Hadith Rejection #04
Channel: Adnan Rashid
File Size: 49.99MB
Let 100 Rahim al hamdu Lillah wa salatu salam ala Salam about how do we lie Samira Lima shadow energy was left under him for masala Illa Allah Allah Ameen Colorado lice Allahu alayhi wa sallam are they convinced him that he was not alfalfa Rashid in Alma de embody, oh come upon Allah salatu salam, respected brothers and sisters, we were previously discussing some of the shabiha some of the doubts raised by these rejecters people who reject Hadees whether they reject at least in totality, or they do it, whether they do it partially or whether they do it subtly or openly, we are talking about some of the ideas made public by Hades rejecters. So, we were discussing the issue where some
of these reactors claim that the deal is complete, and because the at least literature was compiled later on, although the reality the origin is early.
It goes back to the time of the Prophet sallallahu sallam, but they claim that it originated late. So that's why it has nothing to do with the deen and we already highlighted our response, we already gave a response in the previous section. Now we will move on to the next point, which is another point how these projectors raise that Hades literature is mainly a viable manner, it has been transmitted in
meaning and not word by word. And that is true.
This literature we have today, the authentic Elise literature, the six books, Bukhari Muslim, without teramachi in synonymous I have no Marja. Even Mr. Mallika, Mata Asana, daarmee. Whatever collection you might pick up, majority of the reports they are in are reported by meaning. In other words, the companions of the Messenger of Allah Azza wa sallam are describing the life of the Prophet, or the words of the prophet in their own wording. So it's mostly paraphrased, the words of the Prophet sallallahu Sallam are paraphrased. So what we look for is the crux, what we look for that is the crux of the matter. So if five companions are reporting the same incident, in different
wording, the conclusion we reach is that the incident definitely took place. There is no doubt because there are five different companions reporting the same incident, right.
reports coming from the from the Prophet sallallahu Sallam word by word of very few in numbers, one of them is for example, Mancha, Zavala, mana Mancha, Vallejo, mata ammidon Felicia Felicia de Beauvoir, Mercado, homina not anyone who lies on me deliberately let him take his seat in hellfire. This is what the professor said word by word. Okay. It has reached us word by word. It is there in our authentic literature. Other reports in Bukhari and Muslim terms even have been reported
in a paraphrased form, Bill manna, and the companions of the Prophet of Islam have reported those
events, incidents or ideas in their own words. So had these rejecters they claim that because this literature is built manner or reliable manner, we cannot fully trust it. But this notion is very erroneous, even according to the Quran, let me explain the game in the Quran. In the Quran, we have stories of the prophets. Yes. Is that true? We have the story of Moses, with the story of Jesus, we have the story of Abraham, we have the story of doubt and Solomon. Now, as far as I know, none of these prophets spoke the Arabic language. Yes, none of these prophets spoke the Arabic language.
And Allah subhanaw taala describes those incidents in the Arabic language where in the Quran so when Allah says we'll call Allah mercy who is sort of Maya, Allah subhanaw taala tells us what Rizal is Ali Salam said to his people who were there, but who is trying, Allah tells us we'll call mercy who Yama Bani Israel or Mandala be back home in Noma, Yoshida cabella facut harem Allahu la Jana, Mama, Mama Mama
Warm up warm welcome.
So hannula forgotten the worst, but
not warm. I mean, I mean, I'm sorry. Yes, that's it. Okay. So Allah tells us that he said his alarm said this will call and mercy you and Allah tells us that Jesus said this. Did Jesus spoke this? Did Jesus speak the Arabic language? No. So we know that Jesus did not use these words. He did not speak the Arabic language. So Allah is paraphrasing the words of he saw a Salam. In other words, so long as you are telling the truth,
and you're not adding details or attributing false information to a profit or someone truthful, then it is okay. Then it is fine. Because this is exactly what a lot is in the Quran. Allah tells us what he saw a salon said, what Moses said what Ibrahim said. What doubt said, Okay, so
Allah subhanaw taala has many incidents in the Quran where Allah paraphrase the words of previous prophets. So if there's a problem with that, why is there a problem with companions of the Messenger of Allah, Allah salam, paraphrasing the words of rasulillah salam, and in the end, they would qualify themselves. They would say, oh, come up, Paul. Ali salatu salam that the Prophet sallallahu Sallam said something like this.
