Jamal Zarabozo – Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 2
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss various topics related to Islam and American policy, including hate and the use of words like "has" in relation to certain topics. They also touch on the origin of the term "has" and the use of it in various context. The speakers discuss the use of " sin" in relation to paperwork and the importance of understanding the physical characteristics of actions in relation to the process of writing. They also mention various topics such as religion, literature, and the difference between "immaterial" and "immaterial" in English. The course on physical characteristics is designed to help people understand the meaning of headings and headaches, and provide evidence for their actions. The speakers also discuss the process of discovering evidence for a football player's actions and how it affects the score, and provide examples of legal theories and their impact on the media.
AI: Summary ©
According to the jurors assume that
the act between
shorthand they cannot see
between words you are looking for
permissive
act between obligatory and permissible and if you do it and if you do it
if you do it with the right intention
if you don't do it
and if you leave it completely that's one thing but if you don't do it some time there's no sin.
So an example of that is what
somebody
Don't be afraid of the
bob okay.
Know how much detail we want to get into this but he mentioned
which is if you perform with me and following this paradigm, you get the reward
forward deserves in
this one is the Alyssa category
Have you read.
So
if you leave those more, is not considered carpool according to
the other one.
Look at a dress for example.
Okay, so as
soon as the budget
if you do not pray as soon as the budget is close to what you put into most of the members, if you do not pray it on Sunday, there's no sense
of like if you missed the one, but if you do it, you'll get
one of
the legal
theorists.
By the way, this is also good. For those of you who go on to lecture about Islam, English teacher,
legal theory
might be the last thing is in your rights.
Or what do we mean by legal theories?
All those people were sending,
which is the next step and this one is
awesome.
What's the definition of hate?
But did you say
did
not object to
Arabic?
What else
are they?
If you read the books,
when they talk about something, such as a source of law,
if you're talking about action, how to great action. So for
that
reason, these people are talking about soon as a source of law. That's why their definition is different.
Because of the source of all too soon, basically saying that the problem is actually
worse.
example of this, just make sure everyone knows if you're talking about
things, it's pretty clear.
pretty clear, but what do we mean by the left?
Give an example.
Okay, why would that be considered a source of law?
Basically, what she said last part is sufficient
for something
and he did not object to it means that that action is okay.
Because if this is something wrong, he must object.
So, for example, the form of prayer
after the event for select among the Sahaba used to go to the pillars of the mosque, and pray to
Him saw them and he did not object.
Therefore, they say that this spraying tool
after the event promoter, as soon as I said it, never did it, but they say it
because he approved
putting any after the Moto and before
but it is part of this
message.
Have you seen
now, from the No, the the Have you seen they also look at the topic from a different point of view? Have you been looking at it as everything that is narrated?
From the
definition?
For those of you who are wondering what we're doing
definition, assume that according to the different
types of Polymer.
And in other words, if you pick up a book, talking about the subjects, they're gonna use the same words, they're gonna use different meanings, you want to make sure we know what we're talking about.
Have you seen other as they looking at a topic from a different point of view?
They're looking at it as
everything that has been narrated from the promises.
So what did they conclude innocent according to their definition?
According to the definition of submitted includes
things, okay.
action
would be either one of
the characteristics, the physical characteristics of the Prophet
include that part of the definition of pseudonym, because remember, they're not talking about
an action, whether it is haraam or mobile or wagyu. They're not talking about the source of all obviously, the physical characteristics of
shorts, doesn't mean
there's no part of law that Muslims should be totally sure.
But they're talking about everything that's been there graded from the process, and so they include physical characteristics.
That's what they're talking about, they look at the center as a source of law.
So therefore, these applies to the distant history.
This book are looking at are using the term soon as the tech of x distance between words.
Okay, anything else?
What do you mean?
