» Earn on-going rewards and help us do more! «

Brother who facilitated a divorce Faskh & immediately married her!

share this pageShare Page
Haitham al-Haddad

Channel: Haitham al-Haddad

Episode Notes

Episode Transcript

© No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever. Transcripts are auto-generated and thus will be be inaccurate. We are working on a system to allow volunteers to edit transcripts in a controlled system.

00:00:00--> 00:00:20

This is another common problem. very frequent question. Chef, this sister was divorced. And I want to propose to her. Yeah. How can I go for the procedure? I said, She's divorced, how long she's been divorced? I don't know. Or Yeah, she was divorced last month, or

00:00:21--> 00:00:24

as one brother has done.

00:00:25--> 00:00:30

And this is a case I dealt with recently and his wife,

00:00:31--> 00:00:32

unfortunately, she was

00:00:34--> 00:00:37

she was not Muslim. And she accepted this law.

00:00:38--> 00:00:42

And her husband was giving her a hard time.

00:00:44--> 00:00:45

She was not Christian.

00:00:47--> 00:01:07

But she was from the People of the Book. Okay, she got married to a brother, who gave her a hard time as she said, then another brother knew about her. And he felt sorry for her. And he facilitated the divorce for her.

00:01:10--> 00:01:18

And then when they went to an Imam, brave Imam who dissolved her marriage.

00:01:19--> 00:01:25

Okay. The brother proposed to her immediately on the spot.

00:01:26--> 00:01:28

This is a big Hello.

00:01:29--> 00:01:31

If this way

00:01:32--> 00:01:50

okay, if it is not the first provided that this vessel is valid. I don't believe that it was the very first anyway. Okay. But if you propose to divorce woman inherited as if you are proposing to a married woman.

00:01:53--> 00:01:53

Is it clear?

00:01:55--> 00:01:55


00:01:57--> 00:02:05

Is it clear or not? As if you are proposing to any of your friends wives, can you do this?

00:02:07--> 00:02:08

This is exactly the same.

00:02:09--> 00:02:12

So that's why we need to understand this ruling.

00:02:14--> 00:02:22

It is a ruling that is misunderstood. I always speak about it. That divorce see is what

00:02:23--> 00:02:24

is alive.

00:02:25--> 00:02:34

And that's why as we said yesterday, last time that she does not have to consent from