Zakir Naik – The Qur’an and the Bible in the Light of Science – vs Dr William Campbell #5

Zakir Naik
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss various scientific and cultural concepts related to the Bible, including the presence of water in the universe and the belief that humans can speak to God through the eye. They also discuss the holy spirit's connection to the holy spirit of God and its importance in bringing up false facts. The discussion also touches on the use of poison in major religion and the potential for false accusations. The speakers briefly touch on the topic of COVID-19 and the use of science as a scientific test. They also discuss the history of Islam and the use of words like "any" and "any thing in the Bible" to describe behavior.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:13
			Thank you Dr. Campbell, Dr. Zakir Naik, for your presentations as well as the response. Lastly, we
have the audience participation session, namely the question and answer session
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:26
			to extract maximum benefit in the limited time of 60 minutes approximately that we have available,
we would like the following rules to be observed.
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:36
			Your question should be only on the topic, the Quran and the Bible in the light of the subject of
science
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:41
			questions out of the topic would not be entertained.
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:46
			Kindly state your question briefly and to the point.
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:53
			This is not a lecture time, neither a counter Question Time for the questioners
		
00:00:54 --> 00:01:04
			Dr. William Campbell and Dr. Zakir Naik should answer comprehensibly and each answer should not
exceed five minutes.
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:10
			Four mics have been provided in the auditorium for the questions from the mics
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:19
			to next to the stage for the gents and two in the rare of the center aisles for the ladies.
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:58
			Those who would like to put forward a question to Dr. William Campbell may kindly queue up behind
the mics on my left Jensen the front ladies in the rare and those who would like to put forward a
question to Dr. Zakir may kindly line up behind the mics on my right, gents in the front, and the
ladies in the red. I would like the audience in the balcony. To kindly Excuse us. We are happy that
this is a full session jam packed Hall. But we request you to kindly take the trouble to come down
to the mics if you'd like to put forward a question.
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:02
			Only one question at a time may be put forward.
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:22
			If you have a second question you'd have to line up behind. Again to put forward a second question.
written questions on index cards available from the volunteers in the aisles would be given
secondary preference. After the questions on the mics are handled by the speakers.
		
00:02:23 --> 00:03:11
			Please write on the card to whom your question is addressed Dr. William Campbell or Dr. Zakir Naik
so that they can be put in the appropriate boxes in front of you transparent boxes with the names
Dr. William Campbell and Dr. Zakir and I put on them so that the questions could be shaken up by the
coordinators and the speakers themselves could select the questions at random. These would be
screened by the panel of the speakers to see that they are relevant and on the topic and okayed by
the coordinators to be put forward on the coordinators mic with the speakers would have to answer.
Kindly state your name and profession before putting forward your question. We will allow one
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:26
			question at a time in a zigzag fashion alternately addressed to each speaker. So first question next
to the stage. Second question next to the stage. Third question on my left in the rare fourth
question in the rear on my right, and so on.
		
00:03:28 --> 00:04:21
			We would allow approximately 40 minutes for these questions. Then we switch over to the questions on
the slips, maybe have the first question from the mic on my left for Dr. William Campbell. I would
like to ask Dr. Campbell in Genesis. It says when it talks about the flood, Noah flood, it talks
about that the water covered the surface of the earth, all the creations and all the mountains and
everything. And it says that it covers the highest mountain of on earth. And that was 15 cubits
which is an Arabic 15 foot you know garden. So we know scientifically that the highest mountain on
earth is not 15 foot You know, it is a lot higher than that. So how come the in Genesis it says that
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:27
			the water covered everything. Every single mountain in earth and the highest was 15 foot.
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:38
			Thank you for your question. I think it's saying that that is above the highest mountain.
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:45
			If the highest mountain is 3000 meters, well then the highest that it's 15 feet over 15 foots above
it.
		
00:04:49 --> 00:04:49
			However,
		
00:04:51 --> 00:05:00
			brother will not allow any questions in between no contact questions please let the questioner put
his question full stop. Then the speaker gives his answer in what
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:23
			The manner he chooses, thank you. And I looked into this in the car in the car, and I think it
actually would be understood to be the same way because it says in Surah 11, verse 40, the fountains
of the earth gushed forth, and the waves like mountains. And then it says that in, in the places
where it gives a list of prophets, there's no prophet before Noah.
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:33
			And so if the I know Adam can be a prophet, but I'm so Noah as is listed, and I think that it says
in the car and to that the whole world was covered.
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:39
			Yes, brother.
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:51
			The question for Dr. Zucker. Nice. Dr. rocker, you said that there is a mistake Excuse me, excuse
me. The second question would come from the mic on my right for Dr. Zakir.
		
00:05:53 --> 00:06:01
			Okay, um, you said that Allah reflects light. And, um, he's made a No,
		
00:06:02 --> 00:06:03
			I didn't really understand that.
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:52
			That was the question he didn't understand my explanation to the counter argument of the William
Campbell regarding * and Allah. The Quran says in Surah, Chapter 24 was modified, that Allah is
numerous amavasya Allah is the light of the heavens and the earth is the light, the meaning of light
in the Quran, it is the fact of life about our life. So he's asking, does it mean that even Allah
has got borrowed light? So the answer is given further, if you read in the verse, it says that it's
like a parable of a niche in the niche there is a lamp, lamp or the light of its own. That means
Allah has light of its own, as well as that light of its own is also being reflected. The light of
		
00:06:52 --> 00:07:11
			Allah subhanaw taala is again being reflected by Allah subhanaw taala himself, like a halogen lamp
that you see here, it has a tube in between the lamp, you can refer to that as Raja Raja dia, and
the reflector, as money or new borrowed light or reflection of light.
		
