Jehovahs Witness Visits

Ahmed Deedat


Channel: Ahmed Deedat

File Size: 52.93MB

Share Page


AI: Summary © The conversation discusses the importance of finding the right person to translate words or phrases, and the history and context of the Bible. It emphasizes the use of "Grap commodity," in the Bible, and the importance of listening to media's use of symbols to convey their message. The history and context of the Bible are also discussed, including confusion surrounding "sted fire" and " Jesus keeps" in the Bible, and Jeunie's "has a foot note" and "has a foot note." The importance of language and respect for one's language is emphasized.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00--> 00:00:00


00:00:01--> 00:00:02

sit down my son.

00:00:04--> 00:00:06

When I forget the first time I asked him

00:00:08--> 00:00:17

and I think you said neither. Then I asked you I just try now or something like that, but I forgot what he actually said. Yes.

00:00:23--> 00:00:29

Sister languages here hear exactly one of the 11 languages. Also one of them. Yeah. Is

00:00:31--> 00:00:32


00:00:33--> 00:00:34

the same language? No.

00:00:36--> 00:00:37

There is difference between.

00:00:38--> 00:00:41

And when I speak to despises Zulu, they seem to enjoy.

00:00:47--> 00:00:51

Three and a half page letter is duly duly received.

00:00:52--> 00:00:53


00:00:54--> 00:00:56

something that intrigued me

00:00:57--> 00:01:06

was the statement of yours that was actually helped by the Holy Spirit directly to us. To write you this letter was

00:01:09--> 00:01:17

moved by the Holy Spirit was inspired by the Holy Spirit to help the police be

00:01:19--> 00:01:20


00:01:22--> 00:01:23

You would say we're inspired

00:01:26--> 00:01:28

to help you follow Jesus Christ.

00:01:31--> 00:01:32


00:01:33--> 00:01:35

help is moved.

00:01:37--> 00:01:40

You inspired? Or you said you were not inspired? You're

00:01:41--> 00:01:43

not inspired? Because

00:01:45--> 00:01:47

he said he will help us in you.

00:01:49--> 00:01:51

Bible that the Bible says

00:01:53--> 00:01:55

that you are inspired by the Holy Spirit. No,

00:01:57--> 00:02:03

no, no. The word. The synonym for that. You see the Holy Bible, the King James Version.

00:02:05--> 00:02:06

You said the Holy Spirit.

00:02:08--> 00:02:10

The King James only said the Holy Ghost.

00:02:12--> 00:02:14

But you choose the word Holy Spirit.

00:02:16--> 00:02:18

Because you were held to say that

00:02:21--> 00:02:22

you could have said Holy Ghost.

00:02:24--> 00:02:41

But you know you chose Holy Spirit is for a second deliberately. It went through your mind, not Holy Ghost. Was is a synonymous term in the King James Version. That was there it says the Holy Ghost ghost. But now in your Bible, it says the Holy Spirit.

00:02:43--> 00:02:46

And you can even refer to more invasions of the Bible.

00:02:52--> 00:02:55

So if I use the word Holocaust, you won't be offended.

00:02:56--> 00:02:58

You can be offended, I think

00:03:01--> 00:03:13

mean the minimum minimum wage. Because the Bible for the years, but 1000 years all the Bible's that the word precose is modern construction, you say they use the Holy Spirit.

00:03:15--> 00:03:19

So if that Bible, if I had the kingdom

00:03:20--> 00:03:22

to the Holy Ghost came

00:03:24--> 00:03:25

and conceived Merry

00:03:26--> 00:03:29

Christmas, you can't have any objection to that.

00:03:30--> 00:03:32

I don't accept the word Holocaust. But now

00:03:35--> 00:03:39

that the Bible was originally written in the New Testament,

00:03:40--> 00:03:42

in Greek, right, okay.

00:03:44--> 00:03:46

And the meaning of the word for for spirit in Greek release.

00:03:48--> 00:03:56

Right, right, right. Now, there is no there is no word for ghost in Greek that you know.

00:03:58--> 00:04:02

So, this word numa can be used for spirit as well as post.

00:04:04--> 00:04:19

See, there is no separate word for these two things in Greek, just having that you know, okay, there are no separate the word is numa for Spiritist numa for most is numa. Now, let me say this we

00:04:20--> 00:04:21

know versions like

00:04:22--> 00:04:22


00:04:25--> 00:04:26

versions, like the King James Version.

00:04:29--> 00:04:29

I don't think

00:04:30--> 00:04:39

you know, they have some Trinitarian inclinations, you know, because, obviously the brain that are transmitted by the Trinitarian, right.

00:04:41--> 00:04:47

So now they usually use the word Holocaust to support the doctrine of the Trinity.

00:04:49--> 00:04:53

Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe the reason because I have one of the

00:04:59--> 00:04:59


00:05:01--> 00:05:10

Wilson says it notations like the King James Version, already true rendering of the original Greek text.

00:05:13--> 00:05:20

mean Wilson alone, even other scholars believe it, because I don't think there's quite I mean, there's color sway.

00:05:22--> 00:05:25

You know, it was sponsored by King James himself. Right? Right, right, right.

00:05:26--> 00:05:28

Right. They accept Trinity.

00:05:31--> 00:05:34

So whatever suited them, they would lean that language

00:05:37--> 00:05:41

in the King James who suffer that Trinity doctrine like,

00:05:42--> 00:05:42


00:05:45--> 00:05:51

Now you offer me here, that I can give you a free home Bible study this right now you are hurt

00:05:53--> 00:05:54

by the Holy Spirit.

00:05:55--> 00:06:02

You help to write that I can give you a free home Bible study this will help to lead by the Holy Spirit.

00:06:05--> 00:06:06

You know, that I live in? Well.

00:06:09--> 00:06:11

I know. So you're addressing that.

00:06:15--> 00:06:22

You know, I live in Berlin. Now you can come to my house every week to give me a study in Holy Bible.

00:06:24--> 00:06:25

But I can arrange but now

00:06:28--> 00:06:30

I can give you you.

00:06:32--> 00:06:34

I can give you a free home Bible study.

00:06:37--> 00:06:39

Now, can you give me a free home Bible study?

00:06:41--> 00:06:41


00:06:42--> 00:06:44

you can just learn from

00:06:46--> 00:06:48

sin industry is an industry.

00:06:49--> 00:06:56

You know, you wanted two weeks? You want to see me on the 30th? Let me explain.

00:06:58--> 00:07:04

to you for me for the first time. Isn't that sort of sometimes when you said you

00:07:10--> 00:07:11

right, is it we didn't

00:07:14--> 00:07:15

even I'm free to come

00:07:16--> 00:07:23

in I did phone. As I said, you as I told you on Tuesday, I couldn't get through where they said you're very busy.

00:07:26--> 00:07:27

You phoned me again on Tuesday.

00:07:28--> 00:07:37

I said can I come? Can I come on? On the 20th of November, correct? Why? Why did I say sir? Yes, as I said, Well,

00:07:40--> 00:07:47

I mean, because of my tie shaders. Because of my taste sugar is a student at

00:07:48--> 00:07:48

the University

00:07:50--> 00:07:51

to get more time to

00:07:52--> 00:07:54

sit down and have a chat

00:07:57--> 00:07:59

to learn more about your religion,

00:08:02--> 00:08:03

how will you be able to come to

00:08:04--> 00:08:11

to give me a course in Bible study, to know when you are writing you did not I will see

00:08:15--> 00:08:17

you specially went out of your way to write

00:08:19--> 00:08:22

bargaining for is because I believe that

00:08:24--> 00:08:26

taking it personally,

00:08:27--> 00:08:28

but others can do it.

00:08:30--> 00:08:32

What guarantees guarantee Have you got

00:08:33--> 00:08:36

that because they there is a local communication?

00:08:40--> 00:08:41

I can

00:08:46--> 00:08:46

say here

00:08:48--> 00:08:49

is because we

00:08:52--> 00:08:54

have this study.

00:08:58--> 00:09:00

You can live forever in paradise on earth. Yes.

00:09:03--> 00:09:05

Yes, I think I've seen

00:09:06--> 00:09:07

my library.

00:09:08--> 00:09:10

The Bible is authentic and true.

00:09:13--> 00:09:32

The word authentic it means undisputed origin or authorship. That's the concise dictionary. I just had a look at it just now. What is authentic? I mean, I have at the back of my mind. I thought I know the word so No, no. Let me make doubly sure. It says of undisputed origin or authorship. That's what

00:09:35--> 00:09:35

now you have a Bible.

00:09:37--> 00:09:37


00:09:45--> 00:09:50

This is this is the same as Jehovah's Witness translation.

00:09:52--> 00:09:54

Now, do you consider this

00:09:55--> 00:09:58

whole Bible as inspired Word of God? Yes.

00:09:59--> 00:09:59

I believe

00:10:00--> 00:10:07

inspired Word of God, you believe that I believe this translation? There is the translation. Yes.

00:10:08--> 00:10:11

You will exist with the inspired Word of God. Yes.

00:10:13--> 00:10:16

The Christian scholars are telling me, I'd like you to correct me.

00:10:18--> 00:10:29

It says the original writings of the of the New Testament were inspired the original writings of the New Testament. They did way, way.

00:10:30--> 00:10:30


00:10:33--> 00:10:46

They were inspired, were inspired. Why IE, past tense, he said the scholars, scholars, Christian scholars, Christian scholars have the highest eminence, okay? They say

00:10:47--> 00:10:48

that the original writings

00:10:50--> 00:10:57

of the New Testament were inspired with the waves, but it doesn't mean that this is inspired. Okay.

00:10:58--> 00:11:03

So the way inspired is not is inspired the winds by wisdom.

00:11:05--> 00:11:10

It says no translation of the sacred writings into another language,

00:11:11--> 00:11:14

except by the original writers is inspired.

00:11:16--> 00:11:23

To make a note of that, no translation of the sacred writings of Matthew, Mark, Luke and john, for example.

00:11:25--> 00:11:28

If they were the original authors, they were inspired.

00:11:29--> 00:11:31

No translation

00:11:32--> 00:11:33

into another language,

00:11:35--> 00:11:36

except by the original writers

00:11:39--> 00:11:40

is inspired.

00:11:41--> 00:11:41

We accept that.

00:11:42--> 00:11:48

No, that means no translation. Except the majority of writers the original writer method will translate this

00:11:49--> 00:11:52

method might have been looped in Peter didn't

00:11:53--> 00:11:58

none of them had a hand in translating this book. So

00:11:59--> 00:12:03

your scholars say that they're not inspired. Yeah, but no.

00:12:05--> 00:12:10

You can just making a reference to me was Colorado's

00:12:11--> 00:12:12

Jehovah's Witness calls.

00:12:14--> 00:12:18

You as witnesses, you don't accept any Tom Dick and Harry any juicy

00:12:19--> 00:12:20

Thank you jovis witness

00:12:21--> 00:12:22

to me too.

00:12:26--> 00:12:28

See, if I give you a book this book here

00:12:29--> 00:12:31

and in the preface, they tell me that

00:12:33--> 00:12:39

in the preface of the tournament that will be accepted or not in the prefix book Yes. Okay. We accept it.

00:12:41--> 00:12:47

Because if you accept this book has inspired Word of God and the people who did this job if they tell you

00:12:48--> 00:12:51

that any translation into another language

00:12:52--> 00:12:59

with a Zulu, casa, English, Afrikaans any language any of these, this is not inspired.

00:13:01--> 00:13:02

accept that.

00:13:05--> 00:13:08

But it says okay, could you give me this?

00:13:10--> 00:13:10


00:13:13--> 00:13:17

this something from the translators of the of this patient?

