Zakir Naik – Killing an Ant or Any Living Creature is Wrong. Why do Muslims then have Non-Veg Food?

			The brother posted a question but
		

			the killing of an end and even if it is an and that it is harmful, but on down the broader side
Muslims normally what they do is they try to slaughter cows, and, and everything. So they, according
to him that Muslims eat more of beef, mutton and so is that not wrong? Because in more than guida
and Bible and Quran everywhere you should show mercy to all animals. So but that's not being
followed
		

			without the question that even killing an ant is wrong
		

			and killing living creatures wrong. So why do Muslims have non weightbearing? mutton, beef killing
animals in the wrong should we show mercy? I do agree with the brother the first part of his
question, and I understand that he can understand English but you cannot speak. There are many
people there who can understand English but cannot speak English and ask me not to do so I believe
the brother can understand English. But he can't ask the question in English because more fluent in
Tamil.
		

			As far as killing any living creature unnecessary, it's a sin in Islam. In Islam, it's a sin to kill
any living creature unnecessary. And there are these invade the Prophet has said when a person was
there making a bonfire.
		

			The Prophet said, Don't make a bonfire there because their hands shift the position that the Prophet
also was worried that that bonfire may kill the ants. So he asked the sahabas to shift the position
so that the ants don't get killed. Now coming to a basic question, that why do Muslims have non wage
killing animals for non wage etc. First lll tell you that a Muslim can be a very good Muslim, even
by being a pure vegetarian.
		

			Eating non veggie, it's not compulsory in Islam, but because
		

			our Creator Allah subhanho wa Taala has given permission to have non veggie Why should we not have
it?
		

			If we analyze
		

			it mentioned the Quran is reminder chapter five, verse number one, that eat of the forfeited animals
eat of the forfeited animals which have been made lawful for your grandchildren, *, chapter six,
verse number five, that
		

			Almighty God has made for you to eat the meat of the cattle and sell places. So, remember November
23, was 21 many places no scientifically if we analyze that there is no vegetarian food, which has
all the requirements for a human being, the human beings require amino acids
		

			require 21 amino acids, out of which most of them are produced in the body, but it has to be
supplemented from the diet. These are called as eight essential amino acids, there is no vegetable
which I know of which contains all the eight amino acids.
		

			So there's no vegetable which is a complete food.
		

			So you have to take this, which is present in the non wage.
		

			Furthermore, if you analyze
		

			non rich food, it's nutritious, rich in vitamin K. And furthermore, if you analyze, if you see the
teeth of the herbivorous animals,
		

			the cow, the goat, the sheep, they are flat set of teeth. They only eat vegetables, they only touch
grass. They don't eat fresh food.
		

			If you analyze the set of teeth, of the carnivorous animals, Tiger, Lion, leopard, Cheetah, they
have appointed set of teeth, they have a combined set of teeth. These animals are known as
carnivorous animals, they only eat flesh, they don't eat vegetables. If you analyze the set of teeth
of the human beings if you go in the mirror and see we're human beings, we have got flat teeth as
well as pointed teeth. If Almighty God wanted us to have only vegetables, why did he give us this
pointed teeth can any set of teeth Why?
		

			Because Almighty God wanted us to have both vegetables as well as non rich flesh food, if he wanted
us to have only vegetables while he was appointed. Furthermore, if you analyze the dicey system of
the human beings, it can digest both which I will acknowledge the dices system of the herbivores
animals, the cow, the goat the sheep, it can only digest vegetables, it cannot digest flesh food.
The digestive system of the carnivorous animals lie in Tiger leopard, it can only digest flesh food,
it cannot digest vegetables. But the digest system the human beings has a small understand analyze
industry time, it can digest both wage as well as fresh food as well as non rich food. If Almighty
		

			God wanted us to be a pure vegetarian, why did
		

			Give us the dices have never got I just bought, but natural to have it. So if you analyze, Almighty
God made the human being in such a way so that he could eat vegetables, as well as flesh food, which
I've done which, and many people have a misconception
		

			that most of the religions, they prohibit the eating of non rich food, and many of the Hindus,
		

			they will misconception, and they think that Hinduism prohibits the eating of non rich food.
		

