Fiqh of Foods and Drinks #3 – Proper Slaughtering

Los Alamos it allowed us

to proceed. Today inshallah we will have three chapters. The first one would be Bob was the zecca, which is the chapter on proper slaughtering, the second would be Kitab aside, which is the book of hunting and the third would be Babel motor, which is the chapter on the content.

And in short life, we finished the three chapters today, we will have finished the entire section on foods and drinks.

And the sort of the outline of today's class when we talk about BBs, aka Kodama, we'll talk about what needs to be slaughtered. And then he will talk about the types of

that scale, which are not limited to slaughtering you, but you have three different types of the scare,

stabbing, slaughtering and fated wounding. And we will come to discuss the sort of the different types and when each one applies, stabbing, slaughtering, slaughtering and fatally wounded and then he will talk about the conditions of slaughter slaughtering, and the other conditions as well, when he talks about Kitab aside that is like a subsection of babyz zakka, but he made it Akita by itself, for some reason, it is small, it basically he will cover in the Kitab aside the rest of the conditions that are applicable, you know, there are conditions that are applicable to slaughtering and hunting, and there are conditions that are only for hunting. So, he will basically say that we

have covered the three conditions that are applicable to both, and we will cover it now, the three conditions that are only applicable to hunting, and then when he will talk about Babel. Babel, Matata is like, like an addendum to, to the other chapters, he will talk about someone who's compelled, I mean, he was not able to have any music, or an animal that has been properly slaughtered or some like food to eat, starving, etc. And the rulings of that compelled and he will sort of piggyback to this the rulings of that we or medical treatment, it's like a footnote, they didn't get much attention to to this

often because we end their times was pretty conjectural. So, it was like a like a footnote to eating and drinking it is not like a section by itself, which it now deserves to be for sure. So, you will find that my commentary here is a little bit more detailed, because really, he he has just like two phrases small to medium phrases to make about

your sentences to to make about today. Anyway,

we will start with BBs aka

insha Allah, which I translated as proper slaughtering, you know, translation is usually difficult because every language has its own logic Zakah means to complete, to exactly means to complete. That's it. So, to complete here the acquired meanings of that guy is that you are completing the

basically the termination or expiration of the animal in a cage, except what you have found, you know, in sort of, metallic made to

electron mated to a

metallic on Mater

moto Dr. Tanaka, Tanaka sobre la Mazda k two. So in Lamaze Academy accepted that what you have

completed, meaning you found that

almost dead not you know, not almost dead in the sense that it was only

it did not have an established life, which is hermosa para which we'll come to talk about, but it was still alive but it is about to die.

So, if you catch it in this phase

And then you the katoen you complete the sort of

the process by proper slaughtering because then it will be permissible for you in lamb as a caterer except that once you have completed so then the cat became sort of indicative of proper

not only proper slaughtering, but highlighting the animal and it was that's what it is making the animal halaal to eat. That's what the car means, because it Zakah would mean proper slaughtering, proper wounding fated wounding, which is a lot because, you know, if you're unable to catch the animal, and you just wounded somewhere, anywhere, that is considered the mosaica halaal to eat to eat hunting, moussaka. halaal to eat type to eat. So Bob is a cat would mean what would mean and this is a cow with with a Val not as I like Zika Zika hero, those sort of the third pillar of Islam is well that's a so be like this

the the guy that we are talking about is with them like this. So, this is the slaughtering whatever hydrolyzing the animal making the animal has

to eat.

But for lack of a good translation, I guess.

I mean, if you translate this linguistically it will make no sense.

So I just called the proper slaughtering.

But if someone has like a better translation than you, you let me know

Zika and scare scare is the act of making it with Africa. As Kenya as your, your tournament eating of

you're terminating of the life of the animal.

You're terminating of the life of the animal.

So any amount of damage to him Allah who died in the year 620 after the hedger in his book on the tobacco which is the primary many what somebody said under the chapter of the guy or chapter on proper slaughtering yerba Coloma Phil Bahari is a cat in the public Rasulullah sallallahu sallam.

Now, what Hello method,

elimination feel better, even hotter, in less Sanatana.

So all the animals are permissible to consume without proper slaughtering, or the cat because the Messenger of Allah sallallahu Sallam said concerning the sea, it's that is permissible. excluded from this are the amphibians that also live on land. They are not permissible until properly slaughtered, except for crabs and the like, except for crabs and the like, because how could you slaughter crabs?

So

what could be slaughtered? What are the crmls so he's basically saying

that slaughtering does not apply to

sea elements. It only applies to land animals, not to sea animals, sea animals, you do not need to slaughter and you know, but but in Muslim countries when they export, like when they import, like fish or something, they still say it was Bahasa and Islamic or Sharia or Islamic or something is you know slaughtered according to Sharia.

This is just like, basically to comfort to the people or appease them. You don't need to slaughter fish, no one slaughter is fish.

But at any rate, the sea animals you do not need to slaughter and the Hanbury must have there are certain sea animals that you slaughter because remember Achmed said he I would like to see them slaughtered, particularly the turtle he was equivocal about it, but he said I'd love to see the turtle slaughtered, that's the sea turtle sea turtle slaughtered. He said the same about the sea lions. Like you don't eat a sea lion without slaughtering it. Yes, we can eat sea lions, because it still is a sea animal. Even though it lives on land, but it is a sea animal so amphibians that look like they could be slaughtered.

