Fiqh of Worship #7 -Vessels and Utensils
Channel: Hatem al-Haj
Series: Hatem al-Haj - Fiqh of Worship
File Size: 47.19MB
Bismillah Alhamdulillah wa salatu salam ala rasulillah Stan.
So today Angela, we will go over the forbidden and permissible utensils.
so basically innominate Kodama Rahim, Allah, when he addressed this issue in alarm,
he did not particularly,
just like usual, they just don't divide, because these are more tuned. So they are meant to be brief. So there are no title, subtitles and so on. So, we're trying to make
sense of the order and the structure of this particular chapter. So, you have an epidemic talked about three concepts, three main concepts in this chapter, he talks about forbidden utensils, he talks about permissible utensils, and he talks about pure and impure parts of animals, why is this related to this? And why does it have to be the chapter of utensils, because they use the animal parts to make utensils. So, he needed to tell us and then since pure you since permissible utensils are those that are pure, he needed to tell you which animal parts are pure, and which animal parts are impure. So you cannot use them in making utensils. And then when he talks about forbidden
utensils, forbidden utensils, why would they be forbidden? Because, you know, so he started by golden silver, because the natural thing, the natural, you know, conclusion would be who they will be forbidden because they're impure? Because why would something be forbidden? Why would the material, you know,
or fabric or anything be forbidden to be used for anything? Because it is like, is impure? He's telling you, there are two other reasons, in addition to this impurity business, there are two other reasons why something would not be permissible to use for making utensils, if they're gold and silver, and certainly, which is not mentioned in this book, human parts. Because like, human bones, and because they used to use everything, they used to be very, like savvy with any resources.
So he's telling you don't don't just get don't go there. Human parts are not. Because what why was it important, because he will tell you afterwards, that anything that is pure could be used as utensils. And we know that humans are pure, even if they're the, you know, human body is pure, even after this. So he's telling you, pure, except for humans, you know, so don't take human skin and use it, you know, as a water escape, or something of that nature, because that would be forbidden, not because of the impurity, but because of the sacredness of the human body. So now, this is easy. Let's just delete this out of the picture.
It's not in your book, but it is in the other hand, reading books isn't shocking. The other 100 books that are more detailed, they do mention this prohibition just alert you not that they were doing it, just to alert you don't do it at any time, just stay away from them.
And you never know, you know, the way humanity the direction humanity is taken. You never know what will be done. And what people will start to think of, you know, is like, you know, materialistic, particularly if atheism spreads, and materialism in, you know, spreads, you never know what people will try, you will never know what ideas that they may they may tell you that that's impractical to just do all this work and wash those bodies and bury them and expenses and stuff like this, Let's recycle them.
because if you think about it from an eighth, like an atheistic viewpoint in that I know that the problem with atheism is that many atheists people may be more but this is borrowed morality because atheism does not really produce any morality. This is morality borrowed from religion. This is morality.
borrowed from the herd the religiosity and the herd morality and and once that you know once the atheism spreads to the point where religion is insignificant
that morality will also be destroyed you know that there will not be heard the morality to borrow from keep this in mind
hopefully you're not we will not live to see that
okay so it mmm lipoedema Rahim Allah was the structure of the lecture and let's get to the details now. So remember nakoda Moroccan Allah said
they use this term metal and he had to have you all fit the fetal heart in whatever area
it is not lawful to use gold and silver vessels or utensils for purification or otherwise.
For example eating or you know, or storing makeup or anything.
Lima has a fan in the VSL olatuja, salaam Karla goofy Ania zombie all fed the wallet guru fees happy ham for a
long fit donia Welcome Phil O'Hara, do not drink from gold or silver vessels, and do not eat from dishes made of them, for the art for them, the unbelievers in this life and for you in the hereafter.
So a lot of trouble at akoto don't even don't drink. These are the two things that the Prophet sallallahu Sallam forbade do not use gold and silver utensils to eat portrait tray to drink in them.
Now, what about other users?
You know, because the Prophet did not say, just don't use them, period. He said, Do not use them to eat or drink. So what about other uses?
Silicon Valley said
you don't use them. And that's the majority. You don't use them for anything, eat or drink or anything?
