Nouman Ali Khan – Joseph in the Qur’an and the Bible #2

Nouman Ali Khan

Joseph in the Qur’an 12_1-18), A comparative look at the Bible, Part 2

Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The conversation covers various topics related to the holy spirit and its influence on behavior, including popular titles like Joseph Campbell and Jacob. The discussion touches on language used in court proceedings, political events, and cultural topics like the origin of the Midianites and the use of "median licenses." The transcript is not a conversation or monologue, it is a series of sentences that describe a situation or situation that took place decades ago.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:06 --> 00:00:09
			Okay, here we are back again and hamdulillah
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:13
			salaam aleikum wa rahmatullah wa barakato. Everybody. Can you hear me?
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:20
			Yes, I can. Okay, excellent. I'm glad you jumped in just at the right time. I wanted to start off
today
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:47
			with a thought I had I've been thinking about our conversation since yesterday, and of course,
inshallah we'll have to read on from where we left off my guests again, if you guys don't know the
socket, socket, person and shift so hips aid and both of them are hamdulillah renowned scholars in
their own field. And the the I won't, I'll skip the bio from last time, but I will just wanted to
get straight to work. The thought I had yesterday when I was reading again, the second Ayah
		
00:00:48 --> 00:01:31
			Gatlin apostolica. Arsenal pazhassi Bhima. ohana ilica has been publicly let me know half a million
and I kind of took posit, let me know half the lien, as opposed to in contempt a couple of years
often, like there's a larger group, you are among those unaware, right, and unawareness has
different degrees. So of course, the Arabs are unaware of the account as the Quran describes it. And
also socialism without revolution is unaware of what lies in the Scripture. But it almost seems to
be now as if Allah saying that those who carry the story with them are also unaware of certain
truths. Like they're also among the unaware, you know, and their own right. And there's an awareness
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:41
			being brought to the story of use of how they set up in a way that even as we're reading in Genesis,
there are things that are going on is saying that the jet that Genesis comes unaware of,
		
00:01:42 --> 00:02:24
			you know, so anyway, that was just, that's really beautiful. Yeah, and it's really interesting to
the ayah. Just before that talks about Koran rbn, which mentioned. And this this story, like I
mentioned last time is hugely popular, but there's no record at all of anything in Arabic before
this story. I said the first time the story is being told in the house. So it's one that it's in
Arabic to that the facts that are being brought out in the story are so uniquely brought out and
are, in a sense, buried away in the previous renditions of the story. And the other I was thinking,
you know, say when we talked about accidental causes and how you can look at causes of Naxos. And
		
00:02:24 --> 00:03:05
			that, you know, and one way of reading that is the best story, the best of all stories, but it can
also be understood as the best of the story, meaning the or even the word so I keep saying best, but
really the most beautiful truths of the story are being brought out, which is also kind of embedded
inside asset classes. And that's, that's becoming more manifest as we go through this read. Yeah, we
were thinking about the IRA, which says, you know, allogeneic, stem Your Honor Code of national
Yeah, yeah, you hear something and you take the best thing from it, the most beneficial meanings,
the most beneficial lessons and things that you will apply, you know, apply to your own
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:07
			action.
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:17
			Okay, just one more. One more thing about offering. It actually comes up later. So we can we can
jump back into later because no, no, tell me no,
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:19
			no, no, I got thirsty.
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:24
			Sorry. I said drop it while it's hot.
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:50
			So it's to do it. It's actually related to the second dream. So maybe we can do the second dream
because it's gonna come up. Okay. Okay, so look, and he said, Look, I dreamed a dream again. And
look, the sun and the moon and 11 stars were boggling to me. And by the way, it stopped me whenever
you could just say start with Don't say like the whole movie, please consider stopping like.
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:54
			Okay, so just to stop, and he recommended.
		
00:03:56 --> 00:03:58
			There's no acid you're on. Okay.
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:04
			So a little cheers between me and you know,
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:10
			the club hasn't joined yet.
		
00:04:14 --> 00:04:38
			So, we sort of left last time on the second dream, right. So I tried to raise this question. The
Quran sort of feeding up this initial part of the story a little bit so it cuts off the cuts out the
introduction altogether. And there's problematic aspects in that anyway, which is maybe why it cuts
them cuts it out. And then you have to dreams if this got the one. And a question that arises in my
mind is
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:49
			the grinds are speeding up the narrative here and simplifying it a bit. But why take this dream
rather than the other dream? raise the question other dream would
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:59
			prime facie would seem to be less theologically problematic, right one, she's bound to another shift
by the way. I misspoke. They're the kind of bundles of
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:02
			Kind of a wheat, whatever, it's not single straws.
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:36
			So, so part of it, I suggested was that it's correcting a rabbinic idea that dreams can have just
partial fulfillment, because the mothers already died. And the Quran serves insists that he read it
off either way he that he raised both of his parents of the other three. So there's another part of
it, which has to do with how Christians were reading the story. So there's, there's a really nice
article that Sharif accom friend recommended to me by hagas, Ellington.
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:44
			petrological, anthropology looks at the the stories in the Quran of the angels bowing to Adam,
		
00:05:45 --> 00:06:16
			and why they would be included in the Koran when potentially the theological problematic from the
point of view of the strict tauheed of the Quran. And what he shows really beautifully, is that, in
fact, if you bear in mind, number one, the audience of the Quran and number two how that story is
being read by the surrounding communities. The story is absolutely and starkly emphasize the reality
of it. So you have the pagan Arabs, for example, who was very clear from the Quran have this cult of
angel worship, right.
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:39
			And what the story is doing is saying, Angel worship makes a sense as the angels who bow to Adam,
and now here you are taking the angels as deities I see. And at the same time, the story is being
read in the Christian tradition as it was a precursor for Christ. And so he's a sort of semi deified
figure,
		
00:06:41 --> 00:07:04
			as kind of a forerunner just to kind of give people a foretaste of one day, a truly deified figure
will come. And just as the angels are bound to Adam, everyone will bow to that actual defied fig
ticker, Jesus. And what's really interesting is that the words that recur in the Syriac stories for
Ireland include his dashboard, so and his good show His Holiness, and his
		
00:07:05 --> 00:07:09
			spear, is this big one. Know sahbihi hum, Zika.
		
