September 25, 2020

Khalid Yasin

Date:

Channel: Khalid Yasin

File Size: 29.71MB

Episode Notes

Share Page

Transcript ©

AI generated text may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn’t represent Muslim Central's views. Thus,no part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever.

00:00:01--> 00:00:04

tendrils Letho salam ala Rasulillah

00:00:05--> 00:00:10

sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam Allah Allah He was had to he was word you will men will have about.

00:00:12--> 00:00:14

Well Salam aleikum wa rahmatullah with regard to brother Abdullah.

00:00:19--> 00:00:21

And I'm sorry that

00:00:22--> 00:00:24

your colleague, I think,

00:00:25--> 00:00:26

brought up the Rashi.

00:00:30--> 00:00:34

So that's not the correct name. I know that we met.

00:00:38--> 00:00:43

And I really apologize that I'm not getting his name correct.

00:00:44--> 00:00:45

However, I want to

00:00:49--> 00:00:51

I want to thank him for

00:00:53--> 00:01:01

the legal briefing that he did the the legal abstract that he produced,

00:01:03--> 00:01:05

it was very informative and

00:01:06--> 00:01:11

allows us I think, to see that the legal

00:01:13--> 00:01:14

option

00:01:17--> 00:01:17

maybe

00:01:26--> 00:01:30

maybe the legal option is not the way we want to go with this, at this particular time.

00:01:31--> 00:01:33

It seems to be arduous,

00:01:36--> 00:01:37

painstaking

00:01:42--> 00:01:45

will take quite a bit of time and energy

00:01:46--> 00:01:51

and may not produce the desired results in the long run.

00:01:53--> 00:01:54

Because

00:01:55--> 00:01:56

the

00:01:57--> 00:02:00

the subjective legislation

00:02:01--> 00:02:02

in the Western countries

00:02:05--> 00:02:07

in spite of the fact that they might be

00:02:09--> 00:02:10

structured to,

00:02:12--> 00:02:17

to oppose and to prosecute hate crimes.

00:02:18--> 00:02:19

In actuality,

00:02:20--> 00:02:22

the so called freedom of speech

00:02:25--> 00:02:28

is designed to allow

00:02:29--> 00:02:34

people like David Wood and those kinds of people, those provocateurs

00:02:35--> 00:02:45

to say almost anything they want to say. And in the atmosphere that we're living in, if they said the same things about

00:02:46--> 00:02:48

about Israel.

00:02:51--> 00:02:51

And,

00:02:53--> 00:02:55

and about Zionism,

00:02:57--> 00:03:05

they would most certainly be classified as hate crimes. But because it's aimed at Islam and Muslims,

00:03:07--> 00:03:09

we would have to climb uphill

00:03:10--> 00:03:13

and maybe even after that still uphill,

00:03:14--> 00:03:21

to be able to prove that this is actually hate speech. So I think that the way forward

00:03:22--> 00:03:26

is not to expend a lot of our time and energy

00:03:27--> 00:03:28

trying to

00:03:34--> 00:03:35

approach this from a

00:03:37--> 00:03:38

from a legal perspective.

00:03:40--> 00:03:53

So I want to continue my discussion with you about the dignified response to the islamophobe provocateurs and give you an update on what I've done.

00:03:54--> 00:04:04

And what I'm in the process of putting together as what I consider to be a viable approach to this particular issue.

00:04:06--> 00:04:16

Number one, I think that we have to approach this from a very clinical point of view and that we don't allow ourselves to be drawn into

00:04:19--> 00:04:23

mudslinging, like, some of the

00:04:25--> 00:04:32

if we want to call them Muslim daddies or Muslim propagators,

00:04:33--> 00:04:34

especially in the UK,

00:04:36--> 00:04:41

have been drawn into and it might be worthy to say at this point that

00:04:43--> 00:04:45

the UK has a certain

00:04:47--> 00:04:48

characteristic.

00:04:49--> 00:04:52

When it comes to these kinds of arguments,

00:04:53--> 00:04:59

we don't find we don't find Muslim preachers or teachers or dads

00:05:00--> 00:05:05

A diet, we don't find them talking that way.