And why is the position of the majority? Why does the position of the majority to seem to be stronger to me? Because if you think about the eila, if you think about the effective cause, the reason behind you know the legislation, which is basically the the tangible manifestation of the Heckman which is the wisdom. It is the tangible, quantifiable, measurable manifestation of the hekman which is the wisdom it's called the eila which is the effective cause that tangible, quantifiable, measurable, manifestation of the Hikmah is three parts. One using gold and silver
is a form of extravagance.
That is unbefitting of a believer.
And then someone will say, what about other precious metals, they're also extravagant about their holiday, we will come to it. It's a form of extravagance, that is unbefitting of a believer to it breaks the heart of the poor
because when the poor people see you use gold and silver utensils, and they don't have you know, they used to make gold and silver. Their currency used to be made of gold and silver, and they don't have the gold and silver currency. They're human dinar you know for their basic needs. And they see us the golden silver utensils that breaks their heart. What about other precious, you know stones and metals, the pores, the poor people usually don't recognize them.
They don't really sort of recognize the preciousness of those like if the seer stone or red stone they may not be able to figure out it takes like an expert to figure out this red stone or blue stone or this stone. What what you know how expensive that is. But usually they were able to figure out gold and silver utensils. And then the third reason why golden server utensils are forbidden
it's called to do cleanup day and it is basically causing shortage to the to precious metals that are used in currency used to make currency.
Before Nixon liberated the dollar
You know, currency was based in gold. And even if you don't have the gold and silver had the actual metals, but it was always tied to the gold reserve.
But so human beings, you know, before Nixon, you always tie their currency to the value to their, to their gold reserves. So they were tied to the country's gold reserve. So the currency that the print is tied to this gold reserve. So that is where the value of this currency comes from, the Nixon came and convinced the world that you know what, we're just going to do this temporarily, to finish our business invade. And afterwards, everything will be good and, and then ever since we've been in this mess.
So that's a very long story, by the way, I was gonna get not get into this.
there are many ramifications. So the currency that they use, they use them for currency.
These are the three reasons why gold and silver
may not be these are the three reasons why gold and silver may not be used to make utensils now, precious, other precious metals and stones and stuff like this.
you know, share this one wisdom.
But it is important that we understand that sharing one wisdom is not enough to make a perfect analogy
for sharing one ela part of the
different issue, the end, or the effective cause, sometimes could be one or multiple ones, sometimes there is how an individual one effective cause. And that makes PS pretty easy. So we've identified that intoxication is the one effective cause for the prohibition of harm.
Okay, that makes PS pretty easy. But at times, the ayatollah may not be one,
you know, the, I love the hug more, the reason behind the legislation may not be one, such as in this case, this makes the ass harder, you need to fulfill the presence of all of the parts of Allah to give, you know,
the same ruling to that which has not been of that which has been decided on to that which has not been decided on by this area.
So in this case, if you have a dish, or for your makeup, if you buy, like, for your makeup you buy like sort of a container that is more expensive than gold and silver. I would not advise you to do this, by the way, but I'm just saying that it would still be valid, because it doesn't break the hearts of the poor who was not really recognize what you're doing. And it will not cause shortage in the two methods they used for that have been used for currency.
But what about other uses using gold and silver for other than eating and drinking because the hobbyist talked about golden silver and talked about eating and drinking and we said that the golden silver you do not extrapolate from golden silver you do not include other precious metals. Why? Because the highlight of the prohibition will not be fulfilled in other precious metals and stones like it is fulfilled in gold and silver. But what about uses other than eating and drinking?
you know, extend you know, the ruling to apply to uses other than eating and drinking. Now, the amount of salary and the amount of money has
said no, no extension
just eating and drinking
majority and that certainly includes I'm very sad. Yes.
you extend that us so further Hungary's you extend that not only not only to utensils but also to tools. Gold pen, no gold
Watch no gold frames for your glasses. No gold
sometimes they may they may they're their sandals.
You know of gold part gold or all gold whatever. No. Hanbury, no, no, no, no, don't use gold for tools.
Just like you don't use ink part of made of gold. No. So it doesn't have to be on your body like in part made of gold. No. Comb made of gold. No, no, no, no. Okay? The Hambali is go as far as saying that the mere possession of those items is forbidden, because the principle is that which is impermissible to use is impermissible to own in the form of the impermissible use.
