Shadee Elmasry – Why is religion more authentic when rooted in the past

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses a course that focuses on technology and technology is the opposite of science. The course is a combination of rooting in the Arabic language and learning about the past. There is a risk of losing information if there are similar incidents, but the course aims to improve science and technology rather than just discovering new things.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:03

Of course, the one that happened earlier, we root ourselves in the

00:00:03 --> 00:00:06

past because this is a religion of transmission. This is not science

00:00:06 --> 00:00:09

and being up to date with technology, scholars of the past,

00:00:09 --> 00:00:12

they were more pious than us. They knew the Arabic language better

00:00:12 --> 00:00:15

than us, the tradition was shorter to them. generations were shorter

00:00:15 --> 00:00:19

chances of things being lost or misunderstood less dad is where we

00:00:19 --> 00:00:22

learn our religion from technology is the opposite technology, you're

00:00:22 --> 00:00:25

always trying to push the envelope and discover something different,

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28

always trying to improve. So you want innovation in science and

00:00:28 --> 00:00:32

tech. It transmitted knowledge. The proof is how far back you can

00:00:32 --> 00:00:37

go. So if I if there's an incident that happened, let's say in 1905,

00:00:37 --> 00:00:43

and you have a newspaper reporting on the incident from 1906, but I

00:00:43 --> 00:00:48

have a newspaper reporting on the incident from 1905. The same year

00:00:48 --> 00:00:50

that it happened, Well, which one is going to be more authoritative?

00:00:50 --> 00:00:52

Let's say All else equal.

Share Page