Shadee Elmasry – 7 The Three Times Divorce Fatwa

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The transcript is a conversation between two speakers discussing the issue of divorce and the use of fat words in various media outlets. They discuss the use of fat words in media outlets, including Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, and how they can affect the perception of divorce. They also mention the importance of finding the right balance between the method used to divorce and the method used to divorce in various media outlets.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:05

Now, if I can go into some of the Furusawa, if you don't mind, and

00:00:05 --> 00:00:09

this is where things get interesting in the fatawa, Ibn

00:00:09 --> 00:00:15

Taymiyyah, if we can get into some funny things, the three times

00:00:15 --> 00:00:21

divorce fatwah is a very popular photo, namely that it happens and

00:00:21 --> 00:00:25

there is a function, I have to say that many, many people in the Desi

00:00:25 --> 00:00:30

community they actually misunderstand and believe that the

00:00:30 --> 00:00:35

luck layup Elizabeth Aletheia, that divorce does not even occur.

00:00:36 --> 00:00:39

That the correct method to do divorce is by saying it three

00:00:39 --> 00:00:43

times. And I have to say that didn't now we're going we're

00:00:43 --> 00:00:47

zooming into the local issues here that this happens all the time and

00:00:47 --> 00:00:50

they bring up Imitate me as fatwah and many, many Arab scholars

00:00:51 --> 00:00:55

utilize him and Tamia is Fretwell on this. So, as somebody

00:00:55 --> 00:01:02

representative, can you tell us is this the math hub of is this a

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05

permissible Fetzer to be utilized according to the HANA villa,

00:01:05 --> 00:01:08

because according to the other three methods, they say no, but

00:01:08 --> 00:01:10

according to the HANA villa, can they use that?

00:01:12 --> 00:01:16

This was one of the one of the issues that the Schaefer karumi

00:01:16 --> 00:01:20

mentioned in his book, that I have just mentioned, that he, he

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23

authored this book and in the introduction, he mentioned this as

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26

an example of the issues that will be

00:01:28 --> 00:01:32

tackled in the book. He said this can never be a position in

00:01:32 --> 00:01:36

development, there is difference between the line the composition

00:01:36 --> 00:01:40

of the method and the position in general. And I believe that most

00:01:40 --> 00:01:46

of the listeners understand this, a position in the manner means a

00:01:46 --> 00:01:50

position that can be humbling regardless of being

00:01:53 --> 00:01:58

of having the qualifications that make them realize composition or

00:01:58 --> 00:02:01

not, sometimes it can never be the reliable composition. It's still a

00:02:01 --> 00:02:05

position in the nether but it can never be relied upon position

00:02:05 --> 00:02:08

because it was said by one of the companions, one of the scholars of

00:02:08 --> 00:02:14

the method and there is a fatwa by admin. So I will always be

00:02:15 --> 00:02:19

oh, there are a lot of composition. This can can never be

00:02:19 --> 00:02:24

a Hambali position check. Listen to me, I said, my grandfather, who

00:02:24 --> 00:02:30

we are talking about like the main to mache of the mother after

00:02:30 --> 00:02:34

handing off what are the MME is dealing with me. He said My

00:02:34 --> 00:02:40

grandfather used to give this fat word that and I'm surprised that

00:02:40 --> 00:02:45

some people misunderstand the fat word that should be rejected. But

00:02:45 --> 00:02:46

the fact of the matter is that

00:02:48 --> 00:02:49

a lot of stress Yeah.

00:02:50 --> 00:02:56

It's only one they have divorced your your wife but one one only

00:02:56 --> 00:02:58

it's not three.

00:02:59 --> 00:03:02

This is the photo of the day me and he said that his grandfather

00:03:02 --> 00:03:04

used to give this flatware secret.

00:03:06 --> 00:03:10

I said, even okay, even if this doesn't this, doesn't this

00:03:10 --> 00:03:15

indicate anything? Maybe measure the deem that great safe of the

00:03:15 --> 00:03:16

metal?

00:03:17 --> 00:03:21

Maybe he did so. We believe that the tenure they made is not first,

00:03:21 --> 00:03:21

right.

00:03:23 --> 00:03:27

I believe in thinking he his grand father dates.

00:03:29 --> 00:03:33

Secretly secretly doesn't this indicate anything? He didn't tell

00:03:33 --> 00:03:39

this to be mentioned known narrated from him though to be one

00:03:39 --> 00:03:42

of the many positions the realized composition of the company must

00:03:42 --> 00:03:46

have is that this palette is big.

00:03:47 --> 00:03:52

This is an innovation This is haram and it is three times

00:03:52 --> 00:03:53

divorce.

00:03:54 --> 00:03:55

Okay, good.

Share Page