Shadee Elmasry – 10 A Dream Imam Ahmad & The Misrepresentation of His School

Shadee Elmasry
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the current climate and the importance of not considering Han bleeding, as it is a part of their culture. They also mention a former student's statement about being naughty and how it led them to be upset. The speaker suggests that focusing on the Hanbali Mazhar rather than the Han bleeding issue would be beneficial for students in the USA.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:01 --> 00:00:01
			Sheikh, that
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:03
			that,
		
00:00:04 --> 00:00:07
			example that you gave about Imam Ahmed and
		
00:00:07 --> 00:00:07
			his practice,
		
00:00:09 --> 00:00:10
			We live in a turbulent time here.
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:13
			So that leads into,
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:16
			my next question
		
00:00:17 --> 00:00:19
			is what advice
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:21
			would you give to your students here in
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:22
			America
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
			considering
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:26
			the current climate
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:30
			with those who claim to be espousing Hanabi
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:30
			La,
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:34
			but yet, essentially, they're teaching something different.
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:37
			And I would even add to that
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:40
			to my own question because I
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:42
			I have seen and heard people say
		
00:00:43 --> 00:00:44
			who claim to be humbly,
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:46
			but who would say
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:48
			that Imam Ahmed is not a hudja.
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:50
			And
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:53
			this really bothered me because
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:58
			I have never heard anyone say that Imam
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:00
			Ahmed was not a neither. And or anybody
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:01
			else
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:05
			Imam Ahmed. They've been humble.
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:08
			So if you could touch on that for
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:09
			us, Jazak.
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:13
			So you said that Hamdani is saying that
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:15
			is not a. Is that what you said?
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:17
			This was a part of what you said?
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:17
			Yes.
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:23
			I,
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:26
			I saw Muhammad
		
00:01:27 --> 00:01:28
			in a dream,
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:30
			and he kept describing
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:32
			how he was tortured by, Nur Eptasim
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:36
			and these difficult times that he went through.
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:38
			And he showed me things that I haven't,
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:40
			read the in books. And then I went
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:41
			to my sheikh and told
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:45
			now and I went to my sheikh and
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:46
			I told him about this,
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:50
			this this dream. I told him he kept
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:51
			describing this to me and you you were
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:53
			with me. My sheikh
		
00:01:54 --> 00:01:57
			was with me in the dream and he,
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:00
			and and it was really, really difficult and
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:02
			it was wasn't a pleasant
		
00:02:03 --> 00:02:03
			experience.
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:05
			Yeah. Yeah. I wish I didn't see any
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:07
			of that. I I was pleased that I
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:08
			saw the man himself,
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:09
			but,
		
00:02:10 --> 00:02:11
			but it was it was really,
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:13
			it was really bad how he described,
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:16
			the torch and everything. So I told him,
		
00:02:16 --> 00:02:18
			what is the interpretation? What do you think
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:20
			of that? And And usually, my shield doesn't
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:23
			really interpret any dream. He's he usually says,
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:25
			yeah. This is good. This is okay. It's
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:26
			Bushra.
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:29
			Go on. Continue what you are doing. This
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:30
			is a good sign. In this dream in
		
00:02:30 --> 00:02:32
			particular, he said, yes.
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:35
			This is a sign that Lima Mohammed that
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:37
			that there is a lot of waiting
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:39
			for for us, Hanabi.
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:42
			And I guess if, this this is one
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			part of the to hear about the Hanbali
		
00:02:45 --> 00:02:45
			who considers,
		
00:02:46 --> 00:02:48
			who doesn't consider that Hanbal Hut.
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:52
			As if he can can sometimes
		
00:02:55 --> 00:02:55
			have this,
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:59
			liberty of not considering Amber Heard because in
		
00:02:59 --> 00:03:01
			the end, Scheifei is is good.
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:05
			Let me talk in points.
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:10
			First of all, ham, hambani not considering Ahmed
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:11
			to be heard,
		
00:03:12 --> 00:03:13
			means that he is not hambeli.
		
00:03:14 --> 00:03:15
			Because as
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:18
			many scholars said, in the hambeli must have
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:20
			empty other than the hip. The
		
00:03:20 --> 00:03:21
			one,
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:22
			whom you follow,
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:28
			The one whom you follow
		
00:03:28 --> 00:03:29
			in fit.
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:30
			These statements
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:31
			are evidence
		
00:03:32 --> 00:03:33
			for you.
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:36
			Your evidence is not a Quran or Sunnah
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:38
			because you have no access to Al Quran
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:40
			or Sunnah when it comes to interpreting the
		
00:03:40 --> 00:03:43
			Quran or Sunnah or extracting rulings from Quran
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:43
			or Sunnah.
		
