Shadee Elmasry – Interview Blogging Theology NBF 288

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of laughter, the holy eye, the Bible's teachings, and the holy spirit in the creation process of humans. They also talk about theology and the importance of the Bible's teachings in bringing out the message of Jesus and the return of the Son of Man. The history and third-quarter-quarter terms are also discussed, with the third-quarter term being a moral dilemma on AI and war due to the robot killing a baby and causing war Crites.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:54 --> 00:00:58

Smilla Rahmanir Rahim Al hamdu lillah wa Salatu was Salam ala

00:00:58 --> 00:01:02

Rasulillah early he was happy woman. Well, ladies and gentlemen,

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05

welcome to the stuffiness, society, nothing but facts live

00:01:05 --> 00:01:10

stream on a gorgeous Wednesday. And it is between Dora and Astrid

00:01:10 --> 00:01:13

here in the United in the United States in the great state of New

00:01:13 --> 00:01:16

Jersey, where we're streaming right down the street from the

00:01:16 --> 00:01:20

University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, and

00:01:20 --> 00:01:24

Rutgers University. Today, we have a wonderful guests, we have

00:01:25 --> 00:01:29

somebody who has enriched, I would say, the intellectual and

00:01:29 --> 00:01:33

spiritual lives of I could think I could say millions of people now,

00:01:33 --> 00:01:39

based on his viewers, and his Twitter handle is also nobody has

00:01:40 --> 00:01:42

had more impact with less words

00:01:44 --> 00:01:48

than our guests. Let's bring him on Omar, Paul Williams, of

00:01:48 --> 00:01:49

blogging theology

00:01:52 --> 00:01:55

when it comes to them, or how to live on it, gotcha. So you made me

00:01:55 --> 00:01:55

laugh.

00:01:57 --> 00:02:01

But it is true, though, right? What if you I liked I liked I like

00:02:01 --> 00:02:08

tweets that are price impact for hopefully witchy coin, rather than

00:02:08 --> 00:02:12

explaining everything, getting the grammar wrong and the spelling. So

00:02:12 --> 00:02:16

yeah, I like epic, Chromat epic, epic grammatic tweet.

00:02:17 --> 00:02:21

I love those tweets that you can read in less than three seconds.

00:02:21 --> 00:02:24

Exactly. And that's one of the reasons why

00:02:25 --> 00:02:29

pictures were worth 1000 words. Because in a millisecond, you get

00:02:29 --> 00:02:32

all these messages in one write, and it's brilliant. And oftentimes

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34

your tweet is just a picture

00:02:35 --> 00:02:36

with one line,

00:02:37 --> 00:02:40

sometimes just just a picture. And I think that's even the best

00:02:40 --> 00:02:45

because I like to very much assume that people who sing my stuff are

00:02:45 --> 00:02:49

intelligent and can actually work out the message for them. So they

00:02:49 --> 00:02:53

do not need to be spoon fed what exactly indicate. So there's a

00:02:53 --> 00:02:56

deliberate attempt there to actually minimize my own verbal

00:02:56 --> 00:03:00

contribution to help people figure it out for themselves. And that's

00:03:00 --> 00:03:04

part of my agenda. Really, it also when you when you say less, and

00:03:04 --> 00:03:07

you put a picture up there,

00:03:08 --> 00:03:12

you actually save yourself a lot of headache and heartache because

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15

people won't come after you. Right? I'm just putting up a

00:03:15 --> 00:03:19

picture, right? If people go after the picture, right, there is that

00:03:19 --> 00:03:22

there's also it is actually people that can be misunderstood. For

00:03:22 --> 00:03:25

example, my know design posts, which medium for a while now.

00:03:26 --> 00:03:29

There are people out there I come across occasionally who are

00:03:29 --> 00:03:33

absolutely convinced that I'm an atheist. Wow. No, seriously,

00:03:33 --> 00:03:37

because I say no design. They got it wrong. Then they got the facial

00:03:37 --> 00:03:41

expression. Exactly. They missed the emoji with the eyes looking

00:03:41 --> 00:03:42

up. So they go, huh.

00:03:43 --> 00:03:47

irony, the subtext to this, so they're not doing the work? Yeah,

00:03:47 --> 00:03:51

hoping by reading it intelligently. And I've had

00:03:51 --> 00:03:54

arguments to people try to tell them I'm not an atheist, and they

00:03:54 --> 00:03:55

don't agree with me.

00:03:56 --> 00:04:00

When I caught myself, a Muslim, it's kind of weird. I mean, they

00:04:00 --> 00:04:03

know what I think better than I do. I mean, great. I'll tell you,

00:04:03 --> 00:04:07

I'll tell you the all time and I say this genuinely the all time

00:04:07 --> 00:04:10

best refutation of of evolution.

00:04:11 --> 00:04:16

Is the picture is your picture next to the statue of Charles

00:04:16 --> 00:04:21

Darwin. Hashtag no design, rolling, guys, right? Because

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24

think about that brilliance of that, because we nobody would

00:04:24 --> 00:04:29

accept that the statue has no design. Right has to have a person

00:04:29 --> 00:04:34

behind it with an intellect a will and ability, right and knowledge.

00:04:34 --> 00:04:36

Right? And we should say knowledge, not intellect,

00:04:37 --> 00:04:42

knowledge, life, ability, and willpower. These four attributes

00:04:42 --> 00:04:47

cannot exist outside of a statue. Right? Yeah. No, I enjoyed that. I

00:04:47 --> 00:04:50

haven't. I thought I've got to have my photograph taken with

00:04:50 --> 00:04:50

Charles Darwin.

00:04:51 --> 00:04:55

And but if I can just clarify one point. Yeah. People often

00:04:55 --> 00:04:59

sometimes think that I'm anti evolution. Yeah. I

00:05:00 --> 00:05:03

That's not quite I'm a creationist, but then all

00:05:03 --> 00:05:06

believers are creationist, every single Christian believing Jew.

00:05:07 --> 00:05:10

But it doesn't mean I believe the universe was created in six days,

00:05:10 --> 00:05:14

or that all those species were created instantaneously by God

00:05:14 --> 00:05:18

wasn't some kind of macro process leading up to human. So leading up

00:05:18 --> 00:05:22

to animals. Yeah, it just went, which was which God did through

00:05:22 --> 00:05:26

that mechanism. I just say the red line when it comes to human

00:05:26 --> 00:05:31

beings. The Quran is very clear that God created Adam and Eve and

00:05:31 --> 00:05:33

by special creation, and I draw a red line at that that is

00:05:34 --> 00:05:38

absolutely evolution doesn't come into that. That's exactly the

00:05:38 --> 00:05:41

Islamic position. And you've interviewed a lot of people on

00:05:41 --> 00:05:44

that, but that is exactly the Slavic position is that the

00:05:44 --> 00:05:48

theology of Islam only requires deep belief in direct creation,

00:05:49 --> 00:05:54

for the human being. As for frogs, giraffes, whatever you want to

00:05:54 --> 00:05:57

believe it, you won't, you're not going to be asked about that.

00:05:57 --> 00:06:00

Right? You want to believe they came out of each other, or you

00:06:00 --> 00:06:03

want to believe that they were created just like Adam was

00:06:03 --> 00:06:05

created. It's up to you. But

00:06:07 --> 00:06:11

there is no theology or obligations on animals giraffes,

00:06:11 --> 00:06:16

dogs, cats and squirrels and insects. Another thing by the way,

00:06:16 --> 00:06:19

about the you know, design post the pictures is that they're

00:06:19 --> 00:06:22

intended deliberately almost subliminally to get at the

00:06:22 --> 00:06:27

fitness, the fitness the Fitzrovia, the fitness. The fitrah

00:06:27 --> 00:06:30

Yeah, always mixed up. The fitrah is supposed to trigger that at

00:06:30 --> 00:06:34

some level, even in the atheist, when they see morals or creation,

00:06:34 --> 00:06:38

clearly the heady sign Yeah, idiot naughty, but intellectually, they

00:06:38 --> 00:06:41

may not acknowledge that but seeing a picture, not not an

00:06:41 --> 00:06:46

argument, not refutation, not a form of words, saying Darwin was

00:06:46 --> 00:06:47

wrong, but picture

00:06:49 --> 00:06:53

gets to one at an almost a subliminal level of response. And

00:06:53 --> 00:06:57

that's why I think the what the Quran talks about the victories is

00:06:57 --> 00:07:01

so helpful that yeah, that's why the Quran says look so many times,

00:07:01 --> 00:07:08

and looking, it moves emotion, and an emotion, it's not just any

00:07:08 --> 00:07:14

motion, it's an awe, and you don't have all out of accidents, nobody

00:07:14 --> 00:07:18

is in awe of an accident, and you're always in awe of something

00:07:18 --> 00:07:22

that's, that was done right or done beautifully or done

00:07:22 --> 00:07:28

perfectly. So the feeling of awe never comes about when viewing

00:07:28 --> 00:07:33

randomness, it always comes about when viewing something that

00:07:33 --> 00:07:38

deserves praise, right. And that's the that's the rationality about

00:07:38 --> 00:07:41

the Quran mandate to look keep looking and looking and looking.

00:07:42 --> 00:07:45

All right, your your heart will tell you that there has to be some

00:07:45 --> 00:07:48

knowledge and life and will behind this. And that's the motivation

00:07:48 --> 00:07:51

behind this is basically expressing the chronic injunction

00:07:51 --> 00:07:56

but in terms of no design posts, so that really is the what's going

00:07:56 --> 00:08:00

on there. Now, for those watching on Instagram, you can only see

00:08:00 --> 00:08:04

half of me and half of our guests, so hop over to YouTube, Safina

00:08:04 --> 00:08:08

society. And you can and you could watch the rest of this interview

00:08:08 --> 00:08:11

with both of us here and you can comment and we'll be taking some

00:08:11 --> 00:08:16

q&a and q&a If our guests approves. I'm happy long as

00:08:16 --> 00:08:20

they're not difficult questions. Yeah. Because Because your your

00:08:20 --> 00:08:22

interviews are always pre recorded, right? There's no

00:08:22 --> 00:08:25

audience interaction. Now there's a reason but I'll come to the

00:08:25 --> 00:08:29

reason why in a sec. If you want. Yeah. Okay, good. Now today for

00:08:29 --> 00:08:33

your for you who have always been listening to blogging theology.

00:08:34 --> 00:08:37

This is your chance to be able to talk all right to the interviewer

00:08:37 --> 00:08:43

himself. Now let's go back about five years. And I remember we you

00:08:43 --> 00:08:46

see you in different comments, right, and knowing that this is

00:08:46 --> 00:08:50

somebody who converted to Islam, and sometimes you ask a question

00:08:50 --> 00:08:51

or say common

00:08:52 --> 00:08:57

time passed, then didn't see you for some period of time. Then I

00:08:57 --> 00:08:59

don't know I wasn't paying attention. Or maybe I was off

00:08:59 --> 00:09:02

social media for a period of time because sometimes I do go off, I

00:09:02 --> 00:09:08

come back. And all of a sudden, blogging theology is a massive

00:09:08 --> 00:09:12

operation. And your Twitter handle is gone through the roof. And I'm

00:09:12 --> 00:09:17

thinking myself, what happened to this brother, he's just like,

00:09:18 --> 00:09:20

swallowed a Mario Brothers mushroom. You remember Mario

00:09:20 --> 00:09:24

Brothers, like swallowed the mushroom, and now he's on fire. So

00:09:24 --> 00:09:30

what exactly transpired? Well, hamdulillah God transpired and

00:09:30 --> 00:09:34

took me out of a fairly bad place several years ago, about three or

00:09:34 --> 00:09:38

four years ago. We won't go into that now, if you don't mind. It

00:09:38 --> 00:09:43

was a rather difficult place in terms of my deen and so on. And it

00:09:43 --> 00:09:46

was really during the lockdown in Cote during COVID. Actually, when

00:09:46 --> 00:09:52

I found myself here in this place, quite isolated as as millions of

00:09:52 --> 00:09:54

people in Britain in the world actually were.

00:09:56 --> 00:09:59

And I came into some money and I decided, hey,

00:10:00 --> 00:10:04

Why not buy a new MacBook Pro? Fascia, all this money didn't

00:10:04 --> 00:10:07

really need at the top of the range MacBook Pro, but hey, I had

00:10:07 --> 00:10:11

the money, so I buy it anyway. And, and through that on YouTube,

00:10:11 --> 00:10:14

I thought, well, I'll make some videos because it's a way of

00:10:14 --> 00:10:17

making contact with the world out there having some online

00:10:17 --> 00:10:20

interaction, they didn't really have I had about about 20 Or

00:10:20 --> 00:10:25

sorry, 2000 Twitter followers about 2000 A little bit of

00:10:25 --> 00:10:28

interaction, I thought videos is really my medium, much more. And

00:10:29 --> 00:10:32

so I just started to make a couple of videos, I think on

00:10:32 --> 00:10:35

Christianity, New Testament studies, Biblical Studies,

00:10:35 --> 00:10:39

historical Jesus, things are interested in me, drawing on the

00:10:39 --> 00:10:44

books behind me my reading. And, and that's how it started, it was

00:10:44 --> 00:10:49

very much my attempt to reach out during the isolation of COVID. But

00:10:49 --> 00:10:52

after a couple of months, something strange started to

00:10:52 --> 00:10:57

happen that the subscriptions and interest started to take off, but

00:10:57 --> 00:11:01

in a way that was quite unexpected. So I would have

00:11:01 --> 00:11:05

several 1000 new subscribers a day. And and then

00:11:06 --> 00:11:10

I after a while, after a couple of months, it was several months, I

00:11:10 --> 00:11:14

thought be really nice to have a guest. There's no chance I'm going

00:11:14 --> 00:11:17

to get a scholar on because they don't know about me and I'm not a

00:11:17 --> 00:11:21

scholar myself, of course, don't have a PhD. So why would they come

00:11:21 --> 00:11:24

up? So, but nevertheless, I reached out to someone that I

00:11:24 --> 00:11:28

quite liked a guy called Sir Anthony buzzard. He was actually

00:11:28 --> 00:11:33

was the head of Atlanta College in Georgia in the United States is an

00:11:33 --> 00:11:36

Englishman. And his father actually was head of Naval

00:11:36 --> 00:11:40

Intelligence during the Second World War. And he is incredibly

00:11:40 --> 00:11:43

distinguished lineage, distinguished himself. So I

00:11:43 --> 00:11:46

invited him on, hey, because he's a he's a Unitarian Christian uses

00:11:46 --> 00:11:49

a Unitarian. So I thought this is interesting, we can talk about

00:11:49 --> 00:11:54

Jesus. And so I invited him and amazingly, he said, Yes, but wow,

00:11:54 --> 00:11:59

this is a big coup. No, wrong. And we had such a good time. I mean,

00:11:59 --> 00:12:03

it's such a great guy. And, and we had a really good conversation

00:12:03 --> 00:12:06

about New Testament Greek and Christology and the struggle of

00:12:06 --> 00:12:11

Jesus extra. And so that was like, that broke the barriers a bit for

00:12:11 --> 00:12:14

me. And I thought, well, you know, I'd like to try someone else. But

00:12:14 --> 00:12:19

this time go for a top notch American scholar that I knew John

00:12:19 --> 00:12:24

Dominic Crossan, who was the head of the Jesus Seminar. He was

00:12:24 --> 00:12:26

professor at DePaul University, one of the world's leading

00:12:26 --> 00:12:28

scholars is still there, both of these people are still very much

00:12:28 --> 00:12:32

with us and writing. And amazingly, he said, Yes.

00:12:33 --> 00:12:37

And that really showed me that it was possible to seriously invite

00:12:37 --> 00:12:40

but I had a track record that actually had people are invited.

