Suhaib Webb – Reading Qalun Two Hamzas Kasra or Doma

Suhaib Webb
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses two hams and the importance of knowing the impact of a change due to spot rather than dropping it. They mention a discussion about the "wellays related" to a situation and how they will explain it later on. They then move on to discuss scenarios, focusing on the impact of a change due to " spot" rather than "wellays related" and the potential for reading with " spot" on the first scenario.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:02
			Scenarios, we have 2 hams, but they are
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:04
			that's why sheikh, he says
		
00:00:07 --> 00:00:07
			So we have
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:10
			or what do we do? He says,
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:13
			We make tasil. So for example,
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:20
			So the of the first, instead of dropping
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:21
			it, you make
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:23
			Another example,
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:32
			There's a long discussion about the muj related
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:34
			to this, but just remember this, that when
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:36
			the change is with
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:41
			then we observe
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:43
			for
		
00:00:56 --> 00:00:58
			things we can explain later on, but just
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:01
			remember that when the change is due to
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:06
			When the change is due to
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12
			like Remember that. So when the change to
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:14
			do to to see, you wanna read it
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:17
			with 4. It's preferred. It's better. When the
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:20
			change is due to is spot, you read
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:20
			it with
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:22
			that's
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:25
			preferred. Although you're allowed to do
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:27
			we'll talk about that in the future.
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:30
			So now we just took both scenarios, right?
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:31
			Number 1 is
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:34
			number 2,
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:37
			right? 3 scenarios.