00:13:19--> 00:13:23

Okay, somewhat some of the things they say that the translators of this work,

00:13:25--> 00:13:38

allow the divine of the Holy Scriptures field to achieve a special responsibility to transmit his thoughts and declarations as accurately as possible, as accurately as possible, I suppose.

00:13:40--> 00:13:54

They also feel a responsibility to our decision readers, would you call it a poet translation of the inspired rate of the Most High Court for their everlasting salvation? So no talking about the inspired Word of God, not that this is inspired.

00:13:55--> 00:13:59

Again, okay, say what you read what you read,

00:14:00--> 00:14:06

what you did there, I understood from your reading, that this is based on the inspired Word of God, okay.

00:14:09--> 00:14:28

Do you also feel a responsibility to our decision readers, to what to words, to what decision readers what readers, they're searching for searching these readers who deplete who depend upon a translation.

00:14:30--> 00:14:30

You see

00:14:32--> 00:14:36

a translation of the Most High Court for the everlasting salvation.

00:14:38--> 00:14:39

He was the original.

00:14:53--> 00:15:00

They also feel a responsibility toward the searching readers who depend upon a transcript

00:15:00--> 00:15:08

of the inspired Word of the Most High God, upon a translation of the inspired Word, the Most High God for their everlasting salvation.

00:15:10--> 00:15:18

They depend upon a translation of the inspired Word of God the translation is not inspired. Okay, you can just as inspired, yeah, but no,

00:15:19--> 00:15:21

continue to read. It is

00:15:23--> 00:15:30

inspired. Okay even translation can give salvation can help other people to get salvation.

00:15:31--> 00:15:32

But it's not inspired,

00:15:34--> 00:15:44

inspired Word of God. God makes you two moves you Matthew, Mark, Luke and john, write a certain word. For example. Suppose they wrote the word Holy Ghost.

00:15:45--> 00:15:49

Ghost in Greek, you have no right to translate that.

00:15:51--> 00:16:06

Matthew was dictated to inspired breathed into moved by the Holy Spirit to select write down the Holy Ghost that may be conceived by the Holy Ghost if there was a word ghost in Greek,

00:16:07--> 00:16:08

and it could have a synonym.

00:16:10--> 00:16:15

Now, if Matthew wrote ghost, you have no right to say spirit. Thank you.

00:16:17--> 00:16:20

I'm sorry for asking you this question. But I think I have to.

00:16:24--> 00:16:25

Do you recall that

00:16:26--> 00:16:28

section of the Quran is inspired?

00:16:29--> 00:16:36

Oh, yes, no, not the translation. But the translation. The translation is never inspired. never

00:16:37--> 00:16:55

see the actual Quran the Arabic Quran is inspired by this. But the translation is not you are a translator, I'm a translator. Do you believe that African reader English reader can gain salvation by reading the English court? Yes, yes. Yes.

00:16:57--> 00:16:57


00:16:59--> 00:17:01

If you if you if you see something that

00:17:02--> 00:17:04

is this inspired Word of God,

00:17:06--> 00:17:07

then when I have a look at it,

00:17:09--> 00:17:18

man, it can have shades of meanings. This word here, which is not in the original Arabic, the original Arabic says this

00:17:19--> 00:17:26

this is very rough. But if you are particular, somebody else uses a different term.

00:17:27--> 00:17:33

So it says no, no, that term is preferable to this like in your case, it is preferable to the word ghost.

00:17:35--> 00:17:37

So but you can say now

00:17:39--> 00:17:56

this is inspired or that is inspired because the Christian, Orthodox Christian, they say that the King James version is inspired. The Roman Catholics say the new version is inspired by all these modern translations, they all say they're inspired. But your scholars they say

00:17:57--> 00:18:12

that no translation whatsoever, which I agree by, but I still have to reference from human who's Colorado significant just kept giving me eternity to say so something of that nature

00:18:26--> 00:18:26


00:18:28--> 00:18:31

the Christian Christians who stand by

00:18:33--> 00:18:34

this nation

00:18:36--> 00:18:40

who is the author of this, the author, these are the translators.

00:18:41--> 00:18:43

Java's witnesses are Roman Catholics.

00:18:45--> 00:18:46

They're Jehovah's Witnesses.

00:18:47--> 00:18:48

So now open it.

00:18:50--> 00:18:51

And read start reading the foreword.

00:18:56--> 00:18:57

When you underlined

00:19:01--> 00:19:10

earlier writings of the Christian Greek scriptures, commonly called the New Testament, which is, by the way in Spanish,

00:19:12--> 00:19:21

no translation of this sacred writings into another language, except that the original writers is inspired. First up

00:19:26--> 00:19:29

in cooking, the inspired originals by

00:19:31--> 00:19:40

the element of human frailty entered in right. And so none of the 1000s of copies extend to the individual language.

00:19:41--> 00:19:44

Right? None of them this is not one

00:19:46--> 00:19:49

of those that are original manuscripts.

00:19:50--> 00:19:56

The so called original manuscripts, none of them are perfect duplicates. And you have 24,000 of them.

00:19:58--> 00:19:59

So the 24,000

00:20:01--> 00:20:03

Okay, so which of them is inspired?

00:20:05--> 00:20:06

He says none of them

00:20:09--> 00:20:10

agree with that statement.

00:20:11--> 00:20:15

We agree with that statement that none of them are inspired.

00:20:16--> 00:20:22

So, from an inspired writing, you make a translation that is still makes it worse.

00:20:23--> 00:20:25

Because the Gospel of St. Matthews, now

00:20:28--> 00:20:28


00:20:30--> 00:20:32

studious tends

00:20:33--> 00:20:34

to be good

00:20:35--> 00:20:40

at translation in DC reversed and this one is revised

00:20:42--> 00:20:45

in 1950, the guys who the committee that was there

00:20:46--> 00:20:48

were the inspector, right? That

00:20:49--> 00:20:52

were the inspector at that. I mean, the translators themselves

00:20:56--> 00:20:56


00:20:57--> 00:21:00

you were moved by the Holy Spirit to write this letter.

00:21:02--> 00:21:04

You were helped by the Holy Spirit.

00:21:05--> 00:21:12

Those translators of yours from Greek into English, they were not helped by the Holy Spirit,

00:21:13--> 00:21:13


00:21:16--> 00:21:17

can explain

00:21:21--> 00:21:22

Can you quickly can you allow me to

00:21:24--> 00:21:24

use the

00:21:26--> 00:21:27

Bible he

00:21:30--> 00:21:31

can you even use this

00:21:45--> 00:21:45


00:21:50--> 00:21:52

but you say you helped

00:21:54--> 00:21:56

in the whole letter, or in portions of the letter?

00:21:58--> 00:22:06

Will you help in writing the whole letter or only extracts from that letter? I mean, the whole letter is such

00:22:07--> 00:22:11

a tool with the help of the Holy Spirit to give a witness to you

00:22:14--> 00:22:18

know plays a role. Actually, you know, what is actually

00:22:20--> 00:22:21

actually helped.

00:22:23--> 00:22:24


00:22:26--> 00:22:39

what it means is you actually helped me, the Holy Spirit was guiding you to code to code that reference Acts, chapter one, verse eight is the Holy Spirit helped you,

00:22:40--> 00:22:45

the Holy Spirit help you I am prepared to give you a Bible Study Course.

00:22:47--> 00:22:48

In the Holy Spirit.

00:22:50--> 00:23:00

So from the word start, from the word go, the whole letter or a portion of the Holy Spirit is helping you is it now I read this to Mr. deedat.

00:23:02--> 00:23:03

Mr. deedat?

00:23:04--> 00:23:04


00:23:07--> 00:23:12

The Holy Spirit help you to decide what you are writing or you did it on your own.

00:23:16--> 00:23:18

Okay, I said the Holy Spirit helped you

00:23:20--> 00:23:20


00:23:21--> 00:23:25

I didn't say the Holy Spirit inspired me

00:23:26--> 00:23:29

what is inspired? What is inspired?

00:23:35--> 00:23:37

What is inspired Okay, now you come with a

00:23:38--> 00:23:42

condition x equals Okay, I mean dictionary.

00:23:44--> 00:23:45

Point, let me make my point.

00:23:47--> 00:23:50

misunderstandings. Okay, let me try and

00:23:54--> 00:23:57

let you know that there are different dictionaries and we can explain the way

00:23:59--> 00:24:01

these people have no motives in writing what

00:24:03--> 00:24:14

makes up the dictionary. He's got no ulterior motives, according to his understanding, like authentic the guy gave you just answers, that of undisputed authorship.

00:24:16--> 00:24:28

So, similar enough, Messina, we agree that look, this guy had an automotive service and now this is what it means authentic means this. So you agree. I agree. Everybody agrees in a court of law.

00:24:29--> 00:24:46

This is what actually happens. If you have a dispute about the meaning is and let's go to the dictionary, when you said that, there could be other words as a dammit all this dictionary here Oxford Dictionary Collins dictionary. Those people had nothing in mind regarding our dispute,

00:24:47--> 00:24:49

when they put down those wordings,

00:24:50--> 00:24:55

so that you have to accept as an objective explanation inspired

00:25:00--> 00:25:11

stimulating of beneficial effect upon was the first word she had said is stimulating toto to exert Yes, a stimulating

00:25:12--> 00:25:15

or beneficial effect upon Can you

00:25:17--> 00:25:19

animate or invigorate

00:25:21--> 00:25:24

any animate any material it

00:25:25--> 00:25:36

continues to arouse with a particular emotion or to a particular action or to stay, to prompt or to instigate,

00:25:38--> 00:25:39

instigate, this helps

00:25:40--> 00:25:41

give rise

00:25:43--> 00:25:44

to instigate

00:25:47--> 00:25:52

influence, inspiration, these are the meanings of the word inspired.

00:25:53--> 00:26:00

So, now, if you say that this book is inspired your author's colors in 1900 50 was it 50

00:26:02--> 00:26:13

unless they change your mind, they made a statement and you seem very logical that unless done by the the original author, let's say that you wrote it in Hebrew

00:26:15--> 00:26:15


00:26:17--> 00:26:18

an intermediate a

00:26:19--> 00:26:25

kind of discussion because, as you know it, I wrote this letter,

00:26:26--> 00:26:27


00:26:29--> 00:26:41

language, but with the help of the holy spirit man, time it is the Holy Spirit helps you can they be difficult in language can help you with language, that look you're using the wrong word.

00:26:42--> 00:26:47

It can help you learn how does it help you? How did the Holy Spirit help you in writing that letter?

00:26:51--> 00:26:53

The Holy Spirit help you if not with the language

00:26:56--> 00:26:57

How did you

00:26:59--> 00:27:00


00:27:01--> 00:27:07

how did it help you in giving witness? This is all that you know, Acts chapter one verse eight you knew by heart

00:27:08--> 00:27:09

you know that

00:27:10--> 00:27:30

you know that was so how did the Holy Spirit help you? Right That was okay spirit helped me to to recall. How did you do that? How did he do that to you? Did it whisper it in your ears? The Holy Spirit is now you know at chapter one verse eight. Peters

00:27:31--> 00:28:05

it is how are you recording something you learn something? How are you recording it is then the human mind the human computer gets a pleasure the answers so that we believe that the Holy Spirit is able to call back to our memory to remind us of what we studied or what Christ Jesus told us. Only that it also helps you to your frame your thoughts? Because they know how you address this man. How do you address a person we define personality? your personality, your personality by the Holy Spirit now, how did it help you? Then the Holy Spirit tells you

00:28:07--> 00:28:14

to address this grandfather of yours as well as your grandfather. He agree. I'm 75 years old.

