Suhaib Webb – Usul alFiqh Lesson Nineteen Universals

Suhaib Webb
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the use of universal words in the Quran and Hadith, including "am" and "ammo" in various context. They also mention the differences between the definition of "am" and "ammo" in the Quran and Hadith, as well as the use of "naq" in the Quran for "ammo." The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the meaning of "am" in the Quran and Hadith, as it is universal.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:18 --> 00:00:20

Before we get started, the special gua for

00:00:20 --> 00:00:21

the people of Sudan,

00:00:21 --> 00:00:23

people of Kashmir,

00:00:23 --> 00:00:26

specifically now what we're seeing happening in Palestine

00:00:26 --> 00:00:28

And the Gaza, we ask Allah to

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32

make Ihia of this

00:00:41 --> 00:00:43

So now he's gonna move on from talking

00:00:43 --> 00:00:43

about

00:00:44 --> 00:00:46

words that the meaning is in the actual

00:00:46 --> 00:00:47

word.

00:00:47 --> 00:00:49

It's in the actual word. Like,

00:00:50 --> 00:00:51

the word itself

00:00:52 --> 00:00:53

carries that meaning.

00:00:53 --> 00:00:55

Towards now, what we say are the that

00:00:55 --> 00:00:56

means

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00

that these are more like the the the

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02

attributes of the qualities that come with these

00:01:02 --> 00:01:04

words. I don't wanna get into that a

00:01:04 --> 00:01:05

lot now,

00:01:05 --> 00:01:07

but in the future, in other text, we're

00:01:07 --> 00:01:09

going to talk about it. So just be

00:01:09 --> 00:01:10

ready. The added

00:01:11 --> 00:01:13

of these words and the first are gonna

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15

be those words that are

00:01:16 --> 00:01:18

universal in meeting.

00:01:19 --> 00:01:22

Universal immediate. For example, if I say suhaib,

00:01:23 --> 00:01:25

that's one person. That's not universal.

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28

But if I say al insan

00:01:28 --> 00:01:29

in sand,

00:01:30 --> 00:01:31

that's all people.

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35

That's all people. If I say meh or

00:01:35 --> 00:01:39

men, whatever or whom, that that encompasses

00:01:40 --> 00:01:42

anything that falls under the umbrella of that

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44

word. Man could be any human being on

00:01:44 --> 00:01:46

the face of the earth, any human human

00:01:46 --> 00:01:48

being that's lived or will it.

00:01:48 --> 00:01:50

Ma is any inanimate object

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54

that has existed, will exist,

00:01:54 --> 00:01:56

or is existing now. So those words like

00:01:56 --> 00:01:59

in sand and man and ma,

00:01:59 --> 00:02:03

a u a nama tapulu, you drink, call,

00:02:03 --> 00:02:04

mouth, the paralysis

00:02:04 --> 00:02:06

wherever you are, Definitely

00:02:07 --> 00:02:07

wherever.

00:02:07 --> 00:02:10

So underwear ever north, south, east, west, my

00:02:10 --> 00:02:13

house, your house, across the street. Right? It

00:02:13 --> 00:02:14

it you're still very

00:02:16 --> 00:02:18

means to submerge. So

00:02:18 --> 00:02:19

is to drown. So

00:02:20 --> 00:02:23

it the word, it it submerges

00:02:24 --> 00:02:26

all of its singular parts under the meaning

00:02:26 --> 00:02:28

of that word. Understand it that way. So

00:02:28 --> 00:02:31

for example, I'll incent list how many people

00:02:31 --> 00:02:33

would fall under the term inset.

00:02:34 --> 00:02:35

Hellas? You

00:02:36 --> 00:02:37

know, be there

00:02:37 --> 00:02:38

till end of time.

00:02:38 --> 00:02:39

Listen,

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41

who falls under that? What's under the umbrella

00:02:42 --> 00:02:43

of that word?

00:02:43 --> 00:02:44

This is called,

00:02:46 --> 00:02:48

with I am with me.

00:02:48 --> 00:02:50

If I say I'm on to cut bill

00:02:50 --> 00:02:51

at all,

00:02:51 --> 00:02:52

you know, I basically

00:02:52 --> 00:02:55

I submerged you if you will like I

00:02:55 --> 00:02:56

covered you with a gift.

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00

If there wasn't anything I neglect, So that's

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02

the meaning here. I'm are those words in

00:03:02 --> 00:03:03

the Quran

00:03:03 --> 00:03:06

and in Hadith of the prophet salallahu alayhi

00:03:06 --> 00:03:06

salam

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09

who their legal implications

00:03:09 --> 00:03:10

are

00:03:10 --> 00:03:11

universal.

