Mohammed Hijab – Reacting to Young Earth Creationist Ken Ham Dinosaurs are 6000 years old

			This audio is brought to you by Muslim Central. please consider donating to help cover our running
costs and future projects by visiting www dot Muslim central.com forward slash donate. So this
manual this manual for learning the basic features of reading the Arabic language for chronic use is
one of the most accessible manuals I've actually ever seen is what we have on the market,
unfortunately at the moment is, is a range of inaccessible manuals, which we can't actually doesn't
have the scaffolding that is required in order to get maneuver someone from a stage where they don't
know how to read to a stage where they can actually feel comfortable reading. This is one of those
		

			manuals, which is extremely accessible is carefully paced, structured, and it has all these kinds of
features. Once again, pedagogical features which will bring people from a stage where they don't
know things to being able to read the Quran.
		

			salaam aleikum wa rahmatullah wa barakato. How are you guys doing? I'm here joined with the beast,
the Tao of beast. He is a man who has created a legacy for himself, even though he doesn't like to
be in front of the camera Zhi Shan
		

			that never gets old. Yeah. How's it? How's it good?
		

			All right, you know, what triphosphates
		

			would you have for us today? Alright, so basically, I've always wanted to do a response to this guy
right here, this guy, Ken Ham, who is a young age creationist. And just to give people a background
as to what young age creationism is, is a group of Protestants for the most part, right? Who believe
that the universe is 6000 years old, based on the accounts of Genesis chapter five. And because of
other things, for example, what church fathers have said majority of which probably would concur
with that view. And many of the kinds of scholars of Christianity throughout the reform, period,
etc. So they have a strong case from their own paradigm. In fact, they have probably the winning
		

			case from their own paradigm. But what what that entails believing that the universe is 6000 years
is denial of certain things, which we may think are undeniable. So let's I wanted to look at today
what he thinks about dinosaurs. Okay, interesting. Dinosaurs well, dinosaur quite million years old,
on combi. So I'm about
		

			6000 years old 5500?
		

			What really happened to the dinosaurs?
		

			Many people are perplexed by the topic of dinosaurs. Where did they come from? When did they live?
What happened to them? You see, when you dig up a dinosaur skeleton, it doesn't come with a label
attached saying Hi, I'm 65 million years old. And this is what happened to me. So the
		

			skeleton in relation to the past? So where did dinosaurs come from? What happened to them? When did
they live? I want to show you that when you take God at His Word in the book of Genesis, that we can
explain dinosaurs and observational science actually confirms that explanation basically.
		

			So but by the way, he redefines everything, right? So when he talks about observational science,
he's talking about what we've observed. He denies the fact that any inference can be made from
science. So for him, he writes in his book, he's written a book on this. And he talks about he's got
his own kind of categorizations command, Ken Ham does. The thing is to be honest, it's not like
there's no scope in Christianity, for saying that the Yom because the word yom is actually using the
Quran, and also using the Genesis account as well as it's exactly the same word. And Hebrew as yom
could mean a long period of time. But for them, it's not that is Genesis chapter five, right? which
		

			talks about because what what if you look at Genesis chapter five, you'll see it's like Adam, and
then his son was this person, and then his genealogy and have dates either have dates, like each, so
it's like, every person's like 140 years between the first person 100, and whatever it is. So they
added up. So this person called Asha, a bishop, Asha, famously, he found out when the beginning of
the world was and so on. So this is where he's coming from. And it's true to say, the vast majority,
if not, I think all of them except for the alexandrian School of church fathers believed would
concur with this. If not, they didn't have anything to say about it, but the reformist kind of
		

			theologians and stuff, they believe in that as well. So 6000 year old thing, it might seem trivial
to us, now we're having a laugh. But this was, I would say, the vast majority opinion in
Christendom. So the Orthodox belief is, it's an orthodox belief. Yes. Interesting. See, the Bible
tells us that God made the land animals on day six of creation, and who else was created on day six?
Well, Adam and Eve, and how long ago was that? is really interesting because the Bible does talk
about
		

			the kind of day by day creation everyone knows is, the thing is, it's so contradictory. Like when
you Oh,
		

			But it's not only as contradictory to the external reality or archaeological paleontological
evidence. Yeah. But it's contradictory of itself. Like, for example, in the Bible, it says that day
and night were created in the first day. And then on day four. Okay, now, on day four, the
luminaries were created. So the sun and all these kinds of things were created, right? And so the
question would be, how can you have night and day without the right How can you? And then you talked
about the vegetation, right and vegetation. And that was a great vegetation on in Genesis chapter
one, verse 11, that was created. On the fourth day, I think it was, well, third day mountain, right.
		

			But then in Genesis chapter two, verse five, no plant has sprung up yet.
		

			So you have contradictions within so much. So the origin of Alexandra, who is an allegory, for the
most part, he spiritualize, the meanings of the text, he looked at and said, What man of
intelligence, I'm going to put these references in the comment section below, what man of
intelligence would believe that the luminaries were created on the fourth day, and that the night
and day will create the hazard? So you have internal contradictions, okay, and then you have
external problems as well. So this has led these kinds of people to just stick to their guns and
say, must be science that's wrong. Okay. I must be history. That's wrong. Must be paleontology.
		

