Suhaib Webb – Usul alFiqh Lesson Eleven The Divisions of Words & Their Meanings

Suhaib Webb
AI: Summary ©
The importance of evaluating research on the science of war is highlighted in the first book of al Qaed Airkarm, which is divided into different sections including the use of phrases and sections of speech. proper speech is defined based on its merits, and the speakers emphasize the need for clear understanding of impossible situations and the importance of obtaining information, including the use of Qasam and the division of speech. The speakers also mention a doctor's name and difficulty in determining if a person is likely to be true or false based on their language.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:13 --> 00:00:15

Welcome back now to our

00:00:16 --> 00:00:17

brief

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20

journey through an introduction to the science of.

00:00:22 --> 00:00:23

In light of

00:00:24 --> 00:00:27

the really nice beginners text of Warakat of

00:00:27 --> 00:00:28

Imam,

00:00:29 --> 00:00:30

Haramain Juwayni

00:00:31 --> 00:00:34

Before I get started, this part now that

00:00:34 --> 00:00:35

we're about to go through is where most

00:00:35 --> 00:00:37

of the people start to fall off.

00:00:38 --> 00:00:40

And that's unfortunate because this is the part

00:00:40 --> 00:00:42

where you really wanna shoulder on. What what

00:00:43 --> 00:00:44

lies between

00:00:44 --> 00:00:45

achievement

00:00:45 --> 00:00:48

and failure is effort. Right? So ask Allah

00:00:49 --> 00:00:51

to bless us with, you know, kind of

00:00:51 --> 00:00:54

the resilience and and and patience needed,

00:00:54 --> 00:00:56

to go through this important section.

00:00:58 --> 00:00:59

Last time we talked about

00:01:01 --> 00:01:03

right? What are, like, the table of contents

00:01:03 --> 00:01:04

of

00:01:04 --> 00:01:07

what are the areas of interest of?

00:01:08 --> 00:01:09

And I just wanna make it a little

00:01:09 --> 00:01:11

bit more simple for you, and that is

00:01:11 --> 00:01:14

that, you know, in total, no matter what

00:01:14 --> 00:01:15

text you read in general,

00:01:15 --> 00:01:17

I heard this from doctor Abdul Salam. No

00:01:17 --> 00:01:19

matter what text you read,

00:01:19 --> 00:01:22

you're gonna find these 20 things addressed in

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24

the book of al Zulufikr, whether

00:01:24 --> 00:01:27

they're small text or very large text, whether

00:01:27 --> 00:01:28

it's like an explanation,

00:01:28 --> 00:01:31

a meta explanation, in general, it's gonna orbit

00:01:31 --> 00:01:32

around these 20 issues.

00:01:33 --> 00:01:36

And that's very important when you evaluate, say,

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38

when people talk about things, when people are

00:01:38 --> 00:01:40

giving fatwa, when people are

00:01:41 --> 00:01:43

interpreting text, you can then start to reference

00:01:43 --> 00:01:45

these 20 things as kind of, like,

00:01:46 --> 00:01:47

kind of, you know,

00:01:48 --> 00:01:49

marks that identify

00:01:50 --> 00:01:50

proper

00:01:59 --> 00:02:00

in very little time. In very little time.

00:02:00 --> 00:02:01

In very little

00:02:03 --> 00:02:04

time. In very little time,

00:02:05 --> 00:02:06

so.

00:02:08 --> 00:02:09

The different

00:02:10 --> 00:02:11

subjects that

00:02:12 --> 00:02:14

addresses or what it's made up of, if

00:02:14 --> 00:02:15

you wanna think about it, like, maybe as

00:02:15 --> 00:02:16

ingredients,

00:02:16 --> 00:02:17

are 20.

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20

So so put this in your mind.

00:02:20 --> 00:02:21

It's very important.

