Jamal Zarabozo – Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 7
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of informing people about their actions during a panel of the Hades prison and the Hades' reputation. They stress the need for caution and caution in the use of specific narratives, as well as the importance of knowing the principles and principles of a narrator in relation to their actions. They also touch on the importance of learning about certain people and their conditions and the need for people to have good memory and understanding what they say. The speakers stress the importance of identifying and addressing potential mistakes and finding out who was alive.
AI: Summary ©
First of all I want to
I want to
point out, but I wasn't
you're dealing with
when you inform someone, you have to inform someone. And you were talking about books that you heard through some
books that you actually heard,
has only applied in the case
of books.
In other words, if you've heard his book, or if you received the book through his agenda, you will not use it. And that was only to be used. The books you've heard,
I think less than any way you've written the book, you received the book, you may transmit it through lenses, not
only books that you receive, you are only edited to receive through some ads, you may make an
advertisement.
What were we discussing last time when we stopped?
Since from my economics, we were discussing the Hades prison, or checking your petty.
And as we said, last time,
we want to take a vote.
Now during the time of the during the panel, where we gave some examples, where like, we'll go through almost an idea, we're checking to make sure that the Edit were being narrated properly.
And we said this is a type of
ideas.
This is a type of general that is because
proficiency.
As we'll discuss, maybe next time, all of the Sahaba are considered either
added
in the Quran that pleases Oh of them. So what we have in that early generation,
we have the time of the Sahaba, basically checking to make sure that the Hadees are being transmitted without any
reality whether the narrator is being honest or not.
As I said about numbers and about
sorry, he said, I thought you had not dealt your honesty, but I want to make sure that people are careful when they transmit it. So during those early generations, or during the famines, the hub of basically the concern was to make sure that people are passing on the
proper
roads without making mistakes when they when they transmitted.
And we pointed out that the hub themselves were also very careful in that.
They would perspire when they're eating from a narrating it. And they would do their best to make sure that they their head is exactly the way that they heard it from the from the process.
The fact if we look at the first 100 years or so
let's say the first he is from the from the family that hit Europe,
up until the time of
up until the time of 50, after the injury.
There was still a large number of Sahaba alive.
So if for example, you want to
learn how
are you going to go to during that time
you have a choice between going to Harvard, or you have a choice between going to other people who did not meet the profit center, but maybe they heard it from so
we're going to go
there
This period, most people would go directly to the Sahaba and take it from the from the Sahaba.
So there wasn't really much room during the same for other people to be narrating.
So during this time, most of the people who are passing out Hadees they are by the Quran as I said, we've discussed next time, and also the bonuses, bonuses and
the bonuses he has confirmed that he from what we know about them.
And in fact, during this time, there's only four narratives.
There
are only four narrators who
have been questioned,
and Nicole's integrity and ability to narrate.
And even these four some of them are not
one of them his name is the how to
write the names on the board.
Die since he's so famous episode on a deck
I don't know maybe a different person.
How do you know it's
not necessary for him to be
pointing out to us before we can
get the story about him. He is one of the major submarine
you know what I mean by major? He's one of them.
Yeah.
Okay, major domain just means that you met lots of stuff.
But even in this case, by the way the Sharpie and add even in the genie. They rejected it.
And they even call them liar.
shabby, isn't too good names to know.
shopping.
The
people who are a little bit stricter than other people when it comes to
marriage. so shabby in Medina, they call him in fact the liar. But the reason they call him a liar The reason they don't accept this is because he was somewhat of an extreme Shia or pro life.
Therefore they don't sit this heavy. That heavy book called The Reserve
as a long discussion about him about how
he concludes he isn't acceptable never. And in fact, his head it can be found in the books of those that have been measured. And
the only thing they had against him was he was very strong in his share of views. But as we'll see later, this is not enough to say that
this
is one of the scores and had instead of being honest, that for us this is honesty and for him is is better.
She Uh oh, those
are the ones no one is the name of
course it was mother's name at birth.
He died in 67
Do
you believe
that the angel Gabriel, Darius came to him and gave him revelation?
claim? So we believe those
any claim or you believe that or know which one?