Everything that he
said that physical characters
for example, he has to walk at a quick pace. His hair was so long
he was so high his cheeks are such as this color. All these things have been narrated in heavy. Okay. From the point of view, they're all Parkinson
disease is
another that's another that's the next quarter,
next quarter, next quarter.
So in other words, any there are some things which the magazine Colson which the jurists
like what
have you
learned? Actually, that's not
something I need, that mighty thing will say this is this is part of the project. That's how it works as part of the ideas that have been resonated. But from our point of view,
how many ways is the process of having one
let's say nine.
Okay, so those nine why's, and they'll describe it as this is, the sooner the process and
these people was when they say, they must go sooner.
The
point of view
that's what I'm trying to get at the different ways to use the word sin.
From the Mojave team point of view,
right.
noticed the motive is one
person in the room.
From the point of view, they say,
or talk about Heidi's point of view, we say that,
what have you they say
they're using the word differently.
And they're also using the words differently.
For them, they're only concerned with actions which are still valid in the law,
which are not from the specific actions of the processes, which are not even those actions will have been abrogated. But for the sum, that anything that comes from anything, anything that comes from a description of the process, in which he did what he said, what he proved that even his own physical characteristics, it was awesome.
So for this course,
except for today,
in general, we'll be using this definition of
these things, all of these things are captured in the effects of literature and literature is called Have you
saw them Have you seen
their main occupation is studying this literature
and seeing which of this literature is authentic, in which their goal, their goal is to
determine what are the authentic things actions, approval and characteristics?
well enough is what they're saying.
Just
quickly, more
likely,
what do you mean by special
physical characters.
00 is another topic.
The study of the life history of the process. Originally it was the study of
religion and to begin develop more into life.
You
Originally, it wasn't intended, then developed into a study of the entire life of the Prophet.
So this is a study of the Prophet's life from the time he was born and from the time he received revelation until his death is supposed to be chronological.
Now, their source,
the source will be
the words they use headings and try to arrange it in such a way that they reconstruct life in
general, have you seen I'm not that interested in that I mean, as files field of petits itself, they're not interested in starting from the time of revelation until the
gentleman
it was a different topic. Until at the end, maybe we can talk about the differences between the books of
why there's such a big difference.
Okay, what about beer? Which category has come under what?
Okay.
So from the legal theories,
by the way, this is a big topic, whether the action is for you or not.
It is something that the next course we'll discuss. So over here, it comes under physical characteristics. What was the color of his beard? What was the shape of it also comes under his actions, because growing a beard as an action
to shave it.
What it was thing
to leave it, okay. And there's also saying that the province has ordered the Sahaba to
but just the beer itself, we don't consider those things, both here. And here. And you could even say it's, you
know, records
disapproved.
So could fall under
just some terms, I want to turn next in which I'm sure you're all familiar with, just
as mentioned them now.
Every heavy, heavy
was the fact Have you had any reports concerning the profit, so send them the same nexans obsessive football, this physical characteristics? And we may also use the term headiest for reports from the Holland's domain, we'll discuss what's the difference?
But there you have you have two components, which we'll discuss in great detail in this course.
The first component is detecting
I'd appreciate it No one makes jokes about the way I read.
The second one is the chain.
This do I think you're all familiar with these, these two key this? Is the chain of authorities back to the provinces.
And the text is the actual text is that how do you think is the same of the provinces or
statement from the Sahaba describing action or an approval or characteristic of
any questions? So, so far?
Just kind of introductory, I
wasn't even planning on going over
to the new plan.
Did they change?
Any question here? Okay.
We will talk about how these groups interact later. But obviously,
for just before the jurists, let's say for the for the legal theory.
Legal theorists will say that
you'll see that all of these things are combined. Or you may find them in the body of literature.
And they are they've also discussed even though it is really important.
They also discuss what isn't acceptable and what isn't.
And he will also find this in the books.
And he they'll give you the condition, and even talk about the size of the book.
But the point is the serene although they discuss the topic, they do not go to a single
or they do not take individual hobbies and study that Harrison 71 is as authentic enough.