00:12:40 --> 00:12:43

And the videos were doing well. Yeah, that that was the beginning

00:12:43 --> 00:12:52

of my engagement with academics. And my, my philosophy, still is my

00:12:52 --> 00:12:57

attitude is attempting to build a bridge between the ivory tower,

00:12:57 --> 00:13:01

the world of academia, and the intelligent layperson you will

00:13:01 --> 00:13:02

have in mind this is

00:13:04 --> 00:13:08

and to get experts on who could explain their expertise in ways

00:13:08 --> 00:13:11

that which we can all answer. So I'm not just passively listening,

00:13:11 --> 00:13:13

I'm hopefully engage in conversation asking him to clarify

00:13:13 --> 00:13:16

what they mean, are they difficult terms allows them to define what

00:13:16 --> 00:13:20

they mean. So that there is some input, but I'm there very much

00:13:20 --> 00:13:26

like the viewer, as a person who is benefiting from their

00:13:26 --> 00:13:31

expertise. And it's been, I can't stress this enough, this has been

00:13:31 --> 00:13:35

a huge privilege for me to meet these people, including yourself

00:13:35 --> 00:13:38

because you've been handled as a guest. I can't stress how much a

00:13:38 --> 00:13:42

privilege has been for me, and I've learned so much as have many

00:13:42 --> 00:13:46

other people, as you've alluded to, before, I can imagine because

00:13:46 --> 00:13:51

I watch your Alia, type videos. And those were like three hours

00:13:51 --> 00:13:54

part one and part two, when I think there's part three even

00:13:56 --> 00:13:59

there's like two and three hours. So I can imagine you basically are

00:13:59 --> 00:14:02

going to school for free essentially, right? Yes, it's

00:14:02 --> 00:14:06

Yeah, makes sense. It is it's a free University. Dr. Alia, tie is

00:14:07 --> 00:14:11

I don't embarrass the guy. He's a friend of mine I met him is he is

00:14:11 --> 00:14:15

such a talented man is appalling as a polymath, by which I mean,

00:14:15 --> 00:14:19

he's actually expert in multiple subjects, including a biblical

00:14:19 --> 00:14:23

Hebrew, New Testament Greek, Arabic, English, obviously, Farsi

00:14:23 --> 00:14:28

is expert on the Bible has a PhD in it, and Islam. And this is a

00:14:28 --> 00:14:32

unique, we're not very rare skill set.

00:14:33 --> 00:14:38

But so yeah, I have a huge fan of his as well. And when I was as a

00:14:38 --> 00:14:39

tuner back in February,

00:14:40 --> 00:14:43

for several days, he invited me to sit in on one of his classes where

00:14:43 --> 00:14:47

he was doing the theology of Judaism and I thought, Wow, what a

00:14:47 --> 00:14:51

privilege set there. You know, my jaw drops as I listen to this, and

00:14:51 --> 00:14:56

he is witty in his classes during term time as he is like, in the

00:14:56 --> 00:14:59

rest of his life, he's actually painting I mean, he's, he's not at

00:14:59 --> 00:14:59

all boring.

00:15:00 --> 00:15:03

So your first few guests, were these, these Christian scholars

00:15:03 --> 00:15:08

study that talk about Christology. So you have a deep interest in

00:15:08 --> 00:15:12

Christian theology. Absolutely. And and is that something that was

00:15:12 --> 00:15:16

from your, from your? Were you ever involved academically with

00:15:16 --> 00:15:18

that? Or is it all personal?

00:15:19 --> 00:15:22

It's always been personal, I became a committed born again,

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25

Christian, in my early 20s. And evangelical actually.

00:15:26 --> 00:15:29

And I immediately took to reading the Bible, I loved the Bible, it

00:15:29 --> 00:15:32

became a life for me the word of God, and I believe it is inerrant.

00:15:32 --> 00:15:35

So what many people call a fundamentalist Christian.

00:15:37 --> 00:15:40

And that was both my strength and my weakness. The strength was I

00:15:40 --> 00:15:42

took the Bible very seriously, which we have to do in today's

00:15:42 --> 00:15:46

world, even now, with events in Palestine, the Bible has been used

00:15:46 --> 00:15:50

across by many to weaponize oppression of people but but also

00:15:50 --> 00:15:54

because it is such an interesting book, actually, it's a library of

00:15:54 --> 00:15:57

books. But the problem was, and this is the downside of it. The

00:15:57 --> 00:16:01

more I read, the more I realized that there were problems, big

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04

problems with the Bible, particularly the New Testament.

00:16:04 --> 00:16:09

And so this is set me on a journey of given my nature of accessing

00:16:09 --> 00:16:16

biblical scholars in books, to try and find answers. And that led me

00:16:16 --> 00:16:21

to be an undergraduate studying Christian theology University. So

00:16:21 --> 00:16:24

I did study academically, but I've always been interested in the

00:16:24 --> 00:16:28

Bible. Still, I'm still reading it now. Because it is, apart from the

00:16:28 --> 00:16:32

Quran, of course, the world's most important book, and in hugely

00:16:32 --> 00:16:34

influential on the Western tradition, the Western mindset

00:16:34 --> 00:16:38

MEP, even people to secular, many of the categories of thought that

00:16:38 --> 00:16:42

they have and and assumptions about reality, are still rooted in

00:16:42 --> 00:16:43

parts of the Bible.

00:16:44 --> 00:16:47

And so it's really important to understand it anyway. Even if you

00:16:47 --> 00:16:50

don't believe in God is important to understand anything. Can you

00:16:50 --> 00:16:54

share some of those things that you found to be start triggering

00:16:54 --> 00:16:57

your mind that there are some issues here? Yeah, I'm not going

00:16:57 --> 00:17:00

to too technical. If you read the gospels, and then Paul's letters,

00:17:01 --> 00:17:05

if you read, say, the earliest Gospel of Mark, it becomes

00:17:05 --> 00:17:08

apparent in several places like Mark chapter 13, that it looks

00:17:08 --> 00:17:13

like Jesus foretold the Second Coming the end of the world,

00:17:14 --> 00:17:17

within the generation of people then living in the first century.

00:17:17 --> 00:17:22

And Mark 1330, if you go and look it up, now you'll see all these

00:17:22 --> 00:17:25

things it says will happen within this generation. All these things

00:17:25 --> 00:17:29

refers to the preceding narrative, which includes the destruction of

00:17:29 --> 00:17:33

the temple and at 70, and the return of the Son of Man on the

00:17:33 --> 00:17:36

clouds of glory. I thought this can't be right. Because firstly,

00:17:36 --> 00:17:39

the Bible that didn't happen when 2000 years later, also means Jesus

00:17:39 --> 00:17:42

made a mistake. That can't happen because Jesus is God, I believed.

00:17:42 --> 00:17:46

So off I went to read New Testament scholars, and I

00:17:46 --> 00:17:49

discovered something pretty startling in the last couple of

00:17:49 --> 00:17:52

100 years. What's called eschatology,

00:17:53 --> 00:17:57

which is this study of the End Times. And the the sense of

00:17:57 --> 00:18:01

imminent eschatology we see in the New Testament has been a central

00:18:01 --> 00:18:04

theme in New Testament scholarship. You know, what's the

00:18:04 --> 00:18:08

Bible most scholars think in, in some places has got it wrong.

00:18:08 --> 00:18:11

Paul, for example, expects the end of the world within his own

00:18:11 --> 00:18:15

lifetime. But the later writers don't Luke doesn't so much John

00:18:15 --> 00:18:19

doesn't so much. It's complicated, because the library, but this

00:18:19 --> 00:18:21

shocked me, I thought, hang on, there shouldn't be any mistakes,

00:18:21 --> 00:18:22

especially not by Jesus.

00:18:24 --> 00:18:28

So I went, I read, you know, Tom Wright anti rights, and I go

00:18:28 --> 00:18:31

through a long list of people I read, commentary, I've read over

00:18:31 --> 00:18:35

50, at least 50. Quiet, I stopped counting after or at least 50

00:18:35 --> 00:18:41

academic commentaries on Mark 13. Alone. Yeah. And it's parallel

00:18:41 --> 00:18:45

passages, Matthew 24, Luke 21, to try and find an answer to this

00:18:45 --> 00:18:49

thing, because it I find it threatening to my face. So that

00:18:49 --> 00:18:51

that was one is that there are many obviously, the problem is

00:18:51 --> 00:18:53

once you start reading a scholarship, you discover other

00:18:53 --> 00:18:56

issues that I wasn't aware of, which then became problems

00:18:56 --> 00:18:59

themselves example the nature of the fourth gospel, the gospel of

00:18:59 --> 00:19:02

John. And that was perhaps in bigger threat,

00:19:03 --> 00:19:08

academic stuff, but which your average Christian has no idea

00:19:08 --> 00:19:11

about, and yet all their scholars do they know about these problems.

00:19:12 --> 00:19:16

So part of my job on BT some extent has been to share what

00:19:16 --> 00:19:20

Christian scholars have been saying about the Bible and share

00:19:20 --> 00:19:26

that with Christians. So just so people understand. The Bible is

00:19:26 --> 00:19:30

not exactly the word is given to Jesus directly. It's marked

00:19:30 --> 00:19:35

Matthew Paul, these gospels are essentially biographies

00:19:35 --> 00:19:41

biographical accounts of Jesus. Okay, so, what we would call like

00:19:41 --> 00:19:45

Cyrano narrations, or narratives, exactly the Injeel, the Gospel as

00:19:45 --> 00:19:49

the crown calls it, is the gospel given to Jesus. And actually, the

00:19:49 --> 00:19:53

Bible says this too, if you look at the same mark, you have, and

00:19:53 --> 00:19:57

Jesus went around Galilee, preaching the gospel, the gospel

00:19:57 --> 00:19:59

wasn't the message about Jesus

00:20:00 --> 00:20:03

wasn't Christianity. It was the gospel. And if you want to know

00:20:03 --> 00:20:06

about it, you can read in the gospels in the Bible today. So the

00:20:06 --> 00:20:09

the four gospels don't even pretend to be revelation. They

00:20:09 --> 00:20:12

don't pretend to be inspired. And he later gospel writers correct,

00:20:12 --> 00:20:16

alter and amend and embellish earlier gospels. So Matthew and

00:20:16 --> 00:20:21

Luke famously correct mark on key points, which is fascinating is

00:20:22 --> 00:20:24

called redaction criticism in its own in our own right. But the

00:20:24 --> 00:20:28

gospel given to Jesus what he preached is what Muslims believe

00:20:28 --> 00:20:32

in. And scholars are made this lovely distinction, which is so

00:20:32 --> 00:20:36

important that there's the gospel of Jesus. And then there's a

00:20:36 --> 00:20:40

gospel about Jesus that makes sense about Jesus is called

00:20:40 --> 00:20:45

Christianity. The gospel of Jesus is what Muslims believe in. And if

00:20:45 --> 00:20:48

you look at the details, even in the gospels, we have now you can

00:20:48 --> 00:20:54

see the themes are the same. Yeah. So now, you got into this, you

00:20:54 --> 00:20:58

found some issues. I assume the evangelical tradition is very

00:20:58 --> 00:21:05

prejudiced against Islam and in imbues in its people. An emotional

00:21:05 --> 00:21:08

reaction towards Islam. It's one of the greatest enemies. I just

00:21:08 --> 00:21:13

was listening to some a gentleman, very soft spoken gentleman, but he

00:21:13 --> 00:21:18

was saying the Great Four abominations are homosexuality,

00:21:20 --> 00:21:25

listen to other things. And he listed Islam as one of the four

00:21:25 --> 00:21:30

great abominations to a Christian. Okay, so Oh, he said,

00:21:30 --> 00:21:34

homosexuality, abortion. Can't remember the third one. And then

00:21:34 --> 00:21:39

it was Islam was the fourth one. So were you also did they imbibe

00:21:39 --> 00:21:42

that inside of you to whoever the Evangelicals that you were you

00:21:42 --> 00:21:45

were keeping up with it's time? Well, to some extent, yeah, I

00:21:45 --> 00:21:48

mean, British evangelicalism is much more

00:21:50 --> 00:21:53

lukewarm, less extreme than the American version. A lot of

00:21:53 --> 00:21:56

American evangelicals, we know who they are, they attack, many of

00:21:56 --> 00:22:00

them attack Islam. British evangelicals tend to be more mild

00:22:00 --> 00:22:03

for some reason. Everything about the British is more mild, right?

00:22:03 --> 00:22:05

That's what we like to think. And,

00:22:06 --> 00:22:10

and except when it comes to supporting states like Israel,

00:22:10 --> 00:22:12

then we're quite happy to send them arms and give them political

00:22:12 --> 00:22:17

cover, which has not been mild at all. It's quite evil. Anyway. So

00:22:17 --> 00:22:21

yeah, I agree. And I think one of the reasons though, apart from

00:22:21 --> 00:22:25

racism, Islamophobia, just sheer bigotry, but there's actually a

00:22:25 --> 00:22:28

theological reason, and that these evangelicals believe that I have

00:22:28 --> 00:22:30

particular understanding of Christianity, which means that

00:22:30 --> 00:22:33

anything that comes after Christianity and their view, which

00:22:33 --> 00:22:38

denies say, the divinity of Jesus, must be evil, by definition,

00:22:38 --> 00:22:41

because it's denying a central truth of the Christianity. So they

00:22:41 --> 00:22:46

have a theological motivation, you know, as well, but they tend to

00:22:46 --> 00:22:51

obviously defame and speak evil of a lie. Actually, I've noticed

00:22:51 --> 00:22:54

about Islam as well. So they make it they make their objections a

00:22:54 --> 00:22:59

lot worse than they could have been, I think. And so were you

00:22:59 --> 00:23:03

with a group? Or were you just going solo on this? Oh, no, I,

00:23:03 --> 00:23:08

that's the curious thing, really. I never publicly, publicly ever

00:23:08 --> 00:23:12

express my views about Islam, I expressed my concerns to fellow

00:23:12 --> 00:23:16

Christians, I remember, or a couple of them in my church, who I

00:23:16 --> 00:23:21

did, you know, express my great alarm about Islam and Muslims,

00:23:21 --> 00:23:25

particularly in London here. But I never expressed it on social, so

00:23:25 --> 00:23:29

nothing like that at all. So then you're with a group of people. And

00:23:29 --> 00:23:31

I don't want to say the word herd mentality. But that's usually what

00:23:31 --> 00:23:34

group mentality, we could say. group mentality is very strong,

00:23:34 --> 00:23:38

when everyone in the group has the same kind of loves and hates. It's

00:23:38 --> 00:23:42

very strong to come out of that. So how did you eventually come out

00:23:42 --> 00:23:46

of that into eventually investigating Islam?

00:23:48 --> 00:23:50

Yeah, it's not. It's not a very interesting story, really. But

00:23:50 --> 00:23:56

it's how I embraced Islam. So at some point, I became quite as

00:23:56 --> 00:24:01

homophobic as I say, in my own mind. And I decided to, because I

00:24:01 --> 00:24:06

was just, I already had learned that the media, for example, often

00:24:06 --> 00:24:09

don't fairly represent positions, which I knew were quite different.

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12

For example, on Christianity, I thought that often you get sort of

00:24:13 --> 00:24:18

misunderstanding. I thought, well, maybe I misunderstood Islam. Maybe

00:24:18 --> 00:24:22

the media used to read I don't know watch the BBC or whatever,

00:24:22 --> 00:24:26

Daily Mail. And so I thought I'd investigate this but it's also a

00:24:26 --> 00:24:29

curious as wants to learn more about Islam. So I bought a

00:24:29 --> 00:24:33

dreadful translation with the crown. And, and that didn't work.

00:24:33 --> 00:24:36

I just couldn't, I couldn't even engage with the Crown at all. But

00:24:36 --> 00:24:40

I did then go to my local mosque here at Regent's Park Mosque,

00:24:40 --> 00:24:41

which is,

00:24:42 --> 00:24:46

you know, pretty important mosque actually in Britain, and just

00:24:46 --> 00:24:48

walked through the door and I thought I'd give myself three

00:24:48 --> 00:24:51

months. I'm going to talk to some Muslims read some of their stuff.

00:24:51 --> 00:24:53

And then at least I would have made the effort to learn more

00:24:53 --> 00:24:56

about this religion, which I thought was profoundly wrong.

00:24:56 --> 00:24:56

Yeah.

