Shadee Elmasry – Interview Blogging Theology NBF 288

Shadee Elmasry
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the importance of laughter, the holy eye, the Bible's teachings, and the holy spirit in the creation process of humans. They also talk about theology and the importance of the Bible's teachings in bringing out the message of Jesus and the return of the Son of Man. The history and third-quarter-quarter terms are also discussed, with the third-quarter term being a moral dilemma on AI and war due to the robot killing a baby and causing war Crites.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:54 --> 00:00:58
			Smilla Rahmanir Rahim Al hamdu
lillah wa Salatu was Salam ala
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:02
			Rasulillah early he was happy
woman. Well, ladies and gentlemen,
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:05
			welcome to the stuffiness,
society, nothing but facts live
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:10
			stream on a gorgeous Wednesday.
And it is between Dora and Astrid
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:13
			here in the United in the United
States in the great state of New
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:16
			Jersey, where we're streaming
right down the street from the
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:20
			University Hospital, Robert Wood
Johnson Medical Center, and
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:24
			Rutgers University. Today, we have
a wonderful guests, we have
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:29
			somebody who has enriched, I would
say, the intellectual and
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:33
			spiritual lives of I could think I
could say millions of people now,
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:39
			based on his viewers, and his
Twitter handle is also nobody has
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:42
			had more impact with less words
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:48
			than our guests. Let's bring him
on Omar, Paul Williams, of
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:49
			blogging theology
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:55
			when it comes to them, or how to
live on it, gotcha. So you made me
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:55
			laugh.
		
00:01:57 --> 00:02:01
			But it is true, though, right?
What if you I liked I liked I like
		
00:02:01 --> 00:02:08
			tweets that are price impact for
hopefully witchy coin, rather than
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:12
			explaining everything, getting the
grammar wrong and the spelling. So
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:16
			yeah, I like epic, Chromat epic,
epic grammatic tweet.
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:21
			I love those tweets that you can
read in less than three seconds.
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:24
			Exactly. And that's one of the
reasons why
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:29
			pictures were worth 1000 words.
Because in a millisecond, you get
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:32
			all these messages in one write,
and it's brilliant. And oftentimes
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:34
			your tweet is just a picture
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:36
			with one line,
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:40
			sometimes just just a picture. And
I think that's even the best
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:45
			because I like to very much assume
that people who sing my stuff are
		
00:02:45 --> 00:02:49
			intelligent and can actually work
out the message for them. So they
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:53
			do not need to be spoon fed what
exactly indicate. So there's a
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:56
			deliberate attempt there to
actually minimize my own verbal
		
00:02:56 --> 00:03:00
			contribution to help people figure
it out for themselves. And that's
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:04
			part of my agenda. Really, it also
when you when you say less, and
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:07
			you put a picture up there,
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:12
			you actually save yourself a lot
of headache and heartache because
		
00:03:12 --> 00:03:15
			people won't come after you.
Right? I'm just putting up a
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:19
			picture, right? If people go after
the picture, right, there is that
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:22
			there's also it is actually people
that can be misunderstood. For
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:25
			example, my know design posts,
which medium for a while now.
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:29
			There are people out there I come
across occasionally who are
		
00:03:29 --> 00:03:33
			absolutely convinced that I'm an
atheist. Wow. No, seriously,
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:37
			because I say no design. They got
it wrong. Then they got the facial
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:41
			expression. Exactly. They missed
the emoji with the eyes looking
		
00:03:41 --> 00:03:42
			up. So they go, huh.
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:47
			irony, the subtext to this, so
they're not doing the work? Yeah,
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:51
			hoping by reading it
intelligently. And I've had
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:54
			arguments to people try to tell
them I'm not an atheist, and they
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:55
			don't agree with me.
		
00:03:56 --> 00:04:00
			When I caught myself, a Muslim,
it's kind of weird. I mean, they
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:03
			know what I think better than I
do. I mean, great. I'll tell you,
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:07
			I'll tell you the all time and I
say this genuinely the all time
		
00:04:07 --> 00:04:10
			best refutation of of evolution.
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:16
			Is the picture is your picture
next to the statue of Charles
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:21
			Darwin. Hashtag no design,
rolling, guys, right? Because
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:24
			think about that brilliance of
that, because we nobody would
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:29
			accept that the statue has no
design. Right has to have a person
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:34
			behind it with an intellect a will
and ability, right and knowledge.
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:36
			Right? And we should say
knowledge, not intellect,
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:42
			knowledge, life, ability, and
willpower. These four attributes
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:47
			cannot exist outside of a statue.
Right? Yeah. No, I enjoyed that. I
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:50
			haven't. I thought I've got to
have my photograph taken with
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:50
			Charles Darwin.
		
00:04:51 --> 00:04:55
			And but if I can just clarify one
point. Yeah. People often
		
00:04:55 --> 00:04:59
			sometimes think that I'm anti
evolution. Yeah. I
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:03
			That's not quite I'm a
creationist, but then all
		
00:05:03 --> 00:05:06
			believers are creationist, every
single Christian believing Jew.
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:10
			But it doesn't mean I believe the
universe was created in six days,
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:14
			or that all those species were
created instantaneously by God
		
00:05:14 --> 00:05:18
			wasn't some kind of macro process
leading up to human. So leading up
		
00:05:18 --> 00:05:22
			to animals. Yeah, it just went,
which was which God did through
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:26
			that mechanism. I just say the red
line when it comes to human
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:31
			beings. The Quran is very clear
that God created Adam and Eve and
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:33
			by special creation, and I draw a
red line at that that is
		
00:05:34 --> 00:05:38
			absolutely evolution doesn't come
into that. That's exactly the
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:41
			Islamic position. And you've
interviewed a lot of people on
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:44
			that, but that is exactly the
Slavic position is that the
		
00:05:44 --> 00:05:48
			theology of Islam only requires
deep belief in direct creation,
		
00:05:49 --> 00:05:54
			for the human being. As for frogs,
giraffes, whatever you want to
		
00:05:54 --> 00:05:57
			believe it, you won't, you're not
going to be asked about that.
		
00:05:57 --> 00:06:00
			Right? You want to believe they
came out of each other, or you
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:03
			want to believe that they were
created just like Adam was
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:05
			created. It's up to you. But
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:11
			there is no theology or
obligations on animals giraffes,
		
00:06:11 --> 00:06:16
			dogs, cats and squirrels and
insects. Another thing by the way,
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:19
			about the you know, design post
the pictures is that they're
		
00:06:19 --> 00:06:22
			intended deliberately almost
subliminally to get at the
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:27
			fitness, the fitness the
Fitzrovia, the fitness. The fitrah
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:30
			Yeah, always mixed up. The fitrah
is supposed to trigger that at
		
00:06:30 --> 00:06:34
			some level, even in the atheist,
when they see morals or creation,
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:38
			clearly the heady sign Yeah, idiot
naughty, but intellectually, they
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:41
			may not acknowledge that but
seeing a picture, not not an
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:46
			argument, not refutation, not a
form of words, saying Darwin was
		
00:06:46 --> 00:06:47
			wrong, but picture
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:53
			gets to one at an almost a
subliminal level of response. And
		
00:06:53 --> 00:06:57
			that's why I think the what the
Quran talks about the victories is
		
00:06:57 --> 00:07:01
			so helpful that yeah, that's why
the Quran says look so many times,
		
00:07:01 --> 00:07:08
			and looking, it moves emotion, and
an emotion, it's not just any
		
00:07:08 --> 00:07:14
			motion, it's an awe, and you don't
have all out of accidents, nobody
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:18
			is in awe of an accident, and
you're always in awe of something
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:22
			that's, that was done right or
done beautifully or done
		
00:07:22 --> 00:07:28
			perfectly. So the feeling of awe
never comes about when viewing
		
00:07:28 --> 00:07:33
			randomness, it always comes about
when viewing something that
		
00:07:33 --> 00:07:38
			deserves praise, right. And that's
the that's the rationality about
		
00:07:38 --> 00:07:41
			the Quran mandate to look keep
looking and looking and looking.
		
00:07:42 --> 00:07:45
			All right, your your heart will
tell you that there has to be some
		
00:07:45 --> 00:07:48
			knowledge and life and will behind
this. And that's the motivation
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:51
			behind this is basically
expressing the chronic injunction
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:56
			but in terms of no design posts,
so that really is the what's going
		
00:07:56 --> 00:08:00
			on there. Now, for those watching
on Instagram, you can only see
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:04
			half of me and half of our guests,
so hop over to YouTube, Safina
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:08
			society. And you can and you could
watch the rest of this interview
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:11
			with both of us here and you can
comment and we'll be taking some
		
00:08:11 --> 00:08:16
			q&a and q&a If our guests
approves. I'm happy long as
		
00:08:16 --> 00:08:20
			they're not difficult questions.
Yeah. Because Because your your
		
00:08:20 --> 00:08:22
			interviews are always pre
recorded, right? There's no
		
00:08:22 --> 00:08:25
			audience interaction. Now there's
a reason but I'll come to the
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:29
			reason why in a sec. If you want.
Yeah. Okay, good. Now today for
		
00:08:29 --> 00:08:33
			your for you who have always been
listening to blogging theology.
		
00:08:34 --> 00:08:37
			This is your chance to be able to
talk all right to the interviewer
		
00:08:37 --> 00:08:43
			himself. Now let's go back about
five years. And I remember we you
		
00:08:43 --> 00:08:46
			see you in different comments,
right, and knowing that this is
		
00:08:46 --> 00:08:50
			somebody who converted to Islam,
and sometimes you ask a question
		
00:08:50 --> 00:08:51
			or say common
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:57
			time passed, then didn't see you
for some period of time. Then I
		
00:08:57 --> 00:08:59
			don't know I wasn't paying
attention. Or maybe I was off
		
00:08:59 --> 00:09:02
			social media for a period of time
because sometimes I do go off, I
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:08
			come back. And all of a sudden,
blogging theology is a massive
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:12
			operation. And your Twitter handle
is gone through the roof. And I'm
		
00:09:12 --> 00:09:17
			thinking myself, what happened to
this brother, he's just like,
		
00:09:18 --> 00:09:20
			swallowed a Mario Brothers
mushroom. You remember Mario
		
00:09:20 --> 00:09:24
			Brothers, like swallowed the
mushroom, and now he's on fire. So
		
00:09:24 --> 00:09:30
			what exactly transpired? Well,
hamdulillah God transpired and
		
00:09:30 --> 00:09:34
			took me out of a fairly bad place
several years ago, about three or
		
00:09:34 --> 00:09:38
			four years ago. We won't go into
that now, if you don't mind. It
		
00:09:38 --> 00:09:43
			was a rather difficult place in
terms of my deen and so on. And it
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:46
			was really during the lockdown in
Cote during COVID. Actually, when
		
00:09:46 --> 00:09:52
			I found myself here in this place,
quite isolated as as millions of
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:54
			people in Britain in the world
actually were.
		
00:09:56 --> 00:09:59
			And I came into some money and I
decided, hey,
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:04
			Why not buy a new MacBook Pro?
Fascia, all this money didn't
		
00:10:04 --> 00:10:07
			really need at the top of the
range MacBook Pro, but hey, I had
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:11
			the money, so I buy it anyway.
And, and through that on YouTube,
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:14
			I thought, well, I'll make some
videos because it's a way of
		
00:10:14 --> 00:10:17
			making contact with the world out
there having some online
		
00:10:17 --> 00:10:20
			interaction, they didn't really
have I had about about 20 Or
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:25
			sorry, 2000 Twitter followers
about 2000 A little bit of
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:28
			interaction, I thought videos is
really my medium, much more. And
		
00:10:29 --> 00:10:32
			so I just started to make a couple
of videos, I think on
		
00:10:32 --> 00:10:35
			Christianity, New Testament
studies, Biblical Studies,
		
00:10:35 --> 00:10:39
			historical Jesus, things are
interested in me, drawing on the
		
00:10:39 --> 00:10:44
			books behind me my reading. And,
and that's how it started, it was
		
00:10:44 --> 00:10:49
			very much my attempt to reach out
during the isolation of COVID. But
		
00:10:49 --> 00:10:52
			after a couple of months,
something strange started to
		
00:10:52 --> 00:10:57
			happen that the subscriptions and
interest started to take off, but
		
00:10:57 --> 00:11:01
			in a way that was quite
unexpected. So I would have
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:05
			several 1000 new subscribers a
day. And and then
		
00:11:06 --> 00:11:10
			I after a while, after a couple of
months, it was several months, I
		
00:11:10 --> 00:11:14
			thought be really nice to have a
guest. There's no chance I'm going
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:17
			to get a scholar on because they
don't know about me and I'm not a
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:21
			scholar myself, of course, don't
have a PhD. So why would they come
		
00:11:21 --> 00:11:24
			up? So, but nevertheless, I
reached out to someone that I
		
00:11:24 --> 00:11:28
			quite liked a guy called Sir
Anthony buzzard. He was actually
		
00:11:28 --> 00:11:33
			was the head of Atlanta College in
Georgia in the United States is an
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:36
			Englishman. And his father
actually was head of Naval
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:40
			Intelligence during the Second
World War. And he is incredibly
		
00:11:40 --> 00:11:43
			distinguished lineage,
distinguished himself. So I
		
00:11:43 --> 00:11:46
			invited him on, hey, because he's
a he's a Unitarian Christian uses
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:49
			a Unitarian. So I thought this is
interesting, we can talk about
		
00:11:49 --> 00:11:54
			Jesus. And so I invited him and
amazingly, he said, Yes, but wow,
		
00:11:54 --> 00:11:59
			this is a big coup. No, wrong. And
we had such a good time. I mean,
		
00:11:59 --> 00:12:03
			it's such a great guy. And, and we
had a really good conversation
		
00:12:03 --> 00:12:06
			about New Testament Greek and
Christology and the struggle of
		
00:12:06 --> 00:12:11
			Jesus extra. And so that was like,
that broke the barriers a bit for
		
00:12:11 --> 00:12:14
			me. And I thought, well, you know,
I'd like to try someone else. But
		
00:12:14 --> 00:12:19
			this time go for a top notch
American scholar that I knew John
		
00:12:19 --> 00:12:24
			Dominic Crossan, who was the head
of the Jesus Seminar. He was
		
00:12:24 --> 00:12:26
			professor at DePaul University,
one of the world's leading
		
00:12:26 --> 00:12:28
			scholars is still there, both of
these people are still very much
		
00:12:28 --> 00:12:32
			with us and writing. And
amazingly, he said, Yes.
		
00:12:33 --> 00:12:37
			And that really showed me that it
was possible to seriously invite
		
00:12:37 --> 00:12:40
			but I had a track record that
actually had people are invited.
		
00:12:40 --> 00:12:43
			And the videos were doing well.
Yeah, that that was the beginning
		
00:12:43 --> 00:12:52
			of my engagement with academics.
And my, my philosophy, still is my
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:57
			attitude is attempting to build a
bridge between the ivory tower,
		
00:12:57 --> 00:13:01
			the world of academia, and the
intelligent layperson you will
		
00:13:01 --> 00:13:02
			have in mind this is
		
00:13:04 --> 00:13:08
			and to get experts on who could
explain their expertise in ways
		
00:13:08 --> 00:13:11
			that which we can all answer. So
I'm not just passively listening,
		
00:13:11 --> 00:13:13
			I'm hopefully engage in
conversation asking him to clarify
		
00:13:13 --> 00:13:16
			what they mean, are they difficult
terms allows them to define what
		
00:13:16 --> 00:13:20
			they mean. So that there is some
input, but I'm there very much
		
00:13:20 --> 00:13:26
			like the viewer, as a person who
is benefiting from their
		
00:13:26 --> 00:13:31
			expertise. And it's been, I can't
stress this enough, this has been
		
00:13:31 --> 00:13:35
			a huge privilege for me to meet
these people, including yourself
		
00:13:35 --> 00:13:38
			because you've been handled as a
guest. I can't stress how much a
		
00:13:38 --> 00:13:42
			privilege has been for me, and
I've learned so much as have many
		
00:13:42 --> 00:13:46
			other people, as you've alluded
to, before, I can imagine because
		
00:13:46 --> 00:13:51
			I watch your Alia, type videos.
And those were like three hours
		
00:13:51 --> 00:13:54
			part one and part two, when I
think there's part three even
		
00:13:56 --> 00:13:59
			there's like two and three hours.
So I can imagine you basically are
		
00:13:59 --> 00:14:02
			going to school for free
essentially, right? Yes, it's
		
00:14:02 --> 00:14:06
			Yeah, makes sense. It is it's a
free University. Dr. Alia, tie is
		
00:14:07 --> 00:14:11
			I don't embarrass the guy. He's a
friend of mine I met him is he is
		
00:14:11 --> 00:14:15
			such a talented man is appalling
as a polymath, by which I mean,
		
00:14:15 --> 00:14:19
			he's actually expert in multiple
subjects, including a biblical
		
00:14:19 --> 00:14:23
			Hebrew, New Testament Greek,
Arabic, English, obviously, Farsi
		
00:14:23 --> 00:14:28
			is expert on the Bible has a PhD
in it, and Islam. And this is a
		
00:14:28 --> 00:14:32
			unique, we're not very rare skill
set.
		
