Mohammed Hijab – Muslim Disguises Bible Verse as Hadith

Mohammed Hijab
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the importance of laying an foundation on their argument that child marriage is a wrong thing and being open-minded in addressing the issue. They also touch on the religious community and the "has" in the Hadith. The discussion turns to the context and meaning of a statement about "pyna love" and "pyna marriage" in the Bible, with references to slavery and sexualible sex. The importance of accepting the Bible for one's own reference and understanding the Oldvinian laws is emphasized. The speaker offers an independent article on child sexuality and emphasizes the importance of understanding the Bible and the Oldvinian laws.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:01 --> 00:00:01
			Do you believe
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:08
			that Mary was hadn't successful? Other than that she wasn't a virgin? Yes, you did.
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:12
			Yeah, but do you believe that?
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:15
			She has? No, there's no problem. Okay.
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:31
			So let me just because it's now from a logical perspective, what's really, really important, and I
think non partial, Kalam would agree with me here, non partial atheists person would agree with me.
What's really important is that we lay
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:58
			an epistemological foundation. So what I'm going to say to you here is look, is your argument as
follows. Your argument is that the Islam allows child marriage or child having sexual *
with children. One, two, that child marriage is something if you do it is disproves their religion.
Therefore, Islam is disproved as Iraq. So what's your argument?
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:01
			Why no,
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:09
			I'm asking you. Is the argument that you're making? Yeah. Because it's important to understand where
you're coming from.
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:36
			Because it is a presupposition that, look, there's a presupposition to what you're saying, yeah. If
I say to you Now, I'm not saying this, by the way, just for the sake of argument. Yeah. I'm not
saying this. But if I said to Daniel, that having sexual * with pre pubescent people is a
wrong thing. You would agree with me on that? Okay. So if religion, any religion has aspects,
whereby
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:45
			preview essence, there is instruction to have * with them or something like that. That's
wrong. Yeah. Okay. Now, ask your question.
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:48
			So your question was about
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:50
			No problem.
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:59
			Thank you very much. Now it's important, ladies and gentlemen, to get this done, talk about the
situation.
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:10
			Right now. Okay. If I were to call I had this, which is the most severe had these on the matter.
Let's just be open about it.
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:20
			We have to be open. Let's be open about it. Ladies and gentlemen. I have no, I'm gonna I don't care.
You know, we'll say the truth. You know, I don't give a damn.
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:37
			When I quote the holidays, I'm going to quote it with the chain of narration. And with the text of
the Hadith, and I want you to react to the Hadith first and foremost.
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:49
			Tell me what you think of it. And then afterwards, we'll discuss it. Now remember, this all in
context is the most severe thing I've seen on the matter in the whole of why any professor ever
said, Yeah, supposedly so okay.
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:52
			So it says Phil are calm.
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:57
			Mussa even though I'm running Philip, calm.
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:03
			Phil anecdotal.
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:06
			occur in Mill Valley.
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:23
			Yes. Now talking about this in this context. Yes. I have to be honest. This is talking about the
prisoners of war. This is the most severe thing that is the rated Philip Come on. Yeah.
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:28
			We don't know because every publisher is different and all these things you
		
00:03:35 --> 00:03:36
			know, hold on, hold on.
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:39
			Hold on.
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:43
			Wait.
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:50
			Wait, hold on, hold on. Hold on, hold on. Hold on. Hold on. My brother. Listen to it. Daniel.
Daniel, Daniel.
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:53
			is mentioned
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:57
			Cotonou Rajan can
		
00:03:58 --> 00:04:03
			now kill older young men. Okay, this is prisoners of war. Fine. We have to be honest.
		
00:04:12 --> 00:04:21
			Zachary. So here's talking about divergence. Okay. If there's a non virgin, if it's a non virgin,
you could kill them. It's the prisoners of war. Okay. We know the context is we have to be honest
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:25
			about the text. Then it says what Jim?
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:29
			And Lisa
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:32
			and all of them.
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:39
			Just basically the young girls. Okay, this is the word child marriage comes in. Yes. Jimmy.
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:41
			krishnaraja.
		
00:04:45 --> 00:04:51
			Yeah. Oh, take them for yourself. Okay. No, this is the hajis.
		
00:04:52 --> 00:04:59
			From this Hadith, the scholars have said okay, let's be straightforward. The scholars have said yes,
child marriage.
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:00
			Okay,
		
00:05:02 --> 00:05:08
			let's be okay. This sound kind of sharp No, a certain kind of tone is okay, so what so is this what
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:15
			I'm saying? I'm saying to you is what I'm saying to you. What's the problem with this hadith?
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:20
			What's the problem? As a Christian? How'd you how'd you answer this?
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:25
			Yes. My question is, yeah, show me why.
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:27
			No, this is
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:30
			this is what I'm telling you.
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:36
			Excuse me, sir. You're selling me. Your presupposition is that she has to be honest.
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:40
			I'm saying giving you I'm giving you I'm giving you
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:44
			I'm giving you are fine. I'm giving you.
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:49
			I'm giving you I'm giving you a hadith that says she doesn't have to have to be.
		