That angel came to him and give revelation that.
But you will not find any heavy machinery and he never narrated
me the difference between saying that the angel Gabriel came to me and gave me revelation, and forgetting Hades from the promises.
So the second one I thought I did the first one we concluded next week. Okay, here's
the second one. And
it was someone who was misguided. But at the same time, he did not.
Because someone
mentioned him, and their collections we came in, and he was from this theory, or from those people who have questions during the
interview.
But the important thing for us Yeah, he did. He claimed nearly Edison promises, which he fabricated.
This one Unfortunately, not to
name names on the next one.
One more
people will
read.
He was the companion of it.
I'm not sure what he does if he was a companion of Addie.
And even on the DVD, the same one I mentioned earlier, it was one of the
shock of
one of the teachers
and admin in the handbook. Yeah, isn't it?
And then 100 calls him
What's the score by the name of Joseph, Jen.
I could have I could have written this.
I could have written
a criticize, because that's awesome.
But in fact, this criticism is not.
Because
I was one of those people who was very pro of mine and hated anyone who supported
us from those people was very broadman and hated the followers.
Okay.
But you call those people that have specific names, as many
as his agenda just yet.
Yeah, there's a group of people who are who are extremely supportive of Mother Nature for it.
They are important
because that are just
for their accusation of the people who follow any
political
thread.
You happen to be in everyone's wave.
People who are so broad minded, that they are against it, even almost to it.
So,
again, the lead practice.
So, Adam,
Adam was one of the supporters of it, therefore, for only that reason.
For only that reason I chose a journey.
So far, we've had three sets in the first in the first eight years, and so only four marriages have been
done the three of them so far, we said that harder they said, We said he's actually Okay.
Well, the second one
is pretty
heavy.
Okay, and
the only reason people criticize him or the only one actually isn't Joseph J. And that's because judiciaries, but I will discuss that principle. And
I'm just joking around the 200.
What was the moment that
you started your journey, anyone who's
not?
He doesn't give a reason he just did this one.
But we know that
that's what the short doesn't.
And the last one, the name of
the pants.
And this is also related to
this is, this is one of the people who narrate the
20 hours a week. For those people who say, that is not important
to say that the MacBook is not trustworthy,
sharper, and sharper,
sharper, automatic way to say,
this is not the
handbook.
No, you have to look a little bit closer. Again. Mr. Merrick met him when he was very old, and his memory and he had started to
make what we call the Loch
Ness.
Monster met him when he was very old. There were medical Eddie's as being any incorrect. Is there anything that he corrected? So he said he's not?
Exactly and he is not.
Every narrator necessarily is acceptable all the time, nor is he rejecting it.
There's some people like saddam and his own hate Ah,
this is what medics are. He didn't know his history before he met them. And therefore he concluded from what he saw.
But in fact, he is before that time he wasn't. So all the narratives we have in my first eight years is open question. In fact, all of them except from God
can be considered
acceptable. But
that
wasn't it turns out what other schools that said that he looked at his students and he looked at what
have you.
What about he might
he might have been basing his decision on what the mathematics is?
Yeah, probably. Probably.
was like
because
yeah, oh, yeah. I wasn't
planning to get somebody serious.
Okay, isn't that common? Oh, people that can they get old. They may not have been the oldest
isn't it
Our conclusion as intended use was mostly about the war narrative.
And during these years, the science of checking to make sure that had either been transmitted properly had already started. And those few narratives were questioned. In fact, as we saw, most of them are even.
And even our best in fact, he says
that he was talking like, during this period, or actually, especially the first 50 years, he said, they used to be a time when anyone stands up and
says any Harry's always was turned in, listen to him.
Because we were people who would not make any corrections.
Then he said, whenever when
people started writing every
every domesticated and domesticated Cabral knows when people started following their own desires and going.
One, when people started leaving the, the strict setting of the prophets, I send them in the way of Allah, that's when they really have to start questioning and asking, Who can
looking to see who's never really authentic.
The result of this is that since there was very little to do with the early years of them,
we don't find in that period that many what's been called scholars of Jeff with that view.