He said something like this. For example, if as a hobby, if a companion of the Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Sallam if a disciple of Muhammad Sallallahu sallam, he attributes information to the prophet and he says that Kala Rasulullah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam law you know, I had to come hotta you have barely AHIMA you're humble enough to he, oh, come upon Allah salatu salam, they would state a report from the Prophet Allah Salaam, that the prophets Allah said this. And then in the end, the Sahabi, or the companion or the disciple of the Islam would say, oh, come upon Allah salatu salam, he said something like this, to qualify himself to save himself from an error, right? So when
five or 10 companions of the Prophet of Islam are reporting the same thing, then it becomes absolutely certain that this report or this particular narration is definitely authentic, as far as the the main details are concerned, right. So revival manner is absolutely trustworthy, especially when you have multiple attestation when you have multiple companions saying the same thing, okay, so there is nothing wrong with that. So that was the response. Now coming to the Persian conspiracy
point on Persian conspiracy. Some of these rejecters they claim that at least literature was collected by a bunch of conspirators
who were originally Persian
and they were a bunch of storytellers and liars. And because they were so used to telling stories about a rough term and no shadow one and that's when they are and these Persian fables of the past. They knew how to forge these new stories about the promise of the salon, and they attributed the stories to the prophet and spread them. This is the the joy Hill and ignorant and absolutely erroneous notion of storytelling, the spread these projectors, I'm talking about desperate about the Hades literature.
Anyone who studies the nice science, even on a basic level on the primary level, will come to realize that it would be impossible, it would be impossible for one to forge a lie about the prophets Allah Salam
at that time and not get caught.
How do you know people got caught? Because we have been told by them at the scene that people were lying on the prophet and we caught them cellulitis they were lying on the profits a lie Solomon, we caught them.
So what these people do is they the people that called Iranian conspirators, are the ones who are actually catching thieves. So imagine if a thief runs into your house and you catch him, and then people can come from outside and they say,
the thief is a thief, and you're also a thief. Because we're the one who caught him. Whether I'm telling you the thief.
Now, because he's in your house, you caught him, you're also a thief. Or imagine the police catches a thief. Police catches a thief and you go to the police reserve.
You're also a thief, right? Although it may be
In many cases in Pakistan, yeah.
But generally, in other places, it's not true. Okay. So the policeman will say to you hold on a second, hold on a quarter. I'm the one who's telling you is a thief. So, this is what these people
who have who are completely void of justice Unfortunately, they are telling them the scene that you are the thieves. They are killing mohabbatein people who collected the Sunnah of the Prophet sallallahu Sallam that you are the thieves. Amazing, amazing standards, okay. And this is what Allah subhanaw taala addresses in the Quran. Allah says a couple of columns on taco Divina, for him in your coluna, illa katiba. That they lie. They spread nothing but lies. Okay. These people have these rejecters about great personalities. We haven't made these stories up. These are the scene who gave sacrifices and who had very diligent criteria to accept these reports on certain people. And when
they doubted someone's character, liars were out of the question.
Anyone who is known to have lied or who was known to have lied, once in his life was never accepted as a Hades narrator for the Hadees collectors.
Anyone who had other weaknesses in his character was also not accepted as these narrator someone who had weak memory someone who was known to have mixed reports with each other out we don't, we cannot take a risk. This is how the Madison read treated people.
If people were known to have had mixed reports
once one mistake is enough for them on the scene for people like Imam Bukhari Imam Muslim a mama without
a mama Shafi, if you are known once, to have made a mistake, you would be not not you're not written off from Islam, you may be a very good Muslim,
but you cannot give us the Hadees literature we will not take it from you. Because we cannot risk we cannot take a risk on our Deen. This is how diligent they were in collecting Hades magazine, or the low Nomad mine. May Allah be pleased with them. And we'll accept their efforts. And most people who accuse them of this erroneous idea that they were conspirators or they were collecting
just piles of literature, piles of stories, and they were just attributing these stories without checking them to the prophets, Allah salam, how can you claim that?
Especially when you haven't studied the science of Hades, it is absolutely appalling to claim something like that. And we will show how, first of all, the fact that when they claim that these are the scene, most of them were Persian, and this was a Persian conspiracy to corrupt Islam from within, hence that this literature, this idea in itself is false. Because most of the major magazine, the first narrators who were there, who were they the first narrators were the companions of the Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu sallam, they will, if not all, majority, the overwhelming majority of them were Arabs. They were from the Arabian Peninsula, right.
And then main narrators are after them. who were there. Mr. mazari.
