Zakir Naik – Is Religious Fundamentalism A Stumbling Block In The Freedom of Expression – 3 of 6

Zakir Naik
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses fundamentalists WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp

AI: Summary ©

00:00:03 --> 00:00:03
			I know
		
00:00:06 --> 00:00:07
			how,
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:35
			Mr. Chairman, I learned the press and media better than
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:37
			I did.
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:41
			Assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu.
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:45
			of Almighty God,
		
00:00:48 --> 00:00:48
			the topic
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:52
			of fundamentalism,
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:00
			what is the meaning of
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:03
			a fundamental
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:10
			doctor?
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:15
			practice the fundamentals of medicine
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:22
			and practice.
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:28
			In short, it should be fundamental in the field of mathematics
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:36
			and practice
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:45
			and practice
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:51
			are fundamentalists
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:55
			as good,
		
00:01:57 --> 00:01:57
			as bad,
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:01
			as a fundamentalist doctor,
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:09
			the fundamentals
		
00:02:10 --> 00:02:11
			are fundamentals
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:20
			regarding the definition
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:23
			of fundamental,
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:33
			fundamental was a movement started in America in the early 20th century by the Americans
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:35
			again,
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:41
			and there is no in the Bible
		
00:02:43 --> 00:02:51
			that the law and the faith and the belief of the Bible of God, but not the American protection,
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:58
			that every word, every word, every letter in the Bible
		
00:02:59 --> 00:03:01
			was the word of God of
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:06
			the Bible is actually the Word of God.
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:11
			If a perfect
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:16
			every word in the Bible is not the word of God, then
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:20
			regarding
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:23
			my
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:31
			fundamental
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:37
			fundamental principles,
		
00:03:44 --> 00:03:45
			but according to
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:48
			the fundamentals
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:55
			of fundamental principles, or doctrines of
		
00:03:58 --> 00:04:01
			the word Islamic nation in the latest edition of
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:03
			fundamentalist
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:07
			Islam
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:11
			that I'm proud and happy to be a part of.
		
00:04:12 --> 00:04:15
			Because I know that the fundamentals of Islam are good.
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:20
			You're worried
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:27
			that when you use the word fundamentalist, it's normally
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:29
			like
		
00:04:32 --> 00:04:32
			the moment
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:37
			the violence
		
00:04:41 --> 00:04:42
			is against
		
00:04:43 --> 00:04:44
			Islam
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:47
			submitting
		
00:04:48 --> 00:04:49
			to God
		
00:04:52 --> 00:04:53
			but also
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:59
			the last time I'd ever pick up the Wi Fi
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:05
			Maybe given different labels
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:11
			like
		
00:05:14 --> 00:05:15
			the freedom fighters,
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:17
			independence,
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:21
			they will tell you that
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:22
			they are
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:29
			suffering through the British government, the fighters,
		
00:05:30 --> 00:05:31
			but according to the
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:34
			Kaiser vaccine freedom fighters,
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:39
			you can actually have
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:42
			by two different groups of people.
		
00:05:43 --> 00:05:44
			So before you live in
		
00:05:46 --> 00:05:47
			an apartment,
		
00:05:49 --> 00:05:51
			you have to first analyze
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:52
			if you're
		
00:05:53 --> 00:05:55
			gonna do that,
		
00:05:56 --> 00:05:57
			Michael India
		
00:05:59 --> 00:05:59
			freedom fighters
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:05
			with a view of the Indian, that these people are actually fighting
		
00:06:06 --> 00:06:07
			for the freedom
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:10
			the same purpose. And
		
00:06:13 --> 00:06:13
			if you mean
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:17
			by all means I'm
		
00:06:19 --> 00:06:20
			hoping to follow
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:22
			and happy and drought
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:32
			fundamentalism a stumbling block in the freedom of expression.
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:35
			What do you mean?
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:41
			Before I come to my question, I'd like to put a light on the point
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:46
			that the fundamentalist
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:47
			interpretation
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:49
			and did not agree for
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:51
			with
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:55
			the objective
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:56
			of
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:00
			Islam.
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:06
			And Islam also allows the dialogue, it clearly mentioned in the
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:07
			beginning
		
00:07:16 --> 00:07:17
			return
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:19
			we can have a common dialogue
		
00:07:22 --> 00:07:22
			with
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:26
			the first thing
		
00:07:27 --> 00:07:28
			that you cannot make changes.
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:33
			Regarding the last point
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:35
			you can make
		
00:07:40 --> 00:07:40
			that
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:49
			you cannot make any changes in the revelation of God Almighty, I cannot make an opinion in the
branch.
		
