Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 10
Channel: Jamal Zarabozo
File Size: 19.11MB
This is the 10th
because that's just in the end, I finish all this stuff in a lecture.
course we skipped for Jeff.
Where did we leave off?
now we'll talk about the unknown
definition of logical or unknown narrator according to the scores of headings does anyone
of the above anything, anyone who
is not known to study headed to have been a student dependent
anyone whom the scores are not aware of
anyone who had only one person nary Teddy for
anyone who had only one person married Peggy.
And the fourth one is anyone who is not known for carrying knowledge.
Although he may be known for other things, for example, medic,
was one known preserved but you will not know
anyone who has only one person Narrator
In other words, to remove the condition of data or
being a node
needs to be
amongst the people who are considered unknown members as a condition and in the basic and always keep these things in mind. Or to accept the narrator.
The two most important things that we're looking for always keep these in mind.
We have three sets,
am someone who
The scores are not able to
describe or identify exactly who this person is.
In other words, his name might be found in some chain, some
stores do not know who
his name might be, they might be in the chain.
But they have no idea who
they might just know the name of the
request. And of course, if they don't even know a name, or they want to talk about
they're unable to identify who he is, who is this person, when did he then for his show, who studied with him
he was above this category.
gonna set the narrative
it is the two conditions. We have no idea who these people are.
Okay, as long as you know.
Yeah, of course we're talking.
I mean, they're not, they're not meant to do for someone they don't know.
Okay? This is a problem here
for this person
from the chain or from the people who are married to this person that's from the first three generations and
obviously these from the first three generations.
Does that make any
sense? Does it make a difference?
lose that you do not know what
if you know for sure he's the homies even if you don't know
if he's one of the Sahaba close as soon as you cannot be not necessarily always assume but what we know from them, what we described earlier, always very careful.
And he would accept that person happy. But at the same time, we would compare it to other people
talking about the case where you know the person that's
the problem with this is some of the people especially the Hennepin
they say that it's from the first three generations
to have a tendency to accept
in general the
most the scholars of hate except for those who are happy, they reject this
is a very weak opinion, because we know from this domain there are some there is
accepted. If if they if there is no proof that
have you been writing today, or any?
Melinda is one of looked as written articles trying to prove that this
isn't a feud in many tests.
But there's also another
the second one
this is someone who we know who he is.
We know exactly who this person is.
But we have no idea whether he was
and we know who he is. We know where he lives. We have an idea of who was
pure but we do not have any idea whether he
because I will
require some investigation.
We don't just say someone's Island just because we saw Greg in the mosque.
Organic is from these people who don't really know
where she got it from those people who are willing
to not accept these.
Except for again, the first generation
the one which is most different opinions.
What do we mean by this? The more
you know, ladies and
Young, he has private lessons, but no,
we don't we only we see him, he goes to the mosque and we see him.
But we really don't know any private
In other words, for narratives to be just in general, we really have to know them.
Oh, yeah, that's my question.
Let me ask you, is there any reason to assume that someone is either going to proven guilty?
We assume someone do we have an advantage?
Especially in the third case, got it.
Oh, in other words, any
question at the theoretical question.
Should we assume? Should we assume that someone is born other life should we have done for him and therefore assume that
he needs to be
Good. Yeah. It doesn't have to be
black and white.
That's why the cones
work. We don't know.
Exactly. But if they're supported by other people, we may we may.
We know that.
They're supported by other people.
headings are not supported.
Question, what have you been had to answer was the someone become an acceptable narrator? due to some information that he has either or any become an acceptable narrator because there's no information?
That's what this question was, does.
He does he have to be proven to be either or just the fact that we have no information that is sufficient
to discover this master?
What did I say?
we asked that question?
As long as there's no proof that
he doesn't have to be proven,
because we know
tendency to accept to accept this route.
Except that group if there's no
really no strange,
no reject, there's no rejected, at least not to be married by these people.
And he puts these people
in his book.
He has a collection of narratives that he calls
and he includes these people.
In other words he has, so if there's no proof against them that
this is normal.
So that's why it is
that many narratives that other scholars do not consider.
will not be stuck with people
until they're proven to be
So it would have been a little bit of what I said at this point is lack
of those who are
was the before and
And generally it does dealer from
remember, we had rankings
with someone else in focus. So these people must have had will be done here. And the second time
this is our time.
Any questions about
how can someone be removed from being concerned with
that question? And the answer is, is as unless proven.
To everyone else, is it to not consider
how there's no one held as someone removed from being considered.
A study these guys get married.
There are two sets of narrators narrated from him is no longer considered,
But this does not mean automatically that attendees are
just not no longer considered unknown.
marry from someone, in
other words, we don't put him in the category of unknown people.
him, is considered known, but that doesn't mean that he would consider himself
further proof to show that he
is no longer considered unknown.
