Fiqh of Worship #11 – Nullifiers of Wudoo’

Okay, so the nullifier is a Boo. Boo now aka is the plural of NACA.

NACA is the plural of NACA

meaning nullifier or inverted ater before we talked about before we start to read from Kodama hakimullah, what are the modifiers abodo that all the scholars agree on by consensus. So, those are the modifiers stood or when the from the anus urine Matthew where the penny discharged from

you know,

stool or went from the back urine mazzy where the these are two different types of secretions fluids that come out from the front made Oregon,

see men and menstrual and postpartum blood from the respective Oregon's and complete loss of consciousness or sanity, hardening validators by consensus and validators by consensus. So, impure things impure things that come out from the back or the front. impure things that come out from the back or the front. In addition to complete loss of the intellect, are now opted in validators by consensus, then we will disagree on the rest.

But the things that are invalidated by consensus are impure things that come out from the back or front and

complete loss of intellect, then email Kodama starts by saying, well, he has a BA, Kalahari, domina Sabina they are seven what exits from the private parts, what exits from the private parts.

And in the Ambani method, it is what ever exists from the private parts. Because in the hand belly method, it is just anything that the exit from the

front or the back.

Does that include stones and worms? Yes, in the hand, very math heavy, yes. Does that include that according to the consensus? No, because we said the consensus is impure things coming out from the front or back would invalidate the loop. So what about pure things such as worms and stones,

when not, according to magic and the Harry's, but when according to the majority in pure, pure things, stones and worms and stuff, where you know,

when and validate the will do according to the majority, not according to magic handlebar Harry's. So that is it is just, you know, try to remember what we're saying here and don't you know, get yourself confused.

But if you want to know a little bit about this agreement, we'll try to simplify this you know, because I know that it could get confusing, and I know that it does take away It takes away from my own ability to master the Hanbury method. Because comparative effect does detract from your ability to ascertain the positions of your own method, because we're limited human beings, we have this much capacity to work with. So, if you deem that knowing about the other mazahub and knowing about where they come from, has a greater importance for you then basically being the most erudite verifying person in your mouth then you will accept that trade off, you will accept to be less as the sort of

verify in your mouth have to go out.

So you either go deep core you go wide, and you as a human being you have limited capacities. You can go deep and wide at the same time. But you do need some depth. So you do need to have some particularly if you are interested students have knowledge. You do need to have some firm feet in one school in one math have to go in to go out to white before you go deep enough.

And then he can go out white. So and and you could do this also in increments deep, wide, deep, wide. But if you go out wide before you have gone deep into any mess that could be very devastating.

Just like very tiring, because you say all of the information you will have in your mind will be

not grounded, you will not be solid on anything. But certainly there is a trade off, and there is a compromise, I accepted that compromise. Like, you know, sometimes I feel that it is taken away from my ability to basically ascertain the positions of the hand very method that I study, other than just familiarize myself with them, I don't become good at any other method, like really good at any other method. And at the same time, it takes away from my ability to be to master my own method, yet, I decided that for me, it is more important that I have this exposure to the other mother. And, and that is a decision people like people could certainly disagree over the rationale, this is my

rationale. So trying to remember the positions and are able to put them on. And

you see when they bring like part of the picture in focus, and the rest of the picture is hazy like this, you know, new pictures are receiving a picture. So it tried to do this set, you know, comparative fat, send it back to the back of your mind quickly so that you could have some clarity

and so that he could discern the positions of revenue for them. While you're listening here. Just whenever I read for revenue padana try to keep this in the front and push the whatever commentary I give you to the back.