Our teeth is a different story, there is an exception because it is a form of fidelity. And in in you know,
car federa was permitted by the prophet sallallahu Sallam lament and hollyanne for when when his he had like,
sort of substitute knows, when he lost his nose and fighting and he had substitute nose of silver and gold trotting, the prophecies that have allowed him to have a gold one piece would be just like this. So, that is a form of today we, that's a form of a need, that would permit the use of gold for this purpose. But
yeah, anything that is not for the purpose of today, that it would not be permissible. The mere possession of something that is haram to use is haram to is haram, because you can't own it in the form of the impermissible use.
So basically, the you know, the mentioned in chapter one, highlighted massive musical instruments. So if this the very word is halaal tone, but if it isn't a form that is impermissible to use, then it becomes impermissible to own not just to use merely to own
So these are so this is the the issue of gold and silver utensils. Are we missing something before we move on to the next point, it's still about gold and silver utensils, but
hopefully we're not and then even haven't been Kodama said, Well, how can one more web Hema Mohamed el an takuna better see rotten mineral fit
the ruling of vessels soldered with them is the same unless it is with a small amount of silver unless it is
to solder the vessels like something breaks, you know a piece you know the handle of the vessel breaks. And they told you they told you that you really even if you could solder it with iron, but they tell you that you know it is better to solder it with silver for instance, than it would be permissible because how to use that as reports from the Prophet sallallahu Sallam that his mug broke off or the handle of his mug broke off. So he soldered it with silver. And because of this honey if it was made permissible, some of the scholars extended this to gold. That is not the correct position in the math lab. Just remember that soldering with gold is impermissible soldering with
silver is permissible if the solder is small,
and there is a need for it. And there is a need for it. What is what is the meaning of need?
entail? Need Is any purpose other than Xena.
And gooty Rahim Allah clarifies this concept in chapter monta very well. So need is any purpose other than Xena. Xena means what beautification because you have got Oriya that is necessities needs that are called needs hajia that our needs any good purpose, any purpose that vaccine Yeah, that Sinead would mean beauty beautification.
You know, we use it we
translate x and EF in different ways. So, how many translations of Tasmania Do we have
complimentary things luxuries.
I think that they have like three or four different translations for decennia is things that are not
Xena beautification. It is the Lexus versus the good to the the good to hear that that has an air conditioner gets you from eight and I'm not saying talented Hi, Alexis.
Someone's writing convinced me to buy and sell me Alexis. Yes, sir.
It's a brother who actually works here for Edison flexes. So
if you want to go, I could connect.
But the issue here is, is really the Lexus versus the Toyota. Because there is nothing that the Lexus we'll do that the to that does not do except to the beauty except that just like
anyway, so booty says yes.
women wear bracelets. Thank you very much for asking this question. It would be permissible for women to use gold for jewelry, not for utensils or tools.
When we consider the watch, you know, to be of her jewelry?
Probably yes. Because, you know, that they consider them to be
so that ruling was second lucky for asking. So women may use gold, for jewelry for beautification, not as a tool. Not so being a woman does not mean that you could use gold in part
but you could use a gold watch, you could use gold bracelets, gold whatever.
Going back, the routing of vessels solder
we got into the Lexus as you branch off into Huntington.
Let's stay focused, the ruling of vessels soldered with them gold or silver is the same unless it is with a small amount of silver solder. plating is like soldering. plating is like soldering. Unless the plating is with a very small amount of gold or silver that is not even tangible when it melts. There is more amount just like how do you figure this out the price. So if someone tells you, you know, this is a gold plated iPhone, for instance, and the iPhone it sells for $600 and this gold plated iPhone is selling for 650 that's probably not any gold that would be of any value.
So, the value will likely give you a hint whether this gold plating is really real or just like an unseen, unseen seen and tangible amount of gold.
gold or silver, gold or silver plating. If the amount is trivial and tangible. When Mel when it melts, then that is not the gold plating that is forbidden. gold plating is forbidden is thin with sort of tangible amount of gold or silver. They used to do gold plating of ceilings and in any amount of time era himolla particularly commented on this, that this you know Bill Allah, you know would be
more deserving of the prohibition. You know, gold plating of ceilings would be more deserving of the prohibition.
gold or silver.