They're not that many, because there's no need for them.
But after that day, when, for example, Islam spread into new areas, and people begin to embrace Islam. Some of them were not careful when it came to narrating it, some of them fabricated it potentially,
when we start getting away from the time of the Sahaba, the people who were very carefully narrating it, and move on to other people who were not necessarily that careful, when it came to Nero, then the fact that it becomes much more important because then you have to, or there was the possibility of people making mistakes. So during this period, we have, for example, the
residue, and all four of them, were active in making sure that
these were transmitted properly. And some of this was the real science of general idealism. As what will describe, it really begins to develop after this time, because after this time is one of the weak or rejecting narratives, begin to
question about them.
One thing that we we should keep in mind about the scores is
that this is a science that is very important for the people to be most honored to be most careful about what they are, what they're doing.
And most of the scholars were, were also very careful, for example,
they would not
make just for anyone or say that anyone is unacceptable. Unless it's someone who narrates any
other words, there's many people out there who do not narrate
some of them, live them and teach them and it has no reason to talk about
they don't
talk about last time
and he the science of General Studies is something which is
obligatory, not bad.
But even then the scores of pennies were very careful. Someone doesn't need to be not known to be nearly anything the people who were there any there were certain people they were known. And he that these are the people who are passing on
someone, for example, like a massarotti he's into sort of stuff and he doesn't care about any that some people
then we will not will not say about that.
And he has poor memory or
because there's no reason. And we have to be careful. But
secondly, also it's sufficient to say one thing about a person. You should not say more than that.
For example, a knife knife is a liar sufficient for me to make
to make them a rejected just by saying they have a desire. I don't have to say and he also cheats and volleyball and he does theirs. And then
we just say it wasn't sufficient.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah, sure.
Sure, and it looks something hidden because they they want people to
Know that this person is not there for bad news gets to him they don't.
Also they were very careful even in using nicknames. If someone has a nickname that he doesn't like, then they will not use it.
But this
may not
necessarily
so the scores were very careful even with respect to the, to the to the rulers
and in the schools in general not care about the outcome at all when it came to anything awardwallet
would not
be willing to take bribes and this sort of thing even with respect to their own family, also like an even makini he did not allow people to narrate it from his father
because his father was not
acceptable in there who knows that you're not hearing it from my son because he's a liar
when the when the person started mixing it when he starts getting older, usually his children close the doors and don't allow anybody to come in
it's finished.
Son is from much later than 700
Yeah, the son that he called
he said
he used to memorize the Quran and you get busy with other things
many of us
need
to allow others
to allow us to take
us because he's on the floor
because he forgot everything he knew he wanted to build this was only
a computer
my son used to know the karate things but then he gets in the way.
So first of all, before we talk about who is acceptable as a narrator, we should discuss who what kind of conditions are to be applied for the critic what I mean by critic
number one we'll review his movies
and he's the one who's going to make that his brother
and he there's some there's some people
who collected Danny even books on
a smaller general books on narrators and even the one who collected himself is not
as nice as
he has.
So, you will like
he has a book of weakness earrings, he collected a book of weakness, but the himself is not acceptable.
Therefore, even though his book
is not considered when he narrates about people, so therefore Of course
we must be here.
Okay.
What's up
today?
Yeah, we're trying to say for example, what what are some of the requirements that he should meet themselves? At number one, he himself should be
open because
other people.
For example.
We'll talk about how someone becomes
induction is someone who was was involved
Why is this the case?
Why is it
that there is
he has to know what
to say about them and also he has to understand what other people said about like for example, one of the expressions they use
this expression
but
what does that mean?
Okay let me put it this way let me put it a different way Is this a compliment or an insult
if we say he's like
okay.
So, I have no Arabic language in order to know what to say exactly. And also to understand what other people have said
Okay, what else
Sam Walton
otherwise known
because of you
know, a lot of muscular
help
all get mental illness.
This is
not necessary, but you have to know
what are we talking about it?
Okay, to know what makes the narrator acceptable.
When he doesn't know the site
is not going to be happy.
