Zakir Naik – Is Religious Fundamentalism A Stumbling Block In The Freedom of Expression – 3 of 6

Zakir Naik
AI: Summary © The speaker discusses fundamentalists WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:03 --> 00:00:03

I know

00:00:06 --> 00:00:07

how,

00:00:30 --> 00:00:35

Mr. Chairman, I learned the press and media better than

00:00:37 --> 00:00:37

I did.

00:00:39 --> 00:00:41

Assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu.

00:00:44 --> 00:00:45

of Almighty God,

00:00:48 --> 00:00:48

the topic

00:00:51 --> 00:00:52

of fundamentalism,

00:00:59 --> 00:01:00

what is the meaning of

00:01:02 --> 00:01:03

a fundamental

00:01:09 --> 00:01:10

doctor?

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15

practice the fundamentals of medicine

00:01:22 --> 00:01:22

and practice.

00:01:24 --> 00:01:28

In short, it should be fundamental in the field of mathematics

00:01:35 --> 00:01:36

and practice

00:01:44 --> 00:01:45

and practice

00:01:50 --> 00:01:51

are fundamentalists

00:01:55 --> 00:01:55

as good,

00:01:57 --> 00:01:57

as bad,

00:02:00 --> 00:02:01

as a fundamentalist doctor,

00:02:08 --> 00:02:09

the fundamentals

00:02:10 --> 00:02:11

are fundamentals

00:02:19 --> 00:02:20

regarding the definition

00:02:23 --> 00:02:23

of fundamental,

00:02:24 --> 00:02:33

fundamental was a movement started in America in the early 20th century by the Americans

00:02:35 --> 00:02:35

again,

00:02:38 --> 00:02:41

and there is no in the Bible

00:02:43 --> 00:02:51

that the law and the faith and the belief of the Bible of God, but not the American protection,

00:02:54 --> 00:02:58

that every word, every word, every letter in the Bible

00:02:59 --> 00:03:01

was the word of God of

00:03:04 --> 00:03:06

the Bible is actually the Word of God.

00:03:11 --> 00:03:11

If a perfect

00:03:13 --> 00:03:16

every word in the Bible is not the word of God, then

00:03:19 --> 00:03:20

regarding

00:03:22 --> 00:03:23

my

00:03:30 --> 00:03:31

fundamental

00:03:36 --> 00:03:37

fundamental principles,

00:03:44 --> 00:03:45

but according to

00:03:47 --> 00:03:48

the fundamentals

00:03:52 --> 00:03:55

of fundamental principles, or doctrines of

00:03:58 --> 00:04:01

the word Islamic nation in the latest edition of

00:04:03 --> 00:04:03

fundamentalist

00:04:06 --> 00:04:07

Islam

00:04:08 --> 00:04:11

that I'm proud and happy to be a part of.

00:04:12 --> 00:04:15

Because I know that the fundamentals of Islam are good.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:20

You're worried

00:04:23 --> 00:04:27

that when you use the word fundamentalist, it's normally

00:04:29 --> 00:04:29

like

00:04:32 --> 00:04:32

the moment

00:04:37 --> 00:04:37

the violence

00:04:41 --> 00:04:42

is against

00:04:43 --> 00:04:44

Islam

00:04:47 --> 00:04:47

submitting

00:04:48 --> 00:04:49

to God

00:04:52 --> 00:04:53

but also

00:04:57 --> 00:04:59

the last time I'd ever pick up the Wi Fi

00:05:04 --> 00:05:05

Maybe given different labels

00:05:11 --> 00:05:11

like

00:05:14 --> 00:05:15

the freedom fighters,

00:05:16 --> 00:05:17

independence,

00:05:20 --> 00:05:21

they will tell you that

00:05:22 --> 00:05:22

they are

00:05:24 --> 00:05:29

suffering through the British government, the fighters,

00:05:30 --> 00:05:31

but according to the

00:05:32 --> 00:05:34

Kaiser vaccine freedom fighters,

00:05:38 --> 00:05:39

you can actually have

00:05:40 --> 00:05:42

by two different groups of people.

