Ali Ataie – Abrogation (Naskh) in the Qur’anic Text (Part 5) Qur’anic Sciences Series

Ali Ataie
AI: Summary ©
The transcript discusses the controversial topic of nuts and the difference between legal and ethical implication. It touches on the history of the Bible, the legal system behind it, and the volatile nature of Christian versus Jewish law. The title of the deed is different, but the throne is different, and the Bible is a universal revelation. The segment discusses the history of Islamic law, including its impact on society and the generation of the prophets. The speakers also touch on the use of "will" in religion and the importance of learning about one's religion. The transcript also discusses the use of alcohol and gambling in media and the importance of understanding the meaning behind media coverage.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:03

Today we're talking about NES, NES

00:00:05 --> 00:00:06

known seen

00:00:07 --> 00:00:11

Naskh which means tragedy usually application

00:00:13 --> 00:00:18

cancellation. So this is one of the most difficult, complex,

00:00:18 --> 00:00:22

lengthy controversial topics in Islamic legal theory

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25

and quite often misunderstood.

00:00:27 --> 00:00:33

And like a Scrabble resort, it is not an exact science. So scholars

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35

are very opinionated on this issue. There's a lot of difference

00:00:35 --> 00:00:41

of opinion. Overall, there is consensus that there's definitely

00:00:41 --> 00:00:45

less in the poor, there is a level of abrogation, the real difference

00:00:45 --> 00:00:48

of opinion regarding it is the scope or extent of necessity.

00:00:50 --> 00:00:54

So we'll talk about that and shoulder. So nuts deals generally

00:00:54 --> 00:01:00

reporting Limited Company. Generally, this only applies to I

00:01:00 --> 00:01:04

at that our work. I'm at Morgan Kemet, remember last time we

00:01:04 --> 00:01:08

talked about the Quran itself divides its I added to two groups

00:01:08 --> 00:01:12

with the shabby hat that are multi dimensional, that are obscure,

00:01:12 --> 00:01:18

unclear or anthropomorphic. And then there are commands which are

00:01:18 --> 00:01:23

clear or one dimensional for ayat that have legal and ethical

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26

implications. So when we talk about pneus, we're talking about

00:01:26 --> 00:01:33

if I have that have legal or or ethical implication, essentially I

00:01:33 --> 00:01:39

at ensiling, other I add in the legal aspect, or outward aspect,

00:01:40 --> 00:01:44

or exoteric aspect. So the technical definition that's given

00:01:44 --> 00:01:49

by the aroma of the Quran is referred to missionary be the lead

00:01:49 --> 00:01:50

and shutter shattering

00:01:51 --> 00:01:54

or through a machete in the needle shattering

00:01:56 --> 00:02:02

to remove or lift away a legal ruling by means of illegal proof.

00:02:04 --> 00:02:06

So why only the ASPCA

00:02:08 --> 00:02:11

so why don't verses in the Quran because remember, we divided the I

00:02:11 --> 00:02:15

added the Quran to the division of the heart of the moment desiring

00:02:16 --> 00:02:22

you have I have to deal with Rubia with nebo we with my eyes? These i

00:02:22 --> 00:02:27

After never there's never monsoon they're never abrogated dealing

00:02:27 --> 00:02:31

with Google via Why aren't I had to deal with Google via with

00:02:31 --> 00:02:36

lordly qualities. Why aren't they ever abrogated? Because Allah

00:02:36 --> 00:02:40

subhana wa Tada is immutable, Allah doesn't change. Only our

00:02:40 --> 00:02:45

understandings of Allah subhanho wa taala. Only our understandings

00:02:45 --> 00:02:49

change and are sharpened and are refined. That's what theology

00:02:49 --> 00:02:55

means. Theology is to speak about Allah subhanho wa taala. Right. So

00:02:55 --> 00:02:57

people have different theological

00:02:59 --> 00:03:03

characteristics are different theological understandings, or

00:03:03 --> 00:03:06

descriptions will also come with time.

00:03:08 --> 00:03:12

So we'll come back to this idea in a minute. But nuts involved in the

00:03:12 --> 00:03:20

dial in the dial button dial, which is substitution or

00:03:20 --> 00:03:20

replacement.

00:03:22 --> 00:03:26

So I asked that were forgotten by the prophets of Allah. The Quran

00:03:26 --> 00:03:29

seems to indicate this is a reality. I had forgotten that

00:03:29 --> 00:03:31

replaced with similar I had

00:03:32 --> 00:03:36

or as a reference to the Ashraf we talked about the seven letters of

00:03:36 --> 00:03:42

the Quran that I have revealed in various ways to facilitate

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44

comprehension amongst the Arabs.

00:03:45 --> 00:03:50

So as we said, in the house, they say Maliki Ahmed de Allah is the

00:03:50 --> 00:03:53

Owner, the wash, many pee on the deed, the kings are different

00:03:53 --> 00:03:58

words. Both of them have talks on transmission, both remotely

00:03:58 --> 00:03:59

attested

00:04:00 --> 00:04:03

that go all the way back to the prophets of Allah Barney it was.

00:04:04 --> 00:04:05

This is not given.

00:04:06 --> 00:04:11

You also have something called a good call from Barton in the call,

00:04:12 --> 00:04:14

nullification or cancellation.

00:04:15 --> 00:04:19

This is the cancellation of AI apps that have legal or ethical

00:04:19 --> 00:04:19

import.

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24

The wisdom behind this according to the rule of law is to establish

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27

a precedent of dynamic legalism.

00:04:29 --> 00:04:35

That law changes as time goes on, depending on social location and

00:04:35 --> 00:04:35

context,

00:04:36 --> 00:04:37

the Koran

00:04:38 --> 00:04:40

canceling any Afghan

00:04:44 --> 00:04:48

or it's a reference to the Quran parents canceling many Afghan

00:04:48 --> 00:04:50

found in previous revelations.

00:04:51 --> 00:04:56

Right. So if you look at Jewish law, there's a lot more laws than

00:04:56 --> 00:04:59

what we haven't studied a lot more. Many of them are

00:05:00 --> 00:05:04

have, you know the best or the dark reveal? To silence around the

00:05:04 --> 00:05:08

Quran seems to indicate that but some of them will reveal to

00:05:08 --> 00:05:10

Linnaeus Right, yeah, but they've been cancelled

00:05:11 --> 00:05:16

with the revelation of the Quran, because the Quran is doing

00:05:16 --> 00:05:20

something to Jewish law. It is ameliorating the Jewish law. It's

00:05:20 --> 00:05:26

called tacy. This is a function of pneus of abrogation. It's making

00:05:26 --> 00:05:29

it easier for people. We'll talk about that as well.

00:05:31 --> 00:05:34

Okay, the Quran is a universal

00:05:36 --> 00:05:42

revelation. Right? So it can be difficult, it is something that

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44

should be implemented by everyone on the earth.

00:05:47 --> 00:05:51

So he said that I had that deal with Rubia cannot change because

00:05:51 --> 00:05:54

ALLAH SubhanA, Allah does not change. A lot is immutable, but

00:05:54 --> 00:05:57

only our understandings of God change. Jews and Muslims, for

00:05:57 --> 00:06:01

example, worship the same God. Most people would say, most Jews

00:06:01 --> 00:06:05

and Muslims will say that they both worship the god of people, he

00:06:05 --> 00:06:05

might as

00:06:07 --> 00:06:12

each claim to have a more refined theological understanding. But

00:06:12 --> 00:06:13

it's the same guy.

