Tom Facchine – Islam & Human Rights

Tom Facchine
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the history and implementation of human rights, including the concept of "immateriality," which is the ability to see things in one's own way. They explore the concept of property and consciousness, marriage, and how it can lead to negative consequences. They emphasize the importance of choice and creating human beings, while also acknowledging the negative consequences of marriage and the importance of avoiding extreme behavior. The speakers stress the need to be mindful of what is happening in the world and to not consume too much refrain.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:28
			If you look into the history of human rights, where it came from, what are the ideas behind it, that
it is not universal, it does not apply to everybody. And it actually has assumptions about who human
beings are, that contradict our theme. Today, we're talking about Islam and human rights. And it's
very relevant because in the football, we talked, when we brought up some situations that have been
happening around the country and around North America, where the idea of human rights is being
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:37
			it's being called upon for certain ends, right? So recall that the situation we had
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:47
			people, young folks in the schools, Muslims being forced to learn certain things about gender and
sexuality that completely contradicts our deen.
		
00:00:48 --> 00:01:25
			And then, when we are even trying to do the bare minimum, which is to opt out of it, to not be
there, we're being told that we're violating somebody's human rights, that they have the human right
to be affirmed that they have the human right to be recognized and celebrated. And if we do not,
then they are erased, and it might be a form of violence against them. How do we get here? Right?
It's very loaded language. That's what we're going to try to unpack today. Because human rights
means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. And if when we disentangle it, we're
gonna see what lies at the very, very bottom of it.
		
00:01:27 --> 00:01:39
			Somebody asked me one time they said, you know, when I talk to I talk to people, I like to tell them
that I'm, I like to talk to them on the level of humanity first before I talk about being on the
level of Islam.
		
00:01:40 --> 00:02:18
			And my response to that was, well, why on earth would you do that? Because when you talk to people,
they say, I'm a human being, you're a human being, it seems like you have something in common. But
the trouble is, nobody can agree about what that actually means. It's true. Everybody is part of the
human race, quote, unquote, the species, whatever we want to call it. But how do we interpret that
fact? What does it mean that I'm a human being, you're a human being the devils in the details, as
we say, and that's what nobody can agree upon. Because if you've got a hard materialist over here,
who doesn't believe in anything except survival of the fittest, the fact that you're a human being
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:54
			and I'm a human being, it only means that we're in competition with another with one another, it
only means that you are my potential enemy. When you consume that means one less for me, when you
take something, it means one less for me. And some of the brothers who know the street life around
here, they understand that that's the mentality that a lot of people have. Being Human doesn't get
you anywhere with somebody else. You say, Hey, I'm human, too. Nobody cares. That guy is gonna try
to * your girls * your watch, * or whatever he can. He doesn't care that you're
human. Right? However, if we relate to people through our deen through Islam, then we have very,
		
00:02:54 --> 00:03:23
			very clearly spelled out things and we'll get to that, we'll get to that inshallah. So one person
can say, hey, I'm a human, you're a human being. And they can interpret that in the way of saying,
well, that means that we're enemies, just that somebody else can say the same thing. You and I are
both human beings, we should have some sort of sympathy for one another, we should have rights that
we recognize from one another. And there's no way for either of these two sides to have any
conclusive sort of solutions to their problems, and to see which one is right.
		
00:03:24 --> 00:04:03
			If you look around the world, and you see the way that human rights is being used, just like the
case we saw that we talked about today, there's other situations where we see the human rights is
called upon to step in, in certain cases where the scenarios are completely opposite. So if you go
to France, and we have our Muslim sisters in France, who can't wear the hijab, or can't wear the
niqab, that it's actually illegal to do it in public, or in public buildings, or in universities or
in government buildings, or things like that. Right. Some people they say this is a violation of
human rights. But then if we go on another part of the world to Iran, right, where the laws are
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:44
			different. Now, there are women who are ripping off their hijabs and they're saying that this is
also our human rights. So on one part of the globe, we're saying that human rights is to put it on
another part of the globe, we're saying it's human rights to take it off. How does this make sense?
It makes sense if you go into the history of what human rights is, and the the idea here and the
hope here, I'm gonna try to break it down for you. That if you look into the history of human
rights, where it came from, what are the ideas behind it, that it is not universal? It does not
apply to everybody. And it actually has assumptions about who human beings are, that contradict our
		
00:04:44 --> 00:04:48
			deen. And this is important for where we come to to get today with the things that we mentioned in
the book.
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:59
			You have to understand that we live in the United States of America. United States of America has a
certain cultural inheritance from Europe. And if you want to
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:32
			zonin on one thing, or focusing on one thing that defines the European experience, it is a traumatic
experience with Christianity. Europe as a continent had a traumatic experience with Christianity.
The Catholic Church would institute inquisitions would try to determine what do you believe? Do you
believe in the right thing, if not, we're gonna burn you at the stake. If not, we're going to kill
you, we're going to persecute you. And they did this all over. They did this for a long time.
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:49
			And then what happened? Once the Catholic Church lost its monopoly on power, and it lost its
monopoly on the right to interpret the religion and to be the only game in town. When it came to
Christianity, there came a huge pushback in the other direction.
		