Mr. mazari Mr. unsaved been Masaya automobiles Zubair, Omar bin Abdulaziz, these people, right, Who were they? They were Arabs. They were all Arabs. Okay. So they are the ones who took Hadees from the companions of the Messenger of Allah some erworben Zubair Who was he?
Who was he?
opens Where was he? He was the son of suburbanite, one.
Okay, and also a nephew of eyeshadow de la Juana. That's why he narrated so much for my share of the Aloha orwa was a nephew of Elijah. So he was very close to Ayesha kala, she was his color. So he would go to her and take these from him, I'm sorry to come over. Right. And then him I'm sorry, gave two later people. Mr. Malik, for example, who was also an Arab. Mr. maryk took from NAFTA. Now there was a direct student and a servant of Abdullah bin Omar, an Arab Abdullah bin Omar was a companion of Rasulullah sallallahu sallam. And Malik gave her these two of the love and use of
another man of the love and use of what the teacher of Imam Bukhari where's the line
Where's the Persian controversy? Where's the Imam Bukhari was not Persian by the way? Mr. Bahari was from maharana hora transec, Sania
transics. Sania is basically beyond the river oxus Land Beyond the river oxes which is Central Asia today. He was on Bukhara which is a notebook is done, right. So, it was not
strictly speaking pleasure.
So, Mr. Mohammed humble Mr. Mousavi, both Arabs, Mr. Malik
was from the tribe of us.
A mom Chavez he was Qureshi, a mom having to humble was from the tribe of Shea barn. Okay. And it was the tribe of shavon. Amazingly, now, this is where the, the, the error of these people the ignorance of these people is who claimed this Persian conspiracy
in the form of Hades literature, at least rejecters amazingly, who is the Mudhar, the center of Hades literature in Iraq, in Baghdad in the second century Hijri. Who is it?
Mr. Ahmed bin humbug
Imam Ahmed bin humble is the main one of the main not the beginning one of the main teachers of Addison Bhagat, from the tribe of Shea barn
and to this day, which had his book is the largest collection of Hades.
say Bukhari, anyone else? Anyone else? It is most known of Mr. Muhammad
the Muslim Ummah, Muhammad is the largest collection of Hadees available to us today.
And Mr. Muhammad was one of the teachers of remember Hardy. He was also one of the teachers around without ultra Muslim they were contemporaries. It was the idea of Mr. Muhammad to filter out the most authentic literature,
making sure that we have one or two authentic collections of the some of the policies, some that cannot be doubted. Not even 1% doubt should be on them. Right? Because they are the ones who started catching thieves.
Mr. Mohammed was the policeman. He was the policeman he was the Inspector General of Police literature.
He was the man who was appointed to catch Thief by Allah subhanaw taala and he started to catch thieves. And then he realized that the treasure the purity of the treasure, just come khazana get your domain. Yeah khazana is his car.
is key to purity.
karlskoga Daniel de McCauley Sienna, Ha
khazanah duet. This treasure. This purity is in danger due to the thieves
due to the thieves
because these may be preying fake gems into the treasure, fake gems
or Ruby. That looks like an original Ruby is thrown into a treasure. A pilot treasure. How are you going to separate it?
How are you going to separate it? Only a jury? Only a jeweler or a gems expert can separate it right Do you agree?
Recently my father bought a Ruby and is very happy about it.
And it was a big Ruby yet.
And it looks so beautiful. It's so clear. I said you know what? It looks and I'm not a gem gems expert. I said you know what looks too good to be true.
It looks too good to be original. I cannot believe such a big Ruby such a clear Ruby can be for such 7000 rupees.
Manga SATA Lara Peggy ously Ruby multi Jenna
igos nine as Leah
so we took it to the gem gem experts. They said by savvy shisha
This is glass. They said this is glass. Someone has robbed you. Right. So am I'm humble was that Inspector, that policeman appointed by Allah to God, the treasure of the Sunnah and when people were throwing started trying to throw
Fake gems inside the treasure to compromise its purity. He appointed other policemen just cook I didn't know free Balado Pakistan is one Mega 10 Jamba treads. Have you gotten a free burrito? Please get a free brother is silly, okay to just say oh, they're so dumb again. So please guide me at the border check, you're gonna get everybody up here. So increase the numbers of Gods
lock the treasure and increase the number of Gods so that thieves cannot throw in fake gems.