00:06:15 --> 00:06:18

Jews and Christians, for the most part, believe that they worship

00:06:18 --> 00:06:23

the same God that Abraham, Christians will say they have a

00:06:23 --> 00:06:27

more refined understanding. Not that God changed and became a

00:06:27 --> 00:06:31

trinity. Christians maintain that God was always a trilogy. But this

00:06:31 --> 00:06:36

wasn't revealed yet, until the time of the New Testament, or was

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39

it revealed to the time of a science. And this is something

00:06:39 --> 00:06:43

that Jews and Muslims disagree with?

00:06:44 --> 00:06:47

Obviously, our understandings of God change, but something

00:06:47 --> 00:06:53

something so drastic as a triangle deity, suddenly being revealed at

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56

such a time is unacceptable.

00:06:57 --> 00:07:00

But if you look at sacred law, you look at how volatile you should

00:07:00 --> 00:07:04

know this term. The Jewish counterpart, the Hebrew

00:07:04 --> 00:07:07

counterpart to shut it off is Holika.

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10

Like we say people have hollowed out

00:07:11 --> 00:07:12

but it's a case of like,

00:07:13 --> 00:07:17

this is surely obvious, right? According to their charity out

00:07:19 --> 00:07:20

you can drink wine

00:07:21 --> 00:07:22

in moderation.

00:07:24 --> 00:07:27

So this is a difference we have in the Quran, why is

00:07:29 --> 00:07:34

is not permissible. So this is a function of dusk, that is inter

00:07:34 --> 00:07:38

scriptural. So the Quran abrogating

00:07:40 --> 00:07:44

certain that will reveal to previous prophets.

00:07:45 --> 00:07:48

Why is that because I'll also kind of want to add a new look kind of

00:07:48 --> 00:07:54

alcohol would be drunk towards the end of time. Back in the day, the

00:07:54 --> 00:07:58

pre modern world, someone my size of retirement accounts. If I

00:07:58 --> 00:08:02

wanted to get drunk and have to drink about a gallon of wine, it's

00:08:02 --> 00:08:07

very difficult to get drunk. But now I go to the liquor store. And

00:08:07 --> 00:08:11

I buy you know, 120 Proof, whatever, tequila, two shots and

00:08:11 --> 00:08:13

I'm on the floor. I've never done it.

00:08:14 --> 00:08:18

It could happen. Right? So this is what survive the profit. Some of

00:08:19 --> 00:08:24

you it's an uphill battle to marry some alcohol is the summation of

00:08:24 --> 00:08:31

all sin. Right? And alcohol kills more people than cigarettes.

00:08:31 --> 00:08:37

Definitely. But no alcohol, beer wine, such a big business in

00:08:37 --> 00:08:41

America, that you'll never see any, you know, public service

00:08:41 --> 00:08:42

announcement about

00:08:44 --> 00:08:49

criticizing Budweiser during the Superbowl, quite the opposite.

00:08:50 --> 00:08:50

Right.

00:08:53 --> 00:08:57

Anyway, or like seafood in Jewish law, there's very strict,

00:08:57 --> 00:09:00

meticulous rules about what Jews can eat, that's from the ocean.

00:09:01 --> 00:09:06

They can only fish to have fins and scales. A fish has to have

00:09:06 --> 00:09:13

fins and scale them up. Whereas in Islamic law, it's much easier

00:09:15 --> 00:09:20

depending on which med hat but generally it's easier and there's

00:09:20 --> 00:09:23

other you know, the beard is something that is thought of it

00:09:23 --> 00:09:25

for work with our students.

00:09:27 --> 00:09:32

Even trimming that err on the side is impermissible we have to grow

00:09:32 --> 00:09:33

the laws

00:09:35 --> 00:09:38

so Islamic law has

00:09:40 --> 00:09:43

easier aspect of it

00:09:46 --> 00:09:48

okay, so you know, Western

00:09:50 --> 00:09:55

Islamist as they oftentimes criticize us. It's a this is just

00:09:55 --> 00:09:59

a kind of a clever way that Muslim scholars feel

00:10:00 --> 00:10:03

sort of cover up the fact that the Quran apparently contradicts

00:10:03 --> 00:10:06

itself. So all this is has been abrogated by this.

00:10:07 --> 00:10:10

Right? And they say, well, can God really change his mind?

00:10:11 --> 00:10:15

A lot of Muslims actually murdered Muslims. And I was talking about

00:10:15 --> 00:10:19

this during lecture Masjid a couple of years ago. I think it

00:10:19 --> 00:10:23

was a theology class. And I mentioned this brother jumped all

00:10:23 --> 00:10:26

over me and said, Are you saying that, you know, there's

00:10:26 --> 00:10:30

contradictions in the Quran? Or does Allah change his mind and

00:10:30 --> 00:10:33

things like that. So you have to understand the nature of 10 Zero

00:10:34 --> 00:10:36

10. Zero needs a piecemeal revelation

00:10:37 --> 00:10:41

10 Tenzin piecemeal, progressive revelation,

00:10:42 --> 00:10:43

the Quran was revealed

00:10:45 --> 00:10:46

over 23 years,

00:10:47 --> 00:10:51

the community of the prophets have a lot of setup. It's changing and

00:10:51 --> 00:10:56

growing and evolving. So the very ethos of the sacred law is a

00:10:56 --> 00:11:02

dynamic reality is being shaped around the initial community.

00:11:04 --> 00:11:07

The law as a dynamic reality, this is very, very important. There are

00:11:07 --> 00:11:11

certain things in law in Shediac, that never change. These are

00:11:11 --> 00:11:16

called thought that thought that they never changed. The other

00:11:16 --> 00:11:20

things a lot, many things evolve, that are ones that I got out

00:11:20 --> 00:11:22

variables

00:11:24 --> 00:11:26

and changed according to social location.

00:11:29 --> 00:11:34

So, you know, shifty eyes and some prepackaged 1400 year old law,

00:11:34 --> 00:11:36

here it is, take it or leave it.

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40

If you just look at the chef at school, for example. It's called

00:11:40 --> 00:11:43

the chef at school. It's after its founder, chef in

00:11:44 --> 00:11:48

the 1000s of scholars have contributed to the school, even

00:11:48 --> 00:11:54

today. So if you go into a chef, a book of Shediac, because from 500

00:11:54 --> 00:11:57

years ago, when he tried to look up, what's the fit of the crane on

00:11:57 --> 00:11:58

an airplane?

00:11:59 --> 00:12:01

You're obviously not going to find

00:12:02 --> 00:12:03

his five year old book.

00:12:04 --> 00:12:09

Nowadays be good to go to a chef, a scholar? You asked him, Do I

00:12:09 --> 00:12:10

have to pray on an airplane?

00:12:11 --> 00:12:14

It'll give you an answer. See what a minute look, Chef, and he talked

00:12:14 --> 00:12:19

about airplanes. Know, the nature of the schools is that they're

00:12:19 --> 00:12:25

dynamic, right? They're living there. There's a variable aspect

00:12:25 --> 00:12:29

to these schools, because that's the nature of sacred law. Right?

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32

So there's always a human element, there's an element of HDR

00:12:34 --> 00:12:37

the principles that were laid down, all of a sudden, all of

00:12:37 --> 00:12:42

these fatawa are taken are based on principle juristic principles.

00:12:42 --> 00:12:45

So they're not out of nowhere to come from something, you can

00:12:45 --> 00:12:49

always be tied eventually back to an IRA or to Hadith of the

00:12:49 --> 00:12:50

prophets of Allah.

00:12:53 --> 00:12:57

Okay, that's the nature of sacred law. So abrogation allows people

00:12:57 --> 00:13:01

to adjust to new prescriptions and prescriptions, like growing in

00:13:01 --> 00:13:05

their faith. Remember a mother Ayesha? She said that if adultery

00:13:05 --> 00:13:10

and why are prohibited early in Mecca, very very few people would

00:13:10 --> 00:13:11

become Muslim.