00:14:33 --> 00:14:38
			But so yeah, I have a huge fan of
his as well. And when I was as a
		
00:14:38 --> 00:14:39
			tuner back in February,
		
00:14:40 --> 00:14:43
			for several days, he invited me to
sit in on one of his classes where
		
00:14:43 --> 00:14:47
			he was doing the theology of
Judaism and I thought, Wow, what a
		
00:14:47 --> 00:14:51
			privilege set there. You know, my
jaw drops as I listen to this, and
		
00:14:51 --> 00:14:56
			he is witty in his classes during
term time as he is like, in the
		
00:14:56 --> 00:14:59
			rest of his life, he's actually
painting I mean, he's, he's not at
		
00:14:59 --> 00:14:59
			all boring.
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:03
			So your first few guests, were
these, these Christian scholars
		
00:15:03 --> 00:15:08
			study that talk about Christology.
So you have a deep interest in
		
00:15:08 --> 00:15:12
			Christian theology. Absolutely.
And and is that something that was
		
00:15:12 --> 00:15:16
			from your, from your? Were you
ever involved academically with
		
00:15:16 --> 00:15:18
			that? Or is it all personal?
		
00:15:19 --> 00:15:22
			It's always been personal, I
became a committed born again,
		
00:15:22 --> 00:15:25
			Christian, in my early 20s. And
evangelical actually.
		
00:15:26 --> 00:15:29
			And I immediately took to reading
the Bible, I loved the Bible, it
		
00:15:29 --> 00:15:32
			became a life for me the word of
God, and I believe it is inerrant.
		
00:15:32 --> 00:15:35
			So what many people call a
fundamentalist Christian.
		
00:15:37 --> 00:15:40
			And that was both my strength and
my weakness. The strength was I
		
00:15:40 --> 00:15:42
			took the Bible very seriously,
which we have to do in today's
		
00:15:42 --> 00:15:46
			world, even now, with events in
Palestine, the Bible has been used
		
00:15:46 --> 00:15:50
			across by many to weaponize
oppression of people but but also
		
00:15:50 --> 00:15:54
			because it is such an interesting
book, actually, it's a library of
		
00:15:54 --> 00:15:57
			books. But the problem was, and
this is the downside of it. The
		
00:15:57 --> 00:16:01
			more I read, the more I realized
that there were problems, big
		
00:16:01 --> 00:16:04
			problems with the Bible,
particularly the New Testament.
		
00:16:04 --> 00:16:09
			And so this is set me on a journey
of given my nature of accessing
		
00:16:09 --> 00:16:16
			biblical scholars in books, to try
and find answers. And that led me
		
00:16:16 --> 00:16:21
			to be an undergraduate studying
Christian theology University. So
		
00:16:21 --> 00:16:24
			I did study academically, but I've
always been interested in the
		
00:16:24 --> 00:16:28
			Bible. Still, I'm still reading it
now. Because it is, apart from the
		
00:16:28 --> 00:16:32
			Quran, of course, the world's most
important book, and in hugely
		
00:16:32 --> 00:16:34
			influential on the Western
tradition, the Western mindset
		
00:16:34 --> 00:16:38
			MEP, even people to secular, many
of the categories of thought that
		
00:16:38 --> 00:16:42
			they have and and assumptions
about reality, are still rooted in
		
00:16:42 --> 00:16:43
			parts of the Bible.
		
00:16:44 --> 00:16:47
			And so it's really important to
understand it anyway. Even if you
		
00:16:47 --> 00:16:50
			don't believe in God is important
to understand anything. Can you
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:54
			share some of those things that
you found to be start triggering
		
00:16:54 --> 00:16:57
			your mind that there are some
issues here? Yeah, I'm not going
		
00:16:57 --> 00:17:00
			to too technical. If you read the
gospels, and then Paul's letters,
		
00:17:01 --> 00:17:05
			if you read, say, the earliest
Gospel of Mark, it becomes
		
00:17:05 --> 00:17:08
			apparent in several places like
Mark chapter 13, that it looks
		
00:17:08 --> 00:17:13
			like Jesus foretold the Second
Coming the end of the world,
		
00:17:14 --> 00:17:17
			within the generation of people
then living in the first century.
		
00:17:17 --> 00:17:22
			And Mark 1330, if you go and look
it up, now you'll see all these
		
00:17:22 --> 00:17:25
			things it says will happen within
this generation. All these things
		
00:17:25 --> 00:17:29
			refers to the preceding narrative,
which includes the destruction of
		
00:17:29 --> 00:17:33
			the temple and at 70, and the
return of the Son of Man on the
		
00:17:33 --> 00:17:36
			clouds of glory. I thought this
can't be right. Because firstly,
		
00:17:36 --> 00:17:39
			the Bible that didn't happen when
2000 years later, also means Jesus
		
00:17:39 --> 00:17:42
			made a mistake. That can't happen
because Jesus is God, I believed.
		
00:17:42 --> 00:17:46
			So off I went to read New
Testament scholars, and I
		
00:17:46 --> 00:17:49
			discovered something pretty
startling in the last couple of
		
00:17:49 --> 00:17:52
			100 years. What's called
eschatology,
		
00:17:53 --> 00:17:57
			which is this study of the End
Times. And the the sense of
		
00:17:57 --> 00:18:01
			imminent eschatology we see in the
New Testament has been a central
		
00:18:01 --> 00:18:04
			theme in New Testament
scholarship. You know, what's the
		
00:18:04 --> 00:18:08
			Bible most scholars think in, in
some places has got it wrong.
		
00:18:08 --> 00:18:11
			Paul, for example, expects the end
of the world within his own
		
00:18:11 --> 00:18:15
			lifetime. But the later writers
don't Luke doesn't so much John
		
00:18:15 --> 00:18:19
			doesn't so much. It's complicated,
because the library, but this
		
00:18:19 --> 00:18:21
			shocked me, I thought, hang on,
there shouldn't be any mistakes,
		
00:18:21 --> 00:18:22
			especially not by Jesus.
		
00:18:24 --> 00:18:28
			So I went, I read, you know, Tom
Wright anti rights, and I go
		
00:18:28 --> 00:18:31
			through a long list of people I
read, commentary, I've read over
		
00:18:31 --> 00:18:35
			50, at least 50. Quiet, I stopped
counting after or at least 50
		
00:18:35 --> 00:18:41
			academic commentaries on Mark 13.
Alone. Yeah. And it's parallel
		
00:18:41 --> 00:18:45
			passages, Matthew 24, Luke 21, to
try and find an answer to this
		
00:18:45 --> 00:18:49
			thing, because it I find it
threatening to my face. So that
		
00:18:49 --> 00:18:51
			that was one is that there are
many obviously, the problem is
		
00:18:51 --> 00:18:53
			once you start reading a
scholarship, you discover other
		
00:18:53 --> 00:18:56
			issues that I wasn't aware of,
which then became problems
		
00:18:56 --> 00:18:59
			themselves example the nature of
the fourth gospel, the gospel of
		
00:18:59 --> 00:19:02
			John. And that was perhaps in
bigger threat,
		
00:19:03 --> 00:19:08
			academic stuff, but which your
average Christian has no idea
		
00:19:08 --> 00:19:11
			about, and yet all their scholars
do they know about these problems.
		
00:19:12 --> 00:19:16
			So part of my job on BT some
extent has been to share what
		
00:19:16 --> 00:19:20
			Christian scholars have been
saying about the Bible and share
		
00:19:20 --> 00:19:26
			that with Christians. So just so
people understand. The Bible is
		
00:19:26 --> 00:19:30
			not exactly the word is given to
Jesus directly. It's marked
		
00:19:30 --> 00:19:35
			Matthew Paul, these gospels are
essentially biographies
		
00:19:35 --> 00:19:41
			biographical accounts of Jesus.
Okay, so, what we would call like
		
00:19:41 --> 00:19:45
			Cyrano narrations, or narratives,
exactly the Injeel, the Gospel as
		
00:19:45 --> 00:19:49
			the crown calls it, is the gospel
given to Jesus. And actually, the
		
00:19:49 --> 00:19:53
			Bible says this too, if you look
at the same mark, you have, and
		
00:19:53 --> 00:19:57
			Jesus went around Galilee,
preaching the gospel, the gospel
		
00:19:57 --> 00:19:59
			wasn't the message about Jesus
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:03
			wasn't Christianity. It was the
gospel. And if you want to know
		
00:20:03 --> 00:20:06
			about it, you can read in the
gospels in the Bible today. So the
		
00:20:06 --> 00:20:09
			the four gospels don't even
pretend to be revelation. They
		
00:20:09 --> 00:20:12
			don't pretend to be inspired. And
he later gospel writers correct,
		
00:20:12 --> 00:20:16
			alter and amend and embellish
earlier gospels. So Matthew and
		
00:20:16 --> 00:20:21
			Luke famously correct mark on key
points, which is fascinating is
		
00:20:22 --> 00:20:24
			called redaction criticism in its
own in our own right. But the
		
00:20:24 --> 00:20:28
			gospel given to Jesus what he
preached is what Muslims believe
		
00:20:28 --> 00:20:32
			in. And scholars are made this
lovely distinction, which is so
		
00:20:32 --> 00:20:36
			important that there's the gospel
of Jesus. And then there's a
		
00:20:36 --> 00:20:40
			gospel about Jesus that makes
sense about Jesus is called
		
00:20:40 --> 00:20:45
			Christianity. The gospel of Jesus
is what Muslims believe in. And if
		
00:20:45 --> 00:20:48
			you look at the details, even in
the gospels, we have now you can
		
00:20:48 --> 00:20:54
			see the themes are the same. Yeah.
So now, you got into this, you
		
00:20:54 --> 00:20:58
			found some issues. I assume the
evangelical tradition is very
		
00:20:58 --> 00:21:05
			prejudiced against Islam and in
imbues in its people. An emotional
		
00:21:05 --> 00:21:08
			reaction towards Islam. It's one
of the greatest enemies. I just
		
00:21:08 --> 00:21:13
			was listening to some a gentleman,
very soft spoken gentleman, but he
		
00:21:13 --> 00:21:18
			was saying the Great Four
abominations are homosexuality,
		
00:21:20 --> 00:21:25
			listen to other things. And he
listed Islam as one of the four
		
00:21:25 --> 00:21:30
			great abominations to a Christian.
Okay, so Oh, he said,
		
00:21:30 --> 00:21:34
			homosexuality, abortion. Can't
remember the third one. And then
		
00:21:34 --> 00:21:39
			it was Islam was the fourth one.
So were you also did they imbibe
		
00:21:39 --> 00:21:42
			that inside of you to whoever the
Evangelicals that you were you
		
00:21:42 --> 00:21:45
			were keeping up with it's time?
Well, to some extent, yeah, I
		
00:21:45 --> 00:21:48
			mean, British evangelicalism is
much more
		
00:21:50 --> 00:21:53
			lukewarm, less extreme than the
American version. A lot of
		
00:21:53 --> 00:21:56
			American evangelicals, we know who
they are, they attack, many of
		
00:21:56 --> 00:22:00
			them attack Islam. British
evangelicals tend to be more mild
		
00:22:00 --> 00:22:03
			for some reason. Everything about
the British is more mild, right?
		
00:22:03 --> 00:22:05
			That's what we like to think. And,
		
00:22:06 --> 00:22:10
			and except when it comes to
supporting states like Israel,
		
00:22:10 --> 00:22:12
			then we're quite happy to send
them arms and give them political
		
00:22:12 --> 00:22:17
			cover, which has not been mild at
all. It's quite evil. Anyway. So
		
00:22:17 --> 00:22:21
			yeah, I agree. And I think one of
the reasons though, apart from
		
00:22:21 --> 00:22:25
			racism, Islamophobia, just sheer
bigotry, but there's actually a
		
00:22:25 --> 00:22:28
			theological reason, and that these
evangelicals believe that I have
		
00:22:28 --> 00:22:30
			particular understanding of
Christianity, which means that
		
00:22:30 --> 00:22:33
			anything that comes after
Christianity and their view, which
		
00:22:33 --> 00:22:38
			denies say, the divinity of Jesus,
must be evil, by definition,
		
00:22:38 --> 00:22:41
			because it's denying a central
truth of the Christianity. So they
		
00:22:41 --> 00:22:46
			have a theological motivation, you
know, as well, but they tend to
		
00:22:46 --> 00:22:51
			obviously defame and speak evil of
a lie. Actually, I've noticed
		
00:22:51 --> 00:22:54
			about Islam as well. So they make
it they make their objections a
		
00:22:54 --> 00:22:59
			lot worse than they could have
been, I think. And so were you
		
00:22:59 --> 00:23:03
			with a group? Or were you just
going solo on this? Oh, no, I,
		
00:23:03 --> 00:23:08
			that's the curious thing, really.
I never publicly, publicly ever
		
00:23:08 --> 00:23:12
			express my views about Islam, I
expressed my concerns to fellow
		
00:23:12 --> 00:23:16
			Christians, I remember, or a
couple of them in my church, who I
		
00:23:16 --> 00:23:21
			did, you know, express my great
alarm about Islam and Muslims,
		
00:23:21 --> 00:23:25
			particularly in London here. But I
never expressed it on social, so
		
00:23:25 --> 00:23:29
			nothing like that at all. So then
you're with a group of people. And
		
00:23:29 --> 00:23:31
			I don't want to say the word herd
mentality. But that's usually what
		
00:23:31 --> 00:23:34
			group mentality, we could say.
group mentality is very strong,
		
00:23:34 --> 00:23:38
			when everyone in the group has the
same kind of loves and hates. It's
		
00:23:38 --> 00:23:42
			very strong to come out of that.
So how did you eventually come out
		
00:23:42 --> 00:23:46
			of that into eventually
investigating Islam?
		
00:23:48 --> 00:23:50
			Yeah, it's not. It's not a very
interesting story, really. But
		
00:23:50 --> 00:23:56
			it's how I embraced Islam. So at
some point, I became quite as
		
00:23:56 --> 00:24:01
			homophobic as I say, in my own
mind. And I decided to, because I
		
00:24:01 --> 00:24:06
			was just, I already had learned
that the media, for example, often
		
00:24:06 --> 00:24:09
			don't fairly represent positions,
which I knew were quite different.
		
00:24:09 --> 00:24:12
			For example, on Christianity, I
thought that often you get sort of
		
00:24:13 --> 00:24:18
			misunderstanding. I thought, well,
maybe I misunderstood Islam. Maybe
		
00:24:18 --> 00:24:22
			the media used to read I don't
know watch the BBC or whatever,
		
00:24:22 --> 00:24:26
			Daily Mail. And so I thought I'd
investigate this but it's also a
		
00:24:26 --> 00:24:29
			curious as wants to learn more
about Islam. So I bought a
		
00:24:29 --> 00:24:33
			dreadful translation with the
crown. And, and that didn't work.
		
00:24:33 --> 00:24:36
			I just couldn't, I couldn't even
engage with the Crown at all. But
		
00:24:36 --> 00:24:40
			I did then go to my local mosque
here at Regent's Park Mosque,
		
00:24:40 --> 00:24:41
			which is,
		
00:24:42 --> 00:24:46
			you know, pretty important mosque
actually in Britain, and just
		
00:24:46 --> 00:24:48
			walked through the door and I
thought I'd give myself three
		
00:24:48 --> 00:24:51
			months. I'm going to talk to some
Muslims read some of their stuff.
		
00:24:51 --> 00:24:53
			And then at least I would have
made the effort to learn more
		
00:24:53 --> 00:24:56
			about this religion, which I
thought was profoundly wrong.
		
00:24:56 --> 00:24:56
			Yeah.
		
00:24:58 --> 00:25:00
			So I walked in the door there and
on the
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:03
			right hand side, you know, the
Masters bookstore are books, I
		
00:25:03 --> 00:25:07
			recognize that so you know when,
and some kind Muslim brother
		
00:25:07 --> 00:25:12
			bought me a heap full of books,
and a good translation of the
		
00:25:12 --> 00:25:16
			Quran. And and that started me on
a journey I went back there, I
		
00:25:16 --> 00:25:20
			argued with one or two Muslims
that I was a Christian, I believe
		
00:25:20 --> 00:25:25
			in Christianity. And but over time
I discovered something I didn't
		
00:25:25 --> 00:25:28
			because of my evangelical
prejudice and dogma. It's
		
00:25:28 --> 00:25:31
			embarrassing to say this now, but
I'm sure this is true of many
		
00:25:31 --> 00:25:34
			evangelicals. I actually
discovered that Islam has an
		
00:25:34 --> 00:25:38
			incredibly deep and rich spiritual
tradition, which easily rivals
		
00:25:38 --> 00:25:40
			that of Christianity, because I
knew in Christianity we have
		
00:25:40 --> 00:25:44
			Thomas Aquinas, Thomas, a Becket,
Julian, at Norwich, the author of
		
00:25:44 --> 00:25:47
			the Cloud of Unknowing, the
amazing works of St. Augustine,
		
00:25:47 --> 00:25:52
			etc, etc, that Islam has a
parallels built tradition of equal
		
00:25:52 --> 00:25:56
			profundity, but like much, much
more of it's actually, I mean,
		
00:25:57 --> 00:25:59
			even going to like Rumi and
everything. You know, there's a
		
00:25:59 --> 00:26:02
			huge tradition, which goes back
many, many centuries. And this is
		
00:26:02 --> 00:26:05
			really impressed me and I
recognize commonalities and
		
00:26:05 --> 00:26:09
			similarities between the two
traditions, actually. And then I
		
00:26:09 --> 00:26:11
			that kind of woke me up to a
paradigm shift.
		
00:26:12 --> 00:26:18
			Hang on, if if Christian mysticism
or spirituality can speak
		
00:26:18 --> 00:26:22
			profoundly of the nature of God
and our lives, and Islam is doing
		
00:26:22 --> 00:26:25
			something quite similar in many
ways. Maybe there's a lot of truth
		
00:26:25 --> 00:26:26
			of Islam.
		