00:03:11 --> 00:03:12

That's very important.

00:03:12 --> 00:03:14

That's very important because

00:03:15 --> 00:03:17

that means that that ruling applies to everybody.

00:03:18 --> 00:03:21

That ruling applies to everybody. So the Sheikh,

00:03:21 --> 00:03:21

he says

00:03:24 --> 00:03:26

as for I'm this universal word for who

00:03:26 --> 00:03:28

it is meh what

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31

meh I'm my share a d fasaden

00:03:32 --> 00:03:34

is it is what encompasses 2 or more

00:03:34 --> 00:03:34

things.

00:03:35 --> 00:03:36

Just to FYI,

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39

if you really think about the definition I

00:03:39 --> 00:03:39

gave you

00:03:40 --> 00:03:42

for I'm earlier through examples,

00:03:44 --> 00:03:45

whatever

00:03:45 --> 00:03:47

good you do, man, you put it allah.

00:03:47 --> 00:03:49

May you put it

00:03:49 --> 00:03:52

all out of them. Whoever gives to God

00:03:53 --> 00:03:54

a good loan, whoever.

00:03:57 --> 00:03:58

You know, that

00:03:59 --> 00:04:00

that definition that he gives, you're gonna see

00:04:00 --> 00:04:03

that there's an issue with many scholars of

00:04:04 --> 00:04:06

about this definition from Aluma, by the way,

00:04:07 --> 00:04:09

that Imam Al Haramain took from Asharazi

00:04:10 --> 00:04:10

Al Ustef,

00:04:11 --> 00:04:12

ma'am, I'm Shayain

00:04:12 --> 00:04:14

because if you say 2 things, that's not

00:04:14 --> 00:04:15

I'm anymore.

00:04:15 --> 00:04:16

That's cause

00:04:17 --> 00:04:18

specific and that's gonna come later on. So

00:04:18 --> 00:04:20

understand right now

00:04:20 --> 00:04:21

that there is a disagreement

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24

amongst the 3 that

00:04:25 --> 00:04:27

make up what's called the of

00:04:29 --> 00:04:30

the also also. Who are the motakalimid?

00:04:32 --> 00:04:32

The Madakis,

00:04:33 --> 00:04:34

the Shafi'is, and the Hanbalis.

00:04:35 --> 00:04:37

The other madhab in also the fulk is

00:04:37 --> 00:04:39

called the fuqa. Who's that? Sadatu

00:04:40 --> 00:04:43

al Hanafi at Hanafi's. Just remember that. But

00:04:43 --> 00:04:44

within the the

00:04:45 --> 00:04:47

Madakis, the Shafi's, the Hanbali's, there's a difference

00:04:47 --> 00:04:48

of opinion.

00:04:48 --> 00:04:51

Is an am something that is 2 or

00:04:51 --> 00:04:51

more words

00:04:52 --> 00:04:54

or is it something which is plural? Does

00:04:54 --> 00:04:56

it Because 2 would be limiting it. So

00:04:56 --> 00:04:59

for example, imam ibn Hajib says, left on

00:04:59 --> 00:04:59

your stock

00:05:00 --> 00:05:01

report, jamia afradi.

00:05:02 --> 00:05:04

Be deaf Ateen

00:05:05 --> 00:05:05

Right.

00:05:07 --> 00:05:09

A word that encompasses

00:05:10 --> 00:05:11

all of Efradi,

00:05:12 --> 00:05:14

its parts, all of those in sand, all

00:05:14 --> 00:05:16

the human beings that come under that work.

00:05:17 --> 00:05:19

So just to FYI, that's gonna come up

00:05:19 --> 00:05:21

later. And I don't like to get lost

00:05:21 --> 00:05:24

in the in the, the dispute over definitions,

00:05:24 --> 00:05:25

but sometimes it helps us think

00:05:26 --> 00:05:28

more holistically. And when we study FERC, we're

00:05:28 --> 00:05:31

able to appreciate sometimes little differences rooted in

00:05:31 --> 00:05:34

definitions. So Imam Al Haramain represents one school

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37

that says am is 2 or more words.

00:05:38 --> 00:05:40

The other, like the, we say

00:05:44 --> 00:05:46

that it's a word that is not restricted

00:05:46 --> 00:05:47

to 2,

00:05:48 --> 00:05:48

but it's

00:05:49 --> 00:05:50

something which is

00:05:50 --> 00:05:51

unrestricted.