00:28:16--> 00:28:18

I think the zoodles Hello Veronica.

00:28:21--> 00:28:22

respectful elders

00:28:23--> 00:28:24

also have that

00:28:25--> 00:28:26

you have respect for your elders.

00:28:28--> 00:28:32

So a 75 year old man your grandfather, you address him as

00:28:35--> 00:28:39

is that have you addressed your father's your grandfather's by his first name?

00:28:41--> 00:28:42

In English, do you do that?

00:28:45--> 00:28:49

Do you address an old man your grandfather? As like you know your boyfriend?

00:28:50--> 00:28:50

yet? Because?

00:28:52--> 00:29:02

Because Did you know me? Okay. Did you know who you were addressing? You know, that you're addressing him? And that's why that's why twice as long as your father.

00:29:03--> 00:29:07

Mr. tttt. So now, in other words, you're not helped by the Holy Spirit

00:29:10--> 00:29:14

that you have your own presumptuousness contemptuously you wrote,

00:29:16--> 00:29:29

which is not called for it is uncalled for in English. If you don't address a person if you're unknown person to you, by his first name, and without saying, Mister, you don't talk to him like that. But the Holy Spirit didn't help you.

00:29:32--> 00:29:36

that's beside the point. Now let's come to the plastics. You see the dispute between us.

00:29:38--> 00:29:41

Between the Muslim and the Christian? Are these two books,

00:29:42--> 00:29:43

the Quran and the Bible?

00:29:45--> 00:29:47

The Christian says that the Bible is God's word.

00:29:48--> 00:29:50

Muslim says the Quran is God's word.

00:29:52--> 00:29:57

The Christian says that the Quran is not the word of God. It Christian says

00:30:01--> 00:30:03

The Muslim says your Bible is not the word of God

00:30:04--> 00:30:06

is a conflict.

00:30:08--> 00:30:08


00:30:10--> 00:30:11

listen first I'm talking, okay?

00:30:13--> 00:30:16

So, you say your this,

00:30:17--> 00:30:21

I say minus, you say yours is not as smart. Okay?

00:30:23--> 00:30:24

This is me a disputation.

00:30:31--> 00:30:34

So, really disputing,

00:30:35--> 00:30:36

let's be disputation

00:30:38--> 00:30:39

as false

00:30:40--> 00:30:43

is false. If you see Mr. D that you're gonna go to hell.

00:30:45--> 00:31:09

The Christians, they say that, because we haven't got a Christ. But I think I should get your point is that he may ask the the Muslims, they don't believe that is devoid of, quote, a translation or learners, the whole Bible, this is whatever this man is telling us nothing about no translation whatsoever, then in another language up to the translation

00:31:12--> 00:31:17

of this is not the word of God. Because you're telling us at the latest,

00:31:18--> 00:31:21

the latest latest magazine

00:31:22--> 00:31:23

telling us the same thing

00:31:25--> 00:31:28

as a Jehovah's Witness magazine, this is not 1950.

00:31:31--> 00:31:32

us here.

00:31:36--> 00:31:43

To understand remember that the manuscript of the Christian Greek scriptures that we possess today are not the originals.

00:31:44--> 00:31:45

So they are not inspired.

00:31:47--> 00:31:54

They are not the originals. The Originals, which you call the so called originals are not autonomous. So they're not inspired.

00:31:57--> 00:32:02

So you're depending now upon an inspired word, to prove this to be the inspired Word of God.

00:32:04--> 00:32:08

This is not 1950 This is 19 you know what it is?

00:32:10--> 00:32:10


00:32:15--> 00:32:18

1984 1984 84.

00:32:20--> 00:32:22

So now in 84, they tell us the same thing.

00:32:24--> 00:32:31

Most translations, even when they include God's name in the Hebrew Scripture, omitted from the Christian Greek scripture, the New Testament.

00:32:33--> 00:32:36

So even the Word of God is taken out of the so called originals.

00:32:37--> 00:32:45

There is not a single out of the 24,000 that the Christian world is boasting not one has the word Jehovah in the 27 books.

00:32:46--> 00:32:50

Okay, so how can that be an inspired Word of God?

00:32:51--> 00:32:58

If God's own name is eliminated from the work how can they be inspired, inspired by who by the devil?

00:32:59--> 00:33:08

If God Himself My name is Matthew that if you take this name out, okay, it hurts me.

00:33:10--> 00:33:11


00:33:13--> 00:33:13

on me.

00:33:20--> 00:33:34

Out of the 27 books of the New Testament, there's 27 books not hidden does not occur even once. The word God does not occur once in 27 books in the originals that so called original manuscripts. So how can that be the Word of God?

00:33:36--> 00:33:46

Let's not go to that. Let's Let's see. Let me let me let me finish this. So I said we were just really disputing

00:33:47--> 00:33:52

as yours is not us a mine is not yours. I'm gonna go to hell as

00:33:55--> 00:34:04

you say, sir. This is commonality of the Christian world. They are telling us that we're gonna go to hell, because who died for our sins? guys that for years.

00:34:10--> 00:34:12

So guys, that salvation.

00:34:13--> 00:34:15

Nobody died for my sins.

00:34:16--> 00:34:17

So I have no salvation.

00:34:18--> 00:34:28

That's why you want to save us. Every Christian is out to save us. See Jehovah's Witnesses. This is how do you see nobody died for your sins?

00:34:29--> 00:34:32

That's what's our teaching is nobody died for our sins.

00:34:35--> 00:34:53

Nobody died for our sins, okay. That's our belief. So he said, Now, he said, you're gonna go to hell. He said, you're gonna go to hell. If you believe in such a place. The Orthodox Christians do. They believe that there is such a place as hell. And we're going to go there. You'll see that there is a paste code in all the people.

00:34:56--> 00:34:56


00:34:58--> 00:34:59

the Christian said that we are left in there.

00:35:00--> 00:35:06

Because we don't believe in Christ as, as the Son of God that He died for our sins, so we have nobody to redeem us.

00:35:08--> 00:35:09

This is me disputation.

00:35:11--> 00:35:14

When I tell you that the Bible is not the word of God,

00:35:15--> 00:35:17

I will tell you why.

00:35:19--> 00:35:39

Let me give you a parable. You see Jesus Christ in the New Testament, that he ever spoke in parables with ever spoken parable, the New Testament, yes, Jesus ever spoke in parables, the prodigal son, the virgins, and the return of the soul. So all this

00:35:40--> 00:35:46

is trying to explain things to therapists. So let me emulate him give you a parable.

00:35:48--> 00:35:53

Your father and your mother, let's say they're alive. They're sleeping. In the middle of the night, a burglar gets in.

00:35:56--> 00:35:59

And your father gets up, and he grapples with the burglar.

00:36:03--> 00:36:04

And the burglar is too powerful.

00:36:05--> 00:36:13

He opens the father. He's sitting on his chest and strangling him to death. He's gasping for breath. Your mother comes to the rescue.

00:36:15--> 00:36:16

And she saves the father's life.

00:36:18--> 00:36:20

Your father says your first name

00:36:21--> 00:36:22

is Nicholas.

00:36:24--> 00:36:25

Nicholas is

00:36:28--> 00:36:29

top of your mother's hands.

00:36:33--> 00:36:39

Yo, yo, dad tells you my son. Chop off your mother's head. Say Daddy, God.

00:36:40--> 00:36:43

Are you joking? No, I'm serious.

00:36:44--> 00:36:49

So daddy have been drinking. said my son. We are born again. Christians. We don't drink.

00:36:51--> 00:36:54

I haven't had that substance. I was baptized born again.

00:36:56--> 00:37:18

Then that is you are crazy. If you're not drunk, then you're crazy. This woman My Mother, she gave you 40 years of endless precious. She gave you so many beautiful tools. And she saved your life. On the top of her hands. Daddy, you are crazy. So your dad says no, my son, I'm inspired. So daddy who inspires you the devil.

00:37:19--> 00:37:28

The devil is the person who saved your life. Top of his hands is a demolition. So now my son, I'm inspired by God.

00:37:30--> 00:37:40

This is daddy. You are crazy. And the God who inspires us also crazy. Mr. Act, if this is a situation that your father

00:37:41--> 00:37:46

tells you to chop off your mother's hand for saving his life, then your dad is crazy. And he says

00:37:47--> 00:37:49

God is also crazy.

00:37:50--> 00:38:04

Do you agree with with the logic of this parable? Is he ever he will agree with that? Julie, I agree with in the house of Islam. For certain types of properties and theories. We say chop off the hands

00:38:05--> 00:38:07

for certain other countries chop off his head.

00:38:10--> 00:38:11

But this is somebody saving your life.

00:38:13--> 00:38:16

or her hands, your mother's hands. After all what she has done for you,

00:38:17--> 00:38:22

Daddy, you are crazy. And your God is also crazy. This is my son.

00:38:24--> 00:38:29

Deuteronomy, chapter 25. Deuteronomy, chapter 25.

00:38:32--> 00:38:33

Your Bible

00:38:34--> 00:38:35

and you must

00:38:37--> 00:38:41

increase may struggle to get up with one another.

00:38:42--> 00:38:47

And the wife of one has come near to deliver her husband out

00:38:48--> 00:38:50

of the one striking him

00:38:51--> 00:38:58

and she has thrust out her hand and grabbed hold of him by his privates. You must then amputate here, hey,

00:38:59--> 00:39:01

you I must be low. So

00:39:03--> 00:39:09

this woman, she says the father's life. And the book of God says chop off her hands.

00:39:11--> 00:39:13

So this is crazy.

00:39:15--> 00:39:20

Can this come from God? Can God be the Inspire of that? Nonsense?

00:39:21--> 00:39:25

That woman who saved your father's laptop overhead and your eyes must not show pity for her?

00:39:42--> 00:39:43

Can that be the Word of God?

00:39:46--> 00:39:47

Can God inspire such nonsense?

00:39:54--> 00:39:59

The Hindus to stand before FX and say this is my God.

00:40:00--> 00:40:02

Do you know that really

00:40:04--> 00:40:06

is in the dictionary? Is the lingo

00:40:07--> 00:40:09

in the phallus, just

00:40:12--> 00:40:12

the wishy

00:40:14--> 00:40:15

washy bit

00:40:18--> 00:40:34

Can you read the Roman Catholics, they take a piece of bread and they say there's the flesh of Jesus. We take some wine and this is the blood of Jesus. So you reason with them. He says, Look, man, this bread is bread. And this wine is wine.

00:40:35--> 00:40:41

This can become the flesh. Starch can become protein, and the wine can become blood.

00:40:42--> 00:40:44

That's your reasoning with the Roman Catholic.

00:40:47--> 00:40:50

So the Catholic said that you understand I believe

00:40:52--> 00:40:58

that I believe that the world is turning to flesh, and the wind is turning to blood.

00:41:00--> 00:41:11

But brother is your senses be like that, you know, the taste of mouth tells you that this is bread bread disk disk that you eating, and the wine is tasting like wine is practicing like blood. They said you don't understand is a mystery.

00:41:13--> 00:41:14

That's what the Roman Catholic tells

00:41:16--> 00:41:17

you recently the missus no man.

00:41:25--> 00:41:26

He said, But I believe

00:41:27--> 00:41:29

when a man says I believe

00:41:30--> 00:41:32

faith The reason is superstition.

00:41:36--> 00:41:41

Bread is bread, wine is wine. Tastes like into a lump of stones

00:41:42--> 00:41:46

in the shape of a phallus. That thing can neither help nor

00:41:50--> 00:41:51

this for 15 years I was

00:41:53--> 00:41:59

offered this quote of mine, this fellas, this lump of stone, some coconut, and I'm gonna send it to him now.