00:05:50 --> 00:06:03
			Show me. I've just said every woman. That number and the verse just told you no, no. No, you can say
anyone can say, what's the problem with it? What's the problem with this?
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:07
			I've told you now.
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:11
			It's a book.
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:19
			The name of the person who's the rating daddy. Suppose my
		
00:06:20 --> 00:06:24
			cola fell and I said now? Yes.
		
00:06:25 --> 00:06:27
			Rajan in colusa. criminal.
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:30
			He says, Now you can
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:40
			you can kill the men. Yes, the men and the woman basically that are not virgin, but the young ones.
You can keep them for yourself, the young woman.
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:45
			So what do you say about that?
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:50
			Not say,
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:52
			so don't come to the
		
00:06:55 --> 00:07:07
			fact that you went to the Bible to actually back up your claim. Okay. Okay. Thank you very much. Why
did the ladies and gentlemen, everyone was shocked when I was saying these words. This is no hard if
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:10
			this is no hard if
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:32
			this is no hard if it's a hard if meaning is a spoken word. I say that most of know Enron. You saw
the son of Imran Moto, and he was inaugurated authentically, he wouldn't say this. He said now go
into the towns and kill every woman and every man and woman. But as for the young girls, keep them
for yourself. Now, so you started off?
		
00:07:34 --> 00:07:39
			No, Daniel, sorry. So this is the crux of the arguments. This is the crux of the argument.
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:57
			This is the crux of the numbers, assets. outcome, meaning the numbers Book of Numbers, chapter 31,
verse 18. Now let me tell you something, ladies and gentlemen, he agreed with me in the beginning of
this conversation, that marriage to children is wrong.
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:01
			In his very Bible.
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:13
			It says this is Arabic. By the way, if you look at the Arabic translation of the Bible, it's very
clear.
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:22
			Every woman every girl, young girl that has not known a man, young Go ahead. Okay. Look at the new
Jerome
		
00:08:23 --> 00:08:32
			Jerome translation of the Bible, your interpretation of the bible says specifically this is talking
about pre pubescent and that you can take them as slaves.
		
00:08:33 --> 00:08:36
			No, no, don't say that. Check it. Oh, yes. Show me.
		
00:08:40 --> 00:08:53
			The book with me. I can only give you references my friend. What is the references mutual biblical
translation. And they said that this clearly talks about slavery. That's point one. No, no, no.
Excuse me.
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:55
			Hebrew.
		
00:08:58 --> 00:09:01
			No, no, sir. Please hold on. Hold on.
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:24
			Ladies and gentlemen. Daniel, Daniel. Okay. Okay, fine. We'll go to l tell Moodle finished l
Philistine, the Talmudic The Talmud, the Palestinian Talmud, Palestinian Talmud says the same thing.
This is talking about slaves. And this is talking about young girls prepubescent and you can take
them as slaves.
		
00:09:25 --> 00:09:27
			So why did God Why does
		
00:09:30 --> 00:09:30
			he
		
00:09:31 --> 00:09:31
			know?
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:39
			Okay, let me
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:44
			translate in English because I remember
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:50
			it says, no.
		
00:09:53 --> 00:09:54
			No, no.
		
00:09:57 --> 00:09:59
			No, it says kill older men. Yes.
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:09
			No, I says I know chapter 31. Just 18 of numbers. And now kill all the men. Yes. And kill all the
women
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:24
			that have that are basically not virgin, non virgin, non virgin. And the girls are virgin, that the
young girls that are virgins, then take them for yourselves as slaves. Yes. And
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:30
			you can get the Jewish man over there to help you. Now, let me tell you the Jewish world as well.
The Jewish world.
		
00:10:33 --> 00:10:40
			I apologize, Daniel, go ahead, sir. So you do check the Bible. No, no, because you said in the
beginning, you said in the beginning
		
00:10:45 --> 00:10:51
			the boys and kill every woman who has slept with a man, let's say for yourself, every girl who has
never slept with a man?
		
00:10:52 --> 00:10:53
			Yeah, no, hold on.
		
00:10:54 --> 00:10:55
			Hold on.
		
