Shadee Elmasry – Hidden Dangers of Perennialism

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the perennialist approach to religion, which is a premise of "monthood" rather than a reality. The importance of understanding the scale of one's opinion and judgment is emphasized. The perennialist movement has been controversial and has been controversial in Europe. The speakers also discuss misunderstandings and quotes from various speakers, including the use of "will" and the need for a "will" concept.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:03 --> 00:00:05

Well, what is the perennial list? First of all the perennial list

00:00:05 --> 00:00:09

are people who hold that there is a truth. And that truth is found

00:00:09 --> 00:00:13

in the different religions, mainly Christianity, Hinduism, they

00:00:13 --> 00:00:16

pretty much ignored Judaism because the Jews don't want any of

00:00:16 --> 00:00:19

this. And Islam, they pretty much are promoting that sometimes they

00:00:19 --> 00:00:22

dabble in Native American religion. I don't even know if

00:00:22 --> 00:00:26

you'd call that religion, Hinduism also, it's not religion. It's like

00:00:26 --> 00:00:30

a plethora of different ideas, that the British ended up naming

00:00:30 --> 00:00:31

Hinduism.

00:00:33 --> 00:00:37

That just basically the ideas of the Hindu Lindt. So the prime is

00:00:37 --> 00:00:41

do believe that there is a truth, okay, and that it's in these

00:00:41 --> 00:00:45

religions, same universal truth. And when it comes to the actual

00:00:45 --> 00:00:49

contradictions within the religions, these religions, they

00:00:49 --> 00:00:53

get fuzzy. And they basically say that there's a mystical reality

00:00:53 --> 00:00:57

above it all. So basically, to ignore your intellect when it

00:00:57 --> 00:01:03

comes to recognizing the linguistic or the doctrinal

00:01:03 --> 00:01:08

differences. And to say that, you know, in order to bring these

00:01:08 --> 00:01:12

ideas down to the level of their culture, or their people or the

00:01:12 --> 00:01:16

intellects of that time, they needed to use this language. So

00:01:16 --> 00:01:21

what one thing that you're faced with is the necessity really, of

00:01:21 --> 00:01:28

suspending your intellect, in favor of a mystical experience

00:01:28 --> 00:01:32

that somebody must have had, that is telling us that it just ignore

00:01:32 --> 00:01:36

all these clear differences like Jesus, is it does a Trinity true,

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38

or is Islamic version true? Okay.

00:01:40 --> 00:01:44

Reincarnation, is that true? Or is the Day of Judgment true? Like

00:01:44 --> 00:01:46

when I die? What's going to happen? Am I going to be judged?

00:01:46 --> 00:01:50

As myself? Or as my soul and mind going to be put into another body?