00:07:50 --> 00:07:52
			But when it comes to Islam,
		
00:07:53 --> 00:07:57
			the Sharia law, the Quran does not mention about the particular problem
		
00:07:58 --> 00:08:00
			does not mention a particular problem you have
		
00:08:01 --> 00:08:04
			if you have to get a loan
		
00:08:07 --> 00:08:11
			it's long Jeopardy for as long as it's not going against the Holy Scripture
		
00:08:13 --> 00:08:13
			regarding
		
00:08:17 --> 00:08:18
			what do you mean by
		
00:08:23 --> 00:08:24
			times
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:30
			without hurting anyone, without causing any harm to any community? It is not
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:33
			in the freedom of expression.
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:37
			Freedom of expression is that
		
00:08:38 --> 00:08:40
			without hesitation, you can abuse anyone.
		
00:08:42 --> 00:08:47
			Anyone out there, Islam, Islamic fundamentalism
		
00:08:48 --> 00:08:49
			as well as
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:54
			there are various types of
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:56
			if you say that
		
00:08:58 --> 00:08:59
			I criticize anyone
		
00:09:01 --> 00:09:02
			without any
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:04
			without any politics.
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:13
			Then I will take Islam, which fundamentalism is definitely a stumbling block in the freedom of
expression
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:15
			is
		
00:09:21 --> 00:09:21
			equal
		
00:09:23 --> 00:09:24
			to every kind of
		
00:09:29 --> 00:09:29
			capital.
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:37
			Do not give up
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:41
			on
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:48
			either the back and the front continue. Are you willing to have
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:53
			underground
		
00:09:56 --> 00:09:57
			meaning that
		
00:09:58 --> 00:09:59
			it means you're having the deadly
		
00:10:01 --> 00:10:02
			Because it's
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:05
			not about anyone without any proof
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:08
			and eating,
		
00:10:10 --> 00:10:11
			and the doctor can testify
		
00:10:17 --> 00:10:18
			against someone behind the mic
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:22
			eating the judgment of the candidate.
		
00:10:26 --> 00:10:26
			And also,
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:29
			they don't pack the
		
00:10:31 --> 00:10:31
			bag by
		
00:10:32 --> 00:10:33
			eating the dead meat.
		
00:10:38 --> 00:10:39
			know some people say that
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:42
			freedom of
		
00:10:43 --> 00:10:43
			speech
		
00:10:44 --> 00:10:45
			does not harm anyone.
		
00:10:49 --> 00:10:49
			But
		
00:10:51 --> 00:11:00
			the mental torture is much more complex. physical torture is much more long lasting.
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:02
			I'd like to give an example.
		
00:11:06 --> 00:11:08
			And without any reason, without any
		
00:11:10 --> 00:11:11
			more time.
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:14
			That's
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:24
			it for a few minutes. But the mental trauma in front of the company is much larger and much more
damage
		
00:11:26 --> 00:11:26
			together.
		
00:11:32 --> 00:11:32
			As
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:34
			an
		
00:11:35 --> 00:11:35
			example,
		
00:11:39 --> 00:11:40
			I'll do this exercise
		
00:11:41 --> 00:11:42
			called the matrix.
		
