Jamal Zarabozo – Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 11

Jamal Zarabozo
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The conversation covers various narratives and their importance in various topics, including the origin of various people and their origins. There is confusion over the origin of certain narratives and the origin of certain people. The speakers discuss various books and their publication, as well as the importance of knowing headaches and rules for them. They also touch on the use of headaches as a means of asserting someone and the potential consequences of not being a Muslim person. The conversation covers various topics related to headaches, including leg injuries or body injury, and the importance of finding the right people to use in the media.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:05 --> 00:00:08
			Welcome to the 11th lecture
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:13
			from robot,
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:23
			the topic, smarter gel, which is an AMA checkers book from pages 151 to 213, since we're getting
very far behind,
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:32
			will, will not really be going over those. And unfortunately in English we don't really have
reference on.
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:36
			This basically discusses
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:46
			different types of narrators and who they are. Basically, it's identifying, identifying who the
people are. So if you read those sections,
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:53
			you should for example, read about who are the Sahaba what's the definition of a Sahabi? According
to them handwritten
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:57
			who are the most important Sahabi?
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:04
			Well, have you considered either These are some of the important things should get from there.
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:14
			You should know that there is no hobby and no TV by the name of Abrahim
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:19
			was important. Why is information like this important?
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:33
			The Senate ends with someone by the name of after him, you know that you're missing at least two
narratives between him and the purposes
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:38
			or
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:49
			some of the things they cover for example, is
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:54
			a category called a service or a lead.
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:02
			And this is also an important topic because it can lead to some confusion.
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:05
			I will get to it
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:09
			later lead to some confusion.
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:13
			What is this in English?
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:16
			I'm going to define it okay.
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:21
			The former the former in Latin the letter for
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:26
			so for example, we have Mr. Malik.
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:30
			We look to see what's the
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:33
			the depth?
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:39
			What's the earliest
		
00:02:41 --> 00:02:45
			of the people who narrated from him? What's the earliest date of death?
		
00:02:46 --> 00:02:53
			That's called a seven. Okay, so for example, in the case of a medic in Amazon, he was older than
him.
		
00:02:55 --> 00:03:06
			And he was full of Hades, but although he's older than him, he still took some heat from him and
medic. This is not uncommon for older people take it from young people. So as though he was the
first one today
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:13
			was the earliest to die from those people who narrated from him a medic. And he died in 124.
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:25
			And then we look to see the death of the oldest person who died I mean of the last person, the last
person who died who narrated from him Amharic
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:31
			and in this case is someone by the name of Hamelin Ismail
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:36
			and he died in the year 259.
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:39
			When you smile,
		
00:03:44 --> 00:03:44
			and this is
		
00:03:49 --> 00:03:51
			the reason this is important.
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:56
			They said that removes the possible confusion because as you see the
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:08
			math class between the dates of his death, and the date of his death is 135 years.
		
00:04:10 --> 00:04:18
			So someone if you were just to look and see the zaharie narrative from medic and made narrated from
medic, you might get the impression
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:20
			that there's something wrong.
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:29
			Because there's, I mean, it's strange to find one person and one who narrated from him from the
beginning to the end of the difference 135 years.
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:33
			So they used to study these things to make sure or
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:38
			just to show that in fact, 135 years is not a strange amount.
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:51
			And so if anyone were to look at it, you would not be surprised by one narrator near informatik
dying that early. And the other one dying that place will vary has a book on this topic.
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:54
			One of the one of the
		
00:04:56 --> 00:04:59
			largest spends 150 years between
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:03
			Seven letter form and the letter as
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:11
			I just did
		
00:05:12 --> 00:05:14
			this is a seven this one
		
00:05:19 --> 00:05:20
			stands out what
		
00:05:21 --> 00:05:23
			have you How do you explain it?
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:28
			Was was the Chevy Volt much older than him? But he took it from him
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:34
			Yes 55 years when he told me he wanted to
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:42
			give it to you just what I'm saying and to avoid that kind of confusion doesn't mean that there is
		
00:05:43 --> 00:05:49
			when when nazare narrated from him when when is that is it my medic was about 34
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:56
			medic live to about one Oh
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:05
			yeah, we're taking the death of the person the first one who died and the last one who did
		
00:06:08 --> 00:06:11
			also you have to know they also studied the strange names
		
00:06:13 --> 00:06:20
			and the reason you have studied the strange names is because if you find someone like me For
example, I'm sure if I wrote this on the board
		
00:06:23 --> 00:06:25
			so it would correct me to say that's not right it shouldn't be
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:28
			or this name
		
00:06:35 --> 00:06:45
			yep know the strange names to know that the one who's saying the name is not making mistakes Okay,
as the name JB was the name Okay, they're not common names you'll find them in
		
00:06:50 --> 00:06:52
			shouldn't be the same as having
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:56
			a shower.
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:04
			This is when the topic of smarter yet which we're going through just very quickly
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:23
			including that also those people who have names which give a false impression of their ancestry or a
false impression of something about them. For example, there was someone by the name of a woman so
didn't
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:27
			have read on the board is from the Sahaba.
		
00:07:29 --> 00:07:32
			But if you hear that name was the first impression you will get
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:47
			and this means that he is from the people who participate in but but he has the name of a certain
boundary because he lives it further for a while. He lives in that area.
		
00:07:49 --> 00:07:56
			Okay, so if you hear Harry's from him narrating something about the Battle of weather, you might say
yeah, he was there His name is
		
00:07:59 --> 00:07:59
			Marcus
		
00:08:03 --> 00:08:03
			Mark
		
00:08:05 --> 00:08:08
			nine thing that he did not does not wear his coat.
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:12
			But also, for example, we talked about Buhari
		
00:08:14 --> 00:08:22
			how many administer male Bihari jersey. The last name also confuses some people. How does he get the
name of the jersey?
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:47
			Yeah, Danny his the his grandfather became Muslim through someone from the travel jacket. Or that
time if you become Muslim at the hand of someone you take on that person's name. So his family was
known as the trophy after that.
		
00:08:56 --> 00:08:56
			Hey,
		
00:08:58 --> 00:08:59
			what's the
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:02
			smile?
		
00:09:04 --> 00:09:08
			doula I can't get it to break as new technology.
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:11
			Maybe it's the mailman or something.
		
00:09:20 --> 00:09:30
			There's also this there's another section about those narrators who are step up but who have no
strong change coming from them.
		
00:09:31 --> 00:09:37
			So for example, the one who the one who the process in the nickname is El amin
		
00:09:38 --> 00:09:39
			is just just shy.
		
00:09:50 --> 00:09:52
			The process and him call me
		
00:09:58 --> 00:10:00
			Danny although his element
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:05
			And obviously his stepfather is no any strong chain to avoid
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:08
			so we have not authenticated from
		
00:10:10 --> 00:10:12
			those who came up to him
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:19
			so they also have this category that people who are a step up but there are no authentic change from
them so
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:24
			historical accident
		
00:10:33 --> 00:10:36
			related from him from an authentic chain
		
00:10:37 --> 00:10:39
			there are some from an opposition
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:43
			because of the chain after
		
00:10:45 --> 00:10:53
			330 in the morning
		
00:10:57 --> 00:10:57
			but
		
00:11:00 --> 00:11:04
			I wasn't going to I was going to they wouldn't hear what they said.
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:20
			But in order to go even quicker make up some more time.
		
00:11:23 --> 00:11:25
			He told me you read everything
		
00:11:26 --> 00:11:30
			these are names of books that I didn't bother to, to try to translate them
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:48
			Oh, just look at the letter
		
00:11:50 --> 00:11:51
			like me.
		
00:11:54 --> 00:12:04
			So this these information about narrator's and any where they lived and where they died, and so
forth, these are contained in different books of
		
00:12:06 --> 00:12:10
			biographies. So here I give you a list of some of the more famous books
		
00:12:12 --> 00:12:17
			most of these are published and available nowadays. On the second page is a couple that are
		
00:12:18 --> 00:12:18
			published.
		
00:12:20 --> 00:12:24
			There's books inshallah, when we get to heirs will correct them
		
00:12:25 --> 00:12:27
			as books that just discuss the Sahaba
		
00:12:28 --> 00:12:29
			who are the Sahaba
		
00:12:31 --> 00:12:36
			give some background about the history and who narrated from them.
		
00:12:37 --> 00:12:40
			And Elisa even had the third book there
		
00:12:42 --> 00:12:46
			even talks about who some people call Sahaba. But in fact, they are not to have
		
00:12:47 --> 00:12:51
			he has three sections. The third section are those people who are actually not
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:53
			their mistake.
		