00:01:51 --> 00:01:56

And if so, what source is informing us of that? And number

00:01:56 --> 00:02:00

two, like, do I remember? Like, if I have this the same soul in the

00:02:00 --> 00:02:03

same body? So is your memory wiped away? Otherwise, you'd remember

00:02:03 --> 00:02:06

who you were, and everyone would be claiming? Hey, I was Elvis. I

00:02:06 --> 00:02:09

was Napoleon. I was getting ISKCON. And if that's not the

00:02:09 --> 00:02:13

case, if the case is that your memories wiped away, and you start

00:02:13 --> 00:02:16

over fresh, then who would have ever known that you're

00:02:16 --> 00:02:20

reincarnated? Right? If your memories wiped fresh, then who's

00:02:20 --> 00:02:22

telling you that you're reincarnated? So they dabble with

00:02:22 --> 00:02:26

these things? And their approach to it is essentially, an anti

00:02:26 --> 00:02:30

rationalist approach, a mystical approach that is, basically it's

00:02:30 --> 00:02:34

not super rational. It's anti rational is basically telling you

00:02:34 --> 00:02:41

don't go the route of the common man's intellect. Okay? And and the

00:02:41 --> 00:02:45

end the literalist jurist intellect, leave that and

00:02:45 --> 00:02:50

recognize that there's a mystical reality above these words. And

00:02:50 --> 00:02:55

above these doctrines. Okay, that is essentially, the premise of

00:02:55 --> 00:02:59

perennialism. And the funny thing about it the reasons that are

00:02:59 --> 00:03:02

these guys extinct, like all my would, have you ever heard of

00:03:02 --> 00:03:05

perennialism? Outside of this? I mean, right now, I'm just taking a

00:03:05 --> 00:03:06

class and rockers like, yeah, just because you know, you have to

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09

fulfill requirements. Yeah. So like a religion class, and they're

00:03:09 --> 00:03:12

going over it. But it's weird, like a lot of people like because

00:03:12 --> 00:03:14

you have this discussion posts, a lot of the people I think they're

00:03:14 --> 00:03:18

leaning towards that, like the perennial list. Most people, they

00:03:18 --> 00:03:22

lean towards a type of perennialism. That's a layman's

00:03:22 --> 00:03:25

perennialism, which is not necessarily just a friend of ism,

00:03:25 --> 00:03:29

it's more like, between perennialism and relativism. So

00:03:29 --> 00:03:33

relativism is like there's not one set of truths, but everyone's got

00:03:33 --> 00:03:36

a little bit of truth. Okay, that's one view. And there's,

00:03:37 --> 00:03:42

there's a think tank zaytuna colleges is gets a lot of funding

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44

from them. I'm not trying to bash a tunic, I'm just saying they get

00:03:44 --> 00:03:49

a lot of funding from them. The founder of that think tank holds

00:03:49 --> 00:03:54

the philosophy that no religion got it got it, right. But every

00:03:54 --> 00:03:58

religion got it a little bit, right. So hold on a second,

00:03:58 --> 00:04:02

wouldn't you need to know what's right, in order to judge these

00:04:02 --> 00:04:05

religions, right? Like these things, there's their logic is

00:04:05 --> 00:04:09

always circular. There's a fund a foundation. It's some rich guy,

00:04:10 --> 00:04:14

who was seems like a nice guy, right? He's some rich guy. And he

00:04:14 --> 00:04:17

was into finding out what the truth is. But like many

00:04:17 --> 00:04:20

businessmen, they make bold claims that are beyond their scope,

00:04:20 --> 00:04:23

right? Like, you shouldn't be making these claims. But he made

00:04:23 --> 00:04:25

the claim, because when you're really rich, you're surrounded by

00:04:25 --> 00:04:28

people who just say, Yeah, that's a great idea. Right? Otherwise,

00:04:28 --> 00:04:32

their paycheck is gonna be in doubt. So he ends up basically

00:04:32 --> 00:04:36

saying that all religions have some truth in it, but none of them

00:04:36 --> 00:04:40

got it fully. Right. You would need to know what's right. So you

00:04:40 --> 00:04:43

got it. Right. Exactly. So you're, you're claiming that you got it

00:04:43 --> 00:04:45

right. You would need to know what is right in order to make that

00:04:45 --> 00:04:50

judgment. Just like who is it that says that? Who was it that says

00:04:50 --> 00:04:51

that?

00:04:52 --> 00:04:56

No, like the followers of of NaVi. I don't need to get in trouble

00:04:56 --> 00:04:59

with them. But you know, I love them and everything but they say

00:04:59 --> 00:05:00

that do

00:05:00 --> 00:05:06

They divide up the Ocala the okul the intellect into the common man,

00:05:06 --> 00:05:09

the mid range intellect, which is the majority of like scholars and

00:05:09 --> 00:05:13

football and Imams, and then the high level intellect, which is the

00:05:13 --> 00:05:17

mystics and stuff. Okay, if that's the case, then you are making a

00:05:17 --> 00:05:22

judgment. Can you show us what the scale is? Right? What's the scale?

