Zakir Naik – Is Religious Fundamentalism A Stumbling Block In The Freedom of Expression – 3 of 6
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses fundamentalists WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp
AI: Summary ©
I know
how,
Mr. Chairman, I learned the press and media better than
I did.
Assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu.
of Almighty God,
the topic
of fundamentalism,
what is the meaning of
a fundamental
doctor?
practice the fundamentals of medicine
and practice.
In short, it should be fundamental in the field of mathematics
and practice
and practice
are fundamentalists
as good,
as bad,
as a fundamentalist doctor,
the fundamentals
are fundamentals
regarding the definition
of fundamental,
fundamental was a movement started in America in the early 20th century by the Americans
again,
and there is no in the Bible
that the law and the faith and the belief of the Bible of God, but not the American protection,
that every word, every word, every letter in the Bible
was the word of God of
the Bible is actually the Word of God.
If a perfect
every word in the Bible is not the word of God, then
regarding
my
fundamental
fundamental principles,
but according to
the fundamentals
of fundamental principles, or doctrines of
the word Islamic nation in the latest edition of
fundamentalist
Islam
that I'm proud and happy to be a part of.
Because I know that the fundamentals of Islam are good.
You're worried
that when you use the word fundamentalist, it's normally
like
the moment
the violence
is against
Islam
submitting
to God
but also
the last time I'd ever pick up the Wi Fi
Maybe given different labels
like
the freedom fighters,
independence,
they will tell you that
they are
suffering through the British government, the fighters,
but according to the
Kaiser vaccine freedom fighters,
you can actually have
by two different groups of people.
So before you live in
an apartment,
you have to first analyze
if you're
gonna do that,
Michael India
freedom fighters
with a view of the Indian, that these people are actually fighting
for the freedom
the same purpose. And
if you mean
by all means I'm
hoping to follow
and happy and drought
fundamentalism a stumbling block in the freedom of expression.
What do you mean?
Before I come to my question, I'd like to put a light on the point
that the fundamentalist
interpretation
and did not agree for
with
the objective
of
Islam.
And Islam also allows the dialogue, it clearly mentioned in the
beginning
return
we can have a common dialogue
with
the first thing
that you cannot make changes.
Regarding the last point
you can make
that
you cannot make any changes in the revelation of God Almighty, I cannot make an opinion in the branch.
But when it comes to Islam,
the Sharia law, the Quran does not mention about the particular problem
does not mention a particular problem you have
if you have to get a loan
it's long Jeopardy for as long as it's not going against the Holy Scripture
regarding
what do you mean by
times
without hurting anyone, without causing any harm to any community? It is not
in the freedom of expression.
Freedom of expression is that
without hesitation, you can abuse anyone.
Anyone out there, Islam, Islamic fundamentalism
as well as
there are various types of
if you say that
I criticize anyone
without any
without any politics.
Then I will take Islam, which fundamentalism is definitely a stumbling block in the freedom of expression
is
equal
to every kind of
capital.
Do not give up
on
either the back and the front continue. Are you willing to have
underground
meaning that
it means you're having the deadly
Because it's
not about anyone without any proof
and eating,
and the doctor can testify
against someone behind the mic
eating the judgment of the candidate.
And also,
they don't pack the
bag by
eating the dead meat.
know some people say that
freedom of
speech
does not harm anyone.
But
the mental torture is much more complex. physical torture is much more long lasting.
I'd like to give an example.
And without any reason, without any
more time.
That's
it for a few minutes. But the mental trauma in front of the company is much larger and much more damage
together.
As
an
example,
I'll do this exercise
called the matrix.
And
let me set the second example of the future started
calling him
and giving him a printed name is much more complex as compared to slapping him
around
sometimes
referred to that is
a wonderful opportunity to
learn
mankind.
I think you want to prove the brand wrong.
Together.
that
hadn't been from anyone that
there would have been.
There have been many contradictions.
The only thing you have to do is take
that same time granted, we'll have to read article 30
dads
do their thing.
I know many of
you find a copy.
Let me tell you the word software does not
it means a person who can see the
project
and have you given the context.
Give an example. Suppose America
and during the budget
the Army General of America
wherever you find Vietnamese
later on, that thing happened
seven years ago.
You find out
the opposite side your
potential you have to defend yourself
in the same fashion that what I mentioned that Ben didn't come to attack you from Brooklyn. You don't fight them.
It is not enough
that you can blame anyone.
Again
provided
some facts
some
government officials working in American government can tell us all the details how the American army
you mind
giving you
all the secrets of the American government
American government
government
in the Indian government
and
that
surely not if you're pulling on driving
record
from the law side
this is not an
example of government officials in America against
the government in America.
I'd like to
dial
in
when Chris
Murphy and Dini for the
for the
purpose and
purpose like
critical
thinking
honey, the computer of luck