00:07:12 --> 00:07:50
			And furthermore, but natural this light actually doesn't refer to the physical light or talking
about it is a spiritual act of Allah subhanaw taala. But as an answer I've given to, not to William
Campbell. And since I've got five minutes, I would like to utilize it. For William Campbell. You
have a reply to numerous alum, I am a person who the concardis approach with the Bible and conflict
approach with the Quran was both with 100 Allah grounded positivist and even if I agree with Dr.
William Campbell, and I agree with him, it is right that it was 15 feet above the highest mountain.
But it's mentioned in Genesis chapter number seven was from 19 and 20, that the full world was
		
00:07:50 --> 00:08:38
			submerged underwater. And furthermore, archaeological evidence shows today and the time of Noah's
time, if you calculate by genealogy, it comes to in the 21st to 22nd century BC. Archaeological
evidence shows today that the third dynasty of Babylon and dynasty of Egypt were present at the 21st
and 22nd century BC, and there was no evidence of flood and remain uninterrupted. Therefore,
critical evidence shows that it's impossible that the Earth was submerged the full Earth was
submerged underwater in the 21st 22nd century BC. What about the Quran? What about the Quran? Why
number one, Quran does not give a date by the 21st century BC, or 15th century BC noted point number
		
00:08:38 --> 00:09:21
			two, nowhere does the Quran say the full world was submerged underwater. It speaks about dualism and
its form and its people. A small group of people or maybe a large group of people, archaeological
evidences till today and archaeology they say that we have no objection it's possible that parts of
the world was submerged underwater, but full world it's not possible. So hamdulillah the Quran is
matching with the latest discovering archaeology, but the Bible does not. Furthermore, if you read
Genesis chapter number six, verse number 1516. It speaks about Almighty God telling you Allah salam,
that build an app and it gives the length 300 cubic feet in length, 50 cubits and breadth and height
		
00:09:21 --> 00:09:59
			at the qubit qubit is one and a half feet, the brother made a mistake in one and a half feet. And a
New International Version it says 450 feet in length, and 75 feet in breath. And approximately 45
feet in height. It's up to you but in height. If you measure this have done the calculation, it
comes to less than 150,000 cubic feet in volume and area wise 33,750 and the Bible says there were
three flows round flow first story second story, so multiply by three you get an answer of 101,250
square feet. That is area. Imagine
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:13
			pair of all the species of the world was accommodated in 101,250 square feet. Imagine Is it possible
millions of species out there in the world? If I tell him this auditorium
		
00:10:14 --> 00:10:17
			1 million people came in this auditorium Will you believe?
		
00:10:18 --> 00:10:19
			I remember.
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:43
			I think last year, I had given a talk in Kerala. And there are 1 million people that is the biggest
gathering of salmonella laskaris. 1 million people. I could not see the end. It was not an
auditorium. It was a big beach. I couldn't see anyone. Only few people in the front that's all few
compared to the 1 million people that were there. If you see on the video, gotta realize how big is
1 million, somewhat like arafat, you see two and a half million people
		
00:10:45 --> 00:11:01
			in a area of 101,250 square feet 150,000 cubic feet, it is impossible. And above that they stayed
for 40 days eating going for Call of nature. If 1 million people came in order, will you believe
		
00:11:03 --> 00:11:12
			so scientifically? There are several things in which there are gross scientific errors in the Bible.
Can we have the next question for Dr. Campbell from the mica DeRay.
		
00:11:16 --> 00:11:17
			Dr. Knight?
		
00:11:18 --> 00:11:28
			This question is for Dr. Campbell. Okay, so the next person who'd like to ask a question for Dr.
Campbell. Yes. I'd like to pose this question or other
		
00:11:30 --> 00:11:43
			this test to Dr. William Campbell. Why don't you attempt the falsification test of the Bible given
on the book of Mark, chapter 16, verses 17 and 18.
		
00:11:44 --> 00:11:51
			and prove to the audience here, right now that you are a true Christian believer?
		
00:11:59 --> 00:12:14
			Well, I don't agree with Dr. Mike's interpretation. Gods, Jesus himself was tempted. And the devil
said, Well, if you're the Son of God, throw yourself off the temple. And Jesus said, you will not
tempt the larger guy.
		
00:12:16 --> 00:12:33
			And so if I was to say and say, Oh, yes, I'm going to be sure and do a miracle in front of you. I
would be tempting God. My friend Harry Radcliffe, he had promised to go and so he decided to keep
his promise and trust God to do his well.
		
00:12:34 --> 00:12:37
			It's a different situation. I will not tempt God.
		
00:12:41 --> 00:12:49
			question for Dr. Lightman. Maybe the question in the rare the sister, she's a she's for Dr. Night.
All the time at the back.
		
00:12:51 --> 00:13:14
			Do you have a question for Dr. Night in the back? Ladies? Yes. Okay. My question is just Dr. Zack
and I, the Christians explained the concept of Trinity scientifically, by giving the example of
water which can be in three states solid, liquid and gas in the form of ice, water and vapor.
Similarly, one God is a trait try you and God Father, Son and Holy Ghost, is this explanation
scientifically correct.
		
00:13:15 --> 00:13:17
			Just to come and refer you the answer.
		
00:13:18 --> 00:14:01
			We should not tempt God should not test God. But yeah, we aren't testing God. We are testing the
human being. We should not test God. But here we are testing you and God promises that any believer
who has deadly poison he will not die. He will speak in foreign tongues. We aren't testing God we
know God is correct. He will see to it that every believer can speak we are testing you whether
you're a believer or not. Coming to the question of the sister, that there are Christians who say
that scientifically, we can prove the concept of Trinity like how water can be in three states
solid, liquid and gas like ice water and vapor. So similarly, God is in three forms. Father, Son and
		
00:14:01 --> 00:14:02
			Holy Ghost.
		
00:14:03 --> 00:14:48
			How to reply and is this scientifically correct? scientifically I do agree water can mean three
forms solid, liquid and gas, life, water and vapor. But scientifically we also know that the
component of water remains the same as 202 atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, the components
remain the same. The constituent remains the same, the forms keep on changing, there is no problem.
Let's check with the concept of Trinity. concept of Trinity. Father Son Holy Ghost form is a form
changes. Okay for sake of argument agree, does the component change. God and Holy Ghost is made of
spirit. You made me not made of flesh and bones, then the same. You made me required to eat. God
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:59
			doesn't require to eat to survive and the same and this is certified by Jesus Christ peace be upon
himself in the Gospel of Luke chapter number 24 verse number 36 to 39
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:46
			He says that behold, my hands and feet handed me and see, for a spirit has no flesh and bones. He
says, Behold my hands and feet, handed me and see, for a spirit has no flesh and bone. And he gave
his hand and the saw and they were overjoyed. And he said that Do you have any meat to eat, and they
gave him broiled fish and a piece of honeycomb. And he ate to prove that it was God, to prove that
he was not God. Yet, and the flesh and bones, a spirit has got no flesh and bone. This proves that
it is scientifically not possible that Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, Father jfp, the Holy Ghost is
Almighty God, and the concept of Trinity. The word Trinity
		
00:15:48 --> 00:15:53
			doesn't exist anywhere in the Bible. The word Trinity is not there in the Bible, but it is in the
Quran.
		