In order to know that you have to go to
these people do not study individual today's interview this heavy,
does the job of the
Japanese both
was to help
them Yanni with what he's actually grading the heavies exactly like
also for these, for these jurists.
Whenever they say something is obligatory, they must have some evidence for it.
Whenever there's five levels, as we said,
some must have
or dislike down here.
Now for each of these, for example,
to say something is harmed, they have to say something, or to say something, and they have to have some Heaven, either from the phone or from the heavies or other tests.
Again, if the evidence is from the Hadees,
according to the saline only authentic, it may be acceptable. So also the football they have to go.
So basically, what they're doing the job of the pyramiding team is just dividing between the authentic and
then in the application. And
so they're divided between authentic and authentic,
in order for the full cost to know what added there to playing with.
So there are there is some relation between. So in other words, it's not the job of what have you seen, or had just to look at it every
day, the problem is that Dylan did something, not his job to say, well, that act is was important.
In order to do that, you have to have training.
So that's not his job. The job is actually just intended to help you and to determine whether it is authentic or not. And also, it's his job to push the tool. And he explains explain the meaning of the headings, the words of the headache, and so forth.
But it's not the job necessarily to make conclusions about whether it was the ruling that we derived from.
Now, of course, many more, have you seen rows of
unqualified examples?
As we're talking about later,
we'll find
some points that he made, especially in the chapter titles, which shows that he's also 14, not just
that's the case with many people.
Especially in the early years.
Nowadays, you find some people who are basically just detained and if they were to go into other areas, they would show their their weakness. And vice versa, by the way, find some footballs sitting in nature. They don't know anything about
us specific names for each
input all Florida.
Shelby
are here.
Over here,
over here in JavaScript
over here now what about these four I just mentioned?
Are they also legal affairs?
So
it was removed Remember me for sure.
No question. That is awesome. So here's the first one who wrote the book about us.
What about
it was before but
just because Jeffrey was the first one to write a book about it. That doesn't mean it didn't exist before him right.
So also, you
You'd have to put up money.
And you'd have to include. Oh, by the way, ah, Vader was Denver over is
also
one of us.
What about
consistency?
Some farms claimed that he was not solid, Some even say he wasn't.
But the things that he was, and if you look at the things he said he shows that he understood what he said.
But admin, especially would be down here
is one of the greatest.
What about the membership? Would he be considered
one time that you know more heavy than I know So, you know, I had them missing to me, but but she was calling have you put
any like we put quotation marks to put him in prison? Or was he amendment?
Do you remember for sure was
my mother used to call him? Mm
hmm.
We're talking about pretty early years.
What does that mean? It
means is one of
them actually means is one of those.
What about that, what would he be considered?
Probably not.
Probably not that
much less than quotation.
Probably not one of the greatest probably could probably not be considered.
And it just to give
some names of more things for all the six collections of Hades and Polly Muslim widow divinity of these people
about legal theorists
even though he's named
Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed Al
Hamad squared
It's been a long
journey also.
There's another one His name is Mr. Hadi Hanafi. Legal theorist.
These people are are more annoying.
They're basically legal.
Well, they're not as strong when it comes to.
Over here in juris, we have
to kind of give you some people who are not as famous.
You
know, we have to be here. Of course, no is awesome.
for them.
He was the fisherman.
Okay.
He didn't read much in this area.
What about
this, what's your proof for that?
And if you read the body, you'll see the different hedging results.
Even even getting down to the Sava, some of them are.
Some of them were constrained in certain areas. Not so much this area.
Every time I say this area
between Ghana there were there were like for example level greater destiny specialist, although he did get put was sometimes also I mean,
although he did his test was something I mean he was also someone who was lucky.
But there was some principle of delay
almost exclusively
others or for many reasons they were more involved in something then they were in investment he had to like have a look at almost
any there were more
so he said nine o'clock