00:05:07--> 00:05:13

In response to these provocateurs, like we find those in the UK, UK has a special

00:05:17--> 00:05:27

I think the word is preponderance towards reacting to this kind of provocation.

00:05:29--> 00:05:30

And those young

00:05:32--> 00:05:39

I would say ideologically immature individuals who are responding,

00:05:40--> 00:05:47

they just adding fuel to the fire and the provocateurs, they like

00:05:48--> 00:06:09

to agitate, aggravate and provoke those immature ideologically immature, intellectually immature Muslims, because it produces the result that they want. And as a matter of fact,

00:06:10--> 00:06:11

it's very clear

00:06:12--> 00:06:16

that there is a hidden hand behind these provoca tools,

00:06:17--> 00:06:19

a hidden hand that

00:06:22--> 00:06:24

perhaps funds them,

00:06:26--> 00:06:27

supports them

00:06:30--> 00:06:31

pushes them

00:06:34--> 00:06:39

to create this kind of provocation with the aim of getting

00:06:41--> 00:06:42

a

00:06:44--> 00:06:46

some kind of a profound

00:06:48--> 00:06:49

aggravated

00:06:51--> 00:06:51

reaction

00:06:53--> 00:06:55

which would justify their

00:06:57--> 00:06:59

taking some other steps

00:07:00--> 00:07:14

in the UK society, in particular, in Europe, in particular, against Islam and Muslims. So, we have to be very careful that we are not one of those people who react to this provocation.

00:07:15--> 00:07:16

So, number one,

00:07:17--> 00:07:20

we have to select these provocateurs,

00:07:21--> 00:07:32

there seems to be four or five. Now, we need to make a very clear distinction between islamophobe provocateurs and the the conventional,

00:07:34--> 00:07:36

prominent or eminent

00:07:39--> 00:07:46

Islamophobes in the 21st century, there are seven eight or nine

00:07:49--> 00:07:51

people intellectual

00:07:52--> 00:07:53

Orientalist

00:07:55--> 00:08:03

who are who we would classify as Islamophobes, but based upon the dialectics their writings,

00:08:06--> 00:08:07

but the intellectuals

00:08:09--> 00:08:18

and we can approach them and they have been approached and they have we have been interacting with them for some years, in a very intellectual way.

00:08:19--> 00:08:28

That can be continued. So, we have to distinguish the islamophobe provoca tours from those conventional Islamophobes.

00:08:30--> 00:08:34

Next, we have to showcase their claims their behavior

00:08:36--> 00:08:37

by

00:08:38--> 00:08:41

dissecting their lectures,

00:08:42--> 00:08:43

their social media

00:08:44--> 00:08:45

narratives

00:08:47--> 00:08:48

and showcase

00:08:50--> 00:08:51

their claims

00:08:53--> 00:08:55

and where their claims involve

00:08:58--> 00:08:59

noteworthy

00:09:03--> 00:09:07

issues we should simply just respond to them

00:09:09--> 00:09:13

and do so objectively not subjectively.

00:09:15--> 00:09:18

And where their behavior

00:09:20--> 00:09:27

goes into cursing, maligning, slandering, castigating

00:09:32--> 00:09:40

and hateful rhetoric against Islam and Muslims and the Quran and Muhammad Sallallahu wasallam.

00:09:42--> 00:09:47

We should highlight that behavior and classify it as it is

00:09:49--> 00:09:52

without responding in kind

00:09:54--> 00:09:55

number three

00:09:58--> 00:09:59

we should recruit refute

00:10:00--> 00:10:13

their claims categorically. So whatever their claims are, regarding the Quran, regarding whatever their claims are regarding Muhammad Sallallahu wasallam. Whatever their false claims are in regards to Islam,

00:10:14--> 00:10:22

we should refute their claims categorically. And there's a difference between behavior and claims.