And as I pointed out to
as I pointed out, earlier,
sometimes you have to be careful when you call someone unknown.
You should do some research into it.
Find that someone is unknown and they could not determine or do enough research they might say that I do not know this narrative
that's different from calling you
measurement would mean that research has been done and you could not find this guy in discord during his time said that he has multiple lowers his number of students attending
difference between someone saying I know this person and calling him
out when he writes me this many
you cannot come across in most of the books of biography
I'm sure they're in some books of biography but many most of the popular books
economics you cannot find.
So sometimes he works quickly. So many times you'll say that until now, I haven't found this Narrator In any book, or I'm reading my books
is not the one originally narrating it taking it from?
I don't know I don't know.
Which is different from him saying the visionary as much
as I mentioned, for example, if it hasn't
been merging with who
someone might be much too one score, but
obviously if you find one score saying that the person's misquoted the other ones things that
And he was the one who says that this means he has information that the other person doesn't have
any luck someone says
someone else's company just ignore
Can you call the
just written a letter to anyone in the family but hasn't was he did not travel to Spain.
He did not travel to Spain to Spain
had a letter to anyone in the
Middle East. They wouldn't even been able to send them copies.
So he was making judgment.
Many questions about
always want to talk about we talk in those terms. We're always talking about someone who's qualified to make mistakes.
And we get qualifications for credit.
Always anyone we talked about talking about among those people who are qualified.
The next category are liars.
If someone is an expert in memory and recording it doesn't matter. It knows to be a liar. All of his headaches were are to be rejected and is known even just applied once.
That all gets rejected.
like in general
with respect to fabricating heavy
fabricating heavy investment, according to your textbook,
remember the textbook?
Yeah, actually assume he says that the punishments for any fabricating hobbyist has to be put to death.
There have been some people
some failures and the punishment, they don't discuss whether it's
And if someone narrates it, which is obviously mistaken.
Point out to him his mistake. There's no excuse me.
And the person refuses to admit the mistake or two sub narrating that he that he is one that he is considered one of the liars.
Also, the problem we find nowadays and someone knows the disparities and it continues to narrower than any other heading that is one of the largest
and because you're you're saying and in the process of consensus, when you have been told the scars say for sure the
for sure this
has nothing to do with
if you trust Him, and you think he has some policy
then yeah, you should start learning how to you
know support someone
suppose someone someone does
not need any luck
and later we make
can we now have simplicity
and improve the life you get something illegally returned to the person who
used to drink alcohol
in case you say what about the case of like
in the case of like some sort of say an endeavor except
now we we may accept this toolbar, but we'll consider him a week.
Consider Wi Fi supported by others.
Now there used to be a group of people
don't remember the name
but they used to consider it hello to fabricate
report exhorting people to do things and intimidating
and they get the heaviest monkey in the body here.
We are not
So if someone is like that guy he believes
and then he's showing anything wrong and then he makes to work
then as long as there's someone like that you could accept
that what was with that is it's a very dangerous decision because the you might say okay, we've slipped into
someone like yours I need this use of gravity and not be able to distinguish between so you have to be careful in that situation but there were any
about 200 years old there were some people who believe
daddy wasn't very careful
and you don't look on the liar anymore.
is best avoided.
Me they believe the
advocate for of the gene and
make up something
you make something
But you take something which is known as the religion and you just take it if you do this, do you get to
Yeah, there's a certain amount of buzz unfortunately, I think I recorded in the chapter.
Question about Mars
in my opinion,
Yeah, I mean, even as he changes,
was made clear
by those who commit the disease,
the storytellers and
worshipers who are not people who
will discuss them.
Now we've come to careless or mistake prone or lenient scenarios.
And even though someone may be odd
when they're very
many people might be either they might be very good Muslims, but anyone that comes to passing on information.
As I said, earlier, I mentioned earlier, if someone does not mind for example, to sleep or glasses while listening to lecture or this kind of thing.
For those young people who do not compare the copies with the original text will be sort of
divided all narrators into four categories.
The four categories that you mentioned are the most, this is all very divided all marriage and divorce are those that have been accused of lying
accused of lying, but their durations
and durations are full of errors and mistakes
in the logic divided all narratives into four categories
those who have been accused of lying,
those that have not been accused of lying, but their narrations are poor mistakes.
Those are honest, but they admit mistakes although their mistake they are not mistaken Muslims
have not been accused of lying know what they are.
But there is a
third they are honest and they can make some mistakes, but not
the people who are
experts rarely ever,
details and I thought only four mistakes.
So, these four
obviously the third and fourth category.
Obviously, the first category
is with a second category
to how to deal with that second category which are us people but they make lots of mistakes.
Do we reject all the
other words down here they are supported by others?