00:13:02 --> 00:13:03
			The
		
00:13:10 --> 00:13:32
			next is books of double costs are books that several cost what's the what they mean by that is they
take each generation The books are not arranged in alphabetical order. But they take each generation
from the Sahaba and then the divine and then service arraign. So you find them all in the same
section. Back to the author of the book. One of the most famous of those is to Cobra by
		
00:13:35 --> 00:13:36
			the line
		
00:13:39 --> 00:13:41
			to live inside stem as you save in sad died in 230.
		
00:13:44 --> 00:13:48
			Yeah, also discuss and who were their students and sometimes they're
		
00:13:50 --> 00:13:58
			not the best one books on the conference just have to have awareness to have on some, where did they
live? Who were their students and so forth?
		
00:14:00 --> 00:14:04
			Yeah, these are all any biographical books, the biographical information.
		
00:14:11 --> 00:14:12
			I've learned
		
00:14:16 --> 00:14:21
			not necessarily not in this first two categories. I mean, nothing the books.
		
00:14:23 --> 00:14:37
			The next one is there's books of any discussing narrators in general all different types of
narrators. And two examples I gave her severe Buhari and Elijah with a deal by him whenever he has.
		
00:14:39 --> 00:14:43
			He has three books one is to edit his career. One is that he has a rare
		
00:14:45 --> 00:14:47
			large Small and Medium
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:51
			increase different books to say
		
00:14:57 --> 00:14:57
			no, he
		
00:14:59 --> 00:14:59
			pretty much he
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:03
			Recorded everyone that she had heard of, even if you didn't have any specific information about
		
00:15:05 --> 00:15:06
			where the others know.
		
00:15:08 --> 00:15:11
			Then there's also books of just trustworthy narrators, but
		
00:15:13 --> 00:15:16
			largely been even sharing.
		
00:15:25 --> 00:15:27
			But then there's books of just weak.
		
00:15:29 --> 00:15:29
			Man.
		
00:15:37 --> 00:15:38
			He died in
		
00:15:39 --> 00:15:40
			three 385
		
00:15:42 --> 00:15:44
			not talking about someone nowadays.
		
00:15:45 --> 00:15:46
			Also books a week
		
00:15:47 --> 00:16:04
			narrated the most important of those two probably are the most important three of those camel
pharyngeal by even Abby has been published. And I think eight or nine large volumes is then led to
death by the hubby and Mr. Amazon
		
00:16:10 --> 00:16:13
			synonyms and antonyms both as a hook
		
00:16:15 --> 00:16:16
			even had the last word
		
00:16:22 --> 00:16:22
			that
		
00:16:25 --> 00:16:28
			must have been tagged by the time I reached or someone Junaid calls again.
		
00:16:31 --> 00:16:42
			But then there's also collections of narratives from specific work like elbow Party and the Muslim
and also most of the medic
		
00:16:46 --> 00:16:48
			televisie. That's correct. That's correct. Yes.
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:53
			Please, like Edmund would you be we have to be
		
00:16:55 --> 00:16:59
			the most famous, the most used books are probably the last category.
		
00:17:00 --> 00:17:05
			And those are books of narrators from the famous six books, six books being
		
00:17:06 --> 00:17:10
			Bukhari Muslim and say, let's put him in the web and measure what
		
00:17:15 --> 00:17:17
			he says he says, you
		
00:17:18 --> 00:17:20
			know, since he wouldn't
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:21
			be
		
00:17:22 --> 00:17:26
			the first of those was by omakr. So he did in 600, I forgot to put this
		
00:17:27 --> 00:17:28
			as command
		
00:17:29 --> 00:17:39
			was this book needed some revision, and he included lots of information about the narratives, the
headaches they recorded and so forth. So this was mizzi
		
00:17:41 --> 00:17:50
			made some Museum The next one, it made some corrections to it and deleted some things. And that's
known as the evil command.
		
00:17:52 --> 00:17:55
			And then from Mrs. books to two other books were were made.
		
00:17:57 --> 00:17:59
			One is that he beats me by Debbie
		
00:18:03 --> 00:18:06
			in which he improved the book a little bit.
		
00:18:08 --> 00:18:10
			Yeah, is the one that
		
00:18:12 --> 00:18:19
			what did he do he has also been made in mock tests of the form and two books one is called as cash
by Adobe also.
		
00:18:20 --> 00:18:22
			And the other one, the pedals there will
		
00:18:25 --> 00:18:25
			be
		
00:18:27 --> 00:18:29
			at the north end.
		
00:18:37 --> 00:19:02
			And then on the other side, also, even hazard also went to the Lizzie's book, he added some
narrators, he included some, he took out all the information which is not relevant to general ideas.
In other words, Missy has lost information and some of it is not really needed. So exclude all that
unnecessary stuff. He added some narratives that were not in his book, and he calls it the heavy
heavy
		
00:19:04 --> 00:19:04
			deadlift
		
00:19:06 --> 00:19:08
			and then even had your summarize his own book
		
00:19:11 --> 00:19:12
			and a book called The previous century,
		
00:19:14 --> 00:19:20
			which is the smallest of all those books you will find. He criticized the hobbies in cash if
		
00:19:21 --> 00:19:22
			he said it is like
		
00:19:24 --> 00:19:32
			can you just add one for all the narratives but his book for free was much less has much less
information as I have his books? Why brought
		
00:19:35 --> 00:19:36
			to see what kind of
		
00:19:37 --> 00:19:46
			what the books look like some of the books and compare some of them. I brought example from David
Talib and Derek revere gelaterias.
		
00:19:48 --> 00:19:53
			For two of the same narrators, I underlined their names I did not make
		
00:19:55 --> 00:19:56
			16 or whatever copies of those.
		
00:19:59 --> 00:19:59
			He has a
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:17
			Because the LL will not have a rigid but they're in a very there's not all the books Oh, there's
many many many books, but these are some of the most important books. Yeah the book by Moxie and by
mizzi these two have not been published they are still makuta
		
00:20:18 --> 00:20:20
			they are the books have been published and
		
00:20:25 --> 00:20:30
			you could think of what each one of us take away from the German for the man we can get our PhD
		
00:20:38 --> 00:20:39
			we
		
00:20:50 --> 00:20:50
			should be the opposite
		
00:20:52 --> 00:20:54
			when you listen to the
		
00:20:57 --> 00:21:06
			So, as I said we went through those that topic quickly Any questions about that? And it wouldn't say
enough to actually have questions about it
		
00:21:11 --> 00:21:21
			in his book three, but then we when you when you look at this, you will find for example, that He
gives the number after the name Mina Femina
		
00:21:25 --> 00:21:32
			yeah this is this cup of coffee it from the from the Sahaba to been to the debate and so forth is
saying which which
		
00:21:34 --> 00:21:44
			generation the person came from and also afterwards you will find initials after the each person's
name for example, after job geography
		
00:21:46 --> 00:21:48
			you will find del whatever we'll call
		
00:21:50 --> 00:21:52
			What do you think those mean? This is the three of attending
		
00:21:55 --> 00:21:55
			then
		
00:22:01 --> 00:22:09
			after the names after each name when you look at this you're going to find some letters who's up
here you find Dell was that local
		
00:22:16 --> 00:22:20
			coffee By the way, some people when they look at them, I think it means myself canale
		
00:22:21 --> 00:22:24
			don't make them mistakes, stands for really
		
00:22:25 --> 00:22:27
			anyone knows because we
		
00:22:32 --> 00:22:34
			even measure it we measure.
		
00:22:37 --> 00:22:42
			So, we should compare the different books and how they deal with the same
		
00:22:50 --> 00:22:50
			tirmidhi
		
00:22:56 --> 00:22:56
			Muslim
		
00:23:02 --> 00:23:04
			want you listening from the six books
		
00:23:09 --> 00:23:09
			as a book
		
00:23:12 --> 00:23:12
			I just did not put it
		
00:23:15 --> 00:23:20
			this is the sixth book is narrated from Korean Muslim
		
00:23:22 --> 00:23:26
			Bukhari Muslim widowed etc maybe even measure and NSA
		
00:23:27 --> 00:23:28
			quality Muslim
		
00:23:31 --> 00:23:32
			according
		
00:23:34 --> 00:23:36
			This is how I write them in my notes.
		
00:23:38 --> 00:23:38
			Muslim
		
00:23:40 --> 00:23:40
			I would
		
00:23:43 --> 00:23:46
			imagine that many would
		
00:23:47 --> 00:23:48
			say
		
00:23:52 --> 00:23:53
			also uncertainty
		
00:23:55 --> 00:24:01
			even had to include in many narrators from books other books that these people included
		
00:24:06 --> 00:24:23
			that you see what's happened is not to see the first one there he decided to make like an
encyclopedia biographers claim so he put it he decided to take some important books and make take
all the narratives from those books. He decided on these six books, okay. So by this
		
00:24:24 --> 00:24:42
			freak of history, by his decision to do that, these six books became known as standard works, okay.
They're called the has that doesn't mean that they're all authentic. But because of what democracy
did they are grouped together and they became the most important six books. Why?
		
