Shadee Elmasry – 9 Bid’a Hasan & Tajribi Knowledge

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss various topics related to gumpl, including the role of tragedy, food, and the concept of tags. They also touch on the concept of tags and how they relate to the concept of tags.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:04

My next question is also somewhat of an old school, but it relates

00:00:04 --> 00:00:05

to practices

00:00:07 --> 00:00:08

element to gdb.

00:00:10 --> 00:00:13

Is that accepted or not as a source? I know you even remember

00:00:13 --> 00:00:17

that even Taymiyah had a comment on this. He said, sometimes when

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20

you want your DUA to be Mooster job, you go to one of the old

00:00:20 --> 00:00:24

masajid that's no longer used, and you give life to it, you print it,

00:00:24 --> 00:00:30

have admitted gdb 10 gdb means experiential. From the experience

00:00:30 --> 00:00:35

is the ad dead of vicar. This is a something that comes up a lot, and

00:00:35 --> 00:00:39

I want to know the hand up somebody's approach to it. For

00:00:39 --> 00:00:43

example, husband alone emo kid, it's well known that it's spread

00:00:43 --> 00:00:48

around amongst the many machines that 450 is its number of Salah

00:00:48 --> 00:00:53

Allah Rasool L for Mara phillium 1000 in a day, is its number.

00:00:54 --> 00:00:58

Okay, and this is not no one saying that this is NetFlow or Ned

00:00:58 --> 00:01:03

mandu or anything, but it's to gdb knowledge just like someone says,

00:01:03 --> 00:01:07

you know 15 setups in the morning 15 At night, okay, it's just

00:01:07 --> 00:01:12

experience and things like this run five miles a day is becomes a

00:01:12 --> 00:01:16

weird for many people in the fitness world. Could you comment

00:01:16 --> 00:01:21

on the role of tragedy be knowledge? This has to do with

00:01:21 --> 00:01:26

food? Yes. Angry. Previous question also had to do with food.

00:01:27 --> 00:01:29

I hope when the listeners

00:01:31 --> 00:01:35

when they when they listen to these things.

00:01:37 --> 00:01:42

I hope that they do not rush into ringing this quote from this

00:01:42 --> 00:01:46

Hanbury Shea who rejected something in particular, we are

00:01:46 --> 00:01:49

talking about food, we also love them.

00:01:50 --> 00:01:56

Do they reject these ideas? Do they accept them? Can Can this be

00:01:56 --> 00:02:00

something that doesn't contradict with the humbling phone? This was?

00:02:01 --> 00:02:02

This somehow was the question

00:02:04 --> 00:02:08

I haven't handled. And this is mentioned in the books of faith. I

00:02:09 --> 00:02:13

used to believe that if you write Psalm eight of the Quran, in a

00:02:13 --> 00:02:14

glass

00:02:15 --> 00:02:21

of water, and give it to the pregnant woman or give it to the

00:02:22 --> 00:02:29

sick person, this would help. Where is this in the Sunnah. If

00:02:29 --> 00:02:33

you bring me a hadith, if you bring me that this was done by

00:02:33 --> 00:02:33

some of

00:02:35 --> 00:02:36

the companions,

00:02:38 --> 00:02:42

you will I will give you other examples, from Muhammad himself

00:02:42 --> 00:02:46

from other from other people, at the time of admission from our

00:02:46 --> 00:02:48

high Nebula, who

00:02:49 --> 00:02:54

showed us that you sort of dumb as * can never be contradictory

00:02:54 --> 00:03:01

with such things, if you tried something, and it resulted in

00:03:01 --> 00:03:02

another thing.

00:03:03 --> 00:03:07

And your Aki that is that Allah subhanaw taala is the real DOER of

00:03:07 --> 00:03:07

things.

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15

I should I shouldn't fear for you, I should feel for the one who

00:03:15 --> 00:03:20

believes that things have the power almost kind of delegated the

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23

power in them to act accordingly.

00:03:24 --> 00:03:28

And they might believe in such things this this is this is the

00:03:28 --> 00:03:32

interesting, but for for me and for anyone who believes that the

00:03:32 --> 00:03:36

last panel data is the doer of things. And you know that this is

00:03:36 --> 00:03:40

the Sunnah of Allah Allah that the unbelievers have doesn't reject

00:03:40 --> 00:03:41

such things.