00:07:10 --> 00:07:29
			Same story and says that this be, and this is not for Adam, right? It's for God. So the story is
affirming, to heat to the earth by rejecting Angel worship, funding to heat to the Christians by
rejecting that ad, but that is such that had anything to do with a partner.
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:46
			And then finally, the way that you're reading this story, what they're saying this is a prime
example of Adams wisdom, his hotma. And that was important them because the rabbi's one of the names
for themselves is the half I mean, the wise ones through the stages.
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:50
			And they said that what demonstrates his wisdom is that look,
		
00:07:52 --> 00:08:30
			they also had this idea of the angels being present at the start of creation, which isn't in
Genesis, do you find it in most Christian Jew stories? That look, the angels didn't know the names
of these creatures, but Adam, in his wisdom knew, and the Quran takes that away from them, as well
as as, just as the angels didn't know, Adam only knew because God taught him. So you have this like
really interesting, three way kind of message in the Quran at these groups, so if you apply the same
sort of thinking to the Joseph narrative, in the Quran, just as there is this cult of angel worship,
this clearly kind of this ancestral cult, that Croatia, right, kind of almost in a bath of their
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:31
			fathers,
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:37
			that this is not the dinner fathers was not Abba, Anna karateka falloon. Right.
		
00:08:40 --> 00:09:16
			Right. And as far as the pricing thing is saying, just as Look, it makes no sense to worship the
angels, because the angels barter item makes no sense to worship your father's because sometimes the
fathers have to bow to the sons, right, the sons can have something which is superior to what the
fathers came with. So it's, I think, a really powerful way to undermine that kind of message. And
then from the Christian perspective, they were looking at this as a, again, they were looking at
Joseph, just that they looked at Adam and Jonah and several other Old Testament figures, as a
precursor for Christ. So all these figures are really there to kind of teach you that someone's
		
00:09:16 --> 00:09:20
			coming wonder who be truly divine, and the true Savior, not just Savior.
		
00:09:22 --> 00:09:25
			Exactly. all of humanity. And also,
		
00:09:26 --> 00:09:41
			what he really picked up on like everyone picks up on this is the fact that Look, everyone bows down
to him. And that is to let you know that one day you will have to bow down to everyone. And so the
Quran retains the fact they won't bow down to him, but again, again, emphasizes because it gets to
be Cara buka
		
00:09:42 --> 00:09:50
			and Jalla hora de haka. So it affirms the borrowing, but then it kind of continuously emphasizes
that.
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:52
			Yeah.
		
00:09:53 --> 00:09:55
			So I think those are some of the
		
00:09:58 --> 00:10:00
			reasons for eating disorders.
		
00:10:01 --> 00:10:41
			Again, what caught my attention there from Osaka mentioned, among other things was this this because
this issue comes up in the Tafseer to silver Razi right at the end when, when the frustration
happens, he has this long discussion about, you know, how could it be possibly? How can you be
accepted that the senior, the father, who has all the rights of fatherhood go straight to the sun?
and Yahoo being a senior prophet who has done more worship and all these things? How could he do and
then there's a whole bunch of answers expands over several pages, but it just shows you sometimes
that maybe the meaning behind that could be found by making reference to other things, external
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:55
			things, which just shed a different kind of light on it. Right, when it no longer seems so
problematic. But actually, due to this, ah, there's actually had a purpose, which, which is
achieved. And maybe that purpose was achieved for a particular kind of audience.
		
00:10:57 --> 00:11:00
			Who would have got the point or who would have certainly been been struck by the
		
00:11:02 --> 00:11:05
			remarkable Okay, so let's get to the dream then.
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:13
			So he dreams a dream and look at the the sun and the moon 11 star. So the first thing I noticed was
a change in sequence.
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:17
			Right? from the Quran, 11 stars, the sun and the moon.
		
00:11:19 --> 00:11:59
			And the other is he recounted as I read on, and he recounted it to his father and his brothers. And
his father rebuked him, and said to him, what is this dream that you've dreamed? Shall we really
come? I am your mother and your brothers to bow before you to the ground. And his brothers were
jealous of him. And so and this last part I'm a little confused about while his father kept the
thing in mind. Yeah, well, it is. Yeah, there's a few pieces here. Let me recount my questions to
you hear. First, the father's rebuking him, which is obviously contradicting the Crown's narrative,
the Koran is actually, the dad's validating him when he sees the dream, but he recounts the dream.
		
00:12:01 --> 00:12:16
			Second, the Bible, apparently the biblical version is that the mother's has passed. And then you've
got the mother bowing. So how is that making sense from the biblical point of view? And then what
does it mean that the dad kept the thing in mind?
		
00:12:17 --> 00:12:21
			So just you know, just the mother thing, because maybe the easiest.
		
00:12:24 --> 00:12:35
			You know, I like to say the rabbi's and various opinions, maybe the dream didn't get fulfilled,
maybe Rachel, who had passed away, it wasn't his actual mother, maybe it was Nate seven, who was his
actual biological mother.
		
00:12:37 --> 00:13:03
			But modern scholarship tend to think that the Genesis is composed of initially independent stories,
right? They're floating around orally, or maybe in written form, and then brought together by final
editor. And so the part of Rachel dying is an independent tradition, the part of the Joseph stories
are independent Russian, and it was just retained. And that is one of like several inconsistency
that you see across, across detected.
		
00:13:04 --> 00:13:13
			Classically, right, the star Genesis, there's two creation stories, right? chapter one is oppression
stories, Chapter Two is a whole separate creation story. So how about a love for the Quran?
		
00:13:15 --> 00:13:22
			So that's how modern scholarship tends to understand that it's just an inconsistency that arises
from these being independent
		
00:13:24 --> 00:13:26
			traditions that were amalgamated.
		
00:13:28 --> 00:13:46
			So in terms of Yeah, in terms of his father rebuking him, we're keeping him as you see this kind of
tension, right. So as far as rebuking him for this kind of disrespectful dream. Yeah. At the same
time, he's keeping it in mind. He's not completely dismissing it.
		
00:13:47 --> 00:13:56
			And that's, I think, explicable. If you look at the nature of dreams in Genesis, Joseph dream is
really unique.
		
00:13:57 --> 00:14:13
			So Abraham, prior to him, as has dreams with God, and Jacob himself has dreams with God. And then
those are the fairy dreams, if God Himself sort of manifests Himself in some way or another and
communicates to the, to Abraham or to go to Jacob.
		
00:14:14 --> 00:14:24
			Joseph is not having a dream, but he's not seeing God, it's a much more kind of secular dream,
right. So that, for me, is a really,
		
00:14:25 --> 00:14:27
			really important clue as to what is happening in Genesis.
		
00:14:29 --> 00:14:55
			Jacob sort of has the kind of split he knows the power of dreams, but at the same time recognizes
God's men appearance. And this is a strategy that recurs in this story is it's it's a very secular,
patriarchal story in that God is very much in the background only appears occasionally. And that for
me, it's really one of the rarest one of the rarest names of a lot used in the stories. Latif.
		
00:14:56 --> 00:14:57
			Yeah, yeah.
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:15
			There's a contrast between those two attributes in the story that's like if you think of Allah
Israel in the story from the Quran point of view, you know, Allahu Allah when Allah Emery and Latif,
holy Maya are actually the two tensions that weave the entire story together.
		