00:26:28 --> 00:26:31
			And then, and then I came across
something which I didn't expect to
		
00:26:31 --> 00:26:34
			find, which made the biggest
impact on me, other than reading
		
00:26:34 --> 00:26:38
			the Quran, was the life of the
prophet Muhammad upon him up, I
		
00:26:38 --> 00:26:42
			read the amazing Syrah by Martin
lings. And that blew my mind and I
		
00:26:42 --> 00:26:46
			thought, oh, okay, okay, okay. You
know, he looks like a prophet
		
00:26:46 --> 00:26:48
			talks, like a prophet speaks like
a prophet behaves like a prophet.
		
00:26:49 --> 00:26:54
			Why am I not believing he said, My
God. And that was a revealing
		
00:26:54 --> 00:26:57
			moment, then I encountered the
problem within myself.
		
00:26:58 --> 00:27:02
			I knew that if I accept that he
was a prophet, that would mean I
		
00:27:02 --> 00:27:03
			would become a Muslim.
		
00:27:06 --> 00:27:09
			And that would mean a, a, an
existential change of civilization
		
00:27:09 --> 00:27:14
			or over cross over thresholds, red
lines, in my own life, as a white
		
00:27:14 --> 00:27:19
			male middle class, majoritarian
person in England, moving a small,
		
00:27:19 --> 00:27:23
			often despised ethnic minority
community. And that made me hold
		
00:27:23 --> 00:27:26
			back for some months and thinking,
do I really do actually really
		
00:27:26 --> 00:27:30
			want to do this at all? Because
I'm quite comfortable where I am.
		
00:27:30 --> 00:27:31
			Thank you very much.
		
00:27:32 --> 00:27:35
			So Hamdulillah, I did ultimately
get the courage by the grace of
		
00:27:35 --> 00:27:40
			God to say the shahada at Regent's
Park. So you're this story. It's
		
00:27:40 --> 00:27:45
			very intellectual. It's, it's
between you and books. More so
		
00:27:45 --> 00:27:49
			then, you know, there was a kind
man on the street and even like,
		
00:27:50 --> 00:27:52
			big intellectuals like shit, no,
Hamid Keller.
		
00:27:54 --> 00:27:59
			He says that he was he was moved
into Islam by three things. All of
		
00:27:59 --> 00:28:04
			them were interactions one time
one moment interactions with
		
00:28:04 --> 00:28:08
			regular Muslims on the street.
Like one per one woman saw he was
		
00:28:08 --> 00:28:12
			so dusty and disheveled she and
she was very poor. And she took
		
00:28:12 --> 00:28:14
			money from her pocket and put in
his hand, right?
		
00:28:15 --> 00:28:21
			Things like that. So but yours
seems to be between you and books
		
00:28:21 --> 00:28:24
			and ideas, and you're thinking on
your own? I think well, yeah.
		
00:28:24 --> 00:28:30
			Books, I think, yes. It by that
one means a deep engagement with
		
00:28:30 --> 00:28:34
			truth. Yeah, I don't need to come
across as a cerebral exercise. It
		
00:28:34 --> 00:28:38
			wasn't hard. Don't get me wrong.
But it wasn't just that it was a
		
00:28:38 --> 00:28:41
			much deeper, transformative
encounter with the truth,
		
00:28:42 --> 00:28:46
			actually, and with the, the Great,
the great. In fact, there's a book
		
00:28:46 --> 00:28:49
			I read, and I've always always
flogging this book. It's like the
		
00:28:49 --> 00:28:53
			destiny of man by the English
writer guide. And when I started
		
00:28:53 --> 00:28:57
			to read that book, I was I was, I
was a convinced Christian when I
		
00:28:57 --> 00:29:00
			finished reading that book, I was
a Muslim, in my heart,
		
00:29:02 --> 00:29:06
			intellectually I hadn't. So it the
way he communicated a profound
		
00:29:06 --> 00:29:09
			understanding of Islamic
spirituality of the life of the
		
00:29:09 --> 00:29:13
			prophet in the Quran, and the and
the Islamic worldview. Once I let
		
00:29:13 --> 00:29:16
			that really impact me, it
transformed me.
		
00:29:18 --> 00:29:22
			So I wouldn't want buy a book
conversion. See, as a bookish guy.
		
00:29:22 --> 00:29:26
			It wasn't it was much deeper than
that. You you're reading a lot.
		
00:29:27 --> 00:29:28
			Are you a writer as well?
		
00:29:30 --> 00:29:31
			Well, I I write tweets.
		
00:29:34 --> 00:29:37
			Do you have an actual blog with
essays?
		
00:29:38 --> 00:29:43
			I have actually written essays.
Yeah. So I don't tend to. I do.
		
00:29:43 --> 00:29:48
			Yes. Okay. Yeah, I mean, I have
written on some more academic
		
00:29:48 --> 00:29:50
			stuff, but I don't tend to do a
lot of that because a lot of my
		
00:29:50 --> 00:29:54
			time is spent with interviewing
real academics. So I feel that
		
00:29:54 --> 00:29:58
			they should obviously be deferred
to but yeah, I do occasionally
		
00:29:58 --> 00:29:59
			write things when people enter
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:05
			Come and to Islam in our Masjid. I
give them Abdel Halim you know,
		
00:30:05 --> 00:30:08
			Professor Abdul Halim is maybe 10
minutes from you, right? What do
		
00:30:08 --> 00:30:12
			you say to this which is the give
them that because that is the
		
00:30:12 --> 00:30:14
			easiest translation of the Quran
to read.
		
00:30:16 --> 00:30:19
			You know, I think this is the
easiest now just want to clear the
		
00:30:19 --> 00:30:24
			clear crown clear. We received we
somebody sent us a whole box of
		
00:30:24 --> 00:30:26
			those so we give them out now to
		
00:30:28 --> 00:30:30
			you know what I don't give out
though, and it bothers me to
		
00:30:30 --> 00:30:36
			death. i We don't have a 100 page
biography of the Prophet peace be
		
00:30:36 --> 00:30:41
			upon him. Every biography of the
Prophet is very long. Okay. Karen
		
00:30:41 --> 00:30:46
			Armstrong's is a good biography to
write, but it's not one of those
		
00:30:46 --> 00:30:51
			that's readily available on
Amazon. And I would like to give
		
00:30:51 --> 00:30:55
			them a short biography. Now, you
just said that one of your biggest
		
00:30:55 --> 00:31:01
			turning points was the Sunnah of
the Prophet peace be upon him. You
		
00:31:01 --> 00:31:06
			are a convert, you know, your your
your your people better than a
		
00:31:06 --> 00:31:10
			born Muslim would know. What do
you think of the idea of writing a
		
00:31:10 --> 00:31:13
			100 page biography of the prophet
for new Muslims?
		
00:31:15 --> 00:31:17
			Well, I wasn't expecting that
question.
		
00:31:19 --> 00:31:22
			I'm not the person to do that. I'm
not qualified to do that. I think
		
00:31:22 --> 00:31:25
			a prerequisite on the corner Karen
Armstrong doesn't have this
		
00:31:25 --> 00:31:28
			prerequisite for this. She She's
unusual. The prerequisite for
		
00:31:28 --> 00:31:32
			writing a blog is doing a zero b
knowledge of Arabic.
		
00:31:33 --> 00:31:36
			And I think when I was in high
school earlier this year, I read
		
00:31:36 --> 00:31:41
			Dr. Yasser, cardies, new Sera,
which is very accessible and
		
00:31:41 --> 00:31:44
			readable. And so I just
		
00:31:46 --> 00:31:49
			I'm not a page fetishist. I think
I don't know why we had
		
00:31:50 --> 00:31:53
			this. Yeah, but you see, I mean,
it all depends how big the font
		
00:31:53 --> 00:31:56
			is, and how thick the pages are.
How many words I mean, that's
		
00:31:56 --> 00:31:59
			deceptive. You can shrink the
pages and by changing the fonts
		
00:31:59 --> 00:32:04
			and the font size, so true. I
think we have now just my personal
		
00:32:04 --> 00:32:07
			opinion, I think now in English,
we have an abundance of Syrah of
		
00:32:07 --> 00:32:11
			excellent quality. And I'm also
against just having one standard
		
00:32:11 --> 00:32:14
			Syrah. I think it has to be
because there is such a choice.
		
00:32:14 --> 00:32:19
			Now, if I had a quite a quite an
educated English lady or
		
00:32:19 --> 00:32:24
			gentleman. Yeah, I'd recommend
Martin lings. I just won't forget
		
00:32:24 --> 00:32:27
			all the others, however good.
Because of the standard of
		
00:32:27 --> 00:32:30
			language, the eloquence the beauty
of the language, we find it
		
00:32:30 --> 00:32:33
			enlightening, but I wouldn't
recommend that to a lot of other
		
00:32:33 --> 00:32:35
			people because it is quite
challenging to read if you're not
		
00:32:35 --> 00:32:36
			used to that kind of
		
00:32:37 --> 00:32:42
			old fashioned if I can use that
word English. So yes, I carry a
		
00:32:42 --> 00:32:45
			much more wider audience, I think,
much more demotic.
		
00:32:46 --> 00:32:49
			And Karen Armstrong again, but
you've had a Christian I would say
		
00:32:49 --> 00:32:52
			recurrent arms because she's not a
Muslim, and yet managed to convey
		
00:32:52 --> 00:32:55
			successfully an awful lot of facts
and truth about the Prophet in a
		
00:32:55 --> 00:32:58
			way that isn't prejudice and agree
with everything she says one or
		
00:32:58 --> 00:33:00
			two bits where she gets a bit
anyway, but she's very, very good.
		
00:33:01 --> 00:33:04
			So it depends on who one is
speaking to in terms of
		
00:33:04 --> 00:33:09
			recommending a particular sera Do
you see non Muslims and Christians
		
00:33:09 --> 00:33:14
			now and an ever have a in person
Dawa type of a relationship with
		
00:33:14 --> 00:33:19
			them? Yeah, all the time? And
where would where's the where's
		
00:33:19 --> 00:33:21
			the platform for that? Is it like
a Speaker's Corner thing? Or?
		
00:33:22 --> 00:33:24
			Yeah, I mean, last Sunday, a
couple days ago, I had a long
		
00:33:24 --> 00:33:27
			conversation which was filmed you
can see it on YouTube with a, an
		
00:33:27 --> 00:33:28
			American missionary.
		
00:33:30 --> 00:33:30
			And,
		
00:33:31 --> 00:33:35
			and that was difficult for me,
because the How can I put the the
		
00:33:35 --> 00:33:39
			asymmetry in knowledge between the
two was pretty extreme.
		
00:33:40 --> 00:33:43
			But you can make up your own mind
what happened there? And then
		
00:33:43 --> 00:33:48
			another American from California,
who says he's a fan of blogging
		
00:33:48 --> 00:33:51
			theology, you says, I'm not sure I
believe him. Really. They said he
		
00:33:51 --> 00:33:52
			came to them just to meet me.
		
00:33:53 --> 00:33:59
			I don't and because anyway, he was
very different. He was very
		
00:33:59 --> 00:34:04
			intelligent, very respectful. And
patient. I was his, I was very
		
00:34:04 --> 00:34:07
			happy to talk to him indeed, and
we did for an hour or so. That's
		
00:34:07 --> 00:34:10
			also on YouTube from last Sunday.
		
00:34:11 --> 00:34:15
			And his questions were much more
scholarly and technical. And I
		
00:34:15 --> 00:34:18
			find this much more interesting
actually. A lot of people have us
		
00:34:18 --> 00:34:21
			in the data world in the YouTube
world will know about Speaker's
		
00:34:21 --> 00:34:25
			Corner. But can you tell those who
don't? What is Speaker's Corner
		
00:34:25 --> 00:34:27
			and whites has a role in Dawa?
		
00:34:28 --> 00:34:32
			Gosh, that's a good yes, indeed.
It does, actually, for good or
		
00:34:32 --> 00:34:37
			ill. So, Speaker's Corner, so
called is in London in England,
		
00:34:37 --> 00:34:41
			and it's part of a park a public
park called Hyde Park that
		
00:34:41 --> 00:34:44
			literally a mile from where I'm
sitting, it takes me 20 minutes to
		
00:34:44 --> 00:34:46
			walk down there, which is why it's
so easy for me just to get down
		
00:34:46 --> 00:34:49
			there on a Sunday only meets on
one day, a week on a Sunday.
		
00:34:50 --> 00:34:53
			And it's not there because the
park authorities are being nice or
		
00:34:53 --> 00:34:57
			the police want you to turn up or
anyone is there by law in the 19th
		
00:34:57 --> 00:34:59
			century, during the convulsions
		
00:35:00 --> 00:35:00
			of
		
00:35:02 --> 00:35:04
			when the trade union movement was
was beginning in England,
		
00:35:06 --> 00:35:09
			many militant workers were
struggling for their rights and
		
00:35:09 --> 00:35:15
			recognition and social justice
demonstrated in this park. And and
		
00:35:15 --> 00:35:18
			at the beginning, they were quite
brutally suppressed by the police.
		
00:35:19 --> 00:35:23
			So the government is parliament
decided to pass a law to set aside
		
00:35:23 --> 00:35:27
			that area of the park, where
speakers could actually speak with
		
00:35:27 --> 00:35:30
			with complete freedom without the
police arresting them without
		
00:35:30 --> 00:35:34
			anyone interfering. So it's
actually there by statute. So the
		
00:35:34 --> 00:35:36
			police can't close it down or
anything special except for
		
00:35:36 --> 00:35:40
			really, really good reasons. Like
during COVID. Sadie was closed
		
00:35:40 --> 00:35:44
			briefly. So so people are going
there, obviously, if he is Karl
		
00:35:44 --> 00:35:50
			Marx went there. Oswald Mosley
went there, who else? George
		
00:35:50 --> 00:35:54
			Orwell, the famous writer went
there. Lots of very famous people
		
00:35:54 --> 00:35:56
			Lenin went there. Actually, he's
on record. He lived in London for
		
00:35:56 --> 00:35:59
			a while. And when speakers go on,
you hear Lenin's Can you imagine?
		
00:36:01 --> 00:36:04
			So, but in recent years, it's
become because of the local
		
00:36:04 --> 00:36:08
			demography and other reasons is we
can quite heavily Muslim and put
		
00:36:08 --> 00:36:12
			it that way. And also, with the
advent of social media and
		
00:36:12 --> 00:36:17
			cameras, and iPhones, like my, you
know, people have started to
		
00:36:17 --> 00:36:23
			upload recordings of their and now
I'm told in the world, but you
		
00:36:23 --> 00:36:26
			know, there are hundreds of
millions of people who have
		
00:36:26 --> 00:36:30
			watched videos, they're translated
into subtitles into Arabic.
		
00:36:31 --> 00:36:36
			And it's made celebrities like
Shamsi, the the Salafi speaker is
		
00:36:36 --> 00:36:39
			very, very well known. I can go a
long, long list of people that
		
00:36:39 --> 00:36:42
			whether it be Muhammad hijab, or
you know, who'd been there and
		
00:36:42 --> 00:36:43
			still go there, actually.
		
00:36:44 --> 00:36:49
			But I would say, mainly, I would
say it's toxic, I would say
		
00:36:49 --> 00:36:56
			mainly, it's bad, because there's
often not much positive discourse
		
00:36:56 --> 00:37:00
			going on, let alone down. Or often
it can be quite, particularly with
		
00:37:00 --> 00:37:02
			some of the, some of the
Christians there are
		
00:37:03 --> 00:37:08
			a very, very extreme, and they
will insult the Prophet and so on.
		
00:37:08 --> 00:37:11
			So you really have to be tough
skinned, and not take offense, at
		
00:37:11 --> 00:37:17
			least not react anyway. Because
it's protected by law. So how does
		
00:37:17 --> 00:37:22
			this work? Exactly? So like from
as soon as the daylight is up,
		
00:37:23 --> 00:37:27
			people start going there randomly,
and picking a corner and taking an
		
00:37:27 --> 00:37:31
			area and making it there's and
speaking? Yeah, it's just a corner
		
00:37:31 --> 00:37:35
			of the park. So there's no like
gate or entrance fee or a
		
00:37:35 --> 00:37:38
			policeman saying, Hey, we started.
It takes place on Sunday by
		
00:37:38 --> 00:37:42
			tradition. So people just turn up
at some point on Monday could turn
		
00:37:42 --> 00:37:45
			up before the thing is, if you
turn up before dawn on us day, you
		
00:37:45 --> 00:37:48
			could do that. But I wouldn't
imagine that anyone would be
		
00:37:48 --> 00:37:51
			there. So it usually turn off
about two to three o'clock in the
		
00:37:51 --> 00:37:55
			afternoon when you get most people
have arrived. And then because I
		
00:37:55 --> 00:37:58
			have a number of friends there who
I just like to chat to anyway, so
		
00:37:58 --> 00:38:03
			there's social sites. And like
this one, they just gone. I met to
		
00:38:03 --> 00:38:04
			American.
		
00:38:05 --> 00:38:09
			One was a mission. The other one
was an Enquirer. And particularly
		
00:38:09 --> 00:38:11
			that I hear people approached me.
		
00:38:12 --> 00:38:17
			And sometimes I you know, listen,
as well to discussions or debates.
		