00:15:54 --> 00:16:02
			Koran says in Surah Nisa, chapter four was 171, it says wala Taku selasa. Don't say Trinity in the
Hydra calm, this estoppel is better for you.
		
00:16:04 --> 00:16:43
			than it is also the chapter number five was number 17. He says, Look at conferences in a pallu in
the la sala de la they are doing cuff they are blaspheming those who say that Allah is three in
money, the time God, Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, never said he was God. The concept of tree
doesn't exist in the Bible. The only verse which is closest to the concept of Trinity is the first
epistle of john chapter number five, verse number seven, which says four there are three that bear
icon in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one. But if you read
the Revised Standard Version, revised by title scholars, Christian scholars have the highest
		
00:16:43 --> 00:17:22
			eminence backed by 50 different copy denominations. They say this verse of the Bible, first epistle
of john chapter five verse number seven is an interpolation is a concoction is a fabrication, it was
thrown out of the Bible, Jesus Christ peace be upon him never claimed divinity. There is not a
single unequivocal statement. In the complete Bible where Jesus Christ peace be upon says, I am God
already says worship me. In fact, if we read the Bible, it is mentioned in the Gospel of john
chapter number 14 was number 28. He said, My father is greater than I, gospel of john chapter number
10, was number 29. My father has given all Gospel of Matthew chapter number 12, was number 28. I
		
00:17:22 --> 00:17:34
			cast out devils with the Spirit of God, Gospel of Luke chapter 11, verse number 20, with the finger
of God, cast or devil gospel of john, chapter number five, verse number 30. I can have nouns that do
nothing.
		
00:17:40 --> 00:18:04
			I can have my own self do nothing, either your eye judge and my judgment are just for I think, not
my will, but the will of my Father. Anyone who said not my will, but God's will. He's a Muslim.
Muslim means a person who submitted to Almighty God, Jesus Christ is the one who said not my will,
but God will. He was a Muslim, and he was a Hamdulillah, one of the mightiest messenger of God, we
believe.
		
00:18:06 --> 00:18:29
			We believe that he was born miraculously, without any human intervention. We believe he gave that to
the dead with God's permission. We believe that he healed those born lining up with God's
permission. We respected his case peace be upon him as one of the mightiest messenger of God, but he
is not God. And he is not a part of the Trinity. Trinity doesn't exist. Quran says, Allah says Allah
and only
		
00:18:32 --> 00:18:56
			does that before we have the next question from the mic here. Earlier I had announced the lady
should kindly queue up there. Unfortunately, they have not queued up there. So we are having a
problem of balancing the questions. Okay. What we do we disregard the labels on the mic. Yes. If the
ladies want to ask from here, we'll allow them just balance this in practical necessity. The hall is
jam packed. We understand.
		
00:18:57 --> 00:19:03
			We will allow now one question for Dr. Campbell from here.
		
00:19:04 --> 00:19:39
			And the rare mic will be for people who'd like to ask question from the gents for Dr. Zakir.
Similarly for the ladies. The front mic would be for Dr. William Campbell. And the rare mic would be
for Dr. Zakir are the people queued there for Dr. Zakir? Yes, people queued here for Dr. Campbell.
Right. I think they have taken their own positions and change the positions organizers that given we
respect it because of the rush in the hall. When next question for Dr. Campbell from this mic. Thank
you. Yes, brother Assalamu alaykum
		
00:19:40 --> 00:19:47
			hamdulillah tonight's when Praise be to Allah Praise be to the One God of all mankind. Tonight's
been a very interesting dialogue,
		
00:19:48 --> 00:19:50
			in a dialogue yet that
		
00:19:51 --> 00:19:59
			it's talking about a very noble topic for mankind, for all of mankind. And so we have gathered here
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:02
			ment of humanity, question for you.
		
00:20:03 --> 00:20:19
			Okay. The name of Allah. The question is yes. Okay, we've come here together for this event tonight
it should benefit us. And and so I'm asking Dr. Campbell, as a Christian and and with your
colleagues as well. Has this event
		
00:20:20 --> 00:20:24
			done its job, has it opened your heart? Is it has it at least
		
00:20:26 --> 00:20:30
			opened a glimmer towards looking further into the truth of Islam. Thank you.
		
00:20:35 --> 00:20:40
			Well, I think I'll use the last question to answer yours.
		
00:20:47 --> 00:20:50
			Dr. Knight says there's no place that Jesus says he's got
		
00:20:52 --> 00:21:04
			in Mark 1461. He didn't answer. And again, the high priest was questioning him and saying to him,
Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?
		
00:21:05 --> 00:21:08
			In other words, are you the Christ, the Son of God?
		
00:21:09 --> 00:21:15
			And Jesus said, I am. So he did say I'm the son of God. And he did say his divine.
		
00:21:17 --> 00:21:27
			And that the Bible clearly says, I realize he's quoted the verses he wished to quote, Doctor,
doctors, I wish to quote where Jesus was in his human form.
		
00:21:28 --> 00:22:00
			But there's other verses, he says, I and the Father are one. It says, In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and the gut and the guy and God was made flesh and
dwelt among us. In Jesus baptism, the father spoke and said, This is my beloved Son. Jesus was
there, and the Holy Spirit descended, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. We didn't make this
thing up from our heads, just flip this little, little thing. Now, my friend asked the question
here,
		
00:22:01 --> 00:22:16
			we've learned many things. And I'm always willing to learn. But I still think that the 500 witnesses
that saw Jesus after he rose from the dead, have more power with me than Mohammed coming 600 years
later as one witness. Thank you.
		
00:22:21 --> 00:22:42
			will allow a question for Dr. Zaki, from the rare Yes, sister, Dr. Campbell did first attempt to
bring up supposedly false facts pertaining to the chronic views on the universe, and you did refute
these accusations. However, it was not addressed what the Bible says about the shape of the earth
and its other aspects.
		
00:22:46 --> 00:23:01
			Just as a question that I did not address regarding what the Bible says about the shape of the lack
of time, I can point out another 100 points lack of time, any house system wants to know what is the
Bible speak about the shape of the earth. It's mentioned
		
00:23:02 --> 00:23:29
			in the Bible, in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter number four, was number eight. It says, the same
reference with William Campbell is about tempting. The devil took him that gssp upon him to an
exceedingly high mountain, and showed him all the kingdom of the earth, and its glory was part of
Luke chapter number four was number five, the devil took him to a high mountain, and showed him the
glory of all the kingdoms of the world.
		