00:05:43 --> 00:05:44

So before you live in

00:05:46 --> 00:05:47

an apartment,

00:05:49 --> 00:05:51

you have to first analyze

00:05:52 --> 00:05:52

if you're

00:05:53 --> 00:05:55

gonna do that,

00:05:56 --> 00:05:57

Michael India

00:05:59 --> 00:05:59

freedom fighters

00:06:01 --> 00:06:05

with a view of the Indian, that these people are actually fighting

00:06:06 --> 00:06:07

for the freedom

00:06:09 --> 00:06:10

the same purpose. And

00:06:13 --> 00:06:13

if you mean

00:06:16 --> 00:06:17

by all means I'm

00:06:19 --> 00:06:20

hoping to follow

00:06:21 --> 00:06:22

and happy and drought

00:06:29 --> 00:06:32

fundamentalism a stumbling block in the freedom of expression.

00:06:34 --> 00:06:35

What do you mean?

00:06:38 --> 00:06:41

Before I come to my question, I'd like to put a light on the point

00:06:45 --> 00:06:46

that the fundamentalist

00:06:47 --> 00:06:47

interpretation

00:06:48 --> 00:06:49

and did not agree for

00:06:51 --> 00:06:51

with

00:06:54 --> 00:06:55

the objective

00:06:56 --> 00:06:56

of

00:07:00 --> 00:07:00

Islam.

00:07:02 --> 00:07:06

And Islam also allows the dialogue, it clearly mentioned in the

00:07:07 --> 00:07:07

beginning

00:07:16 --> 00:07:17

return

00:07:18 --> 00:07:19

we can have a common dialogue

00:07:22 --> 00:07:22

with

00:07:25 --> 00:07:26

the first thing

00:07:27 --> 00:07:28

that you cannot make changes.

00:07:32 --> 00:07:33

Regarding the last point

00:07:35 --> 00:07:35

you can make

00:07:40 --> 00:07:40

that

00:07:43 --> 00:07:49

you cannot make any changes in the revelation of God Almighty, I cannot make an opinion in the branch.

00:07:50 --> 00:07:52

But when it comes to Islam,

00:07:53 --> 00:07:57

the Sharia law, the Quran does not mention about the particular problem

00:07:58 --> 00:08:00

does not mention a particular problem you have

00:08:01 --> 00:08:04

if you have to get a loan

00:08:07 --> 00:08:11

it's long Jeopardy for as long as it's not going against the Holy Scripture

00:08:13 --> 00:08:13

regarding

00:08:17 --> 00:08:18

what do you mean by

00:08:23 --> 00:08:24

times

00:08:25 --> 00:08:30

without hurting anyone, without causing any harm to any community? It is not

00:08:31 --> 00:08:33

in the freedom of expression.

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37

Freedom of expression is that

00:08:38 --> 00:08:40

without hesitation, you can abuse anyone.

00:08:42 --> 00:08:47

Anyone out there, Islam, Islamic fundamentalism

00:08:48 --> 00:08:49

as well as

00:08:52 --> 00:08:54

there are various types of

00:08:55 --> 00:08:56

if you say that

00:08:58 --> 00:08:59

I criticize anyone

00:09:01 --> 00:09:02

without any

00:09:03 --> 00:09:04

without any politics.

00:09:06 --> 00:09:13

Then I will take Islam, which fundamentalism is definitely a stumbling block in the freedom of expression

00:09:15 --> 00:09:15

is

00:09:21 --> 00:09:21

equal

00:09:23 --> 00:09:24

to every kind of

00:09:29 --> 00:09:29

capital.

00:09:36 --> 00:09:37

Do not give up

00:09:41 --> 00:09:41

on

00:09:43 --> 00:09:48

either the back and the front continue. Are you willing to have

00:09:52 --> 00:09:53

underground

00:09:56 --> 00:09:57

meaning that

00:09:58 --> 00:09:59

it means you're having the deadly

00:10:01 --> 00:10:02

Because it's

00:10:03 --> 00:10:05

not about anyone without any proof

00:10:07 --> 00:10:08

and eating,

00:10:10 --> 00:10:11

and the doctor can testify

00:10:17 --> 00:10:18

against someone behind the mic

00:10:20 --> 00:10:22

eating the judgment of the candidate.

00:10:26 --> 00:10:26

And also,

00:10:28 --> 00:10:29

they don't pack the

00:10:31 --> 00:10:31

bag by

00:10:32 --> 00:10:33

eating the dead meat.

00:10:38 --> 00:10:39

know some people say that

00:10:41 --> 00:10:42

freedom of

00:10:43 --> 00:10:43

speech

00:10:44 --> 00:10:45

does not harm anyone.

00:10:49 --> 00:10:49

But

00:10:51 --> 00:11:00

the mental torture is much more complex. physical torture is much more long lasting.

