Brother who facilitated a divorce Faskh & immediately married her!

Haitham al-Haddad


Channel: Haitham al-Haddad

File Size: 2.62MB

Episode Notes

Share Page

Transcript ©

AI generated text may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn’t represent Muslim Central's views. No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever.

00:00:00--> 00:00:20

This is another common problem. very frequent question. Chef, this sister was divorced. And I want to propose to her. Yeah. How can I go for the procedure? I said, She's divorced, how long she's been divorced? I don't know. Or Yeah, she was divorced last month, or

00:00:21--> 00:00:24

as one brother has done.

00:00:25--> 00:00:30

And this is a case I dealt with recently and his wife,

00:00:31--> 00:00:32

unfortunately, she was

00:00:34--> 00:00:37

she was not Muslim. And she accepted this law.

00:00:38--> 00:00:42

And her husband was giving her a hard time.

00:00:44--> 00:00:45

She was not Christian.

00:00:47--> 00:01:07

But she was from the People of the Book. Okay, she got married to a brother, who gave her a hard time as she said, then another brother knew about her. And he felt sorry for her. And he facilitated the divorce for her.

00:01:10--> 00:01:18

And then when they went to an Imam, brave Imam who dissolved her marriage.

00:01:19--> 00:01:25

Okay. The brother proposed to her immediately on the spot.

00:01:26--> 00:01:28

This is a big Hello.

00:01:29--> 00:01:31

If this way

00:01:32--> 00:01:50

okay, if it is not the first provided that this vessel is valid. I don't believe that it was the very first anyway. Okay. But if you propose to divorce woman inherited as if you are proposing to a married woman.

00:01:53--> 00:01:53

Is it clear?

00:01:55--> 00:01:55


00:01:57--> 00:02:05

Is it clear or not? As if you are proposing to any of your friends wives, can you do this?

00:02:07--> 00:02:08

This is exactly the same.

00:02:09--> 00:02:12

So that's why we need to understand this ruling.

00:02:14--> 00:02:22

It is a ruling that is misunderstood. I always speak about it. That divorce see is what

00:02:23--> 00:02:24

is alive.

00:02:25--> 00:02:34

And that's why as we said yesterday, last time that she does not have to consent from