00:24:44 --> 00:24:46
			Because too big, probably
		
00:24:48 --> 00:24:50
			was the first book and no
		
00:24:52 --> 00:24:53
			more no, no.
		
00:24:55 --> 00:24:59
			In this case, johari was the first Muslim was the second
		
00:25:01 --> 00:25:06
			tirmidhi an essay and all of them are students of inquiry and Muslim.
		
00:25:08 --> 00:25:09
			And Muslim is every student
		
00:25:11 --> 00:25:14
			and even measures the last of these.
		
00:25:17 --> 00:25:21
			So we're talking about people from the same generation or
		
00:25:25 --> 00:25:26
			Muslim is a
		
00:25:28 --> 00:25:30
			Muslim, Muslim is
		
00:25:34 --> 00:25:35
			a Muslim.
		
00:25:41 --> 00:25:43
			Any questions about this? Many people?
		
00:25:45 --> 00:25:48
			Many people say that it's the first time I ever heard
		
00:25:50 --> 00:25:51
			I think getting hanifa
		
00:25:54 --> 00:25:54
			I never heard
		
00:25:55 --> 00:25:56
			more of these people.
		
00:26:01 --> 00:26:06
			The first time ever, if you can show me any book, anyone who says this, even for rich.
		
00:26:10 --> 00:26:18
			Now, what's it what kind of debt are you making? His book is too big of his book. If you just take
the narratives from his book that will be just as big as this book.
		
00:26:22 --> 00:26:23
			I'm talking about the Muslims
		
00:26:24 --> 00:26:28
			who just take the narratives of the Muslim Ummah and be as big as it
		
00:26:31 --> 00:26:31
			is.
		
00:26:34 --> 00:26:38
			It is actually in another book by forget the name of the author.
		
00:26:39 --> 00:26:44
			The there's a book of just the narratives from Muslim men, but it's not
		
00:26:46 --> 00:26:48
			something I have, but it's not that same
		
00:26:49 --> 00:26:50
			monster agenda he
		
00:26:55 --> 00:26:55
			was
		
00:26:57 --> 00:27:01
			discussing in general. But let's finally move on to authentic heavy
		
00:27:03 --> 00:27:07
			what are the conditions that authentic Hades must meet now?
		
00:27:09 --> 00:27:14
			Without is a student of Buhari and as tirmidhi and Muslim
		
00:27:18 --> 00:27:26
			tirmidhi NSA and widowed they're all pretty much from the same generation the same time they all
studied with a hurry and also wouldn't
		
00:27:28 --> 00:27:33
			imagine a little bit later. I think he may have met them Buhari, but he did not really study under
him.
		
00:27:35 --> 00:27:37
			Yeah, he studied under them.
		
00:27:42 --> 00:27:49
			So now after all these chapters that we studied so far, there's five conditions for a headache to be
		
00:27:50 --> 00:27:51
			considered a hate.
		
00:28:05 --> 00:28:06
			keep them awake.
		
00:28:10 --> 00:28:12
			By now, all you should know this
		
00:28:15 --> 00:28:20
			just from logical progression of what we're doing so far. So focus, for example, with respect to the
narrator's
		
00:28:22 --> 00:28:26
			all of the narratives must be auditable. Okay,
		
00:28:31 --> 00:28:38
			not 90% of the narratives, but all of the narratives in the chain have to be either rolled up,
right? We discussed why are
		
00:28:42 --> 00:28:45
			the five conditions for headaches to Vista, hey,
		
00:28:52 --> 00:28:53
			going to
		
00:28:55 --> 00:28:56
			Mojave mohideen.
		
00:29:05 --> 00:29:15
			This this, if he's talking about he had about a particular head is that different from seeing what's
there the condition? No, because for example, in the general idea we talked about
		
00:29:17 --> 00:29:31
			the narrator's that for one score, he might be thought the other score will put them a little bit
lower. So for one score higher it will be so high for the other one it will be but as for what are
the conditions these are pretty much accepted by all elements. What else
		
00:29:33 --> 00:29:34
			chain has to be chain?
		
00:29:36 --> 00:29:37
			What was the chain?
		
00:29:39 --> 00:29:40
			Okay, unbroken chain.
		
00:29:46 --> 00:29:50
			It was all pretty clear from what we've studied. so far.
		
00:29:51 --> 00:29:53
			The third, the fourth condition
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:04
			Okay, cannot be shared. Okay, no, no
		
00:30:18 --> 00:30:19
			they all come late and they complain
		
00:30:22 --> 00:30:22
			about the class
		
00:30:24 --> 00:30:25
			and the last one
		
00:30:32 --> 00:30:35
			also grammar and there will be
		
00:30:37 --> 00:30:38
			no, no ill
		
00:30:39 --> 00:30:45
			will be also as we talked about for there's grammatical and then something wrong with
		
00:31:00 --> 00:31:13
			this one is clear and one chain has been broken otherwise if there's someone missing from the chain
we don't know who he is we cannot say whether he's acceptable or not. Number two we discussed in
detail hopefully it's clear to everyone number three. What about number four?
		
00:31:14 --> 00:31:15
			What do we mean by this?
		
00:31:20 --> 00:31:23
			Okay, cannot contradict anything stronger?
		
00:31:31 --> 00:31:33
			Well, this refers to both this method
		
00:31:37 --> 00:31:37
			and the method
		
00:31:41 --> 00:31:47
			for example, the Quran the Hadith contradicts the Quran to be considered shared.
		
00:31:48 --> 00:31:56
			If the headache is the what's the go ahead we'll discuss this and it contradicts another headache,
which is what what it is because
		
00:31:58 --> 00:32:01
			if the headache is narrated by people who are any
		
00:32:02 --> 00:32:14
			borderline acceptable, unacceptable and the bottom of the first handout I gave you in the top of the
second handout, and it contradicts what the top narrators narrated, it would be considered shared
		
00:32:15 --> 00:32:18
			and notice it refers to both this net and the
		
00:32:19 --> 00:32:21
			most does not end the text of the heading.
		
00:32:28 --> 00:32:29
			contest is not
		
00:32:31 --> 00:32:33
			valid or invalid
		
00:32:36 --> 00:32:43
			it's not for example, suppose you have chains well known for example to pass through episode
		
00:32:45 --> 00:32:49
			and then some other people well everyone knows episode this week. Okay.
		
00:32:51 --> 00:32:53
			So what else narrates the same Hades
		
00:32:54 --> 00:33:04
			and he This is how all the scores are headed and there is someone else the exact same had it was the
exact same chain only who puts that inside is
		
00:33:05 --> 00:33:06
			something
		
00:33:08 --> 00:33:09
			we don't know about.
		
00:33:13 --> 00:33:27
			And in this case, this will be considered shed because everyone owes and this person who narrates it
like this is any of this is not from the top category so everyone's narrating in this way and he's
contradicting them so this would be considered shed
		
00:33:31 --> 00:33:43
			yeah we only when we look at it we study we have to conclude that he made a mistake so this would be
considered it's considered a shed in the internet because the way he's narrating it is contradicting
the way the mind
		
00:33:45 --> 00:33:52
			then this is this narration is shared because the way he narrates it contradicts the way the
scholars narrative
		
00:33:55 --> 00:33:56
			week okay,
		
00:33:57 --> 00:34:00
			if we if we narrow it to headed this way, let's say is this a Hey,
		
00:34:02 --> 00:34:03
			if it was actually this way because he's
		
00:34:05 --> 00:34:06
			a busy man man, forget sad
		
00:34:08 --> 00:34:09
			okay.
		
00:34:10 --> 00:34:17
			But this is not a hadith because it's shed In other words, the scores have had eaten their rates are
headed this way meaning this is wrong.
		
00:34:19 --> 00:34:24
			So this will be considered shed contradicts the way the score was and anything and everything.
		
00:34:28 --> 00:34:32
			Yeah, this is the way that the people who are experts in headings and narrating and
		
00:34:34 --> 00:34:52
			this is the way someone who is a little bit weak is narrating it this way. And all the evidence
shows that he's narrating it the wrong way. So in other words, the way he's narrating is
contradicting the way the scholars and narrating so we reject it and we call it shed. So there can
be no shoot for the headache, a headache can be nothing like this.
		