00:38:18 --> 00:38:22
			And you can you can learn there
can be some quite good debates and
		
00:38:22 --> 00:38:27
			discussion sometimes. Do you see
shadows around there? No, no, I
		
00:38:27 --> 00:38:31
			would say that's quite rare.
Ironically, there's a lot of work
		
00:38:31 --> 00:38:36
			going on on the streets of London,
actually an awful lot. And I can
		
00:38:36 --> 00:38:40
			tell you, because I've seen it
myself many times. It is hugely
		
00:38:40 --> 00:38:44
			successful. I mean, just up the
road from here about a mile north
		
00:38:44 --> 00:38:48
			in Kilburn, there's $1 store that
you're going for years, you get
		
00:38:48 --> 00:38:50
			numerous shahada every
		
00:38:51 --> 00:38:54
			it's amazing, actually, just on
the general public, the Speaker's
		
00:38:54 --> 00:38:57
			Corner is different. And I think
it's because it's such a toxic
		
00:38:57 --> 00:39:01
			toxic atmosphere, you can't really
have it's very difficult to have a
		
00:39:01 --> 00:39:05
			good heart to heart and authentic
interact, you're human, you're
		
00:39:05 --> 00:39:08
			there to, you know, refute the
missionaries. The missionaries are
		
00:39:08 --> 00:39:12
			there to destroy Islam or
whatever, you know, it is not the
		
00:39:12 --> 00:39:17
			right place. And are they there so
there's no prayer there so there's
		
00:39:17 --> 00:39:20
			no Christian group that setting
that's praying and you get to
		
00:39:20 --> 00:39:23
			witness their prayer and and a
Muslim group witnessing their
		
00:39:23 --> 00:39:27
			prayer that doesn't exist. It
doesn't know a prayer Krishna said
		
00:39:28 --> 00:39:32
			Muslims do pray in pray Salah then
CONGREGATION But there's an area
		
00:39:32 --> 00:39:35
			very very very close to it where
the police have said you know, you
		
00:39:36 --> 00:39:40
			you're not supposed to pray in the
Speaker's Corner because because a
		
00:39:40 --> 00:39:44
			huge part you can pay anywhere but
it because it kind of interferes
		
00:39:44 --> 00:39:48
			with the smooth running of
Speaker's Corner. I see. Good now
		
00:39:48 --> 00:39:52
			let's get to your YouTube channel.
How many interviews are you on
		
00:39:52 --> 00:39:56
			right now? What what number of
interviews is the next idea? I
		
00:39:56 --> 00:40:00
			have no idea. It's nearly 1000
videos. I already am
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:04
			Imagine I'd have a rough guess
about half of those, probably more
		
00:40:04 --> 00:40:08
			than half are actual videos I used
to do. So you started with the
		
00:40:08 --> 00:40:12
			Christian scholars. What was your
first Muslim interview?
		
00:40:13 --> 00:40:17
			Gosh, do you know I don't know the
answer to that I'd need to check.
		
00:40:19 --> 00:40:24
			I mean, I can check now but I, I
don't remember I'm just scrolling
		
00:40:24 --> 00:40:28
			through my old stuff now and just
trying to find an answer but I
		
00:40:28 --> 00:40:30
			don't know the answer that no
problem.
		
00:40:31 --> 00:40:37
			So, Alia Thai as your video here,
Alia Thai discusses Isaiah 53. And
		
00:40:37 --> 00:40:41
			James and Paul, that was two years
ago. Oh, wow. He might even have
		
00:40:41 --> 00:40:45
			the truth about selfies revealed I
interviewed a Saudi Sheikh Hassan
		
00:40:45 --> 00:40:48
			Somali is actually an American who
lives in the state of
		
00:40:48 --> 00:40:49
			Pennsylvania.
		
00:40:50 --> 00:40:52
			But although he's actually British
originally,
		
00:40:53 --> 00:40:56
			Alia tied before I think Alia tie
was the earliest.
		
00:40:57 --> 00:41:01
			Surprisingly, so some of these,
some of these interviews are
		
00:41:01 --> 00:41:06
			actually our Sorry, sorry, some of
your videos are not interviews.
		
00:41:06 --> 00:41:09
			They're like compilations that you
made,
		
00:41:10 --> 00:41:14
			like Deputy Mayor of Jerusalem
calls for genocide. When I click
		
00:41:14 --> 00:41:18
			on that, I'm gonna get like a
compilation and your commentary.
		
00:41:19 --> 00:41:23
			Yes. Oh, yeah, I do. Yeah, there
are several kinds of categories of
		
00:41:23 --> 00:41:27
			thing of stuff work that I do that
has evolved naturally, organically
		
00:41:27 --> 00:41:31
			over the last two, two years. And
so obviously, there's setpiece
		
00:41:31 --> 00:41:36
			interviews, which I really liked.
And then the other Another
		
00:41:36 --> 00:41:36
			category is
		
00:41:38 --> 00:41:43
			kind of my own social commentary.
So if an event happens, or like
		
00:41:43 --> 00:41:47
			you mentioned, I will try and
think of that I feel it I actually
		
00:41:47 --> 00:41:48
			want to comment on
		
00:41:50 --> 00:41:54
			and they usually much shorter, say
20 minutes, half an hour. Yep.
		
00:41:54 --> 00:41:58
			Very good. If you're on Instagram,
or, or you're just joining us on
		
00:41:58 --> 00:42:02
			YouTube, our guest is Paul
Williams, out of London, he runs a
		
00:42:02 --> 00:42:06
			website, a YouTube channel called
blogging theology, where he has
		
00:42:06 --> 00:42:10
			interviewed numerous numerous
Christian and Muslim scholars and
		
00:42:10 --> 00:42:14
			he has clips, he's got a very,
very successful YouTube channel.
		
00:42:14 --> 00:42:17
			And he's also has a very
successful
		
00:42:18 --> 00:42:21
			Twitter handle. So check it out at
blogging theology, or at Paul
		
00:42:21 --> 00:42:25
			Williams, free monotheist on
Twitter. Eric, your Twitter handle
		
00:42:25 --> 00:42:28
			is called Three monotheists. His
channel on YouTube is called
		
00:42:29 --> 00:42:32
			blogging, theology. If you're on
Instagram, hop over to YouTube, so
		
00:42:32 --> 00:42:36
			you can see the full picture. Let
me ask you this question. What is
		
00:42:36 --> 00:42:41
			your criterion when you invite one
of your guests? What's the
		
00:42:41 --> 00:42:44
			criteria in there? What's the
thought pattern behind that? It
		
00:42:44 --> 00:42:47
			depends on the guest, I have a
number of guests handlers that I
		
00:42:47 --> 00:42:51
			see regularly now not advertised
one of them. So we're in contact
		
00:42:51 --> 00:42:54
			on WhatsApp. And, you know, he may
come up with an idea or I might
		
00:42:54 --> 00:42:58
			invite him on discuss a particular
subject. And Dr. Louis for too is
		
00:42:58 --> 00:43:03
			another one. There's kind of a
group of of people who kindly come
		
00:43:03 --> 00:43:04
			on periodically, at least.
		
00:43:06 --> 00:43:10
			But other than that, perhaps a
bigger source is my own reading.
		
00:43:10 --> 00:43:15
			So, you know, I come across
authors and books that I've really
		
00:43:15 --> 00:43:17
			appreciated and would love to
speak to the author of those 10
		
00:43:17 --> 00:43:22
			books. So I just simply email them
and say, Can you join me Come on?
		
00:43:22 --> 00:43:25
			And the other time they say yes,
some of the time they say no,
		
00:43:26 --> 00:43:28
			you've had earlier today, you had
a lot of Muslims, obviously,
		
00:43:28 --> 00:43:30
			you've had discussed
		
00:43:32 --> 00:43:35
			a lot of biblical things with him.
Judaism with him. Have you had any
		
00:43:35 --> 00:43:42
			rabbis on? Yes. Just when I had to
actually Rabbi Toby, a singer, who
		
00:43:42 --> 00:43:46
			is based in Jerusalem now. He has
been hugely popular amongst
		
00:43:46 --> 00:43:50
			Muslims. He is, is another genius
when it comes to
		
00:43:51 --> 00:43:53
			dealing with Christian
missionaries. And their
		
00:43:53 --> 00:43:55
			misrepresentations of the Torah
		
00:43:56 --> 00:44:00
			was a genius. I mean, he's not
only technically masterful with
		
00:44:00 --> 00:44:04
			Hebrew, but his ability to
communicate clearly. And
		
00:44:04 --> 00:44:08
			intelligently on issues is very,
very special. So yeah, I had him
		
00:44:08 --> 00:44:12
			on. And there's another academic
in New York, a professor that
		
00:44:12 --> 00:44:16
			whose embarrassingly name I can't
remember, I had him on once a
		
00:44:16 --> 00:44:16
			couple of years ago,
		
00:44:18 --> 00:44:23
			that he's a proper academic who
discussed Judaism. There is a
		
00:44:23 --> 00:44:28
			Hasidic Jewish rabbi, from the
Satmar. You're familiar if you're
		
00:44:28 --> 00:44:31
			enough for those not familiar with
the Satmar Jews, they live in
		
00:44:31 --> 00:44:36
			Williamsburg in Brooklyn. And
they're very insular. They don't.
		
00:44:36 --> 00:44:39
			They don't engage a lot in the
world, but they're also very
		
00:44:39 --> 00:44:44
			deeply anti Zionist, and they
believe the entire project of
		
00:44:44 --> 00:44:48
			Israel is sinful, and has nothing
to do with Judaism and is a
		
00:44:48 --> 00:44:53
			hijacking of Zionism. This is
based upon their, the ancient or
		
00:44:53 --> 00:44:57
			not an ancient, I should say, the,
maybe three generations ago there.
		
00:44:57 --> 00:44:59
			Rabbi Teitelbaum from Austria.
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:06
			Who, who had this belief? They
came to to Williamsburg in
		
00:45:06 --> 00:45:11
			Brooklyn, after the Holocaust, and
they set up shop here. We're
		
00:45:11 --> 00:45:13
			trying to interview somebody, I
think you would also
		
00:45:15 --> 00:45:19
			love to talk to him. If you watch
the videos of Jakob Shapiro. He's
		
00:45:19 --> 00:45:23
			one of the most thoughtful rabbis
he communicates excellently. And
		
00:45:23 --> 00:45:29
			he's from the Satmar tradition.
And he distills and explains very
		
00:45:29 --> 00:45:35
			clearly. Why is it that these Jews
feel that Zionism is in fact,
		
00:45:35 --> 00:45:40
			against the Torah? And is it
sinful in its nature? Exactly. And
		
00:45:40 --> 00:45:42
			in fact, it remains historical
facts I mean, Alia Thai has
		
00:45:42 --> 00:45:47
			mentioned quite correctly is that
until relatively recently, far,
		
00:45:47 --> 00:45:52
			the vast majority of Orthodox Jews
were auto, also anti Zionist. It's
		
00:45:52 --> 00:45:55
			relatively recently that there's
been this huge conversion amongst
		
00:45:55 --> 00:45:59
			Jews, generally to be very
militantly pros. That is, wasn't
		
00:45:59 --> 00:46:06
			the case. It was a heresy as a
false idea by most Jews. And so
		
00:46:06 --> 00:46:09
			that because once you were
obviously once the State of Israel
		
00:46:09 --> 00:46:13
			was founded, and so on, and after
that, things began to change. But
		
00:46:13 --> 00:46:16
			the the idea itself was seen as
completely and Jewish. If you
		
00:46:16 --> 00:46:21
			imagine, to bring this closer to
Muslims, imagine if the whatever
		
00:46:21 --> 00:46:23
			the reformed, progressive
		
00:46:24 --> 00:46:27
			or Muslim organization out there,
or that group of people, these
		
00:46:27 --> 00:46:31
			like totally reformed, totally
progressive Muslims. They're not
		
00:46:31 --> 00:46:33
			that many, but they make a lot of
noise online. They seem to
		
00:46:33 --> 00:46:36
			disappear every once in a while in
England itself. You had
		
00:46:38 --> 00:46:41
			Quilliam Foundation, what a Muslim
organization, but they were
		
00:46:41 --> 00:46:45
			dominantly very liberal, very,
very liberal, and they all
		
00:46:45 --> 00:46:48
			disappeared. In fact, one of them
actually made Toba and is now
		
00:46:48 --> 00:46:52
			Alexa Bundy in Malaysia. Right,
which is good for him. Yeah,
		
00:46:52 --> 00:46:59
			what's his name? The Pakistani
gentleman, what was his name? I
		
00:46:59 --> 00:47:01
			can't remember his name. He was
very provocative, extremely
		
00:47:01 --> 00:47:05
			provocative, right? Liberal, but
he's made Toba to Allah He as a
		
00:47:05 --> 00:47:09
			chef now and he's he's an extra
Bundy in Indonesia and Malaysia.
		
00:47:09 --> 00:47:12
			So that's good for him. The other
is they disappear? They always
		
00:47:12 --> 00:47:14
			disappear in Islam. But let's say
hypothetically, they do, don't
		
00:47:14 --> 00:47:16
			they? It's really odd. Yeah, that
was disappear.
		
00:47:18 --> 00:47:21
			Imagine those people set up a
state
		
00:47:22 --> 00:47:25
			and it called it, you know,
dawdle, Islam?
		
00:47:26 --> 00:47:30
			And not like we need one right,
but just hypothetically, not. I'm
		
00:47:30 --> 00:47:33
			saying that most there are tons of
Muslim countries already. But
		
00:47:33 --> 00:47:37
			hypothetically, they set up this
is going to be a land where our
		
00:47:37 --> 00:47:40
			chief goal is Islam, which of
course is wonderful idea. Right?
		
00:47:41 --> 00:47:43
			When I say I don't need one. I
mean, like, we have so many
		
00:47:43 --> 00:47:46
			countries not that such a country
wouldn't be a great idea. But
		
00:47:46 --> 00:47:52
			imagine this type of idealistic
Muslim nation was but it was run
		
00:47:52 --> 00:47:58
			by reforms, reformed Muslims,
okay, these liberal types, your
		
00:47:58 --> 00:48:01
			average Muslim and your average
Imam and shit, they dismiss it
		
00:48:01 --> 00:48:06
			outright, right. And this is
exactly what's happening. With a
		
00:48:06 --> 00:48:13
			lot of rabbis, in the earlier
times, probably fewer now. But the
		
00:48:13 --> 00:48:18
			bulk of rabbis, the Satmar types,
the matura carta types, which are
		
00:48:18 --> 00:48:22
			they're a little bit more extreme
even. And people disagree with
		
00:48:22 --> 00:48:27
			their activism, rabbis, Jews
themselves, but even anti Zionist
		
00:48:27 --> 00:48:31
			Jews disagree with their activism.
But nonetheless, that used to be
		
00:48:31 --> 00:48:35
			the main mainstream position is
that this whole thing is sinful,
		
00:48:36 --> 00:48:39
			as against the Torah. Yeah, that's
true. Yeah. So I recommend you
		
00:48:39 --> 00:48:43
			check out check out Yakov Shapiro.
Thank you, you're gonna love his
		
00:48:43 --> 00:48:46
			work. Right. You're gonna love his
lectures, you know, who had him on
		
00:48:46 --> 00:48:49
			is the deen show, Eddie from the
deen show. All right. Yeah, he had
		
00:48:49 --> 00:48:52
			him on. You had him on. All right.
Now, I want to ask you about some
		
00:48:52 --> 00:48:55
			converts that you had. And you
interviewed Muhammad killer.
		
00:48:57 --> 00:49:02
			Muhammad killer is tell us about
him a bit. Age of crisis. Yep. Let
		
00:49:02 --> 00:49:06
			me just turn around here. I'm
looking for the book. There we go.
		
00:49:06 --> 00:49:07
			USA somewhere.
		
00:49:08 --> 00:49:13
			We thinking Islam and the West, a
new, a new narrative for the age
		
00:49:13 --> 00:49:16
			of crises. Not not a very,
		
00:49:17 --> 00:49:20
			you know, doesn't draw me in that
title. But when I actually read
		
00:49:20 --> 00:49:24
			the book, I really appreciated the
fantastic book. And I had the
		
00:49:24 --> 00:49:27
			privilege of interviewing him at
Cambridge University on that you
		
00:49:27 --> 00:49:28
			can see on the channel,
		
00:49:29 --> 00:49:32
			and a very important work and you
recommend it without going into
		
00:49:32 --> 00:49:37
			all the details, but he, he knows
his stuff. And he does offer a
		
00:49:37 --> 00:49:43
			profound paradigm than design
paradigm for, you know, a vision
		
00:49:43 --> 00:49:47
			to pursue if you like, and what
was his claim to fame? Was he a
		
00:49:47 --> 00:49:51
			diplomat or No, no, that was
great. And he was a diplomat. He
		
00:49:51 --> 00:49:56
			was a visiting fellow at Cambridge
University. So I was a professor,
		
00:49:56 --> 00:49:58
			okay. No, fellow.
		
00:49:59 --> 00:49:59
			pedantic Nope.
		
00:50:00 --> 00:50:07
			and close. Yeah. All right. So we
do you do you have an episode that
		
00:50:07 --> 00:50:10
			sticks out in your mind the most
from one of your interviews? No,
		
00:50:10 --> 00:50:13
			you said there's so many jewels if
I say so it's not because of me,
		
00:50:13 --> 00:50:17
			because of the guests. It's
difficult to have one that sticks
		
00:50:17 --> 00:50:20
			out the most. But there are there
are some, I think, rightly,
		
00:50:21 --> 00:50:24
			very significant, one or two
videos, actually which raise
		
00:50:24 --> 00:50:30
			eyebrows. And one of them it
features a guy called Keith Ward,
		
00:50:31 --> 00:50:36
			who's a Church of England priest,
also happens to be a professor of
		
00:50:37 --> 00:50:40
			Christians Theology at Oxford
University, and it was a
		
00:50:40 --> 00:50:43
			philosopher. He's also probably
Britain's most senior Christian
		
00:50:43 --> 00:50:47
			theologian, very famous, hugely
accomplished, written more books,
		
00:50:47 --> 00:50:51
			and I've had hot dinners. A great
guy, and I've had him on several
		
00:50:51 --> 00:50:54
			times, bless him has been a great
privilege to talk to him. Anyway,
		
00:50:54 --> 00:50:57
			when I first I've been reading his
stuff ever since I was a
		
00:50:57 --> 00:51:00
			Christian. Actually, I was
familiar with his work. And that's
		
00:51:00 --> 00:51:03
			why I invited him on, because I
wanted to talk to him about and
		
00:51:03 --> 00:51:06
			lots of questions. So I invited
him on He graciously came on. Now
		
00:51:06 --> 00:51:10
			I already knew because of the
kind, I knew from his books that
		
00:51:10 --> 00:51:14
			he actually did believe that
Mohammed upon MVPs was a prophet.
		