So I'm sorry to minister Beeline whatever exits from the front or the back according to the honeyberries. All of that would modify. We said that pure things will not modify according to the Maliki's and the VA headings such as worms and stones. When did the Maliki's basically walk away from that principle when it comes to this when it comes to female charges. When it comes to female discharges, the Maliki's said female discharges would notify the widow joining forces with the three other mazahub which is Hana fees. shafa is adhan Belize. So now we have the agreement of the forum as I that normal female discharge was not advisable. We did talk before about normal female

discharge being pure in the Hanbury method and it is pure in the Hanbury method. But it does not apply that will do because in the hunt animals have, regardless of the purity or impurity, female discharges nullify that will do my own personal preference, which I believe extremely strongly in is in the husband's position. And even though it is outside of the former's I have an aversion to positions outside of the form of that is commendable.

But it does not mean that the truth is confined within the form of because their agreement is not a consensus of their own. And if we make if a consensus of their own, there is no basis for this and the deen whatsoever the agreement of the for those for great great great scholars is a consensus of them. This has no basis in the deen and the poor and or this one. So, departure from the position that is in agreement and the forum as I have is not completely unwarranted when we talked about some of the many laws in Muslim countries, the department when it comes to the fleet of horses in one we talked about how they took a man's position which is not which is countered that an agreement of the

foreigners

but the agreement of the forum as I have should serve as a warning sign for the Motorhead to proceed with caution and for the non which I had to stop.

So you have an agreement as a form of like you have a yellow sign. If you are a metalhead, proceed with caution. If you are anonymous, the head stop. You know because it's just it is completely honey you know, unwise for a nun which the head to go against the agreement of the form of that. Now I am taking the husband's position. He is a cabinet has made a huge mistake is an enormous mistake. People who you know this, this regard is in the house and I don't agree with them.

So ignorant

Here said that female plus charges do not nullify the will do.

Because even you know, mafia, the other one I said could no longer have to suffer at all could rasulillah salam say and we used to not consider sofa and qudra, turbid and yellowish this charges at during the time of the prophet SAW them to be anything we did not consider them to be anything we did not consider them to be anything meaning anything consequential, so, they are neither impure nor they do do they nullify the will boo did the Prophet ever say that women have to always be watching their their normal, this charges these this charges and sometimes we're biased where human beings were biased my being a physician makes me biased my understanding of what those this short This is

basically like tears for the eyes, these this is just like the this is just like tears for that. So, physiological discharges that are constantly being produced, they come out when they accumulate and extend to where they overflow, so that but those discharges are always there. So, I cannot imagine that the shadow the legislator Allah would put this much hardship

on women. So

he raised what I said now

push it back, have enough for them and says that these this is my personal position. If you want to take it for your own practice that that is fine because it's the position of any man which the head has and it has some backing or the counter position does not have

like a solid proof interpret and or the sudden and this has some backing and these are monthly we did not consider turbid or yellowish this charges to be anything during the time of the province of Alberta. So

what did they say about those they notified because whatever exits from the private parts nullifies the

next

mama said what hurry to notice minute Mensa lol button Eva fattoush

impure discharges from elsewhere in the body if they are excessive enough to be repulsive. Basically, anything that comes out from the private parts will nullify or will do

any excessive or give a frat house any repulsive MP or here it has to be impure, anything that is repulsive and impure that comes out from any other part of the body will nullify your will do

to me means what? bleeding

and all kinds of discharges pus and stuff they you know in

somebody's mouth have they consider this to be notice. And if this not just comes out from any part of your body that hafeez agree with your the hunt buddies, I agree with

you out of respect, you know what if I was older, so the hunt buddies agree with the hunter fees here. So they both agree that any impure, the charges that come out from elsewhere in the body would nullify your model will nullify your auto demand keys and shafa is do not agree with

me I took the side of the mannequins and Sharpies, the because

the mannequins and shafa is a party. You know, and I have this in the book you could read, you know, I don't want to spend time on things that you could read in the book because you shouldn't be reading

read whatever Buhari says in his book, you know the statement you know, he reports it from Allah and Muhammad Ali

