Ali Ataie – Is God Allah

Ali Ataie
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss the use of words and phrases in Arabic and Arabic language, emphasizing the trivium and the importance of understanding the Greek word "IT" and the holy Greek language in the Bible. They also touch on the unexpected hesitation people experience in the Bible and the use of "people" in pop culture and the Bible's history.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:01 --> 00:00:02

greetings of peace.

00:00:03 --> 00:00:08

My name is Sofia Ahmed, and it's my honor tonight on behalf of

00:00:08 --> 00:00:12

zaytuna college, to welcome all of you to what we hope is an

00:00:12 --> 00:00:15

enlightening and stimulating evening. I want to welcome all

00:00:15 --> 00:00:19

those in the room here. But also, we have a lot of people watching

00:00:19 --> 00:00:24

online from across the country and across the globe as far as I know.

00:00:24 --> 00:00:28

So welcome to all of you. First things first, we will begin

00:00:28 --> 00:00:33

tonight's program with a Quran recitation. And that will be done

00:00:33 --> 00:00:37

first in Arabic and then reading followed by reading of the

00:00:37 --> 00:00:43

translation in English. And that will be done by Abraham Najib. He

00:00:43 --> 00:00:47

is a student at zaytuna College in his senior year. Abraham Knuckey

00:00:47 --> 00:00:48

please

00:00:50 --> 00:00:56

it will be law he means shining upon your Lagina GE game

00:00:58 --> 00:01:04

Bismillah here Walkman you're he

00:01:07 --> 00:01:08

now

00:01:10 --> 00:01:19

has an ALA jabber Jabba Ali Nara ADA Hoon Kashi I'm Muto sloth the

00:01:20 --> 00:01:22

mean harsh yet in

00:01:25 --> 00:01:26

what he can

00:01:27 --> 00:01:33

do now God evil Halleen Cena Allah whom yet

00:01:39 --> 00:01:42

who Allahu La de la

00:01:43 --> 00:01:51

ilaha illa who OReilly movie he wants shahada

00:01:52 --> 00:01:56

man or he

00:01:58 --> 00:02:00

who Allahu

00:02:02 --> 00:02:13

ilaha illa who al Maliki Malecon dorso Salamone? Minalima Haman on

00:02:13 --> 00:02:18

Aziz Zun jab BA. can be

00:02:19 --> 00:02:26

super Han Allah here um, you Sherry goon

00:02:27 --> 00:02:34

Suba Han Allah here I'm Matthew shriek goon

00:02:36 --> 00:02:43

who Allahu Holly upon Barry soundware Hola. Hola. Smile.

00:02:45 --> 00:02:45

own host

00:02:47 --> 00:02:52

used to be hula hula mafi sama was the one

00:02:54 --> 00:02:59

use that Beholder who mafi summer he won

00:03:01 --> 00:03:13

one who idolizes on hockey team. Sada Allah Hoon and Alim was sada

00:03:13 --> 00:03:19

rasuna Han nadie Yun, Karim. Juana Juana that he can beat Aisha he

00:03:19 --> 00:03:25

Shahidi in our shack eating Allahumma Ohana earning RV.

00:03:43 --> 00:03:47

Had we made this Quran descend upon a mountain

00:03:48 --> 00:03:53

that would have seen it humbled, rent asunder by the fear of God.

00:03:55 --> 00:04:00

These are the parables we set forth for mankind, that happily

00:04:00 --> 00:04:01

they may reflect,

00:04:02 --> 00:04:06

he has God other than whom there is no God,

00:04:07 --> 00:04:09

nor of the unseen and the seen.

00:04:11 --> 00:04:14

And he is the Compassionate, the Merciful.

00:04:15 --> 00:04:18

He is God other than whom there is no God.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:26

The sovereign, the holy, peace, the faithful, the protector, the

00:04:26 --> 00:04:32

Mighty, the Compeller, the proud, Glory be to Him above the partners

00:04:32 --> 00:04:33

they ascribe.

00:04:34 --> 00:04:41

He has God, the Creator, the maker, the fashioner unto Him

00:04:41 --> 00:04:46

belong the most beautiful names. Whatsoever is in the heavens and

00:04:46 --> 00:04:50

earth glorifies Him. And here's the mighty the wise

00:05:01 --> 00:05:02

Thank you brain.

00:05:04 --> 00:05:07

Before we begin the program, I have one quick announcement, it's

00:05:07 --> 00:05:11

more of a suggestion actually, for those of you who may have noticed,

00:05:11 --> 00:05:16

we have a new bookstore across the hallway outside this hall. And

00:05:16 --> 00:05:20

there's some great gift ideas in there and books. And I've been

00:05:20 --> 00:05:24

told for the audience in the hall tonight, there's a special

00:05:24 --> 00:05:27

discount on all the beautiful gift ideas there. So if you want to

00:05:27 --> 00:05:29

check it out after the program, please do so.

00:05:31 --> 00:05:36

This bookstore is a not just has great products and books, but also

00:05:36 --> 00:05:39

helps lead to not college and generating income as well.

00:05:40 --> 00:05:45

Tonight's program is going to be fairly simple, we will, I will in

00:05:45 --> 00:05:48

a minute introduce our dean of faculty who will then introduce

00:05:48 --> 00:05:49

our speaker

00:05:51 --> 00:05:55

and topic for tonight, after which you will have a talk by Dr. Olea

00:05:55 --> 00:05:59

thigh, after which there will be time for question and answers

00:05:59 --> 00:06:02

inshallah. So they will we'll be taking some questions and

00:06:02 --> 00:06:06

questions from this audience. And I will direct you to the

00:06:06 --> 00:06:09

microphone that set up here. For those of you want to ask

00:06:09 --> 00:06:12

questions. Keep in mind that you can ask questions later. And then

00:06:12 --> 00:06:16

we'll also be taking questions from our online audience as well.

00:06:16 --> 00:06:22

So they will do that after the talk. So let me introduce it's my

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24

pleasure to introduce someone I work with a lot every day at

00:06:24 --> 00:06:28

zaytuna College and that is our Dean of Faculty Dr. Mark Mark

00:06:28 --> 00:06:29

Delp.

00:06:30 --> 00:06:33

But to Doug's background is in ancient and medieval topics,

00:06:33 --> 00:06:37

especially the metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas and new Platonism

00:06:38 --> 00:06:41

and that he studied at our neighboring institution here, the

00:06:41 --> 00:06:45

graduate theological union. Over the years he has taught scholastic

00:06:45 --> 00:06:48

logic, medieval metaphysics and courses centered around figures

00:06:48 --> 00:06:52

such as Plato and Aristotle and St. Augustine and St. Thomas

00:06:52 --> 00:06:55

Aquinas. After a career teaching at the Dominican School of

00:06:55 --> 00:06:59

Theology and Philosophy, which is also in the neighborhood here. He

00:06:59 --> 00:07:02

has come to the tuna and has been teaching courses here and is now

00:07:03 --> 00:07:04

the dean of faculty.

00:07:05 --> 00:07:09

Dr. Delp also teaches courses in logic and philosophy at zaytuna.

00:07:09 --> 00:07:13

So without further ado, please welcome Dr. Mark Delp.

00:07:14 --> 00:07:18

At our first commencement, Sheikh Abdullah bin baya compared zaytuna

00:07:18 --> 00:07:19

College to an olive tree.

00:07:21 --> 00:07:26

He said, the zaytuna tree can grow in the shade, it can grow on the

00:07:26 --> 00:07:30

sand, it can grow in extreme climates, and it can grow in

00:07:30 --> 00:07:31

moderate climates.

00:07:32 --> 00:07:36

It has qualities you don't find in other trees. My hope is that

00:07:36 --> 00:07:40

zaytuna College is a place where all people can be shaded by its

00:07:40 --> 00:07:45

intellectual tree, which is not limited to the east or the west,

00:07:46 --> 00:07:50

the zaytuna tree bears a fruit. But from that fruit which is also

00:07:50 --> 00:07:55

eaten, comes in oil. Even more wondrously is a source of light.

00:07:56 --> 00:08:00

And we use that as a tuna, the olive branch as a universal sign

00:08:00 --> 00:08:02

of peace, and quote,

00:08:04 --> 00:08:07

This image has remained with me as the definitive symbol of zaytuna

00:08:07 --> 00:08:08

College.

00:08:09 --> 00:08:12

Now the English word symbol comes from the Greek symbol alone.

00:08:13 --> 00:08:17

One of the meanings of which is agreement or covenant.

00:08:18 --> 00:08:21

There is a harmony and a firm covenant, and the promise of

00:08:21 --> 00:08:26

mutual cooperation even in the harshest of times, but only if it

00:08:26 --> 00:08:30

is only if it is foundational in its very nature.

00:08:31 --> 00:08:35

But it's a tuner. The scholarly cooperation between East and West

00:08:35 --> 00:08:40

is built into the foundations of its curriculum, the trivium of

00:08:40 --> 00:08:44

grammar, logic and rhetoric, each of which skills the student must

00:08:44 --> 00:08:48

master in both classical Western and Islamic traditions.

00:08:49 --> 00:08:54

beginning our cooperative venture there, we then study perennial

00:08:54 --> 00:08:58

texts in which the central ideas of Islam and the classical West

00:08:58 --> 00:09:02

begin to emerge, both on their own and in conversation with each

00:09:02 --> 00:09:03

other.

00:09:04 --> 00:09:07

Here the integrity of the covenant is challenged, as well as the

00:09:07 --> 00:09:09

peace promised by the olive tree.

00:09:11 --> 00:09:14

As a Catholic philosopher, I have seen while teaching here at

00:09:14 --> 00:09:18

zaytuna College, many wondrous harmonies between Muslim and

00:09:18 --> 00:09:22

Christian philosophy and theology, even at the deepest levels of

00:09:22 --> 00:09:26

their respective doctrines, only to be dismayed upon discovering

00:09:26 --> 00:09:30

that a conflict between two ideas can threaten the whole

00:09:32 --> 00:09:36

can Aristotle's theory of high low morphism ever be reconciled with

00:09:36 --> 00:09:37

Islamic occasional ism.

00:09:39 --> 00:09:43

But in the face of seemingly incommensurable ideas, I found the

00:09:43 --> 00:09:47

promise of the intellectual olive tree which in itself does not

00:09:47 --> 00:09:50

signify a doctrine, but a bond of kinship.

00:09:52 --> 00:09:57

Can there be such a bond between incommensurable ideas? Or indeed,

00:09:57 --> 00:09:59

is it for the sake of incommensurable idea

00:10:00 --> 00:10:02

Is that the bond has been established.

00:10:04 --> 00:10:08

Each party must reach back to common principles and common

00:10:08 --> 00:10:11

methods of thinking. And thus we retreat to the trivium and

00:10:11 --> 00:10:15

rediscover the bonds we forged they're hoping to return to the

00:10:15 --> 00:10:19

higher realms of thought to seek again the unity of ideas.

00:10:21 --> 00:10:25

Well, under the zaytuna tree, however, we need never despair, of

00:10:25 --> 00:10:27

achieving the covenant we seek,

00:10:28 --> 00:10:31

and may even come to believe that after all, the greatest love is

00:10:31 --> 00:10:33

between income measurables.

00:10:35 --> 00:10:38

What we are attempting to do here at zaytuna College is both

00:10:38 --> 00:10:42

hazardous and exhilarating. We have designed a curriculum that

00:10:42 --> 00:10:46

holds us together and creative tension, keeping us close to the

00:10:46 --> 00:10:48

vitality of thought itself.

00:10:49 --> 00:10:53

There has been much talk lately of creative destruction. But

00:10:53 --> 00:10:57

destruction, like unbridled criticism is actually quite easy

00:10:57 --> 00:11:02

to accomplish. far harder to achieve is mindful reconstruction,

00:11:03 --> 00:11:07

which in the areas of comparative theology demands careful work

00:11:07 --> 00:11:08

indeed.

00:11:10 --> 00:11:14

And his lecture for us this evening, Dr. Alia Thai has chosen

00:11:14 --> 00:11:19

to address the central teachings of three religious traditions. And

00:11:19 --> 00:11:22

as you will hear, he has done that careful work.

00:11:25 --> 00:11:29

Dr. Olea Tai has been involved in interfaith activities for over 15

00:11:29 --> 00:11:34

years. He has been a guest lecturer, and guest instructor at

00:11:34 --> 00:11:39

several colleges and universities, including Cal Poly state, UC

00:11:39 --> 00:11:45

Davis, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Cal State, East Bay, and others. He

00:11:45 --> 00:11:50

studied various Islamic sciences with local San Francisco Bay Area

00:11:50 --> 00:11:55

scholars. He is a graduate of the botter Arabic Language Institute

00:11:55 --> 00:12:00

and how to remote Yemen and studied at the prestigious Dar Al

00:12:00 --> 00:12:05

Mustafa, also in Hadramaut, under some of the most eminent scholars

00:12:05 --> 00:12:09

in the world, he holds a master's degree in Biblical Studies from

00:12:09 --> 00:12:13

the graduate theological Union at Berkeley, with emphasis upon the

00:12:13 --> 00:12:18

New Testament. He is the first Muslim seminarian in the 147 year

00:12:18 --> 00:12:21

history of the school to earn this degree.

00:12:22 --> 00:12:27

He is certified in Arabic, Hebrew, and Biblical Greek, and is fluent

00:12:27 --> 00:12:32

in Farsi. He is. He has recently obtained a PhD in Islamic biblical

00:12:32 --> 00:12:37

hermeneutics at the GTU the graduate theological union, and is

00:12:37 --> 00:12:41

a faculty member at zaytuna College, where he teaches Arabic,

00:12:41 --> 00:12:46

Arabic grammar and texts, Introduction to Introduction to

00:12:46 --> 00:12:52

excuse me, to the Quran, Quranic sciences and comparative theology.

00:12:53 --> 00:12:57

His dissertation was entitled authenticating the Johanna and in

00:12:57 --> 00:13:02

G Sunette, Poli moronic, interpretive methodological

00:13:02 --> 00:13:04

approaches to the Gospel of John.

00:13:05 --> 00:13:08

Please join me in welcoming Dr. Olea. Ty.

00:13:15 --> 00:13:19

Spent Rahim, Salah, lastly the Mohammed in one early he was a

00:13:19 --> 00:13:21

comedian Marian. Thank you, Dr. Dope.

00:13:23 --> 00:13:27

Thank you, brother, Ibrahim. Thank you. So if you're Tonight's topic

00:13:27 --> 00:13:31

is going to jump right into it. I have a lot to say there's limited

00:13:31 --> 00:13:39

time is God is the God of Abraham, is the God of the Bible. Is that

00:13:39 --> 00:13:40

God, Allah?

00:13:41 --> 00:13:44

And the answer is yes. Thank you very much.