00:34:58 --> 00:34:59
			The reason is that in this case
		
00:35:00 --> 00:35:01
			The heavy this week
		
00:35:03 --> 00:35:09
			we we narrated incorrectly looks ahead, but this year because it contradicts
		
00:35:11 --> 00:35:16
			the case we'll also in the bottom of the chain, others hover
		
00:35:18 --> 00:35:19
			instead of
		
00:35:21 --> 00:35:28
			if you have one Sahaba here and another Sahaba there and it may not affect the status of the head of
both the hover
		
00:35:30 --> 00:35:35
			obviously and most of them are known to narrate it may not affect the status because this shirt
		
00:35:37 --> 00:35:38
			most of them
		
00:35:39 --> 00:35:58
			yeah you would say this. For example, if the narrated from is actually one of the heads of Aveda and
someone narrated from Alabama to be considered Of course, yes this is yeah this narration is
actually narrated by a waiter but then they'll say well Annie the Hadith is still so Hazel just
narrowly incorrectly
		
00:36:00 --> 00:36:01
			claimed job
		
00:36:09 --> 00:36:09
			shadow
		
00:36:11 --> 00:36:26
			and depends not just the number of change but sometimes it's if you have one weak narrator going
against you American loading in the way these people narrative people that category to reconsider
share just one against three
		
00:36:28 --> 00:36:33
			but if it's Jani Ury we're ahead and it goes against me with the weapon for sure it's gonna be shit.
		
00:36:41 --> 00:36:42
			I already explained this
		
00:36:45 --> 00:36:46
			and explained
		
00:36:48 --> 00:36:50
			the gear with Islam in
		
00:36:52 --> 00:36:53
			double question is different.
		
00:36:58 --> 00:37:01
			But the last the last condition
		
00:37:02 --> 00:37:10
			there should be no ln the head is what we mean by Allah. This case, by the way, what they mean is
the hidden
		
00:37:16 --> 00:37:22
			hidden hidden defects. Everyone in this one again also can be in this net or them
		
00:37:31 --> 00:37:33
			in the either in this net or in the middle
		
00:37:35 --> 00:37:37
			is the but
		
00:37:42 --> 00:37:44
			but what they mean by L
		
00:37:47 --> 00:38:04
			is this the heavy looks the hair and everything looks perfect and headed. Now you could argue that
shirt by the way or in the shed is a special case of Ella but anyway they differentiate between two
we look at the headings, everything looks sound, everything looks fine.
		
00:38:05 --> 00:38:07
			But if you studied closer
		
00:38:08 --> 00:38:20
			and bring together all the changes in the headings, you will find that there's been a mistake made.
And that mistake is is a hidden defect in other words is not obvious to anyone, but only to the
scores of Haiti.
		
00:38:22 --> 00:38:31
			For example, there's the statements of Abdullah bin Massoud that says that whatever the Muslims see
as good than Allah sees it as good
		
00:38:32 --> 00:38:37
			whatever the Muslim see is better than Allah sees it does that. So you have the chain
		
00:38:48 --> 00:38:49
			statements of Abdullah bin Masood.
		
00:38:50 --> 00:38:53
			So you have the chain. Have you narrated
		
00:38:57 --> 00:38:58
			like the sound that makes
		
00:39:00 --> 00:39:00
			going back
		
00:39:06 --> 00:39:07
			Muslims that makes
		
00:39:08 --> 00:39:23
			you have the chain going back to the love and misses so someone when he narrows his head if he makes
a small mistake instead of stopping I love the luck he just maybe his tongue just continues. He says
Abdullah an individual Okay, from
		
00:39:25 --> 00:39:26
			the from the public.
		
00:39:28 --> 00:39:38
			Okay, he made a small mistake he just added a small mistake is big, but it's a small mistake. He
just added the profits name at the end.
		
00:39:39 --> 00:39:43
			So if we study this already, so now it's the heads of the provinces and the way
		
00:39:44 --> 00:39:58
			we study this head is by itself We'll see. Okay, everyone is Adam Baba. The chain, then broken back
up. Elon Musk Massoud said was the hobby. There is many headaches from the promises and so the chain
is unbroken back to the processing
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:03
			So, if we just look at it, everything looks fine.
		
00:40:04 --> 00:40:06
			But if we
		
00:40:07 --> 00:40:13
			study this narration and study how other people narrated the head, you will find that a mistake was
made.
		
00:40:17 --> 00:40:18
			Because the hidden mistake is not obvious.
		
00:40:20 --> 00:40:22
			And this mistake because and
		
00:40:24 --> 00:40:28
			so for me to be so hey, there can be no hidden defect, right?
		
00:40:29 --> 00:40:29
			So
		
00:40:30 --> 00:40:31
			this should be
		
00:40:33 --> 00:40:36
			it should stop right here because it's the same in a bundle, it's not a statement of profit
		
00:40:39 --> 00:40:43
			by taking all the different ways people narrated it and studying it,
		
00:40:44 --> 00:40:48
			and trying to spot to see if someone made a mistake by making it a metaphor back to the process.
		
00:40:53 --> 00:41:00
			Yeah, other any if we study we find that, in fact, that is the statement from Abdullah not from the
process.
		
00:41:02 --> 00:41:04
			Okay, so something like that they call it
		
00:41:08 --> 00:41:08
			they
		
00:41:10 --> 00:41:12
			wonderful, wonderful. But he
		
00:41:21 --> 00:41:22
			was,
		
00:41:26 --> 00:41:39
			in other words, days modifies the statement of the vote, this element is not corrected this week.
But as a statement of Adelman Massoud, it is correct. So you find this term a lot or this. They say
this a lot. They've been referred to as Mr.
		
00:41:45 --> 00:41:49
			Murphy, I mean, back to the province, that means back to the Sahaba.
		
00:41:52 --> 00:41:54
			That's what those two terms mean.
		
00:41:57 --> 00:42:00
			Another example of that, for example, in the text
		
00:42:01 --> 00:42:05
			is someone I don't remember who written here somewhere.
		
00:42:06 --> 00:42:27
			He narrated that the prophets I seldom said that someone gives so much that his right hand does not
know how much his left hand is giving any talking about the people who will be in the shade of Allah
subhanaw taala it said one of those is the person who gives so much that his right hand does not
know how much his left hand is given.
		
00:42:31 --> 00:42:46
			So the enterprise nowadays I think, is clear. But does the mistake that he made listen closely the
right switch hands on like a magician, the right hand does not know how much the left hand gives.
		
00:42:49 --> 00:42:53
			And even in the Arabic language actually the right 10 is the one that gives us maybe
		
00:42:55 --> 00:42:56
			that is a mistake.
		
00:42:59 --> 00:43:02
			That he said the head is nervous.
		
00:43:07 --> 00:43:12
			So anyway, we studied that headings we find that someone made a mistake and that
		
00:43:14 --> 00:43:25
			there was some scholars who were experts in ela like and even the Medina at Milliman Hanban Buhari
and daughter, Courtney, Mr. Muslim, it is the most difficult thing
		
00:43:26 --> 00:43:27
			in Oman Have you
		
00:43:34 --> 00:43:36
			any questions about the five conditions
		
00:43:51 --> 00:43:51
			when they established
		
00:43:54 --> 00:43:58
			love to actually state these are the mocassin I think actually
		
00:44:00 --> 00:44:05
			shortly one of the ceram or the first I guess, because
		
00:44:08 --> 00:44:09
			but not
		
00:44:10 --> 00:44:11
			because McCarthy
		
00:44:16 --> 00:44:16
			the
		
00:44:19 --> 00:44:19
			fun
		
00:44:23 --> 00:44:26
			that not the text of the head is they will
		
00:44:27 --> 00:44:30
			actually be former Casa de Shreya. They used to call Muslim.
		
00:44:31 --> 00:44:37
			They will not apply a hadith in certain circumstances because the cost of the Sharia but doesn't
mean they will reject the Hadith.
		
00:44:39 --> 00:44:40
			The difference between the two? Yeah.
		
00:44:47 --> 00:44:52
			No, all they have these two principles shared or in. But the same thing.
		
00:44:56 --> 00:44:59
			I said you don't criticize with this specific circle.
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:05
			says you may not apply to the credit based on this principle but next fall anyway
		
00:45:10 --> 00:45:13
			as opposed to the other questions you've been asking this is important
		
00:45:17 --> 00:45:18
			enough to get anything
		
00:45:21 --> 00:45:22
			to be somebody
		
00:45:25 --> 00:45:28
			with a headache or headache from stronger narratives though they love you
		
00:45:32 --> 00:45:42
			The next point that was going to get to some people said that Yan is visiting my sister pain they
said this is all over howdy they just look to this night if there's not a spine the neck of the head
is
		
00:45:44 --> 00:45:57
			and this is not correct as you see two of the conditions for this to be a refer directly to the
method in other words, they had to study the method also to make sure it's not shared to make sure
there's no end
		
00:46:00 --> 00:46:01
			because how do we apply this how do you
		
00:46:05 --> 00:46:06
			know next fall
		
00:46:10 --> 00:46:11
			in love
		
00:46:13 --> 00:46:15
			you had any
		
00:46:16 --> 00:46:17
			as I said next fall
		
00:46:18 --> 00:46:20
			get through the headache part first and then we can
		
00:46:27 --> 00:46:35
			proceed. Yes. Okay, you can see that they work and the great part is probably one of the best fuqaha
		
00:46:38 --> 00:46:38
			of his time
		
00:46:41 --> 00:46:48
			to read this book has helped Buhari and you see how he gets evidence from different parties and
you'll see that his focus
		
00:47:01 --> 00:47:05
			but let's take an example of headache and let's see if this headache is authentic or not.
		