00:24:58 --> 00:25:00

So I walked in the door there and on the

00:25:00 --> 00:25:03

right hand side, you know, the Masters bookstore are books, I

00:25:03 --> 00:25:07

recognize that so you know when, and some kind Muslim brother

00:25:07 --> 00:25:12

bought me a heap full of books, and a good translation of the

00:25:12 --> 00:25:16

Quran. And and that started me on a journey I went back there, I

00:25:16 --> 00:25:20

argued with one or two Muslims that I was a Christian, I believe

00:25:20 --> 00:25:25

in Christianity. And but over time I discovered something I didn't

00:25:25 --> 00:25:28

because of my evangelical prejudice and dogma. It's

00:25:28 --> 00:25:31

embarrassing to say this now, but I'm sure this is true of many

00:25:31 --> 00:25:34

evangelicals. I actually discovered that Islam has an

00:25:34 --> 00:25:38

incredibly deep and rich spiritual tradition, which easily rivals

00:25:38 --> 00:25:40

that of Christianity, because I knew in Christianity we have

00:25:40 --> 00:25:44

Thomas Aquinas, Thomas, a Becket, Julian, at Norwich, the author of

00:25:44 --> 00:25:47

the Cloud of Unknowing, the amazing works of St. Augustine,

00:25:47 --> 00:25:52

etc, etc, that Islam has a parallels built tradition of equal

00:25:52 --> 00:25:56

profundity, but like much, much more of it's actually, I mean,

00:25:57 --> 00:25:59

even going to like Rumi and everything. You know, there's a

00:25:59 --> 00:26:02

huge tradition, which goes back many, many centuries. And this is

00:26:02 --> 00:26:05

really impressed me and I recognize commonalities and

00:26:05 --> 00:26:09

similarities between the two traditions, actually. And then I

00:26:09 --> 00:26:11

that kind of woke me up to a paradigm shift.

00:26:12 --> 00:26:18

Hang on, if if Christian mysticism or spirituality can speak

00:26:18 --> 00:26:22

profoundly of the nature of God and our lives, and Islam is doing

00:26:22 --> 00:26:25

something quite similar in many ways. Maybe there's a lot of truth

00:26:25 --> 00:26:26

of Islam.

00:26:28 --> 00:26:31

And then, and then I came across something which I didn't expect to

00:26:31 --> 00:26:34

find, which made the biggest impact on me, other than reading

00:26:34 --> 00:26:38

the Quran, was the life of the prophet Muhammad upon him up, I

00:26:38 --> 00:26:42

read the amazing Syrah by Martin lings. And that blew my mind and I

00:26:42 --> 00:26:46

thought, oh, okay, okay, okay. You know, he looks like a prophet

00:26:46 --> 00:26:48

talks, like a prophet speaks like a prophet behaves like a prophet.

00:26:49 --> 00:26:54

Why am I not believing he said, My God. And that was a revealing

00:26:54 --> 00:26:57

moment, then I encountered the problem within myself.

00:26:58 --> 00:27:02

I knew that if I accept that he was a prophet, that would mean I

00:27:02 --> 00:27:03

would become a Muslim.

00:27:06 --> 00:27:09

And that would mean a, a, an existential change of civilization

00:27:09 --> 00:27:14

or over cross over thresholds, red lines, in my own life, as a white

00:27:14 --> 00:27:19

male middle class, majoritarian person in England, moving a small,

00:27:19 --> 00:27:23

often despised ethnic minority community. And that made me hold

00:27:23 --> 00:27:26

back for some months and thinking, do I really do actually really

00:27:26 --> 00:27:30

want to do this at all? Because I'm quite comfortable where I am.

00:27:30 --> 00:27:31

Thank you very much.

00:27:32 --> 00:27:35

So Hamdulillah, I did ultimately get the courage by the grace of

00:27:35 --> 00:27:40

God to say the shahada at Regent's Park. So you're this story. It's

00:27:40 --> 00:27:45

very intellectual. It's, it's between you and books. More so

00:27:45 --> 00:27:49

then, you know, there was a kind man on the street and even like,

00:27:50 --> 00:27:52

big intellectuals like shit, no, Hamid Keller.

00:27:54 --> 00:27:59

He says that he was he was moved into Islam by three things. All of

00:27:59 --> 00:28:04

them were interactions one time one moment interactions with

00:28:04 --> 00:28:08

regular Muslims on the street. Like one per one woman saw he was

00:28:08 --> 00:28:12

so dusty and disheveled she and she was very poor. And she took

00:28:12 --> 00:28:14

money from her pocket and put in his hand, right?

00:28:15 --> 00:28:21

Things like that. So but yours seems to be between you and books

00:28:21 --> 00:28:24

and ideas, and you're thinking on your own? I think well, yeah.

00:28:24 --> 00:28:30

Books, I think, yes. It by that one means a deep engagement with

00:28:30 --> 00:28:34

truth. Yeah, I don't need to come across as a cerebral exercise. It

00:28:34 --> 00:28:38

wasn't hard. Don't get me wrong. But it wasn't just that it was a

00:28:38 --> 00:28:41

much deeper, transformative encounter with the truth,

00:28:42 --> 00:28:46

actually, and with the, the Great, the great. In fact, there's a book

00:28:46 --> 00:28:49

I read, and I've always always flogging this book. It's like the

00:28:49 --> 00:28:53

destiny of man by the English writer guide. And when I started

00:28:53 --> 00:28:57

to read that book, I was I was, I was a convinced Christian when I

00:28:57 --> 00:29:00

finished reading that book, I was a Muslim, in my heart,

00:29:02 --> 00:29:06

intellectually I hadn't. So it the way he communicated a profound

00:29:06 --> 00:29:09

understanding of Islamic spirituality of the life of the

00:29:09 --> 00:29:13

prophet in the Quran, and the and the Islamic worldview. Once I let

00:29:13 --> 00:29:16

that really impact me, it transformed me.

00:29:18 --> 00:29:22

So I wouldn't want buy a book conversion. See, as a bookish guy.

00:29:22 --> 00:29:26

It wasn't it was much deeper than that. You you're reading a lot.

00:29:27 --> 00:29:28

Are you a writer as well?

00:29:30 --> 00:29:31

Well, I I write tweets.

00:29:34 --> 00:29:37

Do you have an actual blog with essays?

00:29:38 --> 00:29:43

I have actually written essays. Yeah. So I don't tend to. I do.

00:29:43 --> 00:29:48

Yes. Okay. Yeah, I mean, I have written on some more academic

00:29:48 --> 00:29:50

stuff, but I don't tend to do a lot of that because a lot of my

00:29:50 --> 00:29:54

time is spent with interviewing real academics. So I feel that

00:29:54 --> 00:29:58

they should obviously be deferred to but yeah, I do occasionally

00:29:58 --> 00:29:59

write things when people enter

00:30:00 --> 00:30:05

Come and to Islam in our Masjid. I give them Abdel Halim you know,

00:30:05 --> 00:30:08

Professor Abdul Halim is maybe 10 minutes from you, right? What do

00:30:08 --> 00:30:12

you say to this which is the give them that because that is the

00:30:12 --> 00:30:14

easiest translation of the Quran to read.

00:30:16 --> 00:30:19

You know, I think this is the easiest now just want to clear the

00:30:19 --> 00:30:24

clear crown clear. We received we somebody sent us a whole box of

00:30:24 --> 00:30:26

those so we give them out now to

00:30:28 --> 00:30:30

you know what I don't give out though, and it bothers me to

00:30:30 --> 00:30:36

death. i We don't have a 100 page biography of the Prophet peace be

00:30:36 --> 00:30:41

upon him. Every biography of the Prophet is very long. Okay. Karen

00:30:41 --> 00:30:46

Armstrong's is a good biography to write, but it's not one of those

00:30:46 --> 00:30:51

that's readily available on Amazon. And I would like to give

00:30:51 --> 00:30:55

them a short biography. Now, you just said that one of your biggest

00:30:55 --> 00:31:01

turning points was the Sunnah of the Prophet peace be upon him. You

00:31:01 --> 00:31:06

are a convert, you know, your your your your people better than a

00:31:06 --> 00:31:10

born Muslim would know. What do you think of the idea of writing a

00:31:10 --> 00:31:13

100 page biography of the prophet for new Muslims?

00:31:15 --> 00:31:17

Well, I wasn't expecting that question.

00:31:19 --> 00:31:22

I'm not the person to do that. I'm not qualified to do that. I think

00:31:22 --> 00:31:25

a prerequisite on the corner Karen Armstrong doesn't have this

00:31:25 --> 00:31:28

prerequisite for this. She She's unusual. The prerequisite for

00:31:28 --> 00:31:32

writing a blog is doing a zero b knowledge of Arabic.

00:31:33 --> 00:31:36

And I think when I was in high school earlier this year, I read

00:31:36 --> 00:31:41

Dr. Yasser, cardies, new Sera, which is very accessible and

00:31:41 --> 00:31:44

readable. And so I just

00:31:46 --> 00:31:49

I'm not a page fetishist. I think I don't know why we had

00:31:50 --> 00:31:53

this. Yeah, but you see, I mean, it all depends how big the font

00:31:53 --> 00:31:56

is, and how thick the pages are. How many words I mean, that's

00:31:56 --> 00:31:59

deceptive. You can shrink the pages and by changing the fonts

00:31:59 --> 00:32:04

and the font size, so true. I think we have now just my personal

00:32:04 --> 00:32:07

opinion, I think now in English, we have an abundance of Syrah of

00:32:07 --> 00:32:11

excellent quality. And I'm also against just having one standard

00:32:11 --> 00:32:14

Syrah. I think it has to be because there is such a choice.

00:32:14 --> 00:32:19

Now, if I had a quite a quite an educated English lady or

00:32:19 --> 00:32:24

gentleman. Yeah, I'd recommend Martin lings. I just won't forget

00:32:24 --> 00:32:27

all the others, however good. Because of the standard of

00:32:27 --> 00:32:30

language, the eloquence the beauty of the language, we find it

00:32:30 --> 00:32:33

enlightening, but I wouldn't recommend that to a lot of other

00:32:33 --> 00:32:35

people because it is quite challenging to read if you're not

00:32:35 --> 00:32:36

used to that kind of

00:32:37 --> 00:32:42

old fashioned if I can use that word English. So yes, I carry a

00:32:42 --> 00:32:45

much more wider audience, I think, much more demotic.

00:32:46 --> 00:32:49

And Karen Armstrong again, but you've had a Christian I would say

00:32:49 --> 00:32:52

recurrent arms because she's not a Muslim, and yet managed to convey

00:32:52 --> 00:32:55

successfully an awful lot of facts and truth about the Prophet in a

00:32:55 --> 00:32:58

way that isn't prejudice and agree with everything she says one or

00:32:58 --> 00:33:00

two bits where she gets a bit anyway, but she's very, very good.

00:33:01 --> 00:33:04

So it depends on who one is speaking to in terms of

00:33:04 --> 00:33:09

recommending a particular sera Do you see non Muslims and Christians

00:33:09 --> 00:33:14

now and an ever have a in person Dawa type of a relationship with

00:33:14 --> 00:33:19

them? Yeah, all the time? And where would where's the where's

00:33:19 --> 00:33:21

the platform for that? Is it like a Speaker's Corner thing? Or?

00:33:22 --> 00:33:24

Yeah, I mean, last Sunday, a couple days ago, I had a long

00:33:24 --> 00:33:27

conversation which was filmed you can see it on YouTube with a, an

00:33:27 --> 00:33:28

American missionary.

00:33:30 --> 00:33:30

And,

00:33:31 --> 00:33:35

and that was difficult for me, because the How can I put the the

00:33:35 --> 00:33:39

asymmetry in knowledge between the two was pretty extreme.

00:33:40 --> 00:33:43

But you can make up your own mind what happened there? And then

00:33:43 --> 00:33:48

another American from California, who says he's a fan of blogging

00:33:48 --> 00:33:51

theology, you says, I'm not sure I believe him. Really. They said he

00:33:51 --> 00:33:52

came to them just to meet me.

00:33:53 --> 00:33:59

I don't and because anyway, he was very different. He was very

00:33:59 --> 00:34:04

intelligent, very respectful. And patient. I was his, I was very

00:34:04 --> 00:34:07

happy to talk to him indeed, and we did for an hour or so. That's

00:34:07 --> 00:34:10

also on YouTube from last Sunday.

00:34:11 --> 00:34:15

And his questions were much more scholarly and technical. And I

00:34:15 --> 00:34:18

find this much more interesting actually. A lot of people have us

00:34:18 --> 00:34:21

in the data world in the YouTube world will know about Speaker's

00:34:21 --> 00:34:25

Corner. But can you tell those who don't? What is Speaker's Corner

00:34:25 --> 00:34:27

and whites has a role in Dawa?

00:34:28 --> 00:34:32

Gosh, that's a good yes, indeed. It does, actually, for good or

00:34:32 --> 00:34:37

ill. So, Speaker's Corner, so called is in London in England,

00:34:37 --> 00:34:41

and it's part of a park a public park called Hyde Park that

00:34:41 --> 00:34:44

literally a mile from where I'm sitting, it takes me 20 minutes to

00:34:44 --> 00:34:46

walk down there, which is why it's so easy for me just to get down

00:34:46 --> 00:34:49

there on a Sunday only meets on one day, a week on a Sunday.

00:34:50 --> 00:34:53

And it's not there because the park authorities are being nice or

00:34:53 --> 00:34:57

the police want you to turn up or anyone is there by law in the 19th

00:34:57 --> 00:34:59

century, during the convulsions

00:35:00 --> 00:35:00

of

00:35:02 --> 00:35:04

when the trade union movement was was beginning in England,

00:35:06 --> 00:35:09

many militant workers were struggling for their rights and

00:35:09 --> 00:35:15

recognition and social justice demonstrated in this park. And and

00:35:15 --> 00:35:18

at the beginning, they were quite brutally suppressed by the police.

00:35:19 --> 00:35:23

So the government is parliament decided to pass a law to set aside

00:35:23 --> 00:35:27

that area of the park, where speakers could actually speak with

00:35:27 --> 00:35:30

with complete freedom without the police arresting them without

00:35:30 --> 00:35:34

anyone interfering. So it's actually there by statute. So the

00:35:34 --> 00:35:36

police can't close it down or anything special except for

00:35:36 --> 00:35:40

really, really good reasons. Like during COVID. Sadie was closed

00:35:40 --> 00:35:44

briefly. So so people are going there, obviously, if he is Karl

00:35:44 --> 00:35:50

Marx went there. Oswald Mosley went there, who else? George

00:35:50 --> 00:35:54

Orwell, the famous writer went there. Lots of very famous people

00:35:54 --> 00:35:56

Lenin went there. Actually, he's on record. He lived in London for

00:35:56 --> 00:35:59

a while. And when speakers go on, you hear Lenin's Can you imagine?

00:36:01 --> 00:36:04

So, but in recent years, it's become because of the local

00:36:04 --> 00:36:08

demography and other reasons is we can quite heavily Muslim and put

00:36:08 --> 00:36:12

it that way. And also, with the advent of social media and

00:36:12 --> 00:36:17

cameras, and iPhones, like my, you know, people have started to

00:36:17 --> 00:36:23

upload recordings of their and now I'm told in the world, but you

00:36:23 --> 00:36:26

know, there are hundreds of millions of people who have

00:36:26 --> 00:36:30

watched videos, they're translated into subtitles into Arabic.

00:36:31 --> 00:36:36

And it's made celebrities like Shamsi, the the Salafi speaker is

00:36:36 --> 00:36:39

very, very well known. I can go a long, long list of people that

00:36:39 --> 00:36:42

whether it be Muhammad hijab, or you know, who'd been there and

00:36:42 --> 00:36:43

still go there, actually.

00:36:44 --> 00:36:49

But I would say, mainly, I would say it's toxic, I would say

00:36:49 --> 00:36:56

mainly, it's bad, because there's often not much positive discourse

00:36:56 --> 00:37:00

going on, let alone down. Or often it can be quite, particularly with

00:37:00 --> 00:37:02

some of the, some of the Christians there are

00:37:03 --> 00:37:08

a very, very extreme, and they will insult the Prophet and so on.