Hanafi from others from taboos that they did not consider blood to be another fire alpha to Norma and a person. They said that someone who did hijama does not need to repeat this will do hustle and bustle he said Masada Muslim will feature a hottie and Muslims continue to pray in their wounds while wounded and the bleeding basically did not prevent them from that. And here we are not nabby Alpha spit out like blood and did not repeat this will do an abnormal part or burst a boil

and blood came out and he did not repeat his will do so based on these reports. The magic is in chapter

decided to work Americanisms referees shows that

blood bleeding does not nullify your will do. Now, given this discussion, you know,

what if someone because here in behind very must have we distinguish between what comes out whatever comes out from the private parts and whatever comes out from the rest of the body, whatever comes out from the rest of the body has to be impure to nullify your will do. So, if someone for instance has a

sort of like gastric tube and stuff comes out from this or colostomy and stool comes out from this,

for that stool will nullify their will do unless it is constant, because it is empty or it will modify the will do, but if when they came out from this does not nullify it, although in the Hanbury method because when this not impure, when the will nullify that will do only if it comes out from the private parts, but not from A to from Lost material or something of that nature.

So, is this clear, at least to get the hang of it melted down.

So, we have the private parts and the rest of the body what ever comes out of the private parts what ever comes on over what nullify that will do from the rest of the body it has to be impure, what is impure by his or the serious and goodness this charges you know, pass hand blood these are the impure things that we'll come up with above

it repulsive and that is every positive and Hanbury Mazda means what repulsive to you can indivisible your individual basis you know, he is repulsive to you, it's just like too much.

So, you know, and in the manner in the Hanafi method they made this by the determine that I'm in Beverly is what they go by, which is called the Beverly because for the Muse has like a mark like

sort of a hyper pigmented mark on the inner side of their front legs. That mark is the size of the home that they use to make and so they call the government beggary and that is the Durham that the Hanafi so it's it's about the size

if it is more than this than that, they will tell you that it is too much that you that it does break the

blood in the

urine

that comes out

Yeah, I would say from other than the private parts it has to be it has to be fast. It has to be fast. It has to be has to have some volume like that. Yes.

But you guys you understand that we're just trying to clarify concepts that are we're missing we'll but we'll come back and then so that

I have this one out I'm sorry plan and I thought that

so with a water Lockley in the now so we're done with this and we're done with the you know, impurities from the body first was actually Illa and now Maria said jellison Alka in loss of intellect except for light sleep, why and sitting or standing? loss of intellect except for light sleep while sitting or standing.

Loss of intellect? Why does loss of intellect purify MPa nullifier will do because you don't know what happened to you when you lost your intellect is just as simple as that. So the prophet SAW Solomon said and this was reported by a widowed family or the other man who had I in no criteria I'm sorry, Allah hi nanny, we can say, feminine nanofibrillated the two eyes are the string that ties the aim is that is

meaning as long as the eyes are open, then one is that aware of what's coming out of him.

We can say from a non affiliate word that to whoever falls asleep, let him make wudu because once you close it once your eyes are closed and you're unaware anymore, then you could have passed when Who told you that you can pass when you're asleep. For instance.

So loss of intimate sleep

and then

bypassing our which is the favorable analogy or the greater analogy.

Lots of intellects through coma through insanity when also not a fire will do. That's by agreement between the scholars. But let's go back to sleep, the sleep always deprive you of awareness even if it is light, no it does not. That is why we got into this.

We got into some details when it comes to sleep. So he said here 11 normally so here

are 11 now Maria Sierra was out of luck Leila. Now Maria said there is an element loss of intellect except for light sleep when sitting or standing. Because Hannah Sydney, Malik said Gann who

also lives in the Los Alamitos

home some years ago not at all though they used to wait for the purposes of waste wait for the profit to come out for Aisha during the during his time solo Salah until their their heads dropped and then they would

rise up to the prayer and pray without will do so let's have their heads chopped meaning that they fell asleep. But that's the fell asleep while sitting in some reports by Apple the older and bizarre it even said that they fell asleep while lying. So, that is why that is why some of the scholars

that is the position that isn't me I chose also said that now there has to be a really deep sleep to nullify your will do but light sleep in any position will not modify your will do now push this to the back keep in the front hypno kodamas position he you know, because that is the authorized temporary position.