00:11:01 --> 00:11:02

I'd like to give an example.

00:11:06 --> 00:11:08

And without any reason, without any

00:11:10 --> 00:11:11

more time.

00:11:14 --> 00:11:14

That's

00:11:17 --> 00:11:24

it for a few minutes. But the mental trauma in front of the company is much larger and much more damage

00:11:26 --> 00:11:26

together.

00:11:32 --> 00:11:32

As

00:11:33 --> 00:11:34

an

00:11:35 --> 00:11:35

example,

00:11:39 --> 00:11:40

I'll do this exercise

00:11:41 --> 00:11:42

called the matrix.

00:11:44 --> 00:11:44

And

00:11:46 --> 00:11:50

let me set the second example of the future started

00:11:51 --> 00:11:51

calling him

00:11:53 --> 00:11:59

and giving him a printed name is much more complex as compared to slapping him

00:12:00 --> 00:12:00

around

00:12:07 --> 00:12:07

sometimes

00:12:10 --> 00:12:12

referred to that is

00:12:15 --> 00:12:16

a wonderful opportunity to

00:12:18 --> 00:12:18

learn

00:12:23 --> 00:12:24

mankind.

00:12:28 --> 00:12:30

I think you want to prove the brand wrong.

00:12:43 --> 00:12:44

Together.

00:12:46 --> 00:12:47

that

00:12:49 --> 00:12:50

hadn't been from anyone that

00:12:51 --> 00:12:52

there would have been.

00:12:53 --> 00:12:55

There have been many contradictions.

00:13:00 --> 00:13:03

The only thing you have to do is take

00:13:08 --> 00:13:12

that same time granted, we'll have to read article 30

00:13:20 --> 00:13:21

dads

00:13:24 --> 00:13:25

do their thing.

00:13:41 --> 00:13:42

I know many of

00:13:53 --> 00:13:54

you find a copy.

00:14:01 --> 00:14:04

Let me tell you the word software does not

00:14:05 --> 00:14:07

it means a person who can see the

00:14:09 --> 00:14:10

project

00:14:11 --> 00:14:13

and have you given the context.

00:14:15 --> 00:14:17

Give an example. Suppose America

00:14:19 --> 00:14:20

and during the budget

00:14:23 --> 00:14:25

the Army General of America

00:14:27 --> 00:14:28

wherever you find Vietnamese

00:14:31 --> 00:14:33

later on, that thing happened

00:14:34 --> 00:14:35

seven years ago.

00:14:38 --> 00:14:39

You find out

00:14:46 --> 00:14:47

the opposite side your

00:14:48 --> 00:14:50

potential you have to defend yourself

00:14:51 --> 00:14:58

in the same fashion that what I mentioned that Ben didn't come to attack you from Brooklyn. You don't fight them.

00:15:03 --> 00:15:05

It is not enough

00:15:16 --> 00:15:17

that you can blame anyone.

00:15:21 --> 00:15:22

Again

00:15:23 --> 00:15:23

provided

00:15:25 --> 00:15:26

some facts

00:15:27 --> 00:15:27

some

00:15:31 --> 00:15:37

government officials working in American government can tell us all the details how the American army

00:15:43 --> 00:15:44

you mind

00:15:45 --> 00:15:46

giving you

00:15:50 --> 00:15:51

all the secrets of the American government

00:15:53 --> 00:15:54

American government

00:16:02 --> 00:16:02

government

00:16:03 --> 00:16:04

in the Indian government

00:16:06 --> 00:16:06

and

00:16:08 --> 00:16:08

that

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12

surely not if you're pulling on driving

00:16:22 --> 00:16:23

record

00:16:26 --> 00:16:27

from the law side

00:16:35 --> 00:16:36

this is not an

00:16:37 --> 00:16:41

example of government officials in America against

00:16:42 --> 00:16:43

the government in America.

00:16:57 --> 00:16:58

I'd like to

00:17:00 --> 00:17:01

dial

00:17:02 --> 00:17:02

in

00:17:10 --> 00:17:11

when Chris

00:17:20 --> 00:17:21

Murphy and Dini for the

00:17:23 --> 00:17:24

for the

00:17:28 --> 00:17:29

purpose and

00:17:34 --> 00:17:34

purpose like

00:17:36 --> 00:17:37

critical

00:17:39 --> 00:17:40

thinking

00:17:43 --> 00:17:46

honey, the computer of luck

Share Page

Related Episodes