It's not about taking gem from the treasure. It's not about that it's about mixing or,
you know, compromising the purity of the treasure. We want to keep this treasure pure.
So he said increase the number of Gods say mama humble Bukhari Muslim Mambo Tao si tenemos z darkwood name later on.
In the course Mr. IGNOU of the bar. bookkeeping McCullough in Spain, in London, Mr. Mohammed student, Allahu Akbar, you name it one after another gods are arising and they are protecting the Sunnah of the messenger or several Kenji, do you think this is a joke? This science is a joke. Do you think it was collected and put together by random guys who thought Oh, this Oh, this looks nice. So we'll put it in the collection? No, no. They scrutinized every single Narrator In the chain every single man.
And the point I want to make is that this Inspector General, Mr. Mahajan humble was from Blue Shea barn. So if it was a Persian conspiracy,
blue Shea barn was the tribe that was on the front line fighting the Persians.
militarily when the Muslims
in the time of their loved one, you know which tribe was on the frontline fighting the Persians
bonucci bond. And even in the second century, if anything, it has been O'Shea bond, a man from Blue shavon, Shay Bonnie, am I'm humble a Shay Barney yet is defending the son of the Messenger of Allah. So
if there are any per unit attacks, but there were none, this notion was actually
introduced by ignaz Goldgeier in the 19th century, and some of these projectors to sound cool or to look cool, or to come across intellectuals, as intellectuals or to or to look like educated people, they start to to adopt these theories. And you know what, most of them haven't studied the science of these. It is very clear. So, having clarified that, Imam Bukhari was from takistan, maharana har, he was not Persian.
Mr. Mo doubt, is, he came from Saudi Stan, which was not strictly speaking part of Persia. Okay.
And Mr. Timothy was, again,
Tim is today you can I think he's in Iran. But at that time, it wasn't strictly speaking part of Persia. And then we look at the names of some of the major authorities of Hades, who are directly responsible for collecting Hadith literature from earlier generation. And then generation before that, which was the debate and then as Harborough. So who are these people, Mr. Malik, Mr. Malik, he collected one of the first collections of Hades called alma
mater. Okay, who was Malik when he plays? You know, he was from the US. Okay. his tribe was called the US bar. He was an Arab, he was an Arab, he died in 179. He was born in 94. He
lyerly and in fact, between him and a companion of the Messenger of Allah sallallahu sallam, how many people how many? One man now for nothing, okay, then a mama shopfully Emma Shafi what he he died in 204. He he was a direct student of Imam Malik
Imam Khomeini died in 219 Hijri Qureshi among his haak been Rockaway borough Tamim died in 238 Hijri, a teacher of Imam Bukhari. Mr. His Hawker away was when the teachers of Imam Bukhari from below Tamim Imam Ahmed humble as we have discussed, who died in 241 he Bhanu shavon
Imam daarmee doremi who died in 255 veggie burrito meme Mr. Muslim 261 hungry but no fresh air okay.
Mr. Mahmud out
to 7580 years from
now you may be thinking a man who was from Saudi Stan, Saudi stanny is also is known as Abu Tao, the study study. Okay. Now this doesn't mean that he was actually originally from Saudi Stan Stan is basically close to Balochistan this this region. Okay.
keep in mind that when the Islamic conquest took place, a lot of the Arabs resettled in these conquered lands. Does that make sense? Right. And these Arabs became Persian ized they became Persian ized. So they were originally Arabs, but they had also learned the Persian language and adopted some of the Persian culture, but they were actually Arabs. And one example is a mama without who was born in Saudi Stan, but he was actually originally from us and Arabian tribe. The mom Timothy was also again born very close to Persian territory pyramids. Okay. Again, he was from the Arab Arabic origin. He was from Vanessa lane. Harris among Horace Mann Usama who died in 282. He
borrowed Tamim mm abubaker bizarre, okay, who died in 292 Hijri. Ben was among Abu Yala, Mr. mabuya Allah from Baku, Tamim. Gaiden 307 Mr. Abu Jaffa Javi Javi. Okay. You know, Akita Taha via,
you know, Aki La Jolla. We read Akira Talia was written by compiled by Yamamoto how he Mamata Javi also the author of sharp, muscular lofar Okay, this big compendium of book I mean, I'm going to come to address this point. So remember, remember the name Mr. Mojave? Okay. He died in 2021. But he was also an Arab Imam ignore a ban. burrito meme. Okay, Mr. McCabe Ronnie Bonilla, okay. Ma'am, Hakeem Baba. Okay. And those who are attorneys,
mainly some of the major magazine who are atomies non Arabs were Mr. Ebner Ba Ba, the author, the compiler of masala for Wagner. ba ba. Okay, Mr. mcquarry. Also, what non Arab? Mr. Hebrew Marja was also non Arab. Okay, Mr. Nakajima was non Arab. So major authorities have had these, the majority of them were Arabs. So this Persian conspiracy theory in itself is a conspiracy. You understand? This Persian conspiracy theory on the part of these rejecters in itself is a conspiracy to cast doubt on how this literature In fact, there's a book I strongly recommend
by ship zelle been sloppy.