00:42:01--> 00:42:02

Because somebody might have helped you out.

00:42:04--> 00:42:07

I believe that this quote of mine gave me that said

00:42:09--> 00:42:10

there is no answer to that.

00:42:11--> 00:42:15

I believe that this is the word of God. This is like a silicone.

00:42:17--> 00:42:18

So but I believe that

00:42:19--> 00:42:22

I believe the Bible says I believe

00:42:24--> 00:42:25

this is superstition.

00:42:26--> 00:42:46

You have to back it up with logic reason. Give me a logical reason why your father should have your mother's hands chopped off for saving his life. Big Man you eat food. You don't need food. And because you need food you have to have clear cut intelligence read was read was for

00:42:49--> 00:42:51

the priest nor was for

00:42:52--> 00:42:53

you must not muzzle

00:42:54--> 00:42:56

the fool when it is threshing.

00:43:02--> 00:43:17

back now it's there is no context. It is by itself. That was beautiful. You see the Jews. These two muscles the ox I have the mouth ministered in the car trying to loosen.

00:43:19--> 00:43:21

The ox knows that that is food.

00:43:22--> 00:43:36

So while is trading the corn, it gives a bite. It gets a cob in its mouth. And it's time to loosen the grain and a few grains it gets in the mouth and nothing falls out. So it's choose choose choose another 15 minutes half an hour gives another bite.

00:43:37--> 00:43:38


00:43:39--> 00:43:42

boxes at lab Liberty con tie up them out.

00:43:44--> 00:43:51

The Merciful God, the Compassionate God. He says don't muscles the ox. How much is going to eat, let it eat.

00:43:52--> 00:43:53

I can believe that this is called

00:43:55--> 00:44:10

compassion compassionate, this kindness telling us also to be compassionate and kind to them Christians. The God who is so compassionate to the to the moon is not compassionate to a human being who saves the person's life. Can it be from the same God?

00:44:12--> 00:44:24

Can the same body on this level that to the ox is merciful, compassionate, and the human being does not feel pity for her. Your eyes must not pity her. Whatever she cries

00:44:28--> 00:44:29

This is chop off her hand.

00:44:31--> 00:44:33

Can you imagine God talking like that?

00:44:35--> 00:44:38

Can God say that? Well, I must be honest, I don't.

00:44:39--> 00:44:40

I don't imagine.

00:44:41--> 00:44:59

Right. Now I'm gonna tell you that I have just written an anthology book on the incest in the Bible, of all incest assessed incestuous. The thing is if you try to marry between these urges, having sex with people with whom you are very closely related

00:45:00--> 00:45:01

Like having sex with your mother,

00:45:02--> 00:45:08

your sister with your daughter, your daughter in law with somebody else's wife or daughter. That's fornication, adultery.

00:45:10--> 00:45:18

You see this in the Bible, very serious. The adulterer in the adulterous must be stoned to death. That's the Bible says.

00:45:19--> 00:45:30

The Holy Cow under this law is also under stripes, for the adulterer and the adulterous, very serious is next to murder in Islam, in its consequences next to murder, adultery.

00:45:33--> 00:45:39

So, but if you have sex with your own man, that's worse than having somebody else's wife or daughter. That's worse.

00:45:40--> 00:45:43

out of wedlock with somebody else's wife or daughter,

00:45:44--> 00:45:58

married or unmarried, it is next to murder. A very serious stole the guy to death. Since the Bible Book of Leviticus, the adulterer and the adulteress must be stoned to death, says the book of God.

00:46:00--> 00:46:05

But now being with your mother, is worse with your sister, your daughter is worse.

00:46:09--> 00:46:19

Now, you open up Genesis, chapter 19, was 1300 that Genesis chapter 19, verse 30, Genesis

00:46:33--> 00:47:00

a lot of went up from Swan and began training in the mountainous region, and his two daughters along with him, because he got afraid of failing in so. So he began trading in a key in his two daughters. And the firstborn proceeded to say to the yellow woman or father is blue. And there is not a man in the land to have relations with us according to the weight of the world.

00:47:02--> 00:47:04

Let us give our fathers a wine to drink.

00:47:07--> 00:47:09

and preserve offspring from Allah father.

00:47:10--> 00:47:26

So they kept giving their father wine to drink during that night. And the first one went in and lay down with a father. But he didn't know when she lay down. And when she got up, it came about on the next data, the first bone density the younger.

00:47:27--> 00:47:32

We are later with my father last night, let's give him wine to drink tonight,

00:47:33--> 00:47:51

any green light on with him and let us preserve offspring from her father. So they repeated repeatedly gave their father's wine to drink during the night. So then the piano caught up in later with him. Like he didn't know when she laid down in relation

00:47:54--> 00:47:57

to the daughters of Lord became pregnant from

00:48:01--> 00:48:02


00:48:03--> 00:48:06

You see, I don't know whether you can read this to your sister.

00:48:08--> 00:48:14

This story about the daughters of Lord seducing the father and night after night. That means the father is not

00:48:16--> 00:48:21

having intercourse with the daughter but the daughters are having with the Father. The father is old and this has gone cold

00:48:23--> 00:48:25

direction and then it's dead black.

00:48:26--> 00:48:29

Now the daughters have they're gonna collect the seat. Sister want to know

00:48:30--> 00:48:44

what happened here? See, this is a more explicit than the King James Version. He speaks about seed. As you think the seed of the father is talking about offspring. That means you don't have to have children

00:48:45--> 00:48:50

and pests. Both the daughters are not returned by the Father. They become pregnant by the father

00:48:52--> 00:48:53


00:48:55--> 00:48:57

with offsprings and God blesses them.

00:48:59--> 00:49:03

He blesses the moabites. When the Jews came out of Egypt,

00:49:04--> 00:49:10

they were told to massacre the Palestinians, men, women and children, even enemies were not to be spared.

00:49:11--> 00:49:19

And they killed the men and the women and the suckling and oxen and goats and sheep and even the donkeys.

00:49:21--> 00:49:21

But the

00:49:23--> 00:49:28

Bible says God says them, do not harass them, because they are the children of law.

00:49:29--> 00:49:30

They are a blessing people

00:49:31--> 00:49:38

having intercourse with his daughters and beating bastard children to insist they are to be protected in the Word of God.

00:49:39--> 00:49:43

That the Palestinians kill them all. Even sadly,

00:49:44--> 00:49:44


00:49:45--> 00:49:54

children also and they killed at the command of God. They killed men, women and children even saplings including donkeys.

00:49:56--> 00:49:59

by the mercies of God telling you to go kill donkeys also

00:50:00--> 00:50:02

thought since what says is the donkey is committed?

00:50:05--> 00:50:07

I'm asking what is the moral of this?

00:50:09--> 00:50:11

You see little children favorite things.

00:50:12--> 00:50:15

The Fox and the grapes. You heard about the Fox and the grapes,

00:50:16--> 00:50:28

the fox, you know, he sees a bunch of grapes. So it's tempting for the grapes of that country, he jumps again and again until he's tired. So the foxes sour grapes,

00:50:32--> 00:50:42

the Fox and the grapes, no fox jumps for grapes. You go for your chicken, and go for my back. But not for grapes. This is our way of telling the child.

00:50:43--> 00:50:46

My child, when you can get it in use a sour grapes.

00:50:48--> 00:50:50

Garbage, because you can get it.

00:50:52--> 00:50:53

But you're going to shadow.

00:50:56--> 00:51:05

The boy his mouth is crossing wooden bridge across the river. He sees his reflection in the water. He sees another dog with a bone in his mouth. He doesn't know by reflection. So his beautiful

00:51:09--> 00:51:11

model is my child.

00:51:15--> 00:51:17

You ready for that? But God has given us that as well.

00:51:20--> 00:51:27

We tell our children fairy tales, fables, these things didn't happen. No doc equal to more or less is

00:51:30--> 00:51:57

more or less. These are the fields were telling created. We invented them to teach a moral lesson. Now, whatever you read, it has an effect on your mind. Our South African government has been very good against pornography, against pornography. The things I came back from Heathrow Airport, from Kennedy Airport, and I bring those magazines here I can go to jail for two years. up to lately, it was so stricter on things as

00:52:01--> 00:52:04

a metro man I can deal with I like you know, you can do anything to me,

00:52:05--> 00:52:09

is an evil influence, to go to jail for two years.

00:52:10--> 00:52:15

Because he is going to have effect as a sister, not as a

00:52:20--> 00:52:25

mother, it's going to have effect on her. And if you see me in a father season, he has a right to kill.

00:52:28--> 00:52:31

What are you trying to do? What do you think insinuate

00:52:32--> 00:52:34

that he's trying to feel reactions.

00:52:36--> 00:52:41

I don't want to exploit her. says no, no, no, don't do that to my sister. You don't need to my wife

00:52:43--> 00:52:51

talking about God and religion and open a book of pornography. And I'm trying to show you the pictures. And if you came up to me at the time said

00:52:53--> 00:52:56

you are a man of God, rubbish. You know, get out.

00:52:58--> 00:53:22

Kick your punch me at least he said get out of house and boondock and my daughter again, because he's an evil influence. So Dr. Vernon Jones and American psychologist of great repute, he carried out experiments on groups of schoolchildren to be certain stories will be great. And he said that these stories meet certain slight but permanent changes in character. Even in the narrow classroom situation.

00:53:23--> 00:53:33

Like we have in history in South Africa. The name of the book The history book when I was in our country, South Africa our title of the book our country

00:53:35--> 00:53:38

everything I'm reading is from the white man's point of view and I believe

00:53:39--> 00:53:40

that's his country

00:53:42--> 00:53:43

you know don't give them peace

00:53:47--> 00:53:49

India and China

00:53:50--> 00:53:51

This is what the programming

00:53:53--> 00:53:56

took a long long time man but the damn thing to go off because now

00:53:58--> 00:54:01

this country is white man's country. I didn't know that.

00:54:02--> 00:54:03


00:54:04--> 00:54:09

This is our title of the book is our country and that our day is not me.

00:54:12--> 00:54:25

So programming the type of suppose util children. Suppose in the story about the applicant is alluded to is like this is like that. The children grew up every applicant This is a very cutthroat

00:54:27--> 00:54:31

program. So is it these stories and the same

00:54:33--> 00:54:46

educational age group isn't is a standard to children. There's also another standard to children. You tell the spinner two children the story of St. George the galaxy and john How do you know he saw this?

00:54:48--> 00:54:51

The other good you have the same same joy is the same but you know he

00:54:52--> 00:54:54

ran home and kind of his mother's laps

00:54:56--> 00:54:59

around the tree and is howling for his father actually

00:55:00--> 00:55:02

Real Life, this is how the children will be that type of thing.

00:55:04--> 00:55:08

They have the type of mentality wants to know, man, this was me and you look for something

00:55:10--> 00:55:20

and he smashes on it is programmed, something happens like that in real life, you start looking for a stick or a stone. That's what he's gonna do. You keep on trying

00:55:21--> 00:55:36

to think of nothing but running away. So is he ketalar experiments in groups of children when certain studies are being read, and he says these stories made certain slight but permanent changes in character, even in the narrow classroom situation, even little things.

00:55:37--> 00:55:40

So now YUI father cohabiting with his daughters, yes.

00:55:41--> 00:55:47

Then Genesis chapter 35, verse 22, you open it, it speaks about Roman, the eldest son of Jacob.

00:55:48--> 00:55:50

He was in Columbus with his mother

00:55:51--> 00:55:52

in common language.