Like can men have silver
men can have silver jewelry. They just can't have gold or silver utensils or tools. Women can have gold and silver jewelry. They just can't have gold or silver utensils or tools is the amount limited
Like any have any amount for symbol
men can have any amount of silver here Yes. It's like something that's supposed to look like silver and gold are supposed to look like silver or gold is not silver or gold. So gold them is not really gold
for a small amount
No, we're not talking about this small amount that you still need the hairdryer still need the need for a small amount of silver. But this small amount is not trivial. The gold plating that is permissible and who is when it is trivial and tangible when you melt it and it and there is nothing that is there nothing tangible. Yeah, so that is not YesI that is very yes khaleel Did you have fun
but if you solder that your mug was silver, there will be a tangible amount of silver you know really tangible.
Then email Kodama Rahim Allah set. So now we're done with golden silver. Any questions about golden silver that are very pertinent. A clarification, not an extension? Yes.
embroidery for women.
That will be helpful because that is foreseen for women and
that actually would not be
based on this humble review where we're just talking about the humble review based on the humble review it would not be permissible.
artwork that is made out of silver
that would still not be permissible.
You know, because it
you know, it is just like the gold or silver plating up ceilings.
Yes. For the watch. component that's
like part of the movement is gold plated.
That'd be okay or
hip it melts and then it gives you nothing.
Then it is nothing.
And if if you have a gold plated arm in your watch likely when this melts, if it is gold plated arm in your watch likely when this melts, it's nothing can really be nothing. There has been nothing tangible no goal to sell. Yes.
Okay the shaft review allowed uses for other venues pencils, Shafi on vi reviews. Allowed uses of golden silver for other than utensils, that's why I'm telling you I'm just answering you with a better view. So the allowed uses of golden silver in other than utensils because they feel that you know are for instance that is made of gold and silver is okay to the
a pen that's made of gold and silver is okay for them a base in a container is okay for them.
It is not for eating and drinking. So they allow those uses. The mother is controversial. As I explained, yes.
Happy and majority are liking the combat Yes.
In this case,
controversial silver is permissible for men to wear rings by agreement, bracelets and silver and necklaces that is controversial.
permissible vessels and those of the people of the boat Where do
Stan Mancera for harati Plaza, where Jews is still a mad sell any Hara, what
was the amount of awani Al Kitab. Once he became Madame Naja to her, it's permissible to use all other pure vessels and possess them and to use the vessels of the People of the Book
and their clothes, unless they are known to be NP or unless they are known to be impure.
And here, we'll talk about
So, why did he, so, everything that is pure is held on to us as utensils, but he told you that the gold and silver are not and he told you human body is not then the rest is halon. And then he will talk to you about what is what is pure and impure in terms of animal parts, just to tell you what you could use and what you cannot use. But before he moves on, he just wanted to tell you that pure pure that I'm talking about includes the utensils of the people.
Half the book,
which means what that the utensils of the people of the notebook are not allowed to use No. In the Hanbury mouth have utensils of all people are allowed to use all people, regardless of their religion. So Zoroastrians, as booty elaborates in charge, harmonica, even people that use not just that even people that say who's the slaughtering is invalid, their utensils are handed to us. So, all people
having said that,
the utensils of non Muslims, non Muslims are three different types, those that you're certain are pure certain
and certain of em purity
And I try and always to break things down in your mind and try to have a scheme sort of to be able to have a grasp of the
So, when you think about things, think of the Think of the two extremes, where the scholars will likely agree and then come here for a walk or move inwards to the middle, where the disagreement will take place. So that you could have a clear bird's eye view of the issue. So, if we are certain of the purity and that includes new utensils, then by agreement, you could use those utensils, if you are certain of the impurity, then by agreement, you cannot use those utensils. If you're uncertain of the purity versus impurity, then they disagree.
They will disagree and when they disagree, they disagree into just various
positions. One position is
the hanbali view.
Is he we can be very easy sometimes.
The hand daddies will say Don't worry about it, don't investigate it presume the purity Don't worry about it, don't investigate it presume the purity and the ham bellies are kind enough to tell you that this applies not only to the people of the book, but to all humanity who just presumed the purity.
we have the Hanafi and Shafi views and by the way, there is like a small s here with the hand bellies on this issue.