Line sleep while sitting or

course.

Any other position like even light sleep another fighter will do. So reclining lying row and record Institute. Some people fall asleep Institute right? Particularly

you know,

here in America, it's not an it's not that common. But if you go back to Egypt and your egos pray behind certain Messiah in Egypt, you're very likely This is not

but

anyway, going back

lots of intellect.

Yeah, like check us out. You know, some of you may know, I was in Egypt and Kira. Yeah. So if you go pray

if you would be very lucky if you were able to have support, because it starts right after it ends right before fat

just like nonstop from Russia to fat.

And people really let people really have to be quick to you know, eating so hard because otherwise you will not get to eat. You really is this not exaggeration?

Anyway, so when I was luckily in the no mercy

and we said that whoever said that anomaly is here does not modify or do any man Malik Maliki position. He said in any position. Now many of us here might sleep and that is the position that they've chose. But that's not the authorized position in the matter. Let's get to lambson vacher via the touching the penis with his hands.

This also includes the female organs. It also includes the anus, according to the Sharpies and cranberries. It only includes the front, according to the lab. But according to the shaft razor honeyberries also includes the back touching the anus, and this is touching one's own horn someone

someone else's front or back. So he can barely remember this front or back. Yours, someone else's.

With loss without lust, just touching. So a woman changing her little child touching. Yes, it breaks the window.

But that is

him the Jaffa youngberry position that is not in the other positions

okay

so shafa somebody Yeah, yes the others are no. So, where did this come from like why do why do you why they disagree? We have to at least we have more than two hobbies we like to always make things simplify things, but simplifying things can sometimes

like give us the wrong impression that this is this isn't this is what the whole thing is about. There is no there is like more back and forth between the scholars. So, when you think that you have all the the argument in you know, that you have mastered the argument on both sides, you have not there is a little bit more to it. But basically the most the most featured

pieces of evidence in this debate are two hobbies one from lady called personal been to soft one and one from

her, like as a hobby or cookbooks from Episode One and one from a Scobie called Paul canali. Both of these have comfortable authenticity both the Hollies have been reported by you know all the sudden meatiness even imagined mmm and also reported.

But thank goodness

said that the Prophet sallallahu Sallam when he was asked about touching once

you know zacher he said that what what Alibaba to make our model atonement? Is it not? Is it isn't it just a piece of you are part of your flesh, which indicates that it does not break your will do because touching your arm will not break your windows. So isn't that just a piece of your part of you? Meaning that it does not nullify that will do the studies of puppet Nadi. And the hadith of bootstrap into someone the hadith of bootstrap into sufferance is what the prophet SAW Selim said men must like Alfredo whoever touches his penis let them make although in some other reports, men must suffer to hopefully avoid whoever touches the front, Corgan and product is the front Horrigan

orkut also mean the back organ as well. So, it is either front or back private partners whoever touches pays for her private parts that have make will do now how you reconcile between these two hobbies

Okay, you reconcile between these two hobbies by No.

So, basically it is a little bit more than this. So messy in some of the scholars said that the reconciliation is by

claim of aggregation claim of aggregation so the shafa is and the honeyberries said that the hadith of both Robin to self one comes after the hadith of ibn Ali are these boots Robin this one comes after the hadith of Edna Holly and they're approved for this is that top cut now they accepted Islam earlier much earlier than bootstrapping to support that claim or abrogation is somewhat hard but that's what the that's their their position that one of these came later than the other because the Islam of bootstrap and this one was after way after the Islam have acknowledged the HANA fees higher fees the higher fees you know they always examine these things with like a more critical eye.

So the higher fees even you know like maybe the point to the booster up into support is a woman so what business does she have to do with this like

so the you know what what why is it that boosted Aventis offline is the only one who's teaching us about touching you know,

the proper private parts particularly here Zachariah, who when the rest of the Sahaba male companions of the Prophet all sudden are not reporting this house.

