Suhaib Webb – An Ethical Unity

Suhaib Webb
File Size: 1.24MB
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the issue of Islam not being unified on certain issues, and how Iran has made it difficult for Muslims to pray with people who say it is recommended. The speakers agree that Islam has a flexible and rewarding maturity, but there is a disconnect between the two. The conversation ends with a discussion about Iran's stance on tolerance and maturity to non deemed Muslims.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:01 
			Second thing is that Islam didn't ask us
00:00:01 --> 00:00:04 
			to be unified on these issue issues. Actually,
00:00:04 --> 00:00:06 
			asked us to differ with maturity.
00:00:07 --> 00:00:08 
			So like last night, there was a lady
00:00:08 --> 00:00:10 
			that told me, like, how come in our
00:00:10 --> 00:00:11 
			city we don't have one to eat? Because
00:00:11 --> 00:00:12 
			you don't have to.
00:00:13 --> 00:00:14 
			But you don't have that one to eat.
00:00:14 --> 00:00:16 
			That's that's pre that's postmodern unity.
00:00:17 --> 00:00:18 
			Right? Postmodern unity is fascism.
00:00:19 --> 00:00:22 
			But Islamic unity, actually, on many issues, is
00:00:22 --> 00:00:24 
			very flexible. That's what makes it beautiful. We're
00:00:24 --> 00:00:25 
			we have a unity, but you know what?
00:00:25 --> 00:00:27 
			You have this opinion. I have that opinion.
00:00:27 --> 00:00:29 
			Imam Shafi, when he went to Iraq and
00:00:29 --> 00:00:31 
			he led salah, he didn't pray a kunoot
00:00:31 --> 00:00:31 
			in fajr.
00:00:32 --> 00:00:34 
			People ask him why. He said,
00:00:34 --> 00:00:36 
			have the cover. Respect that of Abi Hanifa.
00:00:37 --> 00:00:39 
			In America, we don't say
00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 
			but if we lead the prayers with people
00:00:42 --> 00:00:44 
			who say it is recommended for us to
00:00:44 --> 00:00:45 
			say the.
00:00:46 --> 00:00:48 
			So that maturity is there. Some people don't
00:00:48 --> 00:00:50 
			have that maturity. Okay. Fine. You don't have
00:00:50 --> 00:00:52 
			it? At least we agree to disagree. If
00:00:52 --> 00:00:54 
			I can say to a disbeliever,
00:00:56 --> 00:00:58 
			why can I say to a Muslim,
00:01:02 --> 00:01:02 
			Insanity?
00:01:03 --> 00:01:04 
			Oftentimes, we think of as
00:01:05 --> 00:01:08 
			being strictly a message to Kufar, but what's
00:01:08 --> 00:01:09 
			inferred from is
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12 
			a message of tolerance and maturity
00:01:13 --> 00:01:14 
			to non Kufar.