00:23:30 --> 00:24:09
			Now, even if you go to the tallest mountain, the highest mountain in the world, that's Mount
Everest, and supposedly you have a very good vision, and can see for 1000s of miles together yet,
you will not be able to see all 16 of the world because today we know the earth is spherical, you
will not be able to see the kingdom of the opposite side of the world. The only way you will be see
if the earth was flat, that the description what the Bible gives, the Earth is flat. Furthermore,
the same descriptions repeated in the book of Daniel's chapter number four was the 1011. It says, in
a dream that the tree grew up into the heaven. And then when the tree grew up into the heaven,
		
00:24:10 --> 00:24:23
			it grew up so much, that everyone from all the ends of the earth, they could see the tree. This is
only possible if the shape of the Earth was flat. If a tree is very long, and the shape of the Earth
was flat, it's possible.
		
00:24:24 --> 00:24:38
			Today, it's a universal fact that the world is spherical, you will never be able to see the tree,
however much longer it is from the opposite side of the physical shape of the earth. Furthermore, if
you read, it's mentioned in
		
00:24:39 --> 00:24:59
			the first Chronicles, chapter number 16, was the mentality that the earth does not move. The same is
repeated in the book of Psalms. Step number 93 was the one that Almighty God destabilize the earth.
That means the earth does not move. And in the New International Version, it says that God has
established and stopped the movement of the earth as though one minute
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:03
			There's one minute left, one minute, one minute left.
		
00:25:05 --> 00:25:06
			So they asked me to wait for one minute.
		
00:25:09 --> 00:25:44
			Regarding Dr. William Campbell, he said that Jesus Christ said in the Bible in several places that
he was God, you can refer to my videos I said, concept of God and major religion, which gives all
the references and the answers. I'll only give you the references of what he quoted. And my father
of one is from john chapter number 10, was the machete and In the beginning was the Word is from
john chapter number one was number one. You go to the context, and we'll come to know Jesus Christ
peace be upon never claimed immunity. You can take my cassette, which has ever been the fire outside
concept of God in major religion, and similarities between Islam and Christianity, which gives the
		
00:25:44 --> 00:25:50
			details that Jesus gives peace be upon never claimed divinity time. Thank you. The next question
from the lady in the front for Dr. William.
		
00:25:52 --> 00:26:09
			You mentioned the test where a true believer can drink poison and survive because of their faith.
What about Rasputin, who was poisoned with enough cyanide to kill 16 people? And when that didn't
kill him, he died of blood loss. He was not a good Christian, he had orgies.
		
00:26:10 --> 00:26:15
			How do you explain this where only a good Christian can drink this poison and live How do you
explain that?
		
00:26:18 --> 00:26:34
			Well, I don't feel I have to explain it I made it rescued and wasn't a Christian why what happened
to him has no basis for what happened in the Bible. I said before Jesus God, God didn't intend for
us to line up air and start start taking poison and see whether he's the true God.
		
00:26:36 --> 00:26:36
			Oh, sorry.
		
00:26:39 --> 00:27:08
			It's we're not to touch test God. That was given that these guys that said that these things will
happen. An example would be Paul, he went to when he was in shipwrecked and he I think it's Creek
but I have the wrong place in my mind. And, and he landed, and so he was throwing wood in the fire
and a snake bitten nothing happened to him. But he wasn't trying to test god he was trying to throw
wood in the fire. So different situation.
		
00:27:10 --> 00:27:28
			No comment, please. Thank you. The next question from the rear for Dr. Zakir excuse. Yes, brother.
Excuse me, sir. I just like to say about the circle of the earth. In Isaiah 4022. It says he got
sits enthroned above the circle of the earth. Thank you in the back put up
		
00:27:30 --> 00:27:44
			for Dr. Zakir. Dr. rocker, you said there isn't any mistake in Quran I see more than 20 mistake in
Arabic grammar. And I will tell you some of them.
		
00:27:46 --> 00:27:50
			In Nola, Vina hado wasabi on
		
00:27:53 --> 00:28:03
			in Bukhara. And hatch in the larina Manuel la Vina hado serene, which is a sub or a sub in
		
00:28:04 --> 00:28:23
			Num, num, Brother Brother one question at a time Yeah, but the same thing he said in 63 in vanilla
Heron mistake in the Nila Sahara Can you explain that
		
00:28:26 --> 00:28:28
			and there is more than that.
		
00:28:29 --> 00:28:37
			Brother will allow you only the first part of the question. The second part will not allow because
we have stated will alone time so others get a chance to okay.
		
00:28:38 --> 00:28:47
			The brother has asked a very good question. I would like to be more concardis and again he had
mentioned all 20 grammatical points. And the book is referring to
		
00:28:48 --> 00:28:52
			the correct is the Quran infallible in say something Yeah,
		
00:28:53 --> 00:28:54
			that is good.
		
00:29:02 --> 00:29:11
			I will answer all 20 together because I've read the book. Iran's oil blend inshallah inshallah.
Point number one.
		
00:29:12 --> 00:29:39
			Point number one. Point number one to be noted that all Arabic grammar is taken from the Quran.
Quran was the highest Arabic book, a book which has the maximum level of highest literature. All the
Arabic grammar has been derived from the Quran. Quran is the textbook of grammar. Since Quran is the
textbook of grammar and all the grammars derived from the Quran, the Quran can never have a mistake,
point number one,
		
00:29:41 --> 00:29:42
			point number two.
		
00:29:43 --> 00:29:44
			Point number two.
		
00:29:45 --> 00:29:52
			Point number two. It is like you know taking your ruler and the ruler is they have a measurement and
the measurement is wrong.
		