00:37:08 --> 00:37:11

So you really have to be tough skinned, and not take offense, at

00:37:11 --> 00:37:17

least not react anyway. Because it's protected by law. So how does

00:37:17 --> 00:37:22

this work? Exactly? So like from as soon as the daylight is up,

00:37:23 --> 00:37:27

people start going there randomly, and picking a corner and taking an

00:37:27 --> 00:37:31

area and making it there's and speaking? Yeah, it's just a corner

00:37:31 --> 00:37:35

of the park. So there's no like gate or entrance fee or a

00:37:35 --> 00:37:38

policeman saying, Hey, we started. It takes place on Sunday by

00:37:38 --> 00:37:42

tradition. So people just turn up at some point on Monday could turn

00:37:42 --> 00:37:45

up before the thing is, if you turn up before dawn on us day, you

00:37:45 --> 00:37:48

could do that. But I wouldn't imagine that anyone would be

00:37:48 --> 00:37:51

there. So it usually turn off about two to three o'clock in the

00:37:51 --> 00:37:55

afternoon when you get most people have arrived. And then because I

00:37:55 --> 00:37:58

have a number of friends there who I just like to chat to anyway, so

00:37:58 --> 00:38:03

there's social sites. And like this one, they just gone. I met to

00:38:03 --> 00:38:04

American.

00:38:05 --> 00:38:09

One was a mission. The other one was an Enquirer. And particularly

00:38:09 --> 00:38:11

that I hear people approached me.

00:38:12 --> 00:38:17

And sometimes I you know, listen, as well to discussions or debates.

00:38:18 --> 00:38:22

And you can you can learn there can be some quite good debates and

00:38:22 --> 00:38:27

discussion sometimes. Do you see shadows around there? No, no, I

00:38:27 --> 00:38:31

would say that's quite rare. Ironically, there's a lot of work

00:38:31 --> 00:38:36

going on on the streets of London, actually an awful lot. And I can

00:38:36 --> 00:38:40

tell you, because I've seen it myself many times. It is hugely

00:38:40 --> 00:38:44

successful. I mean, just up the road from here about a mile north

00:38:44 --> 00:38:48

in Kilburn, there's $1 store that you're going for years, you get

00:38:48 --> 00:38:50

numerous shahada every

00:38:51 --> 00:38:54

it's amazing, actually, just on the general public, the Speaker's

00:38:54 --> 00:38:57

Corner is different. And I think it's because it's such a toxic

00:38:57 --> 00:39:01

toxic atmosphere, you can't really have it's very difficult to have a

00:39:01 --> 00:39:05

good heart to heart and authentic interact, you're human, you're

00:39:05 --> 00:39:08

there to, you know, refute the missionaries. The missionaries are

00:39:08 --> 00:39:12

there to destroy Islam or whatever, you know, it is not the

00:39:12 --> 00:39:17

right place. And are they there so there's no prayer there so there's

00:39:17 --> 00:39:20

no Christian group that setting that's praying and you get to

00:39:20 --> 00:39:23

witness their prayer and and a Muslim group witnessing their

00:39:23 --> 00:39:27

prayer that doesn't exist. It doesn't know a prayer Krishna said

00:39:28 --> 00:39:32

Muslims do pray in pray Salah then CONGREGATION But there's an area

00:39:32 --> 00:39:35

very very very close to it where the police have said you know, you

00:39:36 --> 00:39:40

you're not supposed to pray in the Speaker's Corner because because a

00:39:40 --> 00:39:44

huge part you can pay anywhere but it because it kind of interferes

00:39:44 --> 00:39:48

with the smooth running of Speaker's Corner. I see. Good now

00:39:48 --> 00:39:52

let's get to your YouTube channel. How many interviews are you on

00:39:52 --> 00:39:56

right now? What what number of interviews is the next idea? I

00:39:56 --> 00:40:00

have no idea. It's nearly 1000 videos. I already am

00:40:00 --> 00:40:04

Imagine I'd have a rough guess about half of those, probably more

00:40:04 --> 00:40:08

than half are actual videos I used to do. So you started with the

00:40:08 --> 00:40:12

Christian scholars. What was your first Muslim interview?

00:40:13 --> 00:40:17

Gosh, do you know I don't know the answer to that I'd need to check.

00:40:19 --> 00:40:24

I mean, I can check now but I, I don't remember I'm just scrolling

00:40:24 --> 00:40:28

through my old stuff now and just trying to find an answer but I

00:40:28 --> 00:40:30

don't know the answer that no problem.

00:40:31 --> 00:40:37

So, Alia Thai as your video here, Alia Thai discusses Isaiah 53. And

00:40:37 --> 00:40:41

James and Paul, that was two years ago. Oh, wow. He might even have

00:40:41 --> 00:40:45

the truth about selfies revealed I interviewed a Saudi Sheikh Hassan

00:40:45 --> 00:40:48

Somali is actually an American who lives in the state of

00:40:48 --> 00:40:49

Pennsylvania.

00:40:50 --> 00:40:52

But although he's actually British originally,

00:40:53 --> 00:40:56

Alia tied before I think Alia tie was the earliest.

00:40:57 --> 00:41:01

Surprisingly, so some of these, some of these interviews are

00:41:01 --> 00:41:06

actually our Sorry, sorry, some of your videos are not interviews.

00:41:06 --> 00:41:09

They're like compilations that you made,

00:41:10 --> 00:41:14

like Deputy Mayor of Jerusalem calls for genocide. When I click

00:41:14 --> 00:41:18

on that, I'm gonna get like a compilation and your commentary.

00:41:19 --> 00:41:23

Yes. Oh, yeah, I do. Yeah, there are several kinds of categories of

00:41:23 --> 00:41:27

thing of stuff work that I do that has evolved naturally, organically

00:41:27 --> 00:41:31

over the last two, two years. And so obviously, there's setpiece

00:41:31 --> 00:41:36

interviews, which I really liked. And then the other Another

00:41:36 --> 00:41:36

category is

00:41:38 --> 00:41:43

kind of my own social commentary. So if an event happens, or like

00:41:43 --> 00:41:47

you mentioned, I will try and think of that I feel it I actually

00:41:47 --> 00:41:48

want to comment on

00:41:50 --> 00:41:54

and they usually much shorter, say 20 minutes, half an hour. Yep.

00:41:54 --> 00:41:58

Very good. If you're on Instagram, or, or you're just joining us on

00:41:58 --> 00:42:02

YouTube, our guest is Paul Williams, out of London, he runs a

00:42:02 --> 00:42:06

website, a YouTube channel called blogging theology, where he has

00:42:06 --> 00:42:10

interviewed numerous numerous Christian and Muslim scholars and

00:42:10 --> 00:42:14

he has clips, he's got a very, very successful YouTube channel.

00:42:14 --> 00:42:17

And he's also has a very successful

00:42:18 --> 00:42:21

Twitter handle. So check it out at blogging theology, or at Paul

00:42:21 --> 00:42:25

Williams, free monotheist on Twitter. Eric, your Twitter handle

00:42:25 --> 00:42:28

is called Three monotheists. His channel on YouTube is called

00:42:29 --> 00:42:32

blogging, theology. If you're on Instagram, hop over to YouTube, so

00:42:32 --> 00:42:36

you can see the full picture. Let me ask you this question. What is

00:42:36 --> 00:42:41

your criterion when you invite one of your guests? What's the

00:42:41 --> 00:42:44

criteria in there? What's the thought pattern behind that? It

00:42:44 --> 00:42:47

depends on the guest, I have a number of guests handlers that I

00:42:47 --> 00:42:51

see regularly now not advertised one of them. So we're in contact

00:42:51 --> 00:42:54

on WhatsApp. And, you know, he may come up with an idea or I might

00:42:54 --> 00:42:58

invite him on discuss a particular subject. And Dr. Louis for too is

00:42:58 --> 00:43:03

another one. There's kind of a group of of people who kindly come

00:43:03 --> 00:43:04

on periodically, at least.

00:43:06 --> 00:43:10

But other than that, perhaps a bigger source is my own reading.

00:43:10 --> 00:43:15

So, you know, I come across authors and books that I've really

00:43:15 --> 00:43:17

appreciated and would love to speak to the author of those 10

00:43:17 --> 00:43:22

books. So I just simply email them and say, Can you join me Come on?

00:43:22 --> 00:43:25

And the other time they say yes, some of the time they say no,

00:43:26 --> 00:43:28

you've had earlier today, you had a lot of Muslims, obviously,

00:43:28 --> 00:43:30

you've had discussed

00:43:32 --> 00:43:35

a lot of biblical things with him. Judaism with him. Have you had any

00:43:35 --> 00:43:42

rabbis on? Yes. Just when I had to actually Rabbi Toby, a singer, who

00:43:42 --> 00:43:46

is based in Jerusalem now. He has been hugely popular amongst

00:43:46 --> 00:43:50

Muslims. He is, is another genius when it comes to

00:43:51 --> 00:43:53

dealing with Christian missionaries. And their

00:43:53 --> 00:43:55

misrepresentations of the Torah

00:43:56 --> 00:44:00

was a genius. I mean, he's not only technically masterful with

00:44:00 --> 00:44:04

Hebrew, but his ability to communicate clearly. And

00:44:04 --> 00:44:08

intelligently on issues is very, very special. So yeah, I had him

00:44:08 --> 00:44:12

on. And there's another academic in New York, a professor that

00:44:12 --> 00:44:16

whose embarrassingly name I can't remember, I had him on once a

00:44:16 --> 00:44:16

couple of years ago,

00:44:18 --> 00:44:23

that he's a proper academic who discussed Judaism. There is a

00:44:23 --> 00:44:28

Hasidic Jewish rabbi, from the Satmar. You're familiar if you're

00:44:28 --> 00:44:31

enough for those not familiar with the Satmar Jews, they live in

00:44:31 --> 00:44:36

Williamsburg in Brooklyn. And they're very insular. They don't.

00:44:36 --> 00:44:39

They don't engage a lot in the world, but they're also very

00:44:39 --> 00:44:44

deeply anti Zionist, and they believe the entire project of

00:44:44 --> 00:44:48

Israel is sinful, and has nothing to do with Judaism and is a

00:44:48 --> 00:44:53

hijacking of Zionism. This is based upon their, the ancient or

00:44:53 --> 00:44:57

not an ancient, I should say, the, maybe three generations ago there.

00:44:57 --> 00:44:59

Rabbi Teitelbaum from Austria.

00:45:00 --> 00:45:06

Who, who had this belief? They came to to Williamsburg in

00:45:06 --> 00:45:11

Brooklyn, after the Holocaust, and they set up shop here. We're

00:45:11 --> 00:45:13

trying to interview somebody, I think you would also

00:45:15 --> 00:45:19

love to talk to him. If you watch the videos of Jakob Shapiro. He's

00:45:19 --> 00:45:23

one of the most thoughtful rabbis he communicates excellently. And

00:45:23 --> 00:45:29

he's from the Satmar tradition. And he distills and explains very

00:45:29 --> 00:45:35

clearly. Why is it that these Jews feel that Zionism is in fact,

00:45:35 --> 00:45:40

against the Torah? And is it sinful in its nature? Exactly. And

00:45:40 --> 00:45:42

in fact, it remains historical facts I mean, Alia Thai has

00:45:42 --> 00:45:47

mentioned quite correctly is that until relatively recently, far,

00:45:47 --> 00:45:52

the vast majority of Orthodox Jews were auto, also anti Zionist. It's

00:45:52 --> 00:45:55

relatively recently that there's been this huge conversion amongst

00:45:55 --> 00:45:59

Jews, generally to be very militantly pros. That is, wasn't

00:45:59 --> 00:46:06

the case. It was a heresy as a false idea by most Jews. And so

00:46:06 --> 00:46:09

that because once you were obviously once the State of Israel

00:46:09 --> 00:46:13

was founded, and so on, and after that, things began to change. But

00:46:13 --> 00:46:16

the the idea itself was seen as completely and Jewish. If you

00:46:16 --> 00:46:21

imagine, to bring this closer to Muslims, imagine if the whatever

00:46:21 --> 00:46:23

the reformed, progressive

00:46:24 --> 00:46:27

or Muslim organization out there, or that group of people, these

00:46:27 --> 00:46:31

like totally reformed, totally progressive Muslims. They're not

00:46:31 --> 00:46:33

that many, but they make a lot of noise online. They seem to

00:46:33 --> 00:46:36

disappear every once in a while in England itself. You had

00:46:38 --> 00:46:41

Quilliam Foundation, what a Muslim organization, but they were

00:46:41 --> 00:46:45

dominantly very liberal, very, very liberal, and they all

00:46:45 --> 00:46:48

disappeared. In fact, one of them actually made Toba and is now

00:46:48 --> 00:46:52

Alexa Bundy in Malaysia. Right, which is good for him. Yeah,

00:46:52 --> 00:46:59

what's his name? The Pakistani gentleman, what was his name? I

00:46:59 --> 00:47:01

can't remember his name. He was very provocative, extremely

00:47:01 --> 00:47:05

provocative, right? Liberal, but he's made Toba to Allah He as a

00:47:05 --> 00:47:09

chef now and he's he's an extra Bundy in Indonesia and Malaysia.

00:47:09 --> 00:47:12

So that's good for him. The other is they disappear? They always

00:47:12 --> 00:47:14

disappear in Islam. But let's say hypothetically, they do, don't

00:47:14 --> 00:47:16

they? It's really odd. Yeah, that was disappear.

00:47:18 --> 00:47:21

Imagine those people set up a state

00:47:22 --> 00:47:25

and it called it, you know, dawdle, Islam?

00:47:26 --> 00:47:30

And not like we need one right, but just hypothetically, not. I'm

00:47:30 --> 00:47:33

saying that most there are tons of Muslim countries already. But

00:47:33 --> 00:47:37

hypothetically, they set up this is going to be a land where our

00:47:37 --> 00:47:40

chief goal is Islam, which of course is wonderful idea. Right?

00:47:41 --> 00:47:43

When I say I don't need one. I mean, like, we have so many

00:47:43 --> 00:47:46

countries not that such a country wouldn't be a great idea. But

00:47:46 --> 00:47:52

imagine this type of idealistic Muslim nation was but it was run

00:47:52 --> 00:47:58

by reforms, reformed Muslims, okay, these liberal types, your

00:47:58 --> 00:48:01

average Muslim and your average Imam and shit, they dismiss it

00:48:01 --> 00:48:06

outright, right. And this is exactly what's happening. With a

00:48:06 --> 00:48:13

lot of rabbis, in the earlier times, probably fewer now. But the

00:48:13 --> 00:48:18

bulk of rabbis, the Satmar types, the matura carta types, which are

00:48:18 --> 00:48:22

they're a little bit more extreme even. And people disagree with

00:48:22 --> 00:48:27

their activism, rabbis, Jews themselves, but even anti Zionist

00:48:27 --> 00:48:31

Jews disagree with their activism. But nonetheless, that used to be

00:48:31 --> 00:48:35

the main mainstream position is that this whole thing is sinful,

00:48:36 --> 00:48:39

as against the Torah. Yeah, that's true. Yeah. So I recommend you

00:48:39 --> 00:48:43

check out check out Yakov Shapiro. Thank you, you're gonna love his

00:48:43 --> 00:48:46

work. Right. You're gonna love his lectures, you know, who had him on

00:48:46 --> 00:48:49

is the deen show, Eddie from the deen show. All right. Yeah, he had

00:48:49 --> 00:48:52

him on. You had him on. All right. Now, I want to ask you about some

00:48:52 --> 00:48:55

converts that you had. And you interviewed Muhammad killer.

00:48:57 --> 00:49:02

Muhammad killer is tell us about him a bit. Age of crisis. Yep. Let

00:49:02 --> 00:49:06

me just turn around here. I'm looking for the book. There we go.

00:49:06 --> 00:49:07

USA somewhere.

00:49:08 --> 00:49:13

We thinking Islam and the West, a new, a new narrative for the age

00:49:13 --> 00:49:16

of crises. Not not a very,

00:49:17 --> 00:49:20

you know, doesn't draw me in that title. But when I actually read

00:49:20 --> 00:49:24

the book, I really appreciated the fantastic book. And I had the

00:49:24 --> 00:49:27

privilege of interviewing him at Cambridge University on that you

00:49:27 --> 00:49:28

can see on the channel,

00:49:29 --> 00:49:32

and a very important work and you recommend it without going into

00:49:32 --> 00:49:37

all the details, but he, he knows his stuff. And he does offer a

00:49:37 --> 00:49:43

profound paradigm than design paradigm for, you know, a vision

00:49:43 --> 00:49:47

to pursue if you like, and what was his claim to fame? Was he a

00:49:47 --> 00:49:51

diplomat or No, no, that was great. And he was a diplomat. He

00:49:51 --> 00:49:56

was a visiting fellow at Cambridge University. So I was a professor,

00:49:56 --> 00:49:58

okay. No, fellow.