We have the Hanafi undershelf A views and a small a with them. Which will say this like
macro not hard on this like macro. And then we will have the mannequin view
here that when say
Yeah although you may expect Americans to be easy with in this area purification general but that's their position
but then certain a purity all said find certain of impurity old said not fine uncertain that's the breakdown
this is a matter that I discussed
yesterday I was talking about this
the concept of a moment valuer
in or a moment value means what?
IMO means generality it's like widespread the wide when when the affliction is widespread when the test is widespread when the hardship is widespread widespread hardship.
Okay, widespread hardship the concept of invalid Bedwell widespread hardship
Okay, the concept of a normal balewa widespread hardship
wouldn't make it
in my belief would make it
okay for people that have been following kind of your chapter your medic effect to follow the Hanbury in this particular matter
that is not picking and choosing
because you will follow whatever you have been following until something comes up whether it is our movement better or a hardship an individual hardship or you come to learn something you know else and then then
you will resort to verification, weighing of the two positions. And if you believe one of the two positions is closer to the intent of Allah and His Messenger, that is what you will go by
if you are unable to determine which position is stronger than it is okay for you to take the easier position because that is when we can say, let me know if you have
any left Tara is Sara Homer melomakarona Smith, the prophet was not given never given the choice between two matters, except that he chose the easier one unless it was sinful,
it would have been sinful, had you been comfortable that the position that you have taken is not what Allah wanted. But if you do not know then it is not sinful to take the easier position.
Now, we are not going to be shopping for easy positions you will be following whatever you have been the taught whatever you have learned you have you will be following that until some hardship befalls you and you go and ask him the move to disagree until you know you attend the class and you come to learn that there is another position that is also equally valid.
That would permit whatever you thought to be impermissible or that is easier. That is when you may have after going through the process and the process is to use your knowledge of the Quran and the Sunnah and consult to your heart's stuff, the palabok. You know, you ask the people of knowledge, use your knowledge of grants and that way between the different positions, you consulted your heart. You are it's completely a dead end, then you may you may use the easier one. So why did the Hanbury say it's all fine? Where did they come up with this? Because the prophet SAW Salah eight of the food of the Christians and Jews had never asked them never investigated. What did you cook in this before
you cook this? Or did you clean it? Did you wash it? We never know that the prophet SAW them whenever he was invited by a Jew or you know anyone that he particularly
investigated them other Jews can sometimes have wine, different types of wine.
The other thing is that, you know is Sahaba used to do the same thing. And it was reported
in Buhari that the Sahaba drank from the walrus can have a mistake a woman and we they used to live among the non Muslims have they been particularly particular about the
issues we would have had tons of reports about the Sahaba investigating particularly when they went to Iran and the mixed with Israel Austrians and, you know, we have tons of reports about the Sahaba been uncomfortable with the saddles in prison because they come from their, you know, the skin of their animals and then they just did not make a big deal of a lot of those issues. So they were easy about it. And then we could also say, you know, but why did the Why did the honeybees and cefa is sad and disliked and the Maliki said macro Han and also read some reports within the embedded method of the two positions the disliked and the hotter
because the prophets of Salaam was asked about by Abu Salah, but Hussein he said to the prophet SAW Selim in every article management and dedicated we live in a land of the people have the book, the you know,
kudos to him Should we eat in their vessels and utensils, and the prophet SAW Salim said, lair Illa and lethargy to Hydra tecido boot then minha fancy Lou has a Makoto v hannu. Unless you don't find other utensils, then wash them and eat in them. Then wash them and eat in them. So the Hanafi is and chef is in the medic, he said before washing and these are their positions before washing after washing. Everybody says it says it's okay it's fine. But they're saying hi my crew and you know before washing, they said that you need to wash them.
So the handpiece jfets and medic he said well here The Prophet said don't unless you wash them and then eaten them. So the hand of using chef is failed that this had these this command to wash is for is a bap preference recommendation not obligation. So that is why they said it is macro.