00:10:56 --> 00:10:59
			Daniel, Daniel, please. Now you don't know Hebrew language do.
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:04
			Okay, so what does the word like? I mean, okay. You don't know. Let me teach you.
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:24
			Something else that I missed for them? Yeah. Now look, what we're saying here, this word is used in
this verse. The word used in the Hebrew means young go. You agree? Because that's how they
translated. That's how Pisa Pisa, what we're saying. I know you're on the I on the back foot here. I
know.
		
00:11:28 --> 00:11:28
			No, sir.
		
00:11:31 --> 00:11:35
			I ask you a question. Because everybody, can you please? Can you please?
		
00:11:37 --> 00:12:08
			Okay, fine. I'll answer that for you. But let me just tell you something again. In the beginning of
this conversation, sir, we have some premises. We had some premises, we said, Do you accept that
child having sexual * with children is wrong? prepubescent, she said, Yes, I accept that.
Then I said to you, if a scripture has within it, that you can have sexual * with
children. Is that scripture wrong? You said yes. Then I quote it to you verses in the Bible. I made
it misinterpret.
		
00:12:09 --> 00:12:10
			Excuse me, you missed your
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:22
			choice. Then I quoted you verses from the Bible, which give Chris sanction. By the way wrong. Hold
on. Excuse me. I thought I gave you references.
		
00:12:23 --> 00:12:35
			And the Talmud that shows you that this means slavery, and this means young girls. Now you have not
rejected the Bible. Therefore I believe I believe you're intellectually dishonest, I believe.
		
00:12:38 --> 00:12:39
			Okay.
		
00:12:42 --> 00:12:44
			Slaves? No, I'm talking about
		
00:12:45 --> 00:12:48
			the Talmud, which is a Jewish reference.
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:59
			So if I was to show you, if I were to show you Will you accept it? Okay, we'll examine I saw you
want me to give you the exact reference.
		
00:13:02 --> 00:13:03
			Okay, but can you answer
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:09
			one thing? First things first, no, first thing is
		
00:13:11 --> 00:13:16
			reference. So let's do one thing. What was my original? No, okay, fine. But that's,
		
00:13:17 --> 00:13:18
			excuse me.
		
00:13:19 --> 00:13:26
			Question had a presupposition, your presupposition, you don't accept it for yourself. So why don't
you want me to accept it for myself?
		
00:13:28 --> 00:14:08
			Forget it. You in your Bible, have it. So if you're saying this wrong, you must say your Bible is
wrong. Okay. I agree. Well, hold on, hold on, hold on being consistent, but you're wrong. Okay. Let
me tell you, Shane Cohen, who is the literary literature professor of Hebrew literature and
philosophy in the department of Near Eastern languages, civilizations of Harvard University,
explains that for yourself, is clearly telling Moses and soldiers that they can use female sexually.
Okay, that's Shane Cohan, chapter eight, page 255 256. And the name of the book is the beginning of
Jewishness, and they're well done. And the process University of California, Berkeley, Los Angeles,
		
00:14:08 --> 00:14:10
			chapter eight. Is that good enough reference or no?
		
00:14:12 --> 00:14:13
			good reference. Okay.
		
00:14:14 --> 00:14:15
			Hold on. Let me give you some more references.
		
00:14:17 --> 00:14:21
			References let's just do one thing at a time. So because you said you wanted references, so I'm
giving you a
		
00:14:22 --> 00:14:50
			rabbi Simone yohai. Yes, in the beginning of Jewishness says the same thing except a 255 256. The
Talmud of the land of Israel, also known as a Palestinian Talmud, mentions how the earliest ancient
of soldiers interpreted 3118 to mean that the females could be a captive slave girls. Ah, Simon says
the requirement in that age of virginity occur within the sanctity of his room.
		
00:14:52 --> 00:14:54
			Okay. This is also mentioned
		
00:14:56 --> 00:14:59
			what the Bible says okay, now what we're saying okay.
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:01
			So you don't want to know
		
00:15:08 --> 00:15:09
			when you've done
		
00:15:10 --> 00:15:11
			what you've done.
		
00:15:12 --> 00:15:16
			What you have done is really in front of everyone humiliated yourself. Yes.
		
00:15:18 --> 00:15:21
			And the reason why I asked you Daniel, please show me when Daniel
		
00:15:22 --> 00:15:34
			Yes. slaves. Yes. Pre pubescent girls, oh, the Bible is your Daniel Daniel. Daniel. Daniel Bible.
No, no, no, no, no, no. By the way.
		
00:15:35 --> 00:15:37
			Now your point is this.
		
00:15:38 --> 00:16:11
			The Bible is the Old Testament and the New Testament agreed or disagreed, agreed. The Bible, the Old
Testament, actually listen to this, according to the Christian claim, not only was Jesus of the Old
Testament, no, no, no, I'm speaking like this. Not only was the Jesus of the old test, the Jesus
Testament, the author of the Bible, why? Because Jews of the Old Testament because it could be
argued that this was abrogated. Yeah. If we want to disregard Matthew chapter 15, verse 17, as
meaning affirm, fulfill whatever you want to call it, fine. abrogated. That was about it.
		
