Haitham al-Haddad – Brother who facilitated a divorce (Faskh) and immediately married her

Haitham al-Haddad
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses a situation where a woman was divorced and married to a brother, but she was not from the Muslim community. The speaker suggests that the woman may have had a difficult time getting married due to her divorced status. The situation is discussed as a "slack that misunderstood" and is related to the topic of divorce.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:20
			This is another common problem. very frequent question. Chef, this sister was divorced, and I want
to propose to her. Yeah. How can I go for that procedure? I said, She's divorced, how long she's
been divorced? I don't know or yeah, she was divorced last month or
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:24
			as one brother has done.
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:30
			And this is a case I dealt with recently and his wife.
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:32
			Unfortunately, she was
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:37
			she was not Muslim. And she accepted this law.
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:42
			And her husband was giving her a hard time.
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:45
			She was not Christian.
		
00:00:47 --> 00:01:07
			But she was from the people of the book. Okay. She got married to a brother, who gave her a hard
time as she said, then another brother, they knew about her and he felt sorry for her. And he
facilitated the divorce for her.
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:18
			And then when they went to an Imam, a brave imam who dissolved her marriage.
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:25
			Okay. The brother proposed to her immediately on the spot.
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			This is a big hello.
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:31
			If this wave
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:33
			okay if it is not
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:50
			provided that this festival is valid, I don't believe that it was a valid first anyway. Okay. But if
you propose to divorce woman in her Ada, as if you are proposing to a married woman
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:53
			is it clear?
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:55
			Yes.
		
00:01:57 --> 00:02:05
			Is it clear or not? As if you are proposing to any of your friends wives, can you do this?
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:08
			This is exactly the same.
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:12
			So that's why we need to understand this rolling.
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:22
			It is a rolling that is misunderstood. I always speak about it. That divorce see is what
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:24
			is alive.
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:34
			And that's why as we said yesterday, last time that she does not have to consent for