00:11:44 --> 00:11:44
			And
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:50
			let me set the second example of the future started
		
00:11:51 --> 00:11:51
			calling him
		
00:11:53 --> 00:11:59
			and giving him a printed name is much more complex as compared to slapping him
		
00:12:00 --> 00:12:00
			around
		
00:12:07 --> 00:12:07
			sometimes
		
00:12:10 --> 00:12:12
			referred to that is
		
00:12:15 --> 00:12:16
			a wonderful opportunity to
		
00:12:18 --> 00:12:18
			learn
		
00:12:23 --> 00:12:24
			mankind.
		
00:12:28 --> 00:12:30
			I think you want to prove the brand wrong.
		
00:12:43 --> 00:12:44
			Together.
		
00:12:46 --> 00:12:47
			that
		
00:12:49 --> 00:12:50
			hadn't been from anyone that
		
00:12:51 --> 00:12:52
			there would have been.
		
00:12:53 --> 00:12:55
			There have been many contradictions.
		
00:13:00 --> 00:13:03
			The only thing you have to do is take
		
00:13:08 --> 00:13:12
			that same time granted, we'll have to read article 30
		
00:13:20 --> 00:13:21
			dads
		
00:13:24 --> 00:13:25
			do their thing.
		
00:13:41 --> 00:13:42
			I know many of
		
00:13:53 --> 00:13:54
			you find a copy.
		
00:14:01 --> 00:14:04
			Let me tell you the word software does not
		
00:14:05 --> 00:14:07
			it means a person who can see the
		
00:14:09 --> 00:14:10
			project
		
00:14:11 --> 00:14:13
			and have you given the context.
		
00:14:15 --> 00:14:17
			Give an example. Suppose America
		
00:14:19 --> 00:14:20
			and during the budget
		
00:14:23 --> 00:14:25
			the Army General of America
		
00:14:27 --> 00:14:28
			wherever you find Vietnamese
		
00:14:31 --> 00:14:33
			later on, that thing happened
		
00:14:34 --> 00:14:35
			seven years ago.
		
00:14:38 --> 00:14:39
			You find out
		
00:14:46 --> 00:14:47
			the opposite side your
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:50
			potential you have to defend yourself
		
00:14:51 --> 00:14:58
			in the same fashion that what I mentioned that Ben didn't come to attack you from Brooklyn. You
don't fight them.
		
00:15:03 --> 00:15:05
			It is not enough
		
00:15:16 --> 00:15:17
			that you can blame anyone.
		
00:15:21 --> 00:15:22
			Again
		
00:15:23 --> 00:15:23
			provided
		
00:15:25 --> 00:15:26
			some facts
		
00:15:27 --> 00:15:27
			some
		
00:15:31 --> 00:15:37
			government officials working in American government can tell us all the details how the American
army
		
00:15:43 --> 00:15:44
			you mind
		
00:15:45 --> 00:15:46
			giving you
		
00:15:50 --> 00:15:51
			all the secrets of the American government
		
00:15:53 --> 00:15:54
			American government
		
00:16:02 --> 00:16:02
			government
		
00:16:03 --> 00:16:04
			in the Indian government
		
00:16:06 --> 00:16:06
			and
		
00:16:08 --> 00:16:08
			that
		
00:16:10 --> 00:16:12
			surely not if you're pulling on driving
		
00:16:22 --> 00:16:23
			record
		
00:16:26 --> 00:16:27
			from the law side
		
00:16:35 --> 00:16:36
			this is not an
		
00:16:37 --> 00:16:41
			example of government officials in America against
		
00:16:42 --> 00:16:43
			the government in America.
		
00:16:57 --> 00:16:58
			I'd like to
		
00:17:00 --> 00:17:01
			dial
		
00:17:02 --> 00:17:02
			in
		
00:17:10 --> 00:17:11
			when Chris
		
00:17:20 --> 00:17:21
			Murphy and Dini for the
		
00:17:23 --> 00:17:24
			for the
		
00:17:28 --> 00:17:29
			purpose and
		
00:17:34 --> 00:17:34
			purpose like
		
00:17:36 --> 00:17:37
			critical
		
00:17:39 --> 00:17:40
			thinking
		
00:17:43 --> 00:17:46
			honey, the computer of luck