00:05:22 --> 00:05:25

Because if they're if you're making a judgment, these guys got

00:05:25 --> 00:05:28

it. These guys are okay. And these guys don't got it. What is the

00:05:28 --> 00:05:32

scale? So we can study the scale, just like saying IQs? Well, you

00:05:32 --> 00:05:36

can give me the exam, I can study for it, I can improve. Same even

00:05:36 --> 00:05:40

to me on the opposite side says logic doesn't benefit people who

00:05:40 --> 00:05:45

are intelligent. They don't need it. And if they're dull, they

00:05:45 --> 00:05:48

don't benefit from it just confuses them. Oh, hold on a

00:05:48 --> 00:05:50

second. So you're telling me that there's really smart people, and

00:05:50 --> 00:05:54

there are adult people? Based on what skill? Did you make that

00:05:54 --> 00:05:58

judgment? Right. Based upon what scoreboard based upon what

00:05:58 --> 00:06:02

measuring stick? Show us the measuring stick? Is that not a

00:06:02 --> 00:06:05

rational statement that you just made? Then it needs a measuring

00:06:05 --> 00:06:09

stick? So I think I'm on both sides. All right. It's me I used

00:06:09 --> 00:06:16

to put away months he downgraded Montek the hypnotic B buttons, as

00:06:16 --> 00:06:21

I understand it, also, they have some downgrades on month up. And

00:06:21 --> 00:06:25

then nd if you get end up with perennialism also is close to the

00:06:25 --> 00:06:28

accordion view. But of course not not even close to that because

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31

like buttons are all Muslims, right? The perennial list view is

00:06:31 --> 00:06:34

not an Islamic view. You as someone who has that as a motet

00:06:34 --> 00:06:36

apostate doesn't directly want to wherever you want to call it not a

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39

not an apostate because he's still saying he's a Muslim. But he says

00:06:39 --> 00:06:44

indeed, they ended up saying that all the fates, it is really not

00:06:44 --> 00:06:47

necessary to make a decision on which face but you need to be

00:06:47 --> 00:06:50

orthodox within each one. You need to be the Orthodox of each

00:06:50 --> 00:06:53

religion in any of the religions and you'll arrive at a great

00:06:53 --> 00:06:54

spiritual reality. So

00:06:56 --> 00:06:59

tough. He puts this together on yaki and read it for yourself. And

00:06:59 --> 00:07:02

here's the thing, I love it and everything but you know what I

00:07:02 --> 00:07:06

love even more perennial lists are extinct. If you're just out there

00:07:06 --> 00:07:10

in the realm of Dawa, just walking around, you don't see them, right?

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13

They have no mother there, who's there? Who are their leaders? Who

00:07:13 --> 00:07:16

are their books, that's all the old generation, there was a

00:07:16 --> 00:07:22

generation in the 60s 70s 50s 60s 70s into the 80s

00:07:22 --> 00:07:25

maybe into the 90s that love this mystical stuff that brought all

00:07:25 --> 00:07:29

the religions together. It seems like it had like two people with

00:07:29 --> 00:07:32

divorced parents of different religions, just looking for

00:07:32 --> 00:07:35

something that brings it all together. And the study of Quran

00:07:35 --> 00:07:42

came out 2015 It got lambasted the sales tanked. Okay, everything was

00:07:42 --> 00:07:46

it really wasn't like a terrible lunch for them. Because they tried

00:07:46 --> 00:07:49

to sneak it in, you know, if they had said, Oh, by the way, this is

00:07:49 --> 00:07:52

the perennial list view. I'd be like, Okay, well, they said it.

00:07:52 --> 00:07:55

Right. They made a clear distinction for the Sunday reader.

00:07:56 --> 00:08:00

But nobody said anything, nor the Sunni Imams who promoted it and

00:08:00 --> 00:08:04

then they didn't say anything they say this great book just keep in

00:08:04 --> 00:08:07

mind there's a plenty of this idea in here that could be acceptable

00:08:07 --> 00:08:10

okay. It probably you know, would it be too many people because

00:08:10 --> 00:08:11

you're still

00:08:13 --> 00:08:17

promoting something that is antithetical to the to our

00:08:17 --> 00:08:20

doctrine or Aki that that Allah wrote down in the Quran. But

00:08:20 --> 00:08:24

nonetheless, at least you could say they pointed it out. Same was

00:08:24 --> 00:08:26

a machete the man has a machete is

00:08:28 --> 00:08:29

right.

00:08:30 --> 00:08:34

Mouth as much as easily right. But it's pointed out it's like well

00:08:34 --> 00:08:38

known nobody. It's like anyone who reads that book knows that. So

00:08:38 --> 00:08:41

they they make it clear, same thing with him. And Kathy, if

00:08:41 --> 00:08:43

you're going to read him to Kathy it, he has on them with a shabby

00:08:43 --> 00:08:47

had some issues. Right, from from our perspective. And so point

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49

being is that

00:08:50 --> 00:08:53

a couple years after that they had a big fitna within their group,

00:08:53 --> 00:08:58

their clique. Right. And, and they are click of intellectuals, very

00:08:58 --> 00:09:01

high level intellectuals in different colleges and

00:09:01 --> 00:09:04

universities, okay. So

00:09:05 --> 00:09:09

on. As a result of that they really just like, deflated, they

00:09:09 --> 00:09:13

deflated. And now, past few years, this is the most attention they're

00:09:13 --> 00:09:16

going to get is from Yaqeen. They got more attention from this

00:09:16 --> 00:09:20

article. I'm not blaming a peon for doing this, or for Kenya for

00:09:20 --> 00:09:23

doing it, you need to have a refutation. But I think they got

00:09:23 --> 00:09:28

more attention from refutations of their illogical ideas and

00:09:28 --> 00:09:31

irrational ideas than he was the only one giving them positive

00:09:31 --> 00:09:35

attention consistently. Is a turn a college I say it as a critique.