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46

In the end, you might find that Hamdani or to rejecting something

00:03:46 --> 00:03:47

in particular

00:03:49 --> 00:03:54

but this doesn't mean that they reject the Constitution. Now and I

00:03:54 --> 00:03:55

have many examples in my mind, but

00:03:56 --> 00:04:00

will take a lot of time, but at least this example is enough.

00:04:02 --> 00:04:07

Which means in that case that there is something known as an if

00:04:07 --> 00:04:09

we can, we can rename this to gdb

00:04:10 --> 00:04:12

experiential

00:04:13 --> 00:04:18

practice is it a type of Buddha has an event is there such a

00:04:18 --> 00:04:21

thing? Because it sounds very much similar we're gonna get the same

00:04:21 --> 00:04:27

results what Imam Muhammad did for example, recite the ads or write

00:04:27 --> 00:04:31

them in water right the dissolve the ink and water or something

00:04:31 --> 00:04:34

like this. What else is that besides what we would call better

00:04:34 --> 00:04:35

Hassan

00:04:36 --> 00:04:41

it's just that this is an issue of terminology can Yes, it's been a

00:04:41 --> 00:04:44

hassle. Now I agree. Do the Anabela have something called be

00:04:44 --> 00:04:48

that Hassan do the HANA Villa that Hannah Bella and we are talking

00:04:48 --> 00:04:53

about a term in the embodiments term according to those people who

00:04:53 --> 00:04:59

call themselves an avid now this this is a teacup or fie Stila

00:05:00 --> 00:05:03

No, we do not have something like that linguistically. Yes, it's a

00:05:03 --> 00:05:07

bit of a hassle. It's better and it has Yes. Then how many of us

00:05:07 --> 00:05:11

have Elpida is either disliked or haram prohibited?

00:05:13 --> 00:05:14

This

00:05:15 --> 00:05:17

term is a term

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21

which means that there has been a husband. Yes, linguistically. Yes,

00:05:22 --> 00:05:22

we agree and

00:05:23 --> 00:05:28

then what would they call such an action such as whatever the Tamia

00:05:28 --> 00:05:32

said about going to the or the massages that are out of use or

00:05:32 --> 00:05:36

Imam Ahmed's use of the verses for pregnancy? What would we what

00:05:36 --> 00:05:37

would they call that?

00:05:39 --> 00:05:43

By it, they will give it a ruling they will say this is permissible

00:05:43 --> 00:05:48

or this is Sunnah, sunnah, they will call it sunnah. They are not,

00:05:48 --> 00:05:52

they are not restricted. In that case, they do not call it sunnah,

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54

if it has been done by the prophets, I send them only you

00:05:54 --> 00:05:58

know, they call it sooner, even if it hasn't been done by the

00:05:58 --> 00:06:01

prophets on the laurels. Now, and they have they have setup and they

00:06:01 --> 00:06:02

have

00:06:04 --> 00:06:08

this was the strongest example Ahmed himself writing the aid. And

00:06:08 --> 00:06:13

it's and you know, you know, what, what makes it really strong that

00:06:13 --> 00:06:17

they mentioned this example, in particular, in the books of faith.

00:06:18 --> 00:06:20

And you open a book of fiction, you see this

00:06:24 --> 00:06:24

other things

00:06:25 --> 00:06:26

from Damien,

00:06:28 --> 00:06:28

about

00:06:30 --> 00:06:34

and this is not material, but this is not even whatever that the

00:06:34 --> 00:06:39

origin of added everything, but look at this knowledge. The dad

00:06:39 --> 00:06:41

knows his

00:06:42 --> 00:06:43

visitors.

00:06:44 --> 00:06:50

He knows them. He knows how they are, he knows about them.

00:06:52 --> 00:06:55

This is not only the law, the composition embodiment of this is

00:06:55 --> 00:06:57

what you read

00:06:59 --> 00:07:04

from a Potamia. And even if you write my dad, they said the same

00:07:04 --> 00:07:07

things and he said more, just enough to remember everything that

00:07:07 --> 00:07:09

they said. He said even more than this.

00:07:11 --> 00:07:12

This is not even

00:07:13 --> 00:07:20

in in direct way. This is weaker than that. And yet they do not

00:07:20 --> 00:07:25

mind saying such things. As they say you should. And I have many,

00:07:25 --> 00:07:29

many more examples, but the strongest was one of the amygdala

00:07:29 --> 00:07:30

who did not

Share Page