00:47:08 --> 00:47:08
			Dorothy
		
00:47:11 --> 00:47:12
			we have
		
00:47:13 --> 00:47:15
			we have in the handout
		
00:47:16 --> 00:47:17
			column Dorothy
		
00:47:25 --> 00:47:26
			bother jiofi okay
		
00:47:31 --> 00:47:34
			I'm not going to read I'm just going to say you may write it down college GOP.
		
00:47:36 --> 00:47:37
			GOP said
		
00:47:41 --> 00:47:49
			I'm delayed and uses the word use of narrative to us and definitely remember that term from long
time ago
		
00:47:51 --> 00:47:53
			caller brought in a medic
		
00:48:00 --> 00:48:01
			medic informed
		
00:48:03 --> 00:48:03
			and
		
00:48:05 --> 00:48:06
			and even she had
		
00:48:07 --> 00:48:09
			well as we said as a generic term.
		
00:48:11 --> 00:48:12
			From image you have
		
00:48:15 --> 00:48:18
			m Hamad M and jubair even Martin
		
00:48:21 --> 00:48:22
			the range before
		
00:48:29 --> 00:48:30
			populated to the restaurant.
		
00:48:33 --> 00:48:33
			And IV
		
00:48:36 --> 00:48:37
			from his father
		
00:48:39 --> 00:48:39
			who said
		
00:48:41 --> 00:48:44
			Who said I heard the prophets the rest of the Hadith is named
		
00:48:46 --> 00:48:50
			as the Prophet recite surah Torre and certain Mogra
		
00:48:52 --> 00:48:56
			or that was the first time that in an instant My heart
		
00:49:00 --> 00:49:01
			is not ready
		
00:49:04 --> 00:49:05
			but the logic
		
00:49:10 --> 00:49:10
			now
		
00:49:17 --> 00:49:18
			V
		
00:49:22 --> 00:49:30
			and V any this policy I heard the promises and then we said sort of broader sort of model and that
was the first time he met into my heart
		
00:49:31 --> 00:49:32
			of
		
00:49:38 --> 00:49:40
			the five conditions doesn't meet the five condition
		
00:49:42 --> 00:49:47
			Yes, this heavies this heavy they just gave the meet the post condition. First conditions first
condition.
		
00:49:49 --> 00:49:51
			The first edition was the first condition
		
00:49:57 --> 00:49:58
			why
		
00:50:00 --> 00:50:02
			So between jobs we have books
		
00:50:03 --> 00:50:05
			between a jersey and
		
00:50:07 --> 00:50:09
			the lead the news is the chain broken or not
		
00:50:13 --> 00:50:15
			okay let's start with two and three then
		
00:50:17 --> 00:50:21
			202 and three together we say this the newest has to be
		
00:50:33 --> 00:50:33
			one page
		
00:50:36 --> 00:50:37
			okay
		
00:50:38 --> 00:50:40
			jubair What about him? Is he
		
00:50:44 --> 00:50:45
			smart Martin Martin
		
00:50:50 --> 00:50:50
			What about him?
		
00:50:52 --> 00:50:52
			You don't know him
		
00:50:55 --> 00:50:57
			book Do we have to go to
		
00:50:59 --> 00:51:01
			lithography some users
		
00:51:02 --> 00:51:05
			will find this is a hobby
		
00:51:06 --> 00:51:07
			What about Mohammed even Jabarin
		
00:51:11 --> 00:51:13
			is also so happy
		
00:51:14 --> 00:51:21
			there's so many calls in between people from the same travel costs and everything from each other.
It was to have it in everything from each other.
		
00:51:23 --> 00:51:23
			When the
		
00:51:26 --> 00:51:28
			close close enough, the fact that I remember that word.
		
00:51:31 --> 00:51:33
			Yeah, I mean, can we just worry about the lead?
		
00:51:35 --> 00:51:36
			Whatever.
		
00:51:41 --> 00:51:43
			Oh, did I skip as an employee? I said
		
00:51:45 --> 00:51:48
			oh, it means you have somebody Oh, who does my next question.
		
00:51:50 --> 00:51:51
			Okay, what about the zoning
		
00:51:54 --> 00:52:00
			everyone knows the zoning is from the top if you have the handouts from in Manhattan is from the top
the top top.
		
00:52:02 --> 00:52:03
			But what about the nomadic
		
00:52:09 --> 00:52:12
			questions that haven't been handled but when it comes to Malik
		
00:52:14 --> 00:52:15
			or affinity I'm sorry.
		
00:52:17 --> 00:52:17
			But what
		
00:52:21 --> 00:52:26
			we have done is we have started by one person. Anyone supports this idea?
		
00:52:27 --> 00:52:29
			They both support as well.
		
00:52:31 --> 00:52:33
			Okay. And he was discussing drove
		
00:52:38 --> 00:52:41
			me to come back to him. They've been now back to the first
		
00:52:43 --> 00:52:44
			let's assume for now, that is the
		
00:52:45 --> 00:52:46
			synchronized
		
00:52:47 --> 00:52:49
			back to the first condition
		
00:52:50 --> 00:52:51
			is the state unbroken
		
00:52:55 --> 00:53:01
			I mean, who knows? We no way the students in this class know whether this chain is broken or not.
		
00:53:03 --> 00:53:06
			How Okay, I feel jiofi acid For now, let's assume he is
		
00:53:09 --> 00:53:16
			a GOP speaker and he said he had definitely been useless if someone is Stefan has had death Now,
what does that mean?
		
00:53:18 --> 00:53:22
			It means he earned it directly from the person three lectures four lectures
		
00:53:25 --> 00:53:27
			going from stupid
		
00:53:32 --> 00:53:34
			means he heard it directly from him.
		
00:53:36 --> 00:53:41
			If I say had destiny now if that means I heard it directly from that, did you miss better
		
00:53:45 --> 00:53:47
			than useless bit about an emetic?
		
00:53:49 --> 00:53:54
			Name thing you heard it directly from Alexa those two links. unbroken
		
00:53:55 --> 00:53:58
			marriage medic did on image you have a zoning.
		
00:54:01 --> 00:54:04
			How do we deal with that? Did we discuss this before? That?
		
00:54:06 --> 00:54:07
			Whenever
		
00:54:11 --> 00:54:13
			we deal with that, what's the problem with an
		
00:54:17 --> 00:54:18
			okay,
		
00:54:19 --> 00:54:20
			the problem was that
		
00:54:22 --> 00:54:23
			someone could make the leap.
		
00:54:33 --> 00:54:36
			What's the definition of delete in this case? What are we talking about?
		
00:54:46 --> 00:54:48
			This issue is not what we mean right here.
		
00:54:53 --> 00:54:59
			At least means that number one has two conditions number one, I will give you any what that looks
like.
		
00:55:01 --> 00:55:03
			A narrate Hadees
		
00:55:04 --> 00:55:05
			from the
		
00:55:08 --> 00:55:10
			A narrated from V.
		
00:55:12 --> 00:55:14
			In general, in other words a is a student to be
		
00:55:19 --> 00:55:22
			a is a student of B as I should have put it that way instead of inherits from be
		
00:55:24 --> 00:55:26
			a student
		
00:55:28 --> 00:55:29
			okay.
		
00:55:36 --> 00:55:37
			A and B.
		
00:55:39 --> 00:55:41
			voice from the
		
00:55:46 --> 00:55:47
			head is number 251
		
00:55:54 --> 00:55:57
			number 251 y'all know heading number 251
		
00:55:59 --> 00:56:04
			Pacific heading heading number 251 A did not hear from the
		
00:56:12 --> 00:56:17
			A did not hear hedis number 251 from V but he heard it from si
		
00:56:22 --> 00:56:23
			si obviously is also students a b
		
00:56:26 --> 00:56:26
			c.
		
00:56:28 --> 00:56:29
			k c.
		
00:56:32 --> 00:56:33
			Everyone following so far?
		