00:13:15 --> 00:13:19

Now, the Quran itself refers to its abrogated aspect.

00:13:20 --> 00:13:25

So this idea of abrogation is not purely a scholastic

00:13:27 --> 00:13:30

idea that doesn't have basis in the Koran.

00:13:31 --> 00:13:36

Pi a number 106 among Bacara is the fundamental ayah that

00:13:36 --> 00:13:37

establishes us.

00:13:38 --> 00:13:44

Allah subhanaw taala says, My men suffering if and only see how DB

00:13:44 --> 00:13:48

failed and min up Oh, literally. And I'm to Allah and Allah, Allah

00:13:48 --> 00:13:49

punishing.

00:13:50 --> 00:13:57

But then, last, right, that none of our verses, do we cancel or

00:13:57 --> 00:14:02

cause to be forgotten, except that we bring in its place something

00:14:02 --> 00:14:03

better, we're similar.

00:14:04 --> 00:14:07

Don't you know that Allah has power over all things?

00:14:08 --> 00:14:14

And then 16 101 Sort of I wonder what what either but then I

00:14:14 --> 00:14:19

attended the Canada I am. Wala who I will be my unit zero

00:14:20 --> 00:14:23

in the Enter booster, but accept

00:14:25 --> 00:14:32

that when we replace one PIAA for another ion, and Allah knows best

00:14:32 --> 00:14:36

what He is revealing. They say you're a forger, or you're just

00:14:36 --> 00:14:37

making this up. This

00:14:38 --> 00:14:41

is what people say today, while he's making this up as you're

00:14:41 --> 00:14:45

going along an exome. But the majority of them they don't

00:14:45 --> 00:14:49

understand the wisdom behind the progressive revelation.

00:14:50 --> 00:14:54

The spirit has to be willing. This is the problem when you have an

00:14:54 --> 00:14:56

Islamic revolution in a country where people are

00:14:58 --> 00:14:59

dancing in clubs and

00:15:00 --> 00:15:04

Drinking alcohol and other che are everywhere. You have to be patient

00:15:05 --> 00:15:09

with people, then you start having things like prayer police walking

00:15:09 --> 00:15:10

around, right?

00:15:12 --> 00:15:16

So that the spirit has to be willing. It's a this is how the

00:15:16 --> 00:15:20

Sahaba were trained. The Sahaba were trained gradually,

00:15:20 --> 00:15:21

progressively.

00:15:23 --> 00:15:26

There's wisdom, you should remember that. Oftentimes we are

00:15:26 --> 00:15:32

brothers, I go overseas for, you know, two or three years. And they

00:15:32 --> 00:15:35

come back with a lot of knowledge. But then they start reviving their

00:15:35 --> 00:15:39

parents. Oh, my dad, you know, he missed the cylinder or doesn't

00:15:39 --> 00:15:44

have a beard or something, you know? What a facet and he started

00:15:44 --> 00:15:46

getting into debates with their parents.

00:15:47 --> 00:15:51

We have to be patient with people we can reach out to especially

00:15:51 --> 00:15:51

with parents.

00:15:53 --> 00:15:57

years later that same young brothers it's back. My dad had so

00:15:57 --> 00:16:01

much wisdom it shouldn't have disrespected him so much. He

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04

didn't have a lot of religious knowledge but wisdom right as he

00:16:04 --> 00:16:09

said, cannot be attained through study only through age

00:16:11 --> 00:16:12

1339

00:16:14 --> 00:16:18

Yamaha hola Omar, your shot you thought that when you fit a lot

00:16:18 --> 00:16:21

cancels what he wants and establishes what he wants.

00:16:23 --> 00:16:26

So I begin to now get put into the in a couple of

00:16:27 --> 00:16:32

keywords that he had to attend to more beginner Rasulullah yet

00:16:32 --> 00:16:35

through Superfund with a hora de haute couture will thank you but

00:16:36 --> 00:16:40

the Quran is described as scrolls in the scrolls are different books

00:16:41 --> 00:16:46

that are made Correct? Who would take him up? By saying Why does

00:16:46 --> 00:16:50

Allah describe the Quran as to what books books need? Correct.

00:16:51 --> 00:16:55

So they are gonna say here, that the meaning of this below is that

00:16:55 --> 00:17:00

the Koran contains the essential teachings, the correct teachings

00:17:00 --> 00:17:02

of the Torah and EG and there's

00:17:04 --> 00:17:08

these books, the essence of these books, is captured in the Quran,

00:17:09 --> 00:17:14

and that the shadow aspect of those books has been abrogated. So

00:17:14 --> 00:17:20

there's no more fatwa based on what Deuteronomy says. You don't

00:17:20 --> 00:17:26

appeal to Jewish law, the shadow aspect of Jewish law is abrogated.

00:17:30 --> 00:17:31

This is called supersessionism.

00:17:33 --> 00:17:36

Right, this idea, it's a Christian idea. The Old Testament covenant

00:17:36 --> 00:17:41

is abrogated by the New Testament. This was standard Christianity.

00:17:42 --> 00:17:47

But the covenant that God made with Bani Israel or not Sinai is

00:17:47 --> 00:17:51

cancelled, because they failed to uphold it. It was a Tuesday was a

00:17:51 --> 00:17:55

two way street. And because many the SWAT team failed to uphold the

00:17:55 --> 00:17:59

covenant, that meet that ability to Hebrew, Allah subhanho wa Taala

00:17:59 --> 00:18:02

extracted is grace from the

00:18:03 --> 00:18:06

engagement to another nation. This is indicated also in the New

00:18:06 --> 00:18:09

Testament esigning Salam, according to Matthew, He says the

00:18:09 --> 00:18:12

Kingdom of God, which is an expression of meaning prophecy,

00:18:12 --> 00:18:16

shall be taken away from you, and given to a nation that bears the

00:18:16 --> 00:18:17

proper fruit.

00:18:20 --> 00:18:24

So this was Denver Christianity. This is definitely what Paul

00:18:24 --> 00:18:26

believes and writes in the New Testament.

00:18:27 --> 00:18:28

But

00:18:29 --> 00:18:30

the Catholic Church had

00:18:32 --> 00:18:38

a council in the 60s called the Vatican two and can 60 to 65 or

00:18:38 --> 00:18:43

there abouts. Where they made major statements. One of the

00:18:43 --> 00:18:47

statements they made was that Christians or Catholics can now

00:18:47 --> 00:18:51

have interfaith dialogue with Muslims. It was impermissible

00:18:51 --> 00:18:54

before that time. I met a Catholic a few weeks ago.

00:18:56 --> 00:19:01

Old lady, she told me I remember a time when it was impermissible for

00:19:01 --> 00:19:02

me to walk into a mosque.

00:19:04 --> 00:19:08

Before the 60s was impermissible, the Prophet sallallahu Sallam had

00:19:08 --> 00:19:12

Christians come into his masjid. And they will not interfere in the

00:19:12 --> 00:19:16

dial. Another thing that the church did during that council

00:19:16 --> 00:19:21

Vatican two is that they apologized to the Jews for blaming

00:19:21 --> 00:19:24

them for deicide or killing God.

00:19:26 --> 00:19:30

And the Vatican was one of the first governments and it's a

00:19:30 --> 00:19:35

government called the people state for the first states to endorse

00:19:35 --> 00:19:36

Hitler's government.

00:19:40 --> 00:19:41

They also

00:19:44 --> 00:19:48

declared that the Jewish covenant is now valid.

00:19:49 --> 00:19:52

Right, so this is called Dual Covenant Theology. So they sort of

00:19:52 --> 00:19:58

revoked this idea that the Jewish covenant is meant to abrogate now

00:19:58 --> 00:19:59

official Catholic doctrine

00:20:00 --> 00:20:04

If you're a practicing Jew, even though you might hear about the

00:20:04 --> 00:20:08

silence a lot, be presented with the gospel and you reject it.