He said some things
and against know the principles he has no.
Or we'll get to, we'll get to some examples. Okay. For example, someone said I don't accept this narrator because he posts too much and suspicious.
Okay. So the guy is saying this, because it costs too much. Would you say that the one who said that understand these principles and is acceptable as a great
day?
Yes.
That's what I did. For example, the one who says I don't except this one because he talks too much. And the other one talks about someone and he said that she I don't like him because of his father. But if you see his beard and his modesty, you'll notice
an increase in his beard and modesty.
More than zero and his principles are well known. They were established. Like
I mentioned before, less than many of the who was added and who is
and who should we measure for I mentioned last time that he's actually pointed out
what kind of area you should read. They're pointed out
and these goals apply what the Quran says.
So the first are the basic pillars comes from the Quran.
So, we said the kids know, the science of difficulty, what we're seeing, and he has to know what that says about physicists.
And
he also talked about how all this kind of data described
ranges up to
a certain quality. And he didn't just say believe in geogrids, because he actually gave certain qualities that we can look at those qualities and if we find them in people, we know that we should accept
them.
Are you talking about another Africa?
My
God, you know, the principles of
and he should he should be?
To some extent,
a scholar.
He should be a score. Okay. What
was the what are we testing now? Again, testing to see the
other end? Okay, well, that means what?
Okay.
Okay, we don't know what headings are correct and
what isn't? And how are we going to say that
you can say that someone has told us if you know, the headings
before we talk about who's headed, maybe if that's accepted
the basic principles of Java
principles. What I mean
by that is that
not every statement will be necessarily
devices that nice was alive.
Yeah, okay.
Someone may lose the position of being having roll out
later.
If I say for example,
this will not necessarily be destiny. I just because I didn't I, we have to look in more detail.
So there's some basic principles that have to be applied.
We have to describe a person
with this division, no need to go
Oh, no, I'm saying no. If a person, okay, it's about environment critic.
And I've been named as a liar. Doesn't mean every time I say someone is a liar, necessarily.
There's some principles that we have to plug
in you'll understand.
First of all,
the before anyone says
anything about every any narrator, he has studied the history of the narrator.
We cannot say completely but in detail.
For example,
when he was going to take it from anyone
in a different city, he would go first go to that city and live in the city for a while and study the person look at him. Watch.
Then if he plans his care
The character system and so forth, that has taken.
So someone has to be looked at.
in detail, for example,
there's the narrator called Javelin dropping
from
there
awesome.
Danny, one of the, one of the scores that diamonds is a worker,
this would be a different one.
He says about Germany
is that if it were not for the people of Cooper would not have any
money.
And he did not actually study the lever close enough. And he just want to go over, he found him and during many,
many of these, you know, so he says, the person who brought these headings
was studied in greater detail. And he says there's no one who is a greater liar than the other.
So we have to help the study the person in detail, some people are good in certain sizes, but it
wasn't.
As it wasn't for Java,
Cooper,
he brought to them many headaches.
Okay, there are some examples from the time of the pub, that they would use the word caregiver
to mean that this person made a mistake.
Okay, that's probably a
mistake observed immediately.
Some people, for example, are good in history.
But they are not good in
the course of history, take their narrations. But when it comes to headings, they're not
just for someone else.
Sometimes this is the result of anger, or hatred, or jealousy.
Because these people are human beings, so we have to study the game to make sure that there's someone
we're talking about actually hears that for example, if we have like 10 scores, and they all say that
and I come along and say I hit the line.
Before we said, my favorite, we have to study to make sure that my segment is not because of something like anger, or jealousy or hatred.
That's a good word.
First benefit I get from my students.
For example, I'll give you an example. Remember,
anyone here know who
is one of the first people to compile
the biography of the
company
was before
the way have
is considered set up.
Most guys consider him in general except
in the men have called him that just
judging by the response if you call someone to just very clear
or accessible and remember
but one of those reasons is marriage
does not accept
nomadic
position
and he did not show in America
and he did not treat in America
know there
was a study if you read the history of that that
was
up to the
top
either out of anger
or a animatic knows the situation if anyone's ever been inspected has installer
something wrong with that it causes this Yep.