00:29:54 --> 00:29:57
			It sounds illogical point number two
		
00:29:58 --> 00:29:59
			in the different types of
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:27
			Arabia and you know Arabic and Dr. William camel also agree with me in different Arabic tribes, the
grammar keeps on changing in some Arabic type, the word is feminine, the same word is masculine, the
other tribes of Arabia in different tribes, the grammar keeps on changing, even the gender keeps on
changing. So will you check Quran with that 40 gamma? No. And furthermore, the eloquence of Quran is
so high
		
00:30:28 --> 00:30:55
			is so high, it is far superior. And you know, there are various books on the internet to go well
dramatical mistake 21 grammatical mistake a pill for the 20 grammatical mistake. Do you think that
Christian people to go the mistakes who do these mistakes we wrote about the Muslims, the Muslim
scholars, like the mockery what they did, that the Quran grammar is so high that it goes against the
conventional use of the Arabic
		
00:30:56 --> 00:31:36
			Quran grammar is so high to prove the Quranic grammar was high. They gave examples, and I'll give
you a couple of examples which will answer all these 20 questions. They give the example like
reading the Quran, it says that the people of Luth la salam, they rejected all the messengers. They
detected the messenger that's mentioned today William Campbell said, the people of Noah, the
rejected messengers, we know from history, that there was only one messenger sent to them. So it has
a grammatical mistake. Quran should have said the people rejected the messenger, not messengers. I
agree with you, with Lehmann Vemma. like have you and I know, it may be a mistake. But if you read
		
00:31:36 --> 00:32:03
			the books written by Arabs, what is the beauty of the Quran? The beauty of the Quran is why does the
Quran differ messengers instead of messenger? You know why? Because we know that the basic message
of all the messengers was same, that there is one God about the heat of Allah subhanaw taala by
mentioning the people of Nutella salam, the people of Noah rejected the messenger, it says by
rejecting rucola salam, they are indirectly rejecting all the messengers.
		
00:32:09 --> 00:32:36
			See the beauty see the eloquence hamdulillah. You may think it's a mistake. It's not a mistake.
Similarly, people says that Francis confiar can be and it is, it should be confirmed cannot be and
it was a good pastels is concoction in Arabic, it's not confirmed. But the confocal is more
superior. It says Allah it was it is and can do, past, present and future. Thank you, doctor and I
		
00:32:39 --> 00:33:20
			maybe have the next question from the brother in the front. For Dr. William Campbell. Yes, Dr.
Campbell. This is a very sincere question. To learn a little more about Christianity. I want to ask
that Jesus ministry was only for three years after he was baptized by john the baptist. So Jesus,
the second most powerful person after God, the Son of God, what are his contribution in his early
life from first from one year to say 27 or 28 years? What are his significant contributions? This is
a Excuse me? Dr. Campbell. This is not this is not the topic for tonight. We have we had
		
00:33:21 --> 00:33:55
			Yeah, we can go ahead. In the beginning of the presentation, Dr. Campbell mentioned zilker nine from
the chapter 18 as haoran, the cave, and he mentioned as well, Fernandez, Alexander great, can you
prove me how you came to that level for nannies Alexander the Great. I only read it in the
commentary of Yusuf Ali I but regardless of whether it's Alexander the Great or who it is, the
mother the son doesn't sit doesn't set in a murky White Marsh and that's what if the first says
		
00:33:59 --> 00:34:01
			thank you. Yes, sister. The question for Dr. Zakir.
		
00:34:04 --> 00:34:20
			I don't know the exact verse But when the Bible says For as Jonah was three days and three nights in
the belly of the fish, so shall the Son of man be for three days and three nights the heart of the
earth? Did Jesus peace be upon him scientifically fulfill the sign of Jonah
		
00:34:21 --> 00:34:58
			was the voice of the Bible Gospel of Matthew chapter number 12 was the method and 40 when people ask
Jesus Christ peace be upon him, show me a sign show me American, Jesus Christ peace be upon him says
you even an adult is generation seeking after a sign. No sign shall be given to you but the sign of
Jonah For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so shall the Son of
man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. sign of Jonah, Jesus Christ peace be
upon him, put all his eggs in one basket. And if you go to the sign of Jonah, the book of Jonah is
less than two pages and most of us know
		
00:35:00 --> 00:35:40
			you analyze the Jonah Wall Street isn't three nights, but Jesus Christ peace be upon him. We know
from the Gospels that you have put on the cross the alleys truth fiction alleged my late evening he
was burned out from the course and Princess America. And on Sunday morning if you see the stories
moved away and the park is completely empty, so Jesus Christ peace be upon him is in the tomb on
Friday night. Friday night he was in the tomb Friday night. He was there in Saturday morning, one
day, one night one day, and he was decided tonight. So tonight and Monday, tonight and Sunday
morning the tomb was empty. So Jesus Christ peace be upon was there for two nights and one day, it
		
00:35:40 --> 00:35:55
			for three days and three nights. Not a William Campbell gives a reply in his book that no part of
the day can be counted as one day. And if a patient comes to me who's sick on Saturday night, on
Monday morning, and if asked him how long are you sick for? He said three days?
		
00:35:56 --> 00:36:16
			I agree with you. concardis approach. I agree. I'm very generous. You say part of the day full day.
I agree with you. So Saturday night part of the day Monday, Sunday part of the day full day one
good. Monday part of the day, full day, no problem. If patient says three days, no objection, but no
patient will ever say three days and three nights.
		
00:36:17 --> 00:36:53
			I challenge I've met various patient, I have not come up with a single patient, including Christian
missionary we have ever told to me who was sick in the night and day before yesterday saying I'm
sick for three days in a row. So Jesus Christ, you deserve a three day Jesus Christ is three days
and three nights. So it is a mathematical error scientifically Jesus Christ piece by one didn't
prove. And furthermore, the prophecy says as Jonah was the son of Mandy, Jonah was how how old you
are in the belly of the whale belly of the fish that are alive.
		
00:36:54 --> 00:37:17
			When you're thrown overboard, he was alive. In the belly of the whale. He goes around the ocean dead
alive. Alive. He prays to Almighty God dead alive. Alive, he vomited out on the sea show dead alive.
Alive, alive, alive alive. When as the Christians, how was Jesus Christ peace be upon him in the in
the dead or alive? They tell me dead
		
00:37:18 --> 00:37:45
			alive. Alhamdulillah is a Christian if he's alive, or hamdulillah he was not crucified. If he's
dead. He hasn't fulfilled the sign. You can refer to my video cassette was Jesus Christ really
crucified. It proves that Jesus Christ was not crucified as the Quran says in Surah Nisa chapter
4157 mokulua masala boo, they didn't kill him needed to decrease the time it was only made to
appear. So thank you doctor like Dr. For question for Dr. William.
		
