Suhaib Webb – The Foundations of Arabic Part 12 The Articles of Jazim

Suhaib Webb
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss various forms of negation and rhetorical use of words in various examples, including "has" and "will." They stress the importance of learning to handle emotions and clean behavior. The speakers also discuss various forms of negation, including "offensive" and "offensive," and remind the audience to start from the future and remind them of the meaning of "offensive."
AI: Transcript ©
00:01:19 --> 00:01:20

Okay. So

00:01:21 --> 00:01:22

we stopped

00:01:23 --> 00:01:24

at the.

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28

And we mentioned that the purpose of the

00:01:28 --> 00:01:29

is

00:01:30 --> 00:01:30

to make

00:01:34 --> 00:01:35

or we can say.

00:01:40 --> 00:01:40

So,

00:01:46 --> 00:01:47

like, the job of Mardi

00:01:48 --> 00:01:48

is

00:01:49 --> 00:01:49

or

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53

or is to negate the potential of anything

00:01:53 --> 00:01:55

happening in the past.

00:01:56 --> 00:01:58

They also the opposite is true as well.

00:01:58 --> 00:02:00

Right? That there's you could seek a multi

00:02:00 --> 00:02:02

and put it in the in the future

00:02:02 --> 00:02:04

based on the OS that's in front.

00:02:04 --> 00:02:07

For example? For example, we had it,

00:02:14 --> 00:02:14

In.

00:02:22 --> 00:02:24

But this is like a condition. Right?

00:02:25 --> 00:02:26

No. Right.

00:02:27 --> 00:02:30

Like a conditional sentence for the future. Excellent.

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34

So he he says,

00:02:41 --> 00:02:42

Those things that make

00:02:49 --> 00:02:50

are,

00:02:51 --> 00:02:52

18. Right? Mhmm.

00:02:53 --> 00:02:55

And we know that, like, they're divided into

00:02:55 --> 00:02:55

2.

00:02:56 --> 00:02:57

Those that

00:02:58 --> 00:02:59

make only one verb,

00:03:00 --> 00:03:03

and those that make 2 verbs.

00:03:04 --> 00:03:05

So he says,

00:03:07 --> 00:03:10

and we said, like, is the foundation of

00:03:10 --> 00:03:10

the whole thing.

00:03:11 --> 00:03:12

To the

00:03:13 --> 00:03:16

is like Ism to Kalimat, like,

00:03:18 --> 00:03:19

land is to the.

00:03:20 --> 00:03:20

Okay?

00:03:21 --> 00:03:21

Lem

00:03:55 --> 00:03:55

Okay.

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59

So let's start again because this, like, is

00:03:59 --> 00:04:00

really important chapter.

00:04:01 --> 00:04:03

So the number of particles that make the

00:04:03 --> 00:04:05

Muldari, Joazim are 18.

00:04:22 --> 00:04:23

Mhmm.

00:04:24 --> 00:04:25

Alright?

00:04:25 --> 00:04:28

So for example, Lem Yesma, second.

00:04:29 --> 00:04:29

Mhmm.

00:04:31 --> 00:04:32

Okay?

00:04:49 --> 00:04:51

And then that takes us to what we

00:04:51 --> 00:04:53

alluded to earlier, the divisions of the are

00:04:53 --> 00:04:54

2.

00:05:00 --> 00:05:02

Okay? So for example,

00:05:04 --> 00:05:05

It's like one

00:05:06 --> 00:05:06

one,

00:05:07 --> 00:05:07

verb.

00:05:09 --> 00:05:10

What's the sign of jizm?

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54

So here we see, like, the same verb,

00:05:54 --> 00:05:56

but a different article of jazim

00:05:57 --> 00:05:59

that's in, which is

00:06:00 --> 00:06:01

a conditional article. Like, if

00:06:02 --> 00:06:03

this happens,

00:06:03 --> 00:06:04

this happens.