They should be slaughtered. amphibians that look like they could be slaughtered, they should be slaughtered. We did say before that somebody must have crocodiles or alligators are not allowed to eat. So these are amphibians that are not allowed to eat, why they are not allowed to eat because they are predatory. And they,

they they are amphibians. So, like if they are really sea animals to sea animals, we don't care if they're predatory, right, because there are a lot of predatory fish like sharks and stuff like that. So we don't care if they are predatory, if they're purely sea animals, but because they are amphibians, and they are predatory. And they have like teeth, canine teeth, and they are most of us.

Sorry that repulsive to eat. The combination of the above made them in the heavy metal although it's it's a controversial issue. You'll always find these issues to be controversial, because you don't have something traceable to the Prophet sallallahu sallam, or can be extracted from that which is explicit from the Prophet sallallahu sallam. But not all amphibians are in the Hanbury Mesaba, I'm just trying to say this, alligators are not valid, but other amphibians are, such as sea lions and turtle citizens

because they look like they could be slaughtered, then they should be slaughtered. In the Hanbury method they should be slaughtered. Otherwise, see animals do not need to be slaughtered.

Hope to Hormel Hello Mater to the Prophet sallallahu Sallam said about its water is pure, its water is pure and that is permissible. So

you know if you find that fish, that's fine, you can eat it

even if he did not hunt it, that's what I mean. Even if you did not fish you know if you did not catch it, I'm sorry.

So then

we're done with that part. Of course, you know, there are amphibians that would not be slaughtered like crabs and no one can swallow crabs. And then the sheikh said, well I own Middlebury beaver is a captain in La gerada was a bow or worship.

None of the land animals is permissible without proper slaughter except for locusts and their likes. Now none of the

land animals is permissible without proper slaughter except for locusts and their likes. locusts are highlighted and mad and upset who say that which has no blood bloodless animals,

would would would be helpful

to eat now, unless they are most activist or right unless they are repulsive and disgusting. However, we cannot say locusts are most activists. Why? Because if needed nlb Alpha said in a report in Bukhari and Muslim that we have gone on several expeditions with the Messenger of Allah sallallahu Sallam when we were only eating locusts. We were only eating locusts and the Prophet sallallahu Sallam said hello Automator to any other man, a man made attorney

who to Eldorado I met the many for the capital to hire to to the animals were made permissible to us. And

two types of blood

or blood filled organs, maybe you could say are permissible for us. The two animals that are permissible for us are the two dead animals are permissible for us our fish and locusts and to blood the organs or blood filled organs that are permissible for us our

liver and spleen, liver and spleen. So, then you cannot say locusts are repulsive because you have something explicit from the Prophet sallallahu Sallam that they use the eated and Sahaba used to eat Lucas all the time. And also on October the Alon, who decreed that those who kill a locust in

in a harem

need to donate Tamra or date for every locust they get.

Now a you know sometimes it is it is unfortunate that like, when I was much younger, I heard that our honorable CFO was a child and I heard an honorable, a very honorable Chief, in fact,

talk about and this sort of hostile language that we basically have for others for non Muslims is really unwarranted and unacceptable, or it's really unacceptable unless we were in

Find our language will continue to be

sort of in conflict with the whole world.

So it's not about you know, people from the Netherlands and how disgusting they are the eat locusts or you know, said econetic Gerrard

at the time, I was a child, you know, you know there and I kept on, you know, academic job

then I come across this, what?

So, that is, you know, it's, it's just like, you know, you don't need that toxic language, because sometimes also it it makes you and I'm quite sure that she knew that this was a very like, this was like a tier one safe. You know, it's not like a hottie even a mustard.

So I'm quite sure that he knew that the prophets of Salaam used to eat locusts or the Sahaba. And it's permissible explicitly is the Hadith and there is no way that the chef did not know it, but I didn't know how he reconciled inside him. Basically to shame the people before eating locusts when we ate locusts either need locals but you know,

you know, the most honorable honorable generation eight locals.

Okay, so

avoid the toxic language.

Then the sheiks that

was the captain Cassie masataka Nadine was up in LA was the hub when I heard a bit

faint, faint in her

heart, my own heart is types of the cat. There are three types of proper slaughter now, which is stabbing at the base of the neck, not how to which is stabbing at the base of the neck, have you ever seen a camel being

slaughtered?

This is how they do it. So the Capitol would be standing and they would tie one of the feet of the candles. And they would be they would be standing and they will stab it at the juggler notch. It's called suprasternal or juggler notch, this one here, see at the base of the neck, you know that that junction between the neck and the chest, don't stab it here that is called not harder.

Versus that just to do this, you know, to the animal to lay the animal and to do this

not her, not her

as he will say here. So he said

the proper slaughter not stabbing at the base of the neck that slaughter by cutting and the heart, which is fated wounding that has the usual thing that you're used to like goats and stuff like this.

And fate and wounding if you're unable to catch the animal or if you are unable to control the animal, then you fatally wounded the animal and that would make the animal hello to eat.

It is recommended to slaughter Gammons by stabbing and it is recommended to slaughter all other animals by cutting if one stabs what is preferable to cut or cuts what is preferable to stab it is still permissible. So camels preferable to to stab them not harder.