00:20:08 --> 00:20:12

You're not a Catholic. As long as you stay committed to Judaism,

00:20:12 --> 00:20:14

you'll go to heaven. This is another Catholic position.

00:20:18 --> 00:20:19

Okay, so.

00:20:23 --> 00:20:24

So,

00:20:25 --> 00:20:30

beliefs articles of faith, fundamental principles of law,

00:20:30 --> 00:20:35

narrative, spiritual profit, illogical theological verities are

00:20:35 --> 00:20:39

not subject thus, are not subject in us.

00:20:42 --> 00:20:45

suit he also mentioned it was funny, there's a very good book on

00:20:45 --> 00:20:48

the sizes of the Koran if you want something in addition to been done

00:20:49 --> 00:20:53

by a South Asian scholar named Mufti Mohammed Smalley.

00:20:55 --> 00:20:58

It's called an approach to the sciences of the Quran was

00:20:58 --> 00:21:01

translated in English, very good text. I teach from it, that's a

00:21:01 --> 00:21:02

tuna

00:21:04 --> 00:21:09

where he actually goes into some examples from the Bible of NUS. So

00:21:09 --> 00:21:12

this is not a Muslim concept.

00:21:13 --> 00:21:16

So you have what's known as what he calls inter scriptural

00:21:16 --> 00:21:20

abrogation, inter scriptural meaning one scripture abrogates

00:21:20 --> 00:21:23

another, in other words, the New Testament abrogates, the Old

00:21:23 --> 00:21:26

Testament, or the Koran abrogates, the Torah.

00:21:28 --> 00:21:31

And then you have interest, scriptural interest within a into

00:21:31 --> 00:21:33

interest, scriptural abrogation

00:21:35 --> 00:21:37

is when the New Testament in many instances

00:21:39 --> 00:21:41

abrogates itself.

00:21:42 --> 00:21:47

And we find that, for example, in Matthew chapter 10, Jesus tells

00:21:47 --> 00:21:52

the how water you enter you not into any Gentile land, with the

00:21:52 --> 00:21:56

talents of Samaria, Enter ye not, but will rather than for the lost

00:21:56 --> 00:22:00

sheep of the house of Israel. Matthew 15. Think not that I've

00:22:00 --> 00:22:02

come to Matthew 15, he says

00:22:04 --> 00:22:08

that I was only sent to the last week the House of Israel. So in

00:22:08 --> 00:22:11

other words, he's only he's talking to how are you? Only to go

00:22:11 --> 00:22:18

only to go to Jewish homes with the NG don't go to non Jews. When

00:22:18 --> 00:22:23

in Matthew 28, he says go into all nations. Why is that? Because now

00:22:23 --> 00:22:26

the teaching is complete. It's a progressive revelation.

00:22:27 --> 00:22:28

Now they have the full gospel.

00:22:30 --> 00:22:34

So it seems like a contradiction because a way to explain it to us.

00:22:34 --> 00:22:37

The irony is oftentimes, Christians will point to things in

00:22:37 --> 00:22:38

the Quran

00:22:40 --> 00:22:43

and will explain it through the lens of dusk. And they'll say, Oh,

00:22:43 --> 00:22:47

that's very convenient cover up. They have the same concept in

00:22:47 --> 00:22:47

their text.

00:22:49 --> 00:22:53

You have this an example of the New Testament abrogate the Old

00:22:53 --> 00:22:54

Testament

00:22:55 --> 00:22:56

in Jewish law.

00:22:57 --> 00:23:01

And that in divorce is why for any reason, anytime you want. You

00:23:01 --> 00:23:04

could just write a letter to repudiate his wife no problem and

00:23:04 --> 00:23:05

bury somebody else.

00:23:06 --> 00:23:11

He saw a salon parody says if you'd like to do that, you can

00:23:11 --> 00:23:14

only do that if your wife is guilty of pornea which is the

00:23:14 --> 00:23:15

Greek word

00:23:16 --> 00:23:20

which is where we get the word * from a poor nega means

00:23:20 --> 00:23:24

adultery. Only if she commits adultery, can you divorce your

00:23:24 --> 00:23:28

wife? So in this sense, what he's doing is he's making it more

00:23:28 --> 00:23:30

strict. This is going to lead

00:23:32 --> 00:23:32

to steed.

00:23:37 --> 00:23:41

So when it comes to industry, you have to see it in cash you need

00:23:43 --> 00:23:46

to see it means to ameliorate something, make it easier,

00:23:47 --> 00:23:53

make it easier. And this idea is in the Quran, there's actually a

00:23:53 --> 00:23:56

statement attributed to the Saudis in the port.

00:23:58 --> 00:24:02

Number 50 were in silence and unsettled were suddenly talking

00:24:02 --> 00:24:07

about alien DNA in a coal rock. When he hit them up on Battlenet

00:24:07 --> 00:24:14

you hurry Malika? I confirm the Torah. But I also make how some of

00:24:14 --> 00:24:16

the things that were hot out

00:24:18 --> 00:24:23

it's gonna taste you making things easier for people. Right? This is

00:24:23 --> 00:24:25

a function of NUS

00:24:26 --> 00:24:27

but also tissue EEG

00:24:28 --> 00:24:32

intensification to make things more stringent

00:24:33 --> 00:24:35

like what it says in Matthew about divorce

00:24:44 --> 00:24:47

it's it's under the rubric of lesson. There's different types of

00:24:47 --> 00:24:51

loss. One might even describe us as

00:24:53 --> 00:24:57

a refinement of a previous Island and that seems to be how even

00:24:57 --> 00:24:59

Tamia is using it. We'll talk about that.

00:25:00 --> 00:25:04

All of these things so so even dad get a dad substitution replacement

00:25:05 --> 00:25:09

is under the rubric of less than or equal pod. Total cancellation

00:25:10 --> 00:25:15

is under the rubric of nursing. Tastes you amelioration, making

00:25:15 --> 00:25:18

things easier. Tissue deed making things harder.

00:25:22 --> 00:25:23

Okay.

00:25:27 --> 00:25:31

So, a few terms here, the abrogating verse in Arabic is

00:25:31 --> 00:25:36

called Nassif, Nassif, that's the verb. That's the verse that's

00:25:36 --> 00:25:42

abrogating, the abrogated diverse a canceled verse with a refined

00:25:42 --> 00:25:47

diversity will is called Min Soo. So these are active and passive

00:25:47 --> 00:25:50

partisan fighting methods. NASA minzu.

00:25:51 --> 00:25:53

The classic example.

00:25:55 --> 00:25:55

Let's talk about

00:25:56 --> 00:25:58

the classic example of this

00:26:00 --> 00:26:02

is the graduate prohibition of alcohol.

00:26:03 --> 00:26:07

So you have mdsap, I have 43.

00:26:09 --> 00:26:12

And that's probably what that is. And this is a lengthy iron. Yeah,

00:26:12 --> 00:26:14

you're gonna need a laptop

00:26:15 --> 00:26:16

to sukar

00:26:17 --> 00:26:17

chapter

00:26:20 --> 00:26:21

or you believe.

00:26:23 --> 00:26:28

Don't approach the prayer while you are intoxicated, until you can

00:26:28 --> 00:26:29

understand what you're saying.

00:26:32 --> 00:26:36

short time later, you have to 19 and Bacara revealed to the Prophet

00:26:36 --> 00:26:41

salallahu Salam, which is now making a moral argument against

00:26:41 --> 00:26:42

alcohol

00:26:43 --> 00:26:48

that summer and Mesa. So alcohol and gambling, it says

00:26:50 --> 00:26:51

industry but

00:26:52 --> 00:26:56

the harm of them is more than their benefits.