00:55:54--> 00:56:31

And he's I've heard people say these results in your Sunday school life. And he didn't school the fellow he didn't spank the fellow, and didn't you ate syphilis, gonorrhea, nothing. Then still Genesis, chapter a 38, speaks about Judah, the father of the Jewish race. He's going to tell that to share a sheep in sees a woman sitting by the roadside, he thinks he's a heart at heart. So he comes up to her and says, allow me to come in into the Please, I beg you let me have sex with you. So she said, totally give me with you. So she said, totally give me teaching your daughters prostitution, this is prostitution.

00:56:33--> 00:56:34

punishing go to hell.

00:56:38--> 00:56:39

And because master

00:56:40--> 00:56:41


00:56:44--> 00:56:45

and his best,

00:56:46--> 00:56:49

his best, he's become the great grandfather of Jesus Christ

00:56:51--> 00:56:52

in the genealogy

00:56:55--> 00:56:58

where does that fit into this book of God?

00:56:59--> 00:57:00

Is that your doctrine?

00:57:04--> 00:57:06

Is that is that is that true?

00:57:07--> 00:57:08

was punished.

00:57:09--> 00:57:14

He was blessed? Is all it? Is that your instruction in righteousness?

00:57:16--> 00:57:16

You don't have

00:57:18--> 00:57:20

to question God's authority. You don't know why

00:57:23--> 00:57:24

is Judah

00:57:26--> 00:57:27

he got intelligible.

00:57:30--> 00:57:31

In his wisdom, he knows.

00:57:33--> 00:57:35

He got a lot of peace in

00:57:36--> 00:57:37

his life.

00:57:38--> 00:57:39


00:57:40--> 00:57:44

mother telling him go do that. Because

00:57:45--> 00:57:53

if God said such a thing, what can I How can I question him? Before each and every one of them. They are doing it surreptitiously.

00:57:55--> 00:57:59

So in other words, that they knew they were doing wrong, but God didn't punish them.

00:58:00--> 00:58:24

But one is punished. punished. The father in law is not in law in producing children. He's blessed. So where does that fit into the book of God? Okay, before we will answer that, can you please come to the point you stated, as the Bible as it is? Do you believe that the old version of who they are passing the Bible

00:58:27--> 00:58:31

probably became the Bible. There are four types of evidences this.

00:58:33--> 00:58:37

One is I said, there is a word of God in the Bible, the Word of God.

00:58:38--> 00:58:48

To give you example, as in Deuteronomy, chapter 18, verse 18, we have been dealing with the God says, I will raise them at a profit, this is I

00:58:51--> 00:59:07

I will put my words in his mouth, this is I am My God. And he shall speak unto the altar, I shall commanded, who is this i? God, Jesus is God. The Christian says, God, and I say is God. So we are agreed that the word of God

00:59:08--> 00:59:21

in the book of Isaiah will remember the former things of old God and there is none else. I am God, and there's none like me. Who's talking? Costco. Although the words we hear from the mouths of Isaiah,

00:59:22--> 00:59:28

I am God out of human habit, we have a tendency, when you're quoting, the devil said, the devil said, You know, I am

00:59:30--> 00:59:39

the god of this world, and the god of this world that never said that. I am the god of this world, you can beat your chest, but I understand that is not your unit claiming to be

00:59:40--> 00:59:54

the only coating. So as a prophet, he said, I am God and there is none else. And God in this new CBA besides me, talking, got his talk. He's got to cheat through the most nice properties.

00:59:55--> 00:59:59

So we have no hesitation versus like that in the Bible. I can show you

01:00:00--> 01:00:00


01:00:03--> 01:00:09

of the Bible revelation God said to john, right, then john wrote all what God says.

01:00:12--> 01:00:28

JOHN tells you now, he says, john said to him tonight, we don't know whether he was told or not. That's all debatable. But now, when I'm quoting you, I am God. And there is none as I am God in this man like me, he said, these are the Word of God, no questions

01:00:31--> 01:00:33

written by Moses, Moses was

01:00:35--> 01:01:21

a prophet. Okay. But who is I don't know whose idea is called not Moses is called, not Moses. So this is another hesitation in the last book of the Bible, things to say that is God. So he says, not a common ground between the Judeo Christian Muslim countries versus this is God's word. The Christian says that the juices and the Muslim says that, so there is no dispute on grass. Then there is another type of evidence. For example, like Jesus said, It has been said that of all time, Thou shalt not commit adultery. But I say unto you, Whosoever looketh upon a woman to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. So who said that is a Jesus?

01:01:22--> 01:01:25

These are the words of a prophet of God. Again, is it?

01:01:27--> 01:01:45

An eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, But I say unto you, I say unto you, is not evil. He who strikes him that he was was a prophet of God. So we believe in the Word of God, and we believe there's a word of the prophet of God, then we have a third type of evidence all in the Bible.

01:01:46--> 01:01:51

This is all he was going into the way who Jesus, he saw

01:01:53--> 01:01:55

a tax collector called Matthew,

01:01:57--> 01:01:58

Matthew nine.

01:01:59--> 01:02:08

And he came up to him, Matthew, and said unto him, Matthew, follow me, Jesus, and he met, you followed him, Jesus, we say, these are not those of God.

01:02:10--> 01:02:12

Jesus, and these are not those of Matthew.

01:02:14--> 01:02:32

Matthew was writing. So while I was waiting for him to the way I saw tactically to connect you, I went up to him and told him to follow me. And he followed me that Jesus, Matthew said, he was waiting for the way, Jesus, you know, he came up to me and asked me to follow him. And I followed him, to it

01:02:33--> 01:02:37

normally got right that these are the words of an eyewitness.

01:02:38--> 01:02:41

Witness, or somebody writing from hearsay

01:02:43--> 01:02:54

of God. From our point of view, this is another water deposit is another word of the disciple, Matthew. But these are words of some eyewitness or your witness or somebody, just whatever he heard is,

01:02:57--> 01:02:58

then there is another type of evidence

01:03:05--> 01:03:08

treats him son, with his mother

01:03:09--> 01:03:16

in law, and one of the sons of David Amnon, he goes on as a sister. And the father didn't, didn't spank him.

01:03:17--> 01:03:21

Another Son of David, on the periscope, in the absence of the Father, he puts up a tent.

01:03:23--> 01:03:25

And he gathers all his hands, his wife,

01:03:26--> 01:03:30

an ak 4710 of them in a row in the side of the visa

01:03:34--> 01:03:38

doesn't fit him into pornography, of the highest order.

01:03:41--> 01:03:50

mothers who say 10 in a row, ak 47, drilling them all, in the side of the hole, to show his father a point, you want to show his father a point in his absence.

01:03:56--> 01:03:59

We also have things like that in the house,

01:04:00--> 01:04:02

we have the word of God.

01:04:06--> 01:04:23

Then we have the second book called the books of Hades traditions, then we have the workings of our historians, philosophers, separate book this is separate would have got separate, what are the profits separate? What are the historian separate? And pornography also we have.

01:04:25--> 01:04:26

But this is not in the book.

01:04:27--> 01:04:37

The profit is not in the book, the history is not in the book. The pornography is not in the book. So in your case, you've got everything in one book. So if I get you

01:04:41--> 01:04:41


01:04:46--> 01:04:55

please. So what do you think about the displays of Jesus Christ? The words of you believe that is a prophet of God this is so what do

01:04:56--> 01:04:57

you think about history

01:05:01--> 01:05:03

Although I like to realize because I

01:05:05--> 01:05:07

cannot read it myself, Jesus said to him,

01:05:09--> 01:05:20

I am He said that he told us, I am the way, and the truth. And the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. Beautiful.

01:05:24--> 01:05:26

Thomas. Now I'm asking.

01:05:29--> 01:05:30

I'm asking you, what is the context?

01:05:32--> 01:05:34

You see, you quoted something now, that means you have an idea.

01:05:36--> 01:05:37

Like when I quoted you

01:05:38--> 01:05:43

quoted you all, first of all, he said, I'm going to prepare place for you.

01:05:48--> 01:05:48

I'm going to prepare

01:05:50--> 01:05:53

the night before he was in tears. So no.

01:05:55--> 01:06:07

Thomas asked him, where are you going? Right? So now, Christ, Jesus says, you can wear coconut No. And he said to him, and the truth, the way in the light that no one comes to my father.

01:06:08--> 01:06:15

So now for us to have a closer relationship with God, I should do so through Christ is the way that

01:06:18--> 01:06:19

I give you my,

01:06:20--> 01:06:21

my my view of that.

01:06:23--> 01:06:26

You are the first Christian, I have come across

01:06:27--> 01:06:31

it, who knows the context? I must congratulate you for that.

01:06:32--> 01:06:34

You see, people just quote

01:06:37--> 01:06:38

some asking what is the context?

01:06:41--> 01:06:45

He quoted the verse I want you to give me the context in which because if you're quoting, you must know what your

01:06:47--> 01:06:50

study is about. So nice. Yeah, exactly. As you said,

01:06:52--> 01:07:01

this is telling the disciples, I'm going to provide a place for you. In my Father's house, there are many mentions here, it was not so I would have told you, and whether I go, No, and the way you know,

01:07:03--> 01:07:12

they misunderstood. The disciples misunderstood. They said, blaster, we know not whither thou gavest. And how can we know the way

01:07:13--> 01:07:31

Jesus is talking about spiritual matters? They are thinking about geographical locations, either going to Bethlehem Kennedy, where we don't have any way in answer to that. He says, time, the way, the truth and the life. No man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

01:07:33--> 01:07:42

In other words, is telling them that we're on the way to God is personified in me, look at me, the way I am going, if you follow me, you will see,

01:07:43--> 01:07:53

the truth of God is personified in real life is personified in me, look at me, the way I am going, you go, you will reach the destination, not geography

01:07:56--> 01:07:56

is to hear

01:07:58--> 01:08:03

what he's telling them, I am the way the truth and the life No man, we can grasp that.

01:08:04--> 01:08:09

They're always misunderstanding everything. Look, again, and again, Jesus says, You have little faith, you have little

01:08:13--> 01:08:36

things explaining to them, as explained to little children, when they can't seem to grasp. She said, I even read without understanding yet. What's wrong with you guys? Man? You know, I mean, is that at the premium, you know, things are coming to an end, and I want to help you, I want to teach you and tell me told you're not listening, you're not understanding. And when he's proved further, he says, oh, faithless and perverse generation.

01:08:37--> 01:08:45

How long should I be with you? How long should I be with you? I said, if he was a Japanese, he would have committed suicide.

01:08:47--> 01:08:53

Everything is a misunderstanding. So he says, I'll delete them. First is the wait and

01:08:55--> 01:08:59

see me. You see me, you follow me? You read.

01:09:01--> 01:09:02

So this

01:09:03--> 01:09:04

shows the father

01:09:06--> 01:09:10

that she was caught and obviously talking fancy talk to us.

01:09:13--> 01:09:14

That she was calling God.

01:09:16--> 01:09:19

So Jesus says, Philip, you have been with me for so long.

01:09:21--> 01:09:35

He was a Jew, that the scripture says, God is not seen at any time, woman can see God and then you is a Jew. And by this I was three years later you learn nothing. You still see God with your bodily eyes, when you can even look at the sun.

01:09:37--> 01:09:38

You will see God.

01:09:40--> 01:09:45

If you have seen me, you have seen the Father, if you understood me would have understood what God is.

01:09:47--> 01:09:53

If you understood me to understand what causes you to make such a silly request. So this

01:09:54--> 01:09:59

misunderstanding is the way to go. For who for the junos is telling them

01:10:00--> 01:10:09

Follow me. He's the Messiah, he's come to reform them reclaim the formalism from the ceremonial design from the hypocrisy. He wants to save them. But

01:10:11--> 01:10:13

he didn't say that he is the only way to

01:10:15--> 01:10:21

see every prophet of God, we believe in their own time in their own dispensation. They are the way to God.