00:05:51 --> 00:06:32
			This is what's known as a movement called the enlightenment and the Enlightenment in European
philosophy. They attempted to replace the order and the guidance that the Catholic Church had given
Europe. But they attempted to do it without religion, to completely try to sidestep religion
entirely. They thought that if they could find a universal culture, based off of what they call
universal reason, that we will be able to fix all problems that society had all misunderstandings,
all disagreements, war would stop, poverty would stop hunger would stop, everything would stop. So
this was their main goal. And they said, they set out to do this. But how would they be able to
		
00:06:32 --> 00:06:42
			communicate to people and educate people as to what they were entitled to, or why somebody shouldn't
attack somebody else to steal their resources or to steal what they have?
		
00:06:44 --> 00:07:06
			They came up with the idea of human rights. They said that the one thing that we all have in common
is that we're human beings. And if human beings exercise their reason, they think about it hard
enough, they will see that is in their own benefit, to treat each other with respect to not harm
each other, et cetera, et cetera.
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:53
			But problem is, the problem is, when you when they attempted to do this, this idea of human rights,
they couldn't avoid making certain assumptions about which human being that we're talking about. How
do we define what a human being is? Where is a human being destined to go? What is their purpose in
life, all these different things. And this is actually really significant and important, because if
you have a difference of opinion, about what it means to be human, then the rights that you think
that that person is entitled to is going to be completely different. If you think that a human being
is just a bunch of cells, a sack of cells, that's going to die and then be worm food. And that's it.
		
00:07:54 --> 00:08:35
			No afterlife, no heaven, no *, you're going to think that human beings are entitled to a certain
set of rights. But if you think that there is such a thing as a soul, if you think that there is
life after the death of the body, if you think that there's a resurrection, if you think that
there's a God, if you think that there is eternal punishment, or eternal bliss, then the idea of
what rights a human being is going to be entitled to are going to be completely different. And
that's exactly what happened. Because the people who are the architects behind the Movement for
Human Rights, they had a certain definition of what it meant to be human. And it completely
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:49
			sidelined and completely excluded. Anything that couldn't be observed, or seen or measured with a
ruler. Anything like things to do with the soul. Anything's like things to do with God.
		
00:08:50 --> 00:09:36
			For those interested, this is a branch of philosophy or a brand of philosophy called philosophical
naturalism, philosophical naturalism as a physician, that everything that exists is purely material.
And therefore, everything that happens can be explained in terms of natural causes. You Muslims, you
say that Mohammed split the moon? Well, I can explain that due to some sort of optical illusion that
took place or some sort of mass delusion, delusion or hallucination. You believe that the angel
Gabriel came down and gave prophets revelation? Well, we can explain that through hallucinations and
through stories and through things like this. This is philosophical naturalism. And once you put a
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:58
			name to it, you realize that it's everywhere, that most of the textbooks that you would have studied
history from, or especially science from or anything in public school, you would find that
philosophical naturalism is the philosophy of the textbooks that you study. They do not recognize a
soul. They did not recognize an afterlife. They did not recognize God. They did not recognize Heaven
and * and these sorts of things.
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:06
			When you subtract God, when you subtract Heaven and *, when you subtract the soul, when you
subtract the afterlife what is left?
		
00:10:08 --> 00:10:15
			The folks who came up with human rights, they said that, well, what's left is property. What's left
is property.
		
00:10:16 --> 00:10:19
			And that's why we have such a big emphasis on property rights in the United States of America.
		
00:10:21 --> 00:10:45
			The thinking goes, the most fundamental thing about you is your body. Right? The most essential
thing that defines who you are is your consciousness. Let's see, I have a left hand here and a right
hand here. If I want to, I can move my left hand, if I want to, I can move my right hand. That's
part of my territory. If I want to move out bellows left hand,
		
00:10:46 --> 00:10:57
			can I do it? Not without coming out there and grabbing them? Right? I can't do it of my own
conscious will. I have to do by force or by bribes, so I'll give you something, right.
		
00:10:59 --> 00:11:24
			So the thinking goes, Okay, that's what it is right there. That's where you draw the boundaries of
the self. The self is like a piece of land, it's like territory. And your consciousness means that
you are the sovereign, you're the king. Over that territory, you can control it, you can make it
move, you can do, you know, stupid Tiktok dances or whatever it is you do in the privacy of your own
home, that this is your territory of the sovereign, but you can do with it what you want.
		
00:11:27 --> 00:11:45
			downstream of that idea, downstream of that idea. This is where we get things like my body, my
choice. So you've heard, for example, when it comes to abortion, when it comes to, you know, having
Kula when it comes to abortion, even when it comes to hijab, and we'll talk we'll talk about that in
a second.
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:50
			People saying this is not acceptable, my body my choice.
		
00:11:51 --> 00:12:09
			And we'll talk about why that contradicts Islam in a bit. But the idea is that I own my body, and I
owe my body completely. We've already subtracted God, we subtracted the soul, we've subtracted the
afterlife, the only thing left is me and my body. I own it completely in the most absolute sense,
and nobody can tell me, nobody can tell me what to do with it.
		
00:12:11 --> 00:12:12
			We'll come back to that later.
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:25
			If you own your body, if we assume again, we're rolling with the Enlightenment folks, here, we're
rolling with the philosophical naturalist for a second. If we assume that this is true, I own my
body completely and totally.
		