00:56:35 --> 00:56:35
			Eva
		
00:56:37 --> 00:56:46
			sees another student from B okay. A did not hear hedis number 251 from B but he heard it from C on
the authority of B
		
00:56:48 --> 00:56:51
			because he missed one class yeah this is whether he was sleeping
		
00:56:52 --> 00:56:52
			okay
		
00:56:54 --> 00:56:56
			now here's the important part when A
		
00:56:58 --> 00:57:01
			is no he heard it from be on the sword I mean hearing it from
		
00:57:03 --> 00:57:07
			that's how he heard the head is from C and V doesn't work.
		
00:57:13 --> 00:57:21
			everyone follows the word the heavy from C from presidency and one person she narrated the headache
he said had definitely be for example
		
00:57:22 --> 00:57:23
			everyone following
		
00:57:24 --> 00:57:29
			so you get that now when a narrator
		
00:57:34 --> 00:57:36
			narrator heading number 251
		
00:57:38 --> 00:57:40
			dropping see from this net
		
00:57:43 --> 00:57:45
			and saying I be
		
00:57:51 --> 00:57:52
			the authority
		
00:57:54 --> 00:57:59
			Yes, yes. Because if it's not a student of being a and b it's not the
		
00:58:03 --> 00:58:17
			these are the conditions this is what this is that your students have someone you did not hear the
headache from him directly you heard it from someone else and you say I'm that person this is what
at least is that at least listener
		
00:58:19 --> 00:58:20
			but
		
00:58:22 --> 00:58:28
			the way that the problem is okay when you do this is you're leaving someone out of the chain
		
00:58:29 --> 00:58:39
			that person may have made a mistake and they didn't had it he may not have noticed the same way
beanery throughout the study see dramas you don't know see you don't know who he is because he left
them out.
		
00:58:45 --> 00:58:45
			So we can
		
00:58:46 --> 00:58:48
			pay but there will not be
		
00:58:49 --> 00:58:50
			okay
		
00:58:52 --> 00:58:55
			clear any fair okay this is called the list
		
00:59:00 --> 00:59:00
			of
		
00:59:01 --> 00:59:04
			students a B then the gene is just broken but not that this
		
00:59:06 --> 00:59:08
			is not prominent. So it no longer
		
00:59:10 --> 00:59:15
			Yeah, because the same will be broken. But here we have a more difficult from because a actually
heard it from me.
		
00:59:16 --> 00:59:19
			Now what do we do with people who committed these?
		
00:59:20 --> 00:59:22
			Who do this kind of thing.
		
00:59:23 --> 00:59:25
			If they are stubborn In other words, if they are not liars,
		
00:59:27 --> 00:59:28
			they're idealistic.
		
00:59:34 --> 00:59:36
			For rich school, they don't have much Chuck in this thing.
		
00:59:44 --> 00:59:48
			Now what do we do with people like this? People who committed Lee
		
00:59:49 --> 00:59:52
			people commit to this if they use the word and
		
00:59:54 --> 00:59:55
			we don't accept the Hadees
		
00:59:58 --> 00:59:59
			unless it's proven that they heard it
		
01:00:02 --> 01:00:03
			Let me let me write it.
		
01:00:10 --> 01:00:11
			Yeah, no.
		
01:00:14 --> 01:00:15
			Those who admittedly.
		
01:00:17 --> 01:00:18
			Okay,
		
01:00:19 --> 01:00:20
			number one,
		
01:00:21 --> 01:00:22
			if they use
		
01:00:24 --> 01:00:25
			any they submit the list. But
		
01:00:27 --> 01:00:28
			if they use on
		
01:00:32 --> 01:00:32
			reject,
		
01:00:40 --> 01:00:45
			they use the word rejected what they should do if
		
01:00:47 --> 01:00:48
			they use adesina.
		
01:00:51 --> 01:00:53
			If they use vadhana.
		
01:00:56 --> 01:00:59
			They just state that he heard it directly, because remember, he's not a liar.
		
01:01:01 --> 01:01:11
			That's the point. So in other words, if he says had definitely brought enough, or had definitely
brought a need, this means he heard it directly from the person. So there's no fear of him making,
at least in this case.
		
01:01:13 --> 01:01:15
			So you're still protesting?
		
01:01:31 --> 01:01:33
			Do you should listen to
		
01:01:36 --> 01:01:40
			it? Yeah, you could argue that you should mention the See that's why this is known as to bliss.
		
01:01:41 --> 01:01:43
			That's why we're careful with narrative. Because
		
01:01:46 --> 01:01:46
			Yeah.
		
01:01:53 --> 01:01:55
			We're talking about the people we're talking about.
		
01:02:01 --> 01:02:03
			If you notice the
		
01:02:04 --> 01:02:05
			discussion of
		
01:02:06 --> 01:02:13
			Java and Java, many people they said Yanni, if you didn't have destiny, or CMS to run into, then he
is
		
01:02:14 --> 01:02:15
			acceptable.
		
01:02:16 --> 01:02:16
			But
		
01:02:18 --> 01:02:23
			this is what we do with people who commit to these if they use the word on we reject the headache.
		
01:02:29 --> 01:02:33
			Can he be around for the mother this and at the same time, forget several jokes.
		
01:02:35 --> 01:02:36
			But
		
01:02:38 --> 01:02:44
			now, if they use these terms, then we accept the heavy. That's what we do when we find the term i'm
		
01:02:47 --> 01:02:48
			used by Moodle.
		
01:02:50 --> 01:02:53
			But if we know that the narrator did not commit to this,
		
01:02:54 --> 01:02:55
			then we don't have to worry about this.
		
01:02:57 --> 01:03:07
			If we know that the narrator did not commit the literalist or something marketing hated, because the
only dropping someone from the chain is difficult to test the rest of us heavy.
		
01:03:09 --> 01:03:11
			Yeah, sure, that causes the brother of line
		
01:03:12 --> 01:03:20
			shuttler Yeah, here's the name. No, call the brother of line has in mind that I prefer to commit
Zina than to commit
		
01:03:26 --> 01:03:26
			that
		
01:03:29 --> 01:03:38
			he prefers to be killed for committing sin and then to commit to this, because in many cases, you're
dealing with the deen itself. When he goes in it, just you so Fanny
		
01:03:43 --> 01:03:55
			Miller, we're talking about the people who commit to this, what do we do with their heads? If they
use okay, but if someone as I said, No, not to commit to at least,
		
01:03:56 --> 01:04:02
			and use the word iron from someone who is a student from then that means that the change
		
01:04:04 --> 01:04:05
			is one of the conditions of service.
		
01:04:08 --> 01:04:09
			You should know the
		
01:04:13 --> 01:04:23
			journey as I talked about before, they in general, they will not accept narrations from people who
are not careful, but don't know for example, what had destiny means or samento they will know.
		
01:04:29 --> 01:04:38
			We will we will talk about later when we talk about what we had is what are some of the reasons for
committing to this. So for example, number c or person C, excuse me.
		
01:04:40 --> 01:04:44
			Person C, in A's opinion system,
		
01:04:46 --> 01:04:47
			but other people don't like
		
01:04:48 --> 01:04:56
			okay, so he knows that if you mentioned C's name, they're not going to accept that. So he dropped C
from this and in his opinion is taco there's nothing wrong with
		
01:04:58 --> 01:04:59
			that first one. Anyone?
		
01:05:00 --> 01:05:03
			Reason then might cause someone to commit this kind of
		
01:05:04 --> 01:05:10
			thing. So but if narrator's know not to commit currently, and he's narrating from someone that he
was a student of,
		
01:05:11 --> 01:05:20
			then any of the change that means the chain is unbroken at that point. So when mad when medics is
unnecessary was medical student
		
01:05:22 --> 01:05:23
			was he school
		
01:05:24 --> 01:05:26
			with medical students?
		
01:05:27 --> 01:05:30
			And it's only been one hour since I talked about that.
		
01:05:33 --> 01:05:34
			No.
		
01:05:44 --> 01:05:47
			Just a little while ago, I talked about a service. Right?
		
01:05:48 --> 01:05:57
			I said he was older than medic, okay. And he was medic teacher, but he still sucks from Hawaii from
America, nothing wrong with it. So
		
01:05:59 --> 01:05:59
			in general,
		
01:06:01 --> 01:06:03
			but medic has some headaches, this is
		
01:06:08 --> 01:06:15
			nothing wrong with it. Some of them have you think that you will not be a scholar of Hadith. And she
will narrate from people who are older than you and people who are younger than you.
		
01:06:17 --> 01:06:19
			So what medical students of design
		
01:06:21 --> 01:06:22
			so the chain is unbroken? That
		
01:06:23 --> 01:06:27
			was zaharie students, Hammond even jubair.
		
01:06:30 --> 01:06:34
			Well, if you go to the Boston Herald you will find the T word.
		