But also the Hanafi is basically completely disregarded bodies and busted up and disappointed and invalidated and acted upon bodies of technology. So they said touching does not nullify the weather without our just doesn't. Now the magic is cited with Chavez and honeyberries if someone touched it intentionally with the palm of their hands and so on and was clear that this was intentional.

Thought, but another position was in the Maliki must have another position in the medical method which even if they may have chose is the make that reconciliation between the two are hobbies by saying that one hobbies applied to one scenario and another hobby is applied to a different scenario. So let's accept both our hobbies acceptable stress, hobbies and perhaps hobbies. And say that bootless hobbies about breaking the will do apply to the scenario when this touch is lost the full touch and hobbies pocket naturally applies to when this touch is not lost, full touch, and they said that when he when the Prophet said the topic of knowledge, why do I love a document isn't that

just a piece of you or parts of you? It is not just part of you if it is a lustful touch because it is not just like your arm. If it is a lustful touch, it is like your arm if it is a non lustful touch, it is like your arm. So when someone is like taking a shower or something and the touch of their private parts, it is just like touching their arm. There is nothing more to it when there is no last

push this in the back of your mind.

If nakodar has said that thing, regardless breaks though, but clarifying and disambiguation or extension.

Okay, the two of them lose or the one who will touch only the one who will touch only because the other one cannot be called that he touched.

Unless there is a scenario that are not going to they're ours. But keep it at

the one who's touching.

Next. Okay, lots of interactive and next is touching the opposite sex email. Allah said, when Thomas vastra to who owns Anisha if his skin touches the skin of a woman with lustful desire, okay, here the hunt buddies got into this lustful thing.

So if his skin touches the skin of a woman with lustful desire, Hunter must have a Serato Buster On this edition.

And I'm sorry if it is addressing the men the languages addressing them. But this is applicable both ways in the Hanbury method

to touch the opposite sex. So if the woman touches her husband or the husband touches his wife, with less than that is basically touching the opposite sex that it nullifies both ways, not just for the man also for the woman who touches her husband with lust.

Now

So, so basically,

that there is another position in the Hanbury method which is pretty strong gold. So and that is the position that the Tamia chose that dancing

women basically or men, the opposite sex does not break the widow period unless

people have you know this charges come out of their private organs, but just mere touching even lustful touching, does not period and they use the hubby's from eyeshadow 11 where she said can also lasagna could be Alibaba as well he from

the preface and sort of use the touch used to kiss I'm sorry, some of his wives and then pray without making model. And then it's a powerful hobbies because kissing your wife is you cannot really say that. Although some people can argue that the not every kisses lustful but it's kissing. So we

can it is it's also the fact that that this hadith tells us that kissing it does not nullify that will do and we have also the default of what allows libera the default of non liability. The default is that you will do is not nullified until you have evidence and you lie saying I will I must commend myself for you touched women refers to as in our best self, three in the in the corner and usually this word this this phrase or this expression refers to actual conjugal relations, not just the mere touching. So if you have this and you have the non liability as the default

Then it the burden of the proof is on who ever wants to say that touching women or men nullifies the widow. So the burden is on on them to, to prove it.

So anyway

and then there are other hobbies from Isaiah where she talks about how she touched the feet of the Prophet sallahu wa salam o Hamamatsu Mata for potty it

could have

been so bad that even mustard while my other lawn many houses have been abandoned and subtlety

to birds properties are becoming obsolete, or they can pick them up later on. And I've seen so when she touched that they had the feet of the prophets of Salaam when he was inside the master when she was looking for him in the dark.