00:15:16 --> 00:15:44
			And when you said that I was like, Yeah, yeah, that's really it was was really fascinating for me. I
don't know if you remember chef said, we were at that conference together in London biblical
traditions in the Quran. And there was a really nice presentation on third use of by Adam
Silverstein, as an Israeli scholar, and he spoke of this recurring feature in students use of we
have this kind of secular secularization of
		
00:15:46 --> 00:16:28
			a theological language. So Arabica isn't the sort of, but it occurs again and again for something
somewhere other than God, disease occurs in the sort of Vedic culture, someone hasn't got Eileen, a
cousin sooner, but for other than God, but she records but for them, and you've got this list of
2021 things is clearly kind of a motif in the use of where you have religious vocabulary, which is a
repurposed and secularized. And this was really interesting is that Genesis is doing the same thing.
So you have dreams, which we know, as we read through Genesis are a marker of God being involved but
suddenly got missing, right? So that's, I mean, this this really interesting to me for like two main
		
00:16:28 --> 00:16:30
			reasons, I think. So firstly,
		
00:16:32 --> 00:17:07
			the way modern scholarship, academic scholarship tend to look at the Quran is to say, well, we
shouldn't be comparing the Quran to the Bible directly as to anachronistic. That's the only
marginally useful, we should be looking at what how is the Bible being read at the time of the
Quran? Right? So what were the Jews and Christians how they interpreted about and that's really what
the Quran is interpreting with engaging with, and that certainly has its use. But then you get these
really interesting throwbacks like this, where there's something very subtle happening in the Bible,
which is only picked up in modern scholarship. And the Quran is doing something very similar itself,
		
00:17:07 --> 00:17:10
			which is a much more intimate, and which
		
00:17:11 --> 00:17:18
			have Christian tradition, or Jewish tradition that was accessible to the Arabs, but actually a
larger body. Yeah, yeah. Why
		
00:17:19 --> 00:17:33
			that bring it to life is we mentioned earlier, Raphael in the Quran, again, you have this really
unusual use of lawful, right? Because that's not how often ordinary use no Quran, or the ordinary
use of lawful isn't something that you would apply to the Prophet. Right.
		
00:17:35 --> 00:17:59
			So this is part of, I think, a strategy in sort of user for motif, which one should look out for.
But then what's interesting is not only that the Quran is sort of directly picking up on something
that's happening in Genesis and carrying that tradition forward, is what both texts do with that,
then, like, why are they doing that? What's the kind of core purpose and in Genesis, you find that
out right near the end, so I'm gonna leave it there. And
		
00:18:00 --> 00:18:33
			we'll see, I think, why Genesis is doing that. And at that point, also, we can think about why the
garage, like I think, basically, they're going, they're both using the same technique and pulling in
in different directions. But I'm gonna leave it alone. Okay, that's an interesting obscurity that
you left us with. I'm gonna mispronounce this, this geographical location that's mentioned in the
Bible. So you will correct it for me. And his brothers went to graze their father's flock at shfm.
Yeah. Oh, I got it. Right. Okay.
		
00:18:35 --> 00:18:59
			And Israel said to Joseph, you know, your brothers or pasturing, chum, Come, let me send you to
them. And he said to them, here I am. And he said to them, go pray to see how your brothers fare and
how the flock fares and bring me backward. He sent up Okay, go ahead. Go ahead. Yes, as far as just
note, a couple of things. There's obviously a discrepancy with the correct narrative here.
		
00:19:01 --> 00:19:01
			But
		
00:19:02 --> 00:19:03
			there's a cup
		
00:19:05 --> 00:19:07
			I should have mentioned, I mentioned this earlier is about
		
00:19:08 --> 00:19:48
			in the in the Quran. And the brothers are plotting against us before they go out right? before they
go crazy. They're already out there at home, and they want to kill him. And then they have to
convince the father to stand just about with them. Whereas we'll see in the story here in Genesis,
that plot occurs. It's just a more of an instantaneous thing. happenstance. Oh, here he is. Yeah,
what let's just yeah, here's an opportunity. Right and it's pretty remarkable that dad feels so safe
to send use of our to his brothers. Yeah. And you've got from the very beginning don't even tell
them a dream. And
		
00:19:49 --> 00:20:00
			like so we get going out with them don't even have certain conversations with them. Right. So
there's an a polar opposite extra cautionary measures between the child
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:29
			And as brothers and on the other side, there's this overwhelming sense of security, you need to go
out to your brother's way out there. And go bring me back word on your own. Right. Yeah, yeah, it's
really interesting difference. But but but what we do see in the Bible, though, which is perhaps a
forerunner to what we see in the Quran is, although they they're not plotting against him explicitly
at this stage, the language is really suggestive that they have something in mind. So it says his
brother jealous of him, right, the word that can,
		
00:20:31 --> 00:20:37
			is used consistently for jealousy, which is followed by action, which is followed by some kind of
		
00:20:38 --> 00:20:52
			punitive, scheming and punitive action. So as soon as you read it, you know that it's not just going
to be something that they left to leave to simmer, it's going to have some impact on their actions,
and then the fact that they go to shfm. So shfm,
		
00:20:53 --> 00:20:55
			just a few chapters ago, has occurred.
		
00:20:56 --> 00:21:06
			It's the place where Jacob's sons are these the same brothers of Joseph, where they slaughtered the
sons of, of hammer, hammer son, who was also called chef and
		
00:21:08 --> 00:21:22
			raped, Jacob's daughter, Dina, and Jacob sons then basically orchestrated a trap, and they massacred
the entire entire family. So the fact that Shechem is mentioned is, again, kind of suggestive that
		
00:21:23 --> 00:21:31
			not necessarily that you know, they're going there in order to kill just as well. But just as part
of the plot to let you know that something else mergers is afoot.
		
00:21:33 --> 00:21:44
			And then also the fact that he says, Here I am Hindi need that again, you see that recurring in
Genesis when a father is about to lose a son or, or is on the verge of losing a son. So when
		
00:21:45 --> 00:21:46
			Abraham is taking Isaac,
		
00:21:47 --> 00:22:16
			and, you know, it's this time Abraham, Isaac is addressing Abraham, he's saying, where's, you know,
where's the firewood, and he, every time he addresses Abraham, Abraham says, Hey, honey, here I am.
When Isaac is talking to Assad, just before there's a rupture between them, he says, He calls him
and says him any area. So there's several indications that something is about to happen. So although
it's true that the, the plot isn't explicitly mentioned until later,
		
00:22:17 --> 00:22:19
			you can see already that
		
00:22:21 --> 00:22:24
			you know, that there's this kind of murder in the
		
00:22:25 --> 00:22:52
			circle. Remarkable. Okay. So go pray to see your brother, how your brothers fare and how the flock
fares and bring me backward and he sent him from the Valley of Hebron. And he came to shfm. And a
man found him and look, and look, he was wandering in the field, and the man asked him saying, What
is it you seek? And he said, my brothers I seek, tell me pray, where are they pastoring. And the man
said, they have journeyed on from here for I heard them say, Let's go, let us go to doeth end. And I
said,
		
00:22:54 --> 00:22:56
			I don't know, Dawson's
		
00:22:58 --> 00:22:59
			Creek pronunciation is.
		