00:06:13 --> 00:06:14

So here,

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24

I chose this example on purpose when I

00:06:24 --> 00:06:24

was writing this

00:06:25 --> 00:06:27

to give you both. One that's

00:06:27 --> 00:06:28

and one that's.

00:06:30 --> 00:06:33

Also interesting, Sheikh. The second verb is passive.

00:06:33 --> 00:06:35

It's a different construct from the first verb.

00:06:39 --> 00:06:40

No.

00:06:46 --> 00:06:48

No. No. Don't be sorry. Listen, man.

00:06:48 --> 00:06:50

You have to be you have to feel

00:06:50 --> 00:06:52

like this is a safe space. Yeah. Right?

00:06:52 --> 00:06:54

So, like, don't worry. Like, I'm I'm gonna

00:06:54 --> 00:06:56

make mistakes too. Like,

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58

we're not here to, like,

00:06:58 --> 00:06:59

stick on our chest. You know what I

00:06:59 --> 00:07:01

mean? Like, yeah. I know more than you.

00:07:01 --> 00:07:03

Like, people like that, they end up hurting

00:07:03 --> 00:07:05

people more than they help people. Like, a

00:07:05 --> 00:07:05

true

00:07:06 --> 00:07:08

Imam Shafi said, a true a true scholar

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10

has been humbled. Like, it doesn't mean it

00:07:10 --> 00:07:11

in a bad way. It's just like they're

00:07:11 --> 00:07:13

in a place where they could say, like,

00:07:13 --> 00:07:15

I don't know, man. Or I so feel,

00:07:15 --> 00:07:18

like, comfortable to try. You know? Like,

00:07:19 --> 00:07:22

I'm happy, like, you're you're grinding your gears.

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42

So if someone corrected, it should be.

00:07:57 --> 00:07:58

This is acceptable. But like a

00:07:59 --> 00:07:59

good

00:08:00 --> 00:08:00

question,

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

man.

00:08:01 --> 00:08:03

Someone put him in fire.

00:08:11 --> 00:08:12

From Adkala.

00:08:13 --> 00:08:14

If you say,

00:08:16 --> 00:08:18

he put himself in the fire, but he

00:08:18 --> 00:08:19

can't put himself in the fire.

00:08:22 --> 00:08:25

But the point here is, first one,

00:08:28 --> 00:08:29

The second one,

00:08:33 --> 00:08:35

The first kind of are those that affect

00:08:35 --> 00:08:38

one verb. Sheikh, he mentions the first one,

00:08:39 --> 00:08:42

which mean did not. Imam Al Hariri said,

00:08:42 --> 00:08:43

you

00:08:43 --> 00:08:45

know, the job of lem, as we said

00:08:45 --> 00:08:46

earlier,

00:08:51 --> 00:08:54

So he said the particle lamb, that means

00:08:54 --> 00:08:55

did not it's also

00:08:56 --> 00:08:58

called. You don't have to say all that.

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00

Right? It's just saying it to teach you,

00:09:00 --> 00:09:02

like, to help you understand what's going on.

00:09:03 --> 00:09:04

The particle of negation

00:09:05 --> 00:09:06

that and he calls it.

00:09:12 --> 00:09:14

Okay? So let me you may be a

00:09:14 --> 00:09:14

colleague.

00:09:16 --> 00:09:17

So I'm like, you know, I talked at

00:09:17 --> 00:09:19

and can you maybe a colleague?

00:09:24 --> 00:09:26

So it's like he used to be, like,

00:09:26 --> 00:09:27

negation.

00:09:30 --> 00:09:32

So the first one is

00:09:33 --> 00:09:34

with what?

00:09:35 --> 00:09:36

The second one is.

00:09:54 --> 00:09:55

For example,

00:09:57 --> 00:10:00

what's where's the where's the sign of Jazm?

00:10:14 --> 00:10:16

So we said, for example,

00:10:16 --> 00:10:18

the use of is

00:10:18 --> 00:10:19

in response of, like,

00:10:29 --> 00:10:31

to show, like, no. It didn't happen.