00:49:59 --> 00:49:59

pedantic Nope.

00:50:00 --> 00:50:07

and close. Yeah. All right. So we do you do you have an episode that

00:50:07 --> 00:50:10

sticks out in your mind the most from one of your interviews? No,

00:50:10 --> 00:50:13

you said there's so many jewels if I say so it's not because of me,

00:50:13 --> 00:50:17

because of the guests. It's difficult to have one that sticks

00:50:17 --> 00:50:20

out the most. But there are there are some, I think, rightly,

00:50:21 --> 00:50:24

very significant, one or two videos, actually which raise

00:50:24 --> 00:50:30

eyebrows. And one of them it features a guy called Keith Ward,

00:50:31 --> 00:50:36

who's a Church of England priest, also happens to be a professor of

00:50:37 --> 00:50:40

Christians Theology at Oxford University, and it was a

00:50:40 --> 00:50:43

philosopher. He's also probably Britain's most senior Christian

00:50:43 --> 00:50:47

theologian, very famous, hugely accomplished, written more books,

00:50:47 --> 00:50:51

and I've had hot dinners. A great guy, and I've had him on several

00:50:51 --> 00:50:54

times, bless him has been a great privilege to talk to him. Anyway,

00:50:54 --> 00:50:57

when I first I've been reading his stuff ever since I was a

00:50:57 --> 00:51:00

Christian. Actually, I was familiar with his work. And that's

00:51:00 --> 00:51:03

why I invited him on, because I wanted to talk to him about and

00:51:03 --> 00:51:06

lots of questions. So I invited him on He graciously came on. Now

00:51:06 --> 00:51:10

I already knew because of the kind, I knew from his books that

00:51:10 --> 00:51:14

he actually did believe that Mohammed upon MVPs was a prophet.

00:51:14 --> 00:51:20

I knew that he was a bit pluralist. So Nevertheless, I he's

00:51:20 --> 00:51:23

such a great guy, and I he's an idealist in philosophy, philosophy

00:51:23 --> 00:51:27

is an idealist. So that's a technical term in philosophy, you

00:51:27 --> 00:51:29

know, following Bishop Berkeley and others, and I really wanted to

00:51:29 --> 00:51:33

talk to him. Anyway, he came on, and I asked him the question, do

00:51:33 --> 00:51:37

you think Muhammad, the prophet of God, he said, Yes. And, and then I

00:51:37 --> 00:51:43

had the thought, I'm not sure. Why do your colleagues by which I met,

00:51:43 --> 00:51:45

of course, his Christian philosopher, colleagues, and

00:51:45 --> 00:51:48

Christian theologian, colleagues, what do they think? And I thought,

00:51:48 --> 00:51:50

the interesting to know how many of those might be sympathetic or

00:51:50 --> 00:51:54

not to Islam? He said, Oh, no, that they all are virtually all of

00:51:54 --> 00:51:57

them think he's a prophet? Wow. I thought, what.

00:51:59 --> 00:52:03

And I just suppress my reaction, because it was such a startling

00:52:03 --> 00:52:04

thing for him to say,

00:52:05 --> 00:52:09

and such a significant thing to say, because what it meant is that

00:52:09 --> 00:52:13

if I can put it this way that the Christian Allama in the West have

00:52:13 --> 00:52:18

conceded the point Subhan Allah, Islam is from God, that Muhammad

00:52:18 --> 00:52:20

was sent by God.

00:52:22 --> 00:52:26

You know, we've had, what, 1400 years of civilizational conflict

00:52:26 --> 00:52:30

or tension, where the West has insisted, it's it's right. And so,

00:52:30 --> 00:52:33

but they're their own intelligence, you have now

00:52:33 --> 00:52:36

accepted that Islam was right. That's right, the power will be as

00:52:36 --> 00:52:40

if the Saudi almost suddenly decided that Jesus was crucified

00:52:41 --> 00:52:46

for their sins. Exactly. Sir, that would never happen. But so that

00:52:46 --> 00:52:50

was extraordinary. And you can't question what he says he is, you

00:52:50 --> 00:52:52

know, he's actually a religious professor, you get ordinary

00:52:52 --> 00:52:55

professors. And then you get the elite professors who are appointed

00:52:55 --> 00:52:59

directly by the king or the queen, in his case, who are called Regis

00:52:59 --> 00:53:04

professors. So he is a very senior academic. And so in other words,

00:53:04 --> 00:53:08

he knows everyone in the field. So he is able to make that up. And no

00:53:08 --> 00:53:11

one's ever contradicts it. No one's texted me or written to me

00:53:11 --> 00:53:15

saying the boys and right. So the question is the two questions. Why

00:53:15 --> 00:53:19

do they say this? And secondly, why isn't he a Muslim? Yeah, I

00:53:19 --> 00:53:23

asked him this. But why do they think this because these guys,

00:53:23 --> 00:53:26

when you get to know them a bit to their work, most of them are very

00:53:26 --> 00:53:30

honest. I mean, they are real scholars, you don't get to be an

00:53:30 --> 00:53:32

Oxford professor, unless you have something going for you.

00:53:33 --> 00:53:36

They looked at the other other religions, often that Islam or

00:53:36 --> 00:53:40

Hinduism or Judaism, and you know, they've read the texts and

00:53:40 --> 00:53:43

responsibles. And they have seen the likeness they've they know

00:53:43 --> 00:53:47

about Moses, they also know about Mohammed, and they can see how

00:53:47 --> 00:53:52

similar they are. And they are of the same type. They both come from

00:53:52 --> 00:53:55

the same place, arguably. So yeah, they get it because they're

00:53:55 --> 00:53:59

experts on it. So that's why I think they will get is because

00:53:59 --> 00:54:02

they've looked at the evidence. Why they're not Muslims is a much

00:54:02 --> 00:54:06

more complicated, dark question. I don't have an I asked Professor

00:54:06 --> 00:54:10

Keith. Well, why and he gave his answer I didn't really understand

00:54:10 --> 00:54:12

it has to do with, well, I've been brought up in this tradition, and

00:54:12 --> 00:54:16

it's fine. It's a way to God and I recognize Islam as a way to God

00:54:16 --> 00:54:20

didn't I mean, you know, hey, that's his answer. But yeah,

00:54:20 --> 00:54:24

that's usually the one way to go about it. I'm having a discussion

00:54:24 --> 00:54:27

with with the Christian gentleman right now.

00:54:28 --> 00:54:30

And I really basically said to him, Look,

00:54:32 --> 00:54:36

I'm a simple guy, hypothetical. I just, I'm a born Muslim, and I

00:54:36 --> 00:54:38

follow the Prophet peace be upon him.

00:54:40 --> 00:54:43

All I want to know is if I continue in this for the rest of

00:54:43 --> 00:54:47

my life, and I meet God, okay. Is he going to be pleased with my

00:54:47 --> 00:54:50

decision to follow the Prophet? Or am I going to be in trouble? Am I

00:54:50 --> 00:54:53

going to find myself in trouble with God at the end of the day

00:54:54 --> 00:54:55

with this decision?

00:54:56 --> 00:54:59

And I'm asking him in his theology like in your

00:55:00 --> 00:55:04

Christian belief. Am I wrong about this? Ultimately, at the end of

00:55:04 --> 00:55:07

the day, he had to admit that

00:55:08 --> 00:55:11

God doesn't punish you if you make the wrong decision.

00:55:13 --> 00:55:17

At that point, well, then what is the purpose of being right then?

00:55:18 --> 00:55:23

Right? Like, if the wrong if making the wrong decision, if the

00:55:23 --> 00:55:28

wrong answer doesn't get you, right marked wrong, why do I

00:55:28 --> 00:55:31

study? What's the point of anything? What's the point of the

00:55:31 --> 00:55:34

whole class? If marking the answer is wrong on the exam?

00:55:36 --> 00:55:41

So does he represent the evangelical view correctly, that

00:55:42 --> 00:55:47

there is no clear cut line that God says if you follow any prophet

00:55:47 --> 00:55:50

after Jesus, you will be in trouble with me on the day of

00:55:50 --> 00:55:52

judgment he gave a joke would never agree with that. They would

00:55:52 --> 00:55:56

always say if you Yeah, they would say that Jesus was the final last

00:55:56 --> 00:56:00

prophet. Even though he said in Matthew's Gospel, Matthew 15, have

00:56:00 --> 00:56:03

already been sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And

00:56:03 --> 00:56:06

according to Matthew called a Gentile woman, a dog, a Canaanite

00:56:06 --> 00:56:09

woman. So imagine 15, if you are not familiar with it, I'm not

00:56:09 --> 00:56:11

saying this historical, by the way, a lot in the gospels we now

00:56:11 --> 00:56:13

know is not historical. But nevertheless, you know, he is

00:56:13 --> 00:56:17

presented as someone who's only sent to the Jews in that regard, I

00:56:17 --> 00:56:20

think is historical, why it makes sense of historical context. And

00:56:20 --> 00:56:23

the crown confirms that. But certainly for evangelicals, if you

00:56:23 --> 00:56:26

follow Muhammad, you began to hellfire. Absolutely.

00:56:27 --> 00:56:32

These days, I really want to engage with others, right? I see

00:56:32 --> 00:56:37

that this war has actually caused so many people to be talking about

00:56:38 --> 00:56:40

things that we're interested in, they're talking about Judaism,

00:56:40 --> 00:56:43

they're talking about Christianity to talk about Islam, Christianity,

00:56:43 --> 00:56:47

in the sense of Christian Zionism, the Christians are very amped up

00:56:47 --> 00:56:48

about Israel,

00:56:49 --> 00:56:53

Islam and Muslims are is constantly in the forefront. So

00:56:53 --> 00:56:56

I'm taking this an opportunity to talk and I talked to a lot of

00:56:57 --> 00:57:00

a lot of Christians and a lot of right wingers, usually deep in

00:57:00 --> 00:57:05

their threads on Twitter. What's your advice on how to interact

00:57:05 --> 00:57:09

with those types of Christians? Mainly evangelicals, mainly very

00:57:09 --> 00:57:13

worried about immigration and things like that? What's your

00:57:13 --> 00:57:17

advice on how to interact with them? My advice would not be to

00:57:17 --> 00:57:21

interact with them on Twitter. It's, it's not really the right

00:57:21 --> 00:57:22

the right forum for

00:57:24 --> 00:57:28

decent interaction, you know, human, compassionate, intelligent,

00:57:29 --> 00:57:31

because so much communication between individuals or human

00:57:31 --> 00:57:37

beings is nonverbal. And Twitter is a highly kind of selective, a

00:57:37 --> 00:57:41

slice of reality that is easily amenable to you know, so there's a

00:57:41 --> 00:57:46

terrible medium for that. Yeah. But I think the key thing is to

00:57:46 --> 00:57:51

show I know it might sound very basic, but many, many people are I

00:57:51 --> 00:57:55

had certainly in the past forgotten basic principles, which

00:57:55 --> 00:57:59

I should have remembered and try and remember now. Yeah. And when

00:57:59 --> 00:58:01

talking to evangelicals, I used to do some very, very silly what I'm

00:58:01 --> 00:58:04

about to say, but I really believe in this. The first thing is be

00:58:04 --> 00:58:09

polite. Actually, I've seen some Muslims, not many, thank goodness,

00:58:09 --> 00:58:12

but some of them just go in there and attack people Christians.

00:58:12 --> 00:58:15

Know, be polite, say, Hello, introduce, give you give them your

00:58:15 --> 00:58:18

name. I know this sounds very basic, but it's surprising how

00:58:18 --> 00:58:23

often I forgot to do that. So be polite, and at least try and

00:58:23 --> 00:58:25

listen to what they're saying. Even though you may be repellent

00:58:25 --> 00:58:29

or completely wrong. And so you know, maintain the eye contact,

00:58:29 --> 00:58:32

try and show them some respect, because they're human beings after

00:58:32 --> 00:58:36

all, and because often what wins people over is not me. I mean,

00:58:36 --> 00:58:38

this is gonna sound extremely arrogant, is arrogant. I'm gonna

00:58:38 --> 00:58:42

say anyway, my regret saying this is easy for me to win an argument

00:58:42 --> 00:58:45

with a Christian, usually, it's not difficult, you know, I know

00:58:45 --> 00:58:49

the Bible better than they do. Just a fact. I just noticed that

00:58:49 --> 00:58:52

the average Christian, not professor from Oxford, but I can

00:58:52 --> 00:58:56

win an argument and lose the person just as easily. You know,

00:58:56 --> 00:58:59

winning the person over is absolutely a different thing

00:58:59 --> 00:59:02

entirely. So winning the intellectual argument is nothing

00:59:02 --> 00:59:06

doesn't matter. really doesn't matter. Doesn't matter what proofs

00:59:06 --> 00:59:09

I come up with arguments, what Biblical verses what facts is

00:59:09 --> 00:59:13

irrelevant. If I attack that person, they get defensive, and

00:59:13 --> 00:59:16

then they retort with some ridiculous statement. And we

00:59:16 --> 00:59:19

become alienated over. So I've done that. I've been there and I

00:59:19 --> 00:59:23

behave like that a number of times. I try and avoid that

00:59:23 --> 00:59:28

because it's bad. Oh, the other thing was, you know, as well as

00:59:28 --> 00:59:32

better than I is that our job is not to convert anyone. It's God

00:59:32 --> 00:59:37

who changes hearts. And so we must move away from the responsibility

00:59:37 --> 00:59:40

the sense of responsibility that I must convert this person. Yeah.

00:59:41 --> 00:59:44

You know, that's not our job. It's not even job was may think it's

00:59:44 --> 00:59:47

their job for them, but it's not our job. Our job is to retain

00:59:48 --> 00:59:53

knowledge, facts, and then leave the rest of God and gobble.

00:59:53 --> 00:59:58

Convert them if you want. Yep. Let's take three questions.

00:59:58 --> 00:59:59

Audience This is your chance.

01:00:00 --> 01:00:06

to talk to the interviewer himself, Paul Williams from blank

01:00:06 --> 01:00:11

theology. You know, his videos are usually recorded, pre recorded and

01:00:11 --> 01:00:13

they're put out there so there's no back and forth.

01:00:14 --> 01:00:20

I'm going to take two or three good and brief questions. Somewhat

01:00:20 --> 01:00:23

related to what we've been talking about. From the audience. We have

01:00:23 --> 01:00:28

about 400 to 500 people watching here, because we have here we're

01:00:28 --> 01:00:31

on Instagram and we're on Facebook. So bring your questions

01:00:31 --> 01:00:34

if you're on Instagram, bring it you can put it on Instagram. If

01:00:34 --> 01:00:38

you're on Facebook put on YouTube or Instagram. They're not checking

01:00:38 --> 01:00:41

the Facebook right now. Facebook is nothing other than now a

01:00:41 --> 01:00:45

glorified Craigslist if you ask me. The Facebook marketplace is

01:00:45 --> 01:00:47

the only thing going for it. She asked me

01:00:48 --> 01:00:48

here.

01:00:50 --> 01:00:53

And oh, sorry, I just insulted we got a Facebook engineer sitting

01:00:53 --> 01:00:55

right here. You need to go in there with dynamite the whole

01:00:55 --> 01:00:57

thing and start over.

01:00:59 --> 01:01:00

Okay,

01:01:01 --> 01:01:06

are you are you on Facebook at all? Yeah, I have a Facebook group

01:01:06 --> 01:01:08

called blogging theology. Not surprisingly, I have a private

01:01:08 --> 01:01:11

amount my own Facebook for me, but they may my blog and theology is

01:01:11 --> 01:01:13

on there. Yes, you find it useful.

01:01:14 --> 01:01:19

It's not really for me, I have it as a service to share my own

01:01:19 --> 01:01:22

content, but it's closed, but you can join it. In other words, it's

01:01:22 --> 01:01:25

devoid trolls getting in and just trashing the place. Makes sense.

01:01:25 --> 01:01:30

Yeah. Yeah, I used to be a huge Facebook fan. And I used to be on

01:01:30 --> 01:01:35

it all the time. But over the years, it just got so convoluted

01:01:35 --> 01:01:39

and it just never adapted. And I feel that Twitter is just

01:01:39 --> 01:01:42

completely left it in the dust and everyone's on Twitter. Right

01:01:42 --> 01:01:42

Great.