00:23:00 --> 00:23:10
			So So dosen, I think, is this is over 10 miles away from shotgun. Shotgun is already out
		
00:23:11 --> 00:23:21
			on the outskirts of where they're staying, and then they're going even further out to dawn. So what
this text is saying is that he was far removed from
		
00:23:22 --> 00:23:25
			from his home. So it's something you know, we're taking three, four hours
		
00:23:26 --> 00:23:30
			walking to get that. And then the fact that he's wandering in the field,
		
00:23:32 --> 00:23:55
			though, I think is the word that's using Hebrew is there is the same word as used for when sheep go
wandering astray. Alright, so that's mainly because even though the story isn't going to mention,
wolf is still referring to or hinting and associating Joseph with being right a wandering sheep,
which is then subject to being preyed on by wolves.
		
00:23:57 --> 00:24:01
			So you see some some interesting connections there as well. Okay.
		
00:24:02 --> 00:24:03
			So
		
00:24:04 --> 00:24:33
			and he said my brothers I seek Tell me where the kashering okay they've got nothing. And Joseph went
after his brothers and found them adult and and they saw him from afar before he drew near them, and
they put it against him to put him to death. Okay, so that that that's the fact that for him from
from afar, that will be explained later. How do they know that it was him from from afar? And this
was that the yeah was the shirt, the tunic that you
		
00:24:35 --> 00:24:38
			hear comes that dreamer, that dream Master?
		
00:24:39 --> 00:25:00
			And so now let us kill him and fling him into the pit one of the pits, and we can say a vicious
beast as this devoured him, and we shall see what will come of his dreams. And Robin heard and came
to his rescue and said, We must not take his life. And Ruben said to them, shed no blood, fling him
into this pit in the wilderness.
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:08
			And do not raise a hand against him that he might rescue him from their hands. Right, bring him back
to his father. Right.
		
00:25:10 --> 00:25:19
			So dream master is Valhalla not like? lamb? So it's really it's like dripping with socket. Right.
There comes that cycle. I love. I see.
		
00:25:21 --> 00:25:21
			And
		
00:25:23 --> 00:25:28
			second, sorry. It's a dream, Lord. Reload. Yeah.
		
00:25:29 --> 00:25:36
			So the vicious beast isn't specified. It's just really Russia, Russia, I think.
		
00:25:37 --> 00:25:38
			I think yeah.
		
00:25:39 --> 00:25:47
			So it's just a wild beast. And in rabbinic tradition is generally considered a bad and Christian
tradition is considered the wolf.
		
00:25:48 --> 00:26:00
			And for the for the Christians is because again, it's part of the topology, they want to compare
Joseph, to Jesus. And Jesus is the Lamb, which means Joseph is the language means does your tactic
are the other rules.
		
00:26:04 --> 00:26:15
			Okay, we really homed in on this, that no man when we were talking about when they said, How to sit
at home, and you're done. Yo Italia lab.
		
00:26:16 --> 00:26:48
			Right, so she agreed to the two readings of your avatar from Raja is actually, normally animals
eating animals consuming a lot occluded by him as the same, right? human beings, but normally it's
applied to animals, not to humans, raw. And then other reading, you're attacking. Right, which is
that he will graze. And that also is actually more naturally used for the animals for the animal
because it was last him. And then they're the suburb, they're the suburb of
		
00:26:50 --> 00:26:56
			India. So the so they kind of been an extrapolation that by extension, karate is being called the
military but
		
00:26:57 --> 00:27:09
			so for, you know, the audience. So your, your daddy, one of the readings was that he will graze the
animals, but he can actually be read, he will graze as a sheep would, which
		
00:27:11 --> 00:27:27
			is a more direct meaning of your tie. Actually, yeah, that would be the more direct meaning and it's
more figuratively interpreted as he will graze as in the animals, because it's an intransitive verb.
So it actually applies to the self instead of the animals. That because it otherwise would be, yeah,
not yesterday,
		
00:27:29 --> 00:27:44
			last night, and that fits in with kind of him being portrayed as the lost sheep, you know, right. At
the eyes, it's actually the cognitive of the art. As I'm hearing this, it's not just occurring to me
that these are contradictory accounts, but it's almost as if, okay,
		
00:27:45 --> 00:28:08
			maybe I don't know this, but maybe the Quran is hinting at, okay, they take him to this faraway
place already, the outskirts that they're expected to go to is Sham, but they're all doing dopin.
Right, so they're going out of them, other than other, so they're further out than their normal, you
know, the city limits according to the biblical account, then you've got this idea that,
		
00:28:09 --> 00:28:14
			you know, the imagery is being played on here, they called him a sheep,
		
00:28:15 --> 00:28:35
			in a sense, and here, you've got the biblical count where he's wandering on his own, but actually,
they see him as a sheep, and they've kind of turned into the wolves. You know, it's, it's this motif
that's being played on from what kind of the mindset of the Genesis story is there, but now it's
being retold in such a profoundly different way.
		
00:28:36 --> 00:28:44
			You know, from from the some of these themes, these literary themes are captured in the Quran, but
then told in a very different way, like
		
00:28:45 --> 00:28:58
			them, I would think, if you were to kind of sort of reconcile the two, them taking their brother all
the way out 10 miles even further from the farthest they normally goal is to ensure there's no
coming back.
		
00:28:59 --> 00:29:03
			You know, and it raises an interesting question of
		
00:29:04 --> 00:29:29
			this is how some of the Christians were reading the story, as did they know that if they are out for
so long, their father would send Joseph to look for them. So in that case, it is premeditated that
you know, so when they say, Gary comes, let's kill him. That's not an kind of just off the spur
reaction. It's something that was already hinted at in the text. And now you know, why they've taken
so long to kind of
		
00:29:30 --> 00:29:31
			be out
		
00:29:33 --> 00:29:59
			yonder Quran even taking so long now they're saying they take they took so long to maybe provoked
Joseph to, you know, to compel Joseph Campbell, Jacob to send Joseph out there. But Carranza cow,
you've got a shot and you have gone. So the idea of them taking all day, but as you and I were
discussing, perhaps the literal usage and the deliberate usage of a shot and yeppoon in the Koran,
is to actually almost even make it seem
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:18
			To the father, we'd been looking for him all day, we were unsuccessful. There's no way to even get a
trace of him at night. So we're just coming back. And also it makes it impossible for dad to go out
on a hunt at night or to go for a search, because it's few times at that point. So they so shy as
part of the alibi that they're going to pitch to their father.
		