00:10:31 --> 00:10:32

The next is.

00:10:33 --> 00:10:34

Carries the same meaning as.

00:10:35 --> 00:10:36

But I told you before,

00:10:37 --> 00:10:38

to feed.

00:10:39 --> 00:10:40

Mhmm. Right? So the fact that it has,

00:10:40 --> 00:10:42

like, shut that and on it, it's, like,

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45

even more emphasis that it didn't happen. So

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47

if I said to you, for example, you

00:10:47 --> 00:10:47

know,

00:10:48 --> 00:10:49

I

00:10:51 --> 00:10:52

You said,

00:10:54 --> 00:10:55

But if I said to you, like,

00:11:00 --> 00:11:02

so you can feel like it's a little

00:11:02 --> 00:11:03

bit more

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05

intense than the first. We have a very

00:11:05 --> 00:11:06

important principle.

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09

Said if a word, anything is added to

00:11:09 --> 00:11:12

it, usually, it adds to the intensity of

00:11:12 --> 00:11:13

the meaning of the word.

00:11:14 --> 00:11:14

So

00:11:26 --> 00:11:27

is stronger

00:11:27 --> 00:11:30

because you added something to the verb.

00:11:35 --> 00:11:36

So means

00:11:37 --> 00:11:38

before you and your wife can have a

00:11:38 --> 00:11:41

physical relationship, she just should clean herself.

00:11:44 --> 00:11:45

It means she should make.

00:11:48 --> 00:11:51

So, like, when something's added to the word,

00:11:52 --> 00:11:53

it adds to its meaning.

00:11:56 --> 00:11:57

Alright. More intense.

00:11:58 --> 00:11:58

So

00:12:02 --> 00:12:03

like

00:12:04 --> 00:12:06

no way he tasted the sweet so

00:12:11 --> 00:12:12

the first one is

00:12:17 --> 00:12:18

and the second

00:12:20 --> 00:12:20

good good

00:12:27 --> 00:12:29

Yeah. Good.

00:12:36 --> 00:12:37

Nice.

00:12:37 --> 00:12:38

The next is,

00:12:40 --> 00:12:42

and carries the same meaning as the others

00:12:42 --> 00:12:43

except there is a rhetorical

00:12:44 --> 00:12:46

play on words happening.

00:12:46 --> 00:12:47

It's

00:12:55 --> 00:12:56

Right?

00:12:57 --> 00:12:57

When

00:12:58 --> 00:13:00

you read in and you get to the

00:13:00 --> 00:13:01

part where you

00:13:01 --> 00:13:02

should read it.

00:13:04 --> 00:13:06

That's how you know somebody they don't understand.

00:13:06 --> 00:13:07

If you say,

00:13:08 --> 00:13:10

like, what? Like, that's not how you would

00:13:10 --> 00:13:12

say that to somebody. Like, if your mom

00:13:12 --> 00:13:13

said, did you clean your room? Did she

00:13:13 --> 00:13:15

like, did you clean your room?

00:13:16 --> 00:13:18

No. She's like, you clean your room.

00:13:18 --> 00:13:19

So that's the

00:13:22 --> 00:13:23

feeling.

00:13:26 --> 00:13:27

So

00:13:27 --> 00:13:28

like,

00:13:29 --> 00:13:29

like,

00:13:31 --> 00:13:31

you knew.

00:13:32 --> 00:13:33

You saw that.

00:13:33 --> 00:13:34

So this is a

00:13:36 --> 00:13:37

rhetorical.

00:13:38 --> 00:13:39

Like, you know I'm. So

00:13:39 --> 00:13:41

this is a form of a rhetorical question.

00:13:42 --> 00:13:44

Right? That's meant to

00:13:45 --> 00:13:47

create this sense of and

00:13:47 --> 00:13:48

negation. Yes?

00:13:49 --> 00:13:51

I have a question about the

00:13:51 --> 00:13:52

about

00:13:52 --> 00:13:53

the one before. Mhmm.