00:05:51 --> 00:05:54

Right? It's it's not exclusive this better meaning

00:05:54 --> 00:05:55

is exclusive

00:05:55 --> 00:05:58

it's not exclusive to to unrestricted is something

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00

we'll talk about the future It's not

00:06:01 --> 00:06:02

exclusive to 2.

00:06:03 --> 00:06:06

It is universal. So he says what am

00:06:06 --> 00:06:08

I am for who am I? I'm a

00:06:08 --> 00:06:09

she any

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22

Right? For example, the statement,

00:06:23 --> 00:06:23

I

00:06:24 --> 00:06:25

I

00:06:27 --> 00:06:28

that I, you

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31

know, encompassed Zayd and Amr with the other.

00:06:31 --> 00:06:31

And again,

00:06:32 --> 00:06:34

there is some concern here because you're limiting

00:06:34 --> 00:06:36

the other to 2 people. Actually the example

00:06:36 --> 00:06:37

I gave you earlier, I just wanted to

00:06:37 --> 00:06:39

show you in language what it means. It's

00:06:39 --> 00:06:41

not a full solafil example. So some people

00:06:41 --> 00:06:43

said here that Imam Al Haramain here is

00:06:43 --> 00:06:44

just giving a linguistic definition

00:06:45 --> 00:06:45

and a linguistic

00:06:46 --> 00:06:49

usage and the amount to Zayden wa'am bilaata

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51

that I I

00:06:51 --> 00:06:54

I showered if you will. Amran and Zayd

00:06:54 --> 00:06:54

with a gift.

00:06:55 --> 00:06:58

But scholars are also like you can't limit

00:06:58 --> 00:06:59

to Amran and Zaid.

00:07:02 --> 00:07:03

But if you pay attention what Imam Al

00:07:03 --> 00:07:05

Haramain is doing, he's sticking to his method.

00:07:06 --> 00:07:07

He says, which

00:07:09 --> 00:07:11

encompasses 2 things. So the first example, look

00:07:11 --> 00:07:12

at it.

00:07:15 --> 00:07:16

He mentions 2 things.

00:07:17 --> 00:07:18

So according to him,

00:07:18 --> 00:07:19

that's Amr.

00:07:23 --> 00:07:26

And I I gave all humanity, every one

00:07:26 --> 00:07:27

of them, a gift.

00:07:28 --> 00:07:30

So according to his, he's right

00:07:31 --> 00:07:32

to Amr Al Nzate

00:07:32 --> 00:07:33

or more.

00:07:35 --> 00:07:37

Those scholars like the who I mentioned earlier

00:07:37 --> 00:07:38

are gonna say no. No.

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44

The only example that works here is.

00:07:47 --> 00:07:48

I gave all humanity,

00:07:49 --> 00:07:51

something of a gift, not say it in

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53

Amr because that will be what's called

00:07:54 --> 00:07:55

to make it exclusive.

00:07:57 --> 00:07:58

Then also,

00:07:58 --> 00:08:00

scholars, they say

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

about,

00:08:01 --> 00:08:03

you know, this definition,

00:08:18 --> 00:08:19

Yeah, he doesn't mention that.

00:08:20 --> 00:08:22

But what does it mean dafat alwahida?

00:08:22 --> 00:08:25

It means that it's just one word, one

00:08:25 --> 00:08:27

expression. So al insen,

00:08:28 --> 00:08:28

one word,

00:08:29 --> 00:08:30

but it encompasses

00:08:30 --> 00:08:31

all.

00:08:31 --> 00:08:34

It's a fraud. Remember that word, a fraud,

00:08:34 --> 00:08:36

all its parts if you all its singular

00:08:37 --> 00:08:39

parts. So we deaf, I think, why he

00:08:39 --> 00:08:41

didn't come up out of Imam

00:08:43 --> 00:08:44

and his Muqtasah

00:08:44 --> 00:08:47

means in one expression it encompasses

00:08:48 --> 00:08:49

those universal meanings.

00:08:50 --> 00:08:51

So I don't have to say Suhaib,

00:08:52 --> 00:08:52

Abdullah,

00:08:53 --> 00:08:54

Ahmed, Fatima,

00:08:54 --> 00:08:55

Urukaya,

00:08:55 --> 00:08:57

Jameel, Abdullahi.

00:08:58 --> 00:08:59

Now I mention a fraud.

00:09:07 --> 00:09:08

Then how do we recognize

00:09:09 --> 00:09:12

when something is I'm when we're reading the

00:09:12 --> 00:09:12

Quran

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15

or reading reading the hadith of said a

00:09:15 --> 00:09:16

while salaahu alayhi was salamah

Share Page