Shadee Elmasry – Methods of Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik Ep. 7 Debunking Madhab Myths
AI: Summary ©
AI: Transcript ©
Get our Sahil Hadith alpha omega v How many times have you heard the
saying, if the hadith is sound, that's my method and all the 40
men have said that therefore oh we don't need methods all we need is
a Hadith. Firstly, let me tell you it is impossible that Abu Hanifa
automatic ever said that
or that they they may have meant it meaning that it was widespread
because both of them downgrade the head narration the solids every
narration, they find something greater than it as evidence Matic
finds what's called the I'm an Medina, which is the fatwa or the
action or the ruling of the all the scholars of Medina.
He finds that to be stronger than a solitary, single solitary
narration. Abu Hanifa would find other things stronger, that he had
his own type of amen for the scholars of Kufa that so it's
impossible that they said that right. At a Shafi and Achmed
however elevated so it could be sound from them. I know there are
some people who said yes, they said it. But let me tell you
something. When you study French study from French people
don't study French language from a Moroccan who learned French don't
study English, from an Indian, who in Mumbai learned English in
school. Okay? Learn the language from its people. All right. Learn
the method from its people, I'd say I see this many times, and it
drives you nuts. You find a person quoting a madhhab. From someone
who eats that method, or someone who doesn't believe that in that
method.
Learn the method from the people of the mother let me tell you, you
will not find a single Hanafi scholar from history or medic a
scholar, I can even be more certain whoever says if the heavy
the sahaba. That's the method Well, the mimetic so who is going
to be weightier or more true? The scholars of that matter, or haters
of them are the
or critics of that method who's going to be more true? So here's
another thing is that when you want to study a method, go to that
method and read their own books, as opposed to reading about the
method from the critique or from the critics