Channel: Bilal Philips
© No part of this transcript may be copied or referenced or transmitted in any way whatsoever. Transcripts are auto-generated and thus will be be inaccurate. We are working on a system to allow volunteers to edit transcripts in a controlled system.
You have to go back and try to research as much as possible.
that is correct.
Because it certainly make an error in a particular thing.
I found that to be correct. So therefore, I'm going to reject that individual perfect
has made and
will make no mistakes in terms of conveying the nurses and
everybody else after you're
to follow those who seem to be following the tops of the
companions and scholars in charge of Hello.
We're looking at the language
considerations, it may be something because this is by narration, it may be something explained by a companion to students or the compiler that just word news this evening. And notice something as understood by the people in the dealer
teams that means, this is the source where they got the explanation for that may even be familiar to generations where they
want to work out for example, another American
arbitrage and he went when he was gathering the materials,
he went to the bedroom, oftentimes you run to the beggars whose language in the name Sure,
poetry or Islamic poetry
to build up that body of
at the time
that will be included in
the seven meetings or seven several dialects revealed. So, this is included in that you know, because this is all part of narration, which the companions and the students narrated down to us at the club
reading this way, and it was also read in that way, this word with you sometimes some revelation from the past
in other applications,
looking to see what is allowed and what is not allowed.
The things which are forbidden,
three talks about what
similarly, we have to be determining what can we do
another direct act of worship,
what you do is acceptable
for I would say rather than have
large sense that we should ask
for those who give us information.
Rather than say that way, I would say is there any evidence from the planet
asking for proof
everybody, I will take it
in our reality gun from the time of
when they're in the process of coming to decisions,
concentrated in Medina
And it was called the Sahaba. Together, they were out there anybody had anybody heard anything about them?
Before they knew any decision they would ask for
somebody stood up and said, Yes, I heard.
I also read I was there or I read another case.
So he was asking, did
Those who know if you don't know?
If you don't know? And then he also says, No, you should not.
We should not
talk about those things.
In other words, you should
select USA and furthermore, at all times
questionable character, or deviant or personally
when it comes to you with information
or standards, where if a person makes a statement concerning somebody's taxes, and we don't have evidence in our last
four years again,
there are many actual records where truth has been asked for evidence has been stopped.
proficiency in the requirements indicates that the seeking of proof may be compulsory in some cases may be recommended and others may be acceptable and others
depends on the circumstance or particular issue.
A lot requested or being she
and the compliance department
in that passion and very excited for and all the people who are seeking
the recitation of firearms
from dealing with
the use of the crime from the point of view of
like tallies where people are writing some piece of paper and roll it up in a barrel and hanging around your neck around your waist and this kind of thing kind of methodology you know, where it starts to resemble the amulet from the pagans is
selling the message is comparatively over somebody
came under the influence of magic in order to further define naturalism review
magic spells looking
reputation for for signatures, is
the method used by the companions that he was
hanging a necklace ticket on your wall
Arnold is the same for
easily defined as this as indicated.
In the case of
the weak narrations, and his old narrations of violent crime is crime.
So, those factors will come with other
aspects of extending themselves
within the context, and what the companions have to say.
these concepts largely valid in the context of
script allowed to have changed in time, if you were to look at some of the early
look at class, if you look
if I were to say your manuscript
from the 21st century, you could hardly understand dots and dashes in a single
it didn't stop at one point in
time property of those
confusing Well, a number of different 16
was very strong either hydrates you know, are not sure really.
And then some of them became the most commonly used for crime and in handwriting
became the most common use only for
a word for example, so, the word
is made up of
how you write these letters
does not affect the fact that those letters are we're
to remove any letters
right. Now, this is natural for languages to develop, because members single origin by typing you know, the type of instruments used for writing are very now we are
in our last lecture view is that
without a commentary,
takeover without the commentary,
you need to give them some commentary.
And probably, in spite of all the errors and everything that exists
Use of commentary titled, extensive,
unfortunately, does have a lot of
profanity, you know, one of
the one of the best ones to
Pixar does without commentary
to be as
reference to human beings
in reference to human beings, you know that
there are some other incidents that occurred in the silos governments are
not to allow.
we're dealing with a saturation of the price, right?
So for our purposes, it doesn't really affect us.
even think about our because picking
your house outside of that, if you do a translation of the bonds, generally accepted that, you know, whatever the words of the crime are more
someone's looking for government sent letters to the leaders of Roman
which had kradic verses in them in capitals are going to pick it up, or whatever, you know, but for our purposes, it was perfectly
Do you know where there's some difference of opinion?
most general opinion is that
my personal results, take a little
it would appear that the evidence supports that.
that looks below the ankles.
And this is a general statement specific for prayer. So the idea
is making Salaam and Lillian McClellan there's
actually nothing keeping with the
Looking at these heavies via
the view that if you're
not allowed to drink Sandy would have to make those have these
and review where it is allowable. That
would seem to be you know, this would involve doing both of these together. You know, the idea of merging ascending or descending. This is a recommendation not to do so.
Not really fear
based on the actual company,
Love to help her show
In our lives,
identical philosophical concepts
in the next lecture