And it does not say that he stopped his prayer. And he used to pray close to her. So every time he wanted to prostrate or he would sometimes pray close to her every time he wanted to prostrate, he would tap on the leg to pull her back because the room was not that wide. And

not not not just that the room was not that wide because the Prophet you know, like the nearness to it. He loved it. So you'd like to be near to her even when he prayed she she also liked hearing some of the prophets. So she would sit or recline near him when he is praying. So he would you know like to pull her neck so that he would have room to prostrate

anything anyway. So there are like, there there is some good amount of proofs that touching the opposite sex does not not a final to

push the back to their your mind what the developer gonna say

touching with last nullifies that will do it would not this is also you know, it would not be because less than general you know,

we talked about touching the private parts, why is touching the private parts, we said that you know, one good way of reconciliation between the two parties is to differentiate between worse than no loss. So, touching the private parts lost the touching of the private parts break the although then it does make some sense that was the full touching of the opposite sex will nullify that will do. So this position that was that is the authorized position in the Hanbury mantha

although the other one is not too weak either. It's also strong in the Motherland, but this position that is recorded here by perdana has strengthened validity to and if you want to remember that position, it is what is safe and it is it is what it is more pious, that touching in general does not nullify the word touching was lost when notified. So if someone kisses his wife or her husband, without loss, which is something that we should be doing to show affection and compassion.

If people do this to show affection and compassion, not lustful desire, which they need to be the winner after and then that does not nullify the world because you do not want to every like every sort of every time this happens

to repeat the will because it could deter people from being compassionate being affectionate, yes, to make this ambiguous,

okay. Only this ambiguity

makes the difference between

shaking hands is usually not a problem. The hero

in the Hanbury method in the Hanbury mother, because it is unlikely that you will shake hands with lost

it is other types of touching. I mean if you shook hands and

is less than touching certainly has to be intentional, because it would not be possible if it is not intention you know, not be lustful, if it was not intention. Okay.

The next point here is what read that one is learn what read the to understand this is number six.

Keep in mind that in the honeyberry methods have their eight, not seven. The eighth one is that a serial mayor, according to the authorized position in the Hanbury must have washing the dead

requires when you watch the dead you will need to make. So if you want to have this in your notes in the authorized Hanbury view, you will do as required after watching the dead washing the dead nullifies.

But number six is apostasy. And some of the scholars said,

Look, this is a matter of agreement. Well, if you commit your chiaramente will be invalidated here it will be invalidated. So, but some of the scholars said that this is not

this is not necessarily needed in this chapter because it's another fire Of course, it's another it's a heart attack, but it is a major in validator and major in validators. nullifier we'll do that as an hour.

Yes, you know, by the greater analogy, so if it nullifies your vote, it certainly modifies your will do, you don't even only need to make a Do you have to make rules to get back in ritual purity.

So apostasy can be added to the major in validators and harder to activate those who would require what

was ritual bath? What are the major in validators? This is higher than the fast this would be menstrual and postpartum bleeding, postpartum bleeding.

This will be intercourse

this would be ejaculation and according to the Hanafi madhhab, even the descent of the semen

this would be sorry, this would be apostasy.

These are called the major invalidate or so how does the LOC So anyway, apostasy is not just an invalid data mined and invalid data that requires will do apostasy and non badmouth is a major in validator that requires was upon re accepting Islam

now

Okay, so we

saw the red dot and then we would get into like a peculiar one in the hung buddy method, which is acknowledgement disorder. And he said

well, I could just Zoo Maria in 1711 human Eben Corona Santo Domingo de todo el mundo Humira, Ghana, Prada, NC telephoto.

Eating canons meet since the prophet SAW Selim was asked should we make will do after eating Donald Smith? He said yes make although after eating camels have eaten their meat, he was then asked should we make will do after eating glam he said if you want then you can make poodle and if you do not want to make more than them. So this hubbies is actually an authentic hadith reported by Bukhari and Muslim. And we do have a strong argument here against the three other because this is a peculiarity of the Hanafi method for the distinctive positions. Somebody You know, this is a peculiarly peculiarity of the compelling melta distinctive positions on PKD you know of the mouth hub, because

the hafeez medicals and sapphires do not take this position. They think that this is abrogated, this was

during the time when it when that Sahaba made will do it from everything that was touched by fire, meaning meet, whenever the eight meet, you know,

anything that's cooked with fire here means meat does not mean vegetables.