00:02:23 --> 00:02:24

The first is

00:02:26 --> 00:02:28

right, the different types of speech,

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31

and from that is a command

00:02:31 --> 00:02:32

or prohibition,

00:02:33 --> 00:02:34

a universal,

00:02:35 --> 00:02:36

a restrictor,

00:02:37 --> 00:02:39

an ambiguous text,

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41

what clarifies an ambiguous text,

00:02:43 --> 00:02:45

the explicit interpretation

00:02:46 --> 00:02:47

or the implicit interpretation,

00:02:49 --> 00:02:50

a general text,

00:02:52 --> 00:02:53

the actions of the prophet

00:02:56 --> 00:02:57

What is abrogated

00:02:57 --> 00:02:59

and then the abrogator,

00:03:00 --> 00:03:01

al ijma,

00:03:02 --> 00:03:02

the,

00:03:03 --> 00:03:04

binding consensus.

00:03:05 --> 00:03:08

Then the narrations attributed to the prophet sallallahu

00:03:08 --> 00:03:09

alaihi wa sallam

00:03:09 --> 00:03:12

then it's just had right the origin of

00:03:12 --> 00:03:14

things is it permissible? Is it forbidden? Or

00:03:14 --> 00:03:16

is it something else? We'll talk about in

00:03:16 --> 00:03:17

the future.

00:03:18 --> 00:03:19

And also, analogy,

00:03:21 --> 00:03:23

as well as a restrictive text,

00:03:24 --> 00:03:25

Right?

00:03:26 --> 00:03:28

Then the methodology

00:03:28 --> 00:03:29

of using evidence,

00:03:32 --> 00:03:34

and then the qualities of the

00:03:35 --> 00:03:37

the qualities of the person seeking a.

00:03:39 --> 00:03:40

And then the

00:03:41 --> 00:03:42

conditions of the.

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44

So these twenty things,

00:03:44 --> 00:03:45

right, I'll say

00:03:46 --> 00:03:48

them are going to be what

00:03:48 --> 00:03:49

are the ingredients

00:03:50 --> 00:03:51

of.

00:03:52 --> 00:03:53

So the first

00:04:37 --> 00:04:39

now after talking about that.

00:04:42 --> 00:04:43

He says.

00:04:44 --> 00:04:46

And he and this fat is called fa'ul

00:04:46 --> 00:04:47

fasaha.

00:04:47 --> 00:04:49

Meaning earlier when he said,

00:04:49 --> 00:04:51

maybe someone asked,

00:04:53 --> 00:04:55

so you bring this fa into mean like

00:04:55 --> 00:04:57

what I meant by is

00:04:58 --> 00:04:58

this.

00:05:16 --> 00:05:17

Sheikhi says,

00:05:19 --> 00:05:21

as for the different parts of speech,

00:05:21 --> 00:05:25

then the smallest form of proper speech that

00:05:25 --> 00:05:27

you can find is going to be made

00:05:27 --> 00:05:28

up

00:05:28 --> 00:05:29

of

00:05:29 --> 00:05:30

2 nouns

00:05:31 --> 00:05:33

for example he says

00:05:33 --> 00:05:34

Allahu

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54

second is like a

00:05:55 --> 00:05:56

a noun and a verb.

00:05:56 --> 00:05:57

Example,

00:06:10 --> 00:06:10

So

00:06:12 --> 00:06:12

Omar

00:06:14 --> 00:06:15

Kam

00:06:16 --> 00:06:17

Haf

00:06:36 --> 00:06:36

No.

00:06:40 --> 00:06:41

Then he says

00:06:59 --> 00:07:01

This is very important, actually, especially in in

00:07:01 --> 00:07:04

rhetoric. We're gonna learn this in the future.

00:07:04 --> 00:07:06

We have a class at Swiss on rhetoric,

00:07:06 --> 00:07:08

and we plan to post it here on

00:07:08 --> 00:07:09

YouTube also.

00:07:11 --> 00:07:13

Says also speech,

00:07:14 --> 00:07:15

proper speech,

00:07:18 --> 00:07:20

is is, you know, divided,

00:07:23 --> 00:07:24

to commands and prohibitions.

00:07:26 --> 00:07:27

And a

00:07:27 --> 00:07:30

is a phrase which could be truthful or

00:07:30 --> 00:07:31

untruthful.