00:10:25--> 00:10:38

And we should utilize all the existing materials which have addressed these provocateurs in the past. So there are a number of individuals,

00:10:39--> 00:10:45

noteworthy individuals, respected individuals who have responded to

00:10:46--> 00:10:47

these

00:10:49--> 00:10:50

provocateurs,

00:10:51--> 00:10:54

both Muslims and non Muslims.

00:10:55--> 00:11:00

And we should use those materials without having to reinvent the wheel.

00:11:03--> 00:11:20

We should also prepare an intellectual treatise on the subject matter including examination of the pathology, assessment and treatment, we should make a diagnosis and prognosis towards this, this issue for other people to

00:11:21--> 00:11:23

to understand and make reference to.

00:11:24--> 00:11:29

And lastly, we should have a dignified response. Now, I've already begun that task.

00:11:32--> 00:11:35

I am preparing sort of like a white paper

00:11:36--> 00:11:46

on the pathology of Islamophobia. And inside of that I have a particular approach towards the provocateurs.

00:11:47--> 00:11:52

I'm hoping that I'll finish this within the next week.

00:11:53--> 00:12:03

It also happens to be one of the chapters in my book Islam, America and the world. Now, some notes on each of these points.

00:12:07--> 00:12:09

When it comes to selecting the provoca tours,

00:12:11--> 00:12:26

we we again, I want to just emphasize that we have to distinguish the 21st century Islamophobes from the recent phenomena of the provoca tours, the the provocateurs have, sort of they have

00:12:28--> 00:12:29

just taken root

00:12:30--> 00:12:32

in the last seven years,

00:12:34--> 00:12:45

seven years ago 2013 thereabouts. These provocateurs would generally unknown people,

00:12:47--> 00:12:52

but they began their provocations five or six years ago and

00:12:53--> 00:12:54

and

00:12:55--> 00:12:57

mostly young,

00:12:58--> 00:13:01

inexperienced, non intellectual

00:13:07--> 00:13:15

Street, dour Muslims began responding back to them and reacting back to them and this kind of give

00:13:16--> 00:13:18

this kind of gave rise

00:13:19--> 00:13:31

and even brought some notoriety to these individuals. And so in the last three years, they have become more they've become bolder

00:13:32--> 00:13:34

or emboldened

00:13:36--> 00:13:42

and more arrogant, more blatant, and more vicious in what they say because

00:13:45--> 00:13:47

fuel is being poured onto the fire.

00:13:50--> 00:13:51

Number two,

00:13:52--> 00:13:57

regarding the highlighting of or showcasing their claims

00:14:02--> 00:14:08

we should take excerpts which characterize and summarize these provocative claims.

00:14:11--> 00:14:13

But and and show

00:14:15--> 00:14:17

one the characteristic

00:14:19--> 00:14:20

the behavior

00:14:23--> 00:14:28

and indicate that they do not have the integrity,

00:14:30--> 00:14:34

the intellectual integrity to even be responded to.

00:14:37--> 00:14:40

And again, the reason being

00:14:41--> 00:14:50

that they have not been formulated in a very dignified way to be responded to in a dignified way.

00:14:53--> 00:14:57

And three when it comes to refuting their claims.

00:14:58--> 00:15:00

We need to avoid react

00:15:00--> 00:15:04

reactions to their provocations, just refute the claims.

00:15:05--> 00:15:15

When we don't have to mention the individual, we shouldn't shouldn't no need to mention the individual give the person more notoriety than they deserve.

00:15:16--> 00:15:20

Just refute their claims and avoid reactions.

00:15:23--> 00:15:37

We can create a set of video links and publications which have categorically addressed these challenges made by the provocateurs. You know, I think in the last 20 years in particular,

00:15:38--> 00:15:41

there is a very, there is a plethora

00:15:42--> 00:15:47

of video links and publications written by qualified

00:15:50--> 00:16:00

highly educated Muslims, about these claims the claims of the Islamophobes and claim of the provocateurs So, we should create a set of

00:16:03--> 00:16:09

video links and publications that we can offer the public as a reference.

00:16:12--> 00:16:14

As I mentioned, I have been writing

00:16:17--> 00:16:20

and there is a chapter in my book

00:16:22--> 00:16:25

Islam America in the world called the pathology of Islamophobia.