00:26:57 --> 00:27:01

This is no an argument we're on the road to NUS

00:27:02 --> 00:27:08

and then not either either number 9590 a loss dataset about

00:27:10 --> 00:27:14

alcohol and gambling fudge, Teddy boo boo, riches of the abolition,

00:27:15 --> 00:27:21

fetch candy boo, they are an abomination of Satan's handiwork

00:27:21 --> 00:27:23

shun them completely

00:27:30 --> 00:27:34

so how do we go about this? What is it based on? It's based on

00:27:34 --> 00:27:35

reliable reports

00:27:36 --> 00:27:39

from the Prophet satellite Center and the companion

00:27:40 --> 00:27:46

similar to how the zoo was was no, there's also an element of HDR

00:27:46 --> 00:27:47

from the scholars.

00:27:48 --> 00:27:52

It's good to be with the majority of the line but I do not have the

00:27:52 --> 00:27:56

protection of guys but the majority of the talk about four

00:27:56 --> 00:27:57

classes of abrogation

00:27:59 --> 00:28:02

four classes, you have come on abrogated abrogating

00:28:03 --> 00:28:06

like the wine example, the alcohol itself

00:28:07 --> 00:28:08

upon abrogating

00:28:11 --> 00:28:15

all classical scholars believe in intro, Quranic abrogation

00:28:16 --> 00:28:20

the difference of opinion again is the extent or scope of the

00:28:20 --> 00:28:22

abrogation in the park

00:28:23 --> 00:28:25

there's always a difference of opinion about everything except

00:28:25 --> 00:28:27

the three questions in your brain

00:28:31 --> 00:28:35

that's why that's the wisdom of the three questions. There's only

00:28:35 --> 00:28:37

one answer to each question.

00:28:38 --> 00:28:43

Lender up who whose reward lender the Yukon who is your Prophet

00:28:43 --> 00:28:45

Matthew What is your religion

00:28:46 --> 00:28:52

so you're not gonna be asked Matt Matt happened man cheerful

00:28:54 --> 00:28:56

man sorry. Tell you

00:28:57 --> 00:28:58

these questions I

00:28:59 --> 00:29:02

mean, they're there they facilitate our understanding of

00:29:02 --> 00:29:06

are more in the profit in that religion. But there's more than

00:29:06 --> 00:29:09

one answer to those questions. But these three there's one answer

00:29:09 --> 00:29:10

knowing or not.

00:29:12 --> 00:29:13

So

00:29:14 --> 00:29:19

according to security, aggregation happens 19 times and that's it

00:29:21 --> 00:29:26

19 times some REITs Realty differently take no means 21

00:29:27 --> 00:29:27

But

00:29:29 --> 00:29:32

according to the translation of the discount like 19 times

00:29:34 --> 00:29:39

more modern scholar Shalini EULA Indian scholar like 1762.

00:29:40 --> 00:29:44

He says it's only actually five times

00:29:45 --> 00:29:45

and

00:29:47 --> 00:29:48

we'll talk about why there's a difference of opinion here

00:29:50 --> 00:29:53

in a minute, but basically, according to Ben, take me up the

00:29:53 --> 00:29:59

center use the word NUS very broadly, to celebrate the early

00:29:59 --> 00:29:59

Muslims

00:30:01 --> 00:30:03

When they say this is monsoon

00:30:04 --> 00:30:08

they really meant that this idea has been refined by a number not

00:30:08 --> 00:30:09

absolutely nullified.

00:30:11 --> 00:30:15

Right? That's how they're using it to have the later scholars, when

00:30:15 --> 00:30:18

they say best, they tend to be absolute glorification.

00:30:21 --> 00:30:26

Give me an example. In Me Imran one or two, Allah subhanaw taala

00:30:26 --> 00:30:31

says, Yeah, you really need it, tap Allah Chattarpur potty or you

00:30:31 --> 00:30:34

will believe to your Allah as he has the right to be feared.

00:30:36 --> 00:30:41

So let's hop over were saying, Wow, can we fear Allah as it is

00:30:41 --> 00:30:44

right? So the ayah was revealed

00:30:45 --> 00:30:46

through the 64

00:30:47 --> 00:30:53

verse number 16, for Topo la must attack, fear Allah as much as you

00:30:53 --> 00:30:53

can.

00:30:55 --> 00:30:59

So Is there really an abrogation happening here?

00:31:00 --> 00:31:06

The goal is the same fear Allah as is the right of Allah. So kind of

00:31:06 --> 00:31:08

what the goal remains.

00:31:09 --> 00:31:10

But the method

00:31:11 --> 00:31:15

is now revealed. So there's a refinement of how to get to the

00:31:15 --> 00:31:19

goal. How do we how do we feel alone, in other words, as this is

00:31:19 --> 00:31:21

right, by fearing as much as you can,

00:31:24 --> 00:31:27

so the seller did not mean absolute vilification.

00:31:30 --> 00:31:33

Or if you look at what you know soon he says it is

00:31:34 --> 00:31:38

mentioned this last week also about the verse in the Quran and

00:31:38 --> 00:31:39

up to 190.

00:31:40 --> 00:31:43

Allah says Makati Luffy is a BB legale in your party look at what

00:31:43 --> 00:31:48

I try to do in the wildlife people were attacking, fight those who

00:31:48 --> 00:31:49

are finding you

00:31:50 --> 00:31:55

but do not go to extremes a lot does not love extremists. chapter

00:31:55 --> 00:31:58

two verse one nine you might see what he says this idea is

00:31:58 --> 00:32:04

abrogated the first part of October, but I will label assuming

00:32:04 --> 00:32:08

that you know a declaration of immunity by Allah and His

00:32:08 --> 00:32:11

Messenger breaking all covenants with machine King attack the

00:32:11 --> 00:32:16

machine again wherever you find them. Right. So what he means by

00:32:16 --> 00:32:22

that, is that the first part of Toba abrogates that verse apart

00:32:22 --> 00:32:24

off in its immediate context

00:32:25 --> 00:32:27

right it's not indefinitely abrogated

00:32:29 --> 00:32:31

fight those who are fighting you Okay, anarchy fighting with right

00:32:31 --> 00:32:32

one.

00:32:33 --> 00:32:33

There's nothing on the Earth.

00:32:35 --> 00:32:38

Even if there's abrogation. There's a

00:32:40 --> 00:32:44

lot of times there's a very cost very specific context to that

00:32:44 --> 00:32:48

abrogation. That's not a blanket abrogation.

00:32:49 --> 00:32:51

These things take a lot of HD.

00:32:52 --> 00:32:55

They take knowledge of Hadith knowledge of Syrah

00:32:57 --> 00:32:58

technology to see you

00:33:02 --> 00:33:04

but it's not the simple you know, okay, whatever is in Medina

00:33:05 --> 00:33:06

abrogates Mecca No,

00:33:07 --> 00:33:12

that's how a lot of kuffaar present nuskin the Quran.

00:33:14 --> 00:33:16

So one of the last

00:33:17 --> 00:33:22

sutras to be revealed was October. So this Oh Toba, which describes

00:33:22 --> 00:33:26

the rules of engagement, what to do with it. People commit Fianna

00:33:26 --> 00:33:30

against the muscle polity. Oh, that's the sore muscles going back

00:33:31 --> 00:33:37

in history doesn't bear that out. When Muslims were going into

00:33:37 --> 00:33:41

different lands, they didn't you know, just slaughter everyone

00:33:41 --> 00:33:46

wholesale. There's no evidence of that in North Africa. People

00:33:46 --> 00:33:49

willingly became Muslim. You don't even admit this. There's a book

00:33:49 --> 00:33:53

called answering Islam was the website was a book written in the

00:33:53 --> 00:33:59

early 90s by Norman Geisler, a big, anti Muslim polemicist. And

00:33:59 --> 00:34:03

his ghost writer up on Sunday, he says that he has a spread in Saudi

00:34:03 --> 00:34:08

was a former Muslim, Abu Salim slave, the cross, but he probably

00:34:08 --> 00:34:11

doesn't exist. Obviously, that's probably a figment of his

00:34:11 --> 00:34:13

imagination. A lot of these Christian guys in order to sort of

00:34:13 --> 00:34:15

bolster their work.

