Shadee Elmasry – Aqidah Dispute Do Things Have Inherent Power

We traveled with you, in ships, in other words, so Allah is

attributing the existence of ships to Himself. Therefore, inventions

made by human beings are also the creation of Allah subhanaw taala

and of course everything is the creation of Allah will call aka

Kula shaker Allah says this is important because there is Aki to

dispute

with the students of entertainment and they say that Allah creates

powers within things.

And we say no, no, right? No be on why do we say no, because if Allah

creates power within things, then you can then those things make

something then you could attribute the pearl to the oyster, right?

You would attribute the the pearl to the oyster and therefore it

would negate the direct statement of ALLAH SubhanA wa Tada. Allah

created all things. So that is one of the points of dispute now what

what is the level of that point of dispute? Some of the scholars have

edited sunnah have said that if somebody says that Allah gave them

the power, then it would remove it from Cofer. And we would simply

say it's an innovation. Is it an innovation that puts you outside

of Edison? Or is it an innovation in itself only?

Allah knows best about that. I do believe that they say it's an

innovation that puts you outside of Edison. Because Cydia Hamid did

in his Clarita.

He calls that person a bidet. The mess Allah in Arabic is called

Miss Ella to Al Quwata Muda.

The issue in Arabic If you want to look it up in Arabic, salt, Alcoa,

Al Muda,

the place to power did Allah place power, real true power

in anything? And we say the answer to that is no. Yet because Allah

attributes all creations to himself. And if true power was

placed by Allah into something else, then that thing created

something good.

produce something like the way an oyster produces a pearl, then we

would have to attribute the pearl to the oyster. Okay. So we say no,

we can say that somebody created something, mainly mainly as a

means we can say that, right? He created a great masterpiece. But

what we mean by that is that you're the means of that

masterpiece coming into existence. And we hold all of the

true creation, to be the direct creation of Allah. And here, ALLAH

SubhanA What's odd is attributing

the ships to himself when cruise ships are not a natural produce

thing humans made ships, right? Well loaded Jodan oneshots. So to

man, for him, are the chips that move. You see how it's just

theological proof for him know who he is the creator of that. If we

make if you make a robot, and you program the robot, right? And then

that robot then goes and produces what you programmed it to produce,

right? A car, or that you gave it the ability to acquire the

knowledge to download all the factory knowledge of how to make a

car and then it goes and makes a car. You're the maker of the car.

Right? You made it. So nothing has troupe? Essentially, the analogy

of robots is very good in the sense that no matter what a robot

does, the human gets the credit who made the robot? Right? It

cannot. Yeah, so there's no legal power, or existence to a robot.

Right? So in the same way, we have wealth and we produce wealth, for

example, but Allah subhana wa Tada says, what to whom give to the

poor, minimal Allah from the wealth of Allah, which He gave

you. So Allah owns the wealth, and he gave it to you as a steward of

that wealth. Now, I just want to make one point clear here.

When we make when we mentioned, a

disagreement

of this nature of theology with the Tamizh, or set of views or

somebody's, okay, I want to just say here, we're not making

anathemas in the amount of Islam or to create because somebody will

take it the wrong way. We would clearly if someone explicitly says

No, Allah is not the creator of all things, and they'll never say

that. They'll say, Yes, Allah is the Creator of all things, and

they'll have their own way of going around it. So that will

downgrade the disagreement from like heresy to you're incorrect

about that. And I do think that the issue of a court and Buddha

the majority of Edison that did all this to be a very

In a cutaway matter, that would render one a moped. Could you look

it up?

I mean, it's it's in the sentence yet it's in the Khadija when he

says veka de un and early sunnah I believe he means that's an

innovation. It's you become a sector now. Right? You're You're

it's a it's an innovation that puts you outside of medicine. If

you say that things have actual power.

I'm now reading Shara Animoca geomet written by associate Maliki

circle S Bab wo is nerd theory s babble idea, which means a branch

of Shick meaning granting a divine attribute to a created being is

that you attribute the effect to the means

to the means so I'm now satisfied in my body by drinking this

tea this Chai? Is it the chai that satisfied me or is the

satisfaction a creation of Allah directly? I must attribute the

satisfaction to Allah directly Okay. Through that he did that

through the drink but the drink itself has no power absolutely no

power at all.

Cuz shitcan philosopher who has this the philosophers and the

naturalist and today the scientists, essentially everyone

who is believes in naturalism.

Okay, well, men, Tabby, Alamanda, Vedic. Well, I'm actually writing

a circular rod. Okay, we're talking a lot about and hochma

said this. Now he says, he says here, there's a tough seal men

color fill as verbal idea in order to get through Vitalia for Kadakia

hmm, recovery we mentioned that. But whoever says that it does have

a direct effect because Allah placed that power in it. Be cool

with an elder or Hello which I'll have you up for her first circuit

and move on with eco vehicle learn. Alright, so he is a big

day. This is an innovation why you are negating a direct verse of

Allah. Wa Calaca. Colors, shape, color come when match I'm alone,

he created you and your actions. Your very action is a creation.

Therefore how could you be the result the cause of an if

the source of the effect. So our theology is very different from

our law here. In law, we don't bring this up in law. You have

agency and you're responsible for your actions which you intended.

You're also responsible to a lesser degree for actions you

didn't intend. That means I accidentally broke your mug. I owe

you the mug, right? I accidentally injured somebody, I owe him a

deal. I owe him money. I accidentally kill somebody. I owe

his inheritors money, blood money. If I intentionally did it, then I

then it could be dia orca sauce or forgiveness. Point being is that

don't confuse

the hokum ID with the haka of things, the hokum it is life as we

know it. Life as we know it, okay. I do stuff if I want to what my my

throne and drink I need to drink, right? So that's called hokum, ID,

the normal way of life. But the Haqiqa of things. The Reality of

Things is different from a commodity. The reality of things

is that Allah is the creator of every single action we do. What do

we do? Allah says, Lahoma Conservatoire, they have access

but our role is Casper, which is intending. That's what we gained.

I intended Lahoma Conservatoire, the hammock talks about so Allah

Tala calls this cusp. So as you understand the difference, what is

ID ID is what Allah has accustomed us to. Allah has accustomed to us

if you're cold, make a fire. If you're dirty, pour water on

yourself and you become clean. Pour Soap on yourself and not

soil, right. If you're if you want something to be cut, get something

sharp, not blunt.

But neither the sharpness nor the bluntness has true power in

itself, but you still do it. Just the fact that we do something and

we advocate doing something and we study it, and we are amazed by the

last creation does not mean it has true reality, power in itself. So

that's something that is to be understood.