So, we cannot accept this type of job which is not based upon
the state.
Now, the
question is now what about
should we now we take them because of what
you see.
Before
we say human medic, we see that general he is just
a human being and he has some weaknesses.
So, find my mistake for me and
if we reject him as you know, or as
in who we are.
So, what we do is we don't accept the money makes mistakes,
as long as it just wants to so that we could we find in doing this a lot like
Joseph j, all the people who
support the government.
A lot of these scholars say
maybe there
isn't a case like that you have to study as well.
mean even if I'm a critic.
We have to study when we study this case of humanity. We saw
envy or some anger between them and stop.
Okay.
I know you'd like
to get mean someone who is
one of the greatest liars among the
Netherlands. Don't miss it.
Hey
baby
although
this is a brother blind
and we've saved someone's life that means that she is intentionally fabricating and making up for making a change and so,
he might call someone from the team
but he gives you the information that you can check and find out who
was the one was alive just making up stuff was big.
Exactly, exactly the first was that we cannot accept the job which is based on subjective
third, that was the surface that was it that was the second
was yesterday all of the
as much as you can about the
second one is when we take the job which is based on
your anger.
So also we reject the job which is based upon differences in
what we mean by that. Is that suppose someone is the
she was observed between all the last year
morning.
The third one is reject the job which is solely on the basis of hockey.
Hockey, for example, the
sheer
difference between this Yeah, yeah, basically
used to hate. They're talking about those people who support that
will support it perhaps a little bit more than than what that doesn't support.
But they do not curse abubaker
they don't believe
it.
Okay.
So they did it. When they asked him to curse it wasn't, he refused. So they they left.
This is where they get.
So as Helen is, as she is, she has a system of support.
So people like GoDaddy because of this reason, regardless of whether the person is
irresistible.
Anyone who loves the robot can
reject all of the
leadership.
First of all,
we have
many of them more often.
For example,
this is how much later generation but I'm going to give an example from that.
He was
yo no, that'd be one of the famous quotes of history. Biography
he had a tendency to, in writing his books, as a scholar he was writing about was from the era with
a
little bit of us
But if he was
called therapy,
then he had a little bit more, but
he was very obsessed with therapy
a little bit.
But if you go to his book called
The people of the subject matter, he did exactly the same thing only in reverse because he was from China. And he was from China shy make the ad in the biography very long.
Because there's not actually rejecting someone did not reject
the show, I'm just giving an example
of the two weeks and the highest scores against one another.
Unless there's some other evidence
that we have sufficient
against each other.
Why?
Because,
as I said, Unless it's supported by
both because the school pays themselves enough.
Because zupancic
for them,
like what you mentioned last time,
he sees the light coming from the sky.
They're just completely unacceptable to the, to the cause of it. So in general, they had kind of a bias against
not like dispose of hate, because
according to them,
and also the
labor,
the labor
they're not like the people, because this isn't their backplane. And also, they didn't accept anyone who had anything to do with
is a North Africa. That is like ghanians anyone is known to go to a water.
So there was many scholars that used to make the roads.
So they make judgment calls
or some other support for some other evidence, we do not
we do not accept this
evidence to support
and the same data.
Not just because we're sitting alone, doesn't mean we're aiming as far as Hey, stay above anybody else.
Some evidence
also, we don't deserve the death which is based solely or just only two differences
and methods.
So for example, sometimes the
some of the Chevy's was accused of having the the
bike versus camping, and if we studied and we find it, basically because one is from one from another, we don't accept the standard.
And this is related to this. We don't accept the job of anyone or anyone who was not a specialist in this field.
Another scenario, or that he said is not suitable. remember exactly what to use.
