Dr Zakir Naik – Why Should A Disabled Person Pay A Ransom Inspite Of Being Exempted From Fasting_
Zakir Naik – Disabled Person Pay A Ransom Inspite Being Exempted From Fasting
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the issue of disabled people having to pay a payment for their fast, which is equivalent to feeding an indigent person. The cause of this payment is the modality of the situation, and if a person is disabled, he may not be able to observe the fast. The speaker suggests that if a person is disabled and missed fast, he may have to pay a payment equivalent to feeding an indigent person.
AI: Summary ©
Next point, if you like regarding the situation of a disabled person, why is it a disabled person has to pay a ransom due to the fact they haven't fasted? Unless isn't the Quran in surah baqarah chapter number two, what's the modality for that, if it is difficult for a person to fast, you can either fast appear and that is feeding of an indigent person or a poor person. The reason is, that if a person is disabled, or if you think permanently, and there are no signs that he will become healthy, where he can observe fast. So the question of him compensating
the question for him to keep the fast later on doesn't arise at all. So that is the reason for him. There is a ransom that he has to pay something that is equivalent to feeding an indigent person or feed indigent person for every fast that he has missed.