01:10:25--> 01:10:30

We have to follow him. If you want to be in God's goodness, in the time of law, to listen to him,

01:10:32--> 01:10:40

you have to listen to him. In the time of Moses, you listen to him in the time of day when you listen to him, each and every prophet of God in his time, in his dispensation, he is the way to God.

01:10:42--> 01:10:44

But Jesus Christ says,

01:10:46--> 01:10:52

he cannot be happy, when He, the Spirit of truth has come, He will guide

01:10:54--> 01:11:12

you, but you haven't got the bloody capacity. So he's promising you somebody other than himself, that He will guide you into all truth. For he shall not speak from himself shall hear, that shall he speak, and he shall declare unto you the things that are to come, he shall clarify me.

01:11:14--> 01:11:18

As he said, no one can come to my father, except

01:11:25--> 01:11:27

the Jews of his time, there was no way

01:11:28--> 01:11:35

they have to listen to the time of Moses, here to listen to Moses, in the time of David, Jesus,

01:11:36--> 01:11:51

in the time of Muhammad, listen to Muhammad, every prophet of God, He is the mouthpiece of God, he's the firstborn of God. And in that person's life, you have to listen to him. If you want to be on the right side with God,

01:11:52--> 01:11:55

this is what my understanding is that he's telling me

01:11:57--> 01:11:57

besides his training,

01:11:58--> 01:12:09

and the disciples, he's telling the whole of God, that you have to listen to him. He is the mouthpiece of God. Now for non believers, they listen to me, but I've got many more things to tell you.

01:12:10--> 01:12:15

The problems of race, the problem of alcoholism, the problem of surplus women.

01:12:17--> 01:12:24

I don't know time to tell you all this. So now what Mr. Cheadle says that Jesus was a he was a prophet to the to the Jews.

01:12:25--> 01:12:30

History is telling us not said, I've not seen, but under the Russia

01:12:32--> 01:12:44

GUI not into the way of the Gentiles and ethnicity of the Samaritans. And he not, but go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Who said Go ahead, Nick, all the people decided.

01:12:46--> 01:12:48

When did you say that? Look, all right.

01:12:51--> 01:12:52

This is what the call

01:12:56--> 01:12:57

is with us.

01:13:00--> 01:13:02

Prophecy after the event.

01:13:04--> 01:13:08

Most of these Bibles, I'm sorry, some of them, they have a default Bible.

01:13:10--> 01:13:11

So what

01:13:12--> 01:13:12


01:13:15--> 01:13:20

means everything that Jesus is supposed to have spoken. There in red.

01:13:23--> 01:13:28

Not done that the Muslims, the Christians, if a 90% is black

01:13:29--> 01:13:44

90% of the New Testament is all black. That is not the word of Jesus, even the Word of God is not even the words of Jesus, how much 90% 90% of the Bible is black?

01:13:46--> 01:13:52

Then out of the 10%, that is infrared Christians choruses. This is Jesus couldn't have added this. This is

01:13:54--> 01:13:55

again, more than 50% is taken out.

01:13:57--> 01:14:03

In other words, the records were not clear. Nobody wrote Jesus Christ in his lifetime. He never wrote a word.

01:14:06--> 01:14:15

To write a word, and not a word was returned in his lifetime. Not a word was written in his lifetime. I see something is missing. Okay?

01:14:17--> 01:14:18

his weaknesses, right.

01:14:20--> 01:14:21

So now

01:14:24--> 01:14:25

he didn't write

01:14:26--> 01:14:27

you, you ask your

01:14:29--> 01:14:30

earliest manuscript that you have.

01:14:31--> 01:14:47

There are three to 400 year old, earliest, the most ancient that you have, that is in your possession, three to 400 years after Jesus. And these are copies of copies of copies because what I know, ya know where they are no originals.

01:14:51--> 01:14:54

And these are copies of copies of copies and our

01:14:55--> 01:14:59

trading booklet. They're telling us your scars are telling us that

01:15:00--> 01:15:01

You see in copy by hand,

01:15:04--> 01:15:24

in hand, so in other words, the people each and every one had his own ideas, everything happened after the Nicene Creed, the scriptures that you have, or after the Nicene Creed, all the manuscript that you have the 325, how to 325. All the manuscripts are dated after that, that is their current industry.

01:15:25--> 01:15:27

idea. So they

01:15:28--> 01:15:33

start pushing started pushing in, and now you have to untangle this

01:15:36--> 01:15:38

to be very faithful job, a beautiful job.

01:15:41--> 01:15:49

You are strongest in your opposition to the Trinity. But you know, this, this Trinity is not in any Bible. Did you know?

01:15:53--> 01:15:53

Did you know that?

01:15:55--> 01:15:57

Oh, yes, I noticed. What does it say?

01:16:03--> 01:16:03

You should

01:16:06--> 01:16:06

believe in it.

01:16:12--> 01:16:13

This is puppet it'll be better for you.

01:16:15--> 01:16:17

For your God is one God is not in one.

01:16:18--> 01:16:31

Long before muscle and prostate. JOHN before the Jehovah's Witness movement came into being officially as a body. This book for 1400 years is telling you don't say Trinity study.

01:16:33--> 01:16:37

For you. It says Jesus is not God. The Holy Quran was written

01:16:40--> 01:16:40

after Jesus,

01:16:42--> 01:16:44

where the Christians were teaching truth, right.

01:16:47--> 01:16:50

So God Almighty didn't wait 2000 years for Russell and

01:16:54--> 01:16:55


01:16:58--> 01:17:00

Russell and Russell,

01:17:01--> 01:17:12

before they started this movement, about against the Trinity, but for 1400 years, this book is telling you don't say Trinity. This is Jesus God. This book says

01:17:15--> 01:17:25

anyone who said the Jesus Christ, the son of Mary's God is blasphemy is an act of treason against against God, McConnell mercy, but the massassi said,

01:17:27--> 01:17:30

nothing's right. That was worship Allah, God Almighty,

01:17:31--> 01:17:33

who is my Lord and your Lord?

01:17:35--> 01:17:38

Whoever will associate anyone with ALLAH, the God.

01:17:40--> 01:17:41

God will forbidden paradise.

01:17:43--> 01:17:45

In the fire, apparently they're grilling place, family.

01:17:47--> 01:17:59

And for the Broncos 11 to 1400 years ago, is teaching what you are teaching today. Jesus is not God, this book condemned in the strongest terms he has. But it's true that even the Bible even before that

01:18:00--> 01:18:05

he read the Bible, even before the Quran was written,

01:18:07--> 01:18:08

don't say?

01:18:09--> 01:18:10


01:18:12--> 01:18:12

as I

01:18:13--> 01:18:18

hear the word is there, the trend is there. But he's telling you don't

01:18:19--> 01:18:23

be mistaken at heart If you come to an explanation that the Trinity is not a valid

01:18:25--> 01:18:26

research research

01:18:27--> 01:18:34

from the very beginning, Christians, early Christians in the year 325. The Council is missing

01:18:35--> 01:18:39

that they officially you know, they voted democratically.

01:18:41--> 01:18:43

But there was a dispute among

01:18:45--> 01:18:45

others, like

01:18:48--> 01:18:52

the people as a whole, they were treated in from the beginning.

01:18:54--> 01:19:02

So the thing was there, but now this was trinitarianism was taken over. Now what is the position of the Muslims? What it tells us

01:19:04--> 01:19:08

is a fabric is a false falsity. Jesus being God is a destiny.

01:19:09--> 01:19:20

So in other words, this thing is doing the job for 1400 years, that book is doing the job and there's not a single Muslim who believes in the Trinity. There's not a single Muslim who believes that Jesus God

01:19:22--> 01:19:30

in that, we are going together, even now, the difference is they already know what do you believe about Jesus? Because

01:19:31--> 01:19:38

we say, Jesus, Jesus was a prophet. We say he was one of the mightiest messengers of God, one of the mightiest mismatches.

01:19:40--> 01:19:51

One of the mightiest one of them. You see, now we follow the advice of Jesus. He says, Judge not that ye be not just for with what judgment eg should be judged. And

01:19:54--> 01:19:59

so he said that we are not in judgment upon the prophets of God. Between Moses and

01:20:00--> 01:20:26

Jesus, who was more acceptable in the sight of God, that's not your department. This is not your business, not my business. in the sight of God, each of his ministers he loves most of who is most valuable even to Mandela when he gets his cabinet, leave it to the clerk in his cabinet, you are not to say that the Foreign Affairs Minister, he's the most important guy. That's not your business is not my business, in the sight of God who he loves most.

01:20:28--> 01:20:28


01:20:29--> 01:20:49

We are not to discriminate between the messengers of God, they are the servants of God, they can do your job, love them, respect them, review them, follow them, but don't worship anyone. That is in a nutshell, Islamic teaching is love them, respect them, review them, follow them, but worship none of them.

01:20:50--> 01:20:50

Not even

01:20:53--> 01:21:01

Jesus, not the Son of God, Muhammad is no such nonsense. The guys didn't have anybody seen but mama died for your sins. He said no such nonsense.

01:21:02--> 01:21:04

You say the soul that

01:21:06--> 01:21:19

he opposes the Son shall not be the iniquity of the Father, father and himself. He says we are not responsible for what he did. He paid the full price, he paid more than the price due from any person for making a mistake.

01:21:24--> 01:21:36

Or the Father, the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him anything good thing the good man does, he will get his foot his rewards and the wickedness of the emphasis be upon him. You do wrong up for it. But if the wicked will

01:21:38--> 01:21:47

repent from the elders, that is committed, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die. He says that is Islam.

01:21:50--> 01:21:50

That is

01:21:51--> 01:21:59

not that you are responsible for your actions. I am responsible for my nobody pays for your sales. Nobody pays for mine. Stand up for your.

01:22:00--> 01:22:02

So this is biblical.

01:22:04--> 01:22:12

This is biblical. This is nothing new Islam is not teaching you anything new. But now with regards to this man, Jesus. What does this book say?

01:22:26--> 01:22:28

So I have a quote on

01:22:37--> 01:22:38

the index,

01:22:39--> 01:22:41

about Jesus. Jesus

01:22:43--> 01:22:45

is the true prophet of God. Chapter Six was a

01:22:48--> 01:22:49

chapter six was 85

01:22:56--> 01:22:59

pages of the index doesn't matter, because as I said,

01:23:01--> 01:23:03

these are righteous 685.

01:23:05--> 01:23:26

His birth is described in two places his book, chapter three, verses 45 onwards. And chapter 19, verses 22 onwards, his apostle to Israel, his disciples taken up like Adam, not crucified, no more than a pastor, not God, sent the gospel, not Son of God, physically, physically,

01:23:27--> 01:23:28

biologically, is not the Son of God.

01:23:30--> 01:23:33

Metaphorically, we are the children of God know

01:23:35--> 01:23:40

what Christ meant when he said, Because Christ Himself said that he is the Son of God,

01:23:43--> 01:23:49

in the same sense that even the others are sons of God. You see, he said, he just picked up stones again to stone it.

01:23:53--> 01:24:07

Jesus says, many good works have I showed you for my father, for which of those words we use Tony. So we say, for the good work, please don't do that for blasphemy. Because the Durbin amendment was so the god

01:24:08--> 01:24:18

that's what the Christian was a look. He was not blasphemy because he was God, and he was entitled to. So that's not that's funny, that you say your blasphemy. What is that Jesus keeps?

01:24:20--> 01:24:20


01:24:21--> 01:24:23

He says, Is it not written in your law?

01:24:25--> 01:24:27

Now it is.