00:16:27--> 00:16:30

And I am adding

00:16:32--> 00:16:32

another

00:16:34--> 00:16:36

section to that dealing with the

00:16:38--> 00:16:38

the

00:16:40--> 00:16:41

phenomena of

00:16:45--> 00:16:46

the

00:16:49--> 00:16:52

the provocateurs, the the

00:16:53--> 00:17:00

the Islamophobia, provocateurs, so, I'm giving special attention to that,

00:17:01--> 00:17:08

since this is a phenomena that has a beast that has raised its head

00:17:09--> 00:17:11

in the last three years,

00:17:13--> 00:17:14

in particular,

00:17:15--> 00:17:18

so I'm hoping to finish that paper,

00:17:19--> 00:17:22

dealing with the Islamophobia provoca tours

00:17:25--> 00:17:27

probably within the next 10 days in sha Allah.

00:17:29--> 00:17:34

And when I finish that, I will deliver it

00:17:35--> 00:17:37

in a two part series

00:17:38--> 00:17:49

as a as a presentation, a video presentation. And I'm sure that when that happens those provocateurs, they will then turn some attention towards myself

00:17:52--> 00:17:54

with their usual viciousness,

00:17:56--> 00:18:04

but I will not be responding to them. It's just we will put out what we want to put out for our public

00:18:06--> 00:18:13

and especially for unwitting Muslims, so that they can equip themselves with

00:18:14--> 00:18:18

and understand the phenomena as it as it exists.

00:18:22--> 00:18:29

We need to recruit and include responses to the provocateurs by well known

00:18:30--> 00:18:44

non Muslim intellectuals, we should want to emphasize that that we need to recruit and include responses to these provocateurs by well known non Muslim intellectuals

00:18:45--> 00:18:52

and there are many who do not agree with this behavior and they have responded

00:18:53--> 00:18:55

they have written or they have spoken

00:18:57--> 00:19:00

about that. So, we should include that. Now.

00:19:02--> 00:19:05

It is, it is unfortunate

00:19:07--> 00:19:08

that

00:19:09--> 00:19:10

the

00:19:11--> 00:19:15

the well educated, popular

00:19:20--> 00:19:27

teachers or diet in the Muslim world, in the English language

00:19:28--> 00:19:35

is unfortunate that until now, they have not formed any kind of a union or platform

00:19:37--> 00:19:38

to be able to

00:19:40--> 00:19:49

synthesize or synchronize their talents, their sources, their tools

00:19:50--> 00:19:53

to deal with the onslaught of Islamophobia.

00:19:55--> 00:19:59

Whether it be the the atheists who are

00:20:00--> 00:20:00

So,

00:20:01--> 00:20:06

who are doing tremendous damage in the Muslim world.

00:20:07--> 00:20:09

And we should take note of this

00:20:11--> 00:20:15

the damage that the atheists, the dialectical

00:20:18--> 00:20:20

the dielectric materials,

00:20:21--> 00:20:24

the damage that they are

00:20:28--> 00:20:36

the damage that they are giving or that they are causing in the Muslim world is unbelievable.

00:20:39--> 00:20:42

There's a statistic that says

00:20:43--> 00:20:50

that one out of seven young Muslims in the western universities

00:20:52--> 00:20:54

have yielded have

00:20:57--> 00:20:58

condescended

00:20:59--> 00:21:04

when compromised by the arguments of the atheists.

00:21:05--> 00:21:20

So, if we were to look at that statistic, and this statistic is it maybe it's a guesstimate, maybe it's not a statistic, maybe it's just a guesstimate. But even if it is just a guesstimate that is absolutely profound.

00:21:22--> 00:21:33

That means that one out of seven young men and women who are going to the Western universities, mean who are in the universities in the Muslim countries

00:21:35--> 00:21:53

and who leave their countries and come to the west to attend to universities, one out of seven of them are being penetrated or compromised, in the Islamic belief, by the challenges of the atheists, the dialectical materialist,

00:21:55--> 00:21:58

this is a staggering statistic or guesstimate.