00:30:22 --> 00:30:44
			Yeah, so I just noticed that there's nice wordplay as well, that I hadn't picked up on before, that
Joseph is described as using the R to wander and you have your tie in. Wow. This is nice wordplay
there, which, again, is one or several kind of indications that there's a much more direct
engagement with Genesis than you might expect.
		
00:30:45 --> 00:30:52
			If you work on the model, that the Quran is just engaged with kind of the oral stuff that's being
flipped that's floating around Arabia,
		
00:30:53 --> 00:31:00
			even though To be honest, like just just from this discussion, that we always wondered, as well. And
Athena kind of wonder why he mentioned a word.
		
00:31:02 --> 00:31:06
			Why did it come to your mind at this point? So they said things like,
		
00:31:07 --> 00:31:25
			it may have been a very, you know, wolf laden area that they were going to this, which is all
possible. But even it could just be just the fact that they use that language is going to play out
like a sheep like a lamb. So then immediately sort of shooting back read, but I'm worried about the
wolf. Yeah. Even
		
00:31:31 --> 00:31:50
			if you were saying that he's not trying to be too directly antagonistic to Merck, they're meant to
get their crazy out even more. But at the same time, he's trying to let them know that I'm not
entirely naive to your schemes. And perhaps the you know, it seems to me anyway, that him saying the
wolf isn't just him literally referring to a wolf, or
		
00:31:52 --> 00:32:01
			giving some alibi. He's also trying to get at them. And saying, I can sense the wolf in you, as you
described him as a sheep running around in the fields.
		
00:32:03 --> 00:32:04
			You know, yeah.
		
00:32:06 --> 00:32:12
			Yeah. I just wanted to raise a couple. Do we get to just 23 to bring him back to his father?
		
00:32:14 --> 00:32:31
			No, we didn't say shut no blood yet. No. Okay to say that. We read that again, shed no blood pulling
it pulling him into this pit in the wilderness. I do not raise a hand against him. And he might
rescue him from their hands and bring it back to his father. Yeah. Right. So the point here is that
the,
		
00:32:32 --> 00:33:06
			the Well, that's being brought up here. This is a difference in the ground, that from that
perspective, they're not. They're still killing him. There's no mention of any traders, the traders
kind of come later on and then they get the idea. Oh, wait with me. Why don't we tell him? So Shana
blood me. Here. What Ruben is suggesting to them isn't spare his life is just let him die of
starvation and thirst in the pit rather than directly take his life. And they're happy to do that.
So for them this at this point in the story, they're still just wandering out of the way.
		
00:33:07 --> 00:33:26
			And they want to know in a distinct way, yes. So let me ask you, maybe this is coming, but he wanted
he might rescue him from their hands. Is it not that Reuben is selling them a more graphic
alternative, though, he intends to undercut them and try to save him? Is that is that the Bible's
account?
		
00:33:27 --> 00:33:35
			He wants to save them, but he sort of he's saying, look, this way, you his blood won't be on your
hands.
		
00:33:36 --> 00:33:42
			And it's really ironic, because they will still effectively have killed him. But technically, they
haven't shed his blood.
		
00:33:43 --> 00:34:05
			So it's kind of a way of getting out of shedding his blood, water at the same time ensuring that
he's dead. And for Ruben, Ruben does seem genuinely trying to get to save him. But what's
interesting is shed no blood, which I have the Hebrew here, see if you can recognize it. So I'll
fish Altis for who done L which is love Kadima. Yeah, not that's pretty cool. Adam, right.
		
00:34:07 --> 00:34:08
			DeMarco, will add to
		
00:34:09 --> 00:34:41
			the article, right? And this is really interesting in parallel with that passage. And what's
interesting is that they are kind of being swayed by kind of pi artistic arguments here. Because he
says to them, Look, if you follow my strategy, technically you won't have killed him. And then later
on, when they sell him, they say, look, if we sell him, then again, technically, we're not killing
him. He's our own flesh. Right? So they're kind of convincing themselves that they're doing
something right by adopting the stratagems as after talking about their kitabi with a coup.
		
00:34:42 --> 00:34:52
			So it's really interesting parallels some really interesting parallels with that with that story.
And it's pretty remarkable that that's a straight criticism of the Israelites. Bunny.
		
00:34:53 --> 00:34:57
			Right? In the most literal sense, the sons of Israel
		
00:35:01 --> 00:35:11
			Yeah, that's, that's remarkable insight into the biblical narrative and, like from the client's
point of view, and to the Jewish mindset over time.
		
00:35:13 --> 00:35:38
			Wow. Okay, so, and it happened when Joseph came to his brothers, that they stripped Joseph of his
tunic, the ornamental tunic that he had on him, and they took him and flung him into the pit. And
the repetition of tunic is to let you know how they recognized him from it. Okay, and the pit was
empty, and there was no water in it. And they let you know that he didn't drown. drown. Yeah.
		
00:35:41 --> 00:36:00
			So here's the tweet, guys, I'm gonna drop this hold on you, I was sitting with some scholar that
shall not be named. Who was teaching me this read? volunteer to teach me that read? Because he's
sitting there. So he said, he asked me to read the I, you know, houfy herberton job. And he said,
you have to say job.
		
00:36:02 --> 00:36:03
			And he did this like,
		
00:36:04 --> 00:36:07
			thing. Yeah. And he said this because
		
00:36:09 --> 00:36:10
			a water drop.
		
00:36:13 --> 00:36:17
			Just remember that I was 20 years old. But that was my water dropping.
		
00:36:20 --> 00:36:30
			So, I mean, guys are gonna ask you, there was a couple of we did talk about a couple of ways. Did
you eat this sort of, I was also thinking about, you know,
		
00:36:34 --> 00:36:34
			my
		
00:36:40 --> 00:36:53
			eyes are like, designed to have these models and is lengthening because there's so much you can do
with that. And then when the when the wave of disease, you know, gets caught in the act. And then
she says, Call it magic.
		
00:36:55 --> 00:36:59
			Woman rather be alakazoo.
		
00:37:02 --> 00:37:03
			Jana,
		
00:37:06 --> 00:37:13
			and then you suffer some just says, color here. Ah, well, that's me and FC, necessarily says
		
00:37:15 --> 00:37:30
			there's no mud and all this, you know. So there's, there's a lot here, like even the sounds of how
people are sort of manipulating the words and manipulating emotions and all the potentials expressed
there evidence sound. That's awesome.
		
00:37:31 --> 00:37:32
			That is awesome.
		
00:37:34 --> 00:37:37
			Water and the Bible says there's the water in the thing. So
		
00:37:39 --> 00:37:42
			the drop of water with the job was like
		
00:37:46 --> 00:37:49
			with this with this alicona we have answered the Bible plus
		
00:37:51 --> 00:37:53
			Polycom visa visa.
		