00:13:54 --> 00:13:55

Does it mean sometimes?

00:13:56 --> 00:13:57

Like, when?

00:13:58 --> 00:14:00

Yeah. It depends on the context. But now

00:14:00 --> 00:14:02

we're in Jerusalem. Okay.

00:14:02 --> 00:14:03

Okay.

00:14:06 --> 00:14:07

So

00:14:34 --> 00:14:36

So here it's like a negation

00:14:36 --> 00:14:37

met with

00:14:39 --> 00:14:40

as if to say, like, yeah. You know

00:14:40 --> 00:14:41

you did.

00:14:42 --> 00:14:43

So the answer is

00:14:48 --> 00:14:49

How do you know it's?

00:14:52 --> 00:14:53

With. Mhmm.

00:14:57 --> 00:14:59

Then carries the same meaning as and.

00:15:01 --> 00:15:04

But when we study composition, like Muhammad asked

00:15:05 --> 00:15:05

in,

00:15:06 --> 00:15:08

there's, like, subtle usages for these things,

00:15:09 --> 00:15:10

like the rhetorical device

00:15:11 --> 00:15:12

to emphasize.

00:15:17 --> 00:15:18

Wasn't that good to you?

00:15:22 --> 00:15:24

Well, they're not good to you.

00:15:26 --> 00:15:28

Like, you actually accused him of being a

00:15:28 --> 00:15:28

liar.

00:15:29 --> 00:15:31

So you're the same the same feeling.

00:15:32 --> 00:15:33

The next is the lamb of command, lamb

00:15:33 --> 00:15:34

al Amr.

00:15:35 --> 00:15:36

And this use

00:15:43 --> 00:15:46

we say that in general, same thing in.

00:15:46 --> 00:15:47

Right? That

00:15:47 --> 00:15:50

is the request of something that has, like,

00:15:51 --> 00:15:52

privilege over me,

00:15:53 --> 00:15:54

that has power over me.

00:15:57 --> 00:15:57

Here,

00:15:58 --> 00:15:59

when we find and

00:16:00 --> 00:16:00

in the middle,

00:16:01 --> 00:16:02

like, the second

00:16:02 --> 00:16:05

letter of it is lamb, second.

00:16:07 --> 00:16:07

So

00:16:08 --> 00:16:08

an 8.

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12

An 8. So

00:16:18 --> 00:16:19

he must

00:16:19 --> 00:16:20

remain silent.

00:16:21 --> 00:16:23

The next is called.

00:16:24 --> 00:16:24

So that's

00:16:28 --> 00:16:30

So when we're reading the Quran, if we

00:16:30 --> 00:16:30

come across like

00:16:31 --> 00:16:32

we should read it like.

00:16:34 --> 00:16:34

Right?

00:16:38 --> 00:16:39

So

00:16:39 --> 00:16:40

like

00:16:41 --> 00:16:44

ask your lord to destroy us. Like, we

00:16:44 --> 00:16:45

request. We beg.

00:16:47 --> 00:16:48

But you can see it's

00:16:52 --> 00:16:53

but the the

00:16:53 --> 00:16:54

the is gone because

00:17:02 --> 00:17:04

And then I showed you some stuff. I

00:17:04 --> 00:17:06

remember. I forgot we I forgot we covered

00:17:06 --> 00:17:07

this. My bad, man.

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09

We went over this before twice.

00:17:10 --> 00:17:10

That in composition,

00:17:12 --> 00:17:13

if you have well

00:17:14 --> 00:17:14

or,

00:17:18 --> 00:17:18

fair, right, or

00:17:19 --> 00:17:21

there's different ways to write the lamb. Right?

00:17:21 --> 00:17:23

So if it's by itself,

00:17:25 --> 00:17:27

If there is a wow in the lamb,

00:17:30 --> 00:17:31

If there's a fa,

00:17:33 --> 00:17:33

Right?