It has been published from avantgarde, India, and it is called skeletal mohabbatein. Okay, it is in two volumes. And it covers the history of the scene from the second century. In fact, the first century to the eighth century history. Okay, read these two these two volumes. I mean, see majority of them are the same major authorities were mostly Arabs, okay.
Let's assume that these people who claim the Persian army conspiracy to corrupt the RMB, religion and Islam, okay, who are these people who are claiming this conspiracy? Who are these people? they themselves are dummies. They themselves are dummies. purveys purveys, the founder of pervasive Africa. Who was he? Was he an Arab?
army? Java, the Gandhi, although he saw is from Gandhi tribe. I don't know if that tradition is correct or not. Yeah. I can't call him but by culture, by upbringing, his argument, right? He may be originally Arab because Gandhi Gandhi's zaldy tribe, it is an Arabian tribe, okay. Who are these people?
they themselves have been affected by an army conspiracy, or army
another question I want to ask is, why did it take the Persians so long to come up with this conspiracy? If it's a conspiracy?
Why did take them two, three centuries, right? And all the Muslim scholars or deaf, dumb and blind for the last 14 centuries, they had no idea that this conspiracy had happened. They were all sleeping. And suddenly, these these rejecters pseudo intellectuals woke up in the 19th century.
And beyond and realize that there was a Persian Cosmos the OLAP Islam your Persian
egg, you have Farsi Saudis crazy caraga right. Islamic Farsi sausage Kashi caraga Islamic a burger Korea Farsi army, right? In quads, Covina, Zulu, he only sees the mayor or basis or the mayor, they have come to realize which ledger mode is in the sub bill called farik theory, they had no idea what was happening with them in the history, they are not. So this is why refer back to our first lecture where I said, one of the biggest causes of police reaction is actually absolute ignorance of the science of police.
And the history of Hades, and the history of the murder scene, and the history of the men who underrating Hades. This is the biggest reason why people become police rejecters because they assume that it is just me, you've come to me, Mrs. Obama is just, you know, random knowledge that was collected by Madison on ad hoc basis, it wasn't like that it was systematic, was very organized, it was very, very delicate, was very, very intricate work with the magazine did. And the details can only be known when you study a basic book on the science of Hades.
So they claim
and the conspiracy amazingly, only happened in Persia, it didn't happen in London, it didn't happen in North Africa. It didn't happen in India, it didn't happen in northern China or Central Asia, it only had to happen in Persia as if the scene only existed in Persia or Iraq or in that region or Asia or DC near. So, this is another erroneous idea they come up with.
Then finally, next point, we will address inshallah is
clash in some of the authentic reports. This is another idea that bring up these projectors, that because these literature is contradictory, a lot of the reports are in contradiction. So we cannot accept it. Right? But they're not actually in contradiction. It is impossible for an authentic report to contradict another It is impossible. Okay. And where there is a direct contradiction, it is an issue to do with NASA and monceau which can be found in the Quran. If your own if you are Quran, only Muslims, then the contradictions you are claiming and these also exist in the Quran, then be consistent, then apply the same criteria, same standard to the Quran, because there are
verses in the Quran that apparently contradict other verses, apparently, apparently, not. Those are actually not contradictions. Those are aggregations.
Okay. For example, the Koran says yeah, are you under Deena armano la takanobu Sala Quantum sakara? Yes. Oh, you believe Do not come near a prayer when you are drunk. Then in other words, Allah says, Yeah, are you Hello Dina hamano in namale kamaru wall maizuru vollen savall Islam register minimally shaitan fujitani boo La La come to flare own a man well Oh, you believe abstain from intoxicants, gambling, throwing arrows for luck. Okay, these are actions of shape on here. Wine is haram. The other verses saying do not come close to Salah when you are drunk.