00:12:26 --> 00:12:50
			What does that imply about the good, what is good in life good in life is to be able to exercise my
autonomy, to be able to exercise that conscious, well. If I want to write, I want to move my right
hand, I should be able to move my right hand. If I want to move my right hand, and someone stopping
me from moving my right hand. That is the biggest crime that could possibly happen.
		
00:12:51 --> 00:12:59
			This is called autonomy, autonomy, the ability to do what I want. With what I assume that I own.
		
00:13:02 --> 00:13:21
			This idea of owning yourself, and autonomy, it has tremendous consequences for how we think and feel
about things in American culture. I know brother Jamil, you've heard of I bet you've heard of what
do people call when you get married, they call it the ball and chain. The ball on chain, right?
		
00:13:22 --> 00:13:54
			Anybody else hear of this phrase? Maybe the folks who don't come from the US haven't heard of this
phrase? People actually going look it up refer to marriage, and especially a wife as the ball and
chain. You guys know what the ball and chain is? You ever see the prisoners that are in jail, and
they've got like literally shackled a heavy ball to their legs so they can't run away. Right? So the
assumption here is that marriage is a punishment. Marriage is a limitation. Marriage is a bad thing.
Why? What can't you do when you're married?
		
00:13:58 --> 00:14:04
			A promiscuous, thank you very much. Someone had to say it. And he chose very academic language to
say, I appreciate that.
		
00:14:05 --> 00:14:40
			Exactly. If you if you're tied to marriage, you can't be promiscuous. And with if you're going to
start from the idea that I own my body, and the best thing to do is autonomy is to be able to do
what I want, then how could marriage be looked at in a positive way? Marriage is a prison sentence.
Marriage is the ball on chain, it's a punishment. It's something that's going to restrict my
freedom. That's why they throw bachelor parties, and bachelorette parties. We're celebrating your
last day of freedom all the nonsense things that people say in those scenarios.
		
00:14:41 --> 00:14:49
			It's only possible to think this way and we'll contrast that with a slab I'm looking to contrast
that right now. The prophesy said I'm so this is half of your deen
		
00:14:50 --> 00:14:51
			half of your deen
		
00:14:52 --> 00:14:59
			look at the difference between imagining marriage as something that restricts you limits your
freedom something that you got it Ah yeah.
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:24
			We joke we say the wizard or DACA. Lea, right? We call though I call the wife the interior minister.
Right? And those are jokes, okay? But it's an American culture, English language is another level to
call somebody who is the mother of your own children, who is supposed to complete your religion for
you to call them on the ball on chain. Alright, as very inappropriate. And it's indicative of this
way of thinking about our bodies and thinking about autonomy.
		
00:15:26 --> 00:16:06
			If marriage is a ball and chain, okay, then what's the flip side of that? The flip side of that is
people assume, and this is what is part of what's gotten us in trouble today, that people should be
able to pursue any sexual opportunity that they find, and they experience. And way back in the day,
it was limited by cultural sensibility. So people were still freaked out about homosexuality. And so
they didn't think about that. But they thought about, if you want to have girlfriends, or you want
to have boyfriends, what's wrong with it? What's wrong with it? If you choose it, if you're
consenting, and she's consenting, then where's the heart? Right? Then the cultural sensibilities
		
00:16:06 --> 00:16:24
			start to get eroded, and they started to shift. Now it was okay, if it's two guys, if it's two
girls, now if we change our genders, now, if we do this, the only thing that's holding it together
is the idea of autonomy, the idea that I should be able to do what I want,
		
00:16:25 --> 00:16:36
			without looking in any way to what it is the thing that you're doing, or what is it that you want to
do, or trying to make a judgement about what it is you want to do, hey, what you want to do is
wrong.
		
00:16:41 --> 00:16:43
			Ask the ladies to please quiet that butterfly thing.
		
00:16:47 --> 00:17:00
			Within this framework, you don't have any ability to tell anybody else, hey, what you want to do is
wrong. They say what is my life? Mind your business? It's my choice. I'm not hurting anybody.
Where's the harm?
		
00:17:01 --> 00:17:05
			And these are the things that are said. Because this is where we're as how we're set up to believe.
		
00:17:07 --> 00:17:24
			It has other influences and other sort of consequences. It has consequences on how people think
about their own faith. It has consequences, intergenerational consequences. Okay. How do you view
your parents? How do you view your grandparents? When your parents tell you I want you home at 10?
		
00:17:27 --> 00:17:49
			Dad, Baba, okay, there's a certain degree of that, that that's normal. But look at and this is why I
discourage anybody from letting their kids watch Disney movies. Look at every single Disney movie
out there. Find a one single Disney movie with a positive pet father figure. Can anybody think of a
positive father character in a single Disney movie?
		
00:17:50 --> 00:17:51
			Oh, wait.
		
00:17:54 --> 00:17:55
			Not Aladdin.
		
00:17:58 --> 00:18:02
			Lion King. He's killed. That's easy. You get rid of them?
		
00:18:06 --> 00:18:06
			Yeah.
		
00:18:10 --> 00:18:12
			No, say again. Was
		
00:18:15 --> 00:18:29
			Cinderella, the Cinderella have a father? No, I don't think so. I don't think so. So fathers are
either completely absent, or killed off? Or they're evil and they're restrictive and they just don't
understand
		
00:18:30 --> 00:18:41
			and abusive. Exactly. Now, what does this teach your child? This teaches your child to rebel against
your parents, your parents don't understand you. They're standing in the way of you doing what you
want.
		