00:37:56 --> 00:37:57
			Okay. So this
		
00:37:59 --> 00:38:27
			is another example of this right of kind of terminology that's ordinarily used in a theologically
very charged way. And here is some kind of quiz. This is really consistent with youth in the in the
studio audience because, you know, they keep track of what you guys are eating and drinking. So I
just wanted to let you know, for our audience, it's just as a clarification, when you say that there
are secular motifs, some people are gonna fall off their chair, and are gonna have slaughtered lamb
to make up for what
		
00:38:29 --> 00:39:16
			I was just qualified. Let me just use there are words that are being used in select Use of that
usually refer to Alaska or the Astra. And now they're being used for matters in the dunya. And we're
used Why are you being used for other than Allah like typically, the word Aziz is used as one of the
names of Allah but now as it's being used as Minister, or Rob is an attribute to Allah, but the ROB
house and the rob the king, also excetera and Malik also, of course, is coming. Yeah, yeah. And they
were Dean is coming he deeded money, or the Quran for religion, and it's being used for the Kings
constitution or the Kings code. You know, so the she she met by circular. You're right, somebody's
		
00:39:16 --> 00:39:24
			gonna make a point. This is promoting secular. No, it's not promoting secularism, this is just you
have more experience with these.
		
00:39:29 --> 00:39:31
			But anyway, I just thought that should be said.
		
00:39:32 --> 00:39:59
			So anyway, so I'm going to so this automated tunic, they took it off of him, the pit was empty,
there was no water in it, and this had down to eat bread. And they raised their eyes and saw Look, a
caravan of ishmaelites was coming from gilliat their camels bearing gum and bomb and latinum on
their way to take down to Egypt. And Judah said to his brothers, what gain is there If we kill our
brother and cover up his blood
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:07
			Come let us sell them to the ishmaelites in our hands will not be again against him, for he is our
brother and our flesh our own planet.
		
00:40:09 --> 00:40:12
			So yeah, and was agreed. So, again, notice what's happened.
		
00:40:14 --> 00:40:41
			They want you to kill him. And Ruben said, No, don't don't kill him, just throw him into the well,
brackets, let him starve to death. And now, and then and then, you know, it's not about and I was
saying, Well, you know, that's still dead now they've got this opportunity to make some cash. And
this and this are saying, Well, actually, you're still killing him, isn't it? So that's not good. So
they're, they're they they kind of giving up the game that they knew that it still matter. And even
if that is
		
00:40:43 --> 00:40:59
			perhaps what adds commentary so well at local but infocomm is pretty remarkable commentary on how
the the moral compass is shifting constantly. For them for the ad, what the kuhlmann body is common
salahaddin, right.
		
00:41:00 --> 00:41:08
			How do you think that you can you can see that they each stage, adopting what they see is the lesser
of two evils.
		
00:41:09 --> 00:41:13
			And justifying it themselves as well. This is not so bad.
		
00:41:16 --> 00:41:25
			Moving goalposts for them in the in the biblical narrative, it's made explicit, right that they're
the ones who sold him on to the caravan, right.
		
00:41:26 --> 00:41:46
			Yeah, so there's actually a mistranslation coming up, that will point out because there's some
confusion because the Midianites are about to make an appearance. And that's caused some confusion
with the scholars, because there's the ishmaelites and the Midianites. But it's really clear that
the Midianites is just another term for the ishmaelites. And elsewhere in the Bible. It says that
Midianites
		
00:41:47 --> 00:42:22
			are a group of the ishmaelites. Or maybe it's the other way around, but it's clear that they're
synonymous. So some, some people have sort of read this and said, well, the text is sort of
corrupted here. Because it's, you know, the brothers want to sell him to the ishmaelites. When the
Midianites, come and the Midianites, enter the ishmaelites. And by the time they get to the to
Egypt, is the Midianites. Rather, Israelites were selling him on to Portugal. And you guys avoid
saying no, no, it's Midianites nation is the same people as attested elsewhere in the Bible. And it
is the cause of the confusion is the pronoun we're gonna come to it. They right. So it mentioned the
		
00:42:22 --> 00:42:30
			median licenses, and they pull them out. And people think, well, this is obviously the thing the
media has print up, it's not you have to look at it contextually is talking about the brothers the
		
00:42:31 --> 00:43:15
			use of the pronouns in the surah, as well, because you have, you know, the rule will be law. At that
point, you know, who is concealing him, but there's a clean enough is probably clear enough that
that's the travelers. So the waterbenders and maybe hiding it from the other travelers? Because
there was some interest in in not sharing this, this find that they have stumbled upon? But then
after that, you know, we're sure all will be feminine ducks in the row, Mr. Duda. What can we feed
him as a dean? So there's basically two main opinions here, either that's referring to these people
who have found him then sold them on for a paltry price, because they kind of they were concerned
		
00:43:15 --> 00:43:37
			about holding on to this liability, who might flee again, or whose rightful owner might come along
or whatever. But the other view, which is, which is there in deficit in or inherited from him?
nobis. But the love and humor is that this is referring to the brothers. Oh, wow. And read through
the Tafseer as well that it was sold him on for a paltry price.
		
00:43:39 --> 00:43:43
			Why did they do so what can we feed him in is a hidden, either the fee he refers to
		
00:43:44 --> 00:44:05
			use of meaning to say that they, you know, they didn't value him very highly anyway, so they
accepted any price, or what kind of fee if it's someone managed to say, they weren't really
concerned about the price, you know, they didn't care about the money. So they sold him for a few
few silver coins, it can also mean
		
00:44:06 --> 00:44:36
			a third, there's two things there's something that's gonna make my head explode if I don't say it,
but I'll wait for that. We're gonna be human is it can also mean if it even if it is attributed to
the brothers, that not only did they sell him, they sold him for a meaningless price, because they
just want this transaction over with before anybody finds out. So yeah, I have experienced living in
New York City. And if you're coming home from work at a late hour in New York City, somebody is
trying to sell you a watch back in the day or something. They'll take any price.
		
00:44:39 --> 00:44:51
			Because they're looking around because they probably mug somebody around the corner before. So they
have Zoho in the price. Okay, fine. I'll take 10 I'll take 10 you'll sort of $500 I'll give you 10
bucks.
		
00:44:54 --> 00:44:59
			But what's really interesting here, that's really what it is. We're getting a little bit ahead of
ourselves.
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:18
			So to head Yeah, so so the brothers are going to pull him out of the well, and send him to the
ishmaelites, truck Midianites for 20 pieces of silver, right? That's a huge amount of money. That's
for these are farmers. So they would earn that amount of money in about two to three years.
		
00:45:19 --> 00:45:53
			Oh, so the Quran is saying that that huge sum of money, they had no idea what the value of the child
was, you know, so you can read that kind of theme in his ideas in a completely different way. A lot
of money out of it, but they just had no idea what they were doing. Okay, so here's what my head was
gonna explode with. You have, I talked about the literary parallels between the story of masala
Salaam and the story of Lucifer. So I'm in the beginning of this series, and something just occurred
to me, the stopover before he is in the before he has to go back to Egypt in the Moses account is
madeon.
		