00:37:48 --> 00:38:09
			Dr. Campbell, since you are a medical doctor, could you please explain scientifically the various
medical aspects that are in the Bible regarding because you didn't answer them in your rebuttal. For
example, blood use as a disinfectant bit or water test for adultery, and most importantly, that the
woman is unclean for double the period when she gives birth to a daughter, then as compared to a
son.
		
00:38:22 --> 00:38:29
			Thank you for the question, and I'll get to it. But Dr. Knight keeps getting the questions that
should become to the to the Christian.
		
00:38:33 --> 00:38:53
			It says that on the next day when there was one after the preparation, the chief priests and the
Pharisees gathered together with Pilate, and said, Sir, we remember that when he was still alive,
that deceiver said, After three days, I'm to rise again. Therefore give orders for the grave to be
made secure until the third day.
		
00:38:55 --> 00:38:57
			So they're using these words interchangeably.
		
00:38:58 --> 00:39:37
			As far as I'm concerned, all of these words, the third day, after the third day equal, what happened
with Jesus in the grave. The other thing is, and then there's resurrection. There is one other thing
when Jesus was arrested on Thursday night, please be quiet. This is not going to work like this.
Please be patient Thursday and Wednesday and Thursday after you when he was arrested. He said my
time my hour has come. And so I count that that's three in that three days and three nights. Now
you've asked me about these places in the Bible. I believe the Bible was written by God and I
believe that God put them in there.
		
00:39:40 --> 00:39:46
			So I it's not up to me to explain what God said but I believe that God put those things in his
fiber.
		
00:39:50 --> 00:39:59
			Now we will have the last question on the mic from the brother that the back for Dr. Zakir then we
start the questions on index cards.
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:03
			The last question as per our time limitations, please.
		
00:40:04 --> 00:40:05
			Okay.
		
00:40:06 --> 00:40:27
			Salaam Alaikum. My name is Islam roof and I'm a student studying biology right now. And my teacher
is teaching me evolution now. And I was wondering about the Islamic answer to evolution. Right now,
if you could explain briefly what Islam says, and the topic of evolution and creationism
		
00:40:28 --> 00:40:46
			the brother asked a question the William Campbell is taking the liberty to answer inevitable
liberty. nowhere in the Quran is the name of Alexandra mentioned it says bruker name, not Alexandra,
if some commentators have made a mistake, it's a mistake in the commentary. The men have made the
mistake not the word of God.
		
00:40:47 --> 00:41:00
			Regarding the Bible saying that the world in Isaiah is a circle, no problem. It's a circle, not
spherical. So one plus Bible says flat one period, if you agree with both the verses, it becomes
like a disc.
		
00:41:02 --> 00:41:04
			See, does it look like the earth?
		
00:41:05 --> 00:41:09
			It is circle and a flat. This is not the earth
		
00:41:14 --> 00:41:25
			regarding biology in the Quran, and regarding evolution, two questions about the last I don't know
whether I can answer both or not I don't mind when which one first one or second one biology or
evolution evolution will be the evolution
		
00:41:27 --> 00:41:35
			because he had the question for evolution, I think it'd be good to question biology first and
evolution. If you give me 10 minutes, only in five minutes, whatever you can do.
		
00:41:38 --> 00:42:18
			Okay, fine. I agree with the chairperson, Mr. Samuel no man, an answer on evolution. The exact
answer you can refer to my video cassette Khurana modern science regarding men talk about evolution,
you start thinking about Darwin's theory. And Darwin went on a ship HMS Beagle to island by the name
of Karla Tropez. And he thought birds pecking at niches based on that observation that the beaks of
the birds became long and short, he propounded the natural selection, but he wrote a letter to his
friend, Thomas Thompson in 19th century, he said, that I do not have proof to prove upon my natural
selection, but because it helps me in classification of embryology, of rudimentary organs, I have
		
00:42:18 --> 00:42:53
			put for this, Darwin's theory is not a fact at all. It is only a theory and I made it very clear in
the beginning of my talk, Quran can go against hearings, because theories take turns, but Quran will
not go against any established fact. And in our school, we are taught about Darwin's theory as it's
a fact it's not a fact. There is no scientific proof at all, there are missing links. Therefore, if
someone has to insult a friend, his colleague, he will say, if you are present at Darwin's time,
Darwin's theory would have been proved right. infuriating, he looks like an ape.
		
00:42:54 --> 00:42:56
			There are missing leaves theory
		
00:42:57 --> 00:43:40
			and, and about the four forces that are present the humanoids, the Lucy Australopithecus, which is
guide dominators Neanderthal man CRO Magnon. 40 days refer to my video cassette by molecular
biology, Francis Crick, he said it is impossible that we can be evolved from apes. By DNA coding,
it's impossible. You can refer to my video cassette, it gives the detail some parts I've got no
objection regarding biology, four and 721 verse number 30, that which animals are more equal Russia
in a moon, we have created every living thing from water, we will not then believe today we know
that every living creature, the basic substance, the cell contains cytoplasm, which has about 90%
		
00:43:40 --> 00:43:54
			water. every living creature in the world has approximately 50 90% water. Imagine in the deserts of
Arabia, who could have imagined that everything is made of water. Ron says that 14 years ago, Mike
		
00:43:55 --> 00:43:57
			Andes thank you thank you very much.
		
00:44:01 --> 00:44:24
			We will now start the questions on slips of paper we would have this box for Dr. William Campbell
this box for Dr. Zakir Nye we turn the boxes their names to add themselves so they don't see through
by lol can see. They pick up the questions looking away from the box and they answer it themselves.
Whatever they choose, they have to answer the first question for Dr. William Campbell.
		
00:44:27 --> 00:44:38
			And the next question for Dr. Zaki. They can pick up the questions in advance so that we don't waste
time in the reading the questions. So one one questions we can start and we'll allow Dr. William to
read for some time if you want the first question.
		
00:44:42 --> 00:44:55
			I will read the question but first I just want to say about everything made of water. It's perfectly
obvious every time you smash a bug. It's made of water. Every living thing is made of water but it's
observable. It's not a miracle.
		
00:44:57 --> 00:45:00
			Okay, Dr. Campbell, if you can
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:41
			Answer the contradictions in Genesis regarding the creation. Don't you think that the that proves
that the Bible is unscientific and therefore not from God? I admit that I have some problems with
this. But I also have all the fulfilled prophecies. And that's very important to me. And Jesus, and
it says that Jesus is the cornerstone and built on it. He's built on the foundation of the apostles
and the prophets. And so the apostles the prophets prophesied and the apostles wrote down when God
fulfilled the prophecy. I know that doesn't answer your question, but my faith is in Christ far as
my Savior.
		