And will not remember set from now does not apply to cooking spinach. It will don't remember certainly never applies to meet that was cook. So,

when

they say that this was in the beginning, but the Hardys in the Hadith itself, the prophet was asked about lamb and he said if you want you could make a dog from after he loves me. And if you do not want, you do not need so he made the distinction between lamb and camels meat. Therefore, the honeyberries have a strong

argument here that gamma eating camels meat does break your window because of the likelihood disambiguation

is very close to the question.

Yeah,

a lot of scholars, you know to make most of before going to sleep process them said yes,

you can sleep.

But a lot of scholars say it's not mandatory to do that. It's not simple if you want to sleep with my mom, and

so it's very close to the same way he was asked about eating Campbell's laughter when he said yes to do similar to what he said yesterday.

But the problem here is, when he was asked about lamb He said, If you want Mikado if you don't, don't want to, but when he was asked about camels, he just gave one answer.

What is the distinction then between camel, camels meat and meat and lamb? If there is,

the homies is very strong. It's just like very strong. camels means you know, guys, it comes me that does not apply to anything but camels flesh By the way, so it does not apply to any part of the camel but flesh. The muscles that flesh the actual meat does not apply to Kevin's intestines, liver, spleen, he could have milk certainly does not apply to the soup cabinet the soup of the meat supplier, just candles flesh.

Then in our Kodama Ramallah said commentaire, Corrado said Kevin hardest.

Coleman aumentare Tara, Tara Masek, Catherine has one who is certain of having had ritual purity but in doubt as to whether he had a goal a cause for ritual impurity afterwards, out there Karen had a second Kapha Tara

and one who is certain of having had a reason for ritual impurity, but in doubt, as to whether he had he made ablution afterwards for modernity Academy in Houma, he must follow what he is certain of. So, if you are in doubt, go back to the last point of certainty.

Last point of certainty and stop there,

cast the doubt remove the doubt and go back to the last point of certainty. So in the last point of certainty, you had men impure ritually impure, you are utterly impure until you develop another certainty that will erase the first certainty and if the last point of certainty were ritually pure, you are ritually pure, until you have until you have certainty that you broke your purity. Now, this was not mentioned in one day and it is important to mention, what do you need to do for in the Hanbury method.

This was not mentioned in the book is The fourth thing that you want to write this down in your notes. So what do you need to look for in the Hanbury myth, you need to go for a salah and basically that is praying

whether this is the funeral prior, whether the even the prostrations or forget prostrations of recitation and gratitude

in the Hanbury method, you need to do for all of that any sort of anything that is that has a resemblance, the prayer, even prostration of recitation and prostration of gratitude says that it did our was that that a shock. Okay, so anything that has a resemblance to pray even a piece of it to do that you need to do further. So our Salah at Pawan would be number two

at office number two you need to do for a top off

and that is the position of the Americans in surveys as well. And then you need to do for mass

you need to do for touching the most touching the most hot, can you carry the Muslim? Certainly that is the most heavily with your bare hands, not with gloves. Not if the most half has a case that can be separated from it. Not the cover that is not separated from it. But if you have a case for the most harm that can be separated from it, then you can carry the most half molded in your hand because you're holding the case. Not the most half.

Okay, so these are

these are controversial.

All of this is controversial. What is

what

What is agreed upon by consensus that you need to do for by consensus? These your Salah, that is your regular Saba, Farber nefler, prayers, your solid Salah.

But but the, the disagreement with the funeral prayer is, you know how weaker this agreement that this agreement was the prostration of gratitude and prostration you know, some people argue that nothing can be called Salah

until it is one rock or more that said do this not in sama. Anyway, I am not going to get into much

these details, but remember that

in the hanbali position, three things

there are three things for which you need to have although that is a lot of work and touching the Korean putting the most has the product.