Rest the rest of the animals it's preferable to slaughter them that

if you switch it is fine. If you switch it is fine as long as you meet the other conditions that we will come to address shortly inshallah. But if you switch it is fine. Why because they used to, you know, and and there are some animals that are basically in between not and that are equally okay for them, such as

horses, you know, it's not enough for us and so Southern fried Medina.

We have

slaughtered by stabbing a horse during the time of the Prophet sallallahu Sallam in Medina.

And now Harold Bakker also known as Bukhara

the Prophet sallallahu Sallam slaughtered by stabbing a cow.

That was you know, it is not really known that the prophets of Southern pepper ate beef. But his wives did. You know and

so, but But at any rate, cows and horses like big animals are close to this

of camels. You could slaughter them by stabbing at the base of the neck in the juggler notch this one

now,

switching would be okay as long as the other conditions are

met.

Then the SEC said we'll start with the security code he has a lot to show route

layer two, layer two, key for any akuna

a Muslim and Okita Bian.

fluellen Majnoon was Sakura, and well careful and let the laser cutter be fella to Hello, that we had two

conditions for the validity of the

there are three conditions for the validity of proper slaughter, first the eligibility of the slaughter, which means that he must be sane, capable of slaughtering and Muslim or of the People of the Book. As for a child and insane person, one who's drunk or an unbeliever, other than the people of the book, they're the Bihar or slaughter the animal is not permissible to consume is not permissible to consume. We're talking about the Bihar not the animal that not the food that the cook, you could have. You could like atheist, Zoroastrians, Hindus, Buddhists, you can eat food cooked by anyone, what matters is that they are the slaughtering who's doing this lottery, not who's

serving the food, not who is inviting you to dinner.

It is who's doing the slaughtering, the person who's doing the slaughtering has to be Muslim marketer.

And certainly,

you know, it's a controversial issue, however, the majority would say, and that is the only position that makes sense to me, unfortunately, sometimes I have to be a little radical,

that that the kitabi you know, being a kitabi does not basically

rule out the need for the other conditions to be met. You know, being a kitabi does not meet mean the mater of the kitabi or the dead animals of the kitabi or Montana cottage gotta be the animal that Nikita be suffocated or the whatever would be highlighted for us that doesn't make any sense, you know, unless we are saying that they have a special blessing that Muslims don't have

we are eating their food, because we are saying that their food is tight, it is wholesome, because the follow area that or originated from the divine that or that came down from the divine. Therefore, therefore, this wholesome That is why we can marry the women are the people of the book, because they have commonalities, they have the sort of a common ground, we have a common ground with them, they believe in a Sharia that had come down or originated from the divine. So the common grid, there is enough common ground and certainly the the discussion, go back to the chapter on marrying from the people of the book and you will hear all of the sort of my the discussion there and my

position

in marrying in Muslim lands, non Muslim lands and so on and so forth. But the exception of marrying from the People of the Book versus the rest of the

non believers and eating from their food is because they follow a Sharia that has come down. If they don't follow that Sharia then we don't eat their food. If they are not meeting the conditions if they are not slaughtering then we do not eat their food if they are electrocuting collabing suffocating drowning the animals when we don't eat because we ate their food since they follow their journey if they don't follow their Sharia we don't eat their food. So that's the point about the kita V and yes it is prescribed under Sharia slaughter.

So if you are if you can guarantee that there is the people who live nowadays as I said so many times because that's also something that color you know, in this discussion usually people bring this up that these are not keytab you know the architect bees have they are considered Christians or Jews. By the

fellow Christians and Jews, they are Christians and Jews, they are bees, it is not you who determines

the the archetype we are not. And if you think that during the time of the Prophet sallallahu Sallam they did not, you know, make sure to give a you know, or as cry partners to God or say that Jesus is the Son of God, you've never heard the Koran or you've never read the prayer. So during the time of the prophet will suddenly have the same beliefs about Jesus peace be upon him, they were still called Kitab bees, it was still permissible to eat their food, it was still permissible to marry

their women. So it's

the this is not a relevant discussion, what is relevant here is do they fulfill the other conditions are the other conditions met or not? If the other conditions are met, just the fact that this is the food advocate, it does not make it harder, because it is just the food. Because the food of a Muslim has not had an antenna, the other conditions are met. So we are given them the status of a Muslim when it comes to slaughtering, not a higher status, not we're not ascribing to them, you know, especially the blessings that Muslims don't have that would make their mate bless it and wholesome.

So anyway,

he needs to be Muslim, or gotta be, or she, he or she should be Muslim market.

And to be saying, because imagine Allah, Allah, who keep in mind all of these details about the rulings and all of these conditions, and all of these restrictions are because you're doing something here, you're taking a life, aren't you? You know, if you have seen, you know, people, some some do when you were younger, you sympathize with the goats. And if you have seen this stuff, you know, and the chickens and everybody who's been slaughtered, you are actually taking a life. So you are saying, we are saying that there are conditions, there are restrictions, because this is a serious business, we are taking a life. So we're trying to say that, Oh, God, you've permitted us to

take this life for our own benefit for our own health. Keep in mind, essential amino acids are that are needed for you know, by human beings are extremely hard to find in non animal food, or vegetarian foods. Therefore, it is completely, you know, it is completely, it's completely wholesome, to eat, animal to eat, you know, we're veca animals. But we're still saying to Allah, this, this is serious, we're taking a lie. Well, based on your permission, all of the rituals associated with this is an acknowledgement of the seriousness of this business, we are taking a life, in fact, you have permitted us to do this for our own benefit for our own health, and so on.