00:45:55 --> 00:46:08
			Like, there's a muddy and Stockholm, and it's in the proximity of water. And then he's back in
Egypt. And now you got a stopover at a well, and then you've got the Midianites. And he's gonna be
in Egypt.
		
00:46:16 --> 00:46:18
			My God, my God.
		
00:46:19 --> 00:46:24
			Just the idea of causes one step following the other, you know, like so.
		
00:46:26 --> 00:46:27
			Anyhow,
		
00:46:28 --> 00:46:43
			so we are from here, they're going to come back to the Father, because that's the Qurans depiction
of it the selling of it is put later on. So in the sequence of telling the story, which is why we
haven't actually talked about it in our series way because up to 18. The selling has not yet been
talked about.
		
00:46:44 --> 00:47:05
			But what is what is talked about is them coming back home and telling the story to their dad. So I
was hoping today, we can actually wrap that up and read through Yeah. I'm telling and telling that
accountant, that's where we're gonna close this discussion. I'll go back to my series, get to the
Egypt account and then we'll come back and reconvene and you know, pick up from that part of the
story each other. So let's do that. So
		
00:47:07 --> 00:47:22
			so I'm going to skip the the the selling portion of this because I'd rather compare that to when we
read when we study the origins account of the selling and you know, ending up in Egypt and all of
that. So what verse two I pick up from, to
		
00:47:24 --> 00:47:31
			talk about them telling the story tale for their dad. So maybe from and Reuben came back to the pit
because
		
00:47:33 --> 00:47:36
			halfway through halfway through verse 2029,
		
00:47:37 --> 00:47:58
			okay, and Ruben came back to the pit. And look, Joseph was not in the pit, and he rent his garments
and came back to his brothers. And he said the boys gone and I Where can I turn? And they took
Joseph's tunic and slaughtered it kid slaughtered a kid, and dip the tunic and blanket.
		
00:47:59 --> 00:48:00
			Yeah, it says a kid okay.
		
00:48:02 --> 00:48:45
			In the blood, and they sent the ornament tunic, and had it brought to their father and they said,
this we found, recognize, prayed, is it your son's tunic or not? And he recognized it and he said,
it's my son's tunic. A vicious beast has devoured him, Joseph has torn to shreds. And Joseph Joseph
rent his clothes and put sackcloth around his waist and mourn for his son many days, and all his
sons and his daughters rose to console him and he refused to be consoled. And he said rather I will
go down to my son and chill Morning. Morning. And his father keen for him. But the Midianites had
sold them to Egypt. Okay, so that's moving on. Okay, so that's this. There's a lot to unpack here.
		
00:48:45 --> 00:48:59
			But the what is rent has gardens toward their gardens out of greed. Yeah, is this one This was a
Stan. So these two three things that are mentioned of tearing your garments, wearing kind of a
loincloth. And we're third thing that says
		
00:49:04 --> 00:49:11
			and more and more just weep. There's another standard kind of ritualistic ways of mourning. I see in
ancient Israel.
		
00:49:13 --> 00:49:21
			Yeah. So what's this? The first part of this is a little confusing. Reuben came back and cried that
the boys gone. Did they say
		
00:49:22 --> 00:49:26
			that one night so that's Yeah, so I mean, so some people have tried to
		
00:49:27 --> 00:49:59
			in biblical scholarship, there's this really lazy way out when you don't understand the story. They
say the text is corrupted, right? What scholarship and they do that with the Quran, Quran as well.
But if you read carefully is really clear what's happened. So Reuben wants you to save him. And so
he said, let's put him in the pit and let him basically starve to death. That's the subtext as to
why he's away. In the meantime, the other brothers see this caravan and Judas says that sell him so
they sell him. So then Reuben is then going according to his original plan of going to the world
		
00:50:00 --> 00:50:14
			rescuing him, but he's gone in the meantime. And so Reuben is very clear. He's the eldest son. He's
not part of the plot. He didn't he was trying to find a way out. But it happened despite his
efforts.
		
00:50:15 --> 00:50:19
			I see. The Quran doesn't seem to exonerate him in that way.
		
00:50:20 --> 00:50:20
			No.
		
00:50:22 --> 00:50:32
			We're later. Like, is there a special reason why they want to sort of whitewash Rubin? Maybe in a
way? I don't know.
		
00:50:34 --> 00:50:48
			Later on in Jewish history, no, not not particularly. So I'm not sure what's going on here. I have
to look into I don't know. I mean, we have at best, you know, colocado minimum is not named. And
then the capacity, you know, fill in these gaps,
		
00:50:49 --> 00:50:52
			with a lot of inconsistency about who the client
		
00:50:53 --> 00:50:56
			is mentioned later, who's mentioned late when they're in
		
00:50:59 --> 00:51:15
			when Benjamin gets taken, is a beautiful that they say it was the same person McCartan, for example,
said it's the same one, but I'm not sure he named them as Reuben, I think they tend to name him as
Yoda. But did they say they could be they could be in a home or part time? I can't remember the
		
00:51:16 --> 00:51:17
			Yeah.
		
00:51:18 --> 00:51:25
			Does it? I can't remember exactly what the phrasing is. Because if this can be done, then that would
fit in with what we see here.
		
00:51:26 --> 00:51:43
			Whether it's some level of exoneration, that is, are we missing something? Is the dad going to say
more than this? Or just talk about his morning? No, you're gonna call them out on their lie? Is he
going to No, no, he's can he's clearly convinced. And that's probably so.
		
00:51:44 --> 00:52:28
			Because the dream for him was ambiguous. And so it's not problematic for him to be convinced because
you want to show what it might mean. And the Quran because he's seen the dream, he knows that he
can't be murdered, right? Yes, yes. And he's calling out they're lying, very elaborate, methodical
fashion. So jacobellis lambs response to all of it. First of all, starting with Bell, bell already
tells you it's a world inside of it. Because all this entire story you've just concocted, which I
wasn't buying. And clearly, at the end of it all, you have to bring the shirt out because the shirt
is not the first thing they bring out in the in the closet,
		
00:52:29 --> 00:52:56
			the closet count, they first come up with the story. And then when the story is not being sold, they
pull out what I call the nuclear device like here, can you just totally be and also, I was saying in
my, in my lecture on this, that when, you know, if you're if your brother was actually lost, and he
was devoured by an animal, then your primary concern would not be whether or not father will believe
you. Your primary concern would be the grief that you're overrun with.
		
00:52:57 --> 00:53:20
			But the Quran says mama and 30 million our openness audit in which itself just them saying that is
it even if the if the openness or the pain wasn't there, which is a red flag already? It doesn't get
better than that. But the the woma antebi movement, Ilana itself is actually a pretty good giveaway
that they're more concerned about convincing dad then they are about what happened. Yeah.
		
