Zakir Naik – Some Muslims Complain that you Prove Quran is True by Science. Thus the Quran has less status

			The next question is from Muhammad Farooq from Chittagong, Bangladesh. Some of my Muslim Brothers
complain about you that you prove Quran is true by science. As a result, it is understood that Quran
has less status than science and science seems to distinguish between the truth and falsehood. What
is the opinion?
		

			The comment made by the brother that when I try and prove Quran
		

			with the help of science, I'm trying to prove that science is more superior to Quran and that is
totally false. If any of you hear my videocassettes on Quran, modern science, they'll come to know
that I am comparing our yardstick, the ashtec of the Muslim that is the Quran, with the yardstick of
the non Muslim which is science. And I said that Quran is the last and final revelation of Allah
subhanaw taala, which was revealed to the last and final messenger, Prophet Muhammad peace be upon
him.
		

			And in every age, the Quran has proved itself to be the Word of God previously was the age of
miracles and Quran in the miracle of miracles. Then came the age of literature and poetry
Alhamdulillah Muslim and non Muslim Arabic scholars alike, they are claimed the Quran to be the best
Arabic literature available on the face of the earth.
		

			But today is not the age of literature and poetry today is the age of science and technology. And if
you compare Quran, with modern science, you will come to know that Quran is far superior. When I'm
comparing Quran with modern science, I'm telling what science has come to know recently 20 years
back 40 years back 50 years 100 years back, or honors mentioned 14 years ago.
		

			For example, Quran mentions the creation of the universe
		

			in Saudi Arabia, chapter number 21, verse 20, our la mirada, Xena kafu do not the unbeliever fee and
the somewhat evil or the kind of tech Noma that the heavens and the earth are joined together and we
closed the messenger. This is similar to the Big Bang.
		

			And the Big Bang says that our universe was one primary Nebula, there was the secondary separation
of Big Bang, which gave rise to galaxies, the sun, the stars, including a planet Earth. And that's
how the universe came into existence. This was first described in 1973 by a couple of scientists for
which they were Nobel Prize. That is hardly 47 years back 50 years back. Imagine Quran mentioned
1400 years ago, the creation of the universe, the Big Bang, what we came to know 50 years back, the
Quran mentioned 14 years ago. So when I'm comparing the yardstick of the atheist, of the unbeliever,
of the non Muslim that assigns with our yardstick the Quran, I say Koran is not a book of science as
		

			CENZ but it's a book of signs. It's a book of arts.
		

			And there are more than 6000 if not more than 6000 signs in the Glorious Quran, out of which more
than 1000 speak about science. And when we compare we come to know that our yardstick the Glorious
Quran, a far superior so when I'm comparing fans with the Glorious Quran, nowhere do I say that
fancy superior
		

			all what is mentioned in the Quran
		

			14 years back Sanchez comes no recently what I'm trying to prove that our Glorious Quran the last
and final revelation of Allah subhanho wa Taala, which was revealed to the last and final messenger
Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is the ultimate book.
		

			It is far superior than modern science. So if you hear my lecture
		

			correctly, and with attention, you will come to know I'm uplifting the state of those of Iran far
superior to the State of the Science in no way. Am I saying that science is more superior than the
Quran and music they are tick signed with our yardstick the Quran and Quran are hamdulillah excels
and proves it is superior to science for them. So the question