But we are sort of going through all the rituals and all the sort of complicated process to acknowledge this, if it is, if you take it casually and lightly and you just like be eating animals left and right and getting them in whichever way you want. That is certainly not conducive to that sort of respect of life, even if it is animal life.

So the person needs to be a pastor, he has to have that pastor or that need to be slaughtering to be making that exception. And, you know, based on the name of Allah subhanaw taala. That's why you have to send me to say Bismillah, so that you make that exception and slaughter this animal or give this animal so without passed without errata. Well, intention, if you are intoxicated, if you are insane, you don't have costs, and this is like like the other a bet that you have to have passed. So if you're out of your mind by some sort of internal or external factor, insane or john given your the Bihar is not allowed to eat.

June 2 well capitalized so because of that we had to ask for the child in Monza reported the consensus. And that is certainly the position in the Hanbury method that the serving tribes of Bihar is harder to eat. So the child that is

being

referenced here is not the sort of discerning child we're talking about the

the

The non discerning child a non discerning child's the Bihar is not allowed to eat Why? Because that there is no past you know there is no errata here

is like the sacrum and the metronome like the drunk and the insane but once the child becomes discerning then the beehive is halal to eat.

Okay

then the chef said so that is the first condition. The first condition is Aliya Tomodachi, or the eligibility of the

person doing the slaughtering the eligibility of the person doing the slaughtering the second condition and the court of law and how to set it aside. In Canada we're in Canada

in a summer in in terra cotta smear out of the Bihar Ramadan lamp to hell. In Tanaka hacer he and harlot in Tara Kahala side, let me hand arm then Ghana, how sanguine so the first condition, the eligibility who's slaughtering the second condition is he mentions here as mayor. Second to mention the name of Allah the time of slaughtering or setting off the tool of hunting, which is either the bird or the animal of hunting, this is required or also if you set up seconds or something for hunting, at the time you set it up, then you need to make this Mayor dimension the name of Allah on the seconds that you set up for hunting to use to set up cycles, so that the animals run into them

and they leave them. So when do you make the Tasmania when you set up the seconds manager.

So,

this is required if one can speak this, this may as required if one can speak but if one is mute, he or she points to the heavens. If one intentionally neglects to mention the name of Allah, upon the slaughter the animal it is not permissible to eat, if one forgets it is permissible. When hunting if one does not mention the name of Allah, whether that is done intentionally or forget fully, it is not permissible. So, the mention of the name of Allah, when do you mentioned the name of Allah when you are cutting or right before when you are cutting or right before you are you cut the mention of the name of Allah if you basically set off your dog or set off your bird and forget to mention the

name of Allah you can still mention it

after and if you if you're delayed by long, when can you mention the name of Allah like for a long time you are delayed in mentioning the name of Allah you set off your dog and your dog went after the prey. You forgot to mention the name of Allah in the Hanbury madhhab forget from this here does not exempt you or does not is not pardoned is not forgiven. forgetfulness and Betty Metalab is forgiven when in slaughtering cannot in hunting and we will come to say the difference between them and the other mazahub in slaughtering but not hunting. What do you need to do to make this animal halaal to eat?

There's your callback, you sort of

inside the dog. And if if you're inside the dog, but you know, the people, people have their own ways of doing this, but you're inside the dog. If the dog started to run faster after your inciting of the dog years of your dog and had the time of the surgery you made the mention of the name of Allah, the beehive will become paler. So when you set off your doggy for God.

Now, if you can remember right after it's okay. If it is delayed, then you

test your callback you sort of incite your dogs stimulate your dog. If that inciting of your dog makes a difference. The dog starts to run faster, then that may add the time of inciting the dog makes it hard to eat that animal.

Also Tasmania, you know, in the Hanbury madhhab the mayor if you make this mayor and you

basically tried to shoot any of a number of animals and you want to have a number of animals that is Hello.

Whichever animal is hit by this, this man, that is fine. It does not have to be more iron. And that's a controversial issue. That's why you could make this Mayor on a number of animals simultaneously in those machines. It is harder to do this. But if you try to hit a non animal and then your arrow, you make this Mayor thinking that this is an animal turns out to not be an animal but the arrow hits another animal. It's not allowed anyway, it's it's you know, the details may be complicated. The The idea here that I want to convey is this man is very important. This may as obligatory unless you have forgotten, then it is pardon. According to the

HANA fees, Maliki's and ham bellies. So according to the Hanafi is medic, he's on ham bellies. He they make a distinction between him. And Sam is when you forget arm is when you intentionally omit that the smear don't make that this may have been intentionally omitted that is may if you intentionally omitted that as mayor, it is not hallette according to the HANA fees, mannequins and Hungary's if you forget, then it will be Halloween. According to the Hanafi Maliki's and ham bellies. There are some canopies and Harry's and Ebony Tamia who said that whether you remember or whether it is this or that without the Tasmania it is not had

without the dismay, it's not highlighted. Well that's a good omen Malamute kind of smooth layout at the site this is and don't eat from that upon which are over which the name of Allah has not been mentioned. Then they say that this is an absolute don't eat from that over which the name of Allah has not been mentioned one millimeter smoothly.