00:51:14 --> 00:51:20
			I knew that he was a bit
pluralist. So Nevertheless, I he's
		
00:51:20 --> 00:51:23
			such a great guy, and I he's an
idealist in philosophy, philosophy
		
00:51:23 --> 00:51:27
			is an idealist. So that's a
technical term in philosophy, you
		
00:51:27 --> 00:51:29
			know, following Bishop Berkeley
and others, and I really wanted to
		
00:51:29 --> 00:51:33
			talk to him. Anyway, he came on,
and I asked him the question, do
		
00:51:33 --> 00:51:37
			you think Muhammad, the prophet of
God, he said, Yes. And, and then I
		
00:51:37 --> 00:51:43
			had the thought, I'm not sure. Why
do your colleagues by which I met,
		
00:51:43 --> 00:51:45
			of course, his Christian
philosopher, colleagues, and
		
00:51:45 --> 00:51:48
			Christian theologian, colleagues,
what do they think? And I thought,
		
00:51:48 --> 00:51:50
			the interesting to know how many
of those might be sympathetic or
		
00:51:50 --> 00:51:54
			not to Islam? He said, Oh, no,
that they all are virtually all of
		
00:51:54 --> 00:51:57
			them think he's a prophet? Wow. I
thought, what.
		
00:51:59 --> 00:52:03
			And I just suppress my reaction,
because it was such a startling
		
00:52:03 --> 00:52:04
			thing for him to say,
		
00:52:05 --> 00:52:09
			and such a significant thing to
say, because what it meant is that
		
00:52:09 --> 00:52:13
			if I can put it this way that the
Christian Allama in the West have
		
00:52:13 --> 00:52:18
			conceded the point Subhan Allah,
Islam is from God, that Muhammad
		
00:52:18 --> 00:52:20
			was sent by God.
		
00:52:22 --> 00:52:26
			You know, we've had, what, 1400
years of civilizational conflict
		
00:52:26 --> 00:52:30
			or tension, where the West has
insisted, it's it's right. And so,
		
00:52:30 --> 00:52:33
			but they're their own
intelligence, you have now
		
00:52:33 --> 00:52:36
			accepted that Islam was right.
That's right, the power will be as
		
00:52:36 --> 00:52:40
			if the Saudi almost suddenly
decided that Jesus was crucified
		
00:52:41 --> 00:52:46
			for their sins. Exactly. Sir, that
would never happen. But so that
		
00:52:46 --> 00:52:50
			was extraordinary. And you can't
question what he says he is, you
		
00:52:50 --> 00:52:52
			know, he's actually a religious
professor, you get ordinary
		
00:52:52 --> 00:52:55
			professors. And then you get the
elite professors who are appointed
		
00:52:55 --> 00:52:59
			directly by the king or the queen,
in his case, who are called Regis
		
00:52:59 --> 00:53:04
			professors. So he is a very senior
academic. And so in other words,
		
00:53:04 --> 00:53:08
			he knows everyone in the field. So
he is able to make that up. And no
		
00:53:08 --> 00:53:11
			one's ever contradicts it. No
one's texted me or written to me
		
00:53:11 --> 00:53:15
			saying the boys and right. So the
question is the two questions. Why
		
00:53:15 --> 00:53:19
			do they say this? And secondly,
why isn't he a Muslim? Yeah, I
		
00:53:19 --> 00:53:23
			asked him this. But why do they
think this because these guys,
		
00:53:23 --> 00:53:26
			when you get to know them a bit to
their work, most of them are very
		
00:53:26 --> 00:53:30
			honest. I mean, they are real
scholars, you don't get to be an
		
00:53:30 --> 00:53:32
			Oxford professor, unless you have
something going for you.
		
00:53:33 --> 00:53:36
			They looked at the other other
religions, often that Islam or
		
00:53:36 --> 00:53:40
			Hinduism or Judaism, and you know,
they've read the texts and
		
00:53:40 --> 00:53:43
			responsibles. And they have seen
the likeness they've they know
		
00:53:43 --> 00:53:47
			about Moses, they also know about
Mohammed, and they can see how
		
00:53:47 --> 00:53:52
			similar they are. And they are of
the same type. They both come from
		
00:53:52 --> 00:53:55
			the same place, arguably. So yeah,
they get it because they're
		
00:53:55 --> 00:53:59
			experts on it. So that's why I
think they will get is because
		
00:53:59 --> 00:54:02
			they've looked at the evidence.
Why they're not Muslims is a much
		
00:54:02 --> 00:54:06
			more complicated, dark question. I
don't have an I asked Professor
		
00:54:06 --> 00:54:10
			Keith. Well, why and he gave his
answer I didn't really understand
		
00:54:10 --> 00:54:12
			it has to do with, well, I've been
brought up in this tradition, and
		
00:54:12 --> 00:54:16
			it's fine. It's a way to God and I
recognize Islam as a way to God
		
00:54:16 --> 00:54:20
			didn't I mean, you know, hey,
that's his answer. But yeah,
		
00:54:20 --> 00:54:24
			that's usually the one way to go
about it. I'm having a discussion
		
00:54:24 --> 00:54:27
			with with the Christian gentleman
right now.
		
00:54:28 --> 00:54:30
			And I really basically said to
him, Look,
		
00:54:32 --> 00:54:36
			I'm a simple guy, hypothetical. I
just, I'm a born Muslim, and I
		
00:54:36 --> 00:54:38
			follow the Prophet peace be upon
him.
		
00:54:40 --> 00:54:43
			All I want to know is if I
continue in this for the rest of
		
00:54:43 --> 00:54:47
			my life, and I meet God, okay. Is
he going to be pleased with my
		
00:54:47 --> 00:54:50
			decision to follow the Prophet? Or
am I going to be in trouble? Am I
		
00:54:50 --> 00:54:53
			going to find myself in trouble
with God at the end of the day
		
00:54:54 --> 00:54:55
			with this decision?
		
00:54:56 --> 00:54:59
			And I'm asking him in his theology
like in your
		
00:55:00 --> 00:55:04
			Christian belief. Am I wrong about
this? Ultimately, at the end of
		
00:55:04 --> 00:55:07
			the day, he had to admit that
		
00:55:08 --> 00:55:11
			God doesn't punish you if you make
the wrong decision.
		
00:55:13 --> 00:55:17
			At that point, well, then what is
the purpose of being right then?
		
00:55:18 --> 00:55:23
			Right? Like, if the wrong if
making the wrong decision, if the
		
00:55:23 --> 00:55:28
			wrong answer doesn't get you,
right marked wrong, why do I
		
00:55:28 --> 00:55:31
			study? What's the point of
anything? What's the point of the
		
00:55:31 --> 00:55:34
			whole class? If marking the answer
is wrong on the exam?
		
00:55:36 --> 00:55:41
			So does he represent the
evangelical view correctly, that
		
00:55:42 --> 00:55:47
			there is no clear cut line that
God says if you follow any prophet
		
00:55:47 --> 00:55:50
			after Jesus, you will be in
trouble with me on the day of
		
00:55:50 --> 00:55:52
			judgment he gave a joke would
never agree with that. They would
		
00:55:52 --> 00:55:56
			always say if you Yeah, they would
say that Jesus was the final last
		
00:55:56 --> 00:56:00
			prophet. Even though he said in
Matthew's Gospel, Matthew 15, have
		
00:56:00 --> 00:56:03
			already been sent to the lost
sheep of the house of Israel. And
		
00:56:03 --> 00:56:06
			according to Matthew called a
Gentile woman, a dog, a Canaanite
		
00:56:06 --> 00:56:09
			woman. So imagine 15, if you are
not familiar with it, I'm not
		
00:56:09 --> 00:56:11
			saying this historical, by the
way, a lot in the gospels we now
		
00:56:11 --> 00:56:13
			know is not historical. But
nevertheless, you know, he is
		
00:56:13 --> 00:56:17
			presented as someone who's only
sent to the Jews in that regard, I
		
00:56:17 --> 00:56:20
			think is historical, why it makes
sense of historical context. And
		
00:56:20 --> 00:56:23
			the crown confirms that. But
certainly for evangelicals, if you
		
00:56:23 --> 00:56:26
			follow Muhammad, you began to
hellfire. Absolutely.
		
00:56:27 --> 00:56:32
			These days, I really want to
engage with others, right? I see
		
00:56:32 --> 00:56:37
			that this war has actually caused
so many people to be talking about
		
00:56:38 --> 00:56:40
			things that we're interested in,
they're talking about Judaism,
		
00:56:40 --> 00:56:43
			they're talking about Christianity
to talk about Islam, Christianity,
		
00:56:43 --> 00:56:47
			in the sense of Christian Zionism,
the Christians are very amped up
		
00:56:47 --> 00:56:48
			about Israel,
		
00:56:49 --> 00:56:53
			Islam and Muslims are is
constantly in the forefront. So
		
00:56:53 --> 00:56:56
			I'm taking this an opportunity to
talk and I talked to a lot of
		
00:56:57 --> 00:57:00
			a lot of Christians and a lot of
right wingers, usually deep in
		
00:57:00 --> 00:57:05
			their threads on Twitter. What's
your advice on how to interact
		
00:57:05 --> 00:57:09
			with those types of Christians?
Mainly evangelicals, mainly very
		
00:57:09 --> 00:57:13
			worried about immigration and
things like that? What's your
		
00:57:13 --> 00:57:17
			advice on how to interact with
them? My advice would not be to
		
00:57:17 --> 00:57:21
			interact with them on Twitter.
It's, it's not really the right
		
00:57:21 --> 00:57:22
			the right forum for
		
00:57:24 --> 00:57:28
			decent interaction, you know,
human, compassionate, intelligent,
		
00:57:29 --> 00:57:31
			because so much communication
between individuals or human
		
00:57:31 --> 00:57:37
			beings is nonverbal. And Twitter
is a highly kind of selective, a
		
00:57:37 --> 00:57:41
			slice of reality that is easily
amenable to you know, so there's a
		
00:57:41 --> 00:57:46
			terrible medium for that. Yeah.
But I think the key thing is to
		
00:57:46 --> 00:57:51
			show I know it might sound very
basic, but many, many people are I
		
00:57:51 --> 00:57:55
			had certainly in the past
forgotten basic principles, which
		
00:57:55 --> 00:57:59
			I should have remembered and try
and remember now. Yeah. And when
		
00:57:59 --> 00:58:01
			talking to evangelicals, I used to
do some very, very silly what I'm
		
00:58:01 --> 00:58:04
			about to say, but I really believe
in this. The first thing is be
		
00:58:04 --> 00:58:09
			polite. Actually, I've seen some
Muslims, not many, thank goodness,
		
00:58:09 --> 00:58:12
			but some of them just go in there
and attack people Christians.
		
00:58:12 --> 00:58:15
			Know, be polite, say, Hello,
introduce, give you give them your
		
00:58:15 --> 00:58:18
			name. I know this sounds very
basic, but it's surprising how
		
00:58:18 --> 00:58:23
			often I forgot to do that. So be
polite, and at least try and
		
00:58:23 --> 00:58:25
			listen to what they're saying.
Even though you may be repellent
		
00:58:25 --> 00:58:29
			or completely wrong. And so you
know, maintain the eye contact,
		
00:58:29 --> 00:58:32
			try and show them some respect,
because they're human beings after
		
00:58:32 --> 00:58:36
			all, and because often what wins
people over is not me. I mean,
		
00:58:36 --> 00:58:38
			this is gonna sound extremely
arrogant, is arrogant. I'm gonna
		
00:58:38 --> 00:58:42
			say anyway, my regret saying this
is easy for me to win an argument
		
00:58:42 --> 00:58:45
			with a Christian, usually, it's
not difficult, you know, I know
		
00:58:45 --> 00:58:49
			the Bible better than they do.
Just a fact. I just noticed that
		
00:58:49 --> 00:58:52
			the average Christian, not
professor from Oxford, but I can
		
00:58:52 --> 00:58:56
			win an argument and lose the
person just as easily. You know,
		
00:58:56 --> 00:58:59
			winning the person over is
absolutely a different thing
		
00:58:59 --> 00:59:02
			entirely. So winning the
intellectual argument is nothing
		
00:59:02 --> 00:59:06
			doesn't matter. really doesn't
matter. Doesn't matter what proofs
		
00:59:06 --> 00:59:09
			I come up with arguments, what
Biblical verses what facts is
		
00:59:09 --> 00:59:13
			irrelevant. If I attack that
person, they get defensive, and
		
00:59:13 --> 00:59:16
			then they retort with some
ridiculous statement. And we
		
00:59:16 --> 00:59:19
			become alienated over. So I've
done that. I've been there and I
		
00:59:19 --> 00:59:23
			behave like that a number of
times. I try and avoid that
		
00:59:23 --> 00:59:28
			because it's bad. Oh, the other
thing was, you know, as well as
		
00:59:28 --> 00:59:32
			better than I is that our job is
not to convert anyone. It's God
		
00:59:32 --> 00:59:37
			who changes hearts. And so we must
move away from the responsibility
		
00:59:37 --> 00:59:40
			the sense of responsibility that I
must convert this person. Yeah.
		
00:59:41 --> 00:59:44
			You know, that's not our job. It's
not even job was may think it's
		
00:59:44 --> 00:59:47
			their job for them, but it's not
our job. Our job is to retain
		
00:59:48 --> 00:59:53
			knowledge, facts, and then leave
the rest of God and gobble.
		
00:59:53 --> 00:59:58
			Convert them if you want. Yep.
Let's take three questions.
		
00:59:58 --> 00:59:59
			Audience This is your chance.
		
01:00:00 --> 01:00:06
			to talk to the interviewer
himself, Paul Williams from blank
		
01:00:06 --> 01:00:11
			theology. You know, his videos are
usually recorded, pre recorded and
		
01:00:11 --> 01:00:13
			they're put out there so there's
no back and forth.
		
01:00:14 --> 01:00:20
			I'm going to take two or three
good and brief questions. Somewhat
		
01:00:20 --> 01:00:23
			related to what we've been talking
about. From the audience. We have
		
01:00:23 --> 01:00:28
			about 400 to 500 people watching
here, because we have here we're
		
01:00:28 --> 01:00:31
			on Instagram and we're on
Facebook. So bring your questions
		
01:00:31 --> 01:00:34
			if you're on Instagram, bring it
you can put it on Instagram. If
		
01:00:34 --> 01:00:38
			you're on Facebook put on YouTube
or Instagram. They're not checking
		
01:00:38 --> 01:00:41
			the Facebook right now. Facebook
is nothing other than now a
		
01:00:41 --> 01:00:45
			glorified Craigslist if you ask
me. The Facebook marketplace is
		
01:00:45 --> 01:00:47
			the only thing going for it. She
asked me
		
01:00:48 --> 01:00:48
			here.
		
01:00:50 --> 01:00:53
			And oh, sorry, I just insulted we
got a Facebook engineer sitting
		
01:00:53 --> 01:00:55
			right here. You need to go in
there with dynamite the whole
		
01:00:55 --> 01:00:57
			thing and start over.
		
01:00:59 --> 01:01:00
			Okay,
		
01:01:01 --> 01:01:06
			are you are you on Facebook at
all? Yeah, I have a Facebook group
		
01:01:06 --> 01:01:08
			called blogging theology. Not
surprisingly, I have a private
		
01:01:08 --> 01:01:11
			amount my own Facebook for me, but
they may my blog and theology is
		
01:01:11 --> 01:01:13
			on there. Yes, you find it useful.
		
01:01:14 --> 01:01:19
			It's not really for me, I have it
as a service to share my own
		
01:01:19 --> 01:01:22
			content, but it's closed, but you
can join it. In other words, it's
		
01:01:22 --> 01:01:25
			devoid trolls getting in and just
trashing the place. Makes sense.
		
01:01:25 --> 01:01:30
			Yeah. Yeah, I used to be a huge
Facebook fan. And I used to be on
		
01:01:30 --> 01:01:35
			it all the time. But over the
years, it just got so convoluted
		
01:01:35 --> 01:01:39
			and it just never adapted. And I
feel that Twitter is just
		
01:01:39 --> 01:01:42
			completely left it in the dust and
everyone's on Twitter. Right
		
01:01:42 --> 01:01:42
			Great.
		
