Shadee Elmasry – 4 No Real Conflict Ash’aris

			How does the how somebody, you
mentioned two things, which I'm
		

			curious about.
		

			You first mentioned that it's not
even correct to enter into this
		

			conflict and try to refute that
shadow. That's number one. And if
		

			you can explain why that is. And
number two, you said, even if we
		

			did, it would end in two seconds.
So could you explain both of those
		

			points?
		

			Let's start with the fourth have,
we ended in two seconds.
		

			Let's talk about the SR era. In
particular, when I say VSI, in
		

			particular, then I'm not
addressing the Metro media for
		

			instance.
		

			Hanbury actually conflict. The
problem basically is in the issue
		

			of that we've detailed
interpretation of Lhasa treatment
		

			111 statement, this is part of
		

			the discussion period, the
discussion at all. But what you're
		

			doing is hot or cold. And I'm Lady
lighter. And to explain this,
		

			you're not saying you are talking
about the last panel data without
		

			knowledge. And it doesn't mean
knowledge means certainty, which
		

			is the same thing that they say?
And they say, No, we have setup.
		

			And we are following something
that
		

			we have already established in our
magazine.
		

			So the 100, the traditional humbly
approach is to say, we're not
		

			accepting the narrations that you
say about the setup period. And
		

			we're not entering into this
meeting. So we're not even sitting
		

			at the table.
		

			Yes, because the Hamdani position
this this is something that we
		

			learn in our books Iraqi, which is
said which will sit by himself.
		

			Now they allow,
		

			we do not argue we do not have
disputes we do not discuss when it
		

			comes to the matters of attitude.
And we explained that before this,
		

			this method is really good. By the
way, the rest of of not discussing
		

			not having disputes, not having
debates. This is a very good
		

			method. We can talk about it
later. This was the point about
		

			why it ends in two seconds. And by
the way, there is a sad part of
		

			it. Okay, we accept your mishap.
Then as of of the fleet, we accept
		

			your method, and it's one of our
two choices, then.
		

			Why bother?
		

			And that's why you're saying that
		

			the idea of conflict with Russia
IRA is also not Madhu P not
		

			desirable.
		

			That's why at some point in
history, they decided that
		

			although this is a matter that we
do not accept the matter of it
		

			that way, but in the end, you say
It's haram. When you say haram,
		

			when you say where do you when you
say Mr. Have? What kind of ruling
		

			is this? It's this is this is a 30
ruling. This is how we didn't say
		

			this is Cuf or this is Fisk.
		

			It's haram right? Yes. In the end,
does it affect there are Kedah
		

			know Yanni someone met doing this
same good example
		

			is if it is not affected, because
it doesn't affect or harm the
		

			issue of victim Z.
		

			I say good