00:18:42 --> 00:18:50
			What's wrong with it? There is no harm in it. This is what you want to do. This is freedom. This is
following your heart and all the other nice platitudes and slogans that we have to justify.
		
00:18:51 --> 00:19:15
			If you think about it, you start it. I own my body. Nobody can tell me what to do. It's all about
autonomy, doing what I want. This is where it comes down the chain. This is where it happens, where
it unfolds. And so people become suspicious of all restrictions, restrictions from their parents,
restrictions from their culture and their tradition and restrictions from their religion. Oh, yes.
		
00:19:17 --> 00:19:22
			How do you how do you account for the fact that one person prays five times a day and they feel like
it's nothing
		
00:19:23 --> 00:19:29
			and another person prays inshallah five times a day and they feel like it's the hardest thing in the
world?
		
00:19:32 --> 00:19:41
			The inside is different. The orientation is different. The regard is different. Do you see this
thing this is actually going to put you into paradise? This is actually your true liberation.
		
00:19:42 --> 00:19:53
			But somebody else thinks of it as just limitation. I could be going to make money. I could be doing
this. I could be playing games. Why do I have to pause the game?
		
00:19:54 --> 00:19:56
			Five more minutes. 10 more minutes.
		
00:19:58 --> 00:20:00
			These things matter how we think
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:11
			about ourselves, what's the definition of the human being we say no soul, no God, no afterlife, just
materials just me, I own myself, I can do what I want. Everything else takes care of itself.
		
00:20:14 --> 00:20:28
			And so we see that this affects and actually infiltrates us and colonizes us as Muslims, even when,
even when we think that we're defending our faith, let's go back to France. Well, let's go back to
the US.
		
00:20:30 --> 00:20:44
			When teenage girls or young women, they try to justify wearing the hijab. What will they say? How
will they defend it? They're more likely to say, my hijab my choice.
		
00:20:46 --> 00:20:49
			Then I will say, This is an order from Allah sounds odd.
		
00:20:51 --> 00:20:55
			You see how the outcome might look good. But the way that you got there was crooked.
		
00:20:57 --> 00:21:09
			If my hijab my choice, even if it's technically true, we're not going to force anybody but just for
the sake of argument. If we're defending hijab based off of choice, does that mean that if someone
doesn't choose it, that it's okay, that's fine.
		
00:21:10 --> 00:21:12
			This is a command from Allah subhanaw taala.
		
00:21:13 --> 00:21:19
			This is something I mean, technically, you have a choice. Yeah. But the choice is whether to obey or
disobey Allah subhanaw taala. And
		
00:21:21 --> 00:21:26
			if we make an idol out of choice, then we end up in hot water very, very quickly.
		
00:21:29 --> 00:21:33
			If we can criticize our fathers and feel like our fathers are restricting us
		
00:21:34 --> 00:21:41
			that the male scholars got it all wrong, because they were in fact infected by the patriarchy. Then
what about the Prophet Mohammed Salah ha Davison.
		
00:21:42 --> 00:21:48
			What about when our teenage girls say, A man can't make laws to govern my body.
		
00:21:49 --> 00:21:51
			A man can't tell me what to do with my body
		
00:21:52 --> 00:21:54
			wasn't the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa salam, a man.
		
00:21:56 --> 00:21:58
			You see how these things have consequences.
		
00:22:00 --> 00:22:25
			The idea of autonomy. Part of why it's very popular has continued to be popular is because autonomy
is very, very easy to manipulate. If you're a corporation, if you're a politician, we saw that under
Trump, we see that every day with commercials to get people to feel like they're making a choice.
You go on to the gas station, you see you got four coolers full of drinks,
		
00:22:26 --> 00:22:40
			50 different brands, you feel like you've got an amazing choice. But if you follow the money, you'll
see that all of those drinks and brands are only owned by about three or four companies. So you get
the illusion of choice.
		
00:22:42 --> 00:22:54
			There used to be back in the day a Dr. Pepper commercial, where people are like you and me. And they
have you know, normal clothes and walking down the street. And one at a time. They rip off their
outer clothes and got a Dr Pepper shirt underneath.
		
00:22:55 --> 00:23:12
			But all the texts of every shirt is different. So something says like, you know, rebel, says this or
whatever. And I just thought that was so funny because that's exactly what we have. We have the
illusion of choice in our society. People making you feel like you get to choose, let's take gender.
		
00:23:13 --> 00:23:24
			You get to have 100 genders now 200 genders they keep on coming with them. 500 genders, what gender
Do you want to be? What pronoun Do you want? You can have a letter as your pronoun, nobody knows how
to say it.
		
00:23:25 --> 00:23:26
			You can have it
		
00:23:27 --> 00:23:41
			is this meaningful choice. But if I choose I want to live under the car. Or I want to tell somebody
in a college campus, there's only two genders? Do I have that choice? Do I have that freedom?
		
00:23:42 --> 00:23:45
			See how they react? You don't.
		
00:23:46 --> 00:24:07
			Autonomy is a weak concept. And it's a weak thing because it leads to less anxiousness, it leads to
promiscuity, it leads to poor choices. If you're just doing whatever you want to do, just to say
that you're the one that gets to do it, that's your freedom, that's your, then it's going to be a
very, very dark road that you go down.
		