01:24:29--> 01:24:34

It's also his role. But is it not in your lungs? In your book, man?

01:24:43--> 01:24:45

Is it not in your role? The Hebrew

01:24:48--> 01:24:59

is not in your car is not in your law. I said he are God. If he got it, all done God. The Word of God cain is quoting from a second sir

01:25:00--> 01:25:06

The whole God, and all of you are the Most High. God is calling them God.

01:25:08--> 01:25:09

There's no small Jean Hebrew and Greek.

01:25:14--> 01:25:31

In your law, God, and all of you that were at the Most High, in the book of Exodus, God speaks to Moses. And this has been called, I have made you a god to Pharaoh, and Aaron deposition. So this level language when we talk like that, because he calls it, you know, you talk about God and

01:25:34--> 01:25:40

God Buthelezi, but use the word that's your language, because it's cheap, cheap, but God Almighty.

01:25:42--> 01:25:49

God Almighty, you know, the chief presume that you mean God. This is our language. Suppose you call him cozy? And

01:25:51--> 01:26:01

you don't mean and your God, but you call God also a sense, is it in your law? I said, your God, he called them God's unto him the Word of God,

01:26:05--> 01:26:21

and the other sanctified and sent into the world that are blasphemous, because I said, I'm the son of God. This is the rest of expression, if others are called God, and you find no fault with that, why are you finding fault with me? When I say I'm the son of God, then God has got sons by the terms. In

01:26:24--> 01:26:29

Genesis, chapter six, verse three is that and the sons of God are the daughters of men.

01:26:33--> 01:26:34

How many,

01:26:35--> 01:26:43

many nice, it's fun to imagine even the sons of God because Luke say,

01:26:45--> 01:26:47

when the sons of God came in,

01:26:48--> 01:26:51

to the daughters of men, unfortunate to them, they became great men.

01:26:53--> 01:26:54

In the Hebrew Bible,

01:26:55--> 01:27:17

then in the book of Exodus, God says, This is Israel is my son, even my firstborn in the book of Jeremiah is this evening is my son, even my firstborn in the book of Psalms is fixed to David is I will declare a decree and to re that Thou art my Son this day. Why? Because then in the New Testament, we are told, as many as are led by the Spirit of God, or the sons of God.

01:27:19--> 01:27:29

If you follow the plan of God, you are a godly person, in the language of the Jew, in the name of the Julius Caesar, the Son of God, is a stunning to choose. So you have your father, the devil,

01:27:31--> 01:27:31

the Devil Devil,

01:27:33--> 01:27:33


01:27:36--> 01:27:39

So in other words, you do devilish thing your father is the devil

01:27:41--> 01:27:45

is a metaphorical statement in the language of the Jews,

01:27:47--> 01:27:48

the Son of God,

01:27:51--> 01:27:52

by the terms in your book,

01:27:54--> 01:27:55

and others

01:27:56--> 01:28:01

in your book, and then transferred with that, and you finally fall within that trouble.

01:28:03--> 01:28:05

Read, as he say, is exclusively caught.

01:28:10--> 01:28:11

In Matthew 16,

01:28:12--> 01:28:16

where he asked his disciples, who do you think that you are?

01:28:18--> 01:28:21

The Son of the living God, Peter said, Your Christ

01:28:29--> 01:28:30


01:28:34--> 01:28:36

In other words, in the language that you're talking,

01:28:43--> 01:28:51

but I'm not blaming divinity, claiming to be God, is your language Now, of course, he knew the chief and the Chief of this place. So I have a right to say this, but

01:28:53--> 01:28:54

he did it, he said it.

01:28:57--> 01:28:57

Just to demonstrate

01:28:59--> 01:29:15

that, that is when you're looking for trouble in the manual find it. But now this man Jesus didn't last name. See, God has got sons by the times in the Bible. And in that sense, metaphorically, he say, we are all the children of God.

01:29:16--> 01:29:16


01:29:18--> 01:29:20

Judas Iscariot was also in the good,

01:29:22--> 01:29:24

the good and the bad. Jesus when

01:29:26--> 01:29:41

he called the Son of God, any one of us, because it is not faithful to God than any of us can ever be, from that point of view, his pre eminently the Son of God, but the Christian says, Jesus is the only begotten son be caught and not made.

01:29:42--> 01:29:45

This while you know that God says,

01:29:51--> 01:29:52

got into a call in the Midwest.

01:29:56--> 01:29:59

Right, Nicodemus that God loved the world that He gave. It is only

01:30:00--> 01:30:01

gotten tonight now?

01:30:03--> 01:30:06

Is that in your journals witness Bible? 2016? Yes.

01:30:08--> 01:30:09

Please check it out.

01:30:11--> 01:30:12

Your smoochie

01:30:16--> 01:30:17


01:30:19--> 01:30:23

King James Version, it is a question is there.

01:30:26--> 01:30:26


01:30:27--> 01:30:28


01:30:29--> 01:30:38

that would be cotton. You see, in your office told you that people have been translating the Bible according to the old preconceived notions.

01:30:40--> 01:30:46

So, even inadvertently or advertently things crept in, according to your beliefs.

01:30:47--> 01:30:50

She says the same thing. She

01:30:52--> 01:30:58

says make sense. How did things happened, what happened? So, now, this

01:30:59--> 01:31:00

is reversed at version

01:31:07--> 01:31:13

32 scholars have the highest eminence, backed by 50 cooperating denominations, they went introduce this book,

01:31:14--> 01:31:19

and what the Christian Bible says about it, you don't have to deal with that. But this

01:31:21--> 01:31:47

Church of England newspaper says the finest version which has been produced in the present century, in the present century at times literary supplement is a completely fresh Translation by scholars of the highest eminence, language, which is not only dignified, but also contemporary, fullest use of the resources of modern scholarship life and works is the well look characteristics of the Authorized Version, combined with a new accuracy of translation.

01:31:48--> 01:31:52

The time says, the most accurate and close rendering

01:31:54--> 01:31:54

What is it?

01:31:58--> 01:32:15

They say they say this one here. See, the King James version and the gear version are based on the ancient manuscripts. There is an ancient manuscript. This one here is the most ancient manuscript.

01:32:16--> 01:32:29

So when you open this, you find out why, because in the most ancient manuscript that they have, the word is not there. For the three that they recall in heaven. The father, the wood, and acrylic was

01:32:31--> 01:32:41

the most ancient doesn't have it, and it's a later on accretion has gotten into the book is not waiting it out, we take it out. So

01:32:43--> 01:32:44

these are not treated.

01:32:45--> 01:32:46

Java's witnesses,

01:32:47--> 01:32:48

this is taken out

01:32:49--> 01:32:50

from the list, and

01:32:57--> 01:33:00

this was the first amendment, they came out with this

01:33:01--> 01:33:12

data, to be fair, the mirror to the source, the mouth, and the thing would be up to me is the time of Jesus, something was written in the north and the

01:33:15--> 01:33:20

more authentic than 500 years later, this is common sense. So going back to the most ancient manuscripts

01:33:23--> 01:33:29

because healthy, someone gave us something to call 200

01:33:36--> 01:33:39

interpolated that was the Trinity.

01:33:40--> 01:33:43

But when did you do that? You did it 600 years

01:33:44--> 01:33:48

after the event. So now the later you have a chance of adding

01:33:49--> 01:33:51

to explain things you only think

01:33:53--> 01:33:54

that's it

01:33:55--> 01:34:02

supposed to be doing about that was See, he wrote a marginal note for his own edification of

01:34:04--> 01:34:06

when the people had that manuscript for reproduction

01:34:08--> 01:34:17

brought into the main text. Now when you discover that that is what is happening, so honestly, the more that you take it out, so

01:34:19--> 01:34:20

similarly, there

01:34:23--> 01:34:24

was also not a

01:34:29--> 01:34:33

lot, but it was the Muslim says Don't talk like that.

01:34:34--> 01:34:37

Don't say Jesus. Don't talk like that.

01:34:38--> 01:34:43

These people are now this I don't say that out.

01:34:45--> 01:34:53

But honesty scholarship demanded that they do all these things that this is not in the most ancient. This is a little accretion. Take it out so they took it out

01:34:55--> 01:34:56


01:35:00--> 01:35:03

Why he said this was a little accretion also.

01:35:05--> 01:35:10

Then they took out my CDs what happens now with all of the input images, witnesses

01:35:14--> 01:35:15

mustn't get emotional

01:35:20--> 01:35:20

qualities in

01:35:22--> 01:35:35

the first guy who come across who's prepared to listen, you don't agree with me. But you're giving me a hearing, I can see you're giving an honest hearing. This is what it is. Then the verses on verses

01:35:36--> 01:35:37

chapter 16.

01:35:40--> 01:35:41

Chapter 16,

01:35:44--> 01:35:45

Chapter 16,

01:35:47--> 01:35:47

Chapter 16,

01:36:00--> 01:36:22

long conclusion and short conclusion. Now, the long conclusion, would you conclude that this is the word of God or not? According to your reading, he read this 16 was eight. And then that was mine. After he rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, do you accept that as the Word of God?

01:36:24--> 01:36:25

He just checks.

01:36:31--> 01:36:32

To see this now, they

01:36:34--> 01:36:45

they played a trick on you on you, by telling you all these things, certain ancient manuscripts, a CD and version vision, the following long conclusion, but which

01:36:52--> 01:36:55

he read that it doesn't matter to you, and all this

01:36:57--> 01:37:00

good code. I don't really understand this code.

01:37:01--> 01:37:04

Because some of the things are the names of the manuscript. So

01:37:06--> 01:37:24

this is not of interest to you, you carry on really believing that this is whole of chapter 16. Am I right? Am I right? That is the common trait of anybody. If I didn't know this, I would accept that this is 16 grammar in English and this is the word of God, this is

01:37:25--> 01:37:26

either this way or that way.

01:37:29--> 01:37:31

But all the trick is in here.

01:37:32--> 01:37:39

Nobody really is expected the commonality, the ordinary mental know what the hell you're talking about. But these people did the job

01:37:45--> 01:37:46

ends at eight.

01:37:47--> 01:37:55

And as a footnote, to the footnote, footnote is not available. It means they're not really

01:37:58--> 01:38:05

other text versions and Mark 1620 the following passage others

01:38:08--> 01:38:10

other ancient authorities and

01:38:12--> 01:38:21

this is not the word of God, this is not in the original manuscripts. The oldest manuscript that they have the Santa Fe head is a little addition

01:38:23--> 01:38:24

to appoint Mr. T because

01:38:28--> 01:38:30

he saw the patients

01:38:32--> 01:38:32


01:38:38--> 01:38:39

Example like a

01:38:41--> 01:38:49

successful angel is to descend and to stay the water of that food

01:38:51--> 01:38:51


01:38:54--> 01:38:55

really get what you're trying to

01:38:57--> 01:38:58

get your point

01:39:01--> 01:39:02

is taken out from

01:39:03--> 01:39:04

this or even if

01:39:08--> 01:39:09

they have taken it out.

01:39:17--> 01:39:19

In this

01:39:24--> 01:39:24

is just

01:39:26--> 01:39:33

not there. Right? It was Linda, and five. Vanessa, chapter

01:39:44--> 01:39:44


01:39:46--> 01:39:46


01:39:48--> 01:39:49

all of a sudden, right.

01:39:57--> 01:39:58

Did you notice

01:40:00--> 01:40:04

before but now, as he said that he didn't, he didn't pay attention to

01:40:07--> 01:40:11

this a nice way down here in a footnote. You have done dishonesty.

01:40:12--> 01:40:17

dishonesty, yeah. But March 16, you're done a dishonest trick.