01:06:50 --> 01:06:55
			Broken machine is unbroken. Okay, all the way back to the pub or all the way back to
		
01:06:56 --> 01:06:57
			is missing what
		
01:07:02 --> 01:07:04
			is no
		
01:07:08 --> 01:07:12
			if someone is someone who does not commit to at least use the word I'm
		
01:07:13 --> 01:07:21
			from someone who he was a student from that means that it is here directly from him. So the only
people
		
01:07:26 --> 01:07:28
			they also use and
		
01:07:30 --> 01:07:37
			and then you get a heavy chain once you close more and then they might also use a shoe. Okay, this
is something we'll discuss later.
		
01:07:38 --> 01:07:38
			But
		
01:07:40 --> 01:07:41
			does the chain unbroken
		
01:07:42 --> 01:07:43
			chain unbroken?
		
01:07:45 --> 01:07:49
			Everyone's supply chain for maybe a job? Okay.
		
01:07:51 --> 01:07:52
			No.
		
01:07:54 --> 01:07:57
			Is there any issue there and then this heavy the heavy shed
		
01:08:02 --> 01:08:07
			he said that he heard the process in which he sort of thought and sort of the mother of
		
01:08:12 --> 01:08:13
			learning on how big your handwriting
		
01:08:17 --> 01:08:18
			but we'll get to that
		
01:08:19 --> 01:08:22
			Okay, is there is there any hobbies that you know of?
		
01:08:23 --> 01:08:28
			Is there any hobbies that you know that the province has still never restated sort of thought and
sort of smaller?
		
01:08:31 --> 01:08:32
			No, no.
		
01:08:34 --> 01:08:37
			Is there any hobbies that you know,
		
01:08:38 --> 01:08:43
			that says the Prophet says seldom used to only recite short solos and lots more.
		
01:08:48 --> 01:08:51
			But, can you think of anything this hadith contradicts
		
01:09:00 --> 01:09:03
			LS any hidden defects in this heading? Go to
		
01:09:10 --> 01:09:10
			equality
		
01:09:11 --> 01:09:21
			Okay, first of all, with respect to obviously la you cannot judge this by this chain right? You have
to look and study from other chains out there.
		
01:09:22 --> 01:09:30
			Is there any problem with the fact that he said this the first time that a man reached his heart, we
said earlier that we do not accept Harry from afar.
		
01:09:32 --> 01:09:38
			So, when he heard this sort of thought this means and he was not a believer.
		
01:09:39 --> 01:09:43
			In other words, that he was a novelist and word the father says Dylan we say this
		
01:09:45 --> 01:09:46
			is any problem with that.
		
01:09:48 --> 01:09:50
			Letter. You heard it in season two.
		
01:09:53 --> 01:09:55
			Like a dog on a leash.
		
01:10:00 --> 01:10:03
			isn't the first time that Eman introduce her
		
01:10:05 --> 01:10:06
			okay what
		
01:10:10 --> 01:10:24
			okay we talked about this before this when you convey the head if you must be Muslim we do not
accept any form for that and what you will your as the time you heard the heads or saw the incident
doesn't matter. We gave examples of this
		
01:10:28 --> 01:10:30
			the first time he went into this for
		
01:10:31 --> 01:10:32
			the first time that he felt
		
01:10:34 --> 01:10:34
			okay
		
01:10:43 --> 01:10:49
			even after my hair that doesn't mean that he was he wasn't Muslim or because of
		
01:10:50 --> 01:10:51
			this. This is
		
01:11:07 --> 01:11:11
			we just all the conditions are met we only have to worry about geography.
		
01:11:14 --> 01:11:14
			Dorothy
		
01:11:20 --> 01:11:23
			jiofi died in 127
		
01:11:24 --> 01:11:25
			this is Java and Java.
		
01:11:29 --> 01:11:36
			Okay, from the book the creme de la we see that the jiofi died in 127
		
01:11:39 --> 01:11:40
			and some people say 132
		
01:11:42 --> 01:11:43
			This is when he died
		
01:11:45 --> 01:11:50
			127 sibella she didn't want me
		
01:11:53 --> 01:12:02
			to say we're just sticking with it. Anytime you find something like this I mean the dates in between
also the feel the local
		
01:12:06 --> 01:12:08
			Okay, what's the it's not that we have
		
01:12:10 --> 01:12:14
			we had medic, right? medic live medic live from when doing
		
01:12:16 --> 01:12:18
			medic medic live from what 90
		
01:12:19 --> 01:12:21
			or 91 or something to win
		
01:12:26 --> 01:12:28
			something like 170
		
01:12:29 --> 01:12:31
			Okay, something is
		
01:12:35 --> 01:12:36
			in the news this
		
01:12:37 --> 01:12:39
			live from about
		
01:12:41 --> 01:12:43
			I'm approximating here but it's something like 130
		
01:12:45 --> 01:12:50
			to 200 or two no 141 42%
		
01:12:55 --> 01:12:56
			Okay.
		
01:13:01 --> 01:13:02
			What does this mean?
		
01:13:03 --> 01:13:07
			Is that deliver news and the Harrison color joke
		
01:13:13 --> 01:13:15
			142 to 10 so
		
01:13:17 --> 01:13:19
			this is when he died and this is
		
01:13:26 --> 01:13:27
			the conclusion from
		
01:13:30 --> 01:13:33
			clear clear that few people have the wrong job
		
01:13:35 --> 01:13:37
			as Mohammed administrators are in
		
01:13:39 --> 01:13:39
			the news
		
01:13:45 --> 01:13:50
			so you have to make sure you identify the people correct if you just jumped to the conclusion that
agenda Jovi
		
01:13:52 --> 01:13:54
			you're gonna have you're gonna have lots of trouble with this
		
01:13:56 --> 01:13:58
			is Mohammed eminence Mind Body
		
01:14:04 --> 01:14:06
			The reason I did not mention
		
01:14:08 --> 01:14:10
			body color body
		
01:14:11 --> 01:14:13
			and give this now what would you say?
		
01:14:14 --> 01:14:16
			This is a big mistake why
		
01:14:27 --> 01:14:37
			many books. One of his books is a series of COVID which I take one page from YouTube and Darryl
kabiri has many headed and when you discuss them there is as you give the headings.
		
01:14:39 --> 01:14:39
			Okay.
		
01:14:40 --> 01:14:59
			So just because as Buhari recorded it, it doesn't mean that it's if you recorded it in a technical
career, or it doesn't mean that the head either side. So I know that if I just tell you a body you
will assume automatically. That is that's not the case. But this particular head is that we studied
systems
		
01:15:00 --> 01:15:00
			Buhari
		
01:15:04 --> 01:15:05
			I just explained
		
01:15:16 --> 01:15:18
			with any any.
		
01:15:28 --> 01:15:31
			So like the example you gave me, I think you want to when we give the example of sufian.
		
01:15:38 --> 01:15:44
			But the humble actually the way they say for to humble, you don't have to be Muslim. But for that,
or to give it to someone else, you have to be
		
01:15:54 --> 01:15:57
			one ad
		
01:16:01 --> 01:16:04
			one ad or run one ad set between 180 and 190. I think
		
01:16:07 --> 01:16:08
			that's close enough,
		
01:16:09 --> 01:16:10
			close enough for government work as they say,
		
01:16:12 --> 01:16:14
			which one of those.
		
01:16:16 --> 01:16:16
			So
		
01:16:21 --> 01:16:40
			the easiest way is to start with the second and third condition. Because when you when you gather
the second and third condition, when you go to the books, you also will have a chance to see who
were the students and who were their teachers. So you can also check to make sure that there was
some relation between the different areas in the chain
		
01:16:44 --> 01:16:45
			to report the name of
		
01:16:47 --> 01:16:47
			actually,
		
01:16:50 --> 01:16:56
			shalom is a computer program will give them for example, the previous 10, he has it on his computer,
		
01:17:00 --> 01:17:08
			which is the short book this one. And it was just very basic information given about all news, I do
not believe we have
		
01:17:13 --> 01:17:21
			a computer program, we just type in the gym. And it is a little bit more to it than that, for
example checking
		
01:17:26 --> 01:17:27
			to see if it's unbroken
		
01:17:30 --> 01:17:37
			you could probably do I mean, it can give you it will give you all the information you need in
general. Yeah.
		
01:17:39 --> 01:17:41
			Any any computer you have to give a data otherwise.
		
01:17:45 --> 01:17:46
			I don't know if there is right now.
		
01:17:49 --> 01:17:55
			Any such action is more important for gel or for metanarratives than it is actually for Hades.
		