You have to realize of course that
the guy who falls into that second category has to question that he had
because as I said what is a lot of mistakes to one person may not be lost
just a few mistakes and that was
one of the clothes and refuse to
answer the question that he had was there's a lot of mistakes and that's one reason why you might find different statements from different schools and soon seen
people make lots of mistakes.
there any way we will
respect them for their honesty and if they are supported by
the expert certification.
Next category are those people who make
you have two people force of similar quality
They both make mistakes.
They both support each other as they get closer. If you find two other people who are similar to them, and all for that there isn't the same way, then the possibility of them having made an error, and then there is
so so yeah, the way you were thinking about it is, you mean, you think someone better than them and support
people of equipment?
earlier, this was
those people who missed Harry's in their, in their old age, for example.
And someone used to be that he started losing his mental capabilities.
Because I put three into one, just put them on Yeah.
Now what do we do about these
that if you are certain that someone heard it from him before, he says losing is meant to give.
By the way, as I mentioned earlier, that usually was the family of the person, when they start seeing the person started going a little bit. And they kind of closed the doors and don't allow people to come in.
But there are some people who still continue their narrative even though
By the way, not just because of all these, but something may have happened in his life that made him lose his most
looking at my notes again,
books after that, and before that, he was a little bit weak.
But if he never bought any books or whatever, then he lost all of his books, and he can't even go and like overdose or anything.
after the after the burning of his house, he was still very heavy, but she could not get anything.
So it doesn't mean just
as it was
before he was weak, but
that means there's some cause they use it Yeah, in the case of some
like the burning down of his house and all those books may have also had some psychological effect.
Now what about someone
is the first sociology associate
narrated by the name when
he said he was living in
when you move to a bigger city, so anyone who heard this hate and Cooper was also
anyone who heard it
So what about if we don't know? And we don't have to make a vlog
every so often, but we have no idea when the night before or after.
It's supposed to just sit by himself.
Because then he talks about these things.
eddies were between hesitant and strong. We can
relate to this topic we realize what's the difference between
when the scores of hideous say that someone's heavies are monka?
he narrates the next one.
you like Medicare?
He received a raise.
Okay. That's what we're that's what we're trying to do. I said we have to distinguish between these features.
I'll just tell you what three,
according to the earlier stones going to the 30 stores
that's only narrated from one person
even if that person has stepped up, it means Canada degenerating in such a way that the other people do not marry.
Actually, you can find that
the lowest was used this word is this term. And
to me, this is generated by owning and controlling restaurants.
So we have to understand the first case we have to distinguish between what the
earliest had been on before
They say you've got a headache
or is heavy.
This is stated by
the heart he was very kindness in the words the team's never call anyone a liar.
He tries to be very soft.
If a salt says about someone.
This means this person's hate to be rejected.
General MacArthur is a description of the very
description of an area that
are to be rejected.
That the first one, the first one, as I said,
if you're talking about the early generations, that doesn't necessarily mean even as the rejected thing.
So let's move on to talking about the person. The guy he is a very weak narrative.
in the terminology of the leaders
The third one is the dimension here relates Medicare
k now this is not a description of the merrier.
In other words, you're not saying that the narrative is weak
to say about someone that you relate to, but here we are not saying that this.
But the person may be
what he has some shadow some strange reports, the solitary reports that are
30. Related is some rejected. Sometimes it's the case that she narrated Medicare, but he himself
but he knows Medicare was rejected
from the people
he wishes himself enough distinguish between
nice and simple, it is definitely just testing on the information he got.
So when they say the key replacement of key, it doesn't necessarily mean that in fact, most likely they're using for that for some of them.
what this means is that
if you if you come across this case,
you might find some hate that the strengths
are that they're not people that were rejected.
It means this is not the ones to be blamed for that
or either in Solitaire reports, once in which is different with other people are rejected, but otherwise.
is not this is not a description of an area as being a weakness
does not mean that he's a weakness.
As in the case of
all marriages are made.
Not all one category, but they're different categories and again, and it discloses
the first very small principles, I wanted to put it all in one place.
This is what made me a little bit late.
I asked the software to print 17 copies and software has to download copies of all the fonts.
personally make all the corrections
have noticed that he has six categories again with
again, yeah, the earliest stars had no we had five
as you go down from the first category
any questions about any of those terms
start with grief and
we're still going down. And before we started with the best went down to the almost half, we could have prevented now we're starting with that
from the third category down
The first category here, you might have done
if this is the only thing that they gave us
first of all supporting evidence
that removes the doubt of positivity
The first group are terms that are that are sets of different
terms that are not that harsh. For example, there are some statements about him and he has weaknesses and criticizes some discussion in
word I can come up with a
category that the terms get a little bit stronger like we rejected him he never
get stronger The next category bear
with me, that's why
that's why the
third category stronger very weak did not record any other words the nothing
is nothing is not worth anything
are not allowed to ericom
Yeah, pretty much.