00:24:09 --> 00:24:12
			When you stagnation, stagnation too, of course,
		
00:24:13 --> 00:24:28
			of course, because you're only going to be a slave of your desires. And that's the thing we live in
a time of inversions, the modern world is full of inversions. Just like what they call gender
affirming care, is actually child abuse.
		
00:24:29 --> 00:24:30
			In reality,
		
00:24:31 --> 00:24:41
			what they call freedom is actually enslavement. There is no freedom except being a slave of Allah
subhanaw taala and being a servant of anything else is slavery.
		
00:24:43 --> 00:24:59
			So that has to do with who is a human being. This is the idea of what a human being is in the human
rights framework is the human being is only matter. It's only material. It's only things that you
can touch. There's no God. There's no afterlife, there is no heaven and *, there's
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:00
			No.
		
00:25:01 --> 00:25:03
			Revelation, there's no prophets anything like this.
		
00:25:05 --> 00:25:19
			The idea of now what's the idea behind it of what's going to happen to you after you die? As you can
probably imagine, the idea is that there is no such thing beyond the afterlife, there is no thing
beyond death, there is no afterlife, there is no heaven and *
		
00:25:21 --> 00:25:31
			does this have consequences on what rights you think that you're entitled to? Oh, yes, it does? Oh,
yes, it does. If you don't believe in the afterlife, then this is the only shot you have.
		
00:25:32 --> 00:25:39
			That's why they say YOLO. You only live once, which we don't believe we say you you live twice.
		
00:25:40 --> 00:25:41
			You only die once.
		
00:25:43 --> 00:25:48
			But this is real. Because if this is the only shot that you have,
		
00:25:49 --> 00:26:14
			you're going to cling to life, you're going to cling to the pleasures, you're going to be sucked in
by the dunya. And Allah subhanaw taala actually criticize as many as raw eel, the Jews for this
attitude. Right? He says that, if you were true, or if you are correct in your belief that you would
be in heaven alone, then you should seek death. But nobody is more clinging to life, except the, but
these people are other than these people.
		
00:26:15 --> 00:26:29
			And so you see how this has real consequences, imagining that a human being the definition of a
human being has nothing to do with an afterlife. It makes us all in a scarcity mindset, that I gotta
get mine now. Because there's nothing coming after I die.
		
00:26:30 --> 00:27:08
			And the last thing we'll touch on here, before coming to a new subject, is what does this
understanding of the human being think about religion? If we say a human being is just physical
matter, no God, no afterlife, no profits, then how can we account for religion? What's the idea of
religion within the human rights frame? The idea of religion is that it is something invented by
human beings. Just like your culture, just like you eat biryani, or you eat Giovannucci or you eat
my soul, or you eat, you know, whatever, we can go down the list.
		
00:27:09 --> 00:27:12
			Okay, you're Muslim, and you're Hindu and you're Christian, it's just your culture.
		
00:27:14 --> 00:27:51
			That's the assumption and the implication of the human rights, right? We only define human beings as
material creatures, that religion has to be material as well. What do we say rites and rituals and
beliefs and these sorts of supposedly neutral language, we're not talking about truth and falsehood.
We're not talking about right and wrong. We're not talking about good and evil. It was a very, you
know, spiritual ways to talk about it, not secular ways, not ways that jive with human rights. And
if you look into the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it's actually very interesting. You'll
find that article 18, I believe, it supposedly guarantees the rights for people to practice their
		
00:27:51 --> 00:28:25
			religion freely, which sounds like a good thing. However, you scroll all the way down to the bottom,
I think the second to last article and article 31, or something like that, you'll find that they say
that the right to the freedom of religion is restricted to anything the state deems necessary for
public safety, public morality, or the personality of the state. That caveat, that addendum that
later part of it is only possible if you think that religion is just phony. If you think religion is
just the outcome of human activity, and culture.
		
00:28:28 --> 00:28:57
			All of these assumptions that are behind the idea of what it means to be a human being, within the
human rights frame, it creates what we call an imperative for action or a call to action, it's not
neutral, it's not neutral, it actually puts certain things up as good and puts other things down as
evil. And so the maximization of freedom, doing whatever you want, pursuing every pleasure you have
acting on every desire that you have, like we said in the clip, but today is good in this way of
thinking about the world.
		
00:28:59 --> 00:29:10
			And the evil, the well, the evil has to do with pain, it has to have restrictions, it has to do with
people telling you what to do. You've got all these the uncles in the machine and the Auntie's in
the machine that are, you know, shaking their finger at me.
		
00:29:11 --> 00:29:28
			And that's not an excuse for bad etiquette. But the idea that this is just a complete wrong thing.
They're trying to save you. They're trying to save you in this life and the next, this is something
that is not viewed as okay, it's actually a restricting thing and a bad thing, if under this
definition of what it means to be human.
		
00:29:29 --> 00:29:59
			The next thing that we want to highlight is that human rights is not neutral. Politically, it's not
neutral. Philosophically, everything we just talked about shows human rights is not neutral.
Philosophically, it has a certain idea of what it means to be human. And that idea of what it means
to be human is completely contradicting Islam's idea of what it means to be human. Okay, but it's
also not neutral politically. And that means that it sets up a hierarchy. Human rights does, as to
view is more human.
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:05
			And who was less you take the war on Yemen, versus the war on Ukraine.
		