00:09:35 --> 00:09:39

Right? This is there. They give it positive attention. They never say

00:09:39 --> 00:09:44

Okay, here it is. But be careful to be careful with these ideas.

00:09:44 --> 00:09:48

They're not Islamic ideas like that little thing. She comes to

00:09:48 --> 00:09:51

himself does it he says it he says people say I'm a perennials I'm

00:09:51 --> 00:09:55

not a perennial list. I mean, he never necessarily explicitly said

00:09:55 --> 00:09:59

it's cool for him. But for what it's worth, he says that he's not

00:09:59 --> 00:09:59

a perennial, so teach

00:10:00 --> 00:10:03

distances himself from that. But he's also not a Hanafy. He's not a

00:10:03 --> 00:10:08

ham buddy. He's not a chef. Right? He's not as ad. Bull not being

00:10:08 --> 00:10:10

something is not a ruling.

00:10:11 --> 00:10:15

Do I care what somebody is? I need to know the ruling, right? These

00:10:15 --> 00:10:18

ideas are kooky ideas. In any event, it should comes into the

00:10:18 --> 00:10:21

need to say it, everyone else is saying it. Okay. This is a cool

00:10:21 --> 00:10:27

furry idea. It is a European ideology that poses itself as the

00:10:27 --> 00:10:32

Judge of all religions, the nerve, right? The judge of all religions,

00:10:32 --> 00:10:36

and he goes deep into the 1600s. And

00:10:37 --> 00:10:40

he goes deep into there. The origins of these ideas, it's a

00:10:40 --> 00:10:46

long is, is he now officially part of 15, or just a contributor,

00:10:46 --> 00:10:48

because he's doing the podcast, he's doing these other things, so

00:10:48 --> 00:10:51

good for him. I like his ideas.

00:10:52 --> 00:10:56

You know, his work in general. And he's got a lot of really good

00:10:57 --> 00:11:01

quotes here from them. And the other guy who's their arch enemy,

00:11:01 --> 00:11:05

what's his name? They all pretend they don't know who he is. And I

00:11:05 --> 00:11:07

forgot his name because I read his book a long time ago. He's a

00:11:07 --> 00:11:10

former perennial list, who had a personal burnout with Martin

00:11:10 --> 00:11:15

lings. And then wrote, like the tell all about the perennial list

00:11:15 --> 00:11:19

like, it is a little bit of a cult, there's a clear and they

00:11:19 --> 00:11:22

never want to come out and say, Hey, we're printing this is our

00:11:22 --> 00:11:25

belief, because illogical, it's an illogical belief. Now, if you're a

00:11:25 --> 00:11:29

Sedgwick, that's his name, Cedric, Mark. I think it's Mark Sedgwick.

00:11:29 --> 00:11:30

Yes, Sedgwick.

00:11:31 --> 00:11:34

Listen up, it's gonna be an hour. If you're a perennial list. If

00:11:34 --> 00:11:39

your perennial is sympathizer, do not dare show up to a molded and

00:11:39 --> 00:11:42

say, Oh, I'm a Sufi. No, don't you are the biggest insults of the

00:11:42 --> 00:11:46

Prophet sallallahu sunnah. Why? Because you try to put icing on

00:11:46 --> 00:11:50

it. See that she's the the right wing guys. They put the poison

00:11:50 --> 00:11:54

right there. It's it's poised. They want you dead. They want you

00:11:54 --> 00:11:57

eliminated the hardcore evangelical Christians, even some

00:11:57 --> 00:12:01

of the Catholics. Catholics aren't all like friendly. Right? I've

00:12:01 --> 00:12:05

been on some Catholic websites and go down to the comments section.

00:12:06 --> 00:12:09

You know, they say things about Muslims, they don't believe it's

00:12:09 --> 00:12:10

true. They just believe it's a falsehood that needs to be

00:12:10 --> 00:12:14

eliminated from the earth. That's their belief. Good. Catholics

00:12:14 --> 00:12:18

aren't always all our friends either. But then, at least those

00:12:18 --> 00:12:22

that it's clear, they're against you period discussion over the

00:12:22 --> 00:12:26

liberals, it doesn't take, you know, too much to realize that

00:12:26 --> 00:12:30

they only like you as a minority identity. That's it. As soon as

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32

you're the majority. And as soon as you're insistent, that is the

00:12:32 --> 00:12:36

truth. And as soon as you forbid, wrong, that they love. They're

00:12:36 --> 00:12:40

your enemies. Right? It took maybe a decade or two for for everyone

00:12:40 --> 00:12:43

to get around to it. But now majority Muslims know that the

00:12:43 --> 00:12:47

Liberals are their enemies, the progressives in these, but these

00:12:47 --> 00:12:53

guys will come in and can fool people for a long for years. For

00:12:53 --> 00:12:56

years, you'll never know if you don't read carefully, the

00:12:56 --> 00:13:01

beautiful flowery covers critique of modernity, right, all wonderful

00:13:01 --> 00:13:05

critiques. That's the best part of them the critique of modernity.