01:01:43 --> 01:01:46
			All right. Here's a question for
you
		
01:01:52 --> 01:01:53
			What's my favorite color
		
01:01:57 --> 01:01:59
			here's a question for you. Do you
think Muslims should boycott piers
		
01:01:59 --> 01:02:00
			Morgan's show
		
01:02:02 --> 01:02:04
			going on the show I guess he means
going on the show and Muslims not
		
01:02:04 --> 01:02:07
			go on the show. I'm gonna say some
it's gonna be slightly
		
01:02:08 --> 01:02:12
			embarrassing and awkward. Really?
Because I do have a view on this
		
01:02:12 --> 01:02:15
			and several people have been on
actually friends of mine. And I
		
01:02:15 --> 01:02:19
			don't mean to criticize what their
decision however I do think
		
01:02:19 --> 01:02:20
			absolutely. We've
		
01:02:21 --> 01:02:26
			we've had some big guns going on
that program. Whether it be
		
01:02:26 --> 01:02:29
			Mohammed hijab and Abdullah
Andalusi another friend of mine
		
01:02:29 --> 01:02:32
			was on the last night. My personal
view is we don't need any more
		
01:02:32 --> 01:02:36
			Muslims go on. Piers Morgan is a
bigot isn't islamophobe he doesn't
		
01:02:36 --> 01:02:42
			learn I don't mind people being
bigots. If if when the arrows are
		
01:02:42 --> 01:02:45
			pointed out they go Do you know
you have a point I'll change my
		
01:02:45 --> 01:02:49
			mind but he doesn't he's a bigger
you know you know he's just a
		
01:02:49 --> 01:02:53
			bigger so we should we shouldn't
waste our time being his is kind
		
01:02:53 --> 01:02:58
			of I don't know setups for him to
exercise his his vile evil views I
		
01:02:58 --> 01:03:01
			mean, he's you know, the way he
treats Muslims compared to the way
		
01:03:01 --> 01:03:04
			he treats the Israeli ambassador,
for example, or Israeli spokesman
		
01:03:04 --> 01:03:08
			at falling boycotting, but I'm
gonna say that he has been on so
		
01:03:08 --> 01:03:10
			far shouldn't have been on but I
think we should certainly not go
		
01:03:10 --> 01:03:13
			on ever again. Yeah, we wouldn't.
We wouldn't have known the level
		
01:03:13 --> 01:03:18
			of or his real attitude towards
things if they hadn't gone on. And
		
01:03:19 --> 01:03:24
			what it seems to be it's like his,
his material on the show. Besides
		
01:03:24 --> 01:03:27
			that, he gets, you know, a unique
set of viewers every time he has a
		
01:03:27 --> 01:03:33
			new guest. But it seems to be like
the fodder for a slugfest on
		
01:03:33 --> 01:03:37
			Twitter afterwards, every single
guest of his and him ended up
		
01:03:37 --> 01:03:40
			yelling at each other on Twitter.
Exactly. It's very, very
		
01:03:40 --> 01:03:44
			unwholesome. And I remember
recently another friend of mine.
		
01:03:45 --> 01:03:46
			Dr.
		
01:03:48 --> 01:03:50
			Your name is Dr. Abdul Wahid.
		
01:03:52 --> 01:03:57
			Who was stating the fact that you
know, given how bad
		
01:03:58 --> 01:04:01
			Piers Morgan thinks Islam is why
so many women why most converts to
		
01:04:01 --> 01:04:05
			Islam women. And I think it's
Morgan. I heard him say, you know,
		
01:04:05 --> 01:04:09
			oh, they that they obviously like
pressing themselves. Yeah. Now,
		
01:04:09 --> 01:04:14
			this is just sheer stupidity and
bigotry and the fact that he is
		
01:04:14 --> 01:04:16
			indeed, I've seen on Twitter
afterwards. He's been roundly
		
01:04:16 --> 01:04:21
			criticized, rightly by numerous
people, but he's still defending
		
01:04:21 --> 01:04:25
			what he said. And that shows me
he's a bigot that I can't have any
		
01:04:25 --> 01:04:28
			respect for as opposed to a bigot
who actually listens and then
		
01:04:28 --> 01:04:32
			changes his mind. We all make
mistakes, but this guy just in
		
01:04:32 --> 01:04:37
			trenches is ignorance and that's
just Isha be kicked off TV and
		
01:04:37 --> 01:04:40
			mitre and I think he's also
basically a wing of corporate
		
01:04:40 --> 01:04:45
			media. He's between corporate and
and the new media or free media
		
01:04:45 --> 01:04:51
			but because when he has an Israeli
ambassador or Ben Shapiro, it's
		
01:04:51 --> 01:04:55
			like with with mittens, he treats
them right. And there's never some
		
01:04:55 --> 01:04:57
			kind of there's never a
controversy and there's never a
		
01:04:57 --> 01:04:59
			fight on Twitter afterwards. So
you
		
01:05:00 --> 01:05:02
			You're in. Yeah. Okay.
		
01:05:03 --> 01:05:08
			So that was a good question. Yep.
Here's another question about your
		
01:05:08 --> 01:05:13
			knowledge of Christian theology.
Christians believe that Christ
		
01:05:13 --> 01:05:18
			Himself is the temple. Okay. Is it
blasphemous for Christians to
		
01:05:18 --> 01:05:21
			believe in the Third Temple?
		
01:05:22 --> 01:05:26
			The rebuilding of another temple?
Well, I'm not a Christian. So I
		
01:05:26 --> 01:05:28
			can't pronounce on what's
blasphemous for Christians
		
01:05:28 --> 01:05:32
			believe, you know, that's a
Christian issue. I think believing
		
01:05:32 --> 01:05:35
			in Jesus as Son of God, or God is
blasphemous, but you know, I mean,
		
01:05:35 --> 01:05:40
			but it's not my job to pronounce
that to people. When you're doing
		
01:05:40 --> 01:05:42
			Dower, I mean, your view as a
blasphemer is
		
01:05:43 --> 01:05:47
			quite heavy to the idea of the
Third Temple. It is not, it is not
		
01:05:47 --> 01:05:51
			normal Christian theology, but it
is very popular in recent years
		
01:05:51 --> 01:05:55
			amongst so called Christian
Zionists, most of them are in your
		
01:05:55 --> 01:05:59
			country, should America
reasonable. So the vast majority
		
01:05:59 --> 01:06:03
			of designers are actually
Gentiles. They're not Jews, the
		
01:06:03 --> 01:06:08
			Christians. And Alia Thai has
spoken incredibly eloquently about
		
01:06:08 --> 01:06:12
			this whole phenomenon of Christian
Zionism, on on my channel, and
		
01:06:12 --> 01:06:16
			certainly elsewhere as well, of
course. And it is a very strange
		
01:06:16 --> 01:06:19
			belief looking that, that somehow
God will bring back the Third
		
01:06:19 --> 01:06:21
			Temple when he's already
abolished.
		
01:06:22 --> 01:06:26
			The second temple in AD 70,
according to the letter of the
		
01:06:26 --> 01:06:29
			Hebrews, which is a letter in the
New Testament, was all about this
		
01:06:29 --> 01:06:32
			kind of thing about the how the
Christian dispensation has
		
01:06:32 --> 01:06:36
			fulfilled or overtaken or replaced
the Jewish dispensation. You can
		
01:06:36 --> 01:06:40
			bring back the Jewish
dispensation. eschatological
		
01:06:41 --> 01:06:45
			setting is, is really unbiblical.
It has no use in Christian
		
01:06:45 --> 01:06:49
			theology is really weird,
actually. But it's gained this new
		
01:06:49 --> 01:06:52
			cut of this currency because of
interesting reason. It's just like
		
01:06:52 --> 01:06:57
			Jewish support. Design ism is a
new thing. support zone is a new
		
01:06:57 --> 01:07:01
			thing. And I think what's really
going on this is my opinion, I
		
01:07:01 --> 01:07:06
			could be wrong. What's really
going on behind this? Is Israel's
		
01:07:06 --> 01:07:11
			itself anti Muslim, pro Western
position. And so many Christians
		
01:07:12 --> 01:07:15
			like Israel, because it's very
anti Muslim, anti Islamic
		
01:07:15 --> 01:07:19
			explicitly. I mean, I saw that I
saw on Sky News earlier this
		
01:07:19 --> 01:07:23
			evening, the Israeli ambassador to
the United Kingdom State in an
		
01:07:23 --> 01:07:29
			interview on Sky News, that she's
apps, there's absolutely no hope
		
01:07:29 --> 01:07:32
			of, of a two state solution. No
hope. Okay.
		
01:07:33 --> 01:07:38
			And she referenced in passing
about the Palestinians, as in
		
01:07:38 --> 01:07:41
			general, how radical they was, why
should you be can't be a two state
		
01:07:41 --> 01:07:44
			solution? Because they're radical.
This is all of the Palestinians.
		
01:07:44 --> 01:07:48
			Yeah, yeah. Right. So this idea of
the radical palette, this all
		
01:07:48 --> 01:07:52
			feeds in beautifully with a big
narrative you find in the West, in
		
01:07:52 --> 01:07:55
			the United States, obviously, and
in Europe, to some extent, as
		
01:07:55 --> 01:07:59
			well. So I can see why Christian,
fundamentalist Christians would
		
01:07:59 --> 01:08:02
			support Zionism because it
ultimately is anti Islamic, and it
		
01:08:02 --> 01:08:06
			fits in with the agenda. in
Palestine and Israel, the
		
01:08:06 --> 01:08:09
			population is 5050.
		
01:08:11 --> 01:08:16
			Countries like Denmark, France,
England, they're also complaining
		
01:08:16 --> 01:08:19
			of the rising population of
Muslims. So they seem to each
		
01:08:19 --> 01:08:25
			other have similar grievances. And
that's why they're really echoing
		
01:08:25 --> 01:08:28
			the same emotions and the same
sentiments. I see these circles.
		
01:08:28 --> 01:08:31
			They're constantly like a Venn
diagram. They're overlapping
		
01:08:31 --> 01:08:36
			heavily in that regard. Yeah. All
right. Here's the next question.
		
01:08:36 --> 01:08:39
			This is from a gentleman by the
name of Mark ward. He says a Salam
		
01:08:39 --> 01:08:44
			aleikum wa rahmatullah wa
barakato. What was the most
		
01:08:44 --> 01:08:48
			difficult interview for you? And I
did see someone else comment and
		
01:08:48 --> 01:08:52
			asked something about your
interview with William Lane.
		
01:08:52 --> 01:08:53
			Craig,
		
01:08:54 --> 01:08:58
			could you comment on your most
inner difficult interview? Well,
		
01:08:58 --> 01:08:59
			this is different. I mean, I've
gotta be careful here, because
		
01:08:59 --> 01:09:02
			some of these, these have been my
guests. And they might be guests.
		
01:09:02 --> 01:09:05
			Again, I don't want to criticize
them publicly, because it's not
		
01:09:05 --> 01:09:09
			appropriate. I do so but I won't
comment on one because
		
01:09:11 --> 01:09:14
			I will because I don't really mind
if he gets offended because he
		
01:09:14 --> 01:09:19
			behaved badly. Professor Herman,
who is a biblical scholar is one
		
01:09:19 --> 01:09:22
			of the great biblical scholars
today, in my view, one of your
		
01:09:22 --> 01:09:28
			many people. I invited him on and
we did two interviews. One was on
		
01:09:28 --> 01:09:31
			New Testament scholarship and so
on. We had a great time. Fantastic
		
01:09:31 --> 01:09:34
			interview, loved it, fanned out,
we're we're on the same wavelength
		
01:09:34 --> 01:09:37
			here and I and we were just
playing off it was a fantastic
		
01:09:37 --> 01:09:40
			interview. He enjoyed it. He wrote
an article about it on his website
		
01:09:40 --> 01:09:46
			really enjoyed it. Fantastic. He
also separately did, and something
		
01:09:46 --> 01:09:47
			I'd set up,
		
01:09:48 --> 01:09:56
			had to debate discussion with a
chap called Dr. Brown in is a
		
01:09:56 --> 01:10:00
			Muslim living in Saudi Arabia.
He's an eye surgeon
		
01:10:00 --> 01:10:00
			Listen, I got it.
		
01:10:01 --> 01:10:05
			And the debate was on was set up
to be a discussion between a
		
01:10:05 --> 01:10:09
			Muslim and an atheist support and
representing atheism. And Bart
		
01:10:09 --> 01:10:14
			Ehrman behaved badly. I mean, he
just did. I mean, it was so bad
		
01:10:14 --> 01:10:17
			that, you know, there's no one can
dispute. And he actually
		
01:10:17 --> 01:10:22
			apologized afterwards and not on
camera, but to me, but he behaved
		
01:10:22 --> 01:10:25
			badly. And it was, it was
embarrassing, because I didn't
		
01:10:25 --> 01:10:28
			know what to do. I mean, we have
two eminent people, I'm not there
		
01:10:28 --> 01:10:30
			like a school teacher in terms of
behavior.
		
01:10:31 --> 01:10:36
			That he would, but he was being
very aggressive. He kept, he made
		
01:10:36 --> 01:10:41
			mocking comments to Dr. Brown,
they dismissive and didn't take
		
01:10:41 --> 01:10:45
			seriously the I thought, the
discussion. And that was very,
		
01:10:45 --> 01:10:48
			very unfortunate, actually. And
that was the worst one. I don't I
		
01:10:48 --> 01:10:51
			mean, it Berman's watching this,
he probably isn't, of course. But
		
01:10:51 --> 01:10:55
			you know, I, it's just the way I
saw it. And I think he did, he did
		
01:10:55 --> 01:10:59
			acknowledge that he behaved badly.
So you were the moderator of that
		
01:10:59 --> 01:11:02
			debate? Well, moderation is too
strong a word I was hosting it
		
01:11:02 --> 01:11:08
			really, I was trying to steer too
bright guys in a hopefully I read
		
01:11:08 --> 01:11:11
			discussion towards, you know,
elucidating what the issues were,
		
01:11:11 --> 01:11:14
			and hopefully showing that, you
know, Islam was a serious
		
01:11:14 --> 01:11:17
			tradition. And the personalities
were very different. And I think
		
01:11:17 --> 01:11:19
			it was a mistake to put them
together anyway.
		
01:11:20 --> 01:11:25
			I mean, Dr. Brown's style is much
more gentle than that. And I think
		
01:11:25 --> 01:11:26
			he was steamrollered,
		
01:11:28 --> 01:11:34
			very aggressive American professor
who really has such contempt for
		
01:11:34 --> 01:11:38
			religion that he couldn't
seriously. And I've seen by
		
01:11:38 --> 01:11:41
			ermine, as an academic, you say,
who was very respectful, were
		
01:11:41 --> 01:11:42
			normally very respectful
		
01:11:43 --> 01:11:47
			and expected that approach to
continue and it didn't. Do you
		
01:11:47 --> 01:11:50
			enjoy moderating these kinds of
debates? Is that something you
		
01:11:50 --> 01:11:54
			look forward to doing in the
future? Oh, absolutely. I was
		
01:11:54 --> 01:11:57
			hugely privileged to be invited to
moderate debate as a tuna College
		
01:11:57 --> 01:12:03
			in Berkeley, California in
February, where a very wonderful
		
01:12:03 --> 01:12:08
			professor of Islamic law from
Toronto University was 100
		
01:12:08 --> 01:12:12
			federal, and our own Sheikh Hassan
spiker.
		
01:12:13 --> 01:12:18
			And I was invited and did did host
a debate, although I was told
		
01:12:18 --> 01:12:20
			wasn't quite a debate. It's more
of a discussion. But really, it
		
01:12:20 --> 01:12:24
			was a debate between these two
gentlemen. And that was very, very
		
01:12:24 --> 01:12:27
			interesting in front of a big
audience. It's a tuner and it was
		
01:12:27 --> 01:12:30
			fantastic. I really enjoyed that.
Because I get you know, at least I
		
01:12:30 --> 01:12:33
			get some opportunity to ask the
kinds of questions I want to ask
		
01:12:33 --> 01:12:36
			even if I'm not, I it's not
entirely selfish, but I get some
		
01:12:36 --> 01:12:39
			small window where I can actually
ask what I wanted. It's very
		
01:12:39 --> 01:12:42
			indulgent. In that sense, what was
the statement of that debate?
		
01:12:44 --> 01:12:48
			The same was based on on a saying
called
		
01:12:50 --> 01:12:55
			slogan, do what thou wilt do what
their will is the creed of
		
01:12:55 --> 01:13:00
			Aleister Crowley who was an
English satanist no less
		
01:13:01 --> 01:13:04
			Aleister Crowley he actually be
actually a featured on a Beatles
		
01:13:04 --> 01:13:08
			cover, Kid you not that as well.
So do what they do. In other
		
01:13:08 --> 01:13:12
			words, you're not doing God's
will. I'm doing what I want to do
		
01:13:12 --> 01:13:16
			is the only creed I need follow
this. And the argument was
		
01:13:16 --> 01:13:20
			proposition was this is actually
the creed of our era of the
		
01:13:20 --> 01:13:25
			Zeitgeist. Yeah, what we believe
as a civilization you do your own
		
01:13:25 --> 01:13:31
			thing, without any reference to
any, any divine command or divine
		
01:13:31 --> 01:13:35
			frame of reference. So that was a
discussion and it was bought in
		
01:13:35 --> 01:13:37
			Liberal liberalism, nature of
liberalism, whether or not you
		
01:13:37 --> 01:13:41
			could Islamic, or Muslim could
leave and it was living in this
		
01:13:41 --> 01:13:47
			Muslim society. And so we talked
about, you know, roles and all of
		
01:13:47 --> 01:13:51
			that, but it was very topical,
actually, I thought, but in that
		
01:13:51 --> 01:13:55
			case, both of them would agree
that that statement would be evil.
		
01:13:57 --> 01:13:59
			Yes, but hasn't spiker
		
01:14:01 --> 01:14:06
			did not accept that liberalism.
Could actually is a viable project
		
01:14:07 --> 01:14:12
			project at all as problematic. Was
the professor from Toronto accept
		
01:14:12 --> 01:14:15
			the thought of liberalism, in a
modified form? The the Rawlsian
		
01:14:16 --> 01:14:19
			liberalism genre was the American
philosopher, was actually
		
01:14:19 --> 01:14:24
			compatible with Islam. Like I
said, liberalism is not compatible
		
01:14:24 --> 01:14:27
			with Islam. My own preference was
very, very much for Hasson Spiker,
		
01:14:27 --> 01:14:31
			I think, but then I'm not there.
That was, that wasn't the point
		
01:14:31 --> 01:14:34
			what my view was, you mentioned
Satanist. Do you know about Albert
		
01:14:34 --> 01:14:37
			Pike's three World War of vision?
		