00:03:44 --> 00:03:47
			This is an agreed upon issue among the
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:49
			scholars of Usul al Firkth.
		
00:03:50 --> 00:03:53
			If not agreed upon, this is the
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:56
			the Hanabili hate to claim an Ishmael.
		
00:03:56 --> 00:03:59
			Let's not call it agreed upon issue, but
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:02
			at least this is the method of the
		
00:04:02 --> 00:04:03
			majority of,
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:06
			Osuli's talks. This is one thing. That's why
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08
			in the Hambali field, he books like
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:11
			the hashiya of, Al Adelid
		
00:04:12 --> 00:04:13
			Khalid. Said,
		
00:04:14 --> 00:04:15
			Al al Mazhab al Ahmad al Ahmad al
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:16
			Ahmad al Ahmad.
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:19
			Madhab al Ahmad. The the most praised madhab,
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:20
			the best madhab,
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:23
			the madhab of Ilham Ahmed. Yes. Those this
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:25
			is said this was said by Ahmed Beni.
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:29
			If Shefiri is better than Ahmed, you become
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:30
			Shefiri.
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:32
			It's simple, and it doesn't include any
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:34
			hatred or anything.
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:38
			This is one, this is one thing. Another
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:38
			thing,
		
00:04:43 --> 00:04:44
			I'm not sure if this was a part
		
00:04:44 --> 00:04:45
			of your question here,
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:46
			Like
		
00:04:49 --> 00:04:49
			in, the is
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:53
			the which can be represented by the Hanbali,
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:54
			only the Hanbali
		
00:04:54 --> 00:04:57
			who studied with the Hanbali, who received the
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:58
			Mazab from the Hanbali.
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:00
			Let's help
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:02
			each other
		
00:05:02 --> 00:05:03
			in stopping
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:04
			the of
		
00:05:06 --> 00:05:07
			teaching,
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:07
			talking,
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:10
			falsely,
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:11
			contributing
		
00:05:12 --> 00:05:14
			to something without being qualified enough to do
		
00:05:14 --> 00:05:15
			so.
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:17
			So if you want to talk about the
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:20
			Hanbali Mazhar, then you studied the Hanbali Mazhar
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:21
			with someone
		
00:05:21 --> 00:05:22
			who is Hanbali.
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:25
			The idea of a senate that the sheikh
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:26
			doctor,
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:27
			started with.
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:34
			Let's, stop these, innovations of
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:37
			Hambeli Teini, Hambeli,
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:39
			you know, podana's branch, Hambeli,
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:42
			Cali Abbiales branch.
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:47
			This is a a of one of the
		
00:05:47 --> 00:05:48
			greatest aim,
		
00:05:50 --> 00:05:51
			of Muslim.
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:52
			It's not
		
00:05:54 --> 00:05:57
			it's not a restaurant or something like that.
		
00:05:57 --> 00:05:58
			Yeah.
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:04
			People in the United States in particular, they
		
00:06:04 --> 00:06:06
			need to be focused on more.
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:09
			I know that, the circumstances
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:11
			and the environment might not be really
		
00:06:11 --> 00:06:12
			helpful,
		
00:06:13 --> 00:06:14
			but in the end,
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:16
			if you are focused more on Elm, especially
		
00:06:17 --> 00:06:18
			that you have a lot of chances on
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:19
			the Internet now,
		
00:06:20 --> 00:06:22
			this will definitely
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:26
			be better than getting in such disputes of
		
00:06:26 --> 00:06:28
			Hambani, the branch of so and so. Hambani,
		
00:06:28 --> 00:06:29
			the branch of so and so. When I
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:30
			started studying,
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:33
			I found the Salafishi. I went to him.
		
00:06:33 --> 00:06:35
			I wasn't Salaf. I was never Salaf. I
		
00:06:35 --> 00:06:36
			went to him and they benefited.
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:40
			I met my sheikh who's who's who's in
		
00:06:40 --> 00:06:41
			Salafi,
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:43
			and they benefited from him.
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:44
			If
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:46
			if if if not for
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:49
			the Salafi issue being really harsh
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:51
			and that they rejected me afterwards and they
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:52
			called me,
		
00:06:53 --> 00:06:55
			and stuff like that, I would be able
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:56
			to mention the names.
		
00:06:57 --> 00:06:58
			In the end,
		
00:06:59 --> 00:07:01
			if you focus more on
		
00:07:01 --> 00:07:03
			and forget about
		
00:07:03 --> 00:07:06
			that the trendy things,
		
00:07:06 --> 00:07:08
			this would definitely
		
00:07:08 --> 00:07:10
			be better for, especially especially.
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:13
			Yeah. Not for the students
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:15
			in the UK, for the students in the
		
00:07:15 --> 00:07:16
			USA.
		
00:07:16 --> 00:07:17
			Yes.