So, but the gem who make the distinction between armed and disarmed where they say they say that if not best said that a Muslim is in every Muslim, the mismaloya he has Odin that there is the name of Allah is inside the Muslim. It's like built in.

So if he forgets to mention the name of Allah, he can eat. They also mentioned the Hadees of Asia where she said to the Prophet salaam, salaam, yeah, Tina

Malhotra in Abuja had a lot of Indiana.

And let us move upon similarly on a antem workqueue. So I just said to the Prophet sallallahu Sallam people bring food to us and they are new to Islam. We don't know if they are have mentioned the name of Allah subhanaw taala or not and the Prophet sallallahu Sallam said to her, you mentioned the name of Allah and eat you mentioned the name of Allah Annie.

Some people argue that this is founded on Helen is that this is not irrelevant. This text is not relevant to the point of contention, the point of contention that text is about

these are Muslim. The default for them is to treat them like other Muslims, the fact that they are new to Islam, you know, if we start to make like a Muslim with one stripe or Muslim was two stripes, that would be certainly a problem. So once you say that Allah you have all the rights of Muslims, all the obligations of Muslims. That's it, there is no sort of.

It's not a gradual process. It is like, you know, on off switch, once you become Muslim, you are treated like a Muslim. So the Prophet says I don't want it to not start, like a big problem a big fitna and these

will apply whenever you apply to other Muslims.

And if you if you if you are uncomfortable, you say the name of a lion eat the default for those people that they would have learned how to slaughter as Muslims, since they were new to Islam, and they are announced slaughtering maybe they forget that's her concern. They're not used to it. So if you're not used to something and you do it, like if you're not used to saying Bismillah when you slaughter and they use the slaughter all the time to be eat, and if you're not used to it, it is very possible

You forget that the Prophet himself himself does not matter. does this apply to our condition here when we know that someone had forgotten?

The other the, this hadith is about doubt whether someone has forgotten or not. This one we know someone has forgotten, you know, it, it doesn't really apply that much. But still, it is cited in support of the position of the majority that when someone forgets,

you know, if not basses report that you find in the commentary is more sort of explicit on this particular case that we have here.

So, you will have some Hana fees, and you have those libraries and if you have anything here who would say

not,

so, does not really matter, and then you will have the shaftless who say, Does Mason, and whether you leave it out intentionally or absent mindedly, you're fine. It has had, and that is the Shafi position. That is why if someone who were killed is slaughtering an animal and forgets to say the name of Allah, or omits the name of Allah

from the slaughtering, they would make him Domine for anyone except for Chevrolet's, like if you bring someone to slaughter for you, and they do not mention the name of Allah, you will you as they were killed, the agent will pay the fees, medic keys and honeyberries the price of this animal you will not pay the trophy because you will tell them it's hard for you you know

I will not a lot of money

I will not be liable for okay. So that is the part of that is the issue of the smear.

Now, he says here that we're interacting side lamb Yeah, hello Hamden Can I was when hunting if one does not mention the name of a law, whether that is done intentionally or forget fully, it is not permissible. So why are the ham bellies and this is a peculiarity? I'm barely peculiarity, because the rest of them as I have been known, do not make a distinction between slaughtering and hunting. Why are the ham baddies making a distinction between slaughtering and hunting?

One they say that all of the hadith of hunting there is emphasis on this mayor, whether it is Rafa it is Abu Salah or it is are they even Hatton all of the hadith of hunting the the prophets of Salaam was always mentioning this man.

So that emphasis makes it more important than hunting to the say that the you know, the babble site or movement or a website or movement are more restricted, or the app from the web is gay or as

you know.

Yeah. But it is their way of reasoning in here. And they say that people who slaughter the slaughter is sort of like many animals

together, so and so the chances of forgetting are higher than people who hunt. You know, when you're hunting, the chances of forgetting to mention the name of Allah are less

than when you slaughter. These are debatable things. These are scholars trying to rationalize their position, because they made the distinction between hunting and slaughtering. The others did not make the distinction between our finger slaughtering. So now they are trying to tell them here, here are our proofs. Every time the Prophet was out and talked about hunting demons and he stressed the dimension of the name of Allah. You know, hunting is different from slaughtering, it's more restricted, and this and that. Anyway, whatever position you take, there isn't a position in the Hanbury method as well a minor position in embedded MATLAB that is like the majority and that does

not make the distinction between hunting and slaughtering. So if you intentionally omitted, it is not Halloween. If you forget it, it is Halloween, whether it is hunting or slaughtering. If you want to remember that position, that's fine. It is consistent with the majority and this is the majority position.

Then so two conditions now what are the two conditions the remember two conditions.

eligibility of the person who's doing the slaughtering and the mention of the name of Allah notice me

then the sheikh said a 32 and you vecchia boom have that server on Can I mean howdy no harder, no cost of innovating in the sin was

only here at the demo man hora de modo que la la de la he couldn't laser sin was the third to slaughter with a sharp blade, whether it is made of iron, iron, stone, cane, or anything else, except teeth and claws. The Messenger of Allah sallallahu Sallam said, as long as the blood is made to gush out

on here, for

as long as it causes the blood to gush out or as long as the blood is made, to gush out, and the name of allies mentioned what Okay, that's gonna lay out a fur coat and then eat Lysa sin

except for the tooth and the claw,

tooth and the claw.

