Shadee Elmasry – Bukhari Class #14 2of2
AI: Summary ©
The conversation is difficult to follow and appears to be a discussion about distraction and distraction. The speakers discuss various topics such as distraction, family, and the importance of proper behavior. They also mention the possibility of sueing for someone who did not do something correctly.
AI: Summary ©
Do you need to go out, you know, defend the city or defend
something and you say, well, but what my kids and who's gonna take
care of them, and he's gonna do that. And, you know, so then you
become fearful. And it causes you to be a coward when there's
actually something more pressing more important that you need to go
and fulfill.
So in that sense, they can be a distraction. And your wealth can
be that too, right? You can say, well, I have these businesses, I
can't just go out and do these things. And who's gonna watch my
business for me, I can't go to Hajj who's gonna watch my business
for me, they'll steal, they'll do this. So even that sense source of
wealth where he has the means to go to Hajj, but he decides not to
because you can't trust anyway to watch over. Whether that's true or
not.
So that means that there are fitting in the sense that now your
heart becomes distracted from what's more important. So then the
sadaqa, and the soul and these things, they can be
a means by which to expiate that distraction of the heart.
It doesn't relieve you from doing things you have to do. So if you
never go to Hajj. And you just say, Well, you know, I prayed and
gave some silica that Oh, no, it doesn't activate it, because it's
considered a debt
in that regard, but if you know, you have this fitna of
destruction, so you're doing trying to fill those rights, but
nevertheless, you're distracted, then this, the regular acts of
piety are a means by which to to expiate that.
So
the next part of the Hadith, actually, it's not included in
every genres, commentary, but
has a historical precedent that maybe we'll I think we'll leave
till next time.
So we have a few minutes before
that will leave to question I think next week is our last week
shall the 22nd. So hopefully, we'll get a couple more we'll get
close to the 40 that we had originally planned for.
In Sharla.
Yes, good question.
Stan was sitting.
In even doughnuts commentary that you mentioned about the cable that
you just mentioned about those standards. As
I understand, it says to Dumas,
you change direction with it, so you can't face the Qibla Malim to
show cause havoc, assuming that your companions can keep up with
you. But if they can't, then you don't do that. You can just sit
down, and you don't have to change direction.
So only if you're physically able to do that you don't get seasick
and you can move with it, then that's what that's referring to.
That is all you meant.
Yeah, I'm just trying to figure out the context.
I just wasn't seeing it
doesn't say it explicitly. That's true. But it's understood the
doodle
that you know, you're moving with it to face
anyone else?
Permanently disability and you're unable to perform declared, and
it'll go constantly time, the longer
they could not be responsible for repairs. But is there any kind of
explanation for that that family member's
bill
there's no explanation for something that's not required of
you. Excavation only happens when there's something required of you
and either you don't do it right or you're Miss or something like
that. But if it's not required, because of some, you know, someone
who doesn't have the means to go to Hajj and never goes there's
nothing on them
performing physically meeting or mentally
just recite as much as I said, Are you going to do it?
They're not enough anymore. They're not.
They're not held responsible for that anymore if they don't have
the means by which to do it.
And unlike
Hodge, where people someone can do Hajj with someone else who didn't
go
to do prayers for someone else, because that's an individual
obligation that's connected with the person themselves, where
Hedge there's that element of you actually having the financial
means to do it. So you can do subtle clots charity in someone
else's name or hedge in someone else's name. But like you can't
fast for someone else, or pray for someone else to do their prayers
for them, because that's something that's, you know, has no
connection with, there's no Nieva there's no someone doing it on
your behalf because the nature of it itself, but you could do
something else, you know, if someone wants to establish a
sadhaka God or something like that, but it's not flat required,
because they're not they're not held responsible for that.
No, point in time when you weren't
in your prayers, like
would there be some kinds of
prayers or prayers that incorrectly or would you just be
like doing them over and no one was saying correctly means
incorrectly the extent where they were not valid, and that's, that's
a whole nother thing. But assuming that they that's not the case,
then one just works forward now on what they need to do ahead of
them. And I couldn't tell someone do all those over again. There
have been people who've kind of
after they've, they've made a repentance even though used to
pray they want to still do the ones over that's an individual
thing, but it's not something that's a ruling that can apply to
everybody. It's not necessary.
Yes, somebody can see the patch for the person who didn't do
whether he had means to perform the logic or whether he did not
have the means
to do the Hajj. So in the cases, somebody else can
sue me they've done their own already.
They've done their own fun times and then they can do it for
someone else.
named Zach Moloch one week left Shala so hopefully we'll get to
that next week and as last month on your channel
you talked with artists when I send them a new digital so when
you know aluminum can even withstand worse and when you
sneeze when you McCann well after that when and from that I would
add I mean Subhanallah we could represent the MLC when we said
Enron was anywhere from today.
Right
Right
Right
RIGHT.
RIGHT.
Right