The Han Maliki said no The Prophet said don't unless you wash them, then wash them and eat in the La la la la la que hacer microfi have no unless you don't find the other utensils, then wash them and eating them. So this particular Abu Salah Hussain al Hadith is
is a strong proof for the Maliki position because that's the sort of the obvious indication or implication of the Hadees. However,
that Hannah is and Jaffa is said that this was a recommendation and Hanbury said that the companies have a different take on this hubby's the hamburger he said in some of the reports of this hadith the Prophet also mentioned Zoroastrians the Abu Salah also mentioned modules and some reports of the Hadith and a Buddha would in particular, Abu Salah was said what if you could do remote Cinzia, why Ashura buena Fianna to him at home and they, you know cook pork in their produce in their parts and drink wine in their vessels.
So the Hanbury said that because of this thinking of Abu Salah, the Prophet is saying, if this is what you know that this character this particular part was used to cook
pork, then you must wash it and the hamburgers will certainly agree with this, if you are certain it was impure, then you must wash it. But the honeyberries say since the Prophet did not investigate or question the people who gave him food, they must have given him food utensils in vessels is something to hold the food since he did not investigate and we don't know that he investigated then his lack of investigation will say you don't need to investigate and you presume purity and his statement or busaba must then mean in the case of certainty that the vessels or the parts were used for him for cooking your
food or drink then you need to investigate and wash before use it.
Is that clear? Because this is an issue that you guys come across pretty often.
And then in all honesty, your your you presumed that things have been washed, you know, in restaurants that you presume that things have been washed, yes, cooking surface. So for example, you go to a restaurant today
Sort of like pork and other foods that you can eat and they cook you pretty much know that they cook everything on the same grill and they don't want if you are certain if you saw the pork being removed and the chicken being put on the surface, then you should not eat.
Yes. Okay, I was just following up on how far person should presume or
you walk into a pizzeria is a slicer right there and then to find
one of those like Subway sandwiches The night is right. All the meats sitting there you should ask them to watch tonight
I don't think that you're required to ask them unless you're certain that I because he says hard to be certain that the knife was used
and usually people wipe knives and the unauthorized position in the 100 emails upon authorized position and the humbling method is that wiping knife knives knives is sufficient you don't need to wash them
people wipe knives all the bank
where they don't they don't
they can they don't wipe it. They don't like
tell them okay, without lying don't tell them you're allergic to pork because saying you're allergic to pork is lying.
So don't lie.
Tell them I have pork in tolerance.
Anyway in tolerances you know it could be it could be a lot of things
anyway, let's let's just move Welcome back to the questions unless the you know,
wanting pure and impure parts of dead animals the amen panda Moroccan Allah said was awful Mighty oshawott I have the wool and here of dead animals as pure
more than here are dead animals is pure. Which Wallen here
half dead animals, which that animals in the Hanbury madhhab
Okay, so SUV is the wall.
Whoa, plus hair loss ferebee take the same ruling warm hair feather.
They take the same ruling of which animals that is different from the skin we did not get to the skin yet. Wool hair feathers in the hands of any method in the correct position is only for the animals that were pure when they were alive.
Livestock animals that you could eat are all pure when they are alive.
Anything that's smaller than a cap the size of a cat or smaller is pure wildlife. When they dye their hair, wool and feather is pure. That's Hanbury okay.
Maliki all pure everybody is pure all animals all feather. Yeah, they just like
they don't mind and pigs, anything dogs everything.
So we'll you know so the hair of pigs and dogs for the medic is would be pure.
So since you guys get a come across this often
because sometimes they use them to make brushes and things of that nature.
The hafeez shafa is an honeyberries considered pig's hair to be impure, who considers pigs the hair to be pure.
that so that would be the only one to consider pig's ear to be pure.
But then certainly,
wanders away from the message and takes the positions of some other
of the forum amps. So even though mera mala took possession of Imam Malik here,
but the majority which is Hanafi Shafi hand combat he said that
pig's hair is impure, but they still allow this use.
They still allow the tissues because they felt that people need to use pig's hair for various reasons that pig's hair somehow proved to be better than other types.
And people were using it. So they allow the twos a moment better was everybody's using and they felt that the impurity is not that bad to prohibited. But the Hanbury said you could use it in dry uses only
dry uses not wet.
So if you have wet hair, don't brush your hair with pig's hair brush, you just brush your dry hair if you have to. And if you have this you know if you're not particular about your hair brushes,
but in general
and venema medic would not have a problem to begin with because pigs hair is pure.
Next point is what coolutils the matin who I will unmute back for one is Waka vatika is the skin of any dead animal whether it has been tanned or not, is impure.