01:14:38 --> 01:14:42
			No, I don't. Okay, you might be
interested in that. Check it out.
		
01:14:42 --> 01:14:46
			It's a short letter. That's
there's verification that was
		
01:14:46 --> 01:14:53
			written way back in the early or
late 19th century so late 1800s.
		
01:14:54 --> 01:14:58
			That he was a Satanist. And he had
a vision from Satan that there
		
01:14:58 --> 01:14:59
			will be three world wars
		
01:15:00 --> 01:15:03
			One would knock out Christianity
from Europe knock out the kings.
		
01:15:03 --> 01:15:08
			The second would set up a Jewish
state. And the third would be
		
01:15:08 --> 01:15:13
			between Jews and Muslims. And the
goal of the three world wars is
		
01:15:13 --> 01:15:17
			that it would take all this time
to knock out monotheism from the
		
01:15:17 --> 01:15:24
			earth and give atheism *
over the earth. And after atheism
		
01:15:24 --> 01:15:28
			settles as the dominant mode of
operation in the earth after that
		
01:15:28 --> 01:15:33
			the Luciferian doctrine or the or
Satanism itself can manifest and
		
01:15:33 --> 01:15:38
			invite people in from from the
void that they're in. That's idea.
		
01:15:38 --> 01:15:42
			I think you'd find it fascinating.
The Albert Pike. Yeah, Albert Pike
		
01:15:42 --> 01:15:45
			was it was a big set innocent from
in from America.
		
01:15:47 --> 01:15:50
			Okay, one more question from our
guests.
		
01:15:51 --> 01:15:53
			Who is a good question, actually.
		
01:15:54 --> 01:15:59
			This is from Lily Rose. Who would
you really like to interview that
		
01:15:59 --> 01:16:00
			you haven't yet had the chance?
		
01:16:02 --> 01:16:06
			Yes. Okay. I had to get a couple
of answers that what academically
		
01:16:07 --> 01:16:12
			Professor while Hallock of
Columbia University dates, who am
		
01:16:12 --> 01:16:13
			I big fan of?
		
01:16:14 --> 01:16:18
			I'm still longing to interview
him? I've not I've not exhausted
		
01:16:18 --> 01:16:23
			efforts to him, although I know
people who are Imam Tom tweeted
		
01:16:23 --> 01:16:25
			recently yesterday, I think it was
photographed with him and while
		
01:16:25 --> 01:16:29
			Halak you know, he's the author of
the impossible stage and numerous
		
01:16:29 --> 01:16:35
			other books on Islamic law and
epistemology is, is he's very,
		
01:16:35 --> 01:16:39
			very juicy academically and he's
actually a Christian as well. It's
		
01:16:39 --> 01:16:42
			amazing. You wouldn't have it, I
don't think you'd ever know that.
		
01:16:42 --> 01:16:44
			I'm not sure he would approve of
me saying this but much you never
		
01:16:44 --> 01:16:45
			know that reading his books
		
01:16:46 --> 01:16:49
			clearly has a profound
understanding and sympathy towards
		
01:16:49 --> 01:16:53
			Islam in the Sharia and so on. So
he will be my academic number one
		
01:16:53 --> 01:16:57
			because I just have such huge
respect for him.
		
01:16:58 --> 01:17:04
			But you know, other people use of
Islam I've I won't go into the
		
01:17:04 --> 01:17:08
			details about that, but I'd like
to, he does follow my work but I
		
01:17:08 --> 01:17:12
			like to have him on as well. I
think he's a because he's such a
		
01:17:12 --> 01:17:16
			lovely human being there's a good
embodiment, I think of of the
		
01:17:16 --> 01:17:19
			Sunnah of the Prophet upon every
piece in terms of his adab I mean,
		
01:17:19 --> 01:17:22
			and he's obviously a talented as
well as he's a very, very nice
		
01:17:22 --> 01:17:24
			person. I very much like to
		
01:17:25 --> 01:17:28
			just talked to him, not
necessarily about heavy theology,
		
01:17:28 --> 01:17:31
			but whatever so but it was a long
list of people I like to have one
		
01:17:31 --> 01:17:35
			but those two come to mind anyway.
Very good. How about this one?
		
01:17:35 --> 01:17:40
			This is interesting. You came into
Islam how have you navigated the
		
01:17:40 --> 01:17:45
			different contentious I should say
groups within medicine I'm not
		
01:17:45 --> 01:17:46
			gonna say sects, the groups
		
01:17:48 --> 01:17:52
			that hold one another erroneous
within the Sunnah.
		
01:17:53 --> 01:17:57
			Alison, how have you navigated
that? You know, sometimes that's a
		
01:17:57 --> 01:18:02
			problem for people. Yeah, it was
for me, I have I have journeyed
		
01:18:02 --> 01:18:05
			from different positions, I've now
reached a position which I'm
		
01:18:05 --> 01:18:09
			fairly comfortable with. I came
into Islam through the door of
		
01:18:09 --> 01:18:14
			Sufism. So through guidance work,
a lot of British Muslims become
		
01:18:14 --> 01:18:18
			Muslim through Salafism and I
didn't but through Sufism, and I
		
01:18:18 --> 01:18:21
			was quite happy there for some
time actually been quite anti
		
01:18:21 --> 01:18:25
			Salafi, I picked up that virus,
just because it seemed part of the
		
01:18:25 --> 01:18:26
			package.
		
01:18:27 --> 01:18:30
			And then because of an event
several years ago, a very
		
01:18:31 --> 01:18:34
			traumatic event really, I'm not
going to go into here but
		
01:18:35 --> 01:18:38
			a couple of Salafi friends of mine
		
01:18:39 --> 01:18:41
			basically saved my faith.
		
01:18:42 --> 01:18:44
			And as I look at the issues
because
		
01:18:45 --> 01:18:47
			there's not the right program for
this
		
01:18:48 --> 01:18:52
			and I gained and appreciate it
again, something you yourself
		
01:18:52 --> 01:18:56
			might perhaps approve of, or many
others but nevertheless as why at
		
01:18:56 --> 01:19:00
			where I'm at, I gained a positive
appreciation for many aspects of
		
01:19:00 --> 01:19:02
			salary, the salary outlook
		
01:19:04 --> 01:19:09
			and whether it be the Aqeedah
whether it be the handle you might
		
01:19:09 --> 01:19:11
			have as identify as a humbly
		
01:19:13 --> 01:19:16
			and so on as a methodology of the
salary
		
01:19:18 --> 01:19:22
			but particularly since the my work
on BT I found myself because I
		
01:19:22 --> 01:19:25
			can't I can't be although some
people would like me to be I can't
		
01:19:25 --> 01:19:30
			be professional on the channel. I
can't say well, you shouldn't be X
		
01:19:30 --> 01:19:33
			Mr. Muslim, you should follow this
school or that school I can't do
		
01:19:33 --> 01:19:36
			it is simply wrong. That's not
what I do.
		
01:19:37 --> 01:19:42
			So I've grown to have a very, I
find myself agreeing with many
		
01:19:42 --> 01:19:46
			positions and having a positive
appreciation of them. Many people
		
01:19:46 --> 01:19:48
			will think these positions are
irreconcilable. So actually, in
		
01:19:48 --> 01:19:51
			some ways, I'm quite pro Sufi. I
don't mean all the Sufi practices,
		
01:19:51 --> 01:19:55
			but the earlier ones I you know,
the self purification ones, I can
		
01:19:55 --> 01:19:57
			read guide and who's a Sufi and
still appreciate him.
		
01:19:59 --> 01:20:00
			I can also
		
01:20:00 --> 01:20:04
			Be very pro Salafi and appreciate
what some, you know, a lot of
		
01:20:04 --> 01:20:08
			Salafi works. So I find and when
it comes to the the rulers I can
		
01:20:08 --> 01:20:12
			be quite appreciate like his
Victoria, you know, which is, you
		
01:20:12 --> 01:20:14
			know, very much in favor of a
caliphate and I'm strong believer
		
01:20:14 --> 01:20:19
			in the caliphate actually now as
it really key issue for us today
		
01:20:19 --> 01:20:22
			and also understand those who
oppose this kind of so called you
		
01:20:22 --> 01:20:27
			know, well the whole issues so I
find myself actually affirming an
		
01:20:27 --> 01:20:30
			awful lot and denying very little
and I said to a friend of mine
		
01:20:30 --> 01:20:33
			recently you know, I'm just being
consistent aren't I? And they said
		
01:20:33 --> 01:20:36
			no no this is fine you can it's
the other people who think you
		
01:20:36 --> 01:20:40
			can't appreciate the positive
aspects of these things that
		
01:20:40 --> 01:20:43
			aren't there's not a good place to
be and so I I affirm a lot of
		
01:20:43 --> 01:20:46
			Sufism affirm a lot and Salafi
thought I agree with the Akita,
		
01:20:46 --> 01:20:51
			Salafi, etc etc. Even though
formally, these groups that self
		
01:20:51 --> 01:20:55
			identify, may be very hostile to
each other. So Sophie's may hate
		
01:20:55 --> 01:20:59
			selfies, selfies may sit, make
massively overgeneralize
		
01:20:59 --> 01:21:02
			statements about Sufism, and
dismiss it all. I don't agree with
		
01:21:02 --> 01:21:08
			that. So I'm actually quite
affirming of that I do. I do have
		
01:21:08 --> 01:21:12
			a line. By the way, I don't affirm
modernism, I don't tend to affirm
		
01:21:12 --> 01:21:18
			liberalism at all. So I guess I'm
strictly orthodox in my Outlook.
		
01:21:18 --> 01:21:23
			But within that, I have quite a
broad understanding of what I
		
01:21:23 --> 01:21:28
			think is positive. I think, in the
long term, having a very
		
01:21:30 --> 01:21:35
			nasty heart towards groups. In the
long term, it just hurts you. It's
		
01:21:35 --> 01:21:39
			one thing to have an opinion. But
it's another thing that let that
		
01:21:39 --> 01:21:42
			root so deeply in a person's
heart, that they have such a
		
01:21:42 --> 01:21:42
			hatred.
		
01:21:43 --> 01:21:47
			It's one thing to sort of dismiss
opinions that you disagree with.
		
01:21:47 --> 01:21:52
			But that's an opinion and it's not
a person in my shooted had dead
		
01:21:52 --> 01:21:56
			he, he had opinions. He was a
scholar, everyone knows his
		
01:21:56 --> 01:22:00
			opinions. But he also had a
teaching that he wanted all of his
		
01:22:00 --> 01:22:03
			moods, all of his disciples to
have a clean heart towards all
		
01:22:03 --> 01:22:07
			Muslims. And I think that in the
long term is extremely important
		
01:22:08 --> 01:22:11
			to keep someone's Amen. You see a
lot of people who came off, who
		
01:22:11 --> 01:22:16
			fell off is because they almost
were their hearts were at war with
		
01:22:16 --> 01:22:20
			other groups. And eventually, that
never leads to anything good.
		
01:22:22 --> 01:22:25
			So all right, let's see the
		
01:22:30 --> 01:22:33
			here's a question says, was Paul
involved with the Morbi tune group
		
01:22:33 --> 01:22:36
			in Norwich in the 80s? I don't
think so. Right.
		
01:22:38 --> 01:22:41
			Yeah, that group was told I
wasn't.
		
01:22:43 --> 01:22:46
			I know, I know. You mean, but no,
I was too young for that. Yeah.
		
01:22:46 --> 01:22:49
			All right. We thank you so much, I
don't want to keep you too long.
		
01:22:49 --> 01:22:53
			Because we've we've gotten now now
I know, you're used to actually
		
01:22:53 --> 01:22:57
			live streams that sometimes go two
and three and four hours, but we
		
01:22:57 --> 01:22:58
			want to be respectful of your
time.
		
01:23:00 --> 01:23:04
			Inshallah, tada, I would love to
do this again. And to talk again,
		
01:23:04 --> 01:23:09
			I'm going to keep sharing with you
some neat ideas that I think you'd
		
01:23:09 --> 01:23:13
			like and like to make videos out
of. We're in contact privately. So
		
01:23:13 --> 01:23:15
			please do share. If you have any
ideas like that, I really
		
01:23:15 --> 01:23:19
			appreciate these suggestions.
Thank you. I appreciate it. A love
		
01:23:19 --> 01:23:23
			talking to you love your work. And
let me tell you, the OMA loves
		
01:23:23 --> 01:23:27
			your work. So many people love
Paul Williams. And I think your
		
01:23:27 --> 01:23:33
			attitude of sort of neutrality
within orthodoxy. And Islam is
		
01:23:33 --> 01:23:36
			very helpful as an interviewer, if
you were to pick one, so I know
		
01:23:36 --> 01:23:38
			that you eliminate all the other
people you can interview them.
		
01:23:38 --> 01:23:39
			Right. So
		
01:23:41 --> 01:23:44
			again, I really believe that the
western world is benefiting so
		
01:23:44 --> 01:23:48
			much from your work and Allah has
chosen you in a very short period
		
01:23:48 --> 01:23:52
			of time to do a lot of good we ask
Allah subhanaw taala to let you
		
01:23:52 --> 01:23:56
			continue and give you the tofield
to continue this and even expand
		
01:23:57 --> 01:23:59
			blogging, theology, expand your
work on Twitter,
		
01:24:01 --> 01:24:03
			and everything else, just
colloquia. And thank you so much
		
01:24:03 --> 01:24:06
			for coming on. It's been an
absolute July, you've been a great
		
01:24:06 --> 01:24:08
			host, thank you very much for this
opportunity as well. Thank you.
		
01:24:08 --> 01:24:09
			Thank you barnacle effect, thank
you.
		
01:24:14 --> 01:24:18
			Okay, there you have it, brothers
and sisters, again, a lot of you
		
01:24:18 --> 01:24:22
			saying you love Paul Williams and
love his work, you could tell from
		
01:24:22 --> 01:24:26
			his intention, you can see you can
sense a pure intention when you
		
01:24:26 --> 01:24:30
			see one. And that to me, in my
view is a pure intention that is
		
01:24:30 --> 01:24:35
			reaping the rewards of having that
kind of clean heart towards the
		
01:24:35 --> 01:24:39
			OMA and just wanting to get to the
truth and that's really
		
01:24:41 --> 01:24:44
			the attitude we should all have.
So please make dua for him Allah
		
01:24:44 --> 01:24:47
			continue his work. I did tell
everybody that I'm going to read a
		
01:24:47 --> 01:24:51
			little bit from signs at the end
of time. Look at these voluminous
		
01:24:51 --> 01:24:56
			works. The scholars Allah bless
them have spilled so much ink,
		
01:24:56 --> 01:24:59
			right bringing us so much here.
		
01:25:02 --> 01:25:06
			You've been asking about the SOFIA
any other signs of the end of
		
01:25:06 --> 01:25:08
			time. And
		
01:25:11 --> 01:25:14
			it's going to be in the last
volume. So this is volume Pset
		
01:25:14 --> 01:25:18
			seven this is the last volume. So
this should have
		
01:25:21 --> 01:25:23
			should have looked it up before we
came but it didn't. So
		
01:25:28 --> 01:25:29
			don't tell this
		
01:25:31 --> 01:25:33
			wait a second. Is this the last
volume?
		
01:25:35 --> 01:25:36
			This can't be
		
01:25:37 --> 01:25:39
			where's that activism in here?
		
01:25:40 --> 01:25:43
			Maybe it's in a different order
than I expected.
		
01:25:44 --> 01:25:48
			I mean, you go to activism and be
down Hey, pick up the last book
		
01:25:48 --> 01:25:48
			right?
		
01:25:50 --> 01:25:54
			Logic says that right. Pick up the
last book. I don't see Africa as a
		
01:25:54 --> 01:26:00
			man I see in medical the photo
kill when it's a best in history.
		
01:26:01 --> 01:26:02
			Share a jeep.
		
01:26:03 --> 01:26:03
			Zane
		
01:26:05 --> 01:26:09
			look this through this for me for
Africanism and her looking here if
		
01:26:09 --> 01:26:12
			you see a Sophia Annie. If not,
let's say
		
01:26:14 --> 01:26:18
			let's open it up. Thank you all
model for the idea. We'll open it
		
01:26:18 --> 01:26:21
			up in a Shambhala okay
		
01:26:27 --> 01:26:29
			and let's take your q&a as well at
the same time
		
01:26:34 --> 01:26:39
			that was a good interview, wasn't
it? I really liked it. And I'm a
		
01:26:39 --> 01:26:41
			big fan. I'm telling you. I'm a
big fan of that type of
		
01:26:44 --> 01:26:45
			OMA wide attitude
		
01:26:51 --> 01:26:54
			Alright, let's take some q&a.
Whether we find it or not. We'll
		
01:26:54 --> 01:26:56
			have to do it another time
properly from that but keep
		
01:26:56 --> 01:26:58
			looking just right. It'd be J when
you hire
		
01:27:04 --> 01:27:09
			all right here is wrestler where's
that? Wrestler? Where was it?
		
01:27:10 --> 01:27:15
			I'm looking he asked about how he
can attend live here. Listen, what
		
01:27:15 --> 01:27:18
			is our schedule here? Our schedule
is Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday.
		
01:27:18 --> 01:27:23
			The studio is open, good people
can attend. We don't have any
		
01:27:23 --> 01:27:25
			rules on attendance until
something goes wrong, then we'll
		
01:27:25 --> 01:27:26
			make one
		
01:27:27 --> 01:27:29
			because that's what's going to
happen, right?
		
