Tom Facchine – Authenticity of The Quran Explained – What’s the Proof

Tom Facchine
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the authenticity of the New centers of worship, the New centers of worship, and how they produce copies and copies of them. They note that the numbers of the numbers of the numbers of the New centers of worship are not significant, but the numbers of the numbers of the New centers of worship are significant. The speaker also mentions that the numbers of the numbers of the New centers of worship are not reliable, and that the numbers of the numbers of the New centers of worship are more authentic than the numbers of the New centers of worship.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:01 --> 00:00:25
			So a lot of people have questions about the authenticity of a Koran. And this is something I didn't
necessarily know a whole lot about until, until I had to, I was in kind of a conversation with a
couple of evangelicals. And they were claiming that the New Testament was the best preserved, it's
kind of ancient texts or whatever. And so I said, maybe it is, I don't know. And so I started kind
of investigating. And,
		
00:00:26 --> 00:01:07
			you know, at first, the the numbers that people throw around, they have to do with how many
manuscripts that are. So what's the manuscript manual from hand, the script writing, so it's talking
about a human being sitting down writing something, right for the first time, and then they get
copied, right, so then there's copies of copies of copies. So basically, you're kind of in like, you
know, a detective trying to follow it back to get to the first, you know, manuscripts are to get to
a certain time period and see how many are there? Right. So it's not necessarily significant. If
they say that, you know, the New Testament has 5000 manuscripts, that might be a significant number,
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:45
			or might not be depending on when were those manuscripts written? Are they written 500 years after
Jesus? If they are, then it's not, that's not that significant. That means that there's 500 years
that are unaccounted for, right, what happened in those 500 years, what changed, we can't tell
unless we have a paper trail, or some sort of, you know, oral tradition verification, like we have
in Islam, but that's another that's another video. So if you go to so I started looking. And
basically what I found was that if you try to find how many manuscripts exist, for the New Testament
that can be dated within 100 years of the life of Jesus.
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:49
			There's only one really.
		
00:01:51 --> 00:02:31
			And the second question that you have to ask that's significant is okay, that manuscript, how much
of the current text is represented in that manuscript are we talking about is this manuscript like a
whole copy of the New Testament, and this one particular manuscript is the size of a business card,
and I've got it had it contains a single verse of John, a gospel of John on it. So not very
significant at all. You don't really get very many manuscripts of the New Testament, until you get
into the 250s, and a three hundreds, especially after the Roman Empire, convert to Christianity,
then you get what you get, as you get an explosion of manuscripts. Now everybody's doing it,
		
00:02:31 --> 00:02:46
			everybody's writing down, you know, the, the New Testament, producing copies and copies and copies.
But that doesn't really help us. Right? When it comes to Okay, Jesus existed from this date to this
date. And then there's this time period where the record goes blank.
		
00:02:47 --> 00:03:24
			There's no paper trail. There's no oral trail. We don't know who said what to who. And then some
point 200 years later, 250 years later, 300 years later, somebody writes something now, that's
basically what we have when it comes to the New Testament. And so you can tell this is not a very
reliable source of information. Right? We haven't even the the the names of the people who
supposedly wrote the Gospels. It's not written on there. It's not saying well, this is right. This
is these are this is a lot of speculation. This is a lot of reading into things. And it's not really
found on fact, and there are scholars who deal with this, specifically like Bart Ehrman, and these
		
00:03:24 --> 00:03:51
			guys, when it comes to the Koran, then I had to look into the Quran. Okay, what I found on the Koran
is that the Quran, comparatively, is obviously a lot better, and thus more authentic as a text than
the New Testament. So there are over 50 existing manuscripts in various libraries throughout the
world and in private collections that can be dated to within 100 years of the Prophet Muhammad
salallahu Alaihe. Salam
		
00:03:53 --> 00:04:08
			and of these, okay, then the second important question, okay, over 50 That's much more. How much of
the Quran is represented in these manuscripts? Over 96% of the Quran is represented just some things
pages missing here and there?
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:30
			How, okay, great, how much difference is there between those manuscripts on the Koran that we hold
in our hands today? Basically, nothing, you occasional typo. Right. And there's a website that
collects all this information we can link to but the the so I set out to kind of look into these
things. And I found something that I had,
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:54
			that I had a hunch about before was that the Quran even if you just take the manuscript evidence is
way more authentic as a document as a text than the New Testament or any other texts that I'm aware
of, from that time period or earlier, and that doesn't even get into our oral tradition and the way
that we authentic authenticate the oral tradition