00:22:01--> 00:22:02

And without

00:22:03--> 00:22:08

getting fixed on that statistic, we have to admit

00:22:09--> 00:22:11

that we have not addressed this issue properly.

00:22:13--> 00:22:20

So, these are not necessarily conventional Islamophobes these are people who are simply atheists.

00:22:22--> 00:22:26

They are the so called no God, no religion people

00:22:28--> 00:22:33

and they have created dialectical arguments to support their

00:22:34--> 00:22:35

their

00:22:36--> 00:22:43

behavior, their thinking, and Muslims have not sufficiently

00:22:44--> 00:22:48

addressed the young people or themselves

00:22:49--> 00:22:54

to deal with their dialectics. So, this is one issue.

00:22:56--> 00:22:59

The Islamophobes who themselves have a

00:23:01--> 00:23:02

Eros, irrational

00:23:03--> 00:23:04

historical

00:23:07--> 00:23:09

hatred for Islam and Muslims.

00:23:10--> 00:23:18

This is another set of challenges within themselves that that is affecting the Muslim world.

00:23:20--> 00:23:25

Because these Islamophobes they are in every circle, they have penetrated every circle

00:23:27--> 00:23:31

whether it be the government, whether it be the universities,

00:23:33--> 00:23:35

whether it be the media,

00:23:38--> 00:23:41

they are in every circle.

00:23:45--> 00:23:47

And in most cases, they are

00:23:48--> 00:23:49

very intellectual people.

00:23:54--> 00:23:55

Most cases, they are very

00:23:59--> 00:24:00

well renowned,

00:24:03--> 00:24:04

educated

00:24:05--> 00:24:08

people who who lecture

00:24:09--> 00:24:13

who make up who create publications,

00:24:15--> 00:24:16

who challenged

00:24:17--> 00:24:20

who advise governments and who advise

00:24:22--> 00:24:23

industrial bodies

00:24:25--> 00:24:31

and the Muslim preachers, teachers, the conventional scholars

00:24:35--> 00:24:36

have barely whispered

00:24:38--> 00:24:39

a response to them.

00:24:42--> 00:24:46

So this is what we're up against. Now, these these these these

00:24:49--> 00:24:51

this unethical

00:24:52--> 00:24:53

Well, belligerent

00:24:57--> 00:25:00

provocative tours are just like this

00:25:00--> 00:25:01

Just religious hoodlums.

00:25:05--> 00:25:09

While they do not deserve us to

00:25:11--> 00:25:15

react to them at all, they don't even deserve a reaction.

00:25:16--> 00:25:19

However, they do deserve a response.

00:25:21--> 00:25:25

We should not underestimate people who throw stones or missiles,

00:25:27--> 00:25:28

they have to be responded to.

00:25:31--> 00:25:33

And I think that our

00:25:35--> 00:25:35

effort

00:25:37--> 00:25:47

should first be to do as much as we are able to do. And when I say we now I'm talking about the three of us, and we should try to duplicate ourselves.

00:25:48--> 00:26:01

Once we clearly agree as to what we want to do, and we're willing to take this bull by the horns, we should be we should be looking to duplicate ourselves because it's a very big job.

00:26:04--> 00:26:06

And in duplicating ourselves,

00:26:07--> 00:26:10

we should be trying to come up with a template

00:26:12--> 00:26:15

that that can be

00:26:16--> 00:26:19

marketed, distributed,

00:26:20--> 00:26:25

it can become more sophisticated, so that at some point,

00:26:26--> 00:26:31

it becomes a very comprehensive platform or a comprehensive

00:26:33--> 00:26:34

reference

00:26:35--> 00:26:41

to be able to address the atheist, the threat of atheism,

00:26:42--> 00:26:49

the threat of Islamophobia, and the threat of the Islamophobic provocateurs

00:26:50--> 00:26:56

because I think that Sheikh Ahmed Deedat author Allahu Allah and Sheikh

00:26:59--> 00:27:01

Dr. Zakir Naik

00:27:02--> 00:27:05

and others have done a wonderful job

00:27:06--> 00:27:08

in addressing

00:27:11--> 00:27:12

the Christians

00:27:14--> 00:27:17

in their false beliefs in

00:27:18--> 00:27:20

religious dogmas.