The fourth one
fourth one is Gani firms just short of calling the very low like is implemented or
excuse a fifth one
Wrong again like liar, antichrist forger. And the sixth category are those people who are an extremist when it comes to fortune at the greatest layer of people is extremely
long term by the way
use the term a lot
in this particular book, you will find a similar
the second port Edward
cold, very weak,
very good guy we don't have
hundreds of them.
We're fairly certain that there's not too many
but who cannot use any one of them while the last two categories that are considered canny fabricated
that's what makes
wrong with this
a very weak because we cannot trust how we go.
what does this term mean?
In this book?
What does this term mean?
Because he heard you saying,
see, what does he mean by
word? What do you mean by that there's something missing.
Danny is supported.
So you see that Germany makes it seem like it's heading for assistance.
Teddy research, this is what I mean by this.
Different scholars also had their own terminology, as I said,
Buhari was very soft in his terms, he
some discussion about him, this means is very weak,
shall be told one of the students
he used to use these terms like he's a liar
the brain itself a new term and make them
not say why I was saying his papers, or he or he has nothing to do Basically,
what this means is that Chevy or more than he needs to be saved, they need the person
So you have to
you have to be familiar with the terminology the difference.
Like for example, speeding up
the forecast like
you know, but I
mean, this one is incomplete.
As a matter of degree,
they won't use the term that someone else uses, like, no one will use
it was consistent, but you use one serving
Sometimes we use it for narratives from narrative to hate,
or being someone who's weak.
So we have studied the narrative to be someone who was never supposed
to be seen
that we have another problem in the book about terrorism.
You will often find contradictory statements about the same
Sometimes you'll find contradictory statements about the same narrator from the same scope,
books and biography about disciplinarians.
You usually sometimes you'll find statements from different scholars about that Mary
sometimes you find contradictory statements from the same scholar about that one
in the second case
the second case different segments from the same store, but
it could be two to water for weeds which some of them already mentioned.
First of all
I could have learned some new information about this area
and that gets you out to study to find what was his letter
to me, and he asked me about
some of the city and he says you must
have your license
we have to study to see what was the
second as I mentioned earlier
now we're going to the
second one is this sometimes because the way the question that
sometimes for example, someone would ask about what do you think about so and so's nice pace about
that particular mistake?
Sometimes the word question that leads to
a different essence so it seems like one day one day you must be nice
have to study to see how the questions that
are sometimes appearing apparently contradicting
similar to that
and I mentioned
this in one case you might be narrow you might be comparing the narrator to someone and in other cases comparing to someone else so that was
very nice. Yes. I would say no.
have asked me to prepare most of
statements, although they seem like
Yeah, this is like new information or
Okay, we're there.
Warrior One. One. The narrator differences been brought in from different
the opinion of the majority of the scores
put into a cookie
It just takes precedence over others.
What is the
what is the reason?
It could be
Because, for example, if you if you say to someone that's stuck up, it means according to what you've known, someone else says.
This means obviously that this person has some information that you don't know.
So therefore we take his information.
But this is not the case. There's some
there's some conditions that that goes back to the
just due to
opinion. The second test was first opinions opinion, the majority of the
scholars that say the narrator is either that there are more number than those who make the jury, then we
go before the majority
What's wrong with that?
And it goes back to the reasoning of the person.
And if these people know that this person is not acceptable,
even if there's just one or two scores to see that we know that
if they can prove that we talked about before
they can prove that procrastinating takes precedence over
the reasoning of the person.
Another opinion, which is going
to go by for the better stores in general
which one would
you like you wait,
there was no period the same way
that our quality says that you give to someone who's not that good.
We give them
Sometimes the body shows that the earliest defeat was incorrect.
So But usually, that's the case, the badness color, that's what we're talking about. We're talking about people who are better and have more information than
The one who was alive during his time or
who could study attendees and meet with his students and maybe even meet with the first
may not be the case with
getting to see his mistakes, the one who was alive in the 70s listening to him, at least for the students. He's the one I was seeing and mistakes that
to make that assumption.
the conditions for critical
Most times the contradictions are not
real or strong contradiction
is divided into three categories.
those reports are accessible without any need for further support.
seven categories those narrators may be used for supporting evidence and who may be supported by others and
categorize those narrators that are to be rejected and cannot even be used for supporting
any pretty much you can divide all categories.
I mean, all there is
if you keep these three categories in mind the general category you'll find that there's really not that much competition between what disclose the thing about
which one is competition or fiction is usually a matter of degree.
But if you talk about these three major categories, one is not saying this from the third day whereas someone else
has very rare
and usually within these categories, some are putting him at the top of the category some
some people said he was talking about
we pick out those that are rejected