00:13:46 --> 00:13:50

I want to begin by looking at some linguistic nuances of Arabic and

00:13:50 --> 00:13:53

Hebrew, Arabic and Hebrew are sister languages. They have a

00:13:53 --> 00:13:57

common origin. They're part of a group of languages called the

00:13:57 --> 00:14:02

Semitic languages, aloha to Sam yet, along with Ethiopic, and

00:14:02 --> 00:14:07

Aramaic, Syriac, Akkadian, Ugaritic, and others. The word

00:14:07 --> 00:14:10

Semite actually comes from the Hebrew word Shem. Shem was one of

00:14:10 --> 00:14:13

the sons of Noah that survived the flood.

00:14:14 --> 00:14:18

The grandson of Shem, was named Eva, which is where the word

00:14:18 --> 00:14:22

Hebrew comes from, probably the prophet hood. Allah His tsunami is

00:14:22 --> 00:14:25

buried in Hadramaut. That was the name of his grandson Also,

00:14:25 --> 00:14:31

according to Genesis, chapter 10. So I either spoke what German

00:14:31 --> 00:14:35

philologist refer to as older summit ish or some sort of proto

00:14:35 --> 00:14:40

or primordial, Semitic language. The major characteristic between

00:14:40 --> 00:14:44

these two languages is that they share primitive roots most of them

00:14:44 --> 00:14:50

are try literal. In many cases, the Hebrew and Arabic cognates are

00:14:50 --> 00:14:53

literally identical. So for example, the word nephesh in

00:14:53 --> 00:14:57

Hebrew nephesh means soul or self, what's the word in Arabic

00:14:58 --> 00:14:59

knifes, right

00:15:00 --> 00:15:07

or in Hebrew, or an Hebrew rule Kadosh right rule Hello kudos, a

00:15:07 --> 00:15:11

spirit of sanctification, a spirit of holiness, or the word set D.

00:15:12 --> 00:15:17

Which means a righteous one a holy one Siddiq, or the Hebrew word

00:15:17 --> 00:15:22

Psalm. What does that what does that in Arabic. So yes, fasting,

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25

sometimes not so obvious and you have to look at what are what are

00:15:25 --> 00:15:30

known as prominent letters. So that the Hebrew word ahava, right?

00:15:30 --> 00:15:34

The prominent letters are the hay in the bait. So this is muhabba,

00:15:34 --> 00:15:40

right Ha, and by means love for the word in Arabic for God with a

00:15:40 --> 00:15:43

capital G is Allah.

00:15:46 --> 00:15:52

Allah, the earliest attestation of Allah is an inscription at a place

00:15:52 --> 00:15:57

called Cadet alpha in the first century of the Common Era. What's

00:15:57 --> 00:16:01

interesting about the name Allah here is, and this is something

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04

that we just talked about earlier, is four letters. Elif LAMINAM,

00:16:04 --> 00:16:12

hey, or Ha, if you take off the initial Elif, you get Lilla. For

00:16:12 --> 00:16:18

God, if you take off the first lamb, you get Lahu for him. And if

00:16:18 --> 00:16:22

you take off the next letter, you get who him. I can't think of

00:16:22 --> 00:16:26

another word in Arabic where this happens. What's also interesting

00:16:26 --> 00:16:29

about Arabic and Hebrew is that all of the nouns in these

00:16:29 --> 00:16:33

languages are gender fide. So sometimes the gender is obvious

00:16:33 --> 00:16:38

what's known as natural gender. So like the word for boy in an Arabic

00:16:38 --> 00:16:42

wallet, if you want to say this is a boy, then you'd have to use the,

00:16:42 --> 00:16:45

the masculine singular demonstrative pronoun have that

00:16:45 --> 00:16:50

Well, that's obvious. Or ze yell ID in Hebrew. What's really

00:16:50 --> 00:16:55

interesting is that body parts in pairs in Arabic and Hebrew tend to

00:16:55 --> 00:17:00

be feminine in the singular. So the word for hand and Hebrew yard,

00:17:00 --> 00:17:03

if I want to say this is a hand I would use the feminine singular

00:17:03 --> 00:17:08

demonstrative pronoun Zota yard heavy YED. Right. So every word is

00:17:08 --> 00:17:11

assigned a Genesis, every word has a gender, sometimes it's natural.

00:17:11 --> 00:17:15

Sometimes it's a lexical gender. So for example, the sun and the

00:17:15 --> 00:17:21

moon, right? There are genderless. So the Arabs had to assign a

00:17:21 --> 00:17:25

lexical gender, the moon happens to be masculine, the son happens

00:17:25 --> 00:17:30

to be feminine. So we deal with Allah, the name of God. This word

00:17:30 --> 00:17:34

is lexically, masculine, but Muslims do not believe that Allah

00:17:34 --> 00:17:38

is male. God is not male nor female. Lisa committed he shaped

00:17:38 --> 00:17:42

when the Quran says there's nothing like the likes of God. But

00:17:42 --> 00:17:46

the Quran uses masculine pronouns like a Hua, he is because the word

00:17:46 --> 00:17:51

itself is lexically masculine. Another thing interesting about

00:17:51 --> 00:17:55

the name Allah is you can't say the name of God without your

00:17:55 --> 00:17:58

tongue prostrating. Try it.

00:17:59 --> 00:18:03

I saw it frustrated. Yes. You know, interesting also, as some

00:18:03 --> 00:18:06

Muslim theologians, they actually have a quick definition of the

00:18:06 --> 00:18:11

word Allah, simply for academic purposes. Obviously, there's no

00:18:12 --> 00:18:16

adequate definition of God. At best what we say about God is a

00:18:16 --> 00:18:19

distant, distant approximation, and at worst were totally wrong.

00:18:19 --> 00:18:24

Aquinas said, even the praise of God is so remote remote from his

00:18:24 --> 00:18:28

reality. Right? One of my teachers said that praising God requires

00:18:28 --> 00:18:34

repentance, because you can never get to the reality of God. My

00:18:34 --> 00:18:39

monitor he said, If you praise a king, who has 1000 gold pieces for

00:18:39 --> 00:18:43

having 1000 silver pieces, then you're insulting and disparaging

00:18:44 --> 00:18:44

the king,

00:18:45 --> 00:18:49

but this is what they say. They say Allah is I'm gonna Allah that

00:18:49 --> 00:18:56

a proper name denoting the essence YG boo Jude, the one who has

00:18:56 --> 00:19:00

necessary existence, I didn't muster happily Jimmy or the

00:19:00 --> 00:19:06

Camelot, the one who is deserving of every perfection, while materna

00:19:06 --> 00:19:12

Z and Jimmy and NACA is and he is absolutely free of every type of

00:19:12 --> 00:19:14

fault or deficiency.

00:19:16 --> 00:19:20

So the question is, is the Muslim and the Christian God, the same? I

00:19:20 --> 00:19:25

would say in principle, it's the same so Allah is not a foreign

00:19:25 --> 00:19:29

god. Right? Allah is the God of Abraham.

00:19:30 --> 00:19:34

If you look in the Christian Bible, if you open the first page

00:19:34 --> 00:19:38

and go to keytab, tech queen, the book of Genesis, in sorry, the

00:19:38 --> 00:19:42

Arabic Bible that was obviously done by that was translated by

00:19:42 --> 00:19:48

Arab Christians, you'll find thi filled but a halacha Allah who are

00:19:48 --> 00:19:50

somehow it was Ottawa.

00:19:51 --> 00:19:57

In the beginning, Allah created the heavens and the earth. So just

00:19:57 --> 00:19:59

a little bit here with with entomology,

00:20:00 --> 00:20:04

The definite article in Hebrew is different than an Arabic. The

00:20:04 --> 00:20:08

definite article in Hebrew looks like this. It's a high with a PATA

00:20:08 --> 00:20:13

or Fatah and then a doggish forte, a doubling in the next letter. So

00:20:13 --> 00:20:17

the word for king and a king in Hebrew was Mela. But if I want to

00:20:17 --> 00:20:22

say the King, I would say hi Meles Meles the definite article in

00:20:22 --> 00:20:23

Arabic is Allah.

00:20:25 --> 00:20:33

So Alif Lam, right? And the word for a deity or a god in Arabic, is

00:20:33 --> 00:20:38

Isla Han, which also begins with an Alif Lam the same letters. So

00:20:38 --> 00:20:41

there's an opinion and this is something that Muslim philologist

00:20:41 --> 00:20:43

also mentioned, is that the word Allah

00:20:45 --> 00:20:47

is simply a combination

00:20:48 --> 00:20:50

of Al Isla who

00:20:51 --> 00:20:56

al Isla, who and over time this guttural Hamza in the middle it

00:20:56 --> 00:20:59

elided. And we have the word Allah

00:21:02 --> 00:21:07

ZBD and his wonderful lexicon attached without us. He says that

00:21:07 --> 00:21:12

this is unlikely, because in Arabic, we can say Ya Allah.

00:21:14 --> 00:21:19

Yah is a vocative particle. So this translates to Oh God. And

00:21:19 --> 00:21:22

there's a rule in Arabic that the vocative particle cannot

00:21:22 --> 00:21:27

immediately precede the definite article. So if these two letters

00:21:27 --> 00:21:30

have a definite article, then it'd be improper Arabic to say Ya

00:21:30 --> 00:21:34

Allah, you'd have to say something. Yeah, you Hala or

00:21:34 --> 00:21:38

something like that. So, Edward lane, he says that the most

00:21:38 --> 00:21:42

correct opinion that says that's a direct quote from him, is that

00:21:42 --> 00:21:50

most are most likely. The initial Alif Lam, on the word Allah is

00:21:51 --> 00:21:57

related to the LF ulimate. In this Hebrew word, ale,

00:21:58 --> 00:22:03

which is the generic word for God. In Hebrew. This word ale is

00:22:03 --> 00:22:09

attested in the Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible, but more often than not,

00:22:09 --> 00:22:13

it's found in the plural form, which looks like this.

00:22:17 --> 00:22:21

Which is pronounced Elohim actually have a Hebrew translation

00:22:21 --> 00:22:25

of the Quran in my office, I didn't bring it. But the first

00:22:25 --> 00:22:29

page says be shame Elohim Bismillah in the name of God,

00:22:30 --> 00:22:35

right. So Elohim is a plural this here. This suffix makes it plural.

00:22:35 --> 00:22:38

This is a hearing with a Yoda and a meme. This is like the

00:22:38 --> 00:22:41

equivalent of the gem aroma Veca Salem in Arabic the sound

00:22:41 --> 00:22:46

masculine plural. However, this is not a plural of numbers, at least

00:22:46 --> 00:22:49

not when we're referring to the God of Abraham.

00:22:50 --> 00:22:54

Scholars believe that this is called a plurality magis status,

00:22:54 --> 00:22:59

or a royal plural, Gemma and Maliki. So if we quote again

00:22:59 --> 00:23:02

Genesis one one we will read in Hebrew but a sheath of Bara

00:23:03 --> 00:23:09

Elohim, at Hashem I am the edits. In the beginning God plural

00:23:09 --> 00:23:14

respected, plural, Royal plural, created the heavens and the earth.

00:23:15 --> 00:23:19

Now in certain pistol theme, that is to say verses of the Tanakh

00:23:20 --> 00:23:26

that stress the uniqueness of God. Ale the singular is used. For

00:23:26 --> 00:23:33

example, in Hosea 11, nine, we read key I know he al Veilleux

00:23:33 --> 00:23:40

ish. Indeed, I am a God, and not a man. This has translated in the

00:23:40 --> 00:23:44

Septuagint, the LX ex theosophical, me chi uHq and throw

00:23:44 --> 00:23:45

a pass.

00:23:46 --> 00:23:48

And according to gesenius,

00:23:50 --> 00:23:51

you know, you have this other form.

00:23:53 --> 00:23:56

That's attested in the Hebrew Bible. This is a low

00:23:58 --> 00:24:03

and a low according to gesenius is the emphatic form of ale, the

00:24:03 --> 00:24:06

emphatic form. So quite often in the Hebrew Bible, you'll find a

00:24:06 --> 00:24:13

low in the Hebrew when God is juxtaposed to false gods. For

00:24:13 --> 00:24:18

example, Deuteronomy 3217 It says about the Canaanites Yes. bahala

00:24:18 --> 00:24:24

che Diem, low elo. They sacrifice to che Diem Shayol teens to

00:24:24 --> 00:24:30

demons, and not to ello not to God and phatic Elohim Lo, yah, room to

00:24:30 --> 00:24:34

Gods. Now it's a real plural to gods that they don't even know.

00:24:34 --> 00:24:35

Right?

00:24:36 --> 00:24:39

Now the lingua franca of the ancient Near East in the sixth

00:24:39 --> 00:24:43

century, before the Common Era, the language of the Persian

00:24:43 --> 00:24:45

Empire, I had to throw on the word Persian. My students know what I'm

00:24:45 --> 00:24:46

talking about,

00:24:47 --> 00:24:53

was a language called Aramaic. Right? So major portions of the

00:24:53 --> 00:24:58

book of Daniel and Ezra are in Aramaic with Hebrew characters and

00:24:58 --> 00:25:00

Aramaic we find

00:25:00 --> 00:25:00

Word God.

00:25:01 --> 00:25:02

Maybe I should use it.

00:25:04 --> 00:25:04

There we go.

00:25:06 --> 00:25:10

We find the word God attested in the Aramaic as this

00:25:14 --> 00:25:23

which is pronounced Hola. Hola soy a comments Hey, aspiration, Allah.

00:25:24 --> 00:25:30

For example we read in Daniel 228 Brahm, e Thai Allah be Shi Mejia.

00:25:31 --> 00:25:38

There is God in heaven. Ezra five one be soon Allah, Israel in the

00:25:38 --> 00:25:39

name of the God of Israel.

00:25:41 --> 00:25:46

And Hebrew we also have these Theo forrec names TheFork names or

00:25:46 --> 00:25:49

names that have the word ale embedded within them, usually as a

00:25:49 --> 00:25:55

prefix or a suffix. We know these names Godfrey ALA, right? What's

00:25:55 --> 00:25:55

Gabrielle?

00:25:57 --> 00:26:02

Gabrielle right the power of God mi ka Al. Mi Ka L very

00:26:02 --> 00:26:04

interesting. This is a rhetorical question than a Michael is a

00:26:04 --> 00:26:09

rhetorical question. Man ka Allah who is like God, who is like God,

00:26:10 --> 00:26:15

mica Ale, Ishmael. Right. You shmatte is an imperfect tense

00:26:15 --> 00:26:19

about it. Yes, Mahala? Yes, Matt Allah, God will hear

00:26:20 --> 00:26:22

Eliyahu

00:26:23 --> 00:26:27

Eliyahu is Elijah le My God is yah hoo. This is one of the names of

00:26:27 --> 00:26:31

God in the Hebrew Bible. Also, in rabbinical literature. Yah hoo.