So how you going to reconcile the reconciliation is that the first verse was revealed in the early days of Islam when hombre was not made Haram. Wine was forbidden by Allah subhanaw taala gradually, so the final verse abrogated all other verses. Now the verse or you believe do not come in a prayer when you are drunk, doesn't apply.
It doesn't apply anymore, it is abrogated. It is there.
It is abrogated.
Subhana Allah. So likewise, in these literature, we have authentic reports abrogating other authentic reports. For example, the sort of law says don't give a ruling in the early days of Islam then later on it will never get it where there is clear cut on the same metric issue.
Other examples are
that Rasul Allah says Allah gave answers to two different individuals on the same matter, but the answers are different.
For example, a man came in off the premises alone, about something. One ounce of it was given, another man came another answer was given. So there's contradiction, right? These people claim a contradiction. No, there's no contradiction, because the people he answered to were requiring different answers. For example, one man came, and he asked a messenger of Allah says, Allah, for example,
about fasting, in a way it has something to do with intimacy with wife, can I
be physical without being fully intimate? Can I be physical and my wife? And I sort of lost our son said to one, No, you can't.
Another man came. And he asked the same question the promises and said, Yes, you can. Okay, and then hold on a second, why two answers. One was a young man. And the danger is that when he will start a little, he will go all the way. It is very likely young man's passions or a reason. He is intimate with his wife. It starts with a with a with a with a hug or something and then while you're fasting, it goes all the way right. And then you broke your fast Yes, with an old man who is more able to possibly control his emotions and his desires, it is okay for him. So this is to do with circumstances, it is not a contradiction. It is a ruling that applies a different different ruling
applies to different people, right. So there are many examples like that. And to understand this concept, Mr. Motta Javi, the one I mentioned earlier, Mr. Mojave, he has written a compendium and encyclopedia on reconciliation of similar reports such report, it is called shore mosquito Lothar. Okay. It is a big giant book in many volumes, multiple volumes. It is called Shara mosquito Lothar. And it is compiled by Mr. Mojave, who explains that those reports that sound or seem problematic are actually not problematic. It is your lack of understanding your lack of knowledge of the of the Arabic language or your lack of knowledge of the history or the circumstances of these reports. So
Mr. Motta Javi he reconciles all these reports in this big Compendium this encyclopedia.
But ask these people these these rejecters if they have bothered to pick up pick up Mr. Motta, hobbies, reconciliations, or this big giant book, which was written quite early on, was Richard written in the fourth century of Islam fourth century history. So this is another
issue. Last point I want to discuss today inshallah, very quickly before we go to q&a, because it's been very long.
One of the reasons to not trust Hades literature is that because it was compiled a lot later. Okay. We This is a very common
argument. And it's a classical argument, or classic argument, at least rejecters present, even some
missionaries, Christian missionaries come up with this idea. Some atheists also come up with this idea that Oh, what should Why should we trust Hades, it was compiled so late. And you guys are inconsistent. you reject the Gospels of Jesus Christ, gospel of john, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, because they were written later on. Okay? And look at these.
These collections. They were written a lot later than the gospels were written from Jesus Christ. So how can you accept these literature and reject the Gospels? So very, very valid argument to those who have no knowledge of history and theology? Right? It is a very powerful a powerful argument, isn't it? Huh? Listen, when you actually go in depth, and when you drill the argument or when you dissect the argument to come to realize it is fallacious. It is fallacious for example, gospels were written by anonymous people.
They were anonymous, unknown McGraw Hill devil module in Hades literature, when a Hadees comes to Omaha this collector of Hadees for example, Imam Bukhari or Imam haven't been humble. If this comes from the Prophet sallallahu sallam, it has been reported or it has been attributed to the prophet and one of the men in the chain is unknown. For example, for example, the rest of the chain is known. It's nothing okay we know who nefarious is Abdullah bin Omar we know Abdullah bin amorous but after NaVi there is a man who is not known. The Mojave scene are not aware
His history, his circumstances his character, where he taught what kind of character personality was he such a report, however beautiful it may sound, however attractive the report may be okay will be thrown on the wall
any Hadees that has an unknown character in the chain will be thrown on the wall will not be accepted. So, your comparison between the Gospels and at least literature is completely misplaced and inconsistent
and non applicable. Why? Because Hades literature has been preserved from a well known sources
and every single man in the chain is known to us. I'll give you a very quick examples. So when Imam Bukhari puts down a report in his collection,
that Rasulullah sallallahu Sallam said such and such so and so he gives his sources Buhari is almost two centuries apart from the Prophet sallallahu Sallam right or wrong. two centuries apart, more than two centuries apart from the puzzles are harder because you know what the prophet said? How does he know what the prophet said or did right. Know Buhari cites his sources. Buhari tells us there are reports in Buhari and there are 22 in number 22 reports in Buhari they have three men between the prophet and Buhari three, three men between Buhari and the Prophet Bukhari generates from his teacher
mckeeva NaVi Rahim Hoon the rates from his teacher is even over your baby. And you see the blue awaiting the rich narrate from his teacher Salma Gabrielle Aqua, who was a companion of the Prophet salallahu alaihe salam.