00:45:43 --> 00:45:44
			Okay, thank you doctor, like.
		
00:45:48 --> 00:46:29
			Text and translation are two different words, given two different meanings. In the Bible in English,
or text or a translation, can scientifically text and translation we proved to be the one on the
same. Did God reveal his messages upon Moses and Jesus peace be upon upon them in English? It's a
very good question. Can the text and translation be the same? No. A text and translation cannot be
exactly the same can come close to it. And according to Maulana Abdul Majid Daria body said, the
most difficult book in the world to translate is the Glorious Quran. Because the language of the
Quran is so eloquent, it is so superior, so noble, and one word in Arabic has got several meanings.
		
00:46:30 --> 00:47:12
			Therefore two tasks in the Quran is the most difficult, it is not the same. And if there is a
mistake in the translation, it is a human handiwork. The human being was translating he is to blame,
not automatic or regarding what Bible we will in English No. Bible was in English, it's Old
Testament in Hebrew, New Testament in Greek, though Jesus Christ peace be upon him spoke Hebrew, but
the original manuscript that you have, it's in Greek, the Old Testament, the original Hebrew is not
available. Do you know that the Hebrew translation of the Old Testament is from the Greek, so even
though original Old Testament, which is in Hebrew is not present in Hebrew? So you have a double
		
00:47:12 --> 00:47:32
			problem? No one that you have scribal errors etc. But the Quran hamdulillah the original Arabic is
maintained, it has been a hamdulillah scientifically you can prove it is the same. And regarding
word revelations revealed to Jesus Christ peace be upon him, and Moses peace be upon him. I said in
my earlier
		
00:47:33 --> 00:48:08
			talk, that we believe the Quran says in Surah, Chapter 13, verse 38, that Allah subhanaw taala has
said noncentral, Revelation by name only four I mentioned the Torah there's a boo, the angel and the
Quran, the Torah is the vahi, which was given to Moses peace be upon him. The Buddha is Revelation
the vahi, which was given to David peace be upon him ingenious revelation which was given to Jesus
peace be upon him. And Quran is the last and final revelation, which was given to the last and
finally messenger, Prophet Muhammad peace. I am Dr. Knight, thank you so much. The present Bible is
not the Injeel, which we believe in which was given to Jesus Christ. Thank you, sir. Dr. Campbell,
		
00:48:10 --> 00:48:10
			we have one more.
		
00:48:15 --> 00:48:18
			But the present in jail is the one there's always been.
		
00:48:19 --> 00:48:47
			We have, we have texts 75% of the text from 180 ad. That's 100 years after john wrote, it was dead,
he was alive and wrote, you have people alive at that point? Who knew? Who their their their
grandparents believed through john? There's good evidence and good text, the Bible is valid history.
Now the question,
		
00:48:49 --> 00:48:55
			what's the probability you presented? It is a great calculation, thank you. But in the matter of,
		
00:49:01 --> 00:49:14
			of God, it is completely inferior. God is all powerful and can choose who he likes, of course, no
matter rich or poor, or any other thing. So how then does your probability fit in?
		
00:49:17 --> 00:49:33
			Jesus was poor, he was chosen. He said, The Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head. I'm not sure
about this. I don't see how the calculation is talking about that calculation was how many people
could fail to fulfill all those prophecies.
		
00:49:34 --> 00:49:39
			I hope that that's been helpful. Thank you. Thank you, Dr. Knight.
		
00:49:41 --> 00:49:42
			Please, go ahead. Thank you.
		
00:49:45 --> 00:49:59
			To an effort to prove in an effort to prove the Quran is so heavily agreeable to more in science.
What happens if modern science is wrong? Does the Quran always change to reflect the changes in
France? That's a very good question. It's a
		
00:50:00 --> 00:50:40
			Very important question. And we Muslims should be very careful while being compatible with the Quran
modern science. Therefore, I said in the beginning of my talk, I will only be speaking about those
scientific facts that which have been established and a scientific fact which has been established.
For example, they are the spherical, it can never go wrong, established science can never take
turns, but an established science, like hypotheses and theories can take turns, I know Muslim
scholars who have tried to prove Darwin's theory from the Quran nonsense. So therefore, we should
not go overboard and try and prove everything of modern science, you have to be careful to check up
		
00:50:40 --> 00:51:08
			whether they're established or an established, if it's established Alhamdulillah with scientific
proof, the Quran will never have gone against it. If it hypothesis, it may be right, it may be
wrong, like Big Bang Theory. It was hypotheses early, earlier hypothesis today, after a solid proof
about the celestial matter of Stephen Hawking, etc. It's a fact, The Big Bang Theory today the fact
yesterday it was a hypothesis, once it becomes a fact I use it.
		
00:51:09 --> 00:51:47
			You know that a hypothesis saying that human beings have been created from a single pair of jeans,
Adam and Eve. I don't use it. Because Science has established it goes along with the Quran. It goes
along with the Quran that we have been evolved from one pair Adam and Eve peace be upon them, but I
don't use it because that is not an established fact. So therefore, why bringing a correlation
between Quran and science etc. See to it that you use only those scientific facts which have been
established and not hypothesis because Quran a far superior to modern science. I'm not trying to
prove the Quran to be the Word of God with the help of science. No, not at all. What I'm trying to
		
00:51:47 --> 00:52:32
			do for us Muslims, Quran is the ultimate criteria for the atheist. And for the non Muslims. Maybe
science may be the ultimate criteria. What I'm doing, I'm using the criteria the yardstick of the
atheist, and comparing with the yardstick of the Muslim the Quran. I'm not trying to prove the Quran
to be the Word of God with the help of science we're trying to do when I make a compatibility, and I
show the superiority of Quran that what your science has told us yesterday, Quran has told us 400
years ago and trying to prove that our yardstick, the Muslim yardstick, the Quran is far superior to
your yardstick the science, therefore, you should believe in Quran which is far superior for answer
		
00:52:32 --> 00:52:34
			the question. Thank you for
		
00:52:35 --> 00:52:35
			this.
		
00:52:36 --> 00:52:51
			This is the last last two questions for the speakers with as the audience so just bear for us for a
few minutes more. We have the last question on the slip for Dr. Campbell, followed by a one last
question for Dr. Zakir. And we'll ask you to please wait till the end.
		