00:26:31 --> 00:26:37

Sometimes just who, sometimes just ya, hallelujah. Right. This is the

00:26:37 --> 00:26:42

PL or form to imperative. Praise God with intensity. Praise a yah

00:26:43 --> 00:26:47

with with intensity. Anytime you see that Ale, right L Ron Hubbard.

00:26:48 --> 00:26:52

Now I'm just kidding. I'm sorry. I had to throw it in. I'm sorry. I

00:26:52 --> 00:26:53

use that joke every time. I don't mean any.

00:26:55 --> 00:27:03

Anyway, Rabbi Louis Jacobs. He says here, this Ale, this root ale

00:27:03 --> 00:27:08

is found in the generic name of God among all Semitic peoples. We

00:27:08 --> 00:27:12

know from ooga Riddick literature, that ale was the name of one of

00:27:12 --> 00:27:18

the Canaanite gods, so all Semites they call God ale or variation of

00:27:18 --> 00:27:22

it. So could it be that the Muslims refer to Allah from Ale,

00:27:23 --> 00:27:27

but are actually worshipping another god? Okay, many anti

00:27:27 --> 00:27:31

Muslim polemicists, they perpetuate this claim that Muslims

00:27:31 --> 00:27:36

worship something called scene or the Babylonian moon god. Right?

00:27:36 --> 00:27:38

It's interesting. There was a Christian preacher in the second

00:27:38 --> 00:27:42

century named Marcion, who died 160, the Common Era, very

00:27:42 --> 00:27:46

interesting character. He was a gnostic, he was a dosa test. He

00:27:46 --> 00:27:52

said that, that the Jews worship and inferior God, a deceiver God,

00:27:53 --> 00:27:56

and that we Christians worship a better Gods who's a bi theist?

00:27:56 --> 00:28:00

Jews worship another God. Right. And he's quite popular in Rome.

00:28:00 --> 00:28:05

Marcion was vehemently opposed by proto Orthodox Church Fathers.

00:28:06 --> 00:28:10

Why? Because it was important for the church fathers to tell people

00:28:10 --> 00:28:14

that this is not another God. Right? This is the God of Israel.

00:28:14 --> 00:28:18

This is the God of Abraham. Yes, we have different concepts of God,

00:28:18 --> 00:28:23

we theologizing differently about this God, but it's the same God.

00:28:23 --> 00:28:26

Now, when I first heard this claim, when I was an

00:28:26 --> 00:28:29

undergraduate, like three or four years ago, I don't know something

00:28:29 --> 00:28:29

like that.

00:28:31 --> 00:28:34

I thought it was ridiculous. And I still think it's ridiculous. But

00:28:34 --> 00:28:37

here's the thing. I go to a lot of churches. And I'll tell you almost

00:28:37 --> 00:28:41

every single time this comes up, do you worship the moon god?

00:28:42 --> 00:28:45

Sometimes it's very subtle. Why do you have a lunar calendar?

00:28:46 --> 00:28:52

What does the star and the moon on the flag of Pakistan mean? Right?

00:28:52 --> 00:28:55

Probably the most well known of these anti Muslim polemicist

00:28:55 --> 00:28:59

that's perpetuating this false narrative. It's a man named Walid

00:28:59 --> 00:29:02

Shabbat, I don't know if you've heard of him, but he watched his

00:29:02 --> 00:29:06

videos, you know, hundreds of 1000s of hits, views on his

00:29:06 --> 00:29:09

videos. Right. And, you know, he described himself as a former

00:29:09 --> 00:29:12

terrorist, who became a born again, Christian.

00:29:14 --> 00:29:17

But just to give you an idea of one of the things that he is

00:29:17 --> 00:29:22

saying, in front of his many, many large audiences, so according to,

00:29:22 --> 00:29:25

and I show this to my students during the week, according to what

00:29:25 --> 00:29:26

each Shabbat

00:29:27 --> 00:29:30

you know, he said, he said he looked at the Codex Vaticanus.

00:29:31 --> 00:29:34

Right. Once you throw that term out there, you're like, Whoa, that

00:29:34 --> 00:29:36

accounts and here's the thing about what Shabbat he speaks

00:29:36 --> 00:29:40

Arabic. So he'll say for example, you know, La ilaha illallah,

00:29:40 --> 00:29:42

Muhammad Rasool Allah and then the Christian audiences. He's

00:29:42 --> 00:29:47

obviously a scholar, every Tom dick and Abdul knows how to say La

00:29:47 --> 00:29:50

ilaha illAllah. Muhammad Rasul Allah. Right. Well, he knows what

00:29:50 --> 00:29:52

he's talking about. So at the end of the day, it's an appeal to

00:29:52 --> 00:29:55

unqualified authority. But here's what he says. He says, I looked at

00:29:55 --> 00:30:00

the Codex data Canis revelation 1318 gives the number of

00:30:00 --> 00:30:05

The beast is represented by these three Greek letters, according to

00:30:05 --> 00:30:11

Gematria, this is 600. This is 60. And this is six equals 666. Right?

00:30:11 --> 00:30:12

This is what he says.

00:30:13 --> 00:30:17

Now, I looked at the Codex Vaticanus. There is no book of

00:30:17 --> 00:30:22

Revelation in the Codex Vaticanus. That's number one. So I'm thinking

00:30:22 --> 00:30:26

maybe he's thinking about the Codex Sinaiticus, another great

00:30:26 --> 00:30:30

fourth century onshore manuscript and Alexandrian Text type. The

00:30:30 --> 00:30:35

Codex Sinaiticus actually spells out 666 hexa, cassioli hexa

00:30:35 --> 00:30:40

contacts doesn't have these letters. So I don't really know

00:30:40 --> 00:30:44

what he's referring to here. Maybe the Textus Receptus, whatever it

00:30:44 --> 00:30:47

is, but here's what he says this is what He literally says. And he

00:30:47 --> 00:30:52

gets gasps from the audience. So he says here we have the x if you

00:30:52 --> 00:30:54

take these two and turn them over

00:30:58 --> 00:31:01

you get this and this says Bismillah.

00:31:05 --> 00:31:09

Bismillah is the mark of the beasts. Now, you know, you have to

00:31:09 --> 00:31:14

put a dot here. This doesn't work. This can't be attached. That's not

00:31:14 --> 00:31:18

a hey, what you know, okay. And then he said here here you have

00:31:18 --> 00:31:19

two swords.

00:31:21 --> 00:31:26

This is what he says. To pack audiences 1 million hits. Right

00:31:26 --> 00:31:29

that's like me going you know, here. You know, Santa.

00:31:30 --> 00:31:35

I move this right here. I move that right there. Satan

00:31:40 --> 00:31:44

or, you know, like this www. You know, when you put in a website, I

00:31:44 --> 00:31:46

don't know much about computers. I'm kind of a techno peasant. But

00:31:47 --> 00:31:53

www right. Oh, well, W is is the letter vav or wow, I say vav in

00:31:53 --> 00:31:58

Hebrew, and you know what I'm saying? I live bait Gimel Dalet.

00:31:58 --> 00:32:02

Hey, Vav 123456666.

00:32:05 --> 00:32:09

Okay, I think I've made my point with so here's the thing.

00:32:11 --> 00:32:14

What these people do is they take you know, a true historical

00:32:14 --> 00:32:18

narrative, and they sprinkle some deception. So there is something

00:32:18 --> 00:32:20

called the chronicle of Naboo Unitas

00:32:21 --> 00:32:27

Naboo. Notice nebo notice was the last king of Babylon. Right while

00:32:27 --> 00:32:31

the Shabbat says he was the son of Nebuchadnezzar. No, the son of

00:32:31 --> 00:32:35

Nebuchadnezzar as was was named Imelda Mar Duke. This is the last

00:32:35 --> 00:32:39

king of, of Babylon. So the Chronicle says a noble knight is

00:32:39 --> 00:32:46

he came to northern Arabia. Right? He came to a place called tame Ma,

00:32:46 --> 00:32:49

which looks like this.

00:32:51 --> 00:32:56

In Hebrew tamer, and being in tamer, it gave him access to

00:32:56 --> 00:33:00

southern cities. And the Chronicle mentions a city called er three

00:33:00 --> 00:33:00

boo.

00:33:02 --> 00:33:06

He acted evil, right yesterday, Boo Yathrib. This is probably yes,

00:33:06 --> 00:33:09

rib is the pre Islamic name of the city of Medina, the city of the

00:33:09 --> 00:33:12

Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu sallam.

00:33:13 --> 00:33:18

So as the narrative goes from the polemicists that Naboo Unitas he

00:33:18 --> 00:33:22

tried to convert the Arabs to worship Marduk and it didn't work.

00:33:23 --> 00:33:29

So then he tried sin. Si n, the Babylonian moon god, and

00:33:29 --> 00:33:32

apparently this caught like wildfire. This is the narrative

00:33:32 --> 00:33:35

1000 years before the birth of the Prophet in Medina, the last

00:33:35 --> 00:33:40

Babylonian king went to tamer and can convert it or convince some of

00:33:40 --> 00:33:44

the Arabs there, that to worship sin, the Babylonian Moon God,

00:33:44 --> 00:33:47

therefore, every Muslim in the world worships the Babylonian moon

00:33:47 --> 00:33:52

god. So is a terrible non sequitur argument. First of all, there's

00:33:52 --> 00:33:56

there's no atom illogical correspondence correspondences

00:33:56 --> 00:33:59

between sin and the name Allah. But then again, the argument is,

00:33:59 --> 00:34:01

well, maybe the error was recalling sin Allah.

00:34:02 --> 00:34:05

Here's another thing about the polemicist is they don't tell you

00:34:05 --> 00:34:09

the whole story. It's half the story. If you asked me. All right.

00:34:09 --> 00:34:13

Tell me about Paul. And I say, Well, Paul was a Benjamin I'd

00:34:13 --> 00:34:16

Pharisee who used to persecute Christians. And you say, That's

00:34:16 --> 00:34:22

it. Yeah. That's deceptive. Tell me about Judas Iscariot. He was a

00:34:22 --> 00:34:27

disciple of Jesus. What else? No. Don't worry about it. You know,

00:34:27 --> 00:34:32

like the Arab say, you know, la takanobu. Salah. Don't pray? Well,

00:34:32 --> 00:34:35

untrim secara right. Gotta keep reading. Don't pray while you're

00:34:35 --> 00:34:36

intoxicated.

00:34:37 --> 00:34:42

So, in 1947, the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered. And there was an

00:34:42 --> 00:34:46

interesting parchment discovered, written in Aramaic. It's

00:34:46 --> 00:34:51

catalogued as for q 242. It was found in Qumran cave number four.

00:34:52 --> 00:34:53

It's called the prayer of Naboo Unitas

00:34:55 --> 00:34:58

Hmm. So this is something that the Essenes the Jewish community had

00:34:58 --> 00:34:59

Qumran on the shores of the Dead.

00:35:00 --> 00:35:03

See something that they revered is almost scripture. And it's very

00:35:03 --> 00:35:06

short but we have Naboo Knight is speaking in the first person.

00:35:07 --> 00:35:10

Here's what he says. I was afflicted with an ulcer for seven

00:35:10 --> 00:35:15

years, and an exorcist pardon my sins. He was a Jewish sage from

00:35:15 --> 00:35:19

among the children of exile of Judah. So the southern kingdom so

00:35:19 --> 00:35:23

according to Western historians, the first massive wave of Jews

00:35:23 --> 00:35:28

coming into Arabia came after the collapse of Judah, the southern

00:35:28 --> 00:35:32

kingdom. 586. Before the Common Era during the Babylonian

00:35:32 --> 00:35:36

invasion, Jeremiah went into Egypt, many Arab many Jews, they

00:35:36 --> 00:35:39

came and poured down into the Arabian Peninsula. That's why you

00:35:39 --> 00:35:42

have all these Jewish communities and Haber and take him out and

00:35:42 --> 00:35:42

yesterday

00:35:44 --> 00:35:48

Naboo Unitas continues, and he said to me, this Jewish sage he

00:35:48 --> 00:35:52

said to me, recount this in writing to glorify and exalt the

00:35:52 --> 00:35:57

name of the Most High God. And so I wrote this, I was afflicted with

00:35:57 --> 00:36:01

an ulcer in tema, by decree of the Most High God. For seven years I

00:36:01 --> 00:36:06

prayed to the gods of silver and gold, bronze and iron, wood and

00:36:06 --> 00:36:11

stone and clay because I had believed that they were gods. So

00:36:11 --> 00:36:15

who is this most high God that never Unitas came to embrace?

00:36:16 --> 00:36:19

Well, in the parchment and Aramaic, this is what he's called.

00:36:30 --> 00:36:31

Allah Ha,

00:36:33 --> 00:36:33

aloha.

00:36:35 --> 00:36:36

Ally,

00:36:37 --> 00:36:41

Aloha ally, Allahu Allah.

00:36:42 --> 00:36:47

And definitely with aloha, and Allah. There are etymological

00:36:48 --> 00:36:51

correspondences. But what's more important here is that this is not

00:36:51 --> 00:36:56

the moon god. This is the God of Abraham. This is the God of the

00:36:56 --> 00:36:59

Jews. You see, the Arabs at the time of the Prophet Mohammed

00:36:59 --> 00:37:02

continued to revere Allah as the Most High God, but there was a

00:37:02 --> 00:37:06

falling away and they adopted lesser deities, they've practiced

00:37:06 --> 00:37:10

a form of polytheism called Henault theism, where there's one

00:37:10 --> 00:37:15

supreme god but lesser deities. The there was also a group of, of

00:37:15 --> 00:37:19

Arabs in Mecca during the time of the prophets birth, who were

00:37:19 --> 00:37:24

called Allahu NEFA. Allahu NEFA. These were people who rejected all

00:37:24 --> 00:37:30

Gods except Allah. Why? Because this they claimed was the legacy

00:37:30 --> 00:37:33

of their forefather Abraham and Ishmael and the Prophet was

00:37:33 --> 00:37:36

amongst them before he was commissioned as a prophet, the

00:37:36 --> 00:37:42

Arabs before Islam, they knew their history they knew the Kaaba,

00:37:42 --> 00:37:47

for example, the cube or House in Mecca was built by Abraham and

00:37:47 --> 00:37:47

Ishmael.

00:37:49 --> 00:37:52

So Islam is in a sense a reinstating of the primordial

00:37:52 --> 00:37:57

tradition, or faith of Abraham, and a cursory glance at verses in

00:37:57 --> 00:38:01

the Quran Kula sadhaka Allah for Tibi, Urmila to Ibrahima Hanifa

00:38:01 --> 00:38:06

What am I can I mean I'm sure he can say follow the religion of

00:38:06 --> 00:38:10

Abraham, the true and faith the archetypal monotheistic he did not

00:38:10 --> 00:38:14

associate a partner's with God. So Allah was understood as the most

00:38:14 --> 00:38:18

high God even before Islam amongst the Arabs. So what the polemicist

00:38:18 --> 00:38:19

will say is look,

00:38:21 --> 00:38:25

Islam was not invented by the by Muhammad, you know the prophets

00:38:25 --> 00:38:27

father's name was Abdullah.