00:13:05 --> 00:13:09

But flowery Sufi covers right, the Sufi path of love and this that

00:13:09 --> 00:13:12

and the other. Right if not to be said this the only quote like

00:13:12 --> 00:13:14

three Islamic scholars, and they don't they heard the quote the

00:13:14 --> 00:13:18

Quran, they never quote a hadith, right? They rarely quote the

00:13:18 --> 00:13:21

Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam. It's one of the signs of a

00:13:21 --> 00:13:25

sunnah and not a sunnah. Okay, so you can be fooled. And at the end

00:13:25 --> 00:13:29

of the day, you do not require Iman and the prophet for

00:13:29 --> 00:13:33

salvation, yes or no? The answer to them is no, we do not require

00:13:33 --> 00:13:37

it for salvation. So don't dare show but anymore. I did. Don't put

00:13:37 --> 00:13:42

you know, anything of this stuff, posting this stuff and talking

00:13:42 --> 00:13:46

about this. As if we love the Prophet. No, you cannot say I love

00:13:46 --> 00:13:49

the Prophet, but I don't believe you don't have to believe him. So

00:13:49 --> 00:13:53

then what is you then did you lie? Oh, it's just relative relative

00:13:53 --> 00:13:56

who's deciding what's relative? If you're deciding what's relative,

00:13:56 --> 00:13:59

you gotta go up, right? You got to rise up above and you'd be an

00:13:59 --> 00:14:05

authority above them. Okay. So this stuff is just, it's nice to

00:14:05 --> 00:14:08

see though that the truth prevails and these silly ideas, honestly,

00:14:09 --> 00:14:14

it's an idea that caught on some people emotionally. They promoted

00:14:14 --> 00:14:19

it for years. Okay. Decades, got in very high positions. But

00:14:19 --> 00:14:23

notice, they can never come out in the light in the open and said, We

00:14:23 --> 00:14:27

apprentice. This is our belief. They may touch upon it here and

00:14:27 --> 00:14:31

there. sneak it in. Oh, the perennial. You know, they never

00:14:31 --> 00:14:35

will never say here's the penniless athlete. Here's our

00:14:35 --> 00:14:40

data. Let's debate it. Let's discuss it. Okay. All right. So

00:14:40 --> 00:14:44

the good job there by Yaqeen for putting that out there. You can

00:14:44 --> 00:14:47

get it just go to it. You want to link it maybe?

00:14:48 --> 00:14:52

Are all religions, the same? Islam and the false promise of

00:14:52 --> 00:14:53

perennialism.

00:14:54 --> 00:14:57

And this was published a couple of days ago. All right. Well done.

00:14:59 --> 00:14:59

Honestly, there's a

00:15:00 --> 00:15:03

There are only a few things that I would say. This is one of the few

00:15:03 --> 00:15:07

things I would say that the tolerance level for it is very

00:15:07 --> 00:15:10

low. It's very low tolerance level for this nonsense.

00:15:11 --> 00:15:15

And and the fact that you try to sneak into this summit community

00:15:15 --> 00:15:18

never come out in the open. And then you've somehow got the

00:15:18 --> 00:15:22

sympathy of Dr. Ahmad who somehow got the sympathy of Sheikh Hamza

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25

Yusuf and they, you know, helped you along and open the door for

00:15:25 --> 00:15:31

you, and neither other coming into different regular normal, or they

00:15:31 --> 00:15:35

say, normative Sunni operations and conferences and teaching as if

00:15:35 --> 00:15:39

this is like just a regular, acceptable scholarship when it's

00:15:39 --> 00:15:43

far from that. I have to say that far from that. But hey, you know,

00:15:43 --> 00:15:47

one thing good about zaytuna college, it's all for everything's

00:15:47 --> 00:15:50

up for critique, right? As long as you bring knowledge, and you bring

00:15:50 --> 00:15:55

a fair critique, good. And so that's they they're accepting of

00:15:55 --> 00:15:57

that, which is why I say it knowing that they're not going to

00:15:57 --> 00:16:01

take it personally. Because when you become a college open up for

00:16:01 --> 00:16:03

fair critique, that's exactly what we gave

Share Page