00:34:16 --> 00:34:20

They sort of make up some this guy. So he knows what he's talking

00:34:20 --> 00:34:26

about. Anyway, he says in that book, many, many Christians in

00:34:26 --> 00:34:31

North Africa willingly accepted Islam because of Islam stress on

00:34:31 --> 00:34:36

brotherhood and low taxes. That's what he says in that book.

00:34:39 --> 00:34:43

Because there's no historical evidence of wholesale bloodshed of

00:34:43 --> 00:34:44

invading Muslim armies.

00:34:46 --> 00:34:49

You take the largest Muslim country, Indonesia

00:34:50 --> 00:34:57

882 jar that also a traders, traders. So like Trader Joe's

00:34:57 --> 00:34:58

tagit

00:35:00 --> 00:35:04

merchants take merchants they weapon to Indonesia. And they just

00:35:04 --> 00:35:06

showed good character.

00:35:07 --> 00:35:11

And they have to literally was in Indonesia. A Muslim soldier never

00:35:11 --> 00:35:13

stepped foot on the soil of Indonesia.

00:35:14 --> 00:35:18

People can't explain that also in a debate one time in America with

00:35:18 --> 00:35:22

a guy named Lakota. And he said his argument was people in

00:35:22 --> 00:35:25

America, because I said 20,000 People in America become Muslim.

00:35:25 --> 00:35:29

And it's not due to immigration. I'm talking about black Americans,

00:35:29 --> 00:35:32

white Americans, Latino Americans. And he said, Well, that's because

00:35:32 --> 00:35:34

it's almost spread by the sword.

00:35:36 --> 00:35:38

Who has a gun to people's heads.

00:35:39 --> 00:35:43

So walk around from behind the podium and walk so if you've seen

00:35:43 --> 00:35:47

a weapon on me, and I turned around and said, I must have left

00:35:47 --> 00:35:50

it outside next to my camel, that's double parked, right?

00:35:52 --> 00:35:57

And it's just nonsensical. It deserves to be ridiculed, but they

00:35:57 --> 00:36:01

say another argument is, men become Muslim in America because

00:36:01 --> 00:36:03

they want to practice polygamy.

00:36:04 --> 00:36:07

How many Muslims do you know? Erykah Badu Muslim men in America?

00:36:07 --> 00:36:10

Do you know that more than one wife? I mean, certainly that's not

00:36:10 --> 00:36:15

a major factor why people becoming Muslim don't want to admit people

00:36:15 --> 00:36:17

become Muslim because they believe it's true.

00:36:27 --> 00:36:31

Okay, so put on abrogating Quran is one class of application

00:36:33 --> 00:36:34

but very limited.

00:36:35 --> 00:36:38

Then you have Poron abrogating sadhana,

00:36:40 --> 00:36:44

for example. And sunnah is not just happy, it's authenticated,

00:36:44 --> 00:36:48

happy. The normative practice of the Prophet is sunnah. We believe

00:36:48 --> 00:36:51

in the cylinder, right? There's some people who conflate the two

00:36:51 --> 00:36:54

and so how do you you know, some of them are weak. Of course, some

00:36:54 --> 00:36:57

of them are weak, some of them are are forged. He'd have a mobile app

00:36:57 --> 00:37:01

with no Josie has a whole book on forged it. So, this

00:37:03 --> 00:37:04

is somewhat of an informative

00:37:05 --> 00:37:09

the agreed upon ethos, the agreed upon normative practice of the

00:37:09 --> 00:37:15

Prophet Solomon. So this practice was to follow Adam kitap

00:37:16 --> 00:37:20

Against The Machine, when there was no a command from Allah. So

00:37:20 --> 00:37:25

you will face later notice for the Salah, right if you face

00:37:25 --> 00:37:29

Jerusalem, and then the I was revealed in 144

00:37:30 --> 00:37:35

to face mecca for one thing which I got shot to the Masjid Al haram,

00:37:35 --> 00:37:37

turn your face towards the Inviolable box

00:37:39 --> 00:37:40

for about abrogating sooner.

00:37:44 --> 00:37:47

Then you have the controversial classification,

00:37:48 --> 00:37:51

which not agreed upon sunder abrogating for

00:37:53 --> 00:37:56

the Hannity's believe it's possible. The Maliki's believe

00:37:56 --> 00:38:01

it's possible in the shower the Jaffa is if you will also believe

00:38:01 --> 00:38:04

it's possible that sooner to fabricate the Koran

00:38:05 --> 00:38:10

but only sooner that is considered to be to lotto multiple attested

00:38:12 --> 00:38:17

and the proof texts of the enough is sort of legend while Maya or

00:38:17 --> 00:38:20

any power the Prophet never speaks from tower

00:38:21 --> 00:38:26

in whatever watching everything he says is why so if we know if it's

00:38:26 --> 00:38:28

multiplayer tested that this is definitely what he said

00:38:29 --> 00:38:34

in a hadith as well and if it's still something he said and it's

00:38:34 --> 00:38:34

watching

00:38:35 --> 00:38:39

so it's possible for a multiplayer testing Aggie to abrogate

00:38:39 --> 00:38:43

something in the Quran. Of course the Hanafis Malik is

00:38:47 --> 00:38:52

the chef Aries the knight this is sort of different buttons. Imam

00:38:52 --> 00:38:56

Shafi position was the sun is never as strong as the point one

00:38:58 --> 00:38:59

and he points to an eye and

00:39:00 --> 00:39:04

so the unis either 50 with a machete can come to the offices

00:39:05 --> 00:39:08

and they say this isn't good for arm but changing a little bit

00:39:10 --> 00:39:14

is a major corner the angle but the law is not for me to change

00:39:14 --> 00:39:14

anything.

00:39:15 --> 00:39:20

So this is the proof text that no sunnah, no matter how strong

00:39:21 --> 00:39:23

can abrogate the Koran.

00:39:24 --> 00:39:27

And there is a difference of opinion as to what you want Shafi

00:39:27 --> 00:39:31

is actually an actual opinion was that he just believe it's not

00:39:31 --> 00:39:33

possible or did he believe that it never just occurred.

00:39:37 --> 00:39:40

So that's a controversial one. So navigating,

00:39:41 --> 00:39:43

and then you have Sundar abrogating sadhana which is

00:39:45 --> 00:39:49

agreed upon. You might have 40 Hadith on one issued.

00:39:51 --> 00:39:54

To give you a good example, that says do not go to graveyards.

00:39:56 --> 00:39:58

Another heavy that says go to graveyards.

00:40:00 --> 00:40:05

All right. So if one isn't initiated in the sciences of heavy

00:40:08 --> 00:40:12

one to make grave errors in deriving rulings from Hadith. So

00:40:12 --> 00:40:17

these sound six books to haughty Muslim, we have them in our homes

00:40:18 --> 00:40:20

for Baraka, we can read them,

00:40:21 --> 00:40:25

but don't extract legal rulings from them. That's for the Oregon

00:40:25 --> 00:40:29

law. That's what they were written for. That was the intention of the

00:40:29 --> 00:40:33

mobile Hardy was to write these things for hula know how to deal

00:40:33 --> 00:40:34

with them.