00:38:28 --> 00:38:31

Right, so this was a pagan god before Islam now you see how

00:38:31 --> 00:38:36

they've deceived us. The Arabs knew of Allah as the Most High

00:38:36 --> 00:38:40

God, but they had gone to worshipping other gods as well. So

00:38:40 --> 00:38:43

what the Prophet Muhammad as Muslims understand, the Abrahamic

00:38:43 --> 00:38:49

tradition of monotheism was re instituted amongst them. If you

00:38:49 --> 00:38:54

look at the Quran, 4137 and from his signs are the day and the

00:38:54 --> 00:38:59

night, the sun and the moon lattice, Julie Shamcey wala lil

00:38:59 --> 00:39:04

Kamara. Do not prostrate yourself to the sun nor to the moon was jus

00:39:04 --> 00:39:10

Lilla. But prostrate yourself to Allah, the One who created them.

00:39:11 --> 00:39:14

So the rejoinder of the polemicists is yeah, the Quran is

00:39:14 --> 00:39:19

against the worship of the moon, but commands the worship of the

00:39:19 --> 00:39:22

moon god. But if you read the Quran, just a second verse of the

00:39:22 --> 00:39:27

Quran Al hamdu Lillahi Rabbil Alameen. Please Praise be to Allah

00:39:27 --> 00:39:31

Rabbul aalameen The Lord of the universe and interestingly, this

00:39:31 --> 00:39:35

is a title that the rabbi's use for God in their writings, Bono

00:39:35 --> 00:39:40

shell Olam, Bono shell Olam, Rabbul aalameen, the God of the

00:39:40 --> 00:39:44

universe. So yes, Allah is the God of the moon. He's the god of the

00:39:44 --> 00:39:46

sun. He's the God of the heavens and the earth. He's the God of

00:39:46 --> 00:39:51

humanity. If you read the Quran, what does Allah say in the Quran

00:39:51 --> 00:39:52

about himself?

00:39:53 --> 00:39:57

I'll spare you the Arabic because I don't want to take so much time

00:39:57 --> 00:39:58

here. I'm running short on time.

00:39:59 --> 00:40:00

God

00:40:00 --> 00:40:03

There is no god but He, He sent down to you oh Mohamed the

00:40:03 --> 00:40:07

revelation in truth confirming what was before it, once Allah

00:40:07 --> 00:40:11

Torah to what injeel. And he sent down or revealed the Torah and the

00:40:11 --> 00:40:16

Gospel. So the cloud of the god of the Quran is the God according to

00:40:16 --> 00:40:20

the Quran, who gave or sent down or revealed the Torah and the

00:40:20 --> 00:40:20

Gospel.

00:40:22 --> 00:40:26

Elsewhere in the Quran, say, oh Mohammed, we believe in Allah in

00:40:26 --> 00:40:29

God and what was revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham,

00:40:30 --> 00:40:34

Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and the tribes, and what Moses and Jesus

00:40:34 --> 00:40:37

were given, and the prophets from their Lord, we don't make

00:40:37 --> 00:40:41

distinctions between them, and we bow down to God, elsewhere in the

00:40:41 --> 00:40:46

Quran. And remember, when the angel said, Oh, Mary, God gives

00:40:46 --> 00:40:49

you glad tidings of a word from him whose name shall be Christ

00:40:49 --> 00:40:53

Jesus, the son of Mary held an honor in this world, and in the

00:40:53 --> 00:40:56

afterlife, and amongst those nearest to God, according to the

00:40:56 --> 00:41:01

Quran, the god of the Quran is the God who sent the angel to marry to

00:41:01 --> 00:41:03

give her glad tidings of the birth of Christ.

00:41:05 --> 00:41:09

If you read 280 to 189 of the Quran, Surah Baqarah surah number

00:41:09 --> 00:41:15

two, verse 189. Yes, Allah I need a hint Allah. They ask you about

00:41:15 --> 00:41:19

the new moons. Right? They're asking you about the the new

00:41:19 --> 00:41:24

moons, the crescent moons, quoted here Milwaukee to the NASCI. While

00:41:24 --> 00:41:28

Hodge they are simply say, oh, Mohamed, they are simply tools for

00:41:28 --> 00:41:33

telling time, and for determining the season of the pilgrimage. And

00:41:33 --> 00:41:38

that's it. And Jews use a lunar calendar. In during the Temple

00:41:38 --> 00:41:41

period, you had servants of the Temple Guard go out to the Mount

00:41:41 --> 00:41:44

of Olives site, the moon and burn fires to let the people know that

00:41:44 --> 00:41:47

it's like the moon. Right. But what's up with the flag of

00:41:47 --> 00:41:48

Pakistan?

00:41:50 --> 00:41:51

So you have this

00:41:52 --> 00:41:53

right?

00:41:54 --> 00:41:59

symbol here. So and I don't mean to pick on Pakistan, there's many.

00:42:00 --> 00:42:03

There's many countries that have this as on their flag. But you

00:42:03 --> 00:42:06

know, this symbol is one of the oldest icons in human history.

00:42:06 --> 00:42:11

It's not Islamic in origin, nor is it exclusive to Islam. The Prophet

00:42:11 --> 00:42:15

Muhammad's flags are solid black and white. There is no symbol that

00:42:15 --> 00:42:19

he associated with Islam. The icon entered Islamic culture via the

00:42:19 --> 00:42:24

Seljuk Turks in the 12th century, and was widely used by their

00:42:24 --> 00:42:28

successors, the Ottomans, many, many Muslim majority countries

00:42:28 --> 00:42:30

adopted the icon.

00:42:31 --> 00:42:36

Okay, now there's another Semitic language called surah. Yeah, yeah.

00:42:36 --> 00:42:41

Or Syriac. Late. It's sometimes called late Aramaic or Christian.

00:42:41 --> 00:42:46

Aramaic is the language of Christ, according to many historians. Now

00:42:46 --> 00:42:49

there's a translation of the New Testament, which is called the

00:42:49 --> 00:42:50

Peshitta.

00:42:51 --> 00:42:54

Which related to the Arabic the Sikh top simple.

00:42:55 --> 00:42:59

This was done in the fourth century. It's a translation of the

00:42:59 --> 00:43:03

Greek manuscripts into Syriac, the language of Christ, replacing

00:43:03 --> 00:43:08

tations, a Diatessaron. That was written in the second century. If

00:43:08 --> 00:43:13

you look in the Peshitta, Mark, chapter one, verse 15, according

00:43:13 --> 00:43:18

to the Peshitta Jesus says, shamanism Na, were Matea

00:43:18 --> 00:43:19

Mallacoota Allah Aha.

00:43:20 --> 00:43:28

He says The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. So

00:43:29 --> 00:43:31

in the way that it's spelled in Syriac

00:43:34 --> 00:43:34

is

00:43:36 --> 00:43:43

Alif Lam ha. Elif, right. And some Syriac grammars, like Brah,

00:43:43 --> 00:43:47

Coleman will, will argue that the first lamb or the Lammott here

00:43:47 --> 00:43:49

should be doubled. So you have

00:43:51 --> 00:43:57

Hola Hola. Hola, ha, this is in Syriac, in the 11th century of the

00:43:57 --> 00:44:02

Common Era, a Christian scholar named even Tayyab he translated

00:44:02 --> 00:44:07

tations Diatessaron from the original Syriac into Arabic and he

00:44:07 --> 00:44:08

translated this word

00:44:10 --> 00:44:12

into Arabic as this Allah

00:44:16 --> 00:44:22

Now what is the trilateral route? What is the meaning of Allah? So

00:44:22 --> 00:44:25

there's there's some opinion about this actually. Let me erase this

00:44:25 --> 00:44:26

666 stuff here.

00:44:28 --> 00:44:33

Somebody takes a picture of it and calls me the Antichrist. Yes. So

00:44:33 --> 00:44:39

one opinion is that the root is la ha, la ha This is from Cebu away a

00:44:39 --> 00:44:41

Persian or Marian anyway.

00:44:42 --> 00:44:47

Inside joke between me and the students. La ha. This This means

00:44:47 --> 00:44:53

to shimmer are to to shine to shimmer. That's the root meaning

00:44:53 --> 00:44:57

of lucha as they be the intangible arrows. He offers this alley ha.

00:44:59 --> 00:44:59

Ali, ha

00:45:00 --> 00:45:05

means to go back and forth in a state of fear and perplexity.

00:45:07 --> 00:45:11

That's what that root meaning is. And this is supported by the BTB

00:45:12 --> 00:45:16

the brown the brown driver Briggs, Hebrew English

00:45:17 --> 00:45:22

lexicon and they give the root as the same letters I left la mud

00:45:22 --> 00:45:24

Hey, hola, hola.

00:45:25 --> 00:45:34

gesenius also gives this one ghoul so Alif Wow lum in the meaning

00:45:34 --> 00:45:40

here is power. This is related to the Arabic Oh Walla Walla, Walla,

00:45:40 --> 00:45:44

unformed to infinitive wheel, has the meaning

00:45:46 --> 00:45:51

of, of mystical exegesis. Right, that's the technical meaning,

00:45:51 --> 00:45:55

linguistically, it means to find the origin of something. So this

00:45:55 --> 00:45:59

idea that God is the ontological origin of or source of all things

00:45:59 --> 00:46:03

that he's mono rk is the first principle of all existence.

00:46:07 --> 00:46:12

Okay, so I want to look at a verse in the Quran.

00:46:14 --> 00:46:15

Really quickly here.

00:46:16 --> 00:46:20

There's a surah. In the Quran, a chapter called loss. It's also

00:46:20 --> 00:46:24

called a SAS, it's called a Tauheed. There's 18 to 22 names,

00:46:24 --> 00:46:27

it's only four verses long. It is the heart of Islamic theology.

00:46:28 --> 00:46:33

Surah 112. Right. So 112 One, this is what looks like

00:46:34 --> 00:46:35

an Arabic

00:46:42 --> 00:46:44

says call who Allah who hadn't?

00:46:46 --> 00:46:50

Right. So call is an imperative to the Prophet. And by extension to

00:46:50 --> 00:46:57

all of us say he is God, one. So grammarians, they try to identify

00:46:57 --> 00:46:59

what's happening here grammatically, say they say who

00:46:59 --> 00:47:04

this is the subject. This is called Muqtada. And here LeFou and

00:47:04 --> 00:47:09

gelada, the expression of excitation. This is the predicate

00:47:09 --> 00:47:11

the hover and then I had, there's an opinion that this is the

00:47:11 --> 00:47:16

permutated and explanatory word of some sort, or that this is a

00:47:16 --> 00:47:17

second predicate.

00:47:19 --> 00:47:23

So hold on to that for a minute. I'll come back to it. Now, in the

00:47:23 --> 00:47:28

Hebrew Bible, in the Tanakh, we have something called the

00:47:28 --> 00:47:29

tetragrammaton.

00:47:31 --> 00:47:36

Right? the tetragrammaton means four letter word. Yard. Hey, Vav.

00:47:36 --> 00:47:42

Hey, yard, hey, Vav Hey. So like, why W?

00:47:44 --> 00:47:46

These four Hebrew letters.

00:47:47 --> 00:47:51

And these letters represent the name of God. No one knows how to

00:47:51 --> 00:47:55

articulate these letters the high priest did on Yom Kippur war.

00:47:56 --> 00:47:59

The early church fathers have conjectured and I apologize for

00:47:59 --> 00:48:03

this. Yeah, way. But this is conjecture. There is something

00:48:05 --> 00:48:08

somewhat similar to this in the Quran. There's some of the

00:48:08 --> 00:48:11

chapters of the Quran at the very beginning. There are these

00:48:11 --> 00:48:14

mysterious disjointed letters as they're called. And if Lam Meem

00:48:15 --> 00:48:20

hammy Yacine ta Cafe are inside. Nobody really knows what these

00:48:20 --> 00:48:23

means. Now, there's some mystical exigence who will conjecture

00:48:23 --> 00:48:27

things but they always say Allahu Allah, God knows. Like a bit. He

00:48:27 --> 00:48:31

was said, Hi, meet him, Ya Habibi, Mohammed. Right? Ha ha one of the

00:48:31 --> 00:48:35

names of the Prophet Yacine Yes, Sayed. Yes, say a Jaffa saw that,

00:48:35 --> 00:48:38

but nobody really knows. Right? Of course Western oriental is

00:48:38 --> 00:48:41

believed these are the initials of the scribes that are really into

00:48:41 --> 00:48:45

writing the Koran. But here's the thing, if you read the Hebrew

00:48:45 --> 00:48:51

Bible, so the Shema, right, the great justification of of Jewish

00:48:51 --> 00:48:55

faith or theology, Deuteronomy six for Shema Israel,

00:48:56 --> 00:48:58

then you have yard Hey vav Hey

00:49:11 --> 00:49:13

so here we have the tetragrammaton. Here we have the

00:49:13 --> 00:49:19

tetragrammaton, right? But Jewish scribes are not allowed to

00:49:19 --> 00:49:23

articulate this. It's the Shem Hama for OSH it's the name that's

00:49:23 --> 00:49:28

not to be articulated. It's Hashem the name the great name. So

00:49:28 --> 00:49:29

instead of saying

00:49:31 --> 00:49:34

Yahweh way or something again, I apologize or something like that.

00:49:34 --> 00:49:36

They will say I don't I

00:49:42 --> 00:49:44

don't I do oops.

00:49:45 --> 00:49:50

I don't know what the comments here right? I don't I ELO Hey, no,

00:49:50 --> 00:49:55

I don't I hard Adonai Eloheinu Adonai. Interestingly, in the

00:49:55 --> 00:50:00

Gospel of Mark, and Jewish scribe comes to Christ. And he says what

00:50:00 --> 00:50:03

is a greatest commandment. And Mark has him say, quote The

00:50:03 --> 00:50:07

Septuagint right the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible

00:50:07 --> 00:50:12

Akua. You said I am here Israel kudos Hafez Heyman, quote, EOS

00:50:12 --> 00:50:18

haste estin here, O Israel, the LORD our God, the Lord is one. So

00:50:19 --> 00:50:20

the Hebrew

00:50:21 --> 00:50:23

and erase this part here.

00:50:24 --> 00:50:29

The Hebrew word, the Hebrew tetragrammaton yd haev off, hey,

00:50:29 --> 00:50:30

it's translated

00:50:31 --> 00:50:32

oops

00:50:36 --> 00:50:37

is translated

00:50:40 --> 00:50:43

as kudos in Greek

00:50:46 --> 00:50:52

kudos in the LXX in the Greek Septuagint, as well as the New

00:50:52 --> 00:50:55

Testament. But here's the thing about the Greek kudos. Kudos can

00:50:55 --> 00:51:01

also mean teacher or rabbi, or master in fact, in the Gospel of

00:51:01 --> 00:51:06

John Philip is called kudos. So while the tetragrammaton only

00:51:06 --> 00:51:11

refers to God, kudos can actually refer to human beings as well.

