Shadee Elmasry – The 5 Conditions of a Sahih Hadith

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses five conditions that make it impossible for Hadith to do something, including being a witness, being an upright witness, and being accurate. They stress the importance of history and proper records of behavior to convince Hadith of something. The speaker emphasizes the need for clear opinion and acknowledges that slip-ups can occur when faced with negative opinion. The speaker also discusses the use of a question mark on a teacher's narration and the importance of the Prophet's words in relation to actions, emphasizing the need for contextualization and clarification on actions.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:03 --> 00:00:06

What's the difference between weak Hadith and authentic hadith? Their

00:00:07 --> 00:00:11

sound Hadith has five conditions. These five conditions are

00:00:11 --> 00:00:16

determined by reason. And there are some texts of Quran and Hadith

00:00:16 --> 00:00:22

that would point to it. So shut on Laughlin shut on by text. And by

00:00:22 --> 00:00:26

common sense, the first thing is that it does not have Senate which

00:00:26 --> 00:00:30

means the whole the chain is complete. The chain of

00:00:30 --> 00:00:35

transmission is complete, meaning that from the incident until me

00:00:35 --> 00:00:38

the listener or when it was written down in the book.

00:00:39 --> 00:00:42

The chain is complete of people. There's no absence, there's no

00:00:42 --> 00:00:46

link, absent links like Frank, I'll give you an example. The

00:00:46 --> 00:00:51

Masjid is on fire. Who told you? Suleiman was Salamander? No.

00:00:52 --> 00:00:55

He wasn't there. So who told him? We don't know.

00:00:57 --> 00:01:01

So there's a missing link there. Right? But so who was Sulaiman

00:01:01 --> 00:01:06

quoting? So a man is quoting Musa, but did he meet Musa? No, he never

00:01:06 --> 00:01:11

met him. He's quoting someone he never met. Nah, we're not

00:01:11 --> 00:01:15

accepting this, right? We're not accepted. This is not acceptable.

00:01:15 --> 00:01:22

So that's number one. Masala Sana do. All right next is Allah Della.

00:01:22 --> 00:01:29

I dalla means uprightness. In the Summary, we would basically say

00:01:29 --> 00:01:32

ask the question, would this person be an upright witness in

00:01:32 --> 00:01:32

court?

00:01:33 --> 00:01:35

Or were they known for public sinning?

00:01:36 --> 00:01:39

publicly? Did they commit sins in public so we won't accept their

00:01:39 --> 00:01:45

testimony? For anything, let alone Hadith. So I doubt Allah, is that

00:01:45 --> 00:01:49

there is no accurate data is something you have automatically

00:01:49 --> 00:01:54

and you could lose it by your public misbehavior. Skipping

00:01:54 --> 00:01:57

prayers, eating in Ramadan, when you're not allowed to things like

00:01:57 --> 00:02:01

that, basically, or other things, much less than that sometimes.

00:02:01 --> 00:02:05

Number three, debates. Is he accurate? And how do we know if

00:02:05 --> 00:02:06

he's accurate?

00:02:07 --> 00:02:10

Do we go ask his wife, when you ask him for five things in the

00:02:10 --> 00:02:13

market? Does he come back with all five? Or did he forget one? Now

00:02:13 --> 00:02:18

that's not how we do it. dopt is determined by we look at all his

00:02:18 --> 00:02:18

narrations.

00:02:19 --> 00:02:22

And we compare them to his colleagues.

00:02:23 --> 00:02:27

When medic would sit when any scholar is how could know how a

00:02:27 --> 00:02:32

all these all Emma, would sit to give Hadith to further session of

00:02:32 --> 00:02:36

Hadith. You're not the only student there. Right? You're one

00:02:36 --> 00:02:38

of 200 students, you're one of 30 students, you're one of 50

00:02:38 --> 00:02:43

students, and the shift that scholar will have certain known

00:02:43 --> 00:02:48

students throughout his life. All right, well, then you come and say

00:02:48 --> 00:02:50

something and attribute it to the shake

00:02:51 --> 00:02:55

the trends the shake, said such and such, where they're gonna go

00:02:55 --> 00:02:57

to your colleagues, you're again, you're not the only student.

00:02:59 --> 00:03:05

If you now consistently are different in the narration, we

00:03:05 --> 00:03:08

have to downgrade you. There's something up something's up here.

00:03:08 --> 00:03:12

Your duct is off. You're you're never get it right. You

00:03:12 --> 00:03:18

consistently misquote leave something out. Add something out

00:03:18 --> 00:03:21

of order. It's never exactly as the ship said it.

00:03:22 --> 00:03:26

Yes, you're a loyal attendee or a loyal student. You're You're we

00:03:26 --> 00:03:30

don't have any doubts about your behavior. But your memory is not

00:03:30 --> 00:03:34

good. You're it's always something different, right? That you're

00:03:34 --> 00:03:38

dumped you downgraded. So that's number three. Now number four, and

00:03:38 --> 00:03:42

five are for big exceptions. They're negative, negative meaning

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44

we just we want the absence of these two things. What is the

00:03:44 --> 00:03:49

opposite? What do we need? We need the absence of should move should

00:03:49 --> 00:03:56

do it means you quoted properly. But I'm a senior student said the

00:03:56 --> 00:04:01

opposite. Or you quoted a hadith the hadith is sound in every way.

00:04:02 --> 00:04:06

But of Senior Companion quoted the opposite something totally

00:04:06 --> 00:04:09

different. So we just put a question mark on it. And we don't

00:04:09 --> 00:04:10

rule but

00:04:11 --> 00:04:16

let's say we all of us were five guys in the room. We have a che,

00:04:16 --> 00:04:20

we have one teacher, all of us. Let's say I'm the oldest of you.