And then Salma, Tommy laquanda rates from the Prophet five men Prophet said Salma took it and then gave it to the reader globally obeyed when Salma was in his 70s you see the blue over your wait gave the report to mckibbon ob Brahim when he was in his 80s Okay, and of sound mind and Maki gave it to Mr. Buhari, but McKee was an old man. So Imam Bukhari he took reports directly from sources who go back to the Prophet uninterrupted as a chain. It doesn't stop there. There are reports since al Bukhari that have four men between Bukhari and the Prophet. So Buhari generates from his teacher of the love and use of all knowledge from him Mr. Mr. Malik, Malik Merritt from nothing, nothing the
rest of the Leben Omar Abdullah bin Omar narrates from
Prophet sallallahu sallam. Then we have book and reports in Bukhari with five men between Bukhari
and rasulillah salam, then we have a report that has six men between body so change sometimes get longer depending on where the report came from, or sometimes they get shorter.
Okay, so every single report must
come with a chain. Anything that comes without a chain will be rejected. So there is no comparison between the Gospels and the Hadees literature. gospels are completely anonymous. We don't know who Matthew, Mark and Luke and john were were, we don't know who these people were. So if we don't know who they were, why are we even believing what they're saying?
It is claimed that they were disciples of Jesus Christ, it is impossible to prove that it is impossible to prove that we call it in the science of Hades in Qatar interruption of sources interruption of sources we call it in the science of Hades in Kappa Okay, when there is in Kappa in the chain
then that chain is completely rejected. That report is not accepted. It is dive it is not authentic, it is not trustworthy. We are the ones telling you that at least study it. So
Hades literature was first of all not written later on. It was written within the first century okay. There is a HIPAA of what had been what have been Manabe okay. And there are there are other people of the law. One of the companions are solo so he was allowed to write his name is Abdullah bin Ahmed been asked, he was allowed to write the Hadith of the prophets of Salaam. He was an exception, because prophets also did not want his companions to mix the Quran with the Hadees so at least was memorized. It was internalized verbally orally, the Quran was penned down it was written down later on when the Quran was created.
pile in his current form by abubaker enough mundo de la Juana mine on homage mine, then the Sahaba they started to encourage the students to write down hobbies as well. And in the time of tabi rain or these were written down and by the time we get to Mr. Malik, he is already compiling Mattila Malik
and we still have manuscripts of what Imam Malik from his lifetime. There is a proprietary manuscript, which dates back to the life of Mr. Malik and it is marked Imam Malik Malik was born in 94. He was one of the companions of a sort of Lazarus was alive. And it's been Malik we don't know whether unus was alive and Malik was born. But it was the same year when Moloch was born and has died or their loved one it was so close and Moloch is the one of the first compilers of a collection of Hadees. So, this is enough said on this matter, the headings literature was compiled later on. Hence, it is not trustworthy, a lot more can be said on this topic, but I do not have the time to
give the details at this stage. inshallah I'll move on. And in fact,
one last point I want to address is the issue of erroneous or
controversial content in the Hardee's literature, for example, okay, or there are things about the profits in these rich literature that cannot be accepted. For example, in Makati, we have a report that
Ibrahim is thought to have stated non factual things. Right. Three non factual statements being made. Okay. There is a report in Bahati, by the way, the term kid,
kid in the Arabic language doesn't always mean a lie. It means a non factual statement. For example, once I showed the loved one ha,
you know, heard Abdullah bin Omar saying something about the province of Southern she said candybar
of the law. Okay, my Bella lied. If you translate that into English, it would be translated as Abdullah lied. But is Ayesha actually saying Abdullah bin Omar is lying, or is a liar? No. She's saying Abdullah bin Omar is mistaken. He's stating something non factual.