			That's wrong. Must be archaeology. That's wrong. All of those things are wrong. And we all right,
that's interesting. From a weight, I think there's a little bit of credit needs to be given because
they didn't feel insecure. They said no, the Bible. I do agree. Yeah. However, the fact that you
accept Bible to be true, yes, shows that the Bible is not true. Right. Does that make sense? Yeah.
So for example, they say, look, we're not going to go and be like, change the word, God's word.
We're going to stick to it. But the fact that you stick to it shows that it's not a word of Right,
right. It's an interesting paradox. Yeah, it's interesting. Yeah. Well, when you add up all the data
		

			in the Bible about 6000 years, so taking God at His Word in Genesis, dinosaurs lived beside people
about 6000 years ago. And they were vegetarian to start with Genesis chapter one, verse 29, tells us
that all the animals are vegetarian. But then we just say one more thing, Bravo, this guy. Answers
in Genesis is one of the most well funded organizations in the United States of America. Okay. When
I looked at the numbers, I think their turnover was something like 100 million charity, 100 million
as 1/10 of a billion pounds, there's no there's no doubt organization on the face of the earth,
which comes close to that comes close to that. And these guys have a museum, okay, they have a
		

			museum where they depict Adam and Eve. And, and, you know, the dinosaurs, side by side, these kinds
of things, bro. But, you know, we can watch a little bit more of this. What can we say? Because we
were just having a conversation about this before the show. Yeah, you know, Christianity is based on
the resurrection, isn't it? And if you believe in the resurrection, it's a historical event. Yes.
		

			So really, if you don't believe in it, you're doomed to * fire.
		

			The mainstream Christian belief, right. So if you're, if you're, if you're doomed to * fire for
not believing in a historical event. Yeah, if you have skepticism, think of it this way. If you have
skepticism towards a historical event, which in this case is the resurrection.
		

			And if you employ the same skepticism to the date of 6000 years, one of one of those types of
historical skepticism will take you to *. In the case of believing that the universe is 6000
years. That's not a problem. But believing that having skipped historical Skepticism on the
resurrection, that one will take you to *. Yeah, exactly. So basically, you have to be certain as
* of the resurrection. Or you go help, you know, you know, that, yeah, you have to be certain as
*, if you're not certain as *, you go in *.
		

			That's what it is. When it comes to this. Yeah. And And the thing is, you know, it's it shows you
the contradiction, you know, either hypocrisy, yes. You know, and to be honest, you know, some
people come to speak to people in the parkins. Because when they come to us and say, you know, the
resurrection is for certain, yeah. Wouldn't you say, from your experience dealing with people that
that could be the central argument for the veracity of Christianity? They want to prove Christianity
through the resurrection. Yeah, exactly. If that's their central arguments, historical argument,
right. Yeah. So okay, on the one hand, we can be, we can't be skeptical when it comes to these
		

			reports. contradictory reports, the New Testament about the resurrection, which, by the way, on his
historical analysis, methodological naturalism is supreme. So we can't even say that supernatural
things happen, okay. If we want it to be completely, you know, in line with secondaries, thing which
we're not, we can give it to them, no problem. But at the end of the day, we can't be skeptical of
the resurrection. Yeah. But you can be skeptical to the entire enterprise of archaeology in the
entire enterprise of paleontology near the entire enterprise of history. And one of those types of
skepticism will lead you in internal doom and burning and the hellfire. Yeah, and the other one
		

			won't. That's what that's beautiful. You know about Islam. hamdulillah you know, Allah doesn't test
Christianity, you deny the resurrection is finished for you. Islam, 100 Allah, Allah says, we do not
punish a nation to within the messenger. You know, Islam is very unique in that span.
		

			Unless they possess the mercy of God, and I'll be honest with a lot of people come to me with the
resurrection thing and they're very certain about that.
		

			Record the Quran came down 600 years later and change the whole narrative and to be in a nutshell,
if the Quran is the word of God, and who knows best history, but God, you know, so if the Quran is
the word of God and Allah is saying that Jesus peace be upon him was not killed nor crucified, but
Allah saved him. I'm gonna go with that, you know, so if there's Christians watching this, you know,
at the end of the day, if you're going to put your trust in this, you know, if you're going to not
deny the resurrection, there is absolute hypocrisy with the whole Genesis account. So to us is if
you read the book of the Quran, and you if you believe it to be God, and there's evidence that
		

			proves Aniston when most recent book, I've got a booklet that I put it on the description box as
well for the evidences for the truth of Islam. Exactly. So then who knows best history, but God and
if God is telling you, Jesus was not killed, nor was he crucified, I'm sorry, I'm taking that to
account rather than this.
		

			He said, I think it's a good point. Yeah, it was good to end with this as well. That way, you could
say you can make the argument if if we have to believe in the resurrection to be Christians. Yeah.
So really, Christianity is based on historical events. Yeah. Whereas the difference between
Christianity and Islam from that perspective, is that Islam is based on a concept and the concept is
submission to one god yes, submission, worship one God. Right. And that I think is the main
difference between the two religions. Yeah, exactly. Oh, yeah. Brahma sisters, you know, if you're
watching this as a Christian, there's books I'm going to put in the link which you can get and you
		

			know, and read that and see for yourself and like I said before, guys, the best person to know
history and what really happened to Jesus peace be upon him. If you go to the Bible, you know, your
dilemma from all angles? Yeah, I was I thought, if I reject the resurrection, which I do, I'm doomed
to *. And it's based on accounts which are you know, Mark Matthew, Luke, the stories that
contradict each other So guys, if the word of the Quran is Word of God, and God knows history, which
he does his own knowing, go and find out really what happened to Jesus peace be upon him, and
instead of worshipping Him, worship the one who created him. And that's it. That's all stuff
		

			Mohammed bro. Pleasure. Sana camera.