So

they used to we, you know, the Prophet sallallahu Sallam said, I'm ascending, as for the sin, it is bone, which

means that it is not as,

as for the claws for material habits. As for the claws, they are the knives of the abyssinians. Anyway, the Arabs is sometimes bid wins, sir, from the, you know, the idea of saying all the Arabs are all this world, that is also mistaken, but some of the Arabs used to slaughter the animals with their teeth. Some of the Indians used to slaughter the animals with their claws.

So Islam was a civilizing force in the history of humanity, a huge civilizing force and they disappear very rapidly, the prophets also live well, these sort of

behaviors are really repulsive. So the prophets have told them, you know, anything that is sharp, don't use the Santa Claus, but anything that is sharp.

So, anyway,

it has to be a sharp thing, you know, not Sharpie that you know, it is preferable to be very sharp, but it has to have a heart that has to have an edge, it has to be, it has to cut has to have the it has to have the ability to cut, not like a stone that does not have an edge, it doesn't have to be like a sharp knife. That is preferable that that belongs to Mr. Tibet, with a cotton vaccine or peddler. And if you killed it, you know is about to vaccinate, if you slaughter slaughter with perfection, with excellence with swords of kindness, so, it is it is preferable to be a sharp knife, but not all people have sharp knives and Islam also is a practical religion. So if you can just find

anything that has an edge that can cut, then it would may be harder,

it is preferable to find a knife that is sharp, when your head that hadoken sharp rotta and one of you should sharpen their blade, sharpen their blade, that's a recommendation from the profitsystem but he allowed the use of other sort of things that have a cutting edge, such as, you know,

hiring stone cane or anything else except teeth and claws.

So

then, when it comes to the tools that you can use for hunting, sex, adware or whatever offside, and he has he had a Yoda sila Jerry Hania did a site for in Qatar a site that we had, how boom dopin I will share back at in our cartel Jerry who aside the base of Mattie Hannah who are hungry he

misses not to hungry.

Let me ahead. As for hunting, what matters is to use a sharp pointed tool or set off a trained predatory beast that will ruin the game. If one kills the game using a stone

boondock witches

balls, or as near for if the predatory animal gives it by knocking it out suffocation or shock, it is not permissible. We're talking about what's here

letting the blood gushing out, letting at least some blood gushing out

you have to have something that is pointed

that is sharp to hit the animal with

you cannot when they said bondoc Do you know what bondo means? Now it is rifle. The the code the thrive the code the rifle urban decay, because the bullets inside it, they are like the boondock they used to use in the past to throw the animals you know, so they used to call it bond Okay, it is basically dry mud balls that become very firm, and they used to hit the animals with them. Now, if you hit the animal with a bundle and catch the animal before it dies and slaughter it, it is hilarious.

If you hit the animal with a bundle, and it kills the hannema that is not highlighted.

Now the bullets that we use nowadays don't take the routing of the bundle, not because they share the name they share the ruling because the bondoc had this ruling because it did not make us It did not pierce through the animal. Otherwise the Prophet sallallahu Sallam said they masaba for hazard

whatever hits and pierces then eat the boondock that they have did not pierce the bullets that we have pierce the animal so it is okay bullets are fine. You know hunting with sort of bullets is fine.

But then

so

if one kills the game using a stone boondock or a snare because the snare the animal can suffocate inside this near

without being cut, wherever the predatory animal kills the animal by knocking it out, you know like if you send the off your tiger and it hits the animal and the animal falls dead.

That is not permitted that is not allowed to eat.

And then the shark or you know the knockout or shark or something then it's not have to eat more insolvable murghab akademie kotula behat

Duna makuta they are the if one uses the merab he or she may eat what is killed with its pointed end but not what is killed by its Blanton side.

The same thing something needs to appears to cut to shape the blood and the menorah there's something is like a featherless arrow or it's like a spear that has like side like like a pointed end. If it gives the animal by the side that it knocks knock the animal out. But if it gives the animal by the point at the end then it has color. If it gives the animal by the side and knocks it out then it has not had

when not so bad managerless say do a seven man

for Harper at the side out kottelat who hadn't. If one sets up cycles and mentions the name of Allah. This is where you mentioned the name of Allah when you set up the circles when you set up anything you mentioned the name of Allah anything that would give

if when you set up a snare, it is fine to set up snares, snares. But you don't need to mention the name of Allah when you set up the snares. Why?

Yeah, because in order for you in order for this to be hilarity, you have to catch the animal alive and then slaughter. If the snare kills the animal whether you mentioned the name of a lower knots Mater. It's not Hello, but when you set up sickles and the animals run into the circles, it would wounded the animal the sickles will ruin the animal. And if you find the animal dead,

it's

because the sickos have wounded the animal is hella

so you should mention name of allah at the time you set up the seconds.

You're not gonna do any of that stuff.

firefight wounds

are like the snare

for hunting

wound

for slaughtering and stabbing good when we will come to talk about what needs to be cut in slaughtering

and slaughtering hunting wound period any wound okay.