01:01:43 --> 01:01:46

All right. Here's a question for you

01:01:52 --> 01:01:53

What's my favorite color

01:01:57 --> 01:01:59

here's a question for you. Do you think Muslims should boycott piers

01:01:59 --> 01:02:00

Morgan's show

01:02:02 --> 01:02:04

going on the show I guess he means going on the show and Muslims not

01:02:04 --> 01:02:07

go on the show. I'm gonna say some it's gonna be slightly

01:02:08 --> 01:02:12

embarrassing and awkward. Really? Because I do have a view on this

01:02:12 --> 01:02:15

and several people have been on actually friends of mine. And I

01:02:15 --> 01:02:19

don't mean to criticize what their decision however I do think

01:02:19 --> 01:02:20

absolutely. We've

01:02:21 --> 01:02:26

we've had some big guns going on that program. Whether it be

01:02:26 --> 01:02:29

Mohammed hijab and Abdullah Andalusi another friend of mine

01:02:29 --> 01:02:32

was on the last night. My personal view is we don't need any more

01:02:32 --> 01:02:36

Muslims go on. Piers Morgan is a bigot isn't islamophobe he doesn't

01:02:36 --> 01:02:42

learn I don't mind people being bigots. If if when the arrows are

01:02:42 --> 01:02:45

pointed out they go Do you know you have a point I'll change my

01:02:45 --> 01:02:49

mind but he doesn't he's a bigger you know you know he's just a

01:02:49 --> 01:02:53

bigger so we should we shouldn't waste our time being his is kind

01:02:53 --> 01:02:58

of I don't know setups for him to exercise his his vile evil views I

01:02:58 --> 01:03:01

mean, he's you know, the way he treats Muslims compared to the way

01:03:01 --> 01:03:04

he treats the Israeli ambassador, for example, or Israeli spokesman

01:03:04 --> 01:03:08

at falling boycotting, but I'm gonna say that he has been on so

01:03:08 --> 01:03:10

far shouldn't have been on but I think we should certainly not go

01:03:10 --> 01:03:13

on ever again. Yeah, we wouldn't. We wouldn't have known the level

01:03:13 --> 01:03:18

of or his real attitude towards things if they hadn't gone on. And

01:03:19 --> 01:03:24

what it seems to be it's like his, his material on the show. Besides

01:03:24 --> 01:03:27

that, he gets, you know, a unique set of viewers every time he has a

01:03:27 --> 01:03:33

new guest. But it seems to be like the fodder for a slugfest on

01:03:33 --> 01:03:37

Twitter afterwards, every single guest of his and him ended up

01:03:37 --> 01:03:40

yelling at each other on Twitter. Exactly. It's very, very

01:03:40 --> 01:03:44

unwholesome. And I remember recently another friend of mine.

01:03:45 --> 01:03:46

Dr.

01:03:48 --> 01:03:50

Your name is Dr. Abdul Wahid.

01:03:52 --> 01:03:57

Who was stating the fact that you know, given how bad

01:03:58 --> 01:04:01

Piers Morgan thinks Islam is why so many women why most converts to

01:04:01 --> 01:04:05

Islam women. And I think it's Morgan. I heard him say, you know,

01:04:05 --> 01:04:09

oh, they that they obviously like pressing themselves. Yeah. Now,

01:04:09 --> 01:04:14

this is just sheer stupidity and bigotry and the fact that he is

01:04:14 --> 01:04:16

indeed, I've seen on Twitter afterwards. He's been roundly

01:04:16 --> 01:04:21

criticized, rightly by numerous people, but he's still defending

01:04:21 --> 01:04:25

what he said. And that shows me he's a bigot that I can't have any

01:04:25 --> 01:04:28

respect for as opposed to a bigot who actually listens and then

01:04:28 --> 01:04:32

changes his mind. We all make mistakes, but this guy just in

01:04:32 --> 01:04:37

trenches is ignorance and that's just Isha be kicked off TV and

01:04:37 --> 01:04:40

mitre and I think he's also basically a wing of corporate

01:04:40 --> 01:04:45

media. He's between corporate and and the new media or free media

01:04:45 --> 01:04:51

but because when he has an Israeli ambassador or Ben Shapiro, it's

01:04:51 --> 01:04:55

like with with mittens, he treats them right. And there's never some

01:04:55 --> 01:04:57

kind of there's never a controversy and there's never a

01:04:57 --> 01:04:59

fight on Twitter afterwards. So you

01:05:00 --> 01:05:02

You're in. Yeah. Okay.

01:05:03 --> 01:05:08

So that was a good question. Yep. Here's another question about your

01:05:08 --> 01:05:13

knowledge of Christian theology. Christians believe that Christ

01:05:13 --> 01:05:18

Himself is the temple. Okay. Is it blasphemous for Christians to

01:05:18 --> 01:05:21

believe in the Third Temple?

01:05:22 --> 01:05:26

The rebuilding of another temple? Well, I'm not a Christian. So I

01:05:26 --> 01:05:28

can't pronounce on what's blasphemous for Christians

01:05:28 --> 01:05:32

believe, you know, that's a Christian issue. I think believing

01:05:32 --> 01:05:35

in Jesus as Son of God, or God is blasphemous, but you know, I mean,

01:05:35 --> 01:05:40

but it's not my job to pronounce that to people. When you're doing

01:05:40 --> 01:05:42

Dower, I mean, your view as a blasphemer is

01:05:43 --> 01:05:47

quite heavy to the idea of the Third Temple. It is not, it is not

01:05:47 --> 01:05:51

normal Christian theology, but it is very popular in recent years

01:05:51 --> 01:05:55

amongst so called Christian Zionists, most of them are in your

01:05:55 --> 01:05:59

country, should America reasonable. So the vast majority

01:05:59 --> 01:06:03

of designers are actually Gentiles. They're not Jews, the

01:06:03 --> 01:06:08

Christians. And Alia Thai has spoken incredibly eloquently about

01:06:08 --> 01:06:12

this whole phenomenon of Christian Zionism, on on my channel, and

01:06:12 --> 01:06:16

certainly elsewhere as well, of course. And it is a very strange

01:06:16 --> 01:06:19

belief looking that, that somehow God will bring back the Third

01:06:19 --> 01:06:21

Temple when he's already abolished.

01:06:22 --> 01:06:26

The second temple in AD 70, according to the letter of the

01:06:26 --> 01:06:29

Hebrews, which is a letter in the New Testament, was all about this

01:06:29 --> 01:06:32

kind of thing about the how the Christian dispensation has

01:06:32 --> 01:06:36

fulfilled or overtaken or replaced the Jewish dispensation. You can

01:06:36 --> 01:06:40

bring back the Jewish dispensation. eschatological

01:06:41 --> 01:06:45

setting is, is really unbiblical. It has no use in Christian

01:06:45 --> 01:06:49

theology is really weird, actually. But it's gained this new

01:06:49 --> 01:06:52

cut of this currency because of interesting reason. It's just like

01:06:52 --> 01:06:57

Jewish support. Design ism is a new thing. support zone is a new

01:06:57 --> 01:07:01

thing. And I think what's really going on this is my opinion, I

01:07:01 --> 01:07:06

could be wrong. What's really going on behind this? Is Israel's

01:07:06 --> 01:07:11

itself anti Muslim, pro Western position. And so many Christians

01:07:12 --> 01:07:15

like Israel, because it's very anti Muslim, anti Islamic

01:07:15 --> 01:07:19

explicitly. I mean, I saw that I saw on Sky News earlier this

01:07:19 --> 01:07:23

evening, the Israeli ambassador to the United Kingdom State in an

01:07:23 --> 01:07:29

interview on Sky News, that she's apps, there's absolutely no hope

01:07:29 --> 01:07:32

of, of a two state solution. No hope. Okay.

01:07:33 --> 01:07:38

And she referenced in passing about the Palestinians, as in

01:07:38 --> 01:07:41

general, how radical they was, why should you be can't be a two state

01:07:41 --> 01:07:44

solution? Because they're radical. This is all of the Palestinians.

01:07:44 --> 01:07:48

Yeah, yeah. Right. So this idea of the radical palette, this all

01:07:48 --> 01:07:52

feeds in beautifully with a big narrative you find in the West, in

01:07:52 --> 01:07:55

the United States, obviously, and in Europe, to some extent, as

01:07:55 --> 01:07:59

well. So I can see why Christian, fundamentalist Christians would

01:07:59 --> 01:08:02

support Zionism because it ultimately is anti Islamic, and it

01:08:02 --> 01:08:06

fits in with the agenda. in Palestine and Israel, the

01:08:06 --> 01:08:09

population is 5050.

01:08:11 --> 01:08:16

Countries like Denmark, France, England, they're also complaining

01:08:16 --> 01:08:19

of the rising population of Muslims. So they seem to each

01:08:19 --> 01:08:25

other have similar grievances. And that's why they're really echoing

01:08:25 --> 01:08:28

the same emotions and the same sentiments. I see these circles.

01:08:28 --> 01:08:31

They're constantly like a Venn diagram. They're overlapping

01:08:31 --> 01:08:36

heavily in that regard. Yeah. All right. Here's the next question.

01:08:36 --> 01:08:39

This is from a gentleman by the name of Mark ward. He says a Salam

01:08:39 --> 01:08:44

aleikum wa rahmatullah wa barakato. What was the most

01:08:44 --> 01:08:48

difficult interview for you? And I did see someone else comment and

01:08:48 --> 01:08:52

asked something about your interview with William Lane.

01:08:52 --> 01:08:53

Craig,

01:08:54 --> 01:08:58

could you comment on your most inner difficult interview? Well,

01:08:58 --> 01:08:59

this is different. I mean, I've gotta be careful here, because

01:08:59 --> 01:09:02

some of these, these have been my guests. And they might be guests.

01:09:02 --> 01:09:05

Again, I don't want to criticize them publicly, because it's not

01:09:05 --> 01:09:09

appropriate. I do so but I won't comment on one because

01:09:11 --> 01:09:14

I will because I don't really mind if he gets offended because he

01:09:14 --> 01:09:19

behaved badly. Professor Herman, who is a biblical scholar is one

01:09:19 --> 01:09:22

of the great biblical scholars today, in my view, one of your

01:09:22 --> 01:09:28

many people. I invited him on and we did two interviews. One was on

01:09:28 --> 01:09:31

New Testament scholarship and so on. We had a great time. Fantastic

01:09:31 --> 01:09:34

interview, loved it, fanned out, we're we're on the same wavelength

01:09:34 --> 01:09:37

here and I and we were just playing off it was a fantastic

01:09:37 --> 01:09:40

interview. He enjoyed it. He wrote an article about it on his website

01:09:40 --> 01:09:46

really enjoyed it. Fantastic. He also separately did, and something

01:09:46 --> 01:09:47

I'd set up,

01:09:48 --> 01:09:56

had to debate discussion with a chap called Dr. Brown in is a

01:09:56 --> 01:10:00

Muslim living in Saudi Arabia. He's an eye surgeon

01:10:00 --> 01:10:00

Listen, I got it.

01:10:01 --> 01:10:05

And the debate was on was set up to be a discussion between a

01:10:05 --> 01:10:09

Muslim and an atheist support and representing atheism. And Bart

01:10:09 --> 01:10:14

Ehrman behaved badly. I mean, he just did. I mean, it was so bad

01:10:14 --> 01:10:17

that, you know, there's no one can dispute. And he actually

01:10:17 --> 01:10:22

apologized afterwards and not on camera, but to me, but he behaved

01:10:22 --> 01:10:25

badly. And it was, it was embarrassing, because I didn't

01:10:25 --> 01:10:28

know what to do. I mean, we have two eminent people, I'm not there

01:10:28 --> 01:10:30

like a school teacher in terms of behavior.

01:10:31 --> 01:10:36

That he would, but he was being very aggressive. He kept, he made

01:10:36 --> 01:10:41

mocking comments to Dr. Brown, they dismissive and didn't take

01:10:41 --> 01:10:45

seriously the I thought, the discussion. And that was very,

01:10:45 --> 01:10:48

very unfortunate, actually. And that was the worst one. I don't I

01:10:48 --> 01:10:51

mean, it Berman's watching this, he probably isn't, of course. But

01:10:51 --> 01:10:55

you know, I, it's just the way I saw it. And I think he did, he did

01:10:55 --> 01:10:59

acknowledge that he behaved badly. So you were the moderator of that

01:10:59 --> 01:11:02

debate? Well, moderation is too strong a word I was hosting it

01:11:02 --> 01:11:08

really, I was trying to steer too bright guys in a hopefully I read

01:11:08 --> 01:11:11

discussion towards, you know, elucidating what the issues were,

01:11:11 --> 01:11:14

and hopefully showing that, you know, Islam was a serious

01:11:14 --> 01:11:17

tradition. And the personalities were very different. And I think

01:11:17 --> 01:11:19

it was a mistake to put them together anyway.

01:11:20 --> 01:11:25

I mean, Dr. Brown's style is much more gentle than that. And I think

01:11:25 --> 01:11:26

he was steamrollered,

01:11:28 --> 01:11:34

very aggressive American professor who really has such contempt for

01:11:34 --> 01:11:38

religion that he couldn't seriously. And I've seen by

01:11:38 --> 01:11:41

ermine, as an academic, you say, who was very respectful, were

01:11:41 --> 01:11:42

normally very respectful

01:11:43 --> 01:11:47

and expected that approach to continue and it didn't. Do you

01:11:47 --> 01:11:50

enjoy moderating these kinds of debates? Is that something you

01:11:50 --> 01:11:54

look forward to doing in the future? Oh, absolutely. I was

01:11:54 --> 01:11:57

hugely privileged to be invited to moderate debate as a tuna College

01:11:57 --> 01:12:03

in Berkeley, California in February, where a very wonderful

01:12:03 --> 01:12:08

professor of Islamic law from Toronto University was 100

01:12:08 --> 01:12:12

federal, and our own Sheikh Hassan spiker.

01:12:13 --> 01:12:18

And I was invited and did did host a debate, although I was told

01:12:18 --> 01:12:20

wasn't quite a debate. It's more of a discussion. But really, it

01:12:20 --> 01:12:24

was a debate between these two gentlemen. And that was very, very

01:12:24 --> 01:12:27

interesting in front of a big audience. It's a tuner and it was

01:12:27 --> 01:12:30

fantastic. I really enjoyed that. Because I get you know, at least I

01:12:30 --> 01:12:33

get some opportunity to ask the kinds of questions I want to ask

01:12:33 --> 01:12:36

even if I'm not, I it's not entirely selfish, but I get some

01:12:36 --> 01:12:39

small window where I can actually ask what I wanted. It's very

01:12:39 --> 01:12:42

indulgent. In that sense, what was the statement of that debate?

01:12:44 --> 01:12:48

The same was based on on a saying called

01:12:50 --> 01:12:55

slogan, do what thou wilt do what their will is the creed of

01:12:55 --> 01:13:00

Aleister Crowley who was an English satanist no less

01:13:01 --> 01:13:04

Aleister Crowley he actually be actually a featured on a Beatles

01:13:04 --> 01:13:08

cover, Kid you not that as well. So do what they do. In other

01:13:08 --> 01:13:12

words, you're not doing God's will. I'm doing what I want to do

01:13:12 --> 01:13:16

is the only creed I need follow this. And the argument was

01:13:16 --> 01:13:20

proposition was this is actually the creed of our era of the

01:13:20 --> 01:13:25

Zeitgeist. Yeah, what we believe as a civilization you do your own

01:13:25 --> 01:13:31

thing, without any reference to any, any divine command or divine

01:13:31 --> 01:13:35

frame of reference. So that was a discussion and it was bought in

01:13:35 --> 01:13:37

Liberal liberalism, nature of liberalism, whether or not you

01:13:37 --> 01:13:41

could Islamic, or Muslim could leave and it was living in this

01:13:41 --> 01:13:47

Muslim society. And so we talked about, you know, roles and all of

01:13:47 --> 01:13:51

that, but it was very topical, actually, I thought, but in that

01:13:51 --> 01:13:55

case, both of them would agree that that statement would be evil.