00:40:37 --> 00:40:38

So

00:40:40 --> 00:40:43

how do we deal with the graveyards issue? Well, initially, the

00:40:43 --> 00:40:44

profits of the bodies

00:40:45 --> 00:40:49

DB impermissible for this hobby to go to graveyards, because many of

00:40:49 --> 00:40:51

them would go there and worship their ancestors.

00:40:53 --> 00:40:57

So they're coming out of jail. Right? So he's weaning them off of

00:40:57 --> 00:41:02

that. So it's forbidden to not go. And then in the medieval period,

00:41:03 --> 00:41:07

what they're established is to eat now it's permissible, go to the

00:41:07 --> 00:41:13

graveyard. You know, pray for the dead recycler on Twitter, and then

00:41:13 --> 00:41:19

leave document these excesses. Don't circumambulate them, don't

00:41:19 --> 00:41:20

grab them and use them and rub them

00:41:21 --> 00:41:24

these types of things don't pray no power towards them.

00:41:26 --> 00:41:31

Please wean them off. This is the wisdom behind abrogation

00:41:38 --> 00:41:40

another example of oh

00:41:41 --> 00:41:42

yeah, that's good.

00:41:55 --> 00:41:59

Okay, so he said according to the according to the definition of

00:41:59 --> 00:42:05

mescaline, the definition of the Salah later scholars

00:42:06 --> 00:42:08

that is absolute

00:42:09 --> 00:42:10

absolute negation.

00:42:11 --> 00:42:14

So ut says it happens 19 times in the fall.

00:44:00 --> 00:44:06

In the Quran, we have this will talk me through the tilava. Thus,

00:44:06 --> 00:44:11

I'll hook me to that in our we have an abrogation of the legal

00:44:11 --> 00:44:15

ruling without its recited iron.

00:44:16 --> 00:44:20

So in other words, the iron is still recited, but the legal

00:44:20 --> 00:44:22

ruling has been fabricated.

00:44:23 --> 00:44:27

For example, the verse about why 443

00:44:28 --> 00:44:33

letter from Supra don't come to the prayer while you're

00:44:33 --> 00:44:34

intoxicated.

00:44:35 --> 00:44:39

Now that doesn't mean that the ayah has no meaning anymore.

00:44:41 --> 00:44:43

Remember that he said what did Qurani volume

00:44:45 --> 00:44:48

there's an exoteric meaning to the Koran can be so Tarik meaning.

00:44:50 --> 00:44:55

Mo Jaffa sada who is a mom about a sunnah. He said every verse of the

00:44:55 --> 00:44:59

Quran has four layers of meaning. He called them by the fall you

00:45:00 --> 00:45:03

Keyshawn rocks Lokar F and haka

00:45:04 --> 00:45:06

the expression

00:45:07 --> 00:45:13

the illusions, illusions, the subtleties and the realities of

00:45:13 --> 00:45:17

the earth. And I would argue here sukar Robinson toxicated. But

00:45:17 --> 00:45:19

there's different meanings.

00:45:20 --> 00:45:21

It could mean distracted.

00:45:22 --> 00:45:25

We'll come to the prayer while distracted. So we've talked about

00:45:25 --> 00:45:28

thus we're talking about the esoteric meaning has been lifted.

00:45:29 --> 00:45:33

The very clear, apparent meaning, don't come to the prayer,

00:45:33 --> 00:45:38

intoxicated on wine. That's clear. But there's other meanings that

00:45:38 --> 00:45:40

are there that are isa Tarik in nature.

00:45:41 --> 00:45:44

You know, in other words, serial, but don't be in toxic with dunya

00:45:44 --> 00:45:46

with worry with despair.

00:45:47 --> 00:45:50

Right. Get that out of your mind and then come to the grip.

00:45:51 --> 00:45:54

So there is a meaning that still there's an esoteric meaning that's

00:45:54 --> 00:45:55

good for all time.

00:45:58 --> 00:46:00

Just to make that clear, as well.

00:46:02 --> 00:46:06

So as we said, the court has a definition of necessity. If you

00:46:06 --> 00:46:10

don't see it says it's gone. There's 19 Or so I have to report

00:46:10 --> 00:46:13

on that or abrogate trouble you will not he said that happens only

00:46:13 --> 00:46:17

five times. And none of the five times that show when you love

00:46:19 --> 00:46:20

demonstrates has anything to do with

00:46:22 --> 00:46:24

the latter class the debrief

00:46:27 --> 00:46:29

or that I have to save activates

00:46:31 --> 00:46:34

diversity so sword abrogates any of the so called peaceful verses

00:46:34 --> 00:46:35

of the Quran.

00:46:38 --> 00:46:40

Now, others disagree and say there's no application in the

00:46:40 --> 00:46:41

forum.

00:46:42 --> 00:46:46

Content there actually no sound reports on this issue at all. More

00:46:46 --> 00:46:52

modern is a more modern opinion. Right. The trend nowadays is sort

00:46:52 --> 00:46:56

of to downplay thus. So Ashima say back met

00:46:58 --> 00:47:01

the founder of the nega University in India. He did not believe

00:47:01 --> 00:47:02

there's obligation in the form

00:47:04 --> 00:47:08

of an Abu Sheikh Mohammed la Egyptian reformists are called Neo

00:47:08 --> 00:47:12

Baroque because he like proto Salafi whatever people refer to

00:47:12 --> 00:47:13

them.

00:47:14 --> 00:47:17

They did not affirm abrogation in the bottom number, position is

00:47:17 --> 00:47:23

that there is no obligation. So what does it like? Island was the

00:47:24 --> 00:47:25

Muslim and it's funny.

00:47:27 --> 00:47:32

It's funny, you said that there's no there's no intro or UnYk

00:47:32 --> 00:47:35

application. The Quran does not abrogate itself. There's only

00:47:35 --> 00:47:40

inter scripture, abrogation, meaning the Quran abrogates the

00:47:40 --> 00:47:43

act of the Torah add.

00:47:48 --> 00:47:51

Some would say that these are not really applications, they're more

00:47:51 --> 00:47:53

specifications.

00:47:54 --> 00:47:58

One verse explains another in more detail or according to special

00:47:58 --> 00:48:04

circumstances. So going back to the wine example 590 says wine is

00:48:04 --> 00:48:04

forbidden.

00:48:05 --> 00:48:10

Okay, for 43 sets, but you know, if you happen to get drunk, then

00:48:10 --> 00:48:12

just don't come to the prayer and then muster

00:48:14 --> 00:48:19

the two 119 to 290 says there's some benefit of alcohol, so you

00:48:19 --> 00:48:23

can't use that as an excuse for moderate drinking. So really,

00:48:23 --> 00:48:24

there's no abrogation here

00:48:28 --> 00:48:29

or specifications.

00:48:43 --> 00:48:45

Yeah, so you do have

00:48:47 --> 00:48:51

the honorable mention. You have abrogation of the recited verse

00:48:51 --> 00:48:54

with its legal ruling. But there's only one example they can think

00:48:54 --> 00:48:58

of, apparently is a Muslim, I shall reveals, though, says there

00:48:58 --> 00:49:03

was a verse that dealt with something like 10 Somethings that

00:49:03 --> 00:49:07

make a marriage impermissible than it was then was reduced to five.

00:49:07 --> 00:49:11

It's a very enigmatic statement she's making, but apparently there

00:49:11 --> 00:49:14

wasn't I like that a double of 10 sucklings and validate a marriage

00:49:17 --> 00:49:20

that's no longer recited in the forearm and the legal ruling is no

00:49:20 --> 00:49:21

longer applied.

00:49:22 --> 00:49:25

But some would say that this report is spurious.