00:30:07 --> 00:30:10
			Look at how each one is dealt with in the media,
		
00:30:11 --> 00:30:14
			which people are read as being more human.
		
00:30:16 --> 00:30:38
			People from Ukraine, you have literally people on a nightly, like on the nightly news on CNN and
CNBC, you can look up the quotes, saying things like, we never expected it to happen to a European
nation. White people with blue eyes, actually people said this on air. And the one person said, let
me choose my words carefully before he's before he said something like that.
		
00:30:39 --> 00:31:09
			The mask came off for a second, they showed that what they really thought and racism is there and
racism is a part of it. But another part of it. Another part of it is that viewing humans in this
materialistic way, it sets up some people to be read as fully human, and other people to be read as
not quite human. Remember back when back in the 90s, maybe some of you remember when the United
States had a boycott or sanctions against Iraq, right after the first Gulf War.
		
00:31:10 --> 00:31:40
			And half a million Iraqi children died as a result of those sanctions. Okay, people think sanctions
is just like you're going to hurt Putin or whoever you're going to hurt. Putin is going to be fine.
It's the kids that suffer. It's the women that suffer it's the other people that suffer. Half a
million Muslim children died. Because of the the US sanctions against Iraq, and actually a reporter
cornered Madeleine Albright, who was part of the administration at that time and asked her point
blank, is it worth it?
		
00:31:41 --> 00:31:42
			What'd she say?
		
00:31:43 --> 00:31:44
			said yes, it's worth it.
		
00:31:45 --> 00:31:48
			Without hesitating, without hesitation, yes, it's worth.
		
00:31:49 --> 00:32:30
			Because half a million is just a number. It's just a number. It doesn't mean anything. But we're
these people registered as fully human. They're religious. They want Sharia law. They believe in
God, they believe in the afterlife. They don't think of themselves as just material. They don't
think of themselves in these waves. Now they weren't registered as fully human, go to Palestine. And
the same thing happens. How are the Palestinians treated in the media versus the folks from the
occupier side? We see all the time. And you can see it spelled out very clearly in the in the news
article headlines. It'll say Israelis killed, but Palestinians died as if it was a mystery who
		
00:32:30 --> 00:32:37
			killed. Right. And lots of things like that. That was actually one SubhanAllah. I had it on the
slide presentation that I made up.
		
00:32:38 --> 00:32:40
			It was from the New York Times.
		
00:32:41 --> 00:32:46
			And it said something like Israeli missile finds.
		
00:32:49 --> 00:33:02
			Kids from Gaza, or of people from Gaza at a cafe getting prepared to watch the World Cup. The
article was about a bomb being dropped on people and killing them. And the headline said finds
		
00:33:03 --> 00:33:05
			didn't mention anything about the people who died
		
00:33:07 --> 00:33:09
			and brought up the World Cup.
		
00:33:11 --> 00:33:14
			If that if those people are not registered as human beings,
		
00:33:16 --> 00:33:17
			that I don't know of a clear example.
		
00:33:19 --> 00:33:45
			So putting things in this way, human rights framework, this is what a human being is. It's only
material we expect you to be secular and democratic and you know, not really religious only in your
own home, private religion, these sorts of things. Some people there's a hierarchy. Some people are
read as fully human. And some people are read as subhuman. And the people who are read as subhuman
are more prone to be to be violated and punished and bombed.
		
00:33:47 --> 00:33:50
			There's a second way in which this political hegemony works.
		
00:33:51 --> 00:33:52
			We're Pakistanis in the house.
		
00:33:53 --> 00:33:59
			Everybody know what Biden approved for for Pakistan? What education initiative he approved for
Pakistan,
		
00:34:00 --> 00:34:07
			hundreds of millions of dollars for LGBTQ education in Pakistan, your tax money in mind,
		
00:34:08 --> 00:34:12
			hundreds of millions of dollars being approved for just this type of thing in Pakistan.
		
00:34:14 --> 00:34:24
			While there are people without safe drinking water, while there are people without electricity, or
people without a roof over their heads, while there are people we've seen the floods happening in
Pakistan over the years.
		
00:34:26 --> 00:35:00
			What does this tell us about the power of the political side of human rights is that it's not just
about sorting people into who who is more human and less human. It's also about trying to create
full humans. It's also about indoctrination. It's also trying about and this is where it comes in to
our schools and our kids in these public schools, and people trying to say, to be fully human, you
got to get with the rest of the program. You got to look at yourself as materialistic. There is no
real God, you might believe it. That's okay, but you're gonna believe it at all.
		
00:35:00 --> 00:35:06
			I'm not here, after life, morality, good and evil, these sorts of things, you have to keep it at
home.
		
00:35:10 --> 00:35:26
			Now, some people might say, and many people we have in this community, you know, mashallah, they
came as refugees, and they came as refugees, partly because of the human rights discourse, you have
the UN that attempted to try to eke out some sort of human rights for everybody so that people would
have some sort of
		
00:35:28 --> 00:36:05
			demand that could be made good on when they tried to come to a different place, because they're
forced out because of violence or whatnot. So is it all bad? No, it's not all bad. But there's a
difference between deploying something as a tool, using something as a tool versus believing in
something. You can use something as a tool, but you know, what it can do? And you know what it can
do you know, what the dangers are, I know that if I have a shotgun, and I'll pass it off to Ackman,
who's my student at Sunday school, right? Probably not a good idea. There's a lot of dangerous do
and no offense to you I've met you're responsible, young man. But that would not be good judgment on
		
00:36:05 --> 00:36:06
			my part.
		