00:51:15 --> 00:51:16

And then Elohim

00:51:19 --> 00:51:27

Elohim is rendered half Baos in Greek ha fails

00:51:28 --> 00:51:34

with the definite article, right? But the word fails

00:51:35 --> 00:51:36

without the definite article,

00:51:38 --> 00:51:43

right? Northcrest or Nikita? Indefinite is also used for non

00:51:43 --> 00:51:49

deities. Right? I would argue that, you know, because John, the

00:51:49 --> 00:51:53

Gospel of John calls Jesus famous without the definite article,

00:51:53 --> 00:51:57

Jesus has not called Hot chaos in any gospel. He's called famous.

00:51:57 --> 00:52:03

Interestingly, Philo obviously, not a biblical writer, but Philo,

00:52:03 --> 00:52:06

in the life of Moses, a contemporary of the Gospel of

00:52:06 --> 00:52:14

John, he calls Moses face EOS. Right. Paul calls Satan, Fayyaz,

00:52:14 --> 00:52:18

the god of this world. So non deities, I'll come back to this

00:52:18 --> 00:52:22

idea. But if we look at the tetragrammaton here,

00:52:24 --> 00:52:25

your table of hey,

00:52:26 --> 00:52:29

my contention is that it's probably derived from

00:52:31 --> 00:52:37

this very archaic verb Hava have our means to be

00:52:38 --> 00:52:44

to be. So then this looks like it's the if we add vowels, it

00:52:44 --> 00:52:49

looks like it's the imperfect tense. Yeah, there. Yeah, there,

00:52:49 --> 00:52:54

which means he is or he will be right.

00:52:56 --> 00:52:56

Now,

00:52:58 --> 00:53:03

the Arabic cognate, to hover, according to gesenius is how we

00:53:04 --> 00:53:08

are how we are, however, meaning to breathe, how we are meaning to

00:53:08 --> 00:53:13

love or to desire or to will. This idea that God is the breath of

00:53:13 --> 00:53:19

existence, he will to create out of a demonstration of His love. So

00:53:20 --> 00:53:23

yeah, yeah. So here we have the

00:53:24 --> 00:53:31

prominent letters. Hey, in volve. Interestingly, in other places in

00:53:31 --> 00:53:32

the Hebrew Bible,

00:53:33 --> 00:53:38

a shorter form of the tetragrammaton is used with only

00:53:38 --> 00:53:39

these two letters

00:53:41 --> 00:53:44

as either whole, or who.

00:53:46 --> 00:53:48

So like the Hebrew name of Jesus

00:53:53 --> 00:53:56

translated Jeshua

00:53:58 --> 00:53:59

Yahoshua

00:54:01 --> 00:54:07

Yahoshua Jeshua, which is rendered in the Greek as none other than EA

00:54:07 --> 00:54:09

Seuss, which is what Jesus has called the New Testament.

00:54:11 --> 00:54:16

The meaning of this according to gesenius is saved by hole.

00:54:17 --> 00:54:21

Hole, right, the name of one of the names of God, a shortened form

00:54:22 --> 00:54:25

of the tetragrammaton and of course, I wrote these two letters

00:54:26 --> 00:54:27

in Arabic.

00:54:28 --> 00:54:32

You get this Ha, wow. Hua

00:54:33 --> 00:54:34

Hua,

00:54:35 --> 00:54:42

to come back to this idea. Now, as I said, Hava is very old. There's

00:54:42 --> 00:54:45

a later form of the verb to be that's attested in the Hebrew

00:54:45 --> 00:54:50

Bible as well. Which is Hi yah, with the Yoda in the middle. Hi,

00:54:50 --> 00:54:54

yah. Hi Yah, so Hava Hi yah.

00:54:56 --> 00:54:57

And

00:55:01 --> 00:55:04

The third masculine singular present tense

00:55:07 --> 00:55:13

would be Yeah, yeah. Which means he is or will be. Now, if I wanted

00:55:13 --> 00:55:18

to change this to first common singular, what would I have to

00:55:18 --> 00:55:24

change is the same in Arabic. So if this is your Kuno yaku he will

00:55:24 --> 00:55:26

be how do I say I will be?

00:55:27 --> 00:55:28

Huh?

00:55:29 --> 00:55:30

Okay.

00:55:31 --> 00:55:37

Cool. No, I have to change the prefix right. To what

00:55:39 --> 00:55:39

and Elif

00:55:41 --> 00:55:42

and Elif.

00:55:43 --> 00:55:45

Yay, I am

00:55:47 --> 00:55:54

a Yay. I am I will be. Now if you look at Exodus 314 In the Torah,

00:55:55 --> 00:55:58

Moses at the burning bush, he's speaking to God and He says, you

00:55:58 --> 00:56:00

know, when I go back to the Israelites, they're gonna ask me,

00:56:01 --> 00:56:06

What is your name? What do I say? And God says to him, tell them

00:56:06 --> 00:56:14

hey, Asha AE, I am who I am. I will be who I will be. Now this

00:56:14 --> 00:56:18

was translated in the Septuagint as a goal

00:56:19 --> 00:56:20

AMI

00:56:21 --> 00:56:22

Hold on.

00:56:25 --> 00:56:29

The Septuagint translated to 50 before the Common Era, by 70 Greek

00:56:29 --> 00:56:36

speaking Hebrew scholars, they translated a Asha AE as a goal a

00:56:36 --> 00:56:37

me a goal.

00:56:39 --> 00:56:44

How do you write an English Ami? Hold on?

00:56:45 --> 00:56:47

Yes, so here we have

00:56:48 --> 00:56:52

a goal is the subject AMI is the copula to verb the linking verb

00:56:52 --> 00:56:57

our predicate is Hold on, this is our predicate. Our predicate Hold

00:56:57 --> 00:57:02

on This is the masculine definite article in the present active

00:57:03 --> 00:57:10

participle on right. Like the word ontology is related to this. I am

00:57:10 --> 00:57:15

the one who is that's how they understood it. I am the one who is

00:57:15 --> 00:57:19

the one whose existence is absolutely necessary. The only non

00:57:19 --> 00:57:24

contingent being watchable would include the monarch the first

00:57:24 --> 00:57:27

cause of all, so for Philo,

00:57:29 --> 00:57:34

for Philo, hold on is the name of God. In Greek, this is the

00:57:34 --> 00:57:42

equivalent, right? Of the Hashem who on the one who is he calls

00:57:42 --> 00:57:43

Moses they OS

00:57:44 --> 00:57:45

right? Say OS

00:57:47 --> 00:57:54

which means a god. But Philo is not a polytheist. Right? What does

00:57:54 --> 00:58:00

he mean by that? He means a Moses is a sanctified, divine agent of

00:58:00 --> 00:58:05

God in union with God, a divine with a lowercase d. That's how

00:58:05 --> 00:58:09

he's using it. Now for John, the Gospel of John. My contention is

00:58:09 --> 00:58:14

my dissertation work was on the Gospel of John files contemporary.

00:58:15 --> 00:58:20

The father is Hans AOSS. The father is half a author with a

00:58:20 --> 00:58:25

definite article, and Jesus is called theists. But I would also

00:58:25 --> 00:58:29

contend that the way that John is using, I'm doing a lot of pure

00:58:29 --> 00:58:33

wetter, the way that John is using Fayol is not so dissimilar as to

00:58:33 --> 00:58:39

how Philo is calling Moses, Say us, that Jesus that Christ is a

00:58:39 --> 00:58:44

sanctified divine agent of God and mystical union with God. Now, if

00:58:44 --> 00:58:48

you look at and Jesus's in the sun, or Jesus, or Christ is never

00:58:48 --> 00:58:51

called half AOSS anywhere in the four gospels. Right now, if you

00:58:51 --> 00:58:55

look at the end of the prologue, John 118. John 118

00:58:57 --> 00:59:02

is a beautiful verse. It says no one has at any time seen God.

00:59:04 --> 00:59:09

No one has at any time seen God, but the mono

00:59:10 --> 00:59:11

game as

00:59:12 --> 00:59:13

fate EOS

00:59:15 --> 00:59:16

Alright, so mono

00:59:18 --> 00:59:23

kinase, Fe OS. Sometimes this is erroneously translate, I would say

00:59:23 --> 00:59:28

it's erroneously translated as the only begotten God. Sometimes this

00:59:28 --> 00:59:32

word says we OS in Greek, the only begotten Son, but se os is

00:59:32 --> 00:59:38

actually better attested in the manuscripts. So the the Codex

00:59:38 --> 00:59:43

Vaticanus, which will teach about love so much, the Codex Sinaiticus

00:59:43 --> 00:59:48

and p 66. Nestle aland 27th edition UBS fourth edition, they

00:59:48 --> 00:59:53

all took mono again as they EOS mono Guinness, one of a kind

00:59:53 --> 00:59:59

divinized agent of God. No one has at any time, seen God

01:00:00 --> 01:00:06

But a very uniquely divinized lowercase d, Agent of God who is

01:00:06 --> 01:00:11

in the calapan to Theo Kalpana to path through who is in the bosom

01:00:11 --> 01:00:15

of the Father in the heart of the Father. That is to say, who is

01:00:15 --> 01:00:19

beloved to the Father XA gay Sato EXA. G Tim

01:00:21 --> 01:00:24

speaks about him, makes you familiar with him gives you

01:00:24 --> 01:00:28

mattify of him, the highest type of knowledge is Dattilo him

01:00:28 --> 01:00:33

modified to Allah. Jesus quotes Hosea and Matthew Keith, that's

01:00:33 --> 01:00:39

the facet veloza But that Elohim May Allah I require said mercy

01:00:39 --> 01:00:43

love not sacrifice and the knowledge of God dot Elohim Mati

01:00:43 --> 01:00:46

Fatah Allah more than burn offerings

01:00:49 --> 01:00:50

now John 1030

01:00:52 --> 01:00:54

Jesus says egg okay hot potato Hain Essman

01:00:56 --> 01:01:01

he says I and the Father are one. This very interesting passage

01:01:01 --> 01:01:05

here. No my favorite passages. So the Pharisees the pickup stones.

01:01:05 --> 01:01:08

And so why you stoning me for which work that I've shown you

01:01:08 --> 01:01:10

from the fathers and not for my work is because you're of

01:01:10 --> 01:01:14

blasphemy, you're claiming to be God, Jesus's response very

01:01:14 --> 01:01:17

interesting here. He says, does it not say in your scripture I said

01:01:17 --> 01:01:23

you are Gods all sons of the Most High. quoting Psalm 82. Six,

01:01:23 --> 01:01:29

doesn't it say in your scripture? A low him at Tim, you are Elohim.

01:01:30 --> 01:01:33

God calls the judges who are prophetic figures in the Old

01:01:33 --> 01:01:39

Testament in the Tanakh gods for B'nai la Yan, cool, let him all of

01:01:39 --> 01:01:43

you are sons of the Most High says yet you say of the one whom the

01:01:43 --> 01:01:48

Father sanctified and sent into the world, you blaspheme, because

01:01:48 --> 01:01:52

I said, I am the Son of God. Right? So the point here is an Old

01:01:52 --> 01:01:57

Testament, human beings in the Tanakh, human beings, as well as

01:01:57 --> 01:01:59

God are called Gods.

01:02:00 --> 01:02:06

In Exodus seven one, right, I will send you God speaking to Moses, I

01:02:06 --> 01:02:11

will send you as Elohim unto pada o to Pharaoh, and Aaron as your

01:02:11 --> 01:02:16

prophet, doesn't mean, Moses is literally God but a representative

01:02:16 --> 01:02:19

of God, a divine agent, one who speaks with the authority of God

01:02:20 --> 01:02:23

on who acts with the authority of God. This type of mystical union

01:02:23 --> 01:02:29

that I believe is in the Quran, my UGR Rasool, Allah, Allah, whoever

01:02:29 --> 01:02:33

obeys the messenger is obeying God. Why? Because they're the same

01:02:33 --> 01:02:37

note because the messenger speaks with the authority of God. And

01:02:37 --> 01:02:42

disobedience of him is as is the same as disobedience to God. And

01:02:42 --> 01:02:46

interestingly, the rabbi's also referred to God as Father, this is

01:02:46 --> 01:02:49

a Hebrew Hizam Isaiah 64 Eight.

01:02:50 --> 01:02:51

They say,

01:02:52 --> 01:02:58

at Adonai a vino. You are the Lord our father. I would contend that

01:02:58 --> 01:02:59

this idea

01:03:00 --> 01:03:05

right in in biblical text of God being a father, an OB, is

01:03:05 --> 01:03:08

confirmed the concept of it, I would contend is confirmed in the

01:03:08 --> 01:03:14

Quran without using the language of father that rub the word Rob in

01:03:14 --> 01:03:17

the Quran is equivalent to how I believe the Bible is using Old and

01:03:17 --> 01:03:21

New Testament. How the Bible is using father, who is your rub.

01:03:22 --> 01:03:25

Your rub is the one who brings you up, raises you up takes care of

01:03:25 --> 01:03:29

you, takes you takes care of you raises you up in stages. This is

01:03:29 --> 01:03:35

the meaning of rub. It denotes God's eminence, his Korb right

01:03:35 --> 01:03:37

that's what we pray in the Quran. There's a there's a there's a

01:03:37 --> 01:03:41

supplication that God teaches us to say in the Quran to about our

01:03:41 --> 01:03:41

parents.

01:03:43 --> 01:03:49

It ham Houma have mercy on them Come on Rob by Yanni Savera. As

01:03:49 --> 01:03:54

they raised me up in childhood, as they raised me up in childhood, or

01:03:54 --> 01:03:58

up by Jani, Sophia Saphira. So look at these major prophets of

01:03:58 --> 01:04:03

God, the Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet Jesus, the prophet Moses,

01:04:03 --> 01:04:07

the Prophet Abraham, none of these great prophetic figures had their,

01:04:07 --> 01:04:12

their biological fathers in their lives. They have what's known as

01:04:12 --> 01:04:17

tarbiyah, rub Baniya they have a lordly upbringing. It's only in

01:04:17 --> 01:04:24

this, this majaz this figurative way that these are quote unquote

01:04:24 --> 01:04:28

sons of God. I think that's how the Bible is using the term.

01:04:28 --> 01:04:29

Interestingly,

01:04:30 --> 01:04:31

if you

01:04:35 --> 01:04:40

and also the Rabbi say, a vino Shiva shamayim. They mentioned Our

01:04:40 --> 01:04:42

Father who art in heaven.