01:40:18--> 01:40:34

Same thing, what you did here, you should do this thing, he has a footnote. But it's a longer conclusion, shorter conclusion. In other words, that the back of the People's might have been the job, they want to teach you something. from their point of view, they do know that there would be gotten go.

01:40:36--> 01:40:38

Without even in

01:40:39--> 01:40:42

the US Senate version is thrown out as a fabrication

01:40:46--> 01:40:47

that it was called a vise eminence.

01:40:49--> 01:40:51

In your donations, they rejected it, you will quote that

01:40:53--> 01:41:11

suits you when it suits you if you caught that, and you stick by that. But now, if this thing doesn't suit you, because it says now that those who believe Jesus cannot have faith in Him, they will be able to dig up servers and drink personal stuff. same spot for getting onwards.

01:41:14--> 01:41:16

you retain that? So you still play?

01:41:17--> 01:41:21

A lot I congratulate you for calling that texture?

01:41:23--> 01:41:24


01:41:25--> 01:41:28

You can just change it for translation.

01:41:29--> 01:41:29

Does that

01:41:31--> 01:41:32

make sense? Seven to 16 years.

01:41:55--> 01:41:55

Look at

01:41:57--> 01:41:57

this one.

01:41:59--> 01:42:02

This can go out by prayer and fasting.

01:42:09--> 01:42:10

At the back of the mind,

01:42:11--> 01:42:22

subjectively, everybody's going to do a job subjectively. Let me see now I know how I can fit this in how I can I know according to my teachings. So in other words, not the tempering is still going on.

01:42:23--> 01:42:28

By the Jehovah's Witnesses, for example, over 200 cases in interviews with Jehovah in the New Testament,

01:42:32--> 01:42:33

New Testament

01:42:39--> 01:42:43

Christian Greek scriptures and New Testament, we're already talking about

01:42:44--> 01:42:49

the jaws witness have introduced the word Java, ee seven times. Java.

01:42:51--> 01:43:05

Amazing situation, that in the most the oldest manuscripts that you have the word the word does not occur even not including Jesus Christ is quoting when he was questioned masterwork, Oman is the first of all.

01:43:08--> 01:43:27

29 Jesus answered him in the Hebrew language. If Israel speaking Hebrew, I'm sure you saw he was a puppet coming to the Saudis and speaking to them in Afrikaans. Does it make sense? No, don't make sense. The prophets of the Zulus talking to them? Does it make sense? It doesn't make sense to say that

01:43:29--> 01:43:32

Jesus was speaking Hebrew

01:43:33--> 01:43:33


01:43:35--> 01:43:35


01:43:37--> 01:43:37

or Hebrew.

01:43:39--> 01:43:40

So you're

01:43:43--> 01:43:48

talking to the Jews and is quoting what is a coating? is a shimmer is

01:43:52--> 01:43:54

not You have no right.

01:43:56--> 01:43:57

To put a word way that he did not.

01:43:59--> 01:44:09

He said La la la masa Bostonians across, you have no right to say he said Allah, Allah mahtani. You have no I have no right to do that. Although that is

01:44:10--> 01:44:19

to say when Jesus said Allah and Allah Mastani it is it I say he said, Allah, Allah Allah Mata Rani. He says Why did he say he was quoting from the equals?

01:44:22--> 01:44:23

The name of God doesn't

01:44:24--> 01:44:32

matter. But the thing is, is now what he quoted, you have no right to interpose your words. You have to quote them and

01:44:35--> 01:44:35

what was

01:44:37--> 01:44:49

when he's speaking to the people? Did he use the word Jehovah? Probably not because the people were not uttering the word. his nation was not uttering it. As soon as he added it would be a

01:44:51--> 01:44:52

day where

01:44:55--> 01:44:59

Jesus would have corrected me since it is in the book but you people in a traditional church

01:45:00--> 01:45:08

Let me tell you this and that and that he will rectify them. But no, he must have added them to suit, whatever the people were used to.

01:45:10--> 01:45:12

That's how they say today, you

01:45:15--> 01:45:29

know, the Jewish tradition, but you know, the genius don't think that you should I mean, if that tradition, the name of course should not be. That's why it was pointless knows, because you may have for us but it's like back in the 80s.

01:45:35--> 01:45:40

Jesus was. So if he was if he was talking to a people, like if I'm talking to the Jews,

01:45:41--> 01:45:43

I've been talking about the Jews in the temple, David.

01:45:45--> 01:45:49

And then I quoted them the Shama the first commandment.

01:45:53--> 01:45:57

Perfect. He said, you pronounce it better than the Jews because of Arabic

01:45:59--> 01:46:17

language, and I'm trying to pronounce it not trying to. I'm used to Arabic. So my sound is more Arabic, like, it sounds more authentic than what they're used to the westernized Hebrew says no, that's perfect. Nobody says no, you should have read the Java. Nobody says that. So

01:46:18--> 01:46:20

because of your tradition,

01:46:24--> 01:46:44

you speak to me, I can make that an ethical underline. When I speak to you, maybe you can make other an Indian is on the left. I'm speaking English, good English. But there's something about my voice, my tone, everything. This guy's an Indian. This guy is an African. This guy's an Arab I can make out talking English is an Arab.

01:46:47--> 01:46:49

I can make up that you're from Cape Town.

01:46:51--> 01:46:54

Talking English, but I can make out that this guy is a foreigner.

01:46:56--> 01:47:06

You're not trying to you're not trying to talk like a Zulu or like a cassava Swasey or something in your own everything tells me that you are an African,

01:47:08--> 01:47:08


01:47:11--> 01:47:22

indian. So similarly now a Jew, Jewish prophet talkin to the Jews, and he's quoting them the asking what is the first commandment so they're used to hearing Shema Israel?

01:47:25--> 01:47:25

He wasn't

01:47:27--> 01:47:28

able to pick for with him.

01:47:30--> 01:47:36

Why is this like this? You know, all the Pharisees are saying it. I don't I don't I will

01:47:41--> 01:47:55

pronounce it like this, but this is traditional your father so he would have rectified, but there's no rectification. So now even if it was all the meniscus, not a single meniscus has the word Jehovah is a devilish

01:47:56--> 01:48:11

devilish thing for anybody to do that they obliterated the word Jehovah from the 27 books. If the devil can succeed with that, such a simple thing, man. This never succeeded that how many other people can succeeded

01:48:13--> 01:48:16

and succeeded. The most important thing to the Jehovah's Witness is the name.

01:48:17--> 01:48:18

What's his name?

01:48:20--> 01:48:29

What's his name? So I as a Muslim Anthony you? His name is not Jehovah. You see, you say there's a tetragrammaton

01:48:31--> 01:48:31

Ramadan is the

01:48:33--> 01:48:36

6973 times.

01:48:38--> 01:48:49

It was 6823 times before Jo's witnesses to say 6008 and 23. The latest I'm reading now, this is now according to the accounting 6973.

01:48:51--> 01:48:54

There are some other places Lord Lord, Lord, they can say no.

01:48:56--> 01:49:00

So they introduced 66,973 times Java.

01:49:02--> 01:49:03

What is the What is it?

01:49:06--> 01:49:07

What is the tetragrammaton?

01:49:11--> 01:49:14

I'm asking you what this means.

01:49:18--> 01:49:20

Okay, we don't know the meaning.

01:49:24--> 01:49:28

You see, every Tom Dick and Harry among Jehovah's Witnesses. He knows the word tetragrammaton.

01:49:31--> 01:49:33

Illinois University

01:49:34--> 01:49:35

Professor know

01:49:36--> 01:49:38

how many of you know the word tetragrammaton.

01:49:41--> 01:49:44

lecturers and students in the University of Illinois.

01:49:45--> 01:49:46

And it's funny.

01:49:48--> 01:49:59

In every Fountainhead kanheri among Jehovah's Witnesses, they know the word and how is it that you lecturers and university students you don't know the word tetragrammaton what is the tetragrammaton

01:50:00--> 01:50:02

deadlines for newsletters

01:50:04--> 01:50:10

is a four letter word. Now you are using a 14 letter word to describe a four letter word I want to know why.

01:50:12--> 01:50:14

And this is all acceptable.

01:50:26--> 01:50:33

Not 5025 different pronunciation. Mine was speaking anyway Yahuwah I said you see ya

01:50:36--> 01:50:41

in Hebrew, what it means, yeah is evocative an exclamation, meaning.

01:50:43--> 01:50:47

And who are in Hebrew means he and

01:50:48--> 01:50:51

he, who in Arabic means he

01:50:55--> 01:51:03

is he in Hebrew and in Arabic means he. So Yahuwah means literally,

01:51:05--> 01:51:05


01:51:08--> 01:51:09

know him.

01:51:12--> 01:51:19

In Hebrew means God, e l h, Ella, in Hebrew means God.

01:51:20--> 01:51:29

e L, a, h, Allah, in Arabic means God, a l l. A s, in Arabic means God.

01:51:35--> 01:51:36

So what I mean to him

01:51:39--> 01:51:46

is a tool of respect. In Hebrew language. There are two types of tools in Arabic and Hebrew

01:51:48--> 01:51:49

is included.

01:51:51--> 01:51:53

Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is the

01:51:54--> 01:52:16

children of majesty. That's what I'm telling you. This is an Arabic and Hebrew There are two types of tools in other languages is a plural of numbers and a pool of respect. So this is a pool of respect in Arabic and Hebrew you as a Jew, how many Gaza This is one but it says this is a no this is my language dictionary talk like that.

01:52:17--> 01:52:22

Out of respect and all in my language in our native language also.

01:52:24--> 01:52:26

ask you what's your name? Say my name is a

01:52:29--> 01:52:29


01:52:30--> 01:52:36

so you'll ask me every time you come ask me the same. So I don't talk to like that, I will say

01:52:39--> 01:52:41

is what is the meaning of you? or

01:52:42--> 01:52:43

asking what is your name?

01:52:44--> 01:52:45

What is the name of

01:52:47--> 01:52:58

this out of respect? So Anthony, aka Canada, same thing. What do you want to use? Now I'm teaching you how to be respectful. So I use this to you as an ARCA cannon.

01:53:00--> 01:53:01

That has been really tiny.

01:53:02--> 01:53:03


01:53:06--> 01:53:17

what is the name of your old but I don't mean that I mean, what is that name with respect. So you can learn to respect me if you want to know my name, you also see us the same way.

01:53:19--> 01:53:20

name sir Yeah.

01:53:21--> 01:53:26

So, L in Hebrew God, Allah in Hebrew means God.

01:53:28--> 01:53:48

Spirit, la, la ah Allah, nothing wrong, nothing wrong. This is already already right. So now as I know this a lhrc. In the scope revival in the Scofield Bible, he spelled it as a Lh misspelled process Lh

01:53:49--> 01:53:50


01:53:52--> 01:53:56

Eight, DDS is spelled the word God

01:53:57--> 01:53:58

as Ah,

01:53:59--> 01:54:06

I'm telling you is that you write as you like, but pronounce my language the way I want you to say Allah

01:54:07--> 01:54:08

is difficult.

01:54:09--> 01:54:12

If Allah Allah Allah

01:54:13--> 01:54:16

think the zoo Swasey

01:54:27--> 01:54:28


01:54:30--> 01:54:34

mad Lizzy amasi, wah, wah, wah, wah, wah.

01:54:37--> 01:54:38

So, now my son,

01:54:40--> 01:54:41

I want to present you with a camera.

01:54:42--> 01:54:51

You have to come and see me have a cup of tea, because you do drink tea, and like the seven deadly they don't drink tea, they don't drink coke and all that.

01:54:55--> 01:54:59

So, next time you come have a cup of tea with me, and I'm going to present you this book