01:17:56 --> 01:17:58
			Because in the case of ritual, if you put it
		
01:18:00 --> 01:18:20
			if you do your best to get all the books of biographies and put it on computer, then you will have
the famous of all different scores concerning the narrator. While if you just have the headache, and
then you have to look for the narrator, there might be some books that you don't find or you forget
to look into. Which has some more discussion about the narrator that
		
01:18:22 --> 01:18:23
			you didn't
		
01:18:24 --> 01:18:26
			you didn't find but let me just
		
01:18:30 --> 01:18:33
			make a few more points before stuff is the tape still 90 minutes
		
01:18:37 --> 01:18:38
			late leave them
		
01:18:45 --> 01:18:46
			briefly and let me just
		
01:18:48 --> 01:18:50
			how this can be divided into
		
01:18:51 --> 01:18:52
			two types.
		
01:19:01 --> 01:19:01
			And this is
		
01:19:11 --> 01:19:12
			what we mean by
		
01:19:16 --> 01:19:19
			what's what it means is the headaches is narrated by so many people
		
01:19:21 --> 01:19:22
			in each of the several costs
		
01:19:24 --> 01:19:30
			that it is virtually impossible for them to have agreed upon to fabricate such a headache
		
01:19:34 --> 01:19:40
			does narrated sometimes even the number doesn't have to be that much but for example if you
		
01:19:41 --> 01:19:42
			want drama
		
01:19:49 --> 01:19:49
			to happen you
		
01:19:53 --> 01:19:55
			had anything which is not worth worth
		
01:19:56 --> 01:19:58
			anything which is nothing with the West. It was close.
		
01:20:04 --> 01:20:07
			I think anyway I think you're all familiar with the definition of words words.
		
01:20:08 --> 01:20:18
			There's no specific number any of them or anything they try to figure out what's the minimum number?
Most of them say for each generation makes the headmaster worth it, but it's more than
		
01:20:20 --> 01:20:29
			it's more than that. For example, if you have the headaches in many different parts of the Muslim
world and everyone is narrating the same headaches in the same way This will make it much worse even
if
		
01:20:31 --> 01:20:34
			you just have one for example buffet on one Gulf in one Yemen.
		
01:20:37 --> 01:20:43
			So what the Westerner had he is like the Quran by the way, was it all the Quran
		
01:20:45 --> 01:20:47
			or Hadith or automatically
		
01:20:58 --> 01:21:05
			use cases automatically So in other words, it doesn't have to work that you don't have to go through
any Is it
		
01:21:07 --> 01:21:08
			okay
		
01:21:10 --> 01:21:12
			and if it reaches a level called m
		
01:21:22 --> 01:21:24
			also M and
		
01:21:27 --> 01:21:28
			M and up
		
01:21:34 --> 01:21:35
			is also acceptance actually
		
01:21:41 --> 01:21:42
			no there's something
		
01:21:45 --> 01:21:45
			literally
		
01:21:47 --> 01:21:48
			what this means
		
01:21:50 --> 01:21:59
			and when the Oliver said the things have reached that level, it means it's not acceptable for any
Muslim to reject
		
01:22:00 --> 01:22:02
			these things because the type of prefer
		
01:22:04 --> 01:22:09
			to reject this like the Quran we reject the verse in the Quran
		
01:22:11 --> 01:22:28
			By the way, these two terms basically what the thing is that these are any definitive knowledge
unquestionable definitive knowledge what this term means to something should be known to everyone
that he says it there's definite knowledge even without inspection or investigation.
		
01:22:31 --> 01:22:32
			So anyone who denies these
		
01:22:34 --> 01:22:38
			things from this category like the Quran or mutawatir Hadith is considered a type of
		
01:22:40 --> 01:22:42
			and because these things are unquestionable
		
01:22:46 --> 01:22:55
			well you'll find them pretty much anywhere like for example some of the most of the Harris came up
with it has two types one is warning
		
01:22:59 --> 01:23:00
			and the other one
		
01:23:02 --> 01:23:12
			the meaning okay with the weapon in its wording with what was it and its meaning but the western is
ruling means it's the narrative with the exact same wording and it through so many changes
		
01:23:20 --> 01:23:24
			An example of this is the men kibali in watermelon
		
01:23:26 --> 01:23:27
			macadam and
		
01:23:30 --> 01:23:34
			then this this heavy it was narrated by something like 82 Sahaba
		
01:23:35 --> 01:23:37
			with exactly the same wording
		
01:23:38 --> 01:23:51
			so it doesn't look like that in its wording some of the headings inside the headings the headings
Muslim are of this category. Yeah, not all of them. There is a book by someone by the name of
kittanning
		
01:23:52 --> 01:23:54
			I ordered the book on supply hope is in the mail.
		
01:23:56 --> 01:23:59
			There's a book by Catania collection of what was that heavy?
		
01:24:06 --> 01:24:08
			Yeah, from the different book See?
		
01:24:11 --> 01:24:12
			When I get the book of
		
01:24:15 --> 01:24:16
			letters, a few 100
		
01:24:17 --> 01:24:17
			equals a
		
01:24:20 --> 01:24:23
			few 100 and they were talking about the exact same wording.
		
01:24:27 --> 01:24:28
			Okay, what was the meaning?
		
01:24:30 --> 01:24:34
			different categories, most of the headings and subheadings they're Muslim are motivated and meaning
		
01:24:35 --> 01:24:43
			they have not been narrated in the exact same words by many people need to step across but their
meaning is supported
		
01:24:44 --> 01:24:45
			by different headings
		
01:24:46 --> 01:24:47
			and each double quote.
		
01:24:51 --> 01:24:52
			I don't remember Adam
		
01:24:54 --> 01:24:56
			Smith. He also has a book
		
01:25:02 --> 01:25:03
			Because of a meeting with
		
01:25:05 --> 01:25:09
			someone, and one variation, which was that
		
01:25:10 --> 01:25:13
			there's an increase in the wording of the heading. And it's not
		
01:25:15 --> 01:25:17
			everyone doesn't have that increase or addition
		
01:25:18 --> 01:25:21
			of everyone doesn't have that addition then it will help me with what
		
01:25:24 --> 01:25:24
			they have.
		
01:25:28 --> 01:25:45
			Okay, then that then that part, if, for example, the headman can devalue and it is narrated in
different contexts, but always with the same wording inside that context I mean instead sometimes
someone includes the whole statement of the promises and um, sometimes someone just includes that
		
01:25:52 --> 01:25:58
			you have to study the change to see who never had a nice generation and so forth. Okay.
		
01:26:02 --> 01:26:05
			If you read just to get this there's another book by acuity also
		
01:26:10 --> 01:26:22
			that meaning there's a lot of meaning for example the heads if you raise your hand during draw and
it is many many heads the state that the publicist in them raised they raised his hand during God
but they're completely different How do you
		
01:26:24 --> 01:26:29
			I mean, one is during the budget one is after the last one is during
		
01:26:31 --> 01:26:34
			different this is called evil like this
		
01:26:35 --> 01:26:35
			this way
		
01:26:37 --> 01:26:46
			so many different incidences but all of them say that the publicist didn't raise his hand while
making drugs. So therefore and they are tortured in the meaning
		
01:26:52 --> 01:26:53
			outside of
		
01:26:56 --> 01:26:57
			from the shadows
		
01:27:01 --> 01:27:02
			as we've been talking about
		
01:27:05 --> 01:27:09
			if anyone says Yanni that the process and him did not do it
		
01:27:12 --> 01:27:15
			at all, ever, he ever said it he ever did it.
		
01:27:23 --> 01:27:24
			Okay.
		
01:27:25 --> 01:27:26
			Model threes
		
01:27:29 --> 01:27:30
			and humblest up isn't
		
01:27:35 --> 01:27:35
			that
		
01:27:40 --> 01:27:43
			different, different questions so what was the point that I was going to make?
		
01:27:52 --> 01:27:53
			So what the quotes
		
01:27:55 --> 01:27:56
			were below
		
01:28:03 --> 01:28:10
			I had or I had give me divided into different types. We're not the system now. Without just
mentioned them.
		
01:28:12 --> 01:28:12
			One is mature.
		
01:28:21 --> 01:28:22
			We're going to look
		
01:28:37 --> 01:28:38
			at as
		
01:28:43 --> 01:28:44
			long
		
01:28:48 --> 01:28:50
			as he isn't worried
		
01:28:52 --> 01:28:53
			and isn't very
		
01:28:54 --> 01:29:01
			different types of I had had it, but I had had it we have to the search whether they are any they
meet the conditions.
		
01:29:08 --> 01:29:18
			We will discuss remind me to begin next time about what I had had these are considered an mulyani
robbery but
		
01:29:19 --> 01:29:20
			we'll discuss that next time.
		
01:29:27 --> 01:29:30
			These are the ones we have to study the