01:04:43 --> 01:04:47

This is a Hebrew ism, it's found in rabbinical literature, of wound

01:04:47 --> 01:04:50

of Ishmael Christ says, and especially to our Father who art

01:04:50 --> 01:04:56

in heaven. Also the phrase Son of God is a Hebrew ism. A son in the

01:04:56 --> 01:04:59

Jewish context, is a servant of God par excellence.

01:05:00 --> 01:05:05

In the Torah, Israel is my son, even my firstborn. God says to

01:05:05 --> 01:05:08

David in the Psalms, you are my son this day I have begotten you.

01:05:09 --> 01:05:14

Paul says in Romans four as many as are led by the Spirit of God,

01:05:14 --> 01:05:19

these are the boy to fail. These are the sons or children of God.

01:05:20 --> 01:05:23

It says in the prologue, Jesus gave them authority to be taken

01:05:23 --> 01:05:28

out to throw you, children of God. Interestingly, the Quran quotes

01:05:28 --> 01:05:33

Jesus the Quran says here so that Imran never would someone that God

01:05:33 --> 01:05:37

gave the prophetic office, say to humanity Coonoor a bad day Leeming

01:05:37 --> 01:05:41

doing Allah, they would never say humanity be my worshipers other

01:05:41 --> 01:05:49

than God. Well, I can Qunu Rabbani Yin, but be lordly Rabbani Yean,

01:05:49 --> 01:05:55

be lordly be reflections of God, your rub rub is equivalent to

01:05:55 --> 01:06:00

Father up in the Bible. Someone who has Rabbani is quote unquote,

01:06:00 --> 01:06:04

a child of God. That's how the term is used, I believe in

01:06:04 --> 01:06:09

biblical text. And in John the phrase, the Son of God, who used

01:06:09 --> 01:06:14

to fail, I would say is clearly a messianic title, a uniquely

01:06:14 --> 01:06:16

divinized son.

01:06:17 --> 01:06:22

Now, according to the Mishnah, the Shem, Hama frosh, the

01:06:22 --> 01:06:25

tetragrammaton was only articulated in the temple, the

01:06:25 --> 01:06:31

Beit Mikdash by the haka Hain Hagadol, the high priest, and it

01:06:31 --> 01:06:35

was believed to be the most exalted name of God, the actual

01:06:35 --> 01:06:39

name of his essence, right in distinction to Elohim which

01:06:39 --> 01:06:44

indicates is essence Allah, Allah Moon Allah that right, a proper

01:06:44 --> 01:06:49

name indicating the essence, Imam followed in a Razzie, one of the

01:06:49 --> 01:06:53

great exegesis and philosophers in our tradition. He said that the

01:06:53 --> 01:06:57

IsaMill of them the greatest name of God, is this.

01:06:59 --> 01:06:59

Hua

01:07:01 --> 01:07:01

Hua

01:07:03 --> 01:07:08

right, containing the prominent letters of the tetragrammaton

01:07:09 --> 01:07:14

the Hey, with a Ha, in the Wow, the very name of God's essence,

01:07:15 --> 01:07:16

even Oribi the great master

01:07:18 --> 01:07:21

he said, Ha hoot.

01:07:25 --> 01:07:26

Ha hoot.

01:07:28 --> 01:07:32

So here we have the prominent letters. Hua. The Rabbi's also

01:07:32 --> 01:07:34

mentioned Ma

01:07:37 --> 01:07:43

Ma hoot. With the prominent letters Hey, involve

01:07:48 --> 01:07:53

so I would contend then, back to this here, all who Allahu Ahad

01:07:55 --> 01:07:59

I would contend that what's happening here because if you look

01:07:59 --> 01:08:01

at the ASVAB and Newzoo, if you look at the occasion of this

01:08:02 --> 01:08:05

Surahs revelation, like you look at Anwar ad, for example, he gives

01:08:05 --> 01:08:10

two occasions once in Mecca where polytheists are asking the Prophet

01:08:10 --> 01:08:15

about God once in Medina when Jews are asking about God when Jews so

01:08:15 --> 01:08:22

the response come say Hua is God I had, who? I would say, God, hey,

01:08:23 --> 01:08:27

Vav Hey, is a confirmation of the tetragrammaton who was the name of

01:08:27 --> 01:08:31

his essence, the greatest name? Who and then Allah is equivalent

01:08:31 --> 01:08:32

to

01:08:34 --> 01:08:41

eloheinu and if this is a second predicate, right as CLT says, then

01:08:41 --> 01:08:45

you have this parenthetical yard Hey, vave again, who are

01:08:48 --> 01:08:49

a hard

01:08:50 --> 01:08:56

Adonai Eloheinu Adonai Johan who Allah who had a perfect

01:08:56 --> 01:09:01

confirmation, of the principle, theological teaching of the Torah,

01:09:03 --> 01:09:09

want to end with this? What is the personality of this God of Allah?

01:09:10 --> 01:09:14

According to the Quran, according to Islam? What is the overarching

01:09:14 --> 01:09:21

personality trait of this god? 113 out of 114 Sutras of the Quran,

01:09:22 --> 01:09:27

begin with this concept oratory formula the sacred formula

01:09:27 --> 01:09:32

Bismillah R Rahman r Rahim. Right. This called the best smeller

01:09:32 --> 01:09:36

Bismillah R Rahman r Rahim in the name of God or rough man, the

01:09:36 --> 01:09:43

indiscriminately compassionate, or Rahim, the intimately loving. A

01:09:43 --> 01:09:46

rough man is also mentioned in rabbinical literature. Ha ha man,

01:09:46 --> 01:09:51

ha ha man. And this word is actually related to the word that

01:09:51 --> 01:09:56

I am Russian ROM in Arabic and Hebrew, which is the womb of a

01:09:56 --> 01:09:56

mother.

01:09:57 --> 01:10:00

Right? There's a hadith of the poor

01:10:00 --> 01:10:02

If it was mentioned in different books, we also saw leafing Imam

01:10:02 --> 01:10:06

nawawi, where the prophet was outside standing with some of his

01:10:06 --> 01:10:08

companions and a woman came running out of her house and she

01:10:08 --> 01:10:12

was totally hysterical. And said, What's the matter? I lost my son.

01:10:12 --> 01:10:17

My son is barely able to walk. Where's my son? Look for her son.

01:10:17 --> 01:10:20

She's absolutely hysterical. They find her son, right? They give the

01:10:20 --> 01:10:24

give her son to her. She takes her son hugs kisses and breastfeed

01:10:24 --> 01:10:28

him. Right? The Prophet said to his companions that are there. Can

01:10:28 --> 01:10:33

you imagine this woman taking her son and throwing him into a fire?

01:10:34 --> 01:10:39

Can you imagine that? They said, la Wallahi by God, we can't. And

01:10:39 --> 01:10:43

he said Allah who are humblebee everybody he mean had the heebie

01:10:43 --> 01:10:51

Wallah De ha. God, Allah Elohim is more merciful to His servants than

01:10:51 --> 01:10:53

this woman is to her son.

01:10:55 --> 01:10:58

Children are taught what's known as the hadith of Rama. In

01:10:58 --> 01:11:01

traditional curricula children five years old. This is the first

01:11:01 --> 01:11:04

Hadith they learn the first statement of the Prophet Muhammad

01:11:04 --> 01:11:08

they learned is called the Hadith the tradition of compassion. Or

01:11:08 --> 01:11:11

Rafi Munna Your humble Homer Rahman era hammelmann Fill out

01:11:11 --> 01:11:13

your hammock command for sama moose, not Achmed.

01:11:14 --> 01:11:19

The most compassionate shows compassion to those who show

01:11:19 --> 01:11:22

compassion, show compassion to those on earth and the one in

01:11:22 --> 01:11:25

heaven will show you compassion, compassion, compassion,

01:11:25 --> 01:11:29

compassion, compassion, compassion Bahama. This was chosen by

01:11:29 --> 01:11:33

traditional aroma scholars as the first Hadith to teach children to

01:11:33 --> 01:11:36

drill into their minds. That compassion is a great, great

01:11:36 --> 01:11:42

virtue, that this is the greatest virtue in the Islamic tradition.

01:11:44 --> 01:11:47

The Quran says what Amati what's the adequate Lashay my compassion

01:11:47 --> 01:11:53

covers everything. Some of the names of God, I look for the most

01:11:53 --> 01:11:59

forgiving I love dude, the most loving, A salaam peace. My monitor

01:11:59 --> 01:12:02

is also confirmed has Shalom. One of the names of God is has Shalom

01:12:02 --> 01:12:05

he says in missional Torah. He says it's forbidden to use this

01:12:05 --> 01:12:08

word as a greeting if you're in a bathhouse, because it's one of the

01:12:08 --> 01:12:09

names of God.

01:12:10 --> 01:12:14

The famous hadith of Sandman, the person

01:12:15 --> 01:12:19

who said that the Prophet Muhammad said God divided his mercy into

01:12:19 --> 01:12:24

100 equal parts. He took one part out of 101% and he put it in

01:12:24 --> 01:12:29

creation. And it's through. Its through this one part of His

01:12:29 --> 01:12:33

mercy, that all of creation shows compassion towards one another.

01:12:33 --> 01:12:37

And he's reserved 99 parts of his mercy for the Yama Yama, Yama,

01:12:37 --> 01:12:40

Dean Yom had Dean the Day of Judgment.

01:12:43 --> 01:12:47

The Prophet said, lead Ted, hello, Jana, to Hatha Tumino wala took me

01:12:47 --> 01:12:52

know how to have boo. None of you will enter paradise until you

01:12:52 --> 01:12:55

truly believe and none of you will truly believe until you love one

01:12:55 --> 01:12:59

another. Love one another. Somebody I quoted this one time

01:12:59 --> 01:13:04

and somebody said yeah, that's, that's John 15. Right? Yeah. There

01:13:04 --> 01:13:06

was something like that. And John 15, but I'm quoting from the

01:13:06 --> 01:13:09

Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. Oh, really? He said, done.

01:13:09 --> 01:13:13

Yeah. And then he said, Shall I tell you of something that if you

01:13:13 --> 01:13:17

do it, it will increase love? And they said yes. So I've sure Salama

01:13:17 --> 01:13:19

Boehner. Come spread peace amongst yourselves.

01:13:20 --> 01:13:23

Let me know I had to come after you. Hey, buddy. Happy May you

01:13:23 --> 01:13:26

rebel enough, see, oh, come akala here salatu wa sallam. He also

01:13:26 --> 01:13:30

said these are rigorously authenticated traditions. None of

01:13:30 --> 01:13:35

you truly believe until he loves for his brother what he loves for

01:13:35 --> 01:13:39

himself. And then one of the companions said while I love my

01:13:39 --> 01:13:44

there's my brother. I love him. I love him. And he said the Prophet

01:13:44 --> 01:13:48

said no, I don't mean your Muslim brother. And your I mean your

01:13:48 --> 01:13:51

brother or sister because the masculine gender encapsulates the

01:13:51 --> 01:13:57

fifth female gender, brother or sister in Benny Adam, in the

01:13:57 --> 01:14:00

Children of Adam, in humanity.

01:14:01 --> 01:14:01

Alright.

01:14:05 --> 01:14:09

So I'll end with this, I promise. The heart of the Abrahamic

01:14:09 --> 01:14:09

tradition

01:14:11 --> 01:14:15

is summed up by Rabbi Hillel in the second century is Deuteronomy

01:14:15 --> 01:14:20

six four, which is this, the next verse six, five, live Leviticus

01:14:20 --> 01:14:23

1918 Schmeisser, Dona Elhanan,

01:14:24 --> 01:14:29

there are Haftar at Adonai ILAHA Bikol Lavaca over coldenhoff shefa

01:14:29 --> 01:14:32

will be called may or DACA. Here Israel the Lord our God the Lord

01:14:32 --> 01:14:35

is one and you shall love the Lord thy God, with all thy heart, soul

01:14:35 --> 01:14:37

and strength and love your neighbor as yourself neighbor

01:14:37 --> 01:14:41

means your fellow man in the generic sense. Jesus confirms

01:14:41 --> 01:14:45

this. In that passage, and Mark no other commandment is greater than

01:14:45 --> 01:14:49

these to follow Dino Rossi. He said. They asked him What is

01:14:49 --> 01:14:53

Islam? Because they asked Rabbi Hillel, what is the torah and he

01:14:53 --> 01:14:55

quoted these three verses. He said everything else is commentary.

01:14:56 --> 01:14:59

What is Islam? Right? Rossi said I

01:15:00 --> 01:15:00

Islam

01:15:02 --> 01:15:04

and a banda to lil Holic Warahmatullah

01:15:05 --> 01:15:08

is worship of the Creator and showing compassion towards his

01:15:08 --> 01:15:09

creation.

01:15:10 --> 01:15:16

This is the personality of Allah subhanaw taala, as I understand

01:15:16 --> 01:15:19

it, and the vast, vast majority of Muslims understand it in the

01:15:19 --> 01:15:23

Quran. Thank you very much for patience. We'll take some

01:15:23 --> 01:15:25

questions. I guess it's and I'm on a camera what

01:15:34 --> 01:15:37

you meant when you mentioned the personality of God had made me

01:15:37 --> 01:15:40

think a little bit about the controversy that happened recently

01:15:40 --> 01:15:43

that I thought you might work into your thought, but you didn't,

01:15:43 --> 01:15:45

which is the Wheaton College controversy,

01:15:47 --> 01:15:51

which also touched upon, is it the same God? And there was the issue

01:15:51 --> 01:15:55

of the Trinity and stuff. So can you give us a quick take your take

01:15:55 --> 01:15:59

on that controversy? And what that would? Yeah. How you would address

01:15:59 --> 01:16:03

that? Yeah, so it's a difficult question. Do Muslims and

01:16:03 --> 01:16:06

Christians worship the same God? Again, in principle, she's talking

01:16:06 --> 01:16:10

about us if you're talking about Dr. Hawkins, right. at Wheaton

01:16:10 --> 01:16:13

College, he was terminated from her position because she dared to

01:16:13 --> 01:16:17

say Muslims and Christians worship the same God. I would say yes,

01:16:17 --> 01:16:19

they do worship the same God. In principle that is the same God.

01:16:20 --> 01:16:23

But there are differences in theology, obviously. So Muslims

01:16:23 --> 01:16:27

don't believe in the Trinity. Right? At least how the vast

01:16:27 --> 01:16:30

majority of Muslims read the Quran, there is a

01:16:31 --> 01:16:36

a polemical aspect when it comes to Orthodox Christian theology.