So, the skin of any dead animal whether it has been attained or not, is impure and so are their bones. So skin of the denims
and this hero pig skin also something that you may come across often. So scan of dead animals.
What do we mean by dead animals by the way?
other non slaughter non slaughter animals are that what have you slaughter a dog
Because there is no as a cat, there is no
sort of sanctifying slaughtering for a dog.
And the same applies to a lion, a wolf, all of that. So livestock animals logically you slaughter them. You don't call them dead afterwards. Don't call them Mater. This is a slaughter cow. Not mated slaughtered Muslim music care. So it is a slaughtered cow. Slaughter cheap goat not make when you say Mater although it is it is major in the sense that it died also, you know, but you don't call it Mater Mater is any animal that is not edible when it dies. And any animal that is edible, if it dies by other than proper slaughtery they will be called Mater. So the skin of
the skin of
The easiest position here is hanafy shafa is an
za via Harry's they will tell you any skin is pure after tanning
mate and not make any skin after tanning is pure. And you can use it. The Hanafi is will say except for pigs.
They will say no to pigs.
The shepherds will say except for pigs and dogs who remember the trophies with dogs they're just like the ham baddies in terms of being very like intolerant of dogs.
Pigs and dogs know the varieties will say absolutely everything is okay.
You know so when you pick skin that kitten because for the virus to them, you know so they take this hubby's a human who happen to be a toddler, whenever he is hired gets there and that becomes pure and they take it to heart. And they then say whenever any time that gets and will be computed and the rest of the sky
What to use ratiocination reasoning and so on and say, you know, but pigs the high this particularly the you know and stuff like that.
And then who also signed it was a virus Mohamed Abdel Hakim who was a medic he then Shafi then back to Maliki. And Abu Yusuf Rahim Allah disciple of Abu hanifa decided with providers in this regard
in agreement to
nomadic is not very it is not very easy here. Yeah. So now the Hanbury position that they don't believe that tanning will purify the heights of that animates the Hanbury position will believe that it will purify the hides of animals that were pure, then and go purify the hides of the animals that were pure when they were alive. Not all dead animals, animals that were pure when they were alive. The hides of cats will be
no I'm sorry.
They hung berries do not say it would purify. Ham berries will say tanning would permit the use even though they still believe it's impure.
So the honeyberries would say that when for maita for dead animals, their hide is impure. tanning, when not purified, therein will permit the use of the word pothead when they were alive, like cats and smaller animals and livestock, cows, sheep and so on.
Because for the home batteries, they have these two different hobbies about
that animals one hobbies favorite
hobbies, hobbies 11 Okay.
When the Prophet sallallahu Sallam wrote to them a lot our favorite computer we have a philosopher Amina hubby had been when I asked him, I have permitted for you Mater before but once this book reaches you do not make use of their iPads, or
the attendance or any part of the dead animals. And then in the other Hadith, the prophet SAW someone saw them dragging a dead goat and he said, Allah has happened to me, why have you not taken the skin and made use of it when they told him it's a dead goat? to reconcile these two Aha, this takes a lot of work from the scholars and that is why they disagree over tanning, whether it will purify the hides of that animals or not purify the highs of the animals. The discussion is a very lengthy discussion. And some of the scholars you know claim abrogation of one of the two ladies and some of these colors, the authenticate daddies of the keytab where the Hadith of the prophets will
send a message where he said don't use any part of the dead animals. And some of the scholars will try to reconcile and say that it is called the hab as long as it has not been tanned. Once it is then it is not Ehab anymore.
it's a it's a very lengthy discussion, the positions are pretty
comparable in terms of strength.
Then the next point is the bones the bones also of dead animals. Now we will go back to in mathematic been easier here. So the bones of dead animals
the bones of the animals are impure.
bones of the animals. No, I'm sorry.
America is not that
shouldn't be like this.