00:17:35 --> 00:17:36

And with

00:17:42 --> 00:17:43

And actually, if you look at

00:17:45 --> 00:17:46

you see both.

00:17:47 --> 00:17:47

So

00:17:50 --> 00:17:51

with what?

00:17:53 --> 00:17:56

It's a sukoon. The Quran

00:18:02 --> 00:18:04

My teacher used to say that the Quran

00:18:04 --> 00:18:06

is a is a teacher for someone who

00:18:06 --> 00:18:07

doesn't have a teacher, if we just, like,

00:18:07 --> 00:18:08

pay attention.

00:18:09 --> 00:18:10

The next is called the prohibition.

00:18:13 --> 00:18:13

So

00:18:32 --> 00:18:33

I read,

00:18:35 --> 00:18:37

I should read it with humility

00:18:38 --> 00:18:39

because it's from

00:18:44 --> 00:18:46

And then that takes us to those

00:18:47 --> 00:18:48

articles that are going to make,

00:18:50 --> 00:18:51

Jazm of 2 verbs.

00:18:55 --> 00:18:55

Right?

00:18:56 --> 00:18:57

What's the difference between

00:18:57 --> 00:19:00

the first verb and the second verb in

00:19:01 --> 00:19:02

the

00:19:03 --> 00:19:04

case?

00:19:05 --> 00:19:05

What

00:19:06 --> 00:19:07

happened?

00:19:08 --> 00:19:10

No. No. No. I'm saying if I look

00:19:10 --> 00:19:12

at the the verbs,

00:19:13 --> 00:19:15

what's the sign of jazm that's different in

00:19:15 --> 00:19:16

each one of them? It's

00:19:17 --> 00:19:17

easy.

00:19:27 --> 00:19:29

Right? So you can see, like,

00:19:31 --> 00:19:33

and, like, just a regular

00:19:36 --> 00:19:36

verb.

00:19:42 --> 00:19:43

So into.

00:19:46 --> 00:19:46

Right?

00:20:28 --> 00:20:30

And if you wanna know how well you

00:20:30 --> 00:20:32

understand the Quran or anything, always try always

00:20:32 --> 00:20:33

do.

00:20:36 --> 00:20:36

Yeah.

00:20:41 --> 00:20:42

So,

00:20:42 --> 00:20:45

So, like, that's gonna tell you if you

00:20:45 --> 00:20:46

say, like, I thought you said, your

00:20:47 --> 00:20:48

who who Allah is like, woah. Woah. Woah.

00:20:48 --> 00:20:50

Woah. No. You

00:20:53 --> 00:20:54

You die if Allah. Mhmm. Or

00:21:06 --> 00:21:07

Then

00:21:07 --> 00:21:08

we're

00:21:08 --> 00:21:11

gonna look at in. So in, we said

00:21:14 --> 00:21:16

Like, if you try, you succeed.

00:21:26 --> 00:21:28

We have to stop now because people came.

00:21:29 --> 00:21:31

This Thursday, I'm not gonna be here

00:21:32 --> 00:21:33

because I have to go to Tandon.

00:21:34 --> 00:21:35

So we'll meet

00:21:36 --> 00:21:36

next

00:21:37 --> 00:21:39

Tuesday, but we're gonna start remind me of

00:21:39 --> 00:21:40

where to start from. Michelle, do I start?

00:21:41 --> 00:21:43

The one that I asked about where the

00:21:43 --> 00:21:45

the head back. Yeah. It's being

00:21:46 --> 00:21:48

formed into the the future because of how

00:21:48 --> 00:21:49

to

00:21:50 --> 00:21:52

and No. But is the verb. Floral

00:21:55 --> 00:21:57

is the past. Oh, okay. You

00:21:58 --> 00:21:59

have people. Okay.

00:22:00 --> 00:22:00

No. That's good. Good.

00:22:05 --> 00:22:08

So remind me, next time start on in.

00:22:08 --> 00:22:08

Okay.

Share Page