01:16:37 --> 01:16:41

For example, in Surah, four verse 171, well, that's a Kulu Thalassa

01:16:41 --> 01:16:46

don't say three until later lakum desist, it is better for you. In

01:16:46 --> 01:16:51

them, Allahu Allahu Anhu ahead, for your God is one God. And

01:16:51 --> 01:16:53

interestingly, here in this verse, the word wide is used and not I

01:16:53 --> 01:16:58

had, I would contend why it denotes God's internal oneness,

01:16:58 --> 01:17:02

that he's one person. He's a simple unity, right? Because

01:17:02 --> 01:17:05

Christians don't believe in three gods. They believe in three

01:17:05 --> 01:17:11

persons of God. Right? So it's Trinitarian mono theism, whereas

01:17:11 --> 01:17:15

Islam can be described as Unitarian monotheism. Right? So

01:17:15 --> 01:17:18

there are definitely differences in how we theologizing and this

01:17:18 --> 01:17:20

was also the point of many of the early church fathers,

01:17:22 --> 01:17:26

Contra Marcion, who is saying that it's a different God. And we see

01:17:26 --> 01:17:29

that paradigm now the paradigm has shifted our elements within

01:17:29 --> 01:17:32

evangelical Christians, that type of persuasion, who are

01:17:32 --> 01:17:35

perpetuating this idea that Muslims worship a completely

01:17:35 --> 01:17:39

different God, and it's not the different God. So people, if they

01:17:39 --> 01:17:42

do talk to Muslims, open the Quran, it's very clear that

01:17:42 --> 01:17:46

Muslims worship the God of Abraham. Right? Yes, there are

01:17:46 --> 01:17:50

differences in theology. That's true. But you know, our theology

01:17:50 --> 01:17:53

is very close to Jewish theology. And I wonder how many of these

01:17:53 --> 01:17:57

same evangelicals will say that about the Jews, they worship a

01:17:57 --> 01:17:58

different god? Right.

01:18:00 --> 01:18:06

So, you know, obviously, if there needs to be clarification, if by

01:18:06 --> 01:18:12

God You mean the father, right, how fast the god, Rob, Rob will

01:18:12 --> 01:18:17

Alameen Yes. But if by God, you mean, you mean Jesus, the No, we

01:18:17 --> 01:18:20

don't worship Jesus. Right? We don't worship Jesus. But

01:18:20 --> 01:18:24

Christians are saying very clearly that Jesus is the God of Abraham.

01:18:24 --> 01:18:26

So it is the same garden in principle.

01:18:28 --> 01:18:31

Questions, you want to go up to the microphone, it's over on the

01:18:31 --> 01:18:32

side in the front.

01:18:34 --> 01:18:34

Thank you.

01:18:39 --> 01:18:44

Dr. Ali. Thank you. So I appreciate it. And I very much

01:18:44 --> 01:18:49

enjoy your argument. But there's a counter argument as well. And the

01:18:49 --> 01:18:53

counter argument, of course, is most I would say,

01:18:54 --> 01:18:58

Christian theologians wouldn't agree with your take on even

01:18:58 --> 01:19:00

interpretations. So for example, the

01:19:02 --> 01:19:07

the Council of Nicaea, right? Looked at their dressings, even

01:19:07 --> 01:19:10

like the issue, what's the Son of God? And they clearly said this,

01:19:10 --> 01:19:15

Jesus exists. And he's got to say, I believe that their idea was that

01:19:17 --> 01:19:23

the Son of God actually can exist, and the interpretations should say

01:19:23 --> 01:19:26

exactly that. I think that's what was the result? You sort of

01:19:26 --> 01:19:31

develop the argument that if we examine the language differently,

01:19:31 --> 01:19:34

we can have a different take? And I think in some instances, yes,

01:19:34 --> 01:19:37

you're correct. But in some instances, you still go up against

01:19:37 --> 01:19:41

that trend of the argument that that insists just the opposite.

01:19:41 --> 01:19:43

Yeah, I would, I would agree with you. I would say that there's

01:19:43 --> 01:19:46

different ways of reading these texts. I would contend that

01:19:46 --> 01:19:50

there's a there's a way of reading even John's Gospel with his high

01:19:50 --> 01:19:55

Christology. You know, it's skyscraping theology, as some have

01:19:55 --> 01:19:57

described it in Christology. There's a way of reading those

01:19:57 --> 01:19:59

texts through an Islamic lens

01:20:00 --> 01:20:03

We can actually confirm the entire text. And I think it's doing it

01:20:03 --> 01:20:07

through the lens of what I call Islamic field mysticism. Looking

01:20:07 --> 01:20:11

at these, looking at these texts, through through the lens of

01:20:11 --> 01:20:16

Tawheed, through the lens of Islamic spirituality, obviously,

01:20:16 --> 01:20:17

you know,

01:20:18 --> 01:20:21

most of the early church fathers or if not all of them,

01:20:23 --> 01:20:26

certainly after Nicaea, they would read, you know, before Abraham was

01:20:26 --> 01:20:29

I AM, and to hear Jesus claiming to be the I Am, he's claiming to

01:20:29 --> 01:20:35

be what God told Moses at the burning bush. Yes, I realized that

01:20:35 --> 01:20:39

that is a standard way of interpreting the text. But I would

01:20:39 --> 01:20:41

challenge that and say there's a different way of reading the text.

01:20:41 --> 01:20:45

Right? If you look at the Greek of that verse 858, of John, print

01:20:45 --> 01:20:52

Abraham goodness, Tiago, me, right? So, in Exodus Eggo, me Hold

01:20:52 --> 01:20:56

on, hold on, is the divine aspect a Go me doesn't mean anything, it

01:20:56 --> 01:21:01

just means I am I can say I am me it right, the whole on the

01:21:01 --> 01:21:05

predicate, that's the claim to divinity. So, Jesus is I am, so if

01:21:05 --> 01:21:09

you just have I am, I am you need to supply a predicate or else the

01:21:09 --> 01:21:13

sentence is incomplete. So, you have to supply he I am He, in

01:21:13 --> 01:21:17

order for sentence to be coherent. I am who? Well, I think all of

01:21:17 --> 01:21:19

these I am statements and John should be governed or should be

01:21:19 --> 01:21:22

delimited. By the first I am statement, which is in John For

01:21:22 --> 01:21:26

the woman at the well, who asked Jesus I who says to Jesus, I know

01:21:26 --> 01:21:28

Messiah is coming. And when He comes, he's gonna tell us all

01:21:28 --> 01:21:31

thing. He just says, ergo me.

01:21:32 --> 01:21:36

I am he, I am the Messiah. So there's different ways of reading

01:21:36 --> 01:21:41

these texts. There's different Christians, who were Unitarians

01:21:41 --> 01:21:44

who revered the Gospel of John. Right, who didn't believe that

01:21:44 --> 01:21:48

Jesus was God. You know, whatever. The Aryans believed it's hard to

01:21:48 --> 01:21:53

get a firm grasp because most of what we have from about Arias

01:21:53 --> 01:21:56

Arianism is written by proto orthodox authorities who were

01:21:56 --> 01:22:00

writing, you know, refutations of it. But it appears as if the

01:22:00 --> 01:22:02

Aryans at least did not believe that the son was equal to the

01:22:02 --> 01:22:08

Father. No doubt they revered the Gospel of John. Right. So on that

01:22:08 --> 01:22:12

part, and John, as well mentioned set in the word there was in the

01:22:12 --> 01:22:16

beginning, there was the word the word was with God, and the Word

01:22:17 --> 01:22:21

was God, were you. Do you make the same argument? Yeah, again, the

01:22:21 --> 01:22:25

Greek is important, and RK and how Lagace in the beginning was the

01:22:25 --> 01:22:25

Word.

01:22:27 --> 01:22:32

And the Word was with God. Chi ha Laga, same process, tun, Theon,

01:22:32 --> 01:22:37

and the Word was with the god definite article, chi, Fe OS,

01:22:38 --> 01:22:45

indefinite chi Fe EOS ain hallazgos. And a divine entity, I

01:22:45 --> 01:22:49

would say, yeah, exactly how Moses is called by Philo. And a

01:22:49 --> 01:22:54

sanctified agent was the word, a highly exalted decree was the

01:22:54 --> 01:22:57

word. So there's different ways of reading that text. You know,

01:22:58 --> 01:22:59

obviously,

01:23:00 --> 01:23:03

we're gonna sort of come at loggerheads with Trinitarian

01:23:04 --> 01:23:06

exigence. Yeah. But I think that there's a well established

01:23:06 --> 01:23:11

Unitarian tradition within Christian history that can be

01:23:11 --> 01:23:14

looked at that is in line with our theology. I enjoy your arguments,

01:23:14 --> 01:23:16

and they're very well developed. And thank you. Thank you for your

01:23:16 --> 01:23:18

scholarship. Thank you, for the hard one. Yes, sir.

01:23:20 --> 01:23:22

Going to take a question from online with your permission.

01:23:24 --> 01:23:30

We have been asked by proto Orthodox Christian, do you mean

01:23:30 --> 01:23:36

before Constantine's Council of Nicaea Gnostics were early

01:23:36 --> 01:23:40

Christians, that did not go along with the mainstream Catholic

01:23:40 --> 01:23:44

doctrine? Correct? Yeah, I'm using this term. I think it was coined

01:23:44 --> 01:23:49

by Ehrman proto orthodox. So the way that Ehrman is using it,

01:23:50 --> 01:23:54

Ehrman is the author of the Orthodox corruption of Scripture,

01:23:54 --> 01:24:00

Misquoting Jesus, and many other texts. The way that he's looking

01:24:00 --> 01:24:04

at it, as he says, There's four main groups of Christians, four

01:24:04 --> 01:24:09

main groups before Nicaea, before Nicaea, to the proto Orthodox, and

01:24:09 --> 01:24:13

the Aryans are included in there as well. There's great diversity

01:24:13 --> 01:24:16

within proto orthodoxy, but basically the forerunners of what

01:24:16 --> 01:24:20

would be Orthodox Christianity. And then another group, the

01:24:20 --> 01:24:22

Gnostics and then another group, the Marcia knights that I

01:24:22 --> 01:24:26

mentioned. And then a fourth group, he mentions as the

01:24:26 --> 01:24:30

Ebionites or the you know, the, the Jewish Christians, those

01:24:30 --> 01:24:33

Christians who had a more Jewish orientation in their in their

01:24:33 --> 01:24:39

theology. So I'm using the term as as Ehrman is using it for runners

01:24:39 --> 01:24:41

of Christian orthodoxy. Let's take a question over here.

01:24:43 --> 01:24:47

Thank you, stead of ally for your talk as a fellow lover of the

01:24:47 --> 01:24:52

Bible and the Koran and their languages. It's very refreshing to

01:24:52 --> 01:24:56

hear someone who's as fluid in God's chosen languages for His

01:24:56 --> 01:24:57

scriptures as you are.

01:24:59 --> 01:25:00

I found that

01:25:00 --> 01:25:03

Interesting to answer the question of whether Muslims and Christians

01:25:03 --> 01:25:06

and Jews worship the same God, you turn to language.

01:25:08 --> 01:25:11

As I think the way that I've often learned and studied biblical

01:25:11 --> 01:25:15

languages from the perspective of Modern Linguistics, the signifier,

01:25:15 --> 01:25:20

the signified, it's an arbitrary connection, why is a lot related

01:25:20 --> 01:25:24

to Elohim? It's just because they come from the same proto Semitic

01:25:24 --> 01:25:29

root, it doesn't really have any meaning in itself. That is, the

01:25:29 --> 01:25:34

form of the language isn't part of the Revelation. So how would you

01:25:34 --> 01:25:39

reconcile the way that maybe a modern linguistic approach would

01:25:39 --> 01:25:43

would look at this with the way that you're approaching it? And

01:25:43 --> 01:25:46

this is not a question that I've answered either. So I'm curious on

01:25:46 --> 01:25:51

your take? Yeah, I think it's, I think there's two ways to go about

01:25:51 --> 01:25:55

the question. One is looking at linguistic aspect of it.

01:25:56 --> 01:26:00

You know, there's an old Italian axiom that says the translator is

01:26:00 --> 01:26:04

a trader, right? So looking at languages, looking at Scripture

01:26:04 --> 01:26:08

through translation, you just, I can't I can't even do it anymore.

01:26:08 --> 01:26:11

I can't read an English Koran. I can't read the New Testament in

01:26:11 --> 01:26:17

English. You. It's like watching. What's the analogy I use? It's

01:26:17 --> 01:26:20

like listening to the Superbowl on the radio, that's a translation,

01:26:20 --> 01:26:26

and then watching the Superbowl on an IMAX in four D. That's reading

01:26:26 --> 01:26:30

the original, original languages. So I think it is important to make

01:26:30 --> 01:26:32

those linguistic connections. I think that's very important. But

01:26:32 --> 01:26:35

at the end of the day, like I said, the ancient Canaanites they

01:26:35 --> 01:26:39

called God ail the Canaanites, right? They don't worship the God

01:26:39 --> 01:26:44

of Abraham. So saying, making these linguistic connections are

01:26:44 --> 01:26:47

important. But then that's why we also have to look at the concept

01:26:47 --> 01:26:50

of God. What does the Quran actually say about God? does the

01:26:50 --> 01:26:53

Quran say that this is the moon god? What does it say? What's his

01:26:53 --> 01:26:57

personality in the Quran? Is your theological consistency there with

01:26:57 --> 01:27:00

God's quote unquote, personality? Other people point out, you know,

01:27:00 --> 01:27:07

Lucifer and Isaiah, Hebrew and Hebrew Lucifer is halal, halal,

01:27:07 --> 01:27:11

right. And, you know, these apologies, these polemicist, they

01:27:11 --> 01:27:13

say, you know that moon is called a hill out.

01:27:15 --> 01:27:15

Don't.

01:27:17 --> 01:27:20

So it's a symbol of Lucifer, because it has a common

01:27:20 --> 01:27:25

etymological root. Oh, really? Yeah. You know, what else has

01:27:25 --> 01:27:27

shares that route? Hallelujah.

01:27:28 --> 01:27:33

Right? Well, wait a minute. So linguistic things are interesting,

01:27:33 --> 01:27:36

right? And I think that it's very, very important. Because these

01:27:36 --> 01:27:39

languages were revealed in the these books were revealed in these

01:27:39 --> 01:27:45

languages, right? That you missed so much in translation. And you

01:27:45 --> 01:27:48

really don't get the full flavor of the text and you in the Quran.

01:27:49 --> 01:27:53

There are four words for heart, and an English for all translated

01:27:53 --> 01:27:58

heart. There's four different words, A sada and foo add and

01:27:58 --> 01:28:02

called, and Loeb, and they all have very interesting nuances of

01:28:02 --> 01:28:07

meaning. And you just missed that in translation. In the New

01:28:07 --> 01:28:10

Testament, there are different words for love in the gospel of

01:28:10 --> 01:28:14

God pay philia oftentimes, you know, at the end of the Gospel of

01:28:14 --> 01:28:18

John, you know, chapter 21. You know, Jesus asked Peter, do you

01:28:18 --> 01:28:21

love me? You know, I love you. Do you love me? You know, I love you.