00:53:05 --> 00:53:08
			It's the same question as the last one, really.
		
00:53:09 --> 00:53:27
			Dr. Campbell agreed to Dr. Night that the errors he showed are not wrong, and that he can't answer
them. So does this mean that Dr. Campbell agrees that the Bible has errors? So it's not the word of
God? There are things in the Bible that I can't explain that I don't have an answer for now.
		
00:53:28 --> 00:53:47
			And I'm willing to wait until I see whether an answer comes. There's many places where
archaeological things have proved that the Bible is true, talking about towns and who was king and
things like that. And I think there's great proof that the Bible is valid in good history.
		
00:53:50 --> 00:53:52
			Thank you, Dr. Campbell. Just one minute.
		
00:53:56 --> 00:54:00
			The question is, are there any more mathematical contradictions?
		
00:54:01 --> 00:54:12
			In the Bible? What is Bible or Islam? Sorry? Are they any more mathematical tradition in Islam? Are
they any more? Is it Bible Islam? I don't know. An answer both.
		
00:54:15 --> 00:54:23
			Why is there any more it should be Bible because of our contradiction. Anyway, regarding Islam, the
Quran says in Surah Nisa, chapter four was the matey to
		
00:54:27 --> 00:54:34
			open casita. Do they not consider the Quran with Kay Had it been from anyone besides Allah? There
have been many contradictions, there is not a single
		
00:54:36 --> 00:54:59
			regarding more contradictions in the Bible, five minutes will be insufficient. Even if they give me
five days. It's difficult. Anyway, I just mentioned a few. It's mentioned in the Second Kings,
chapter number eight, was number 26. It says that his Yeah, that he was 22 years old when he began
to reign. Second Chronicles chapter number 22 verse number two says that
		
00:55:00 --> 00:55:21
			He was 42 years old when he began to reign. Was he 22 years old? Or was he 42 years old man with a
contradiction. Furthermore, in Second Chronicles, chapter number 21, was number 20. It says that
joram, the father of Isaiah, he reigned at the age of 32. And he reigned for eight years. And he
died at the age of 40.
		
00:55:22 --> 00:55:22
			immediately
		
00:55:24 --> 00:55:37
			became the next ruler at the age of 42. father died at the age of 40. Immediately son takes over
who's at the age of 42. How can a son be two years older than the father?
		
00:55:38 --> 00:55:44
			Believe me, even even in Hollywood flame, you will not be able to produce it.
		
00:55:50 --> 00:56:33
			In Hollywood flame, you can produce a unicorn which I mentioned my talk unicorn, you can talk about
ISIS with the Bible speaks about corporate ISIS and, and dragons and serpents. But in Hollywood, you
cannot even show a son be two years older than the Father. It cannot even be a miracle. Even in
miracle, it's not possible. Impossible. In miracle you can have a person being born of a virgin
birth, but in miracle you can't have a son being older than the father by two years. Further, if you
read it mentioned in the Bible, in Second Samuel, chapter number 24, was the mind that the people
that were involved in the battlefield, it gives a list of the people in Second Samuel, chapter 24,
		
00:56:33 --> 00:56:56
			verse number nine, and it says that people that took part 800,000 of the men of Israel took part and
500,000 of the men of Judah. Same if you see other places, first Chronicles, Chapter 21, verse
number five, it says that 1 million 100,000 people took part in the battlefield from the men of
Israel
		
00:56:57 --> 00:57:23
			and 10,460 men to part of Judah. Was it 800,000 people who took part from the men of Israel, or was
it 1 million 100,000? Was it five lakh people of jurassic park or 10,460, a clear contradiction.
Furthermore, it's mentioned in the Bible in Second Samuel, chapter number six was number 23. That
Michelle,
		
00:57:24 --> 00:57:32
			the daughter of Saul, she had no sons. Second Samuel, chapter 21 was the maid, Michelle, the
daughter of Saul had five sons.
		
00:57:33 --> 00:57:38
			One person says no children, no son or daughter, other place five sons.
		
00:57:40 --> 00:57:40
			Furthermore, if you read,
		
00:57:42 --> 00:58:08
			it's mentioned, and Gospel of Matthew chapter number one, verse number 16. It says, about the
genealogy of Jesus peace be upon him, as well as Luke chapter number three was number 23. And it
says that Jesus his father, that Joseph, his father was Jacob, Matthew chapter one, verse 16, and
Luke chapter three verse number 23. Jesus father, Joseph, his father was Haley did Jesus's father
Joseph had two fathers.
		
00:58:09 --> 00:58:17
			What do you call a person or two fathers? Or was it Haley? Or was it Jacob? Thank you. Thank you
very much.
		
00:58:22 --> 00:58:35
			Can we can we have you bear with us for two minutes. We have the renowned International Islamic
scholar amongst us, Dr. Jamal, by the way and on behalf of the Islamic Research Foundation.
		
00:58:36 --> 00:58:40
			We feel it an honor if he would take
		
00:58:41 --> 00:58:54
			the pleasure of integrating or releasing the book just written by Dr. Zakir Nye the Quran and modern
science compatible or incompatible.
		
00:58:56 --> 00:58:58
			Dr. Jamal, by the way to
		
00:58:59 --> 00:59:00
			release the book,
		
00:59:01 --> 00:59:19
			which has just recently been published and printed a few days back as being released here in Chicago
on this appropriate occasion. No more fitting way as a gesture of friendship than to ask Dr. Decker,
to give it to Dr. Campbell by himself.
		
00:59:40 --> 00:59:59
			As we have a very limited number of these copies available. So we request only the non Muslim guests
who have come here to kindly take a complimentary copy of the book as they leave the auditorium. If
they're interested, it would be a pleasure. May I call upon Dr. Sabine mnth to present the water
thanks
		
01:00:01 --> 01:00:22
			Again, on behalf of Islamic circle of North America, I would really thank all of you for your
patience, and all our distinguished guests over here for giving us a very good performance for all
of us. So Monica lahoma BMD cuando la ilaha illa Anta Vanessa Pharaoh cavanna tabula he assalamu
aleikum wa rahmatullah wa barakato.
		
01:00:55 --> 01:01:02
			fulfill our aims in life, Allah forgive our sins. Yeah.
		
01:01:03 --> 01:01:07
			Oh Allah, the Most Gracious