01:13:57 --> 01:13:59

Yes, but hasn't spiker

01:14:01 --> 01:14:06

did not accept that liberalism. Could actually is a viable project

01:14:07 --> 01:14:12

project at all as problematic. Was the professor from Toronto accept

01:14:12 --> 01:14:15

the thought of liberalism, in a modified form? The the Rawlsian

01:14:16 --> 01:14:19

liberalism genre was the American philosopher, was actually

01:14:19 --> 01:14:24

compatible with Islam. Like I said, liberalism is not compatible

01:14:24 --> 01:14:27

with Islam. My own preference was very, very much for Hasson Spiker,

01:14:27 --> 01:14:31

I think, but then I'm not there. That was, that wasn't the point

01:14:31 --> 01:14:34

what my view was, you mentioned Satanist. Do you know about Albert

01:14:34 --> 01:14:37

Pike's three World War of vision?

01:14:38 --> 01:14:42

No, I don't. Okay, you might be interested in that. Check it out.

01:14:42 --> 01:14:46

It's a short letter. That's there's verification that was

01:14:46 --> 01:14:53

written way back in the early or late 19th century so late 1800s.

01:14:54 --> 01:14:58

That he was a Satanist. And he had a vision from Satan that there

01:14:58 --> 01:14:59

will be three world wars

01:15:00 --> 01:15:03

One would knock out Christianity from Europe knock out the kings.

01:15:03 --> 01:15:08

The second would set up a Jewish state. And the third would be

01:15:08 --> 01:15:13

between Jews and Muslims. And the goal of the three world wars is

01:15:13 --> 01:15:17

that it would take all this time to knock out monotheism from the

01:15:17 --> 01:15:24

earth and give atheism * over the earth. And after atheism

01:15:24 --> 01:15:28

settles as the dominant mode of operation in the earth after that

01:15:28 --> 01:15:33

the Luciferian doctrine or the or Satanism itself can manifest and

01:15:33 --> 01:15:38

invite people in from from the void that they're in. That's idea.

01:15:38 --> 01:15:42

I think you'd find it fascinating. The Albert Pike. Yeah, Albert Pike

01:15:42 --> 01:15:45

was it was a big set innocent from in from America.

01:15:47 --> 01:15:50

Okay, one more question from our guests.

01:15:51 --> 01:15:53

Who is a good question, actually.

01:15:54 --> 01:15:59

This is from Lily Rose. Who would you really like to interview that

01:15:59 --> 01:16:00

you haven't yet had the chance?

01:16:02 --> 01:16:06

Yes. Okay. I had to get a couple of answers that what academically

01:16:07 --> 01:16:12

Professor while Hallock of Columbia University dates, who am

01:16:12 --> 01:16:13

I big fan of?

01:16:14 --> 01:16:18

I'm still longing to interview him? I've not I've not exhausted

01:16:18 --> 01:16:23

efforts to him, although I know people who are Imam Tom tweeted

01:16:23 --> 01:16:25

recently yesterday, I think it was photographed with him and while

01:16:25 --> 01:16:29

Halak you know, he's the author of the impossible stage and numerous

01:16:29 --> 01:16:35

other books on Islamic law and epistemology is, is he's very,

01:16:35 --> 01:16:39

very juicy academically and he's actually a Christian as well. It's

01:16:39 --> 01:16:42

amazing. You wouldn't have it, I don't think you'd ever know that.

01:16:42 --> 01:16:44

I'm not sure he would approve of me saying this but much you never

01:16:44 --> 01:16:45

know that reading his books

01:16:46 --> 01:16:49

clearly has a profound understanding and sympathy towards

01:16:49 --> 01:16:53

Islam in the Sharia and so on. So he will be my academic number one

01:16:53 --> 01:16:57

because I just have such huge respect for him.

01:16:58 --> 01:17:04

But you know, other people use of Islam I've I won't go into the

01:17:04 --> 01:17:08

details about that, but I'd like to, he does follow my work but I

01:17:08 --> 01:17:12

like to have him on as well. I think he's a because he's such a

01:17:12 --> 01:17:16

lovely human being there's a good embodiment, I think of of the

01:17:16 --> 01:17:19

Sunnah of the Prophet upon every piece in terms of his adab I mean,

01:17:19 --> 01:17:22

and he's obviously a talented as well as he's a very, very nice

01:17:22 --> 01:17:24

person. I very much like to

01:17:25 --> 01:17:28

just talked to him, not necessarily about heavy theology,

01:17:28 --> 01:17:31

but whatever so but it was a long list of people I like to have one

01:17:31 --> 01:17:35

but those two come to mind anyway. Very good. How about this one?

01:17:35 --> 01:17:40

This is interesting. You came into Islam how have you navigated the

01:17:40 --> 01:17:45

different contentious I should say groups within medicine I'm not

01:17:45 --> 01:17:46

gonna say sects, the groups

01:17:48 --> 01:17:52

that hold one another erroneous within the Sunnah.

01:17:53 --> 01:17:57

Alison, how have you navigated that? You know, sometimes that's a

01:17:57 --> 01:18:02

problem for people. Yeah, it was for me, I have I have journeyed

01:18:02 --> 01:18:05

from different positions, I've now reached a position which I'm

01:18:05 --> 01:18:09

fairly comfortable with. I came into Islam through the door of

01:18:09 --> 01:18:14

Sufism. So through guidance work, a lot of British Muslims become

01:18:14 --> 01:18:18

Muslim through Salafism and I didn't but through Sufism, and I

01:18:18 --> 01:18:21

was quite happy there for some time actually been quite anti

01:18:21 --> 01:18:25

Salafi, I picked up that virus, just because it seemed part of the

01:18:25 --> 01:18:26

package.

01:18:27 --> 01:18:30

And then because of an event several years ago, a very

01:18:31 --> 01:18:34

traumatic event really, I'm not going to go into here but

01:18:35 --> 01:18:38

a couple of Salafi friends of mine

01:18:39 --> 01:18:41

basically saved my faith.

01:18:42 --> 01:18:44

And as I look at the issues because

01:18:45 --> 01:18:47

there's not the right program for this

01:18:48 --> 01:18:52

and I gained and appreciate it again, something you yourself

01:18:52 --> 01:18:56

might perhaps approve of, or many others but nevertheless as why at

01:18:56 --> 01:19:00

where I'm at, I gained a positive appreciation for many aspects of

01:19:00 --> 01:19:02

salary, the salary outlook

01:19:04 --> 01:19:09

and whether it be the Aqeedah whether it be the handle you might

01:19:09 --> 01:19:11

have as identify as a humbly

01:19:13 --> 01:19:16

and so on as a methodology of the salary

01:19:18 --> 01:19:22

but particularly since the my work on BT I found myself because I

01:19:22 --> 01:19:25

can't I can't be although some people would like me to be I can't

01:19:25 --> 01:19:30

be professional on the channel. I can't say well, you shouldn't be X

01:19:30 --> 01:19:33

Mr. Muslim, you should follow this school or that school I can't do

01:19:33 --> 01:19:36

it is simply wrong. That's not what I do.

01:19:37 --> 01:19:42

So I've grown to have a very, I find myself agreeing with many

01:19:42 --> 01:19:46

positions and having a positive appreciation of them. Many people

01:19:46 --> 01:19:48

will think these positions are irreconcilable. So actually, in

01:19:48 --> 01:19:51

some ways, I'm quite pro Sufi. I don't mean all the Sufi practices,

01:19:51 --> 01:19:55

but the earlier ones I you know, the self purification ones, I can

01:19:55 --> 01:19:57

read guide and who's a Sufi and still appreciate him.

01:19:59 --> 01:20:00

I can also

01:20:00 --> 01:20:04

Be very pro Salafi and appreciate what some, you know, a lot of

01:20:04 --> 01:20:08

Salafi works. So I find and when it comes to the the rulers I can

01:20:08 --> 01:20:12

be quite appreciate like his Victoria, you know, which is, you

01:20:12 --> 01:20:14

know, very much in favor of a caliphate and I'm strong believer

01:20:14 --> 01:20:19

in the caliphate actually now as it really key issue for us today

01:20:19 --> 01:20:22

and also understand those who oppose this kind of so called you

01:20:22 --> 01:20:27

know, well the whole issues so I find myself actually affirming an

01:20:27 --> 01:20:30

awful lot and denying very little and I said to a friend of mine

01:20:30 --> 01:20:33

recently you know, I'm just being consistent aren't I? And they said

01:20:33 --> 01:20:36

no no this is fine you can it's the other people who think you

01:20:36 --> 01:20:40

can't appreciate the positive aspects of these things that

01:20:40 --> 01:20:43

aren't there's not a good place to be and so I I affirm a lot of

01:20:43 --> 01:20:46

Sufism affirm a lot and Salafi thought I agree with the Akita,

01:20:46 --> 01:20:51

Salafi, etc etc. Even though formally, these groups that self

01:20:51 --> 01:20:55

identify, may be very hostile to each other. So Sophie's may hate

01:20:55 --> 01:20:59

selfies, selfies may sit, make massively overgeneralize

01:20:59 --> 01:21:02

statements about Sufism, and dismiss it all. I don't agree with

01:21:02 --> 01:21:08

that. So I'm actually quite affirming of that I do. I do have

01:21:08 --> 01:21:12

a line. By the way, I don't affirm modernism, I don't tend to affirm

01:21:12 --> 01:21:18

liberalism at all. So I guess I'm strictly orthodox in my Outlook.

01:21:18 --> 01:21:23

But within that, I have quite a broad understanding of what I

01:21:23 --> 01:21:28

think is positive. I think, in the long term, having a very

01:21:30 --> 01:21:35

nasty heart towards groups. In the long term, it just hurts you. It's

01:21:35 --> 01:21:39

one thing to have an opinion. But it's another thing that let that

01:21:39 --> 01:21:42

root so deeply in a person's heart, that they have such a

01:21:42 --> 01:21:42

hatred.

01:21:43 --> 01:21:47

It's one thing to sort of dismiss opinions that you disagree with.

01:21:47 --> 01:21:52

But that's an opinion and it's not a person in my shooted had dead

01:21:52 --> 01:21:56

he, he had opinions. He was a scholar, everyone knows his

01:21:56 --> 01:22:00

opinions. But he also had a teaching that he wanted all of his

01:22:00 --> 01:22:03

moods, all of his disciples to have a clean heart towards all

01:22:03 --> 01:22:07

Muslims. And I think that in the long term is extremely important

01:22:08 --> 01:22:11

to keep someone's Amen. You see a lot of people who came off, who

01:22:11 --> 01:22:16

fell off is because they almost were their hearts were at war with

01:22:16 --> 01:22:20

other groups. And eventually, that never leads to anything good.

01:22:22 --> 01:22:25

So all right, let's see the

01:22:30 --> 01:22:33

here's a question says, was Paul involved with the Morbi tune group

01:22:33 --> 01:22:36

in Norwich in the 80s? I don't think so. Right.

01:22:38 --> 01:22:41

Yeah, that group was told I wasn't.

01:22:43 --> 01:22:46

I know, I know. You mean, but no, I was too young for that. Yeah.

01:22:46 --> 01:22:49

All right. We thank you so much, I don't want to keep you too long.

01:22:49 --> 01:22:53

Because we've we've gotten now now I know, you're used to actually

01:22:53 --> 01:22:57

live streams that sometimes go two and three and four hours, but we

01:22:57 --> 01:22:58

want to be respectful of your time.

01:23:00 --> 01:23:04

Inshallah, tada, I would love to do this again. And to talk again,

01:23:04 --> 01:23:09

I'm going to keep sharing with you some neat ideas that I think you'd

01:23:09 --> 01:23:13

like and like to make videos out of. We're in contact privately. So

01:23:13 --> 01:23:15

please do share. If you have any ideas like that, I really

01:23:15 --> 01:23:19

appreciate these suggestions. Thank you. I appreciate it. A love

01:23:19 --> 01:23:23

talking to you love your work. And let me tell you, the OMA loves

01:23:23 --> 01:23:27

your work. So many people love Paul Williams. And I think your

01:23:27 --> 01:23:33

attitude of sort of neutrality within orthodoxy. And Islam is

01:23:33 --> 01:23:36

very helpful as an interviewer, if you were to pick one, so I know

01:23:36 --> 01:23:38

that you eliminate all the other people you can interview them.

01:23:38 --> 01:23:39

Right. So

01:23:41 --> 01:23:44

again, I really believe that the western world is benefiting so

01:23:44 --> 01:23:48

much from your work and Allah has chosen you in a very short period

01:23:48 --> 01:23:52

of time to do a lot of good we ask Allah subhanaw taala to let you

01:23:52 --> 01:23:56

continue and give you the tofield to continue this and even expand

01:23:57 --> 01:23:59

blogging, theology, expand your work on Twitter,

01:24:01 --> 01:24:03

and everything else, just colloquia. And thank you so much

01:24:03 --> 01:24:06

for coming on. It's been an absolute July, you've been a great

01:24:06 --> 01:24:08

host, thank you very much for this opportunity as well. Thank you.

01:24:08 --> 01:24:09

Thank you barnacle effect, thank you.

01:24:14 --> 01:24:18

Okay, there you have it, brothers and sisters, again, a lot of you

01:24:18 --> 01:24:22

saying you love Paul Williams and love his work, you could tell from

01:24:22 --> 01:24:26

his intention, you can see you can sense a pure intention when you

01:24:26 --> 01:24:30

see one. And that to me, in my view is a pure intention that is

01:24:30 --> 01:24:35

reaping the rewards of having that kind of clean heart towards the

01:24:35 --> 01:24:39

OMA and just wanting to get to the truth and that's really

01:24:41 --> 01:24:44

the attitude we should all have. So please make dua for him Allah

01:24:44 --> 01:24:47

continue his work. I did tell everybody that I'm going to read a

01:24:47 --> 01:24:51

little bit from signs at the end of time. Look at these voluminous

01:24:51 --> 01:24:56

works. The scholars Allah bless them have spilled so much ink,

01:24:56 --> 01:24:59

right bringing us so much here.

01:25:02 --> 01:25:06

You've been asking about the SOFIA any other signs of the end of

01:25:06 --> 01:25:08

time. And

01:25:11 --> 01:25:14

it's going to be in the last volume. So this is volume Pset

01:25:14 --> 01:25:18

seven this is the last volume. So this should have

01:25:21 --> 01:25:23

should have looked it up before we came but it didn't. So

01:25:28 --> 01:25:29

don't tell this

01:25:31 --> 01:25:33

wait a second. Is this the last volume?

01:25:35 --> 01:25:36

This can't be

01:25:37 --> 01:25:39

where's that activism in here?

01:25:40 --> 01:25:43

Maybe it's in a different order than I expected.

01:25:44 --> 01:25:48

I mean, you go to activism and be down Hey, pick up the last book

01:25:48 --> 01:25:48

right?

01:25:50 --> 01:25:54

Logic says that right. Pick up the last book. I don't see Africa as a

01:25:54 --> 01:26:00

man I see in medical the photo kill when it's a best in history.

01:26:01 --> 01:26:02

Share a jeep.

01:26:03 --> 01:26:03

Zane

01:26:05 --> 01:26:09

look this through this for me for Africanism and her looking here if

01:26:09 --> 01:26:12

you see a Sophia Annie. If not, let's say

01:26:14 --> 01:26:18

let's open it up. Thank you all model for the idea. We'll open it

01:26:18 --> 01:26:21

up in a Shambhala okay

01:26:27 --> 01:26:29

and let's take your q&a as well at the same time

01:26:34 --> 01:26:39

that was a good interview, wasn't it? I really liked it. And I'm a

01:26:39 --> 01:26:41

big fan. I'm telling you. I'm a big fan of that type of

01:26:44 --> 01:26:45

OMA wide attitude

01:26:51 --> 01:26:54

Alright, let's take some q&a. Whether we find it or not. We'll

01:26:54 --> 01:26:56

have to do it another time properly from that but keep

01:26:56 --> 01:26:58

looking just right. It'd be J when you hire

01:27:04 --> 01:27:09

all right here is wrestler where's that? Wrestler? Where was it?

01:27:10 --> 01:27:15

I'm looking he asked about how he can attend live here. Listen, what

01:27:15 --> 01:27:18

is our schedule here? Our schedule is Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday.

01:27:18 --> 01:27:23

The studio is open, good people can attend. We don't have any

01:27:23 --> 01:27:25

rules on attendance until something goes wrong, then we'll

01:27:25 --> 01:27:26

make one

01:27:27 --> 01:27:29

because that's what's going to happen, right?