01:27:31 --> 01:27:35
			Yes, send a message to inside a
telegram. Say you're coming. We'll
		
01:27:35 --> 01:27:38
			reach out to you and we'll let you
in. We're on the third floor of
		
01:27:38 --> 01:27:41
			the soup kitchen. One mile down
from University Hospital Robert
		
01:27:41 --> 01:27:43
			Wood Johnson got
		
01:27:44 --> 01:27:47
			and we'd love for people to come
and sometimes he will come with
		
01:27:47 --> 01:27:50
			treats. For example today. There
is a nice beautiful Jersey pizza
		
01:27:50 --> 01:27:54
			sitting right there. Let's see
what it's like. And if we have to
		
01:27:54 --> 01:27:55
			put it in the oven Who's this
from?
		
01:27:57 --> 01:28:02
			Zhi Shan again, okay, very good
pizza needs to go be put in the
		
01:28:02 --> 01:28:04
			oven. Zayn, you know how to use an
oven.
		
01:28:05 --> 01:28:05
			Good.
		
01:28:07 --> 01:28:10
			All right, you know what the oven
is? Downstairs. Look it up. But I
		
01:28:10 --> 01:28:12
			don't know if you could put the
box in the oven.
		
01:28:16 --> 01:28:20
			Okay, so put out what to 250 or
something. Yeah.
		
01:28:23 --> 01:28:28
			Now it's open. I opened the front
door. Okay, so, secondly, in the
		
01:28:28 --> 01:28:28
			masjid
		
01:28:29 --> 01:28:35
			Tuesday, um, they're given classes
from 530 to seven.
		
01:28:36 --> 01:28:37
			You can sit on those classes
		
01:28:39 --> 01:28:39
			tonight.
		
01:28:40 --> 01:28:44
			What's What's the gentleman's name
who gave that? Tonight we have an
		
01:28:44 --> 01:28:50
			event John Ressler. We have an
event tonight at 730 with saba.
		
01:28:50 --> 01:28:53
			I'm having a discussion with the
members of one okay.
		
01:28:55 --> 01:29:00
			That's for young professionals.
Okay, it's not for men for made
		
01:29:00 --> 01:29:03
			for marriage, but it's the same
people the same age of people who
		
01:29:03 --> 01:29:05
			want to get married. So it comes
to that.
		
01:29:06 --> 01:29:11
			Number three, every Thursday is a
big night at mbyc I'm there I give
		
01:29:11 --> 01:29:14
			I read from the books have to sold
off
		
01:29:15 --> 01:29:16
			the books of sea damage Zoo.
		
01:29:17 --> 01:29:21
			Good. Works of two so Wolf. And
then we have Knight of sulla on
		
01:29:21 --> 01:29:24
			the prophets of Allah who it was
sudden, next year, it's going to
		
01:29:24 --> 01:29:29
			be to sofern our daughter fetch
classes for hour and a half, two
		
01:29:29 --> 01:29:33
			hours. Then night of Salah on the
Prophet where we read the poetry
		
01:29:33 --> 01:29:37
			and the salah on the prophet from
at Habib Omar have been said and
		
01:29:37 --> 01:29:37
			been huffy.
		
01:29:38 --> 01:29:41
			Every Friday night, we got
something going on but this
		
01:29:41 --> 01:29:45
			Friday, the youth are going to New
York, I don't think I'm gone. I
		
01:29:45 --> 01:29:47
			think I need to just take the
night off to prepare for the ombre
		
01:29:47 --> 01:29:52
			trip. So this Friday, I won't be
coming down to the masjid. But
		
01:29:55 --> 01:29:58
			the youth will be going to New
York City for the youth night. All
		
01:29:58 --> 01:29:59
			right, but every
		
01:30:00 --> 01:30:05
			a Friday night I'm in the mosque
and every Juma we're in the masjid
		
01:30:05 --> 01:30:08
			and then we go out to lunch. That
lunch is so important. I can't
		
01:30:08 --> 01:30:12
			tell you it's one of the son of
many automat that they they do
		
01:30:12 --> 01:30:16
			that okay? And have a luncheon and
Sheila, here's Jennifer Phillips
		
01:30:16 --> 01:30:21
			Shaka question is the third a way
to temple. Actually the current
		
01:30:21 --> 01:30:26
			Masjid there that the Jews haven't
been able to recognize
		
01:30:29 --> 01:30:33
			is it I don't know. Good question.
Hey, Zog can you look that up or
		
01:30:33 --> 01:30:38
			you get kicked off a Facebook if
you can you look up if the temple
		
01:30:40 --> 01:30:45
			Okay, the third way to Temple is
in the location of the mosque of
		
01:30:45 --> 01:30:50
			AXA muscle oxide or not. We have I
am sitting here with one of the
		
01:30:50 --> 01:30:55
			top programmers of Facebook. He's
working on meta. He is a believer
		
01:30:55 --> 01:30:59
			in meta, that meta is actually
something that's gonna happen.
		
01:30:59 --> 01:31:05
			Okay. And I'm telling you why it
might happen because Zuck needs a
		
01:31:05 --> 01:31:09
			success. Tell me the last product
he did that was successful.
		
01:31:12 --> 01:31:19
			He bought it. Instagram. He bought
it. Right. WhatsApp. He bought it.
		
01:31:20 --> 01:31:22
			Facebook. He stole it.
		
01:31:24 --> 01:31:29
			successes. Yes to steal. Yeah. But
		
01:31:30 --> 01:31:31
			yeah.
		
01:31:32 --> 01:31:36
			Virginia steel. Yes. Steve Jobs,
right. Look.
		
01:31:37 --> 01:31:41
			Musk though, does stuff you have
to admit that Tesla was in his
		
01:31:41 --> 01:31:44
			invention. But he took it and made
it a reality those those two guys
		
01:31:44 --> 01:31:48
			were gonna fail. Right? The guys
who founded Tesla were they
		
01:31:48 --> 01:31:51
			weren't sharp. They weren't
strong. They weren't gangsters.
		
01:31:51 --> 01:31:56
			Right. He took it a major reality.
SpaceX, it's the satellite, anyone
		
01:31:56 --> 01:31:59
			could buy a satellite, right? But
he just keeps buying satellites.
		
01:31:59 --> 01:32:04
			So he has neuro link now. The
Tesla just released a robot. Tesla
		
01:32:04 --> 01:32:08
			is going to be the leader in
robots. He saw the robot today,
		
01:32:08 --> 01:32:08
			right?
		
01:32:10 --> 01:32:14
			Yeah, on Oculus prime, what's his
name? What's the Transformers
		
01:32:14 --> 01:32:17
			name? Optimus Prime. That's what
he called it.
		
01:32:19 --> 01:32:22
			Shouldn't have gone dancing
everything but it walks like it
		
01:32:22 --> 01:32:25
			has to go to the bathroom. Right?
Did you see it?
		
01:32:27 --> 01:32:31
			Optimus you guys didn't see he
released a video on Optimus today.
		
01:32:31 --> 01:32:35
			Right? Optimus is his new robot.
Okay.
		
01:32:36 --> 01:32:38
			I don't know what Optimus what
that robot for regular people is
		
01:32:38 --> 01:32:42
			going to do, we'll find we will
definitely find uses for it. But
		
01:32:42 --> 01:32:43
			eventually my worry is that
		
01:32:44 --> 01:32:47
			eventually it's going to be used
for war and policing. And there's
		
01:32:47 --> 01:32:51
			been no empathy. See, the thing
is, in policing, there's empathy.
		
01:32:52 --> 01:32:55
			When when a police pulls you over,
or stops or something, there's
		
01:32:55 --> 01:32:59
			some chance I can talk to him and
he could see that I'm in distress.
		
01:32:59 --> 01:33:02
			But if I'm speeding, let's say for
example, and there's Hey, hold on,
		
01:33:02 --> 01:33:05
			my wife's about to have a baby and
I get stopped by a robot. There's
		
01:33:05 --> 01:33:09
			no some of that empathy is a
problem. lack of empathy, I should
		
01:33:09 --> 01:33:09
			say.
		
01:33:17 --> 01:33:20
			I don't like it now hoping up. I
hope doesn't end up policing us
		
01:33:20 --> 01:33:22
			now. Yeah. Yeah.
		
01:33:23 --> 01:33:25
			That's a moral dilemma.
		
01:33:27 --> 01:33:31
			Yeah, big moral dilemma on AI and
wars, because that's why I think
		
01:33:31 --> 01:33:34
			like if you have that robot, and
that robot kills a baby, no one's
		
01:33:34 --> 01:33:37
			gonna be responsible because
they're just gonna say a glitch.
		
01:33:37 --> 01:33:38
			Right.
		
01:33:40 --> 01:33:44
			Right. And no one will actually
feel guilty either. Like when you
		
01:33:44 --> 01:33:48
			do that stuff. War Crimes usually
come to an end because people they
		
01:33:48 --> 01:33:51
			know someone's guilty but if you
keep saying oh, this is an
		
01:33:51 --> 01:33:52
			accident, it's a glitch.
		
01:33:55 --> 01:33:58
			Alright, so tell me if you got
find out about the Third Temple,
		
01:33:58 --> 01:33:59
			and then then I have to leave.
		
01:34:01 --> 01:34:05
			Jonnie date seed says, I'm
supposed to follow one of the four
		
01:34:05 --> 01:34:11
			Imams The answer is yes, we
Muslims believe that the the early
		
01:34:11 --> 01:34:13
			scholars they sought to find the
truth and they develop these
		
01:34:13 --> 01:34:16
			methodologies. Truth About What
when we have the Quran Listen, we
		
01:34:16 --> 01:34:20
			have the truth, right? But the
Quran and the Hadith have texts in
		
01:34:20 --> 01:34:23
			them have verses have had eats
that can have multiple meanings.
		
01:34:24 --> 01:34:28
			And there are some narrations from
companions. They heard something
		
01:34:28 --> 01:34:30
			from the Prophet other companions
heard something else from the
		
01:34:30 --> 01:34:33
			profit. How do we bring these two
together? Which one do we choose?
		
01:34:34 --> 01:34:37
			Okay, some companions understood a
verse of Quran meaning one thing
		
01:34:37 --> 01:34:39
			others understood it meaning
another thing which one do we go
		
01:34:39 --> 01:34:44
			by? So in that realm of things, we
need scholarship. When you when
		
01:34:44 --> 01:34:47
			you were not scholars, we're going
to seek out the scholars and
		
01:34:47 --> 01:34:51
			follow their scholarship. When we
follow their scholarship. You're
		
01:34:51 --> 01:34:56
			essentially following the person
you believe is most worthy of
		
01:34:56 --> 01:34:59
			following and you're following the
methodology
		
01:35:00 --> 01:35:02
			that you believe is the right
methodology. So what do you do you
		
01:35:02 --> 01:35:06
			study the 40 memes, watch their
videos, read books about them
		
01:35:06 --> 01:35:10
			study all four give yourself a
whole year just to let it settle
		
01:35:10 --> 01:35:13
			you're not going to study like
boom, boom, boom No, you're going
		
01:35:13 --> 01:35:16
			to study overtime let things
marinate in your mind observe
		
01:35:16 --> 01:35:21
			mosques, observe scholars then
make a decision of who you believe
		
01:35:21 --> 01:35:27
			is most worthy of following Okay,
that's how simple it is. Okay,
		
01:35:27 --> 01:35:29
			it's like picking a doctor
		
01:35:30 --> 01:35:30
			okay
		
01:35:41 --> 01:35:43
			you gotta go I gotta run okay a
		
01:35:54 --> 01:35:55
			lot of questions coming in here
		
01:36:06 --> 01:36:08
			bring on multi level lathe.
		
01:36:09 --> 01:36:10
			Please
		
01:36:15 --> 01:36:20
			purify our comm or chat section
here from this nonsense
		
01:36:31 --> 01:36:33
			can we take theater from Muhammad
sucks? I don't know who he is.
		
01:36:33 --> 01:36:37
			Maybe I should look him up. Rose
Gold. Can you explain the verse?
		
01:36:37 --> 01:36:39
			Allah doesn't change your
conditionally unless you change
		
01:36:39 --> 01:36:42
			what is it within yourself? It
means you know what this verse
		
01:36:42 --> 01:36:47
			came out of a group of Benny
astroglia in the ancient times,
		
01:36:47 --> 01:36:52
			and had a prophet, they obeyed
that Prophet, they lived by that
		
01:36:52 --> 01:36:59
			the Torah. They were so righteous.
Then Allah subhana wa Tada
		
01:36:59 --> 01:37:03
			stabilized their monarchy. Their
village gave them wealth, their
		
01:37:03 --> 01:37:06
			children were coming out good.
Okay, it doesn't mean there's no
		
01:37:06 --> 01:37:10
			problems in life, but in general,
no major issues. Their enemies
		
01:37:10 --> 01:37:13
			were at bay, their market was
moving, their marriages were
		
01:37:13 --> 01:37:17
			successful, their kids were good.
They notice of how to how much
		
01:37:17 --> 01:37:22
			clay is coming in, in our in our
world, in our society in our
		
01:37:22 --> 01:37:25
			lives. So how much goodness so
they went to their Prophet and
		
01:37:25 --> 01:37:30
			they said we're worried to lose
this goodness, then Allah revealed
		
01:37:30 --> 01:37:33
			to him Allah will not change your
condition. All this goodness
		
01:37:33 --> 01:37:37
			unless you change what is within
yourselves. So it originally came
		
01:37:37 --> 01:37:42
			down was revealed for goodness.
Okay. So if you're thinking
		
01:37:42 --> 01:37:45
			everything's going well, it's
going to continue to go well as
		
01:37:45 --> 01:37:50
			long as you're following the Cydia
and abiding by it and remembering
		
01:37:50 --> 01:37:52
			Allah much and devoting yourself
to your Creator.
		
01:37:53 --> 01:37:56
			It also applies to the opposite
when we're in bad in a bad state.
		
01:37:57 --> 01:38:00
			Bad political condition, bad
worldly condition. It's never
		
01:38:00 --> 01:38:04
			going to change unless we correct
ourselves. Right? fix our hearts,
		
01:38:04 --> 01:38:07
			fix our deeds, start following
this video and start devoting
		
01:38:07 --> 01:38:09
			ourselves to Allah subhanaw taala.
Okay.
		
01:38:12 --> 01:38:15
			The Albert Pike prophecy has me
deeply worried I need some hope.
		
01:38:15 --> 01:38:18
			Could you expound upon it? Yeah,
they made it Satan made a big
		
01:38:18 --> 01:38:20
			mistake. He doesn't realize that
Allah to Allah
		
01:38:21 --> 01:38:27
			is going to bring down an Imam and
Mandy Prophet isover mme and
		
01:38:27 --> 01:38:33
			Iblees is making a simple mistake
that he is going to outdo God's
		
01:38:33 --> 01:38:37
			plan. He's not going to do God's
plan. But there will be trickery
		
01:38:37 --> 01:38:42
			that he does in the world mass
level of trickery, mass level of
		
01:38:42 --> 01:38:45
			lies, we're already seeing it it's
just happening in slow motion
		
01:38:45 --> 01:38:49
			because real life happens in slow
motion 90% of the time. All right,
		
01:38:49 --> 01:38:51
			and ALLAH SubhanA wa Tada said,
		
01:38:52 --> 01:38:55
			there will always be people upon
the truth. And Allah to Allah said
		
01:38:55 --> 01:38:58
			there will always be people coming
into the truth and the numbers of
		
01:38:58 --> 01:39:01
			Muslims will always be on the
increase. Converts are on the
		
01:39:01 --> 01:39:08
			increase, okay? And so his plan is
is going to fail at that point.
		
01:39:08 --> 01:39:13
			Because up to now he has not yet
messed with Allah of Islam in the
		
01:39:13 --> 01:39:16
			sense of these three world wars.
The first he said, it's all about
		
01:39:16 --> 01:39:20
			Europe. Second one is establish
Israel also was in Europe, the
		
01:39:20 --> 01:39:25
			third one this one is against the
OMA of Islam, so it's not going to
		
01:39:25 --> 01:39:32
			succeed and whatever appears like
success will be against him. Okay,
		
01:39:32 --> 01:39:37
			we'll turn back against him. Come
up to Boston. Yes. So I'll come up
		
01:39:37 --> 01:39:39
			to Boston and Charlotte have to
come up to Boston and these big
		
01:39:39 --> 01:39:42
			cities, please invite Schicksal
demand via email. I will inshallah
		
01:39:42 --> 01:39:46
			to add up. Ladies and gentlemen,
I'd love to hang out with you a
		
01:39:46 --> 01:39:47
			little bit more. But
		
01:39:49 --> 01:39:54
			we have to go to Zakum locator and
everybody Subhanak Allahu mobie
		
01:39:54 --> 01:39:59
			100 A shadow and Illa Illa. Anta
nests offer quantity with a cola
		
01:40:00 --> 01:40:04
			Sit in Santa Fe because Illa
Latina Mo Mo Salah hurt. What also
		
01:40:04 --> 01:40:09
			will have to also be sub Mohammed
Koulibaly go to Masjid Al Hussein,
		
01:40:09 --> 01:40:14
			go to my selenium Emma sheffey If
you only have time for to massage
		
01:40:14 --> 01:40:18
			it if not then there are nine of
these masajid all in a row. Mr.
		
01:40:18 --> 01:40:22
			Hussein Al Azhar Sharif master
chef I say the Zainab say da Isha.
		
01:40:23 --> 01:40:23
			See the
		
01:40:24 --> 01:40:30
			deer. There are nine such masajid
so go to all of them just below
		
01:40:30 --> 01:40:30
			head on.
		
01:40:32 --> 01:40:36
			Oh, well it's the Oscars over I
just did it within myself during
		
01:40:36 --> 01:40:40
			the stream actually was said I'm
on a coma rahmatullah wa barakato.
		
01:41:07 --> 01:41:08
			Job
		
01:41:16 --> 01:41:16
			know
		
01:41:19 --> 01:41:19
			who
		
01:41:24 --> 01:41:24
			God