among this group, and even
people like me, who wrote in his book on Islamic governments, the accused of fabricating any any accused similar than
this one.
But number two,
are those people Yanni who cursed the Sahaba?
Swear them
among the Annie, Mr. W about these people, some say this is Yannick Cooper reserved
in some states is not
those
for
those who say it's not reserved, they say this person should be solved and imprisoned until he dies.
We're dividing we're dividing the good the first group and for sure we have to reject it because they're doing something which goes against something well known from the Quran, which is all this other miracle gathers that
something well attempts,
second group it could be something like this.
For
two things, one opinion says
that the person should be present and
get the third category
as the people who say something about
like the type of pencil, but not like
thing he was just a hobby was
54 he was a coward.
This is also
small
you
gonna
save color
but it's not as great as the second case.
And it mostly this discussion is about one group that
they're the ones until now and I need to go to Iran is to make soap
and for this reason me there should be
giving an example
any question he
gets forgotten
the third group so people
like
to call him
he should be he should be asked to be repentant to repent
from the third category.
So, any questions about downstem
Okay,
then we'll stop there. We will begin next time