00:04:21 --> 00:04:25

And out of You're the youngest, right. i Li goes and he's an

00:04:25 --> 00:04:29

upright Narrator from the teacher. And he narrates a story from the

00:04:29 --> 00:04:33

teacher that the teacher has visited South Africa.

00:04:34 --> 00:04:38

And I say, the teacher never visited South Africa. That's

00:04:38 --> 00:04:42

schueth. So you're upright and honest, and your behaviors good.

00:04:43 --> 00:04:46

And you're narrating something that the senior the older person,

00:04:46 --> 00:04:49

I've been with the shade for 20 years, even though it's set for

00:04:49 --> 00:04:49

two years.

00:04:51 --> 00:04:54

Right? That's a problem there. So what do we do with his narration?

00:04:54 --> 00:04:58

We put a question mark on it, circle that hadith, and we just

00:04:58 --> 00:04:59

don't use it. We don't say he's a liar.

00:05:00 --> 00:05:03

We don't say his doctors wrong. So that's called schueth When a,

00:05:05 --> 00:05:10

a sound Hadith contradicts a higher authority, and olders,

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14

higher meaning by age and time spent with the chef,

00:05:15 --> 00:05:16

or with the Prophet if it's the companions.

00:05:18 --> 00:05:24

Number five, the absence of a hidden error, a very subtle error,

00:05:24 --> 00:05:28

which you call it that affects the veracity of the Hadith. What does

00:05:28 --> 00:05:33

that mean? That means, even the best expert one day could slip.

00:05:34 --> 00:05:39

And that will only be known by the experts. And we even have like a

00:05:39 --> 00:05:44

slip up from emetic by flipping a name. Or he cited this these

00:05:44 --> 00:05:47

scholars are citing chains, and had deeds all day long, especially

00:05:47 --> 00:05:49

in the early days when the chain has only three four names, it's

00:05:49 --> 00:05:52

easy to remember. So he may be doing it so much, maybe who knows

00:05:52 --> 00:05:57

a slip up he cites one chain with the opposite Hadith. Or he cites a

00:05:57 --> 00:06:01

beloved best instead of Abdullah bin Omar, or he cites Solomon had

00:06:01 --> 00:06:03

been dealt with and it's actually done would have been Solomon.

00:06:04 --> 00:06:08

Those little slip up from the expert and who can cite that only

00:06:08 --> 00:06:12

another expert, only another expert can say he made a mistake.

00:06:13 --> 00:06:19

Those five conditions make us Hadith sounds and part of our law.

00:06:20 --> 00:06:25

Such a hadith can can we accept it as law and we can act upon it? We

00:06:25 --> 00:06:29

can not always we do. Because a sound hadith is one piece of

00:06:29 --> 00:06:32

evidence there could be other pieces of evidence. There could be

00:06:32 --> 00:06:37

analysis of the Hadith, like what once on Hadith, opposite Hadith.

00:06:38 --> 00:06:40

How do we make sense of this? The Prophet wore gold during the

00:06:40 --> 00:06:42

Prophet forbade gold.

00:06:43 --> 00:06:46

Very simply, there's a timeline, right? There's a timeline here.

00:06:46 --> 00:06:50

Yes, the prophet or gold sound Hadith, but it's abrogated after

00:06:50 --> 00:06:54

the Prophet war gold, he forbade golden never word again. So

00:06:54 --> 00:06:59

there's a timeline here. That's not all two dimensional. So a

00:06:59 --> 00:07:02

hadith may be 100% Sounds however,

00:07:04 --> 00:07:09

we don't act upon it. What's another one? It's 100% sounds but

00:07:09 --> 00:07:13

the mean but but it lacks any contextualization so we don't know

00:07:13 --> 00:07:14

how to act upon it.

00:07:15 --> 00:07:18

So it's Matata but the data we don't know how to act upon it.

00:07:18 --> 00:07:20

Right. So had in its nature

00:07:22 --> 00:07:25

or even have all multiple HotJobs saying in general, I wish the

00:07:25 --> 00:07:29

prophets I said them lived more so he could tell us more of the Ribba

00:07:29 --> 00:07:34

in in bartering. So we don't know a lot about the bartering.

00:07:35 --> 00:07:37

So those are examples of that.

00:07:38 --> 00:07:41

Another example where,

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44

let's say even medic for example.

00:07:46 --> 00:07:52

The Prophet peace be upon him for bade in a hadith for bade eating

00:07:52 --> 00:07:54

animals with canines.

00:07:56 --> 00:07:59

But the Quran says nothing is forbidden except what is in the

00:07:59 --> 00:08:00

Revelation. The Quran

00:08:02 --> 00:08:06

surah Jelena Kula Adji to female Oh hiya la female Oh hiya la

00:08:06 --> 00:08:11

Mohammed Illa Allah thymine IL. So therefore the ozone in the Quran.

00:08:11 --> 00:08:14

Surah Al Anam says there is nothing forbidden except what is

00:08:14 --> 00:08:19

revealed to me in x, y, z. Only in the Quran. So therefore medic says

00:08:19 --> 00:08:23

okay, well, then the Prophet forbade animals with fangs with

00:08:23 --> 00:08:27

canines. In other words, meat eaters, because it's not just the

00:08:27 --> 00:08:30

canines, by the way, squirrel has canines squirrel has sharp teeth.

00:08:30 --> 00:08:35

It's not just that it's meat eaters. Malik said he forbade it,

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37

meaning discouragement.

00:08:38 --> 00:08:41

Not for prohibition. It's a big difference, right big difference

00:08:41 --> 00:08:47

between discouragement and so you can have a sound Hadith but it's

00:08:47 --> 00:08:51

not acted upon or it's acted upon differently. Discouragement is

00:08:51 --> 00:08:53

different from admission. Right?

Share Page