Okay, she's not calling him a liar. So the Arabic language is very important for you to understand. So when the word kid is used in the Arabic language, it doesn't always mean a lie. It means a lie, but doesn't always mean a lie. It can mean a non factual statement. So when these these projectors talk about this hadith in Bukhari, or Ibrahim Alayhi, salam, he had said, non factual things. For example, he said to his people, I am sick, I cannot go with you. And then he broke the idols. And when they came back, he said, the big either broken, which is a non factual statement, right? You can call it a lie. So, but Ibrahim al Islam was deliberately making these non factual statements to
make them think, to make them think he wasn't actually lying. And in fact, two examples are in the Quran. Two of these examples are in the Quran. So why don't you go to the Quran as well using the same criteria. So if you attack the Hades for some
controversial to do to you, not to us, to you some controversial content, then go to the Quran as well. There's plenty of controversy there as well, if you want to use that standard. It doesn't
necessarily follow that your argumentation is valid for Hadith literature, so they can give many more examples of intellectual impossibilities
in the Hadith literature, intellectual impossibilities, one of those examples is probably Maha masala marrying, I shadowed your loved one Hmm. Now these people that think like this, because they have been affected by modern liberal secular thought process they have been affected by if you go back to history 19th century backwards 19th century backwards as I clarified, most humans on the planet, we're getting married to girls, as young as 910 1112 910 1112 910 1112. Don't believe me? Go and read a book on the age of consent written by any European scholar. google it, Google it.
age of consent in the West. Before the 19th century, you will get maybe tons of articles and read the quotes of scholars and they will tell you in
societies before the 19th century, it was not an issue as soon as girls Reach, reach the age of puberty as soon as girls
puberty, which was determined by menstruation, when they had their menstrual cycles, they were ready for marriage. They were concerned. As far as those societies were concerned, they were ready for marriage. I'm not saying that should happen today. Times have changed. People have changed the thinking of change, the feelings have changed. People have been affected by the the norm that prevails in the world today. So I'm not saying that should happen today. I'm saying what happened in the past, it was the norm for them. In the past, it was the norm. As soon as a girl reached the age of puberty, when she had menses, she was ready for marriage for them in the past. Okay, so these
people, these are these rejecters they have no idea. They don't know about the history. That's why when they read that in Bukhari, the police are seldom married, I shadowed your loved one when she was nine, right? They get a shock.
So, if she had had her periods at that time, if she had menstruated, or if she had reached the the marriageable age, or puberty at that time,
and according to their social norms, it was okay to get a girl married. When she reaches that age, in fact, there are reports in Kamikaze bin Zod that aboubaker the father of Ayesha came to the Prophet salla salaam,
and told him to take Ayesha into your house. She's ready.
Ayesha is ready, my daughter is ready Ready for what? ready for work. She's ready to be your wife. Why what determined that readiness, what determined that readiness, it was obviously either her menstrual cycles, or her physical appearance or physical ability to them to those societies. In the past, it was the norm, as late as the 19th century, some of the American states or you listen to me brothers, brothers, sisters, as late as the 19 as late as 1920s.
Less than a century ago, less than a century ago, some of the American states in the south, they allowed girls to get married as young as 12 1112 depending on even 10, even 10 depending on which state it is
as late as the 1920s.
So if these had these projectors were alive in the 1920s they wouldn't have this. This question wouldn't be bugging the mind.
as the boss said,
Tara, Jude sarafa jolly Frank, good to walk Mr. gurgi hatami
kadowaki Mara garaga Tommy's.
And I will end the lecture today, we have finally by the grace of Allah subhanaw taala.
Complete completed our treatment of Hades rejection,
and hopefully people have benefited
in the future, we might do more extensive lengthier lectures on this topic if necessary, if questions come up can come across, if people are asking questions for us to address them inshallah, we will go further into detail, but I believe anyone reasonable, anyone who is
blessed with common sense and firm knowledge of history and theology and these literature will find these lectures convincing and will possibly,
inshallah, follow the Sunnah of Rasulullah sallallahu Sallam if he or she is a Heidi's rejecter so those of you who are these projectors whether you are subtle Heidi's objectors or open these projectors are passionate, these projectors are complete these projectors. This was our love for you. This is this was not a hateful exercise rather. This will this will this was our love
for you and you should accept it as a loving gesture on our part is Akuma lokeren wha Hello Davina and in hamdu Lillahi Rabbil aalameen