00:36:07 --> 00:36:13
			Because this is a tool that is dangerous. And if you misuse it, you can hurt yourself. And you can
hurt other people around you.
		
00:36:15 --> 00:36:51
			Using a discourse that goes against our beliefs, can you do it? Yeah, you can do it. Sometimes,
maybe if I meet the mayor, right. Or if I meet the school board, I might need to use the language of
human rights just so they understand. We have the human right to do this, and that and that, okay.
But I don't believe in it. Because I don't believe in the whole under girding of this ideology that,
that imagines that human beings are material, and they don't have these sorts of things that along
with them, no human beings, as we'll come in a second, human beings, they are mostly souls, they are
primarily about the soul, everything is about the soul, and the afterlife.
		
00:36:52 --> 00:37:32
			But you have to be careful, even if you use the discourse of human rights, or you try to use this
language to try to get some of your rights. If you use it too much, what's going to happen is that
it's going to make it stronger and harder to remove. And then also, you're at risk for changing on
the inside and believing in it. Like the examples we gave with the hijab, if we keep on you might
have to explain to your coworker or your employer or your teacher, you might have to say, I wear the
hijab, because that's my choice. That might be the only language that they're ready to understand at
the moment. But if that's all you say, to the point where you believe that you've put yourself and
		
00:37:32 --> 00:37:36
			your faith on a very, very dangerous and weak setting,
		
00:37:37 --> 00:37:43
			because the second that you stopped believing that you should be your choice, you have full
justification to leave it.
		
00:37:46 --> 00:38:25
			Needless to say, the idea of who a human being is within a slab is completely completely, completely
different. The first and most essential thing to understand about the cosmology of a stand that
means what is real, is that the most real thing, it's not matter. It's not atoms, it's not you or
me, the most real thing is Allah. That's why one of the last names is ad hoc, the truth, the
reality, Allah is more real than I am real, more real than you are real, more real than the cameras
and the YouTube videos or the channel or anything, Allah is the most real thing.
		
00:38:27 --> 00:38:29
			And everything else unfolds from there.
		
00:38:32 --> 00:38:46
			Human beings we believe are created, we didn't just come up out of nowhere. We didn't just come from
monkeys, we didn't we're not just the product of random processes, mechanical processes, natural
quote, unquote, processes.
		
00:38:47 --> 00:39:03
			If we were then we would have no purpose. Why are we here? We believe that we are creations and that
the one that created us as wise. And if the one that creates something as wise, then there's wisdom
in the creation of that thing. And that gives us purpose.
		
00:39:04 --> 00:39:19
			It's not just for play, it's not random. We are here for a reason. And we have value. If Allah
subhanaw taala created you then you have value, because he is the most wise and he would not have
created something if there were not value to it.
		
00:39:21 --> 00:39:23
			When it comes to defining ourselves,
		
00:39:24 --> 00:39:34
			the most real part of ourselves is not our bodies, it's our souls. Because the soul is what's going
to either get us into an we'll get there in a second, it's going to get us into the afterlife or
not.
		
00:39:35 --> 00:39:53
			The body comes and goes. You're a teenager or 20 Young something and you're putting up you know,
posing for his Instagram and stuff like that posing for the tick tock. Trying to get other people to
pay attention to you look at you. Give him 50 years, you're gonna be old and wrinkly. No one's gonna
want to look at you anymore.
		
00:39:54 --> 00:40:00
			The body fails. The body deteriorates, the body goes away. And yes, we can
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:08
			believe that the body will be resurrected along with the soul of the afterlife. But the most
important part of you is not your body. The most important part of you is your soul.
		
00:40:10 --> 00:40:37
			When it comes to the relationship to your body, do you have complete just because I get to move it
and do things with it? I have complete ownership of it. No, I did not. This is a trust. This is
something that's given to me by Allah subhanaw taala. And that all comes downstream from believing
that Allah is the most real thing that I'm a creature and he created me that means that there are
responsibilities that I have, that there are duties that I have, I can't act in any way that I want.
		
00:40:38 --> 00:40:44
			If I do, it's going to put me in trouble for myself, for other people and with my Creator.
		
00:40:48 --> 00:40:59
			One of the things that Allah subhanaw taala created us with one of the expectations he has if it's
not autonomy, it's not just doing whatever I want, and I get to feel good because I chose it. I
chose it I get to choose.
		
00:41:00 --> 00:41:01
			Then what is it?
		
00:41:02 --> 00:41:27
			Allah Spano Tala, when he talks to the angels, and he told them what he was going to do, he was
going to create human beings. He says in Niger, I don't feel out of the Khalifa. He said, I'm going
to put on earth Halifa. And that's significant because Allah could have said other things. He could
have said, I'm going to put in sand on earth. He could have said I'm gonna put nests on Earth, or
measure on earth or any other word, but he chose Khalifa.
		
00:41:28 --> 00:41:31
			Because Khalifa is not a description of what you and I are.
		
00:41:33 --> 00:41:44
			It's a description of what you and I were meant to be. It's a job description. It's an aspiration.
It's like if I went along to one of the young guys here, and I said, You know what, you're going to
be a man one day.
		