00:27:22--> 00:27:24

And we can see

00:27:25--> 00:27:27

that the

00:27:28--> 00:27:35

the work of an individual in the case of Dr. Amin Sheikh Ahmed Deedat, the work of one individual

00:27:37--> 00:27:39

for over 35 years

00:27:41--> 00:27:45

and then the work of Dr. Zakir Naik for the past 20 years.

00:27:49--> 00:28:05

Over the period of 55 years, it was principally two individuals. Now, of course, there were others, some of their students and but principally we can say the era of Sheikh Ahmed Deedat and the era of Dr. Zakir Naik

00:28:07--> 00:28:09

who surgically

00:28:11--> 00:28:12

efficiently

00:28:14--> 00:28:15

dealt with the

00:28:16--> 00:28:17

the threat

00:28:18--> 00:28:20

and the deviation

00:28:21--> 00:28:24

of Christian dogma

00:28:27--> 00:28:34

in regards to the their understanding of Islam and their understanding of the

00:28:35--> 00:28:42

of the Christian religion and doctrines, these two individuals they did a phenomenal

00:28:43--> 00:28:48

job. So just shows what an individual can do

00:28:51--> 00:28:54

in this case, now I think this three pronged threat

00:28:57--> 00:28:58

is not something for an individual

00:29:00--> 00:29:07

it's probably not something even for the three of us to be trying to, to thinking about addressing

00:29:09--> 00:29:10

but I think three of us

00:29:12--> 00:29:22

know because we come from three different coming from three different approaches. One a legal pragmatic approach, another one for myself

00:29:23--> 00:29:24

a

00:29:26--> 00:29:26

a

00:29:29--> 00:29:30

a research based

00:29:32--> 00:29:33

dialectical

00:29:37--> 00:29:42

narrative approach. And in the case of yourself, Abdullah

00:29:44--> 00:29:46

mashallah you have a unique

00:29:47--> 00:29:51

in listening to your presentations and knowing you as an individual,

00:29:52--> 00:29:54

you have a unique skill

00:29:56--> 00:29:59

that you should continue to hone in

00:30:00--> 00:30:01

A sophisticate

00:30:03--> 00:30:09

and I think that each of us can duplicate ourselves, we can reach out

00:30:11--> 00:30:21

once, once the template becomes clear, I don't think that we should reach out and draw other people until our template is pretty clear.

00:30:22--> 00:30:24

So, these are my comments

00:30:25--> 00:30:32

to you two brothers and I want to thank both of you for

00:30:33--> 00:30:35

trusting me and

00:30:37--> 00:30:49

and entrusting my idea about this particular approach. And I will be waiting for your comments. And as I mentioned within the next 10 days,

00:30:51--> 00:31:05

I will be given to you or make giving access to you to two things one, my chapter one the pathology of Islamophobia. And then my

00:31:07--> 00:31:12

my dignified response to the Islamophobic provoca tours

00:31:14--> 00:31:19

mean as regard to the the the threat of the atheists.

00:31:20--> 00:31:24

I think this is a totally different issue.

00:31:25--> 00:31:28

But it is part of the three pronged

00:31:29--> 00:31:31

attack on Islam.

00:31:32--> 00:31:34

And make no mistake about it.

00:31:37--> 00:31:39

It is a well designed

00:31:41--> 00:31:42

attack on Islam.

00:31:44--> 00:31:46

In this case, it's a three pronged attack.

00:31:48--> 00:31:51

So please get back to me. Let me know what your thoughts are.

00:31:52--> 00:32:04

We asked a loss of home fellow to give us strength and consistency in the work that we're doing. Somebody could Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh Subhanallah loving what you

00:32:05--> 00:32:05

want to share

00:32:07--> 00:32:11

with us to stop for a corner to Warwick or Salam aleikum wa rahmatullah wa barakato.