So we talked about the cycles here

then he said fossil oil started to disappear Now hurry ha Sutton short on hadoo Khomeini akuna philhealth when labor factor boom, well Maria woma topical higher to market

conditions specific to slaughtering by that Hannah subsection there are two conditions specific to slaughtering by SAP HANA the first for the incision to be in the throat, and at the base of the neck, thereby cutting the air tube, trachea and esophagus and that whose cutting is incompatible with life, and that whose cutting is incompatible with life. So, as we said, if we're hunting, it's any wound period, if we're slaughtering or making that partner that is slaughtering or stabbing it has to be in the throat and it is preferable and according to the medic is must be below this bone here See that? protrusion? Yeah, it has to be below it and the animal not above not above it has to

be below

me the throat, then it will be at the base the jacket or not?

And then according to the convention is you will have

is the heat on anyway?

No, it's not.

Or it's not working.

Okay, so what is it that we will we will we want to cut

basically, I'm not good at drawing at all. But this is called the trachea here.

Behind the trachea, you have the esophagus, which is for food.

This is the stomach.

lungs,

you have any more markers.

So the trachea is taking the air to the lungs, the esophagus is taking the food to the stomach.

And then

so let's take this up there.

This is the esophagus here.

That's not it because it's behind the trachea in the front you have the air to behind that you have the esophagus. And then so the heart is here. And then you will have the carotid arteries

that are taking blood from the heart

to the brain. And then you have the jugular veins

that are taking the

target or veins

that are taking the blood from the brain and you know, from up there

to the heart.

So this has blood this has blood this has blood this has blood, this blood. You know the reason why I translate the lewrie dan here as the carotid arteries because they didn't make that distinction and I believe that what is meant is the carotid artery is not the juggler fates because the carotid arteries make the blood gushing.

out not the jugular veins, the jacket our veins, our veins, the pressure inside the veins is very minimal.

And it is the carotid arteries that make the so the two vessels that carry the blood that cause the blood to gush out when they are cut or the carotid arteries.

So in the Hanbury method you need in the Hanbury and the shaft tabs

you need to cut the trachea

that's the air tube, and esophagus.

And that's it, these are the two conditions they have, there is no condition to cut. Well, of course, if you cut the trachea and esophagus there would be some bleeding. You know, and you may likely hit one of the veins or arteries as well. But they are not making a condition to cut the jacket or veins or the carotid arteries, or the let's call them the carotid arteries. And what he then here this is called them the carotid arteries. They're not making that condition.

The hanafis are saying are insane. One, three out of four,

three out of four. So

1234, trachea, esophagus and two carotid arteries. You hit three out of four, esophagus, trachea, one carotid artery, you're good to carotid arteries and esophagus you're good to carotid arteries and trachea. You're good. Three out of four.

The sir the Maliki's said

you need to cut the air tube and the two arteries, the air tubes and the two arteries, that is the trachea and the two vessels, the two blood vessels that run in the neck that caused the blood to gush out. Let's not call them anything the two blood vessels that run in the neck that cause the blood to gush out in order for you to be safe according to all of them, what do you need to do at least

cut the four without cutting the four there will always be another app that does not think it is hollow you have to cut the floor to be safe according to all of them. Now, make sure when you cut the floor that you do not cut off the head of the animal because the HANA fees will not eat them.

Like you leave the head of the animal hanging in the back

because there is an issue about cutting you know because cutting from the back according to the combat is even if you cut from the back but the knee and you kill the animal because before you get to this

then your it is not hard. But if you give the animal

if the animal reaches heartedness boom that is the life of the smarter than him. That's the type of life of a slaughter the animal before you get to these vessels because you cut you cut the spinal cord first when you cut from the back of the spinal cord first and if the animal gets the highest image before you reach those vessels, and then you finish the cutting, it's not part of the accrediting bodies buddies. But if the knife is sharp and then you cut from the back but it is quick and you got to the vessels quickly it is hard

it is harder anyway don't cut from the back and the leads the head of the animal hanging from the back so that the honeybees are comfortable that you that you did not cut off the head. Yeah.

And then

and then

I guess that's it. So don't cut from the back. Cut the four vessels and make this man

and you're good to accordingto you need to be Muslim though. Or gotta be

okay.

Know

this except

the second condition

Hear

which is not, you know, the second condition is not limited to SAP HANA honestly, because even in hunting you're going to have to hunt an animal that has some life, but he made it. The second condition for SAP HANA in particular sunny equinor Fitness Buchi hire us hibou has philomela confy in cahaya did miss boo. When my ob Natasha to lend me a hand. That is why

we're in Lamia handler the Moto acaba nomadic tada can Atlanta Ramona Robbie Salah from for Apsara geria to Nana besotted minhang Amina melta fracassa Tada and further bahat Happy happy for so in an Ibiza la salon dirty camera be clear, the second the presence of life prior to the slaughter in the animal to be slaughtered. It is only if it if it only has the life of an already slaughtered animal highlighted in his book, The life of the slaughter the animal or one whose guts have been removed, like impossible to live because is the guts have been removed, then it will not be made permissible by slaughter through cutting or stabbing. It is not like if it is not like this it becomes