00:07:33 --> 00:07:34

Wastighbarstighbar

00:07:35 --> 00:07:37

means to ask a question. Right? Interrogative

00:07:38 --> 00:07:39

usage.

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42

So let's break this down quickly. It says,

00:07:53 --> 00:07:54

is divided

00:07:54 --> 00:07:56

in a different way, from a different perspective,

00:07:56 --> 00:07:57

ila amri,

00:07:58 --> 00:07:59

to a command. Then he defines,

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

sheikh almhani

00:08:03 --> 00:08:03

Shefei.

00:08:03 --> 00:08:06

He defines it according to its linguistic meaning.

00:08:06 --> 00:08:08

This definition now is not

00:08:09 --> 00:08:11

the definition given by some of the there's

00:08:11 --> 00:08:14

about 8 different opinions about Amr and Nahi

00:08:14 --> 00:08:15

according to them.

00:08:20 --> 00:08:22

So sheikh, he says,

00:08:22 --> 00:08:23

the ex you know,

00:08:24 --> 00:08:25

is explaining

00:08:25 --> 00:08:26

what a says

00:08:26 --> 00:08:29

that an amr is what signifies

00:08:29 --> 00:08:30

the request

00:08:31 --> 00:08:32

to do an action.

00:08:33 --> 00:08:36

Of course, this is the linguistic definition, like

00:08:37 --> 00:08:37

stand,

00:08:37 --> 00:08:38

speak,

00:08:51 --> 00:08:52

He says

00:08:53 --> 00:08:54

is what

00:08:55 --> 00:08:55

signifies

00:08:57 --> 00:08:59

that the request that you abandon

00:09:06 --> 00:09:08

action. Don't stand, don't say,

00:09:08 --> 00:09:09

don't eat.

00:09:10 --> 00:09:11

And this is important.

00:09:16 --> 00:09:18

And this is going to come up a

00:09:18 --> 00:09:19

lot in and

00:09:19 --> 00:09:20

a lot in theology

00:09:21 --> 00:09:23

and will be enhanced more by the science

00:09:23 --> 00:09:24

of rhetoric.

00:09:32 --> 00:09:33

If I say to you,

00:09:36 --> 00:09:38

you can tell me that's true or not

00:09:38 --> 00:09:38

true. That's

00:09:46 --> 00:09:47

Right. So this is

00:09:50 --> 00:09:52

and you look around. They they ain't here.

00:09:52 --> 00:09:53

So then you could tell me this is

00:09:53 --> 00:09:54

not true.

00:09:55 --> 00:09:56

Then you see

00:10:09 --> 00:10:10

at. Well, subhanallah,

00:10:11 --> 00:10:13

you can see here the of, of doctor

00:10:16 --> 00:10:18

great Maliki, Fakih, and Usuli,

00:10:19 --> 00:10:21

who we read the 2 years ago.

00:10:22 --> 00:10:24

He told me that I prefer instead of

00:10:24 --> 00:10:25

saying

00:10:26 --> 00:10:27

what

00:10:29 --> 00:10:29

could be

00:10:30 --> 00:10:31

true or false is

00:10:34 --> 00:10:37

so that implies responsibility is on the recipient

00:10:37 --> 00:10:38

of the information

00:10:38 --> 00:10:39

so places like

00:10:40 --> 00:10:42

responsibility on us to affirm.

00:10:50 --> 00:10:52

Right. You you have to

00:10:53 --> 00:10:53

do this yourself.

00:10:58 --> 00:11:01

So I appreciate his his kind of genius

00:11:01 --> 00:11:02

here. Right?

00:11:18 --> 00:11:20

So if I said they came, you could

00:11:20 --> 00:11:22

tell me yes or no. But if I

00:11:22 --> 00:11:23

say,

00:11:23 --> 00:11:25

did he come? This is Istighbar.

00:11:26 --> 00:11:26

I'm seeking

00:11:29 --> 00:11:30

That's why it's called Istighbar,

00:11:30 --> 00:11:31

like Istighfar.

00:11:32 --> 00:11:33

The same form, Istighara.