So one of the scars is hey says Why don't you assist him and he said that
I saw him urinating while
narrating what
was wrong with it? He said that he disclosed dirty
Did you see him as the view that
he was going to do was in his mind
person I always did not
scholar in general economics
for example, the one who said to me this person talks too much
and we don't accept the job
of someone who is not a specialist in this field. Like I said, if you see this beard and this was the
first
who this because he doesn't know that heavy
but then in general
we reject the job of the scholars who are overly strict
when they disagree with other scholars
there's some there's some scars when it comes to making judgments they're very very tough and if someone makes this one or two mistakes
Have you ever had a teacher like that? You don't need like 90%
some scores are very high in
the slightest blemish
or defect in an area
now these are these calls are useful for one thing
that is if they say someone is
really pleased with
these types of scores
include the Yeah, even
otherwise,
many
of you know this to
Eddie. In every generation, we find a one scholar who was strict and the other one who was less strict.
He found a few mistakes.
For example,
the early generation there was an authority in Charlotte
much stricter than subpoena
after that was Yeah, yeah.
And it
was mustard.
Who was who was
shot
imagine
the next generation we have the ideas in my mind.
What the next generation we have a
third generation. Yeah, yeah. Even mine.
Yeah, it was.
Yeah, it was.
It was considered Danny Martin. We are
considered the greatest Scots
it would have been
was also a very strict
and he was also very nice.
Come on
Kate.
principle here is that we do not accept the job scars
when they disagree with
us.
And we can be sure that
we also talk he says this idea of narrators who are scholars who are very
lacks
now one of the benefits is also
considered young lakhs
what's the benefit of
somebody in
Canada
won't happen, what's the benefit
of those who are very strict and they make for the smallest thing, and they say someone has stepped up, then you just one must be
the one getting the group is
a really
good day.
The microphone
was very strict when he found anyone making a mistake or few mistakes, you would consider them you put them in his book, The weakness
he was very lacks on another point.
And then someone is what they call mature or unknown.
And it just evolved just one person narrating it from him, then he can put it in
both.
And the problem is he wasn't very consistent because sometimes you find the same area
when it comes to people who are unknown,
basically that have been assumed the person is either unless there's some proof that he's not.
And even if he's not known.
Just breathing air is the main areas of other smaller stages.
So when it comes to unknown areas, we don't accept as
and when it comes to narratives are known. We don't necessarily
know
the spear scholars if they disagree with others.
Also the easiest scholars they disagree with others we don't think that they're
good.
Because
not because
if for example, the shop visit someone is
Yeah, that is almost a patient we don't have to look to see what any other scholars
have
in their head and take a look
at themselves.
What that means is if you find the healthcare for someone or
normal sufficiently
General, sincere or extreme, don't really use them.
Okay, so you have to
buy
Can you apply these principles
for example, the
shabby
last night.
So, we have gone on to
the matter.
So, we can go through we
can say which one probably is great
some rules
that
apply under the same rules
as they actually wrote about by using
one of the principles is by the by the weekend.
I know he has never written about
this anywhere where he has written in detail for example.
So, we cannot really see what the principles is, but it says one You said it doesn't resemble any philosophy No, that's one of the principles
know,
we will, we will
but
first of all,
as the mother
mentioned,
someone is well known,
very famous for being being a scholar
and as accepted by all the scholars, then we do not accept
any job for him unless there's some clear proof
for example,
he has a book called
Moscow key
in this book, he has one Narrator And his name is
Ahmed
I didn't want to make this joke so I gave you
in that book he has he has
the reason he has
near the end of life and some people were
most likely Joseph
so once got a name is Mohammed me. Yeah, Mr. Mori.
I know it's not to
say
I'm telling you
what I mentioned earlier,
he wrote a letter to him and
I was
everybody believes that the fraud is created.
So therefore, after the damage has been done visit I refuse to narrate any ideas that they had.
But But we know I'm behind, and he was very well known and his opinions were well known.
And even his opinions on this point.
We cannot be the
voice
for quality because we know
it's not what it means. But because of that reason, because some people
accuse them of something above included his
purpose was to mention those people who are Christian
was the
nothing there's nothing missing from his life if we don't
know what you're getting.
But we know that
the comment is not from him from someone else.
When you say that the people get
angry.