The bones of the animals are impure according to the mathema Dyneema medical terms of the bones of that animals are pure, according to the Imam Abu hanifa. And
every time he or him Allah hypnotized me is the latter sort of
is the sort of the late amount of the latter Hanbury generation such as like anomaly in the Shafi mother, so anytime a family mother would be like now in the traffic
Meza but he had his own choices sometimes outside of the authorized position of the mouth hub. So he sometimes would say it may go Maliki sometimes he'd go hanafy and so on, they would still mention his position in the Hanbury meth habit would be a word in the Mazda.
this would be so remember hanifa said bones are fine of the animals, what would be so what would be the proof of remember honey for here, ivory, the fact that the righteous predecessors used the ivory without hesitation, made them say that ivory are the tusks of elephants, these are the upper canines of elephants and teeth and bones take the same ruling. Therefore, if they did not have a problem with teeth of elephants, they should not have a problem with bones of elephants also after the die, and elephants cannot be
slaughtered. So bones of the animals are
comparable to their position on bones of dead animals is their position on enzymes. It's the same division. So the amount of hanifa would say enzymes are fine.
The rest of them will say not fine. But there is a combative point. And even me also cited what was in here and said enzymes are fine.
And it's a long discussion. You know, it's a long discussion. But
the proof of imamo hanifa that enzymes are fine is that the Sahaba went to Persia and the eight from the cheese of the Zoroastrians the proof of the rest of them that enzymes are not fine are reports that when the Sahaba when the Persia The eighth from the cheese, they thought to be made by the Christians.
And then when you have reports of different you know,
of this nature, then
the two arguments would have strengths,
the two arguments will have strengths and then there is great ratiocination reasoning. So remember honey if I would say that enzymes are fluids fluid is not flesh, flesh does not fluid does not die, when the flesh dies. And even if they are inside the vessel, the container the organ that has become impure, they don't become impure per se, by being inside the organ that has become impure.
The what you could add to the argument of the amount of hanifa here that enzymes are okay, is the concept of the cdr fan who are trivial things are exempt.
The concept of video see if you are fine, who or
I will lose two minutes I'll take the two minutes from you after
the concept. Okay, so what what could be added to that support the position to be Namo hanifa is a series of fun who trivial things are exempt enzymes when they are used for the you know, to make the cheese
to make the milk curdling to make cheese out of milk. They're used in very, very tiny amounts. So the car fan who can be invoked in this argument, that concept that principle can be invoked in this argument? What could be used for us in America, for our Muslim community is a moment valuer which is the widespread hardship, you know, to tell your kids you have to investigate the origin of all enzymes in all foods, the returns not the return the return seems to be the big thing. Now. For some reason, everybody's asking about the readers in particular.
To investigate the origin of all enzymes and all foods may be hard. We have to respect all of the positions because all of these positions are legitimate positions. He had the position of Amanda hanifa here is the position of
A valid metalhead, a man who has valid reports and valid reasoning. Therefore, that is a position that could very easily be used in the case of armament bandwidth, or widespread hardship. It's not worthy that Abu Yusuf and Mohammed Al Hassan
did not agree with even more hanifa particularly with liquid enzymes. They didn't agree with him on Eva and decided with the three other Imams and that is noble and commendable. And however, the earlier kamberi hanafy position is the permissibility is the position of the Imam, not the two disciples. It is not uncommon for the latter Hanafi scholars to side with, you know when and when they have a disagreement with in the Hanafi madhhab like here between the amendment the two disciples, the side with the position that is adopted by the three other imams medica Shafi and Mr. Mohammed, commendable, beautiful, commendable. However, in this particular regard, when you have
this movie, by the way, widespread hardship, it is more commendable to
you know, to bring about ease and constraints weren't accommodations, if Arbuckle amaura Tessa constraints weren't accommodations
quickly I will read this and then you will go home and read it in the book because there is not much discussion about it. We'll put a roommate in Nagisa. lol Adam a while haiwan Matt la Vila issue Ella fee, Nicola rasulillah, Salam filbur Waterloo whoo man. Oh, hello Mater to yml nF sallahu. wa ala is our lahmacun Mota one Laden, meaning
every dead body is filthy, except that of a human being. And a sea creature that does not live except in the sea. Due to the statement of the Messenger of Allah sallallahu Sallam regarding the sea. Its water is pure. And it's that animals are permissible to eat. And that which does not have blood, if it did not emanate from impurities, so little worms will be not notice if they die. Like worms that come You know, in the cheese, they will allow you to eat those worms with the cheese
or whatever, whatever. But except for worms that emanate from NASA, like worms that emanate from feces and dead bodies. You don't want to eat those