00:49:28 --> 00:49:29

Or it can refer to

00:49:33 --> 00:49:37

something that is related to the action of the Quran, where you

00:49:37 --> 00:49:38

have

00:49:39 --> 00:49:42

synonyms in some Surah Sua

00:49:44 --> 00:49:48

is that for example, that the most half of the witness rude, he says,

00:49:48 --> 00:49:51

What's going on Japan? Castlefield lanforge. It's

00:49:53 --> 00:49:57

so is a possum is wo two seven. So this could have been

00:49:59 --> 00:49:59

a

00:50:00 --> 00:50:02

In a form that was revealed to the province of Ohio,

00:50:04 --> 00:50:07

in order to facilitate understanding of the certain Eric

00:50:07 --> 00:50:10

tribe, that didn't use another, the other word.

00:50:13 --> 00:50:17

But over time that that version of the eye if you will,

00:50:18 --> 00:50:22

just fell out of use wasn't, wasn't recited anymore. So that

00:50:22 --> 00:50:23

says it was forgotten.

00:50:25 --> 00:50:29

Or the moment to say that that moon c hat is really referring to

00:50:29 --> 00:50:31

the previous scriptures.

00:50:33 --> 00:50:37

We don't have authentic Scriptures or the Torah. So I'll replace them

00:50:37 --> 00:50:40

with the Koran. Something better or similar?

00:50:42 --> 00:50:43

Was the majority of

00:50:45 --> 00:50:50

the majority opinion is that the Sunnah is that there's definitely

00:50:50 --> 00:50:51

an aggregated aspect in

00:50:53 --> 00:50:54

the Quran

00:50:56 --> 00:50:58

does abrogate sort of africat within itself.

00:51:00 --> 00:51:03

And that's across the board from classical scholars, the modern

00:51:03 --> 00:51:06

trend denies that and that's based on you know, that's based on

00:51:06 --> 00:51:07

scholarship and that's something

00:51:08 --> 00:51:10

to take seriously.

00:51:11 --> 00:51:14

But the real difference of opinion amongst the setup was the extent

00:51:14 --> 00:51:15

of application

00:51:16 --> 00:51:18

how often this has happened in the

00:51:21 --> 00:51:21

Yeah

00:51:27 --> 00:51:30

besides the 632

00:51:31 --> 00:51:35

combination beginning of sorrows, or any other priors, that the

00:51:35 --> 00:51:38

meaning the general meaning is agreed upon.

00:51:41 --> 00:51:45

No one can say complete certainty. Is there any other items? Yeah,

00:51:45 --> 00:51:46

the if the two shall be hot.

00:51:48 --> 00:51:50

So verses in the Quran that

00:51:52 --> 00:51:55

that have theological implications?

00:51:57 --> 00:52:01

Or is that seem to present?

00:52:04 --> 00:52:07

Allah Subhan Allah to Allah as having the qualities of creation

00:52:07 --> 00:52:08

using words that

00:52:09 --> 00:52:11

may conjure up physical images

00:52:13 --> 00:52:13

to let us know

00:52:15 --> 00:52:16

that he is the word the harsh

00:52:18 --> 00:52:21

what does that mean? Somebody asks people now think about that.

00:52:22 --> 00:52:27

Right? Do we go into that? Begin with admitted so it's not one of

00:52:27 --> 00:52:30

the things that is still up is do looses to sit with Arash, one of

00:52:30 --> 00:52:31

the days of arches

00:52:33 --> 00:52:36

footstool or bench or chair

00:52:37 --> 00:52:41

so I met Kenny law Malik and he said What is it a star archery and

00:52:41 --> 00:52:45

he was one of a photo anthropomorphised letter from

00:52:45 --> 00:52:49

refers to someone who believes that God has body parts he's in

00:52:49 --> 00:52:51

space and they don't matter.

00:52:52 --> 00:52:57

So in America, he said it's still not at all the verb is the wise in

00:52:57 --> 00:52:58

the Quran there's no doubt

00:52:59 --> 00:53:01

that he said caveator Who very well

00:53:04 --> 00:53:07

that how is it still out it's beyond your

00:53:08 --> 00:53:09

comprehension

00:53:10 --> 00:53:15

was so I'm going to ask him about it is innovation.

00:53:16 --> 00:53:18

So nobody really knows what that means.

00:53:20 --> 00:53:24

And the tendency of the Sabbath was to leave the meeting to God

00:53:24 --> 00:53:29

it's called tough wield. Allah knows what it means whatever it

00:53:29 --> 00:53:33

is, whatever it is becoming of His greatness and majesty

00:53:34 --> 00:53:37

love where it lays it in this relation and they leave it

00:53:38 --> 00:53:39

wouldn't call it

00:53:41 --> 00:53:44

hello sometimes would comment on these things because you have

00:53:44 --> 00:53:47

other muscle groups saying deviant things about these if

00:53:48 --> 00:53:50

so the shabby had

00:53:52 --> 00:53:56

the Quran says that however, the verses that are that are easily

00:53:56 --> 00:54:01

understood there will teach there the essence of the book. So if you

00:54:01 --> 00:54:05

even in translation, you'll get the essence of the Quranic of the

00:54:05 --> 00:54:07

Quran teaching for the work

00:54:10 --> 00:54:16

are there any is there any verses in the Quran right now that we

00:54:16 --> 00:54:17

still don't know?

00:54:18 --> 00:54:19

Of course Yeah.

00:54:20 --> 00:54:21

Yeah.

00:54:23 --> 00:54:24

I mean,

00:54:25 --> 00:54:26

I mean that same

00:54:27 --> 00:54:31

scene Yes. replies to that. I mean, they're they're tough SEO

00:54:31 --> 00:54:31

for every item

00:54:33 --> 00:54:37

with the with the i f that are too shabby, either obscure or

00:54:37 --> 00:54:39

theological. multi-dimensional.

00:54:41 --> 00:54:42

These are certainly

00:54:45 --> 00:54:47

these are certainly open to further inquiry.

00:54:50 --> 00:54:52

Are they big a number I guess is my question.

00:54:53 --> 00:54:54

No,

00:55:00 --> 00:55:00

And again, the

00:55:03 --> 00:55:04

the essence of the text.

00:55:09 --> 00:55:11

So those are easily understood, even with shabby hot

00:55:13 --> 00:55:13

reader

00:55:15 --> 00:55:18

that if you really good to see her on, it's pretty clear what

00:55:18 --> 00:55:24

apparently, you're saying. But it is a universal scripture and it's

00:55:24 --> 00:55:25

good for all time.

00:55:27 --> 00:55:30

So that's the point of modern FCM is to make the point on relevant

00:55:32 --> 00:55:33

for

00:55:34 --> 00:55:35

different audiences.

00:55:39 --> 00:55:43

You say he said there are nine innovations. Yeah. And

00:55:45 --> 00:55:48

it didn't because they did the same thing differently. Your

00:55:48 --> 00:55:51

interpretation different reading the same thing, right. So

00:55:55 --> 00:55:57

they justify rationalize.

00:56:00 --> 00:56:02

Yeah, it's all about how you define us.

00:56:04 --> 00:56:04

So

00:56:06 --> 00:56:09

this isn't really abrogation, it's not a total nullification.

00:56:11 --> 00:56:15

It's a different way of explaining the previous AI the refinement of

00:56:15 --> 00:56:16

the AI

00:56:17 --> 00:56:22

so they didn't like the idea of a coffee with total cancellation of

00:56:26 --> 00:56:29

the episode I will say that definitely does happen. Why was

00:56:31 --> 00:56:32

permitted one point that was made

00:56:37 --> 00:56:39

well, we'll come back next week in Charlotte. There's more questions

00:56:39 --> 00:56:41

about this topic, and then we'll start to see

Share Page