Seems I said, it seems that some people
there's no there's no way that we can explain why
this man wrote this letter about the water when we know it's not true what he wrote
that was from me, was my
Yeah, there would also be
any question about those
Okay, for narrator to be accepted or make that default and what are some of the general
conditions in general now, what are some of the conditions that you must meet?
We talked about who can be the critic, we talked about some of the principles of ideas now let's get to the narrative themselves and talk about some of the
characteristics
are the narrator
and we mentioned Yeah,
okay.
To get into a little more detail, what we mean by
what we mean by
from our point of view, what we mean by this is performance, and what is the best
way from
performance surgery is away from the building.
And also we should have something
good to live.
Except
for
the highest and the highest level,
not everyone who is that we call them.
Principle
of the one we
discussed, the one that we're talking about the row itself, what are some of the characteristics that he was must possess, for others to accept.
Under this one also, we can include a must,
must not violate.
Moreover,
how would you translate?
How would you translate Moreover,
must be a normal period.
Why is that important? Why would we consider that?
principles and moral?
Well, what do you mean by?
What do we mean by value?
Now, it isn't something that changes over time.
It used to be,
obviously not anymore.
One day,
things like this, that if someone is eating while standing or eating in the marketplace,
eating in the marketplace, and during that time, something shows that she doesn't have normal care. But why would that be important? And why would we consider that as
we just opened up?
With this one?
Why is this important? And why should we say the narrator should have no?
What's the relationship between
your
work? What's your relationship between eating in the marketplace and narrating
this
transition for
someone who is in the market?
Okay, so it's not
like eating in the marketplace?
is not
okay.
If you don't have these characters in him, then yeah, he doesn't have
and much more.
And he was very intelligent,
to some extent, and because he is doing things that was the people to blame him for
any shows that there's something that he doesn't have that much modesty in the people that may be also narrating it, you may say things which he feels may not be correct or in order to succeed.
And also, there's something that he This is accepted by all the people and he goes against it.
They go to Berkeley, you'll see many examples.
something suspicious,
but it's not the case that if you seem to something what
I thought it would be
eating in the marketplace one that doesn't mean you're not going to
what is the matter of doing it over and over and showing the turnoff the proper
respect, we have to make sure that the performance is away from automa.
We have
more characters
What about
more detail?
What are some of the things you when we say,
you have good memory inherits from this memory, you have to have good memory,
good handwriting that he can
see him writing like this,
when you write
and what he
is what he wrote and said,
He will relate to and he must marry confidence in his religion. In other words, you must be
you must be known must be known as reliable in this transmitting,
he must comprehend what he transmits, and he must understand that is that he string
must be aware of a pronunciation that may change the meaning of the heavy
must be word, any pronunciation
of any pronunciation that may change the meaning of the head is
just finished the quote person,
it must be capable of transmitting the word forward as he heard it,
not merely transmitting it, according to its meaning, with assistance before obviously, this means to separate from those people who say,
married by me.
Furthermore,
he should have learned that at least by heart, if you were taken from memory,
and you should have memorized the written text of Hades, if you relate it in its written form.
And when he participates with others and reading it from memory, then which they relate must agree
when he released the same thing that other people narrate, it should be agreement, not the always disagreement.
And he must not be within
What's the name of Shapiro.
So, and not just
the
words that he sent me, but also he has to be someone who understands what he heard and understand what he says
we discussed already
the fact that the person decides these two things are involved, we discussed this last time or the time before you must also be Muslim. And we discussed why must also be adult This is
just in the general categories or general characteristics of acceptable marriage.
Moreover,
mentioned already
must be must, must be an adult
to discuss the reasons for those
and as we mentioned last time, he may be
he may be the narrator may be a man or woman.
area may be a man or woman, maybe
as long as these other conditions are met, in fact, many cases the slave days are the best sources of pain.
The
model
one of the people who was the greatest scorer
because he spent most of the time with me, serving Him and living with him. And even after he's finished, because Moeller they still have this relationship.
Like
not liking
the status.
What was your question? Yeah.
Okay.
Look,
if I tell you it
was I heard from somewhere
And you should not change it to another tablet
according to your membership,
according to those other people that we discussed that time if you are a scholar