00:11:34 --> 00:11:36

Right? People think Istighara means to pray and

00:11:36 --> 00:11:37

just sit and wait.

00:11:41 --> 00:11:42

So you have to put in work. So

00:11:42 --> 00:11:43

here is means

00:11:44 --> 00:11:47

I'm asking you because I'm seeking the information.

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50

So he says

00:11:58 --> 00:11:59

then.

00:12:00 --> 00:12:01

So now.

00:12:04 --> 00:12:05

We took

00:12:06 --> 00:12:08

right including the one in front of us

00:12:08 --> 00:12:09

now from

00:12:09 --> 00:12:11

the explanation of the

00:12:12 --> 00:12:13

in other books, it's gonna get bigger, bigger,

00:12:13 --> 00:12:15

bigger, but these are the foundational ones. So

00:12:15 --> 00:12:17

the first is is some

00:12:19 --> 00:12:20

like you took if you studied

00:12:20 --> 00:12:21

or or

00:12:23 --> 00:12:24

and then like

00:12:28 --> 00:12:30

Right? What are what is this, like, the

00:12:30 --> 00:12:34

the the the the smallest form of proper

00:12:34 --> 00:12:35

speech that you can bring?

00:12:36 --> 00:12:37

And then we went into

00:12:39 --> 00:12:39

and

00:12:41 --> 00:12:42

and then we went into

00:12:43 --> 00:12:45

and so there's 3 and now the 4th.

00:12:50 --> 00:12:51

Means a false hope.

00:13:04 --> 00:13:04

So

00:13:05 --> 00:13:08

is that I'm seeking something which is impossible

00:13:08 --> 00:13:09

or extremely difficult.

00:13:10 --> 00:13:10

You

00:13:14 --> 00:13:15

know, the famous poem.

00:13:18 --> 00:13:20

You know, I wish I could go back

00:13:20 --> 00:13:22

to when I was young so I could

00:13:22 --> 00:13:24

tell the young people what happened when when

00:13:24 --> 00:13:25

when you become old.

00:14:01 --> 00:14:02

The the second is someone

00:14:03 --> 00:14:05

who is possible but it's very difficult.

00:14:06 --> 00:14:08

So he said somebody that has no hope.

00:14:08 --> 00:14:10

Right? They have no means of doing anything.

00:14:10 --> 00:14:11

They said like

00:14:12 --> 00:14:13

like, I wish I had money.

00:14:15 --> 00:14:15

So

00:14:16 --> 00:14:17

I could make Hajj.

00:14:20 --> 00:14:21

It says something here.

00:14:45 --> 00:14:48

Sheikh, he says that tamanni cannot be in

00:14:48 --> 00:14:49

something which is wajib, and if you read

00:14:49 --> 00:14:50

this, you may think,

00:14:53 --> 00:14:56

he means something that happens, like, all the

00:14:56 --> 00:14:57

time. Like, you know,

00:14:57 --> 00:14:59

uh-uh, if you said, for example, he gives

00:14:59 --> 00:15:00

example,

00:15:01 --> 00:15:03

I wish like tomorrow came now.

00:15:13 --> 00:15:15

So he said that the this is not

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17

generally is not considered allowed. This is a

00:15:17 --> 00:15:18

side discussion, but it's kind of cool.

00:15:29 --> 00:15:31

In here, I said before how the scholars

00:15:31 --> 00:15:33

of how sometimes they surpass the scholars of

00:15:33 --> 00:15:36

language. Here's example. Right? He says that a

00:15:37 --> 00:15:39

can happen in things which are impossible, not

00:15:39 --> 00:15:40

gonna happen,

00:15:40 --> 00:15:43

or things that may happen, but there is

00:15:43 --> 00:15:45

a in them. So what have we taken

00:15:45 --> 00:15:47

so far? Now we took the the smallest

00:15:47 --> 00:15:48

construction of Kalam,

00:15:49 --> 00:15:51

then we took Amr and Nahi, and then

00:15:51 --> 00:15:53

we took Khabar and Istihbar, and now we

00:15:53 --> 00:15:56

took Tamani, and we said Tamani applies to.