permissible. Do you do the report of cab? We had some sheep grazing outside a mountain near Medina and a girl of ours saw one of them die in mountain meaning like she's like, completely discharged like dying, but not

did not reach the point of the life of the slaughter than

Okay, and a girl of ours saw one of them dying so she broke a stone and slaughter that the Messenger of Allah sallallahu Sallam was asked concerning it and he permitted eating it and then he permitted eating it. So

it is important to that we have they say and Hieronymus dakara because we have you know it Hello, Mr. morale, Mr. Kernan Hatton with Boyle hamster. Nada. It's the ongoing life it's like everybody's life. And Hannah Mustafa is Amara de la mano, after he was stabbed, he had hamster Cara. He was stabbed. It's not hamster hamster cara, to basically yahad and UC and basically give us the sort of

will and so on and

say who leads the supply and kept on talking to them about different things and so on, given them instructions and stuff. So, this hire must occur and then you have hired Miss boo

Orman obion attach motto that is the the person who has been slaughtered or you know, his organs all his intestines and organs were taken out or removed

and that is the different type of hair. So, what is it what are we talking about here? Is it Mr. Mehra the normal life order para which means stable, temporarily stable, transiently stable, or them as boy it is a monster the animal has to have higher must

What is it higher monster para which is temporarily stable or stable life means stable. This is called stable. What is a stable life anything that is more than a boy. So anything that is more than that would be Muslim knows the LMS boy has a life The kickin the you know after you slaughter the animal, the kick and the the shake and the kick and stuff for just a little while and then they die. Any higher life that is more than this is called the monster Cara or stable and does that does the animal have to be moving Give him a hug said prefer that the there would be life and the animal and in an hour they made it a condition that there will be movement but at any rate, it is any life that

is more than done as boy

that is a stable life that applies to hunting as well. Because you can't hunt an animal that is dead or an animal that is bored

or like an animal that has the suffocated for instance and is

does not have high almost a camera or a life that is better or stable life

yes

Regarding stunning

that is this is the conversation regarding stunning and shooting gear sokola high end for reminding me so if the stunning and shooting of the animal will leave more life in the animal than Hatton Miss boo, the life of the slaughter the animal

there would be still a stable life.

That's anything beyond the life of the smaller animal and then you slaughter the animal the animal is hella if the stunning gorgeous shooting brings the animal to the highest earners boo.

Then it is not harder.

Then the SEC said Who Am alacra for whom kutlu bidjar hen fee viral healthy when labor.

As for a hacker it is killing goodbye a wound that is not in the throat or the base of the neck.

That is not awkward or is not side and it is not that it's somewhere in the middle. You have an uncontrollable animal now on controllable animal that is even a domestic that is a domestic animal that became uncontrollable.

You can't really

catch it and keep it down.

We all should have equally hardwired in modules in one human society or

another you're not deaf.

Salmon habitat for Colorado laser law subliminally heavy, Amy our VEDA COVID wash for America back home in half us now.

It is prescribed for any animal that is uncontrollable with our game or livestock. This is because of a report from Apple Rafa, who said that a camel ran away from his owners and they could not pursue it. So one of them shot it with an arrow and was able to cripple it.

The Messenger of Allah sallallahu Sallam said Verily those cattle have wild instincts, instincts like those of the wild beasts, so whichever of them goes beyond your control, then do two with the same. So the cannon ran away. They were unable to catch the camel. He shot it with an arrow. He shot the camera with an arrow. The prophet SAW sort of allowed them to eat it that is called doc fated wounding, uncontrollable element whatever they can animate his game or livestock even whatever the animal is, you could do this to the animal. So that

if you catch if you catch a game animal you have to slaughter it.

You can hunt it.

And if you cannot control how the domestic livestock you get you can fatally wounded whichever way you can.

The animal is in a a fill in a whale for instance. And all you can get two is the leg of the animal wounded and it is hard.

You know you cannot get to the head of the animal to slaughter it. But the animal is right there. But you cannot get to the head who wounded before it dies. It is had

because you cannot slaughter it. So when you cannot slaughter with it whether it is game or livestock wounded, it is harder.

Now if you have game animals

have giraffe that you are actually in control of you have to slaughter it.

You have to slaughter it deer that you are in control of you have to slaughter it or not stab it slaughter anyway slaughter by cutting or stabbing.

So what matters is whether you are in control or not. So you treat a game animal like a domestic one. If you are in control of it. You treat a domestic animal like a game one if you are not in control.

And if you are not in control of it and it is not a way it is there but it is stuck somewhere and it's going to die and you cannot get to the head. You still can wounded fatally wounded and fatally wounded to make it

even better in photography. For jury happy mountain canon in just a matter be he has a clue. That's the point that we just

As mentioned, if I cannot fail in a well and could not be slaughtered by stabbing or so. So, one wounded it anywhere on its body and then it died because of that, it could be permissible it would be permissible to consume would be permissible to consume. So now we have that Hannah rock recite

everything is clear there slaughter by cutting slaughter by stabbing, fated wounding and hunting.

inshallah we will talk a little bit about sort of

stop here and we will come back in five minutes to cover the chapter on or the book of hunting. And we will talk a little bit more about, you know, contemporary issues, I guess you could call the other

shadows lands in Africa today.