01:28:21 --> 01:28:25

You love me, you know, I love you like what's going on here? But the

01:28:25 --> 01:28:32

word for love is different. Right? I got I got past me Naiku da. He

01:28:32 --> 01:28:32

says

01:28:34 --> 01:28:36

get nose kiss.

01:28:37 --> 01:28:41

get asked this filo say says Do you have a god pay for me? Yes,

01:28:41 --> 01:28:45

Lord, you know, I have philia for you. And then he repeats aka past

01:28:45 --> 01:28:49

me. You have a god pay for me. But the translation Do you love me is

01:28:49 --> 01:28:53

I love you. You love me? Yes, I love you. Okay. So looking at

01:28:53 --> 01:28:57

language is extremely important. So looking at these things, I

01:28:57 --> 01:28:57

think,

01:28:59 --> 01:29:03

at least for me, is something that I found to be revelatory, I found

01:29:03 --> 01:29:08

to be a way of bringing communities together. Right, is a

01:29:08 --> 01:29:13

way of, of heightening the discourse from the polemicist some

01:29:13 --> 01:29:17

of you know, turn this on its side and it says Bismillah which is

01:29:18 --> 01:29:22

unfortunately very, very popular. You have Muslim polemicists, right

01:29:22 --> 01:29:26

who go up and they make fun of the Bible. You know, they laugh at

01:29:26 --> 01:29:29

Christians, you know what they do in church man? They take this

01:29:29 --> 01:29:33

bread and it's like, what do you you know, the Quran says Orilla

01:29:33 --> 01:29:37

CBD Arabic Bill Hekmati? Well Merida till Hassan what Jad dill

01:29:37 --> 01:29:41

humility, here axon, the Quran says called people to the way of

01:29:41 --> 01:29:46

your LORD with Wisdom and the aroma hearsay wisdom here is with,

01:29:46 --> 01:29:50

with proofs with with sophisticated

01:29:51 --> 01:29:55

academic rigor. What about you? That's an hasna. And with

01:29:55 --> 01:29:59

beautiful exhortation This means to do it with a good comportment.

01:30:00 --> 01:30:04

Right. So one is not arrogant when they're doing it. And one isn't.

01:30:06 --> 01:30:10

One one isn't very humble but cannot provide academic proofs

01:30:11 --> 01:30:15

and debate with them or argue with them in ways that are better than

01:30:15 --> 01:30:21

then, you know, just argumentation for the sake of ego, as the

01:30:21 --> 01:30:25

scholars interpret that, let's take a couple of questions here

01:30:25 --> 01:30:27

because we're running out of time. So if you can make a question

01:30:27 --> 01:30:30

short, and we'll try and move through, thanks. It's not like

01:30:31 --> 01:30:33

you said that the word theist is used as

01:30:36 --> 01:30:39

an Loralee upbringing for Jesus and Moses in the Bible, in the

01:30:39 --> 01:30:43

Bible, not in the Bible. Moses by Philo. Okay, contemporary of John.

01:30:43 --> 01:30:46

Yeah. Okay. So do you know so those are two prophets that didn't

01:30:46 --> 01:30:49

have fathers? Do you know that the same word is used for prophets who

01:30:49 --> 01:30:54

did have fathers such as Joseph or Abraham, Ishmael?

01:30:55 --> 01:30:59

Isaac, who didn't have fathers didn't have fathers, they weren't

01:30:59 --> 01:31:03

brought up by their fathers. Right. So I word was used for them

01:31:03 --> 01:31:08

as in lordly nourishment. Okay. I don't know. I mean, the point I

01:31:08 --> 01:31:12

was making is that floss, anyone can be a floss, the judges are

01:31:12 --> 01:31:16

called Gods at 10 Elohim. That's, that's the Hebrew of judges.

01:31:16 --> 01:31:20

That's what Jesus uses in John, in his debate against the Pharisees.

01:31:20 --> 01:31:23

And these judges probably were raised by their fathers. That's

01:31:23 --> 01:31:28

not the point. The point is that, that a famous atheists a God and

01:31:28 --> 01:31:31

we obviously, this is, you know, we have to get accustomed to how

01:31:31 --> 01:31:34

the Bible uses language because I'm not gonna say that, you know,

01:31:34 --> 01:31:39

what, Allah when he is a God, we don't call men God. Ila a God is

01:31:39 --> 01:31:44

not used the way we use Arabic. Right. But that word really means

01:31:44 --> 01:31:45

what the

01:31:46 --> 01:31:50

right that's what that means. You are saints of God, sanctified

01:31:50 --> 01:31:55

agents of God. That's, I believe that's how it's being used in the

01:31:55 --> 01:31:56

Tanakh and in the New Testament.

01:32:00 --> 01:32:04

Salam Alaikum. Welcome. So I want to ask you a question regarding

01:32:04 --> 01:32:09

the comparing the gods from Christianity and Old Testament,

01:32:10 --> 01:32:16

Jews and Islam. I got a question I really about the Gospel says,

01:32:17 --> 01:32:21

Jesus Christ said, Whoever came before me, he was a thief and

01:32:21 --> 01:32:28

liar. So Christianity says, That's why only Jesus didn't lie. So

01:32:28 --> 01:32:32

whereas before was a false question is if the John came and

01:32:32 --> 01:32:37

introduced Jesus Christ, so according to the book is a liar.

01:32:38 --> 01:32:43

And Abraham was a liar. Moses was a liar. So I should actually ask

01:32:43 --> 01:32:47

this question about the pastor. I know your knowledge about them,

01:32:47 --> 01:32:48

Gospels, and also,

01:32:49 --> 01:32:50

Paul says,

01:32:51 --> 01:32:54

The Jews killed God.

01:32:55 --> 01:33:01

And the Jews are our enemy and God's enemy. So if the Paul

01:33:01 --> 01:33:04

believe on the other Christianity, believe it, they shouldn't believe

01:33:04 --> 01:33:08

anything on Old Testament and Torah, because all those messenger

01:33:08 --> 01:33:12

of God came. And if they are, you know, they think that they killed

01:33:12 --> 01:33:16

God, then how come they don't separate their books? That's my

01:33:16 --> 01:33:20

question. Yeah. Thank you. Good question. So I think what you're

01:33:20 --> 01:33:22

referring to earlier in John 10, perhaps,

01:33:23 --> 01:33:28

John 10, I am I am the good shepherd is a John 10. Anyone to

01:33:28 --> 01:33:33

remember. So he says before me were were before me came.

01:33:34 --> 01:33:38

Thieves and brigands lay stays. I don't think he's talking about

01:33:38 --> 01:33:42

prophets that came before him. I don't interpret it that way. I

01:33:42 --> 01:33:47

think he's talking about messianic claimants who came before him. And

01:33:47 --> 01:33:53

obviously, we're liars because Jesus is the true Messiah.

01:33:54 --> 01:33:59

And he says he, he characterizes these pseudo messiahs as those who

01:33:59 --> 01:34:03

want to enter through another door into the sheep gate, not through

01:34:03 --> 01:34:08

the proper door, and he says, I am that door. Right. So you know,

01:34:08 --> 01:34:12

people who want to materialize the messianic kingdom through other

01:34:12 --> 01:34:16

ways. For example, you can take example like Barabas, right

01:34:16 --> 01:34:17

through zealotry

01:34:18 --> 01:34:22

or one can make an example of like Judas trying to force you know,

01:34:23 --> 01:34:24

Christ to do something.

01:34:26 --> 01:34:28

Allahu Allah. I don't know, but I don't think he's referring to

01:34:29 --> 01:34:34

previous prophets there. And as far as what Paul says, about, you

01:34:34 --> 01:34:35

know, the Jews with a Judeans.

01:34:37 --> 01:34:38

Yeah, I would I would consider

01:34:39 --> 01:34:42

a lot of what Paul says to be problematic. I think you're

01:34:42 --> 01:34:49

referring to First Thessalonians 215 where he says, they they

01:34:49 --> 01:34:53

killed the Lord Jesus and their prophets, they please not God and

01:34:53 --> 01:34:55

are contrary to all men.

01:34:57 --> 01:35:00

So this requires a sophisticated X

01:35:00 --> 01:35:03

to Jesus that I can't give you right now. But on the face of

01:35:03 --> 01:35:05

that, and it's really important, you know that when we look at

01:35:05 --> 01:35:08

these texts, I can make anyone look violent and racist. I can

01:35:08 --> 01:35:12

quote something from the Koran out of context and make the text look

01:35:12 --> 01:35:18

like it's, you know, terribly violent, or sexist or misogynist.

01:35:18 --> 01:35:21

I can do that with my monitors, I can do what the khazali I can do

01:35:21 --> 01:35:24

with Aquinas, right. So these things require me I can't answer

01:35:24 --> 01:35:28

this question in 30 seconds. These things require sophisticated

01:35:28 --> 01:35:28

exegesis.

01:35:30 --> 01:35:30

You know,

01:35:33 --> 01:35:36

we'll tell you a story. But Forget it. I'll tell you next time around

01:35:36 --> 01:35:40

is there a question from the online? That actually our camera

01:35:40 --> 01:35:43

lady had a very good question. I want to give her the opportunity

01:35:43 --> 01:35:46

to let's, let's make that the last question. Because we're running

01:35:46 --> 01:35:50

out of time. Go ahead. I can you expand upon people calling

01:35:50 --> 01:35:55

themselves gods? You mentioned that. And when you said it, you

01:35:55 --> 01:36:00

mentioned people calling themselves gods? Can you expand

01:36:00 --> 01:36:03

upon that only because when you said that I instantly thought

01:36:03 --> 01:36:08

about in hip hop culture, there's the commonality of people calling

01:36:08 --> 01:36:09

themselves gods and

01:36:10 --> 01:36:14

and there's branches of people within the African American

01:36:14 --> 01:36:18

community that this is like a thing. And so I just wanted to if

01:36:18 --> 01:36:21

you could expand upon that, okay, well, that's something in pop

01:36:21 --> 01:36:24

culture. I'm out of touch. So

01:36:25 --> 01:36:28

you know, I'm I'm quite agent, when it comes to that.

01:36:29 --> 01:36:31

I'm still talking about Three's Company. So

01:36:32 --> 01:36:33

anyway,

01:36:34 --> 01:36:41

yeah. So this again, this concept of human beings being called God,

01:36:41 --> 01:36:43

this is found in the Old and New Testament, it appears like the

01:36:43 --> 01:36:49

word in Greek faith boss is applied to broadly to someone who

01:36:49 --> 01:36:50

has some sort of

01:36:52 --> 01:36:54

extraordinary ability of some sort.

01:36:56 --> 01:37:00

You know, the god of this world, you know, reference to Satan, you

01:37:00 --> 01:37:03

know, he has an extraordinary ability. But I think when the,

01:37:03 --> 01:37:08

Jesus says in John, those to whom receive those, those who receive

01:37:08 --> 01:37:12

the messages of God are called Gods in Scripture cannot be

01:37:12 --> 01:37:16

broken. So in the Old Testament has phenomena of, of prophets of

01:37:16 --> 01:37:18

God being referred to as God?

01:37:19 --> 01:37:23

Right interchangeably. Very interesting. I think there's some

01:37:23 --> 01:37:26

of this in the Quran. Juan Mata Mata either Amita, while akin

01:37:26 --> 01:37:31

Allah ha Rama, very interesting verse, the prophet one time, he

01:37:31 --> 01:37:36

picked up some stones and he threw them. And God said to him, You

01:37:36 --> 01:37:43

didn't throw when you threw God through? Meaning that the limbs

01:37:43 --> 01:37:47

the actions, the words of the Prophet are totally guided by God

01:37:47 --> 01:37:51

when he does something even so seemingly mundane, it is according

01:37:51 --> 01:37:55

to God's will, pleasing will. That type of mystical union it is as if

01:37:55 --> 01:37:59

even out of the stresses it is as if God did it. And the prophet

01:37:59 --> 01:38:04

speaks it is as if God is speaking, as if Kana, right

01:38:04 --> 01:38:08

because his limbs and his speech are guided by God. There's a

01:38:08 --> 01:38:11

beautiful Hadith a sound Hadith in Bukhari, Hadith glitzy sacred

01:38:11 --> 01:38:16

Hadith extra Quranic utterance, the Prophet says, that God says,

01:38:16 --> 01:38:19

My servant does not draw close unto me with anything more beloved

01:38:19 --> 01:38:24

by me than his obligatory acts of worship. While Ah, yes, I do. Abdi

01:38:24 --> 01:38:28

Yatta caribou, Illa benowa Phil, and he continues to draw close

01:38:28 --> 01:38:34

unto me, with extra acts of worship had to hit by until I love

01:38:34 --> 01:38:38

him, and then I become the eye by which he sees the hand by which he

01:38:38 --> 01:38:42

holds and the foot by which he walks and he if he were to ask

01:38:42 --> 01:38:44

anything from me, I shall surely give it to him.

01:38:45 --> 01:38:48

So this is not we don't take this hockey cut to God becomes your eye

01:38:48 --> 01:38:51

becomes that means this person become sanctified by God.

01:38:52 --> 01:38:56

His limbs become guided by God. This is a type of mystical union

01:38:56 --> 01:39:00

that we're talking about. Such people are called I will Yeah, in

01:39:00 --> 01:39:03

Arabic in the court in the Bible, they're called Elohim gods.

01:39:04 --> 01:39:06

divinities lowercase d,

01:39:07 --> 01:39:08

right.

01:39:10 --> 01:39:15

Also in the Quran surah to Toba is 62. What Allahu Allah sunnah who

01:39:15 --> 01:39:20

are Haku and Euro do who God and His Messenger it is more befitting

01:39:20 --> 01:39:23

that you please him. So two subjects are mentioned but the

01:39:23 --> 01:39:27

pronoun is third masculine, singular, it's not a duel. So one

01:39:27 --> 01:39:31

might say, well, it looks like an error. The reference is two but

01:39:31 --> 01:39:34

the pronoun is see, no, this was intentional. Aim for it to be

01:39:34 --> 01:39:37

says. This means that God and His Messenger have an intimate very

01:39:37 --> 01:39:41

close relationship, that if you please, Allah's Messenger, it is

01:39:41 --> 01:39:45

as if you're pleasing God. If you displease Allah's messengers, as

01:39:45 --> 01:39:47

if you're displeasing God, this type of mystical union.

01:39:48 --> 01:39:49

Alright.

01:39:50 --> 01:39:54

And there's other things we can look at as well. But maybe we're

01:39:54 --> 01:39:58

out of time. Okay, please join me in giving a round of applause to

01:39:58 --> 01:39:58

Dr. Olea thigh

01:40:06 --> 01:40:09

Thank you very much. If I said anything offensive, please forgive

01:40:09 --> 01:40:09

me.

01:40:11 --> 01:40:14

So thank you. Thank you all for coming and on the way out. You

01:40:14 --> 01:40:17

might peek into the bookstore and be safe tonight. May God be with

01:40:17 --> 01:40:18

you

Share Page