00:15:57 --> 00:15:59

Also, what could happen also?

00:15:59 --> 00:16:00

Then Sheikh says,

00:16:01 --> 00:16:02

what I'll do with

00:16:03 --> 00:16:04

don't say.

00:16:05 --> 00:16:06

What

00:16:09 --> 00:16:10

is? Is the fair.

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12

So out of out of this, the thing

00:16:12 --> 00:16:13

that's presented.

00:16:14 --> 00:16:16

The Sheikh, we all well, I don't

00:16:17 --> 00:16:18

well, Imam

00:16:29 --> 00:16:31

like, will you not, like, reside with us

00:16:31 --> 00:16:32

or come stay with us?

00:16:34 --> 00:16:36

Will you not visit us? Right? This

00:16:36 --> 00:16:38

is out. So I'm, like, trying to, like,

00:16:38 --> 00:16:39

win you

00:16:42 --> 00:16:42

over,

00:17:01 --> 00:17:02

the second

00:17:02 --> 00:17:05

or the next type of speech is Qasam,

00:17:05 --> 00:17:05

which means an

00:17:07 --> 00:17:08

oath

00:17:09 --> 00:17:11

So I wanna stop here because it's a

00:17:11 --> 00:17:12

lot to take,

00:17:13 --> 00:17:14

but I wanna review cooking what we took.

00:17:14 --> 00:17:15

So we talked about.

00:17:19 --> 00:17:21

20 different kind of issues that it addresses.

00:17:22 --> 00:17:24

And then the first one is.

00:17:27 --> 00:17:29

He begins to talk about it. So he

00:17:29 --> 00:17:29

says.

00:17:35 --> 00:17:36

Right?

00:17:49 --> 00:17:51

So here's part 2. So the first is

00:17:51 --> 00:17:53

like the smallest form of a sentence. Why?

00:17:53 --> 00:17:54

Because sometimes they order

00:17:54 --> 00:17:56

the order is only one word.

00:18:01 --> 00:18:02

He says.

00:18:04 --> 00:18:06

In order right because the order is gonna

00:18:06 --> 00:18:08

play out importantly in also if you look,

00:18:08 --> 00:18:09

it's only one word like an is

00:18:10 --> 00:18:11

is is stuck in.

00:18:13 --> 00:18:14

So he says

00:18:18 --> 00:18:19

So he says then the second

00:18:20 --> 00:18:20

type of,

00:18:21 --> 00:18:21

you know,

00:18:22 --> 00:18:23

division of is

00:18:25 --> 00:18:27

orders, prohibitions. Obviously, it's gonna be very important

00:18:27 --> 00:18:29

and also how do you know something is

00:18:29 --> 00:18:30

a order? How do you know something is

00:18:30 --> 00:18:32

a prohibition? Is it haram? Is it fard?

00:18:32 --> 00:18:33

Is it makru?

00:18:34 --> 00:18:35

Is it sunnah?

00:18:36 --> 00:18:38

Well, khar khar is something which can contain

00:18:38 --> 00:18:39

truth or falsehood.

00:18:40 --> 00:18:40

Very important.

00:18:43 --> 00:18:44

Seeking information.

00:18:46 --> 00:18:47

Here's the third

00:18:53 --> 00:18:54

right?

00:18:58 --> 00:18:59

It's not gonna happen.

00:19:11 --> 00:19:13

And then he moves on to the next,

00:19:13 --> 00:19:14

the 4th,

00:19:14 --> 00:19:15

he says,

00:19:22 --> 00:19:22

right,

00:19:39 --> 00:19:40

And the imam

00:19:41 --> 00:19:42

says, and this is the 4th,

00:19:44 --> 00:19:44

division

00:19:45 --> 00:19:47

of speech is that it can be divided

00:19:47 --> 00:19:49

into the literal and the figurative, and that's

00:19:49 --> 00:19:52

going to demand its own separate.

00:19:53 --> 00:19:54

We ask

00:19:55 --> 00:19:55

in

00:19:56 --> 00:19:57

US in US

Share Page