			In fact, if you read the scriptures,
		

			if it matters at chapter number five was number 30. It says, Almighty God created some animals to
eat and some to be eaten.
		

			Those who eat the Animals created by eating you're not doing a sin. It's mentioned Monroe's, Matthew
chapter number five, personal 39 Almighty God created sacrificial animals. So if we eat the
sacrificial animals, we're not doing a sin. Morris Millichap novel The 41 says that killing of the
sacrificial animal is not a sin.
		

			There are many quotations in the in the Scriptures, which talk about eating of non which, if you
read Marc
		

			Andreessen para chapter Limited
		

			Edition was the eldest brother of the pandas, he asked Bheeshma that what things should he give in
Yagna in Puja, so that our ancestors will be satisfied. So wish my replies that if in puja if in
Yagna, if you give Herbes and shrubs and vegetables of ancestors will be satisfied for one month, if
you give fish satisfied for two months,
		

			if you give
		

			meat for three months, if you give hair for four months, if you give God for five months, if you
give bacon for six months, if we give deer
		

			for six months, if we give birds for seven months, and the menu keeps on continuing, and it says
that if we give buffalo in Yagna 11 months, if you slaughter a cow, our ancestors will be satisfied
for one full year. And if you give a rhinoceros
		

			then our ancestors are defined inexhaustibly there's a full menu given in Marbella.
		

			So if you read the VEDA and Hindu scriptures, the shades then found they are non white, David and
beef.
		

			But the reason you find many Hindus, they say that eating non veggie is probably because they're
being influenced by the non volley philosophy.
		

			You know, even the gens and what these people who believe in normal in say, that killing of living
thing is prohibited. Therefore, killing an animal is a sin. So I agree with it, that if killing any
living creature,
		

			unnecessary is a sin. But if you say kill a living creature, a sin per se, then I tell them that
even the plants you have, they have good life.
		

			Previously, we did not know that plants have what life therefore they used to think that killing
brand is fine. Today we know that even plants have what life so the question is, can we agree plants
have what life but plant can feel pain for killing a plant, having vegetable a lesson as compared to
having non rigid flesh for
		

			reasons that they have come to know that even the plants can feel pain. But when the plants cry out,
we human Miss cannot hear the cry of the plant. Because we can hear only between 20 cycles per
second to 20,000 cycles per second. Anything below and above this we can't hear. So even the plants
cry, but we cannot hear the cry of the plant. The plants feel pain responses to the logic exchange.
		

			We understand that plants have got life they can feel pain. But you know, the plants have got two or
three senses. The animal I've got five senses, the for killing animal is a good lesson, if I agree
with them for sake of argument that plants have to three senses, animals got five senses, and that
there isn't killing animals is a good lesson. So as the question, you know the person
		

			who had a brother was born deaf and dumb, could not hear could not speak and someone goes and kills
him. Suppose you have a brother, who was born deaf and dumb, cannot hear cannot speak. And if
someone kills him, will you go and tell the judge me Lord, give the murderer less punishment because
my brother who had two senses less he could not hear you could not speak when you say that.
		

			Or you will tell me Lord, give the murderer double punishment because my brother was masumi
innocent. He could not you could not speak
		

			to an Islam. It does not mean that you have to centralize you have less punishment or you have more
sensitive more punishment.
		

			Grant says, eat of the good things you have provided to you. As long as the thing is good and it is
permitted you can have. So, in Islam, we are allowed to slaughter animal only for eating unnecessary
for hunting for sports is prohibited
		

			like making a bonfire and serving Killa profits, they don't do it. So killing any living creature is
probably unless it is for eating for survival. And it is among the permitted animals which God has
given permission as metalsmith detail. God has created some animal to eat and some to be eaten. If
you kill the animal to be eaten, you're not doing a sin.
		

			Otherwise, generally, I per se, if you analyze, I've got no problem if the non Muslims don't have
		

			non wage, because if every non Muslim in India starts having non wage then the price of mutton and
beef will go high.
		

			So I've got no problems if the non Muslims don't have non red but if anyone takes an objection that
killing animals the same that that I'm I give this answer otherwise in Islam, you can be a very good
Muslim even by being a vegetarian. But since Allah is given permission, there is no harm if you have
non wage as long as it is among the permanent animals. Hope answer the question