00:16:14 --> 00:16:14
			All right.
		
00:16:17 --> 00:16:17
			For those guys
		
00:16:20 --> 00:16:21
			saying even if you want to say yes,
		
00:16:23 --> 00:16:35
			that's fine. So even if you say that Jesus meant, fulfill, meaning that he doesn't, we don't need to
basically abide by the Old Testament laws. Even if the argument was put forward, we would still Yes,
or excuse me, sir.
		
00:16:37 --> 00:16:42
			We will still say we will still say that listen, they also have the Old Testament was Jesus agreed
or disagreed?
		
00:16:43 --> 00:16:56
			was the author of the Old Testament Jesus or not? Doesn't matter. It does matter. It doesn't matter,
sir. Moses, Elijah, we follow Jesus. Yes. Once Jesus came in and you test Okay, I fulfilled the law
say love you, Daniel.
		
00:16:57 --> 00:16:59
			Daniel, Daniel, please.
		
00:17:06 --> 00:17:08
			Let me just ask you a question is
		
00:17:10 --> 00:17:12
			Daniel, Daniel, Daniel, please, please.
		
00:17:17 --> 00:17:18
			Let me speak.
		
00:17:25 --> 00:17:45
			damage is done. Now. damage is done. Daniel, I'm gonna ask you a question. Is it correct for me to
assume that the God of the Old Testament was Jesus because you say that the Father, Son and the Holy
Spirit are one? No, no, I'll tell you why. I say yeah, what is my that's my presupposition.
		
00:17:47 --> 00:17:49
			A presupposition is an assumption. What I'm saying is
		
00:17:54 --> 00:18:10
			why I say that is because I've been told by theologians and Christians, that actually the Old
Testament does mention the Trinity. And so much as that. It's no, I'm not denying that. I'm just No,
no, no, no, no. Let me, let me just let me get.
		
00:18:11 --> 00:18:13
			Alright, so I've been told by theologians
		
00:18:14 --> 00:18:15
			Daniel,
		
00:18:17 --> 00:18:24
			Daniel, Daniel, I've been told, I've been told that the collective unity of the Trinity was also the
Old Testament of the heavens and the earth.
		
00:18:26 --> 00:18:36
			So that means that means to say both, or excuse me, that means Excuse me, excuse me. Excuse me, sir.
Okay, my point is, that means to say that Jesus is the author of the Old Testament.
		
00:18:37 --> 00:18:44
			That point is now when Jesus is telling you to go and take slave girls. Yes, yes. Yes, yes.
		
00:18:46 --> 00:18:49
			Yes, yes. Yes. He's also both.
		
00:18:51 --> 00:18:53
			Because he's a Christian. He's gone. He's gone.
		
00:18:57 --> 00:18:59
			What did he say? Wait
		
00:19:01 --> 00:19:07
			a minute. What did he say to me? What what he said to me? So you know, he was conceding? Yeah. Okay.
I'm happy with this. Yeah, you know what this word means?
		
00:19:09 --> 00:19:27
			Okay, I'm happy with this. I'm really happy now. So here we've come to the same conclusion as you
determine the conclusions is as follows. Number one, this man agrees in the beginning of the
discussion that we have to be intellectually coherent, and we have to not apply double standards. He
agreed to those promises, even though those promises don't need to exist. Number two, we said that
		
00:19:29 --> 00:19:37
			number two, number two, he agreed, he agreed that he believes child marriage is wrong. I said, I
believe in that you believe in child marriage.
		
00:19:48 --> 00:19:49
			He believed he says
		
00:19:52 --> 00:19:53
			What is that? What is it
		
00:19:55 --> 00:20:00
			360 536
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:11
			65 365 365 65 Okay, okay, let me get let me come to you. Okay. Let me summarize. Let me summarize.
		
00:20:13 --> 00:20:27
			Hold on. I'm saying very clearly now hold on. I know this because believe me, people are gonna take
either one of two, what's the word of someone who understands at least the basics of Islam or your
word? And believe me, they're gonna go for me anyways. We as Muslims don't believe in sexual
* with people.
		
00:20:35 --> 00:20:39
			Okay, why don't you show the independent article? There's an independent article recently.
		
00:20:40 --> 00:20:47
			An independent article. There's an independent 200,000 child. Sexual *. Okay, fine.
		
00:20:59 --> 00:21:03
			you've agreed that child having sexual * with children is wrong. Yes in your Bible.