Now touching a book of Pepsi is not touching the most because a book of Pepsi is not the most

but they will always say you know, is this better? It is always better to

know.

And if Yeah, hi personally, this is you're going to push it back right after right after I say I personally don't believe that touching the most half he will need to have to touch the most.

And the reason why this isn't usually my answer is that it could deter many people from actually reading the Quran and because if every time they want to read the Quran, they have to make withdrawal First, it could deter them from reaching out to their most common reading.

And the proof that touching the most half requires or do is it can testable proof we have to have you know to Atlantis with our own the eye on the Hadith I'm sorry, and the Prophet sallallahu Sallam statement what Allah Subhanallah time

but but the Hadith is controversial. No one will touch the Quranic said someone who was fired, who could be understood to mean

believer, a believer in that sense because a believer is always thought as the prophets are sometimes said to Overlay and align us with our own that is in the Quran. This by the way, according to the very the vast majority of the manifest your own means the preserve a tablet, not the pariah. It refers to the preserve a tablet not been touched except by a motor neurone the purified which is in reference to the angels.

But it's a controversial issue. The authorized position of the Hanbury method is that you don't touch the brain. Some of the advocates that we want to mention here because we have five minutes some of the other things that we want to mention that are usually mentioned in here when they when they come about medicine most half or touching the Quran and needing to have to do would be the advocates of handling the poor. So it is haram in the Ambani madhhab to use the poor as a must have as a pillow.

Some people may like do that you know like if they have like a few mazahub they put them and it is haram to use the most half as a pillow. It is harm to reclining on the most hot

it is haram certainly to throw it on the ground.

It is haram to write it with anything that is nudges that is impure. Or take exposure to anything that is nudges.

It is macro to stretch your feet out in the direction of the most off it is macro to give your back to the most half like to put the Muslim behind your back to sit and put the Muslim behind your back macro not Hara.

So we set her arm to throw it to recline on it to use it as a pedal to write it with nudges or to write

to expose it to rajasa macro to give your back to it makrooh to stretch your feet out in its direction makrooh to put it on the ground without

purpose

or in a way that may or may show disrespect. It is not my crew to put it in the underground. If you're reading from it and you're sitting anyhow he may be preferable to put it on something you know

And on top of sameena, not on the ground. But if you're sitting now and reading, and you have almost half on the ground in front of you, particularly if it is a large most of that is fine. Although it is preferable to put, put something underneath it, but that would be fine. But it would not be fine. It would be certainly McGrew. If you just leave it there on the ground, he's not sitting in front of it, you're not reciting there is no purpose for you to leave it on the ground, that you don't leave it on the ground, you put it on the shelf,

because that hit is makrooh.

To the ornamentation of the most half is anyway, we're from Ruth O'Hara. And they mentioned here as well, the ornamentation of the massage and they consider it to be macro because ornamentation to z in that layer and the Z

decoration

the massage because of the destruction that it causes to them suddenly saying that that the decoration of the massage is macro because of the destruction it's caused to the muscle lean. Some people may argue that

you could make dip in the back because it does not distract them something but there are those general discouraging statements from the purposes other than from the Sahaba about the prophet and massage in general, the decoration of massage in general. So it is really preferable that you don't have decorations, except you know, beautification is different from decoration from zarafa zakharova ornamentation is different from beautification. So if you have a mustard, you see the miaa mustard, Vanessa North Norco, this is a beautiful mustard. You know it's very simple. Have you guys been to Okay, so nice mustard is very simple and it is it has some beauty, but when you walk into it, it

doesn't start with you. It's like it is it's not overstated. It's architects could usually do this and that will be more spiritual he can do serve and all of them.

That's a big vision

of this macro.

In some may say haram particularly when it comes to the crime but but it is macro.

Is macro.

Particularly if you have them in the front the camera increases because now we are distracting them on Sunday. Particularly if you have them at the level of eyesight the karate increases. really distracting them somebody could have probably other structural biologists kind of go hungry Shadowlands perfectly