00:53:21 --> 00:53:23
			There's another word by the way. Another thing
		
00:53:25 --> 00:53:26
			Wow, yeah.
		
00:53:27 --> 00:53:28
			Yeah. Wow, there's a lot.
		
00:53:29 --> 00:53:33
			Yeah, that's really nice. Yeah, sorry. Sorry.
		
00:53:34 --> 00:53:38
			God, sorry. You have to do as well comes up you know, they call him use.
		
00:53:39 --> 00:53:40
			Yeah.
		
00:53:41 --> 00:53:51
			Another term for duality meaning so then you've got the father not responding with mourning. Here
you've got mourning and I'm going to mourn to it's actually
		
00:53:52 --> 00:54:39
			as much as it can be that it here. They're saying that their sons tried to console him. Right? But
you've got to know Quran actually them going at him for being in grief later on and seeing if Dakota
Caruso had Tokuda heroin, so they're actually upset with him for his grief. And then before all of
that he's actually First of all, he says button, which means this entire story, whatever it is,
isn't what actually happened. Instead, all I know something has happened, and I don't know what it
is, but it's Ameren, some decision you've taken. And you made this convenient for yourselves or
justified it to yourselves, made it made it suitable for yourself to take this course of action. And
		
00:54:39 --> 00:54:50
			he's actually analyzed their entire concocted story that there and what it also seems from the
Quranic text is that they're struggling to convince him and he's not buying it.
		
00:54:51 --> 00:54:59
			And to the point where literally coma and Toby lacunas advocate and they keep coming up with more
descriptive ways of convincing him and he just says
		
00:55:00 --> 00:55:13
			He's trying to get them to surrender their position. So hope I didn't mention this to you when we
were discussing about Entebbe walking in it's that be nice Lennar. Right. And and Amina Allah who
has an implication of surrender in a to
		
00:55:14 --> 00:55:53
			Kabbalah and other nanako Lumina laka hatanaka, aloha Jonathan to cave in to surrender to give into
somebody demands as opposed to the preposition but it's almost as though they're saying not only
will you will believe us, you're not surrendering to the version that we want you to just cave and
take. You're not buying it, can you just quit it? And they're saying that time so the Quran is
actually fighting back against this response of Yusuf alayhi salam, which I think is important for
Muslims to note also because a lot of times Muslims assume that the response of use of an ISA or
Yahuwah a sound rather was passive, that he that he just said, suburban, you know, sat back and
		
00:55:53 --> 00:55:57
			you've got to Carranza calibre, he just went into mourning and that's it.
		
00:55:58 --> 00:56:34
			Right there's no let's go out and look for him or a search or whatever else. There's there's no
further course of action. But in the in the language chosen in the Quran for jacoba It seems there
is an elaborate course of action. There's a lot of back and forth with his brothers, and he's just
kind of stuck at the end of it all. He can't get them to open up there. They've dug their heels in.
They're not giving him the real story. And so that's the point where he says sovereign jameela la
holsteiner lamotta soon, because he has no other way of getting to find out what happened. Then if
you're saying, show him and then another 10 miles, Dothan. Where's he gonna go look and old man by
		
00:56:34 --> 00:56:35
			himself.
		
00:56:37 --> 00:56:38
			You know.
		
00:56:40 --> 00:56:43
			So it is a pretty important contrast.
		
00:56:45 --> 00:56:45
			Yeah.
		
00:56:46 --> 00:56:47
			Just Just
		
00:56:49 --> 00:56:52
			furthering the studio, it is on a computer home than
		
00:56:53 --> 00:57:24
			an American but but most women, probably Masato for us, suggests that the Kabir right wasn't part of
the fleet. And that that does fit in with it. Yes. All right. Right. However, if they came back and
concocted that story, he did go along with it, right? Yes. As he as he does it as he does in the
Bible as well. Yeah. Right. So, okay, he didn't get his hands dirty. But you know how you have
mandla arm incumbent current for you. Hi, yo via de familia.
		
00:57:26 --> 00:57:34
			First, you know, it's just being able to sort of wash your hands a bit and see. Oh, it wasn't really
me. It was you know, I tried, you know, I don't think
		
00:57:35 --> 00:57:38
			it will. Yeah, yeah. You know, using this
		
00:57:40 --> 00:57:43
			Yeah, cuz I was gonna tell him that was gonna be better.
		
00:57:45 --> 00:58:00
			You're the messed up was. Now he didn't he weren't selling. Remember Ruth says Reuben and Judah. So
Reuben just wanted to save him. Judah is the one who said suggest selling him and all of this is why
ruins away. So there's, yeah.
		
00:58:01 --> 00:58:32
			There's two other brothers in the picture, Reuben and Judah. A pretty interesting story of moral
decay. If you take if you take Rubens account, okay, he wants to do something good. But now he is
reevaluating What good is. And he decides keeping this a secret, and not telling dad and not undoing
this damage or going to go find what the caravan is and retrieving our brother, none of those are an
option anymore. Right? And he sees his father grieving in front of him. And it's all those years
later in Egypt, he says, See, I told you, you should have done this, right?
		
00:58:33 --> 00:58:39
			Yeah, but what are you Oh, that time is remaining. Right? What's really interesting is so if you
recall right at the start,
		
00:58:41 --> 00:58:48
			the biblical story begins with this, these are the generations these, this is the lineage of Jacob.
And I mentioned that
		
00:58:50 --> 00:58:56
			part of what that's telling us is that this is not just Joseph's story, this is Joseph and his
brother story as well.
		
00:58:58 --> 00:59:03
			And that's why you get the use of what he what he is another really because
		
00:59:04 --> 00:59:29
			if you look at the story, I was being read by Christians and Jews, it absolutely became Joseph's
story, right? This is Joseph story. The others are this is not as interesting, but the Quran wants
to revive them. And so we I think as your as we said, the story need to bear in mind that it's not
just use it for Islam, and what happens to him it's also the brothers and what happens to them that
the Quran is saying is an ayah. Right? And,
		
00:59:31 --> 01:00:00
			and there's a zebra in it for for Australia, as it says at the end of the surah Allah, Allah. I this
has been really cool. I think we are at the corresponding point in the story and Genesis where we
are in our study of the surah in the Quran. So I'm going to cut the series of discussions short for
now and move on to what the photo Qurans depiction of Egypt and the trial that's coming and I think
probably I'll go to the point
		
01:00:00 --> 01:00:20
			Where the next, you know, location is the prison. So before we get to the prison portion of the
story, I'll go to the add up leading up to the prison. And then we'll look at the comparative
analysis from the biblical account and Charles does that go hand in both of you has been awesome and
I think this is something that should continue and shout out
		
01:00:24 --> 01:00:24
			to them.