00:41:45 --> 00:41:47
			Think about the reaction.
		
00:41:48 --> 00:42:01
			Think about what that does for somebody, that person might think in their whole lives, wow, I'm
going to be a man one day, I got something to look forward to, I have something to train for, I have
something to discipline myself, I've got to be ready. I've got to be worthy.
		
00:42:02 --> 00:42:26
			That's what Allah did for us. In the dragon, Phil Califa. I'm going to put on Earth, somebody who's
going to take care of the creation the way I want them to take care of it. Somebody who's going to
do on Earth, what I want them to do with it. Someone who's going to take care of everybody who's
going to deal with justice, that's going to be merciful and compassionate, and fair.
		
00:42:27 --> 00:42:34
			Very, very different from imagining that you and me are just a sack of cells with no creator and no
afterlife.
		
00:42:36 --> 00:42:57
			Looking at things in these ways, defining the human being in terms of what Islam says, not human
rights, not anybody else. It results in different imperatives. Remember, we said that the imperative
of the Human Rights frame was about autonomy, as long as you choose it, that's the best thing you
can do follow your heart to do you do whatever you want.
		
00:42:58 --> 00:43:21
			We have a whole different set of virtues, a whole different set of imperatives and goals. Obedience
is in itself a goal last time the otter has the believer saying so me, I know what I thought we
heard and we obey. At the same time, they're not forgotten, right? And then later we evade no
Samina. Well, I thought that we heard and then immediately we obeyed, that's a virtue.
		
00:43:22 --> 00:43:54
			So for me to say, I wear hijab, or I have a beard, or I don't shake women's hands or whatever,
because that's my choice. Okay, maybe once in a while, I have to break that out so that somebody
understands, but that's not really what I believe, I believe, and I do what I do, because I'm
obeying Allah. Because I believe in the virtue of obedience, obeying my Creator is a virtue. And
that's something that I aspire to do I succeed 100% of the time. Nope. Nobody's perfect. But that is
something that I aspire to
		
00:43:57 --> 00:44:05
			prudence, the idea of not consuming too much of refraining from taking too much or using too much.
		
00:44:07 --> 00:44:09
			If this world is all I have,
		
00:44:10 --> 00:44:23
			and the best thing that I can do is just whatever I want, that there's no limits for me. Every girl
chaser every food, eat it every experience, do it. As they say YOLO
		
00:44:24 --> 00:44:33
			completely different than if I'm saying no, I'm created, I've got a job. I've got to raise up to
this level and be a Kalita of Allah to be a steward for Allah in this dunya
		
00:44:34 --> 00:44:36
			that I'm only going to take what I need to do the job.
		
00:44:38 --> 00:44:46
			I'm going to eat what's enough for me and I'm going to share the rest. I'm going to live according
to my means and I'm going to make sure everybody else is set and good.
		
00:44:49 --> 00:44:50
			We believe in loyalty.
		
00:44:51 --> 00:44:59
			We believe in obedience not just to Allah to Allah, but we also believe in loyalty and obedience to
our fellow brothers and sisters and they have rights upon you to your parents.
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:20
			Due to extended relatives, are they hard to deal with? Sometimes? Yes, they are. Are they right all
the time? No, they're not. But that doesn't mean that they don't have any rights upon us. They have
rights upon us. That comes downstream from everything that we're talking about who is the human
being? What's the reality that Islam talks about?
		
00:45:22 --> 00:45:38
			It means that they have rights upon us. And we have a certain amount of loyalty to them. And
finally, the last thing, the last virtue, the last imperative that this way of looking at the world,
because Islam has an entire worldview, what it tells us what it teaches us has to be righteous.
		
00:45:39 --> 00:45:47
			To do the right thing when nobody is looking to do the right thing, because it's the right thing to
do. Not just because I chose it.
		
00:45:50 --> 00:46:09
			But because it's the right thing to do to look at the quality of the activity itself. Is this a good
thing? Is this right? Is it ethical? Is it moral, I don't care if anybody else is doing it. I don't
care if everybody else is selling lottery tickets. I don't care if everybody else is selling
alcohol. I don't care if it makes me feel free or autonomous or whatever. I don't care if it's what
I want.
		
00:46:12 --> 00:46:21
			Righteousness, to do the right thing the prophets have always said and he said, even if the Day of
Judgment is to be established right now, and you've got a sapling in your hand, you plant the
sapling.
		
00:46:23 --> 00:46:35
			Are you ever going to see the fruit? Are you ever going to experience that shade? No, but that's
irrelevant. We don't live for the dunya. We don't live for the results where people have process. We
do the right thing.
		
00:46:36 --> 00:46:40
			No matter the results, we do the right thing. And Allah subhanaw taala has our reward.
		
00:46:41 --> 00:47:27
			So we see that two entirely different ways of looking at the world. The idea of human rights, you
might need to use it. In very, very limited scenarios when you're talking to people. However, be
very careful. Because it assumes things about who the human being is. It assumes things about the
soul that assume things about the afterlife. It assumes things about religion and assumes things
about God that completely are at odds with a snap and true rights. And true justice is taken from
understanding what we're doing here, who we truly are. What is the nature of the soul? Where are we
headed? And what are the criteria that Allah subhanaw taala is going to judge us upon in the
		
00:47:27 --> 00:47:28
			afterlife. Well, Allahu Tada.