Shadee Elmasry – Just because they narrate the hadith…

Shadee Elmasry
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the use of narratives in a culture and how they can be considered authentic or offhanded. They mention specific narratives and their use in various settings, such as history and religion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of citing authentic narratives and their use in context.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:03
			Just because ImageReady to 30
narrates a hadith does not mean he
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:08
			supports it doesn't mean he sell
it Majidi to 30 his main work, he
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:12
			has two main works. One is the
massive history. The other one is
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:15
			is Tafseer. And his style of
Tafseer is he goes from fetch head
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:19
			down, and he talks about every
narration that was uttered that
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:25
			was stated by anyone. Okay?
Related to that doesn't mean he
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:29
			supports it. He so he's an
encyclopedic good. He's not
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:33
			selecting the Hadith that he
believes are correct. And you have
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:37
			to know that there are three major
works who do not do this or who
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:41
			who do not only cite what they
think is correct, and they are a
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:43
			buddy, okay, and
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:48
			Imam Muhammad and humble and
before both of them even Malik Ibn
		
00:00:48 --> 00:00:55
			Anas good. In America, bananas has
60 Hadees he's citing to let you
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:57
			know that he knows about these
Hadith but he finds them to be
		
00:00:57 --> 00:01:01
			exceptional or contextualized and
he doesn't apply them in his FIP
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:03
			Imams duty narrate 60 of them.
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:08
			Imam Ahmed his own son came to him
he said Father you narrated a
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:11
			hadith in the most net but your
ruling is different. He said my
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:14
			Muslim is not my the Hadith that I
rule by.
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:19
			I'm putting in the most net
anything that any scholar or all
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:23
			the Hadith that any reputable
scholar uses in their FIP so even
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:26
			if I find a stronger narration or
a stronger proof or contextualize
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:31
			that hadith are limited, okay? or
suspend it because its context is
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:35
			unknown. Okay, but someone else
uses it then he includes it.
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:39
			That's mmm Ramadan is mostly a
debris as well. He cites many a
		
00:01:39 --> 00:01:43
			hadith, which he's citing them so
that you know they're there.
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:47
			Right? This is like scholarly
honesty, right? This is proper
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:50
			scholarship, so that you know that
there. He learned he lists all
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:53
			these then he goes at the bottom
and he said and I find the strong
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:57
			one or the one that makes the most
that's that's most corroborated or
		
00:01:57 --> 00:02:01
			that fits with the texts or that
has no contradictions to be x y&z
		
00:02:01 --> 00:02:04
			So just the fact that he met
somebody cites this does not mean
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:06
			that it's the kid