01:27:31 --> 01:27:35

Yes, send a message to inside a telegram. Say you're coming. We'll

01:27:35 --> 01:27:38

reach out to you and we'll let you in. We're on the third floor of

01:27:38 --> 01:27:41

the soup kitchen. One mile down from University Hospital Robert

01:27:41 --> 01:27:43

Wood Johnson got

01:27:44 --> 01:27:47

and we'd love for people to come and sometimes he will come with

01:27:47 --> 01:27:50

treats. For example today. There is a nice beautiful Jersey pizza

01:27:50 --> 01:27:54

sitting right there. Let's see what it's like. And if we have to

01:27:54 --> 01:27:55

put it in the oven Who's this from?

01:27:57 --> 01:28:02

Zhi Shan again, okay, very good pizza needs to go be put in the

01:28:02 --> 01:28:04

oven. Zayn, you know how to use an oven.

01:28:05 --> 01:28:05

Good.

01:28:07 --> 01:28:10

All right, you know what the oven is? Downstairs. Look it up. But I

01:28:10 --> 01:28:12

don't know if you could put the box in the oven.

01:28:16 --> 01:28:20

Okay, so put out what to 250 or something. Yeah.

01:28:23 --> 01:28:28

Now it's open. I opened the front door. Okay, so, secondly, in the

01:28:28 --> 01:28:28

masjid

01:28:29 --> 01:28:35

Tuesday, um, they're given classes from 530 to seven.

01:28:36 --> 01:28:37

You can sit on those classes

01:28:39 --> 01:28:39

tonight.

01:28:40 --> 01:28:44

What's What's the gentleman's name who gave that? Tonight we have an

01:28:44 --> 01:28:50

event John Ressler. We have an event tonight at 730 with saba.

01:28:50 --> 01:28:53

I'm having a discussion with the members of one okay.

01:28:55 --> 01:29:00

That's for young professionals. Okay, it's not for men for made

01:29:00 --> 01:29:03

for marriage, but it's the same people the same age of people who

01:29:03 --> 01:29:05

want to get married. So it comes to that.

01:29:06 --> 01:29:11

Number three, every Thursday is a big night at mbyc I'm there I give

01:29:11 --> 01:29:14

I read from the books have to sold off

01:29:15 --> 01:29:16

the books of sea damage Zoo.

01:29:17 --> 01:29:21

Good. Works of two so Wolf. And then we have Knight of sulla on

01:29:21 --> 01:29:24

the prophets of Allah who it was sudden, next year, it's going to

01:29:24 --> 01:29:29

be to sofern our daughter fetch classes for hour and a half, two

01:29:29 --> 01:29:33

hours. Then night of Salah on the Prophet where we read the poetry

01:29:33 --> 01:29:37

and the salah on the prophet from at Habib Omar have been said and

01:29:37 --> 01:29:37

been huffy.

01:29:38 --> 01:29:41

Every Friday night, we got something going on but this

01:29:41 --> 01:29:45

Friday, the youth are going to New York, I don't think I'm gone. I

01:29:45 --> 01:29:47

think I need to just take the night off to prepare for the ombre

01:29:47 --> 01:29:52

trip. So this Friday, I won't be coming down to the masjid. But

01:29:55 --> 01:29:58

the youth will be going to New York City for the youth night. All

01:29:58 --> 01:29:59

right, but every

01:30:00 --> 01:30:05

a Friday night I'm in the mosque and every Juma we're in the masjid

01:30:05 --> 01:30:08

and then we go out to lunch. That lunch is so important. I can't

01:30:08 --> 01:30:12

tell you it's one of the son of many automat that they they do

01:30:12 --> 01:30:16

that okay? And have a luncheon and Sheila, here's Jennifer Phillips

01:30:16 --> 01:30:21

Shaka question is the third a way to temple. Actually the current

01:30:21 --> 01:30:26

Masjid there that the Jews haven't been able to recognize

01:30:29 --> 01:30:33

is it I don't know. Good question. Hey, Zog can you look that up or

01:30:33 --> 01:30:38

you get kicked off a Facebook if you can you look up if the temple

01:30:40 --> 01:30:45

Okay, the third way to Temple is in the location of the mosque of

01:30:45 --> 01:30:50

AXA muscle oxide or not. We have I am sitting here with one of the

01:30:50 --> 01:30:55

top programmers of Facebook. He's working on meta. He is a believer

01:30:55 --> 01:30:59

in meta, that meta is actually something that's gonna happen.

01:30:59 --> 01:31:05

Okay. And I'm telling you why it might happen because Zuck needs a

01:31:05 --> 01:31:09

success. Tell me the last product he did that was successful.

01:31:12 --> 01:31:19

He bought it. Instagram. He bought it. Right. WhatsApp. He bought it.

01:31:20 --> 01:31:22

Facebook. He stole it.

01:31:24 --> 01:31:29

successes. Yes to steal. Yeah. But

01:31:30 --> 01:31:31

yeah.

01:31:32 --> 01:31:36

Virginia steel. Yes. Steve Jobs, right. Look.

01:31:37 --> 01:31:41

Musk though, does stuff you have to admit that Tesla was in his

01:31:41 --> 01:31:44

invention. But he took it and made it a reality those those two guys

01:31:44 --> 01:31:48

were gonna fail. Right? The guys who founded Tesla were they

01:31:48 --> 01:31:51

weren't sharp. They weren't strong. They weren't gangsters.

01:31:51 --> 01:31:56

Right. He took it a major reality. SpaceX, it's the satellite, anyone

01:31:56 --> 01:31:59

could buy a satellite, right? But he just keeps buying satellites.

01:31:59 --> 01:32:04

So he has neuro link now. The Tesla just released a robot. Tesla

01:32:04 --> 01:32:08

is going to be the leader in robots. He saw the robot today,

01:32:08 --> 01:32:08

right?

01:32:10 --> 01:32:14

Yeah, on Oculus prime, what's his name? What's the Transformers

01:32:14 --> 01:32:17

name? Optimus Prime. That's what he called it.

01:32:19 --> 01:32:22

Shouldn't have gone dancing everything but it walks like it

01:32:22 --> 01:32:25

has to go to the bathroom. Right? Did you see it?

01:32:27 --> 01:32:31

Optimus you guys didn't see he released a video on Optimus today.

01:32:31 --> 01:32:35

Right? Optimus is his new robot. Okay.

01:32:36 --> 01:32:38

I don't know what Optimus what that robot for regular people is

01:32:38 --> 01:32:42

going to do, we'll find we will definitely find uses for it. But

01:32:42 --> 01:32:43

eventually my worry is that

01:32:44 --> 01:32:47

eventually it's going to be used for war and policing. And there's

01:32:47 --> 01:32:51

been no empathy. See, the thing is, in policing, there's empathy.

01:32:52 --> 01:32:55

When when a police pulls you over, or stops or something, there's

01:32:55 --> 01:32:59

some chance I can talk to him and he could see that I'm in distress.

01:32:59 --> 01:33:02

But if I'm speeding, let's say for example, and there's Hey, hold on,

01:33:02 --> 01:33:05

my wife's about to have a baby and I get stopped by a robot. There's

01:33:05 --> 01:33:09

no some of that empathy is a problem. lack of empathy, I should

01:33:09 --> 01:33:09

say.

01:33:17 --> 01:33:20

I don't like it now hoping up. I hope doesn't end up policing us

01:33:20 --> 01:33:22

now. Yeah. Yeah.

01:33:23 --> 01:33:25

That's a moral dilemma.

01:33:27 --> 01:33:31

Yeah, big moral dilemma on AI and wars, because that's why I think

01:33:31 --> 01:33:34

like if you have that robot, and that robot kills a baby, no one's

01:33:34 --> 01:33:37

gonna be responsible because they're just gonna say a glitch.

01:33:37 --> 01:33:38

Right.

01:33:40 --> 01:33:44

Right. And no one will actually feel guilty either. Like when you

01:33:44 --> 01:33:48

do that stuff. War Crimes usually come to an end because people they

01:33:48 --> 01:33:51

know someone's guilty but if you keep saying oh, this is an

01:33:51 --> 01:33:52

accident, it's a glitch.

01:33:55 --> 01:33:58

Alright, so tell me if you got find out about the Third Temple,

01:33:58 --> 01:33:59

and then then I have to leave.

01:34:01 --> 01:34:05

Jonnie date seed says, I'm supposed to follow one of the four

01:34:05 --> 01:34:11

Imams The answer is yes, we Muslims believe that the the early

01:34:11 --> 01:34:13

scholars they sought to find the truth and they develop these

01:34:13 --> 01:34:16

methodologies. Truth About What when we have the Quran Listen, we

01:34:16 --> 01:34:20

have the truth, right? But the Quran and the Hadith have texts in

01:34:20 --> 01:34:23

them have verses have had eats that can have multiple meanings.

01:34:24 --> 01:34:28

And there are some narrations from companions. They heard something

01:34:28 --> 01:34:30

from the Prophet other companions heard something else from the

01:34:30 --> 01:34:33

profit. How do we bring these two together? Which one do we choose?

01:34:34 --> 01:34:37

Okay, some companions understood a verse of Quran meaning one thing

01:34:37 --> 01:34:39

others understood it meaning another thing which one do we go

01:34:39 --> 01:34:44

by? So in that realm of things, we need scholarship. When you when

01:34:44 --> 01:34:47

you were not scholars, we're going to seek out the scholars and

01:34:47 --> 01:34:51

follow their scholarship. When we follow their scholarship. You're

01:34:51 --> 01:34:56

essentially following the person you believe is most worthy of

01:34:56 --> 01:34:59

following and you're following the methodology

01:35:00 --> 01:35:02

that you believe is the right methodology. So what do you do you

01:35:02 --> 01:35:06

study the 40 memes, watch their videos, read books about them

01:35:06 --> 01:35:10

study all four give yourself a whole year just to let it settle

01:35:10 --> 01:35:13

you're not going to study like boom, boom, boom No, you're going

01:35:13 --> 01:35:16

to study overtime let things marinate in your mind observe

01:35:16 --> 01:35:21

mosques, observe scholars then make a decision of who you believe

01:35:21 --> 01:35:27

is most worthy of following Okay, that's how simple it is. Okay,

01:35:27 --> 01:35:29

it's like picking a doctor

01:35:30 --> 01:35:30

okay

01:35:41 --> 01:35:43

you gotta go I gotta run okay a

01:35:54 --> 01:35:55

lot of questions coming in here

01:36:06 --> 01:36:08

bring on multi level lathe.

01:36:09 --> 01:36:10

Please

01:36:15 --> 01:36:20

purify our comm or chat section here from this nonsense

01:36:31 --> 01:36:33

can we take theater from Muhammad sucks? I don't know who he is.

01:36:33 --> 01:36:37

Maybe I should look him up. Rose Gold. Can you explain the verse?

01:36:37 --> 01:36:39

Allah doesn't change your conditionally unless you change

01:36:39 --> 01:36:42

what is it within yourself? It means you know what this verse

01:36:42 --> 01:36:47

came out of a group of Benny astroglia in the ancient times,

01:36:47 --> 01:36:52

and had a prophet, they obeyed that Prophet, they lived by that

01:36:52 --> 01:36:59

the Torah. They were so righteous. Then Allah subhana wa Tada

01:36:59 --> 01:37:03

stabilized their monarchy. Their village gave them wealth, their

01:37:03 --> 01:37:06

children were coming out good. Okay, it doesn't mean there's no

01:37:06 --> 01:37:10

problems in life, but in general, no major issues. Their enemies

01:37:10 --> 01:37:13

were at bay, their market was moving, their marriages were

01:37:13 --> 01:37:17

successful, their kids were good. They notice of how to how much

01:37:17 --> 01:37:22

clay is coming in, in our in our world, in our society in our

01:37:22 --> 01:37:25

lives. So how much goodness so they went to their Prophet and

01:37:25 --> 01:37:30

they said we're worried to lose this goodness, then Allah revealed

01:37:30 --> 01:37:33

to him Allah will not change your condition. All this goodness

01:37:33 --> 01:37:37

unless you change what is within yourselves. So it originally came

01:37:37 --> 01:37:42

down was revealed for goodness. Okay. So if you're thinking

01:37:42 --> 01:37:45

everything's going well, it's going to continue to go well as

01:37:45 --> 01:37:50

long as you're following the Cydia and abiding by it and remembering

01:37:50 --> 01:37:52

Allah much and devoting yourself to your Creator.

01:37:53 --> 01:37:56

It also applies to the opposite when we're in bad in a bad state.

01:37:57 --> 01:38:00

Bad political condition, bad worldly condition. It's never

01:38:00 --> 01:38:04

going to change unless we correct ourselves. Right? fix our hearts,

01:38:04 --> 01:38:07

fix our deeds, start following this video and start devoting

01:38:07 --> 01:38:09

ourselves to Allah subhanaw taala. Okay.

01:38:12 --> 01:38:15

The Albert Pike prophecy has me deeply worried I need some hope.

01:38:15 --> 01:38:18

Could you expound upon it? Yeah, they made it Satan made a big

01:38:18 --> 01:38:20

mistake. He doesn't realize that Allah to Allah

01:38:21 --> 01:38:27

is going to bring down an Imam and Mandy Prophet isover mme and

01:38:27 --> 01:38:33

Iblees is making a simple mistake that he is going to outdo God's

01:38:33 --> 01:38:37

plan. He's not going to do God's plan. But there will be trickery

01:38:37 --> 01:38:42

that he does in the world mass level of trickery, mass level of

01:38:42 --> 01:38:45

lies, we're already seeing it it's just happening in slow motion

01:38:45 --> 01:38:49

because real life happens in slow motion 90% of the time. All right,

01:38:49 --> 01:38:51

and ALLAH SubhanA wa Tada said,

01:38:52 --> 01:38:55

there will always be people upon the truth. And Allah to Allah said

01:38:55 --> 01:38:58

there will always be people coming into the truth and the numbers of

01:38:58 --> 01:39:01

Muslims will always be on the increase. Converts are on the

01:39:01 --> 01:39:08

increase, okay? And so his plan is is going to fail at that point.

01:39:08 --> 01:39:13

Because up to now he has not yet messed with Allah of Islam in the

01:39:13 --> 01:39:16

sense of these three world wars. The first he said, it's all about

01:39:16 --> 01:39:20

Europe. Second one is establish Israel also was in Europe, the

01:39:20 --> 01:39:25

third one this one is against the OMA of Islam, so it's not going to

01:39:25 --> 01:39:32

succeed and whatever appears like success will be against him. Okay,

01:39:32 --> 01:39:37

we'll turn back against him. Come up to Boston. Yes. So I'll come up

01:39:37 --> 01:39:39

to Boston and Charlotte have to come up to Boston and these big

01:39:39 --> 01:39:42

cities, please invite Schicksal demand via email. I will inshallah

01:39:42 --> 01:39:46

to add up. Ladies and gentlemen, I'd love to hang out with you a

01:39:46 --> 01:39:47

little bit more. But

01:39:49 --> 01:39:54

we have to go to Zakum locator and everybody Subhanak Allahu mobie

01:39:54 --> 01:39:59

100 A shadow and Illa Illa. Anta nests offer quantity with a cola

01:40:00 --> 01:40:04

Sit in Santa Fe because Illa Latina Mo Mo Salah hurt. What also

01:40:04 --> 01:40:09

will have to also be sub Mohammed Koulibaly go to Masjid Al Hussein,

01:40:09 --> 01:40:14

go to my selenium Emma sheffey If you only have time for to massage

01:40:14 --> 01:40:18

it if not then there are nine of these masajid all in a row. Mr.

01:40:18 --> 01:40:22

Hussein Al Azhar Sharif master chef I say the Zainab say da Isha.

01:40:23 --> 01:40:23

See the

01:40:24 --> 01:40:30

deer. There are nine such masajid so go to all of them just below

01:40:30 --> 01:40:30

head on.

01:40:32 --> 01:40:36

Oh, well it's the Oscars over I just did it within myself during

01:40:36 --> 01:40:40

the stream actually was said I'm on a coma rahmatullah wa barakato.

01:41:07 --> 01:41:08

Job

01:41:16 --> 01:41:16

know